On 08/10/2015 08:38 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 11:42:16 AM UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote:
I agree with you: from a technical point of view this is stupid.
It is not. There is no security without the chain of trust. Maybe in a
parallel universe where everybody is
On 08/10/2015 11:34 AM, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Let me propose something less stupid: the first time you access to a
website you have to accept the certificate manually (if you wish you can
have a look at the fingerprint). Then, until it changes nothing happens
(the very same way ssh
On 08/09/2015 07:09 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
Yes, though we don't have a certificate for *.sagemath.org. Besides the
cost, you also need to periodically renew etc. Though I'm hoping that
Let's Encrypt (https://letsencrypt.org) will fix that. Launching this
September...
Just use a self-signed
On 07/31/2015 07:51 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Hello,
While working on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18613 I ran into the
following problem:
Argh, the trac notifications still aren't fixed. Can someone please add
a reverse DNS entry for 128.208.160.253 (the server that's sending the
On 07/31/2015 07:06 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
You don't need a closing tag that can be inserted by software,
as certainly is the case for \section or \item..
(unless you spent a large part of your life writing HTML or XML by hand,
of course :-))
The parser can insert them for you, but
On 07/20/2015 01:08 PM, Benjamin Hackl wrote:
... might be just here at AAU. I found my notifications in the spam folder.
The new host is missing reverse DNS.
Jul 20 14:07:35 mx1 postfix/smtpd[23912]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[128.208.160.253]: 550 5.7.1 Client host rejected:
On 06/19/2015 11:31 AM, Christian Stump wrote:
The mirror list is downloaded from http://www.sagemath.org/mirror_list
Is it true that among the needed resources, only www.sagemath.org is
or will be any time soon located anywhere where I cannot assume a
relatively constant IP ?
If the
I just noticed in
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18701
that the methods within the SEEALSO block for codim() aren't being
linked in the HTML docs. I don't see anything different between that
block and the one for e.g. is_proper() in the same class.
Did I overlook something in the docstring
On 06/14/2015 03:42 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
To link to a method in another class, you should do either
...
Well that explains it. I've been working in that file for a month and
never realized there was more than one class defined. Since my new
method uses only superclass methods, I guess
On 06/11/2015 02:55 PM, Francesco Biscani wrote:
Not sure what you mean by that. I have worked in the past for a
multinational company (100k employees) on software which costs hundreds
of thousands of dollars per license, and never heard of that. I am not
an assembly guy but I would think
For whatever it's worth, I have the same issue. The mathjax stuff looks
like it's working, but then when processing hits 100%, all of the latex
is replaced with [Math Processing Error]. I have the following in my JS
console:
Error: TypeError: c.FONTDATA.FONTS.MathJax_Main[8212][5] is undefined
On 05/14/2015 12:05 PM, leif wrote:
Well, symlinking the folders in html/en/ on the top level should be
sufficient.
A RedirectMatch permanent would be better -- with symlinks, Google
will keep the old URLs around forever (and penalize you for duplicate
content).
--
You received this
On 05/09/2015 09:44 AM, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
The thing, is that with
sage: f(x) = max(sin(x), cos(x))
one would expect the function x - max(sin(x), cos(x))
But because how 'max' is implemented in Python this is not possible. One
solution is to
1. create a dedicated symbolic_max
On 04/23/2015 04:56 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Can't we work with upstream (the authors) to package these?
For starters, none of these seem very active projects. In particular,
hyperellfrob and bernmm have their last release in 2008 and 2009.
Second, what if the authors don't care?
There
.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
From 6b8d9f4c2cecb201ef617da0d667a9543e463b06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:19:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Update simplerw.c to support igraph = 0.6.
Newer versions
On 03/06/2015 04:51 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
Yet this stopgap is not in a class in the global namespace, but a
low-level class that almost always gets passed valid input. I am for having
checks for valid input (and most of the time it does error out), but there
is only one place I
On 03/06/2015 08:10 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
This is a serious bug. Is there a ticket for this?
