[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-17 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 17, 3:13 pm, mabshoff wrote: > > One final comment: George's patch was unnecessary.  I > > hope I didn't send you on a wild goose chase. > > Nah, that was a real bug. > > I made thishttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5295 Good. One other little issue remains. When Sage.app quits,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-17 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 17, 12:07 pm, mark mcclure wrote: Hi Mark, > I finally got Sage.app working.  Still there seems > something a bit odd about the fix.  I had, in my home > directory, a .maxima directory with a file named > maxima-init.mac that sets certain maxima preferences. > Once I deleted this file,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-17 Thread mark mcclure
I finally got Sage.app working. Still there seems something a bit odd about the fix. I had, in my home directory, a .maxima directory with a file named maxima-init.mac that sets certain maxima preferences. Once I deleted this file, everything worked fine. As I understand it though, the sage dir

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-16 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 15, 4:59 am, "Georg S. Weber" wrote: > a patch is up for review at #5254. Well, still no luck. It's clear that the script has had some effect, since the error messages no longer refer to mabshoff's machine, but Maxima still doesn't start. Error logs post-patch and pre-patch are below. I

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 15, 12:53 pm, kcrisman wrote: > I suspect if this is available people will take advantage of it.  Many > of us have perfectly serviceable computers which can't handle/can't > afford the upgrade.  I would just build from source as a dev wannabe, > but having this available for platform

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 15, 11:33 am, "Georg S. Weber" wrote: > Hi, Hi Georg, > maybe off-topic, I deem it on-topic here: > > Probably I will use OS X 10.4.11 for quite some more time, and I build > Sage rather often for testing, and/or for my own personal use. Would > it help if I provided, say, the OS X 10.

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 15, 11:26 am, "Georg S. Weber" wrote: > Hi Mark, > hi Michael, > But e.g. for Mac OS X app bundles, it should be safe to call the "sage- > location" script each and every time at the startup of Sage --- the > additional time needed is negligible in the "good" case, and extremely > wel

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread kcrisman
> > Probably I will use OS X 10.4.11 for quite some more time, and I build > Sage rather often for testing, and/or for my own personal use. Would > it help if I provided, say, the OS X 10.4 .dmg files (Intel Core2Duo > regularly and sometimes even PPC G4)? My time and my Internet upload > connect

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread Georg S. Weber
Hi, maybe off-topic, I deem it on-topic here: Probably I will use OS X 10.4.11 for quite some more time, and I build Sage rather often for testing, and/or for my own personal use. Would it help if I provided, say, the OS X 10.4 .dmg files (Intel Core2Duo regularly and sometimes even PPC G4)? My

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread Georg S. Weber
Hi Mark, hi Michael, actually I am using Mac OS X 10.4.11 on the Intel Core2Duo MacBook where I tested it. I should have noted that I did download the source distribution .tar and did build on this box my own "10.4" .dmg with which I tested the new version of the script. (Aha -- I did rename the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 15, 6:46 am, mark mcclure wrote: > On Feb 15, 4:59 am, "Georg S. Weber" > wrote: Hi Mark, > > a patch is up for review at #5254. > > George, > > I applied your patch without success on my laptop at home. > However, the problem could very well be that I've got OS > 10.4.11 at home whil

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 15, 4:59 am, "Georg S. Weber" wrote: > a patch is up for review at #5254. George, I applied your patch without success on my laptop at home. However, the problem could very well be that I've got OS 10.4.11 at home while Michael built Sage.app for 10.5. I can try it on 10.5 tomorrow at w

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 13 Feb., 11:34, mabshoff wrote: > Ok, I figured it out. After downloading the dmg I dragged it to my > desktop and double clicked on it to start. It came up, but Maxima/ > clisp did not start. > > So, after quitting I run that sage on the command line and low and > behold the rebase script r

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-15 Thread Georg S. Weber
On 13 Feb., 11:34, mabshoff wrote: > Ok, I figured it out. After downloading the dmg I dragged it to my > desktop and double clicked on it to start. It came up, but Maxima/ > clisp did not start. > > So, after quitting I run that sage on the command line and low and > behold the rebase script r

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 13, 1:14 pm, mabshoff wrote: > Hmm, any chance you have gnuplot installed on your system? There > is an issue when gnuplot is provided by Fink or MacPorts ... Well, yes, I sure do. In fact, I installed MacPorts recently. Unfortunately, I set my $PATH to the minimum and the problem persis

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM, mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Feb 13, 10:02 am, mark mcclure wrote: >> On Feb 13, 12:55 pm, William Stein wrote: > > Hi Mark, > >> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, mark mcclure wrote: >> > What happens when you type: >> >> > ./sage -maxima >> >> I get the error

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 13, 10:02 am, mark mcclure wrote: > On Feb 13, 12:55 pm, William Stein wrote: Hi Mark, > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, mark mcclure wrote: > > What happens when you type: > > > ./sage -maxima > > I get the error message shown below.  I had tried that > already, since I frequentl

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 13, 12:55 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, mark mcclure wrote: > What happens when you type: > > ./sage -maxima I get the error message shown below. I had tried that already, since I frequently use sage precisely to access maxima. Bad sage -m

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 13, 9:55 am, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, mark mcclure wrote: Hi, > > On Feb 13, 5:34 am, mabshoff wrote: > >> Ok, I figured it out. After downloading the dmg I dragged it to my > >> desktop and double clicked on it to start. It came up, but Maxima/ > >> cl

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, mark mcclure wrote: > > On Feb 13, 5:34 am, mabshoff wrote: >> Ok, I figured it out. After downloading the dmg I dragged it to my >> desktop and double clicked on it to start. It came up, but Maxima/ >> clisp did not start. >> >> So, after quitting I run that sag

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 13, 5:34 am, mabshoff wrote: > Ok, I figured it out. After downloading the dmg I dragged it to my > desktop and double clicked on it to start. It came up, but Maxima/ > clisp did not start. > > So, after quitting I run that sage on the command line and low and > behold the rebase script ra

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-13 Thread mabshoff
Ok, I figured it out. After downloading the dmg I dragged it to my desktop and double clicked on it to start. It came up, but Maxima/ clisp did not start. So, after quitting I run that sage on the command line and low and behold the rebase script ran: Sprocketer:sage michaelabshoff$ ./sage -

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-12 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 12, 6:34 pm, Nick Alexander wrote: > On 12-Feb-09, at 5:08 PM, mabshoff wrote: > >> Didn't quite work for me.  When trying diff(x^2,x), I get: > > I copied the internal sage folder to my home directory, renamed,   > modified SAGE_ROOT, and this works for me. Ok, that gives me a good

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-12 Thread Nick Alexander
On 12-Feb-09, at 5:08 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > > > On Feb 12, 4:55 pm, mark mcclure wrote: >> On Feb 12, 11:44 am, mabshoff wrote: >> >>> Hi, > > Hi, > >>> since someone asked in IRC I build a 3.3.rc0 on a MacIntel running >>> OSX >>> 10.5. It can be found at >>> http://sage.math.washington.e

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-12 Thread mabshoff
On Feb 12, 4:55 pm, mark mcclure wrote: > On Feb 12, 11:44 am, mabshoff wrote: > > > Hi, Hi, > > since someone asked in IRC I build a 3.3.rc0 on a MacIntel running OSX > > 10.5. It can be found at > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.3/sage... > > [311 MB] > > Di

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.3.rc0 binary for MacIntel OSX 10.5

2009-02-12 Thread mark mcclure
On Feb 12, 11:44 am, mabshoff wrote: > Hi, > > since someone asked in IRC I build a 3.3.rc0 on a MacIntel running OSX > 10.5. It can be found at > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.3/sage... > [311 MB] Didn't quite work for me. When trying diff(x^2,x), I get: --