Sage-Devel,
I've been asked to write a review of Sage for SIAM Review, the main
journal for the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. I'd
like to include some concrete examples of some fast and powerful
commands in Sage that would interest applied mathematicians. For
example, Sage
Hi Fergus,
thank you for your comments!
So, do you consider working on a Quantity porting worthwhile? It seems
that you got some good experience by working on it, so you can
probably give some better advice about the structure of that package.
Moreover, I'm wondering how much work would it
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:04:37 +1100
Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
A meta-comment: I basically just wrote down snippets of what people
were saying in that discussion. I will try to go through it and
expand a little bit. Also for the technical parts (which are
amenable to send me
What the code does is to assign PP to a suitable projective space. I
imagine that the intention was for the user to provide the ambient
space if they had it handy, so that assignment should be wrapped in
if PP is None:.
John
2009/3/16 dmharvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu:
Hi,
The constructor for
I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
scrubbed, since this could either mean thoroughly cleaned up to it
is sparklingly clean and beautiful or deleted, erased completely as
in a well-used blackboard.
I assume the former ;) but would appreciate it if some of the
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
Do you foresee any occasion to meet physically all three of us?
Well, at least two of us are at FPSAC 09 at RISC.
(I love all these abbreviations, it feels so french :-)
:-)
(3) The interpreter makes a heuristic choice which
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:04:37 +1100
Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
A meta-comment: I basically just wrote down snippets of what people
were saying in that discussion. I will try to go through it and
expand
Awesome! Looks like your patch is a little more comprehensive than
what I was planning, I might pick and choose a bit :-)
david
On Mar 15, 11:09 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
My wrapper that I never got around to submitting...
Nick
frobenius.py
10KViewDownload
On
sage: K.u = LaurentSeriesRing(QQ)
sage: R.t = PowerSeriesRing(QQ)
3. coercion to R does not work (R(u) fails trying to coerce to QQ).
I guess this is the same sort of problem as what I reported in trac
#5468.
chris.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
Maurizio wrote:
Hi Fergus,
thank you for your comments!
So, do you consider working on a Quantity porting worthwhile? It seems
that you got some good experience by working on it, so you can
probably give some better advice about the structure of that package.
Moreover, I'm wondering how
Maurizio wrote:
Regarding the output of such expression you wrote, I agree that it
should give a standard unit output for each physical quantity, so by
presetting SI (or imperial, or anything else), it should give just
meters (or feets, or anything else)...
I'm pretty sure that would cause
Dear All,
I've some trouble compiling the doc:
tomahawk-*e/sage-3.4/devel $ sage -clone doc
[...]
tomahawk-*e/sage-3.4/devel $ cd sage-doc
tomahawk-*4/devel/sage-doc $ sage -b doc
[...]
tomahawk-*4/devel/sage-doc $ sage -docbuild reference html
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Dear Folks,
I am working my way through the Sage 3.4 Tutorial from my local copy of
it, with sage running in a terminal.
I have encountered some pitfalls., some typographic errors, and some
mystifying errors. I am collating these into a text file. But before I
put in too much effort into it,
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:04:37PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the above site, I notice the following dot point:
credit: young people, publication record
I'm not
Ronan Paixão wrote:
I agree. As a member of the non-math-teacher part of this list, I must
agree that plot(some_single_var_function_or_expression, 0, 1) should be
considered as valid input.
The original proposal by Carl said this would work (see point 3).
(well, he had parentheses around
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:04 AM, John Cremona wrote:
I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
scrubbed, since this could either mean thoroughly cleaned up to it
is sparklingly clean and beautiful or deleted, erased completely as
in a well-used blackboard.
I assume
I agree. As a member of the non-math-teacher part of this list, I must
agree that plot(some_single_var_function_or_expression, 0, 1) should be
considered as valid input.
The original proposal by Carl said this would work (see point 3).
(well, he had parentheses around the range, but it
Thanks, Justin. I wish I could have been there!
John
2009/3/16 Justin Walker jus...@mac.com:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:04 AM, John Cremona wrote:
I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
scrubbed, since this could either mean thoroughly cleaned up to it
is
Greetings. This might not qualify as interesting or relevant, but for
my own research, I wrote a Sage app to calculate via Monte Carlo
approximation the Cramer-Rao bounds for estimating certain target
parameters from synthetic aperture radar data. MPMath's arbitrary-
precision float functionality
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Ahmed Fasih wuzzyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings. This might not qualify as interesting or relevant, but for
my own research, I wrote a Sage app to calculate via Monte Carlo
approximation the Cramer-Rao bounds for estimating certain target
parameters from
On Mar 16, 8:09 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear All,
I've some trouble compiling the doc:
SNIP
File /usr/local/sage/sage/devel/sage/doc/common/builder.py, line 498, in
get_module_docstring_title
__import__(module_name)
ImportError: No module
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar
chyav...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
I am working my way through the Sage 3.4 Tutorial from my local copy of
it, with sage running in a terminal.
I have encountered some pitfalls., some typographic errors, and some
mystifying
Hi Sage-Devel,
Here's yet *another* person that can't use our binary on OS X 10.4
PPC. Michael, can you change the binary name to make it clear that it
won't work?
Hi Tom,
Currently the only way to install sage-3.4 on a G4 is to upgrade an
existing install or build from source.
William
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:04 AM, John Cremona wrote:
I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
scrubbed, since this could either mean thoroughly cleaned up to it
is sparklingly clean and beautiful or deleted, erased completely as
in a well-used blackboard.
I assume
kcrisman wrote:
I agree. As a member of the non-math-teacher part of this list, I must
agree that plot(some_single_var_function_or_expression, 0, 1) should be
considered as valid input.