It sort of falls under this one:
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7392
even though a fix for that ticket might not affect some similar examples.
--
You received this message because you are
On 02/25/2015 02:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
toys.eratosthenes()
or possibly eratosthenes_toy()...
In this case, the name refers to the implementation, not the
functionality, so I don't think it's a big deal. It's not a prime
number routine that just happens to be slow -- it's the
On 02/25/2015 12:55 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Hello,
Should there be code in Sage which is extremely slow and for educational
purposes only? I am talking about eratosthenes() which is just a very
slow alternative to prime_range().
I would just remove that code, but maybe people have
On 02/25/2015 03:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Any other implementation will be just as slow.
I'm not sure I agree. This eratosthenes function is pure Python code.
It would probably be 100 times faster if rewritten in Cython using
int's or long's. In fact, this is (more or less) the
On 02/20/2015 11:02 AM, kcrisman wrote:
I no longer use sage for my day-to-day work, but when I was and I had to
e.g. give a presentation, it was infuriating to find sage broken AGAIN
??? I assume this is because you updated some dependency and Sage didn't
work quite properly
On 02/19/2015 03:49 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le 19/02/2015 18:54, Michael Orlitzky a écrit :
This presupposes that the status quo is not madness. My sage builds work
for about two weeks before some invisible dependency update breaks them.
There's a line in sage beyond which we just don't care
On 02/19/2015 09:21 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I don't think software was ever delayed for debian.
If people are against #16997 because it's not compatible with Debian,
then Debian is *already* slowing down Sage.
It's not incompatibility with Debian that's the problem. Having
dependencies
On 02/19/2015 11:24 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2015-02-19 16:55, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
It's not incompatibility with Debian that's the problem. Having
dependencies like whatever was in the git repo at 11:00 on 2015-02-19
UTC-5 leads to madness.
Why madness?
If you try to have sage
Hello, I've got a ticket at,
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17556
that affects one test in,
doc/de/thematische_anleitungen/sage_gymnasium.rst
I don't speak German, and the fix is going to require a sentence or two
of new/removed text. I offered one good fix and one lazy fix on the
ticket,
On 01/12/2015 05:59 AM, Thierry wrote:
In order to try such possibility on the next matplotlib update, could some
people (especially someone using OSX) give me (with minimal info on their
OS, arch, and tar --version) the result of:
wget
On 12/19/2014 10:14 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
On Friday, December 19, 2014 4:03:44 PM UTC+1, Bruno Grenet wrote:
I've changed recently the status of a ticket to needs review since I
think it is not relevant anymore, and I wanted it to be closed. I now
guess it is not the right
I am using a VirtualBox Sage-6.2 and wanted to upgrade sage.
It failed trying to build conway_polynomials.
[sage@sagevm ~]$ python -m bitset
/usr/bin/python: No module named bitset
[sage@sagevm ~]$ python -V
Python 2.6.6
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-4) (GCC)
[X] No -- do not adopt the code of conduct stated below
Grammar mismatch, line 1:
The Sage community is comprised of
^
One of comprises, is composed of, or consists of would be better.
(This was not the only factor affecting my vote.)
--
You received this message
On 11/05/2014 08:34 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Just to clarify, current behavior is
sage: a = sqrt(x^2)
sage: a.simplify_radical()
x
Yeah, previously, simplify_radical() was silently setting the domain to
'real', calling radcan(), and then setting the domain back to 'complex'.
The round trip
On 10/31/2014 05:54 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
Dear all,
Should we go on stripping down upstream tarballs from stuff we don't use
when there is some substantial gain?
See http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17169 (GCC) and
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15015 (MPIR).
