> In alpha2, m4ri fails to build on OS X 10.5 PPC (the computer in Craig
> Citro's office). I'm trying rc0 now:
>
Ah, I really need to get an account on that machine one day. (I'm not
kidding -- I don't actually have one.) Also, I should find out the
hostname so I can ssh in. William, do you hav
On Jun 15, 7:59 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> > Nick is right that rebuilding the docs is a pain. But as has been
> > pointed out before, you can rebuild the HTML version once in a new
> > branch, then only changed files get rebuilt the next time.
>
> make ptestlong does not appear to benefit from
> Nick is right that rebuilding the docs is a pain. But as has been
> pointed out before, you can rebuild the HTML version once in a new
> branch, then only changed files get rebuilt the next time.
make ptestlong does not appear to benefit from this. I get some
rubbish about "configuration ha
I was looking through the "tasks" on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
sage-announce since February.
While searching around, I found that the release tours on the wiki
sometimes link to a nonexistent release note: in
http://wik
On Jun 15, 4:22 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> people should be
> checking that the reference manual builds correctly before submitting
> their patches, and then also before submitting positive reviews for
> someone else's patches.
I agree 100% with John's comments on this, and he is right that
A simple fix by moving out the code that does the literals (the part
that changes 1/2 to Integer(1)/Integer(2)) into a separate function
and made sure its called at each load.
I used my shiny new trac account to add the patch to the Trac.
Rado
On Jun 15, 6:53 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue,
64-bit Ubuntu 8.10 on Intel Core Duo
All tests passed as upgrade from 4.0.2.rc0
Builds from source for both 4.0.2.rc0 and 4.0.2.rc1 yield as a final
message the curious:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py
# 0 doctests failed
The l
On Jun 15, 5:15 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 12:13 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> >> Hi all,
>
> >> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> > The following response to this release announcement was autogenerat
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 at 12:17AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> This was my first patch
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
>>
>> so things did not go quite to plan. The basic code works, but 'ddrake'
>> commented I'd put too many stars in the SPGK.txt, as they
Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
On Ubuntu 9.04 on an EeePC 901 with Atom N270:
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module.py"
sage -t -long
"devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/num
On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Jun 15, 12:13 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> The following response to this release announcement was autogenerated
> by the Sage docbot:
>
> "Someone didn't format thei
Hi,
I've created sage-4.0.2.rc1 which is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/release/4.0.2/rc1/sage-4.0.2.rc1/dist/sage-4.0.2.rc1.tar
You can upgrade by doing
sage -upgrade
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/release/4.0.2/rc1/sage-4.0.2.rc1/
The todo list to finish
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 at 12:17AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> This was my first patch
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
>
> so things did not go quite to plan. The basic code works, but 'ddrake'
> commented I'd put too many stars in the SPGK.txt, as they were
> supposed to be a
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> This was my first patch
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
>
> so things did not go quite to plan. The basic code works, but 'ddrake'
> commented I'd put too many stars in the SPGK.txt, as they were supposed
> to be a for
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Pogon wrote:
>
> yes, you're right, just tested it, works when replacing 1/2 by .5
>
> so, will this get fixed?
This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6305
William
>
> maybe someone with more dev-knowledge could trac a bug ...
>
> On Jun 15,
All tests pass under 64-bit Fedora 10.
Kiran
On Jun 15, 3:13 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
>
> We merged all of the tickets with positive review on trac (save one
> that
On Jun 15, 12:13 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
The following response to this release announcement was autogenerated
by the Sage docbot:
"Someone didn't format their reST correctly, so building the reference
manual now produces wa
This was my first patch
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6266
so things did not go quite to plan. The basic code works, but 'ddrake'
commented I'd put too many stars in the SPGK.txt, as they were supposed
to be a for list. He changed the sPKG.txt file, made a package. My code
worked
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Bill Hart wrote:
Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
>>
>> I've never used it, but I guess it must be really really important in
>>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:33 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Does the release of an rc0 mean that 4.0.2 is closed to new patches?
Yes, I think it does. But don't worry 4.0.3 is only moments away :-).
William
>
> I have one at #4290 (new feature, but not too important), a bug fix at
> #5307 (Tate's
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Fernando Perez wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
>> some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
>
>
> Does "you" mean "people attending scipy09", or does it mea
yes, you're right, just tested it, works when replacing 1/2 by .5
so, will this get fixed?
maybe someone with more dev-knowledge could trac a bug ...