The original proposal by Carl said this would work (see point 3).
(well, he had parentheses around the
On Mar 16, 9:53 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Here's yet *another* person that can't use our binary on OS X 10.4
PPC. Michael, can you change the binary name to make it clear that it
won't work?
I have removed both OSX 10.4 binaries from them mirror directory
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Ahmed Fasih wuzzyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings. This might not qualify as interesting or relevant, but for
my own research, I wrote a Sage app to calculate via Monte Carlo
approximation the Cramer-Rao bounds for estimating certain target
parameters from
Dear Michael,
On Mar 16, 8:09 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear All,
I've some trouble compiling the doc:
SNIP
File /usr/local/sage/sage/devel/sage/doc/common/builder.py, line 498,
in get_module_docstring_title
On Mar 16, 10:30 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Dear Michael,
Hi Florent,
This issue was fixed in the final 3.4 tarball - you should check if
you have multiple heads in case you are truly running the final 3.4.
Strange !!! My install is a brand new one
On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
same issue you described. I am poking around to see what is
happening ...
An observation:
pickling environment... done
checking consistency...
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
same issue you described. I am poking around to see what is
happening ...
On Mar 16, 11:08 am, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
same issue
Hi
There is a quaternion_order.rst in devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
algebras that seems to be autogenerated.
After nuking the output directory rebuilding all documentation
repeatedly works.
I tried this one... But on my computation server:
sage/algebras/steenrod_algebra_element
On Mar 16, 11:25 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Hi
There is a quaternion_order.rst in devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
algebras that seems to be autogenerated.
After nuking the output directory rebuilding all documentation
repeatedly works.
I tried this
In fact my idea is a bit different, and I'll explain in a minute:
provided that the system is SI, you should get the result as a
multiplier (bigger than one) of the closest classic unit
representation
ex: meters - nm - um - mm - m - km - ecc ecc
ex:
x1 = 10cm
x2 = 1m
x1 + x2 = 1.1m
y1 = 1V
It might be, but this is the error reported: OSError: [Errno 24] Too
many open files
Can you check with ulimit -a what your current limit is (it seems to
be 1024 on sage.math for example) and increase it and try again? The
sphinx build works for me with 256 max open files on OSX, so the
On Mar 16, 11:43 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
It might be, but this is the error reported: OSError: [Errno 24] Too
many open files
Can you check with ulimit -a what your current limit is (it seems to
be 1024 on sage.math for example) and increase it and try
On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
sage: integrate(y^2)
---
TypeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
TypeError: cannot coerce type 'type
On Monday 16 March 2009 02:51:30 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
sage: integrate(y^2)
-
-- TypeError Traceback (most recent call
last)
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Joel B. Mohler j...@kiwistrawberry.us wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 02:51:30 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
sage: integrate(y^2)
-
--
I assumed that Stirling numbers would be in Sage as part of sage-combinat
but it seems that we just wrap two GAP functions. Are we as fast as we
could be? And does Neil Sloane read any of our lists as he clearly does
pari-users?
John
PS also tere's a typo in the docstring of
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:37 PM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I assumed that Stirling numbers would be in Sage as part of sage-combinat
but it seems that we just wrap two GAP functions. Are we as fast as we
could be? And does Neil Sloane read any of our lists as he clearly does
I also came across the problem with quaternion_order_ideal.py, but for
me it went away when I re-built from a clean tarball (rather than
upgrading from 3.4.rc0 as I had done before). But even the final 3.4
tarball generates some Sphinx error messages when you do a docbuild,
from some slightly
On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Dom, 2009-03-15 às 17:11 -0700, kcrisman escreveu:
Wouldn't it be clearer if the error message read
NameError: name 't' is not defined, try var('t') beforehand
or something similar?
Perhaps as Carl deprecates common anticipated
On Mar 14, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
It sounds like the problems is the known issue that numpy does not
interact very well with Sage data types. Try this:
from numpy import *
import quantities as pq
res = 10r*pq.ohm
The 10r means to create a python integer, rather than a Sage
On Mar 16, 2009, at 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar
chyav...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Folks,
I am working my way through the Sage 3.4 Tutorial from my local
copy of
it, with sage running in a terminal.
I have encountered some
Hi there,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5535
adds a neat way of shooting yourself in the foot in the name of performance,
so I wonder if anyone has any hard feelings about that? I suggested to
include this in Sage (Ryan had a local version for his application), so I
think it is
On Mar 16, 1:43 pm, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
I also came across the problem with quaternion_order_ideal.py, but for
me it went away when I re-built from a clean tarball (rather than
upgrading from 3.4.rc0 as I had done before). But even the final 3.4
tarball
If I do search_doc(orbit) in sage 3.4 (in the notebook), I get
(amongst others) a link:
https://localhost:8000/doc/live/html/en/reference/genindex-F.html
which leads to a resource cannot be found. The appropriate link
seems to be
https://localhost:8000/doc/live/reference/genindex-F.html
It
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 at 07:13PM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
If I do search_doc(orbit) in sage 3.4 (in the notebook), I get
(amongst others) a link:
https://localhost:8000/doc/live/html/en/reference/genindex-F.html
which leads to a resource cannot be found. The appropriate link
seems to be
On Mar 16, 7:27 pm, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 at 07:13PM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
If I do search_doc(orbit) in sage 3.4 (in the notebook), I get
(amongst others) a link:
https://localhost:8000/doc/live/html/en/reference/genindex-F.html
which leads to a
David - thanks for the reply, and especially for the reminder to not
forget about R.
Ahmed - I'd like to use your application in the review. I'll contact
you off-list right now for more, but if you miss that, please be back
in contact.
Fredrik - glad we could help make your day. ;-)
More
52 matches
Mail list logo