We can debate forever
In http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14630, I have a patch that adds a
simplify_real() method to symbolic expressions. Pretty much the only
thing it does is simplify,
sqrt(x^2) - abs(x)
In the past, you could obtain this with simplify_radical(), even though
the variable `x` involved was assumed
Is it possible to reopen a closed ticket? #8005 was closed without a
doctest, so I've added one. But now it won't let me change the status to
needs_review again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
On 10/28/2014 09:33 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-10-28 14:30, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Is it possible to reopen a closed ticket? #8005 was closed without a
doctest, so I've added one. But now it won't let me change the status to
needs_review again.
Open a new ticket instead.
Ok
On 10/23/2014 10:49 PM, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
but it seems that init.sage is not loaded afterwards before tests. Do we
agree that init.sage should be loaded by sage -t when run on local files ?
It used to be loaded even with `sage -t`, but I think the current
default is probably safer
On 10/06/2014, at 1738, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Right now I'm reinstalling Xcode from scratch, in the hope that this will fix
it (as opposed to using the Xcode upgrade made when upgrading from 10.6 to
Mavericks). If that works, I'll report it.
That might work.
You need to
On 10/06/2014, at 1738, john_perry_usm john.pe...@usm.edu wrote:
Mavericks is up-to-date; extra packages installed. I'm not finding an option
for command-line tools in Preferences-Downloads as per the README,
Here's your problem - you're reading the readme in the wrong place (this is the
ML
On 9/05/2014, at 2005, Oskar Till oskar.e.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I should try and build from source then. How do I uninstall the version
I have now, is it enough to just drag the Applications/sage folder into the
trash?
Yes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On 05/09/2014 07:10 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Hello,
I've rebased a branch on top of 6.2, which went fine (branch just adds a
file), but then I couldn't push it via git push ... or git trac push
with git insisting that I have to pull. While that worked, it
automatically created an empty
On 28/04/2014, at 1809, Andrew andrew.mat...@gmail.com wrote:
sh: line 1: 45940 Trace/BPT trap: 5
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/xcodebuild -sdk / -find
strip 2 /dev/null
xcrun: error: unable to find utility strip, not a developer tool or in PATH
install: child
On 04/26/2014 08:57 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 6:17:00 PM UTC-4, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
If we try to plot some values in sage on a loglog scale where there
will
be fewer than 2 ticks on the (say) x-axis, it throws a ValueError:
...
Does
On 04/27/2014 04:57 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
This is strange. Two of my earlier messages got deleted. Does anyone
know why? Perhaps because I only wrote the URL to the ticket?
Getting back to the question, this was fixed two years ago and is
awaiting a review. See #13422
Ah, thanks for
On 04/27/2014 07:16 PM, P Purkayastha wrote:
The patch is to do it automatically. It will raise an error *only* if
you give ticks manually, and what you give is insufficient (see the
examples in the doctests).
Another ticket #13528 is positively reviewed but depends on this patch.
So,
If we try to plot some values in sage on a loglog scale where there will
be fewer than 2 ticks on the (say) x-axis, it throws a ValueError:
ValueError: Either expand the range of the independent variable to
allow two different integer powers of your `base`, or change your
`base` to a
On 20/04/2014, at 0853, Justin C. Walker jus...@mac.com wrote:
it means that you can't. I don't recall when Apple stopped supporting
Rosetta (the mechanism used to run PPC code on x86 CPUs). It's available on
10.6, but it's definitely not on 10.9 (Mavericks).
10.7.
--
You received this
On 04/09/2014 03:26 PM, leif wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/heartbleed-serious-openssl-zero-day-vulnerability-revealed-728166/
Apparently this is a real vulnerability in OpenSSL.
We should certainly update the optional OpenSSL spkg (last updated on
trac to 1.0.1c, Volker
On 21/03/2014, at 1751, Andrew andrew.mat...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I can see sage is compiling and running on mavericks. From those
who have made the switch,would you recommend upgrading to mavericks?
