You people CANT be this bored with life.
--- Fred Fitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dex,
You need to do your homework. RADAR as we know it
(Police Radar) is not
even covered under Part 15. A lot has changed over
the years.
Fred
-Original Message-
From:
We can't? And why not?
Some people have to be bored with something ... and the folks
on here could be just the people you seem to be looking for ...
Neil McKie
Cody Hayden wrote:
You people CANT be this bored with life.
--- Fred Fitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dex,
You
Actually I am having so much fun who has time to be bored .
ta ta !
Mark A. Holman AB8RU ARRL Life Member
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]
Depending on the colors of the lights, they may also be legal.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:45 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re:
If you are a ham, K band is a shared allocation and covered under Part 97
(per Riley) If you are not a ham, it is covered under Part 90 and if you
already are licensed under Part 90, that license covers it.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL
GROL does not provide any authorization to test drive radar.
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Kirby
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:37 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC
For the same reason one might stand in a Park and give a speech that nobody
cares about. It is legal.
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Pugh
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:50 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
This IS correct, radar uses a transmitter and ALL transmitters are
required to be licensed. I am sure he does not have a license.
Having a radar unit
But does it pass the common sense test? I agree, it is legal and within
our rights to possess the thing, but knowing that possession alone could
possibly get you into trouble, and knowing that you had no need to own
it besides to play with it, why mount it on your car, except to play
cop? It
At 05:38 AM 7/22/2005, Mike Pugh wrote:
But does it pass the common sense test? I agree, it is legal and within
our rights to possess the thing, but knowing that possession alone could
possibly get you into trouble,
Isn't that an oxymoron?
and knowing that you had no need to own
it besides to
Mike,
I am a retired LE office. If it is such a big deal, then there should be a
statute that prohibits its use In a motor vehicle. I may not care for a lot
Of things people do, but they should not get in trouble for it. We have a
process in the US for dealing with such issues.
If I do not
Using it is absolutely legal. As long as it is on the ham bands or one has a
Part 90 license! Per the FCC, in writing!
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of motarolla_doctor
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 6:27 AM
To:
Mike,
How many people in this world lack common sense! A lot. We dont arrest
for that, nor does the lack of common sense provide for 'probable cause
to make an arrest.
Why should anyone get in trouble for a lack of common
sense. Laws are enacted to hopefully (bit always don't)
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
This IS correct, radar uses a transmitter and ALL transmitters are
required to be licensed. I am sure he does not have a license.
Having a radar unit
Mike Pugh wrote:
But it also tends to get one arrested.. So, unless you're a cop, or are
not wishing to invite trouble, why have one? Mike
But how can someone be arrested if they didn't do anything illegal
If that's why the guy was given a ticket, the cop should be arrested,
and taken off
BRAVOMy whole point exactly.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim B.
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a
Dave VanHorn wrote:
At 05:38 AM 7/22/2005, Mike Pugh wrote:
But does it pass the common sense test? I agree, it is legal and within
our rights to possess the thing, but knowing that possession alone could
possibly get you into trouble,
Isn't that an oxymoron?
Right. 'Getting into trouble'
Likewise, well said!
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Fred Fitte wrote:
Mike,
I am a retired LE office. If it is such a big deal, then there should be a
statute that prohibits its use In a motor vehicle. I may not care for a lot
Of things people do, but they should not get in trouble for it. We
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Neal Newman wrote:
Yeah Right USDHS is the First step to being American Nazis
I Vant to see your papers you need to carry your birth certificate
or passport upstate NY without Leaving the state.
I know it happened to me. First thing Customs needs to do is to get
Not For nothing.
I once owned a Crown Vic Bought it from a police auction complete
with the Bolted Transmission.
It was an old PA state Police chase car can you say Fast YEP. But the
speed limit is Only 65.
when I lived in NY I was involved in law enforcement. also my local
OEM.
I had at
Whether he DID or DID NOT do anything illegal is up to the courts to
decide. Apparently, one can infer from the arresting officer's actions
that the officer had probable cause to arrest him based on what he
observed Mike
Jim B. wrote:
Mike Pugh wrote:
But it also tends to get one
Mike Pugh wrote:
Whether he DID or DID NOT do anything illegal is up to the courts to
decide. Apparently, one can infer from the arresting officer's actions
that the officer had probable cause to arrest him based on what he
observed Mike
No-only that he THOUGHT he did.
--
Jim Barbour
At 11:12 AM 7/22/2005, Jim B. wrote:
Mike Pugh wrote:
Whether he DID or DID NOT do anything illegal is up to the courts to
decide. Apparently, one can infer from the arresting officer's actions
that the officer had probable cause to arrest him based on what he
observed Mike
No-only
motarolla_doctor wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Otterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
This IS correct, radar uses a transmitter and ALL transmitters are
required to be licensed. I am sure he does not have a
Could someone send me the URL to the original article off line. I have a
friend in the NC Highway Patrol who is interested and is questioning whether
this really happened. Please send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
At 06:12 AM 7/21/2005, you wrote:
Could someone send me the URL to the original article off line. I have a
friend in the NC Highway Patrol who is interested and is questioning whether
this really happened. Please send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Fred
Hi, Fred (and all)
It happened. I was
Well I went to the website posted and saw a picture of jerry's
car.
I would like jerry to explain why he has a Traffic Radar gun sitting
on his dash, (zoom in on the dash) I think that might have been a
factor in his getting arrested. Being a Ham and also a police officer
I see allot of hams that
Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
rear deck behind the deck speaker? I looked for one on the driver's
side, but couldn't positively make out that there was a light there.
Looks to me like Jerry is in deep doo doo... Mike
Eric wrote:
Well I went to the
Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: OT: NC man charged with 'driving a
But it also tends to get one arrested.. So, unless you're a cop, or are
not wishing to invite trouble, why have one? Mike
Fred Fitte wrote:
Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
At 08:45 PM 7/21/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
rear deck behind the deck speaker?
---Looks like a set of wig-wags to me...
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
Jeff
At 08:46 PM 7/21/2005, you wrote:
Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 8:43 PM
To:
Fred Fitte wrote:
Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
But using it on the highway can get you in trouble. I know someone who
almost got boxed up by a group of 18 wheelers when they figured out the
signal lighting up their radar detectors was coming from a personal
vehicle. A lot
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Jeff Otterson wrote:
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
It's been said before that Jerry runs a communications shop; don't most
shops own a repeater or three and have Part 90 license? Perhaps he was out
for a test drive that day to test the radar
Or at least a wag! :-) Mike
Ken Arck wrote:
At 08:45 PM 7/21/2005 -0400, you wrote:
Did you also note what looked to me to be a flashing lite on the left
rear deck behind the deck speaker?
---Looks like a set of wig-wags to me...
Ken
Kris Kirby wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Jeff Otterson wrote:
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
It's been said before that Jerry runs a communications shop; don't most
shops own a repeater or three and have Part 90 license? Perhaps he was out
for a test drive
Or Part 97. As was stated before, we share one of the 'radar' bands with
other services.
Joe M.
Jeff Otterson wrote:
I thought that police radar was licensed under Part 90...
Jeff
At 08:46 PM 7/21/2005, you wrote:
Having a radar unit is perfectly legal.
Fred
-Original
I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the radios
never came into play here - just the antennas. I have about 7 antennas
on my vehicle
mch wrote:
I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the radios
never came into play here - just the antennas.
I know some of the
Just a guess, but because he is a LICENSED HAM and may want to use the
HAM BAND that many radar guns transmit on or can be modified to transmit
on? Not everyone sticks with HF, or even VHF/UHF bands.
As for 'extra' brake lights (assuming they are red) in the rear deck,
most PD cars are sold with
Mike Pugh wrote:
mch wrote:
I know lots of hams who have EmCom vehicles under their own authority.
You don't need permission to put one together. You only need permission
of a PS agency to put transmit in an authorized radio, but the radios
never came into play here - just the
Yeah Right USDHS is the First step to being American Nazis
I Vant to see your papers you need to carry your birth certificate
or passport upstate NY without Leaving the state.
I know it happened to me. First thing Customs needs to do is to get
rid of the Mexican looking officers out of
K-55's on X band are still very much in use in New Jersey, which, at one
time (maybe still) had the highest per-capita number of radar units in
service. NJ state law still requires X band radar for the State Police!
They're still using most of the units that they bought when the national 55
back in 1976 I was at a ham swap and this dude had a old speed meter like
D'Arvsonal kind that was older than dirt ! we plugged it in and we watched
the meter bounc between speeds only this dud wanted some illegal stuff to
trade, I offered him cash for it I said I don't smoke Dope and I am
Gents,
Recently (May 2005) two young ham radio operators in my town,
each of whom drove retired New York State Police cruisers
they had purchased at state auction were questioned and given
a hard time by both the local county Sheriff and several State Police
officers.
Both are amateur radio
I have a suburban 1997 white with 6 antennas for Ham radio rigs and a UHF
radio for Med Chs. I am also the Asst. EMS Director with an ambulance
service and have flashing lights. the State Police here in CO have hassled
me about my suburban. To have lights you must possess an Authorized
Frank R. Vondra wrote:
As an amateur radio operator and 30 year law enforcement
veteran, I agree with you Lance. After blowing up the
photo of the 1995 Caprice displayed on the jars webpage,
I'm somewhat curious to know why the defendant has an
MPH K-55 mobile radar unit mounted on the dash?
MPH units were dogs... I know I repaired and recertified them for several
years. At least in FL X band (10 GHz) was
not valid even before 1993. I am saying that I THINK X band was out of the
picture nationwide at that time but I never saw it in
writing so I cant bet my life on it.
I too was in
Jim B. wrote:
So I don't believe any dept
should still be using them. I know NO ONE here in NE Ohio that uses
10Ghz radar anymore.
I should add that they don't use 10Ghz units for issuing tickets anymore...
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web,
The problem is selective enforcement AND too much spare time on
their hands. Instead of horassing thoes who would help them in a
time of need, they should be nailing drunk driver and putting then
in jail. I just watched a Sherrif Deputy sitting at an intersection
and about 10 cars ran the STOP
Now the truth comes out ! Playing Wannabe cop, we just had a similar problem
with a turkey who so far I know a non-ham over in Ottawa County, he just got
busted. I was on the phone one day with State Dispatch about an issue and I
asked about the phoney cop case I also advised them about some
As an amateur radio operator and 30 year law enforcement
veteran, I agree with you Lance. After blowing up the
photo of the 1995 Caprice displayed on the jars webpage,
I'm somewhat curious to know why the defendant has an
MPH K-55 mobile radar unit mounted on the dash? I'm sure
it's not for
52 matches
Mail list logo
