On May 6, 11:26 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:01 AM, gemili wrote:
> Your testing thus suggests that fxsr is really important, and we
> should be explicitly checking for it and not allowing Sage to run if
> the user doesn't have it. Also, we should look to see what pa
On May 22, 7:30 am, Adam wrote:
Hi Adam,
> Thanks Michael. I've tried doing as you said, but still no luck.
>
> export SAGE_MATPLOTLIB_GUI=yes
> ./sage -f python-2.5.2.p9 matplotlib-0.98.5.3rc0-svn6910.p3
>
> but I get the same error. Any idea what else I should try?
See http://trac.sagema
On May 20, 7:48 pm, Adam wrote:
> The problem is that I can't import pylab because _tkinter isn't
> recognized:
> sage: import pylab
>
> ImportError: No module named _tkinter
>
> Adam
We disable the tk backend in MPL on all platforms. To work around this
set
SAGE_MATPLOTLIB_GUI
to somethi
On May 20, 7:31 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Kjetil,
> > --- What can I do?
>
> Can you try installing Sage 3.4.2 from source and then run the notebook again?
This has very likely nothing to do with the build from source, etc,
but most likely is due to local proxy settings or a firewall
int
p://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/sage...
>
> > 4.0.rc0 should happen tonight and the final 4.0 ought to be out before
> > the week is over. 4.0.a0 has some small issue that 4.0.rc0 will fix,
> > but I would run 4.0.a0 before running 3.4.2 anyway ;)
&
e 4.0.alpha0 available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/sage-4.0.alpha0.tar
4.0.rc0 should happen tonight and the final 4.0 ought to be out before
the week is over. 4.0.a0 has some small issue that 4.0.rc0 will fix,
but I would run 4.0.a0 before running 3.4.2 anyway ;)
> Any
On May 18, 4:16 am, Kylin wrote:
Hi,
> When try to run the downloaded binary "sage-3.4.2-linux-
> CentOS_release_5.2_Final-sse2-i686-Linux" by typing:
>
> ./sage
>
> in the unzipped folder, I got such an error "absulotepath2myhome/progs/
> tools/sage342/local/bin/sage-sage: line 198: 28179 Il
On May 17, 1:24 pm, paul wrote:
> Ok, for those of you who saw my recent message about the illegal
> instruction ... I think I now know why that doesn't work. I think it
> is that the latest sse2-3.4.2 virtual machine does not support my
> processor (AMD Athlon 64 3000). I don't know why, since
Hello folks,
most 3.4.2 binaries are up on sagemath.org and being mirrored out.
>From the usual suspects some are still missing, i.e.
* Fedora Core 10 32 bit
* Atom
* RHEL 5.2/SLES 10 Itanium
* OSX 10.4 Intel
Most of the missing binaries will show up in the next 24 hours. We
also have some
On May 14, 3:57 am, Laurent wrote:
> Hello
Hi Laurent,
>
>
> x,y=var('x,y')
> s = x*y2 + x*(-y2 - x2 + 1) + x3 - x
> print simplify(s)
>
> Answer :
>
> 2 2 2 3
> x y + x (- y - x + 1) + x
On May 13, 4:12 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
> Dear Laurent,
>
> please do not use an existing thread for asking a completely different
> question. Better open a new thread.
Yep. Also do not open a thread by replying to an email from sage-devel
by changing the subject since the Groups figu
On May 12, 3:05 pm, kilucas wrote:
> On May 12, 8:39 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> Conversely, I've also since spotted reference to MoinMoin within Sage.
> I've not yet explored what benefits this might confer but, once I
> know, I might then be interested to know if I could easily replace
> M
On May 10, 7:24 am, pepe wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi,
> I am trying to install sagemath-3.0.5dfsg (i386) from repository. I am
> running Kubuntu 9.04.
> I am getting "dependency resolution failed" and it directs me to
> remove "libgd2-noxpm" module. KPackageKit is not progressing in
> installation
On May 8, 4:00 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM, IanSR wrote:
>
> > How do I copy users from one sage Notebook to another Sage Notebook?
>
> Sage-4.0 will support download/upload all worksheets to a zip file
> functionality.
That patch was merged in Sage 3.4.2, but i
On May 7, 4:24 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, mabshoff
>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for dong this work so far.
>
> > Did you ever figure out if libintl was now mandatory?
>
> Wasn't it libiconv?
Yep, just checked and you are right. But
On May 6, 7:15 am, gerhard wrote:
> FYI:
Hi Gerhard,
> I upgraded R to 2.9.0 on a Fedora 10 system:
> Installation of the matrix package failed (incompatible library
> issues)
>
> I recompiled all of sage to
On May 7, 6:05 am, gyro wrote:
> Hi,
> I am running Sage version 3.4.1 on a CentosOS5 Linux workstation. Sage
> is compiled from source.
> I am using the notebook interface through Firefox version 3.0.10 with
> jsMath v3.6a.
>
> In the notebook interface, when I evaluate the contents of a cell,
On May 7, 2:07 am, Johan Oudinet wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, mabshoff
> You're wright Michael! The administrator installed udev package and
> now Sage works!
Excellent, this was definitely a difficult journey.
> Thanks for your help. I'll never find thi
On May 4, 4:25 pm, gsw wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Georg,
> after several attempts I was able to produce a Sage-3.4.1dmg the
> contents of which are "drag-and-droppable", and the issue should not
> arise again (knock on wood) for future versions of Sage.