Yes.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 02/20/2014 12:14 PM, Niles Johnson wrote:
There are a number of ideas on the askbot support site
http://askbot.org/en/question/7893/suggestions-for-antispam-measures/
but I don't know which of them are available in our version of askbot
(roughly 1 year old).
I have a bit of
On 01/31/2014 11:33 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Hi,
Check this out: http://i.imgur.com/sbNIk6J.png
I *literally* cannot read this mail, because my monitor is not large
enough for the message body to even appear in my mail client! :) Even
View Source doesn't work, since the thing is
- get the source code,
type make, release that folder.
The other (app) version is built with SAGE_APP_BUNDLE=yes.
HTH,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
On 01/12/2014 02:06 PM, Felix Salfelder wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:09:42PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Prefix is designed to run as an ordinary user on non-gentoo systems. If
you're on gentoo, you don't need it (unless you don't have root). Plenty
of us have been able to get
On 01/12/2014 04:16 AM, Javier López Peña wrote:
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 2:20:03 AM UTC, William wrote:
Thanks for reminding people of conda. One issue is that Sage's build
system is far more than just for installing Python package -- it's
much, much more (e.g., Gap,
On 01/12/2014 12:03 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 6:41:21 AM UTC-10, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
At this point I must conjure the semi-regular reminder that
cross-platform homebrew already exists in the form of Gentoo Prefix.
We are aware of gentoo prefix
On 01/12/2014 03:51 PM, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
I'm a fan of gentoo's package manager specification (PMS) [1], however
the only package manager that is fully compliant is portage, which I
don't think is appropriate for sage. In particular:
Keep in mind that the alternative is a bunch of
On 12/18/2013 11:59 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2013-12-18 08:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
7. But since the u/johndoe/tracabcde branch misses everything that went
into Sage in between 6.1 and 6.2, I suppose the first thing I now should do
is:
git merge --no-edit 6.2
Yep.
Didn't Volker
On 12/18/2013 05:01 PM, Simon King wrote:
Isn't rebasing even worse than an occasional merge commit? If I recall
correctly, gits claim that rebasing a published branch means to change
the history of the branch and is very evil.
You should try not to change the history of a public branch that
On 12/18/2013 05:58 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
But if you push this then the original author won't be able to cleanly
pull your rebase. It gets worse if people are depending on this ticket
for further development.
If nothing in 6.2 affects the branch in question, the commits can still
be
On 12/17/2013 03:29 PM, John Cremona wrote:
Could someone point me to the instructions for converting an old
non-git ticket with mercurial patches to a new-style ticket where
there's a git branch instead? I am sure that I read it somewhere but
cannot find it.
It's the same as starting a new
On 12/17/2013 04:52 PM, John Cremona wrote:
Thanks to all. I'll try out the import-patch tomorrow. I will not
try to use sage-dev to attach to the ticket, I'll just push to trac
and update the trac fields myself.
The git workflow is a lot less weird than the hg one was. After the
initial
On 16/11/2013, at 2126, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2013-10-23 02:48, yomcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 10:48:00 UTC+13, yomcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 October 2013 10:04:57 UTC+13, yomcat wrote:
I'll go hunting for dev tools.
On 11/12/2013 12:29 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
This is maddening.
Why is this so maddening? Are you out of room on your hard drive? It
took too long to build? It offends your sense of aesthetics?
Yes, yes, and yes. But there's more:
* Bundling libraries are terrible for security. I should
/sage-test/logs/pkgs/singular-3-1-5.p9.log
build directory: /Users/yomcat/Desktop/sage-test/spkg/build/singular-3-1-5.p9
All the logs are at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/pmzh03082qe4nu1/OGfJ0z9H6W/logs
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel
On 10/19/2013 02:18 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC
A To header should be enough here.
Second, reverse dns doesn't work. This nets us a RDNS_NONE penalty:
$ host trac.sagemath.org
trac.sagemath.org is an alias for trac.sagedev.org.
trac.sagedev.org has address
On 10/03/2013 11:54 AM, Greg Laun wrote:
Out of curiosity, I decided to ask sage what it thought the imaginary
part of infinity was. I'm not quite sure that this should return 0.
Mathematica returns Indeterminate, which seems like a better answer to me.
Has this been discussed elsewhere?
On 09/13/2013 02:10 PM, Greg Laun wrote:
I have a student who specializes in 3d graphics (in particular writing
very fast physics and game engines) who has expressed interest in
contributing to Sage. From the sound of it, it would be very simple for
him to implement fast, responsive
.
Since I am potentially going to work on this can you point me to some
info on this in case it does exist?.
Cheers,
Burcin
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On 07/01/2013 03:37 PM, Joris Vankerschaver wrote:
sage: u = var('u')
sage: assume(u, 'real')
This makes an assumption in Maxima, where most of the symbolic algebra
takes place.
sage: u = var('u', domain='real')
This sets a flag in pynac, which does nothing as far as I can tell.
--
You
On 07/01/2013 03:55 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 07/01/2013 03:37 PM, Joris Vankerschaver wrote:
sage: u = var('u')
sage: assume(u, 'real')
This makes an assumption in Maxima, where most of the symbolic algebra
takes place.
sage: u = var('u', domain='real')
This sets a flag
On 06/19/2013 03:03 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Thanks for your explanation regarding how radcan works.
If radcan ignores assumptions, how can one explain the following behavior:
sage: assume(x0)
sage: sqrt(x^2).simplify_radical()
x
sage: maxima_calculus.eval('domain:real')
'real'
I reported this a long time ago when it was preventing me from building
the documentation. Now in 5.10.x (and maybe earlier, I haven't been
plotting anything for a while), it prevents me from creating plots:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12276
I guess I'm a corner case for using a
On 06/15/2013 11:31 AM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
Hi,
Here is some behavior of Sage which can be quite disturbing for a new
user and probably would be considered as a bug:
sage: assume(x0)
sage: sqrt(x^2).simplify_full()
x
I know that the problem is due to Maxima function randcan and
On 25/05/2013, at 1:09 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
And it has 100% doctest coverage. (It does, right?)
Yes, it does. We made sure of that before submitting.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this
with it...
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit
at position 8 in total number of citations which is not bad, considering it's
age.
Every feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
hidden, though it appears to change monthly, and it's different
if you're on Lion or Mountain Lion.
Best,
JP
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
the command line
tools alone as
stackoverflow.com/questions/9329243/xcode-4-4-command-line-toolssuggests?
It's not very hidden, though it appears to change monthly, and it's
different if you're on Lion or Mountain Lion.
Best,
JP
Michael
--
You received this message because you
/shm and I am too
lazy atm to take a look myself. Either way, POSIX demands /dev/shm to be
there, so you might want to talk to the provider of your build machine to
get that issue fixed ;).
Best regards,
Andrey
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:35 AM, pang pablo.ang...@uam.es wrote:
sudo rm -rf /dev/shm sudo **ln -s /run/shm /dev/shm
It really looked promising, but unfortunately, it didn't work: is a reboot
necessary?
Eh, it depends: What went wrong?
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message
On 03/14/2013 03:34 PM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 2013-03-14, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
--e89a8f83aa332c3afc04d7e540f8
No, the core example is inside a matrix
I don't understand what you mean by this.
A==B
False
A.simplify_rational()==B
True
That is not good. Worth
point?
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel
On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
We particularly would like people who don't even have
Sage.app to try this, since with multiple versions of Sage.app there can be
natural confusion as to which one is supposed to open the file, though in
principle this should
a .app on this machine or even sws files. The app that I just
copied on is the only thing that can open it (according to the right-click menu)
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On 13/02/2013, at 11:09 AM, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Michael Welsh yom...@yomcat.geek.nz wrote:
On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
sws files
On 1/02/2013, at 8:19 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds viable to me. Any other ideas? Presumably this can be considered a
problem, since we want people who know nothing about App Store prefs
downloading Sage :)
IIRC, the default setting is MAS and registered developers, so
On 01/16/2013 07:17 AM, Timo Kluck wrote:
This is true. I think the reason Sage is the way it is right now, is
that it wants to have a dependency system not only saying I depend
on... but also I depend on ... with these build flags ... and these
patches. Clearly, autotools and pkg-config
On 01/16/2013 12:30 PM, John Cremona wrote:
and a pile of other problems, chief among which is that you've got PhD
mathematicians wasting their time fixing CFLAGS.
-- which we may still do for fun, it being a whole lot easier than
supervising PhD students!
Disclaimer: I am a PhD student
On 01/15/2013 08:25 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Just curious - how would Mac fit in with all this? I know it's possible
to do some of these package things with it, but for the ordinary
user... or would one still in principle be able to download the Sage
source, disconnect from the Internet, type
On 01/15/2013 10:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
FreeBSD: pkg install subversion
...
Just went insane for a second there =)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
On 01/03/2013 02:21 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
3) I have started a new patch with hg qnew -m some message
trac_somenumber.
4) I make changes to a file within the development tree.
...
hg qrefresh?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel
.patch
user:Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com
date:Tue Jan 01 14:38:41 2013 -0500
summary: Trac #13897: Fix ArithmeticError: ...
But if you accidentally `cd` up one level to devel,
sage $ cd ..
devel $ sage -hg log -r -1
changeset: 226:1a7b91b38079
tag
On 12/15/2012 10:06 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 12/15/2012 08:51 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Just sayin'.
http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/12/14/214231/ask-slashdot-replacing-a-ti-84-with-software-on-a-linux-box
and then check the comments.
The original poster didn't like maxima,
I've been carrying this around in my init.sage. Is there really nothing
like it in the library? If not, any reason not to add it?
##
from functools import reduce
def product(factors):
Returns the product of the elements in the list ``factors``. If
the list is empty, we return 1.
On 12/04/2012 07:01 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
prod() does just what you want.
Duh, thanks. I swear I tried produtab.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
On 12/04/2012 09:31 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 12/4/12 6:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 12/04/2012 07:01 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
prod() does just what you want.
Duh, thanks. I swear I tried produtab.
Just FYI, the prod() function assumes your multiplication is associative
and often
On 12/03/2012 04:45 PM, William Stein wrote:
Yes, it was kind of frustrating. Basically, David advertised it a
lot, but at the end of the day, basically few people were available to
come to a Sage Days on improving the documentation, even with all
expenses paid...
If anybody reading this
I accidentally noticed that most of the doctests for this module were
testing the flint implementation instead:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13781
The patch is straight-forward, but there's a hidden issue that the
doctests should have caught:
sage: R.x =
This came up on another ticket:
sage: one = Zmod(5)(1)
sage: (one*5)^0
--
ArithmeticError
...
ArithmeticError: 0^0 is undefined.
Some of these were dealt with in,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10772
On 11/25/2012 09:25 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
Good news - it is said to be fixed in git (like 10 minutes ago). I will
test git version soon.
https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/code/ci/5ad2bf71294381da63cafdeded1e5e2de03aa936/
Anyway, is such cases (wrong answers), do we wait for
On 11/21/2012 11:34 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
The policy is to add examples and tests within your documentation. Look
up the source code of some function like
QQ??
plot??
integrate??
and so on. You will find both examples and tests listed there.
And one thing that's easy to miss
I just opened,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13720
intending to submit a patch a few minutes later, but I've hit a problem.
The current examples feature,
sage: legendre_P(3, GF(11)(5))
8
which works due to a quirk in Maxima's string representation of the
polynomial:
sage:
501 - 600 of 941 matches
Mail list logo