On Jun 15, 11:18 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I'm not sure what is happening but I would guess that at some point
> the ^(1/2) gets turned into
On 15 June, 17:48, javier wrote:
> This looks like good news for sage:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
The idea of rewriting of Python's VM to use LLVM is a similar goal to
that of Parrot's VM (http://www.parrot.org/). What makes it more
interesting is that they pla
The error isn't in your code, I've duplicated this with much simpler code.
{{{
%cython
from sage.rings.all import CC
def foo(z):
return CC(z)
}}}
{{{
complex_plot(foo,(0,1),(0,1))
///
Traceback (click to the left for traceback)
...
TypeError: a float is required
}}}
{{{
complex_plot(lambda
I only got the known singular.pyx and and number_field_element.pyx
failures on an intel mac running 10.4.11.
-M. Hampton
On Jun 15, 1:13 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
>
>
I'm not sure what is happening but I would guess that at some point
the ^(1/2) gets turned into ^(0), and then your standard deviation
goes from .06... to 1. I.e., it seems like maybe the preparser
doesn't catch these nested loadings.
-M. Hampton
On Jun 15, 1:54 pm, Pogon wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm no
Hi,
I'm not sure if it's a bug or it's me doing something wrong.
I have two files:
test1.sage containing nothing but
print numpy.random.normal(0,(2*0.0061*0.33)^(1/2),1)
and
test2.sage containing
load "test1.sage"
I import numpy
sage: import numpy
Now
sage: load "test1.sage"
returns v
On 15 Jun 2009, at 03:13, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
On OS X 10.5 Intel, four tests failed. The first two failures were
exactly as already reported by William Stein:
Thanks Nick -- 2 out of three reviewed in under 10 minutes must set a
record! It's the quality of the patches which counts, of course.
John
2009/6/15 John Cremona :
> Does the release of an rc0 mean that 4.0.2 is closed to new patches?
>
> I have one at #4290 (new feature, but not too important
Does the release of an rc0 mean that 4.0.2 is closed to new patches?
I have one at #4290 (new feature, but not too important), a bug fix at
#5307 (Tate's algorithm over number fields) and a post-review mini
patch at #6273 waiting for a mini review
John
--~--~-~--~~~-
On Jun 15, 3:03 am, William Stein wrote:
> Just out of curiosity what computes the layout of the graph? Does
> Sage give the vertex positions, then tikz takes care of the *text
> labels* and edge positions? Or can tikz actually plot a layout?
The tkz-graph package is really more about presenta
I just tried to implement a quick, fast mandelbrot set plot. I posted
my results (with the puzzling error) here: http://sagenb.org/home/pub/578/
The error that I get is that when passing a Cython-created CC number to
complex_plot, I get an error "float required"---something about the
fast_flo
On Jun 15, 9:57 am, William Stein wrote:
> File
> "/Users/was/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/birds_other.rst",
> line 212:
> sage: w = bernoulli(10, num_threads=16) # 1.87 seconds
> Exception raised:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
[...]
This is now
On Jun 15, 10:34 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Also, a google search for hadamard product applications turns up
> http://buzzard.ups.edu/courses/2007spring/projects/million-paper.pdf
> (maybe Rob Beezer knows this person?)
Elizabeth Million was a student in a course of mine a few years ago
and this w
2009/6/15 John Cremona :
> 2009/6/15 Nick Alexander :
>>
That is on old issue: L.primes_above(6) tries to sort the primes but
there are tie-break situations where the order is not determined;
and
pari's output is often different on 32-or 64-bit machines. Unless
someone ca
On 15 Jun 2009, at 03:13, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
libm4ri failed to build on a G4 PowerBook with OS X 10.5:
checking the number of available CPUs... 1
checking the num
2009/6/15 Nick Alexander :
>
>>> That is on old issue: L.primes_above(6) tries to sort the primes but
>>> there are tie-break situations where the order is not determined;
>>> and
>>> pari's output is often different on 32-or 64-bit machines. Unless
>>> someone can come up with a reliable way of
Jason Grout wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> Bill Hart wrote:
Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
>> I've never used it, but I guess it must be really really important in
>> numerical computation, since most shoc
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Bill Hart wrote:
>>> Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
>
> I've never used it, but I guess it must be really really important in
> numerical computation, since most shockingly it is the *defaul
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> Bill Hart wrote:
>>> Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
>
> I've never used it, but I guess it must be really really important in
> numerical computation, since most shockingly it is the *defaul
>> That is on old issue: L.primes_above(6) tries to sort the primes but
>> there are tie-break situations where the order is not determined;
>> and
>> pari's output is often different on 32-or 64-bit machines. Unless
>> someone can come up with a reliable way of sorting primes in a number
>> f
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Bill Hart wrote:
>> Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
I've never used it, but I guess it must be really really important in
numerical computation, since most shockingly it is the *default* for
A*B in numpy!!
sage: imp
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Golam Mortuza
Hossain wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>>
>>> (2) keyword "latex_name": If I understand correctly, the new
>>> "SFunction" class can be given keyboard argument
>>> "latex_name=LaTeX". It would be really cool
Bill Hart wrote:
> Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
(Tim: The term is from linear algebra)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication#Hadamard_product says
it is used in JPG compression, for example.
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/HadamardProduct.html
Also,
On Jun 15, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
>
> Bill.
I've never heard it called that, but element-wise multiplication
is useful for tensors.
Cheers,
Tim.
---
Tim Lahey
PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering
University of Wate
John Cremona wrote:
> Built fine and passed all tests on 64-bit Ubuntu.
>
> Built fine, 2 test failyres on 32-bit Suse: the singular.pyx issue
> already reported, and
>
> **
> File
> "/local/jec/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> (2) keyword "latex_name": If I understand correctly, the new
>> "SFunction" class can be given keyboard argument
>> "latex_name=LaTeX". It would be really cool if we could define a
>> symbolic function as
>>
>> riemann(x) = fun
Can I ask what applications this "Hadamard product" has?
Bill.
On 15 June, 17:32, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > 2009/6/15 Jason Grout :
>
> >> William Stein wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, paramaniac
> >>> wrote:
> > Sorry,
Should we take this as a sign that raising awareness of a project on
the sage devel list is a good way to raise its profile generally and
make it happen.
I think so!! ;-)
(or we could just say if you are google and you have lots of money you
can make all manner of interesting things happen.)
B
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:01 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Built fine and passed all tests on 64-bit Ubuntu.
>
> Built fine, 2 test failyres on 32-bit Suse: the singular.pyx issue
> already reported, and
>
> **
> File
> "/local/je
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:48 PM, javier wrote:
>
> This looks like good news for sage:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
Deja vu:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/cc860333635b8aa5/9f0724949f7bbb92
-- William
--~--~-~--~~---
Built fine and passed all tests on 64-bit Ubuntu.
Built fine, 2 test failyres on 32-bit Suse: the singular.pyx issue
already reported, and
**
File
"/local/jec/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_elem
2009/6/15 William Stein :
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> It built fine for me (on top of 4.0.1) -- is that enough for a positive
>> review?
>
> It would be nice if you looked in the spkg and verified that:
>
>
> * SPKG.txt looks good
>
> * there is an hg repo
>
> *
This looks like good news for sage:
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.c
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> It built fine for me (on top of 4.0.1) -- is that enough for a positive
> review?
It would be nice if you looked in the spkg and verified that:
* SPKG.txt looks good
* there is an hg repo
* the spkg-install file doesn't install a keylo
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> 2009/6/15 Jason Grout :
>>
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, paramaniac wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand your example.
> If
> A1 = matrix([[a1,b1],[c1,d1]])
> A2 = matrix([[a2,b2],[c2,d2]])
>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:47 PM, dmitrey wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> OpenOpt 0.24, a free Python-written numerical optimization framework
> with some own solvers and connections to tens of 3rd party ones, has
> been released.
>
> BSD license allows to use it in both free opensource and commercial
> close
2009/6/15 Jason Grout :
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, paramaniac wrote:
Sorry, I don't understand your example.
If
A1 = matrix([[a1,b1],[c1,d1]])
A2 = matrix([[a2,b2],[c2,d2]])
then
>>> A1.*A2 = matrix([[a1*a2, b1*b2],[c1*c2, d1*d2]])
>>>
>>
It built fine for me (on top of 4.0.1) -- is that enough for a positive review?
John
2009/6/15 William Stein :
>
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> I was sitting next to John Abbott (of the Cocoa project) at a
> conference today (MEGA), and we started chatting. It was pretty
> embarasing that there *still* i
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, paramaniac wrote:
>>> Sorry, I don't understand your example.
>>> If
>>> A1 = matrix([[a1,b1],[c1,d1]])
>>> A2 = matrix([[a2,b2],[c2,d2]])
>>> then
>> A1.*A2 = matrix([[a1*a2, b1*b2],[c1*c2, d1*d2]])
>>
>
> (1) we aren't going to add the .*
> (1) we aren't going to add the .* notation A1 .* A2 to sage, since
> there has to be a *very* very strong
+1 to not adding this.
> (2) I would love to add a fast optimized function that does multiply
> component wise.
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6301
Nick
--~--~---
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, paramaniac wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I don't understand your example.
>> If
>> A1 = matrix([[a1,b1],[c1,d1]])
>> A2 = matrix([[a2,b2],[c2,d2]])
>> then
>
> A1.*A2 = matrix([[a1*a2, b1*b2],[c1*c2, d1*d2]])
>
(1) we aren't going to add the .* notation A1 .* A2 to sage, sin
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Martin
Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Monday 15 June 2009, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Martin
>>
>> Albrecht wrote:
>> >> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx"
>> >> *
Hi Sage-Devel,
There is a talk right now at MEGA about "Dynamic Galois Theory" (lazy
arithmetic in QQbar!). It's an IMHO horribly misnamed topic described
here: http://hlombardi.free.fr/publis/GaloisDynamic09.pdf
It's really basically how to use Groebner basis to do lazy
computations in splitti
> Sorry, I don't understand your example.
> If
> A1 = matrix([[a1,b1],[c1,d1]])
> A2 = matrix([[a2,b2],[c2,d2]])
> then
A1.*A2 = matrix([[a1*a2, b1*b2],[c1*c2, d1*d2]])
Regards,
Lukas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegr
Dear Sage Developers,
It would be very nice if Sage supported the element-wise
multiplication of matrices like the .* operator in Octave/Matlab.
EXAMPLE:
sigma, tau, beta = var('sigma tau beta')
A = matrix([[-1/tau, sigma/tau],[sigma/tau, -1/tau]])
B = matrix([[beta/tau, 0],[0, beta/tau]])
C =
On Monday 15 June 2009, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Martin
>
> Albrecht wrote:
> >> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx"
> >> **
> >> File
> >> "/Users/was/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/dev
paramaniac wrote:
> Dear Sage Developers,
>
> It would be very nice if Sage supported the element-wise
> multiplication of matrices like the .* operator in Octave/Matlab.
>
I was about to point out the recent thread about this, but then realized
it was you that started that thread and acknowl
Sorry, I don't understand your example.
If
A1 = matrix([[a1,b1],[c1,d1]])
A2 = matrix([[a2,b2],[c2,d2]])
then
A1.*A2 =
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:52 AM, paramaniac wrote:
>
> Dear Sage Developers,
>
> It would be very nice if Sage supported the element-wise
> multiplication of matrices lik
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I ran across the following behavior in sage-3.4.1 and sage-4.0 (I
don't
have 4.0.1 yet), and I find it fairly disturbing.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Martin
Albrecht wrote:
>
>> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx"
>> **
>> File
>> "/Users/was/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx
>>", line 501:
>>
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> nitu wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I am trying to build sage-4.0.1 and getting the following error:
>> Build environment :
>> #uname -a
>> SunOS smath01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
>> Compiler used:
>> Sunstudio 12
>>
>> cfg/shared.c: In function `store_s
> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx"
> **
> File
> "/Users/was/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx
>", line 501:
> sage: P(2^32-1)
> Expected:
> -1
> Got:
> 429496729
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>>> Excellent!
>>>
>>> Once/if you get Sage running on it, will students of mine (<100 total)
>>> be able to use it
>>> and share their assignments with me?
>>
>> Y
SAGE-4.0.2:
On OS X 10.5 Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu) the following 3 tests fail:
sage -t -long "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/birds_other.rst"
A mysterious error (perhaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
crashed doctest.
[23.2 s]
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singu
Hi Sage-Devel,
I was sitting next to John Abbott (of the Cocoa project) at a
conference today (MEGA), and we started chatting. It was pretty
embarasing that there *still* isn't a cocoalib spkg. I don't know
how we've been so lazy not to make one.Anyways, I just made one
and posted a link t
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Dr. David
>
>>> Could one or both of you verify you pick up gcc 4.4.0 when you log in,
>>> and
>>> that the compiler will compile a simple c program. It should be ok, but
>>> no
>
William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>> Excellent!
>>
>> Once/if you get Sage running on it, will students of mine (<100 total)
>> be able to use it
>> and share their assignments with me?
>
> You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
Couldn't you have a
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, davidloeffler wrote:
>
> Is there a copy anywhere we can use with sage -upgrade?
>
You could use the clean build I just made:
sage -upgrade
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/
William
--~--~-~--~~~---~-
Is there a copy anywhere we can use with sage -upgrade?
David
On Jun 15, 9:13 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
>
> We merged all of the tickets with positive review on trac
Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
> some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
Does "you" mean "people attending scipy09", or does it mean "sage
developers, whether or not you are attending scipy09"?
#x27;s the line that triggers it:
>
> ax_l2_size=$((0`$sysctl_exe -n hw.l2cachesize 2>/dev/null` / 1024))
>
> in src/m4/ax_cache_size.m4.
>
> sysctrl reports 524288 which looks about right. It seems the shell tries to
> interpret the value as octal because we add a leading
OK, I'll try to improve it then.
-Marshall
On Jun 14, 11:10 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 14-Jun-09, at 8:56 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
>
>
> > I care, I have written div and curl routines for my multivariable calc
> > classes before, but they were more hackish than yours. I will try to
>
))
in src/m4/ax_cache_size.m4.
sysctrl reports 524288 which looks about right. It seems the shell tries to
interpret the value as octal because we add a leading zero. Can you try:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/spkgs/libm4ri-20090615.spkg
?
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: h
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Golam Mortuza
Hossain wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> There were long discussion about the typesetting of partial derivatives
>> in the new system, but I don't think we got to a conclusion yet.
>
> I am afraid, we might n
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
> I care about the polymake spkg, and I know a few users who do too. It
> would be nice to fix it; the last time I tried to install it I got
> some errors I didn't understand at all so I'm not sure what exactly
> the problem is. Its prob
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> The tkz-graph package for LaTeX has many options for rendering a
> (combinatorial) graph. Version 4.0.2alpha of Sage will have support
> for selecting these options and creating LaTeX code for graphs - which
> can be used in your own document
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM, nitu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I am trying to build sage-4.0.1 and getting the following error:
> Build environment :
> #uname -a
> SunOS smath01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
> Compiler used:
> Sunstudio 12
>
> cfg/shared.c: In function `store_
Hi William,
Thanks for replying, I am using gcc 3.4.6 not sunstudio 12 for
building sage, sorry for the confusion. My project involves building
sage on both soalris 10 as well as opensolaris on various x64
platforms. What I should do now, where from can I get gcc-4.3.2 and
custom binutils, please
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, maxthemouse wrote:
>
>
>>
>> > Another thing that does not work is "sage -
>> > lisp" which gave the clisp prompt. I found this rather convenient
>> > since I could just use the clisp within sage. Is there any plan/
>> > interest to switch the this lisp interface t
Hi Burcin,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:49:29 +
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
>> #6268: Burcin Erocal: Typesetting of sec(x), csc(x), cot(x) are broken
>> [Reviewed by Nick Alexander]
>
> Credit for this should go to John Palmieri. In my late n
> In alpha2, m4ri fails to build on OS X 10.5 PPC (the computer in Craig
> Citro's office). I'm trying rc0 now:
>
> checking mm_malloc.h presence... no
> checking for mm_malloc.h... no
> checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
> checking the number of available CPUs... 1
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 at 12:13AM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
>>
>> We merged all of the tickets with positive review on trac
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:49:29 +
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> #6268: Burcin Erocal: Typesetting of sec(x), csc(x), cot(x) are broken
> [Reviewed by Nick Alexander]
Credit for this should go to John Palmieri. In my late night effort to
quickly fix this, I didn't notice that his patch essentially does
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 at 12:13AM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/ncalexan/releases
>
> We merged all of the tickets with positive review on trac (save one
> that depended on a still-unreviewed ticket),
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> == List of closed tickets ==
>
> This will come with the release email for the next rc; if you want to
> see it right away, it's here:
>
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=closed&group=resolution&milestone=sage-4.0.2
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:12:26AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> As many of us have stated on IRC and elsewhere, lots of us reviewing
> the categories stuff got burned out after Sage days and then busy
> with lots of other stuff. There's lots of good code here that should
>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:01 AM, nitu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I am trying to build sage-4.0.1 and getting the following error:
> Build environment :
> #uname -a
> SunOS smath01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
> Compiler used:
> Sunstudio 12
Building Sage using the Sun Studio c
Hi All,
I am trying to build sage-4.0.1 and getting the following error:
Build environment :
#uname -a
SunOS smath01 5.10 Generic_137137-09 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
Compiler used:
Sunstudio 12
cfg/shared.c: In function `store_single_arg':
cfg/shared.c:727: error: wrong type argument to unar
Hi all,
In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get
some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a
couple of minutes to fill out (no password or registration required):
http://doodle.com/hb5bea6fivm3b5bk
So please let us know which topics you are mos
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