Well, since it always worked for me AFAIK
On May 4, 12:49 pm, Alessandro Torre
wrote:
> Hi.Here is the requested output
> (http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/df50...
> )
>
> Good Work.
> Alessandro
Hi Alessandro,
in the subsequent email you disassembled the whole file. What I wanted
was the output from
On May 4, 11:01 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 4, 2009, at 10:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Good point, I hadn't though about that. We could introduce a size()
> or cardinality() method that returns an Integer, or possibly infinity.
Combinat already uses cardinality() since they need
On May 4, 10:11 am, Iwan Lappo-Danilewski
wrote:
> Is there a chance that there will be executables that run on my work
> machine with the next release?
No, 3.4.2 won't have the fix, but 4.0 will in roughly two weeks.
> Or should I start compiling right now
> and maybe move to some SVN kind o
On May 4, 2:51 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 4 Kvě, 11:29, mabshoff
> wrote:
Hi,
>
>
> > I would suggest you complain in the Maxima group to have them take a
> > stake into packaging current Maxima releases for Debian/Ubuntu. AFAIK
> > the Ma
On May 4, 2:16 am, chand sarat wrote:
> Dear All,
Hi,
> It is a fact that for a number of scientific packages, Ubuntu does offer
> fairly outdated packages:
> 1. Current Sage package: 3.4.1 and the version offered by Ubuntu 9.04 is
> Sage 3.0.5.
Help is on the way: Debian experimental should
On May 4, 12:40 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I received the following question from my blog post at
>
> http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/03/22/clickable-mac-os-x-app-for-sage...
>
> I thought it's more appropriate as a sage-support question.
>
> > I have built the dmg package as descri
On May 3, 10:31 pm, saratchand wrote:
> Dear Sage Community,
Hi,
> You are aware that Sage has been included in Ubuntu 9.04. I have
> created a
> Ubuntu community documentation page for Sage
> at:https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SAGE
> It was a rush job at best, by someone whose interest in
On May 3, 1:54 am, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:33 PM, mabshoff
>
> wrote:
>
> > FYI: Simon's patch doesn't make any difference for the amount of
> > memory used for
>
> > sage: while p<2^20:
> > :
On May 3, 2:00 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 3 Mai, 10:04, mabshoff
> wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason you opened a new ticket and did not use #5949 as
> > mentioned above?
>
> Yes. I did the patch before breakfast :)
:)
Overall it s
FYI: Simon's patch doesn't make any difference for the amount of
memory used for
sage: while p<2^20:
: p=next_prime(p)
: g=FindGroupOrder(p,11)
:
In both cases about 2046MB more were used after the loop :(. Simon:
Run
init_mem=get_memory_usage()
before you do anything,
On May 3, 12:54 am, Alessandro Torre
wrote:
> On 2 Mag, 23:29, mabshoff
> "So far no one has provided information to what is wrong, i.e. which
> instruction[s] in what library causes this, so I cannot even start to
> fix this."
>
> Can I help somehow?
Absolute
On May 3, 1:20 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 3, 2009, at 1:04 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > As is this patch breaks badly:
>
> Yep, see
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3706
>
> - Robert
Do you mean we need an analog fix? I have always been mis
On May 3, 1:01 am, curious wrote:
Hi David,
> Mea culpa maxima. The folder /sage/spkg in the .dmg (and its contents)
> are uncopyable.
> Keepers of the oracle, is something going to be done about this? The
> problem is not
> present with the intel version.
Interesting, thanks for tracking th
On May 3, 12:28 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi,
Is there any reason you opened a new ticket and did not use #5949 as
mentioned above?
> PS:
>
> > One can then do
> > sage: for p in primes(2,100):
> > : R. = GF(p)[]
> > sage: get_memory_usage()
> > 778.35546875
>
> An
On May 2, 10:40 am, John Cremona wrote:
> On May 2, 5:55 pm, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
>
> > Dear John,
>
> > On 2 Mai, 18:39, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > > When an elliptic curve is created the code in the __init__ function in
> > > ell_generic.py (lines 164-5) do cause a multivariate polyn
On May 2, 3:27 pm, Rolandb wrote:
> Release 4.0 is soon. So I suggest we split the work.
>
> 1) Update R to the latest 2.9 release (ticket #3086)
> I have no development experiences, but I assume that updating is a
> straightforward activity (but maybe I'm wrong).
I doubt it will be straightfo
On May 2, 2:04 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Alessandro Torre
> > Is it possible that my processor is obsolete for this version of Sage?
>
> Yes.
>
> What is the output of
>
> cat /proc/cpuinfo
I doubt this will be helpful. Having thought about this for a whi
On May 2, 1:29 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Johan Oudinet wrote:
> > $ mount
> > /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
> > tmpfs on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755)
> > proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
> > sysfs on /sys ty
On May 1, 5:42 pm, nickname wrote:
> As said in my email, it is not possible to move the sage folder out
> of the .dmg container.
Yes, I read that already. How does that manifest itself? Do you get an
error message? Is the folder not selectable? etc.
> Also, the only to move this non-workin
ion, but I don't know where or if it is in
the manual.
> I want to use the sage.all module using python
>
> Thanks
This works:
mabsh...@sage:/scratch/mabshoff/sage-3.4.2.rc0$ ./sage -sh
Starting subshell with Sage environment variables set.
Be sure to exit when you are done and do n
On May 1, 5:48 am, Johan Oudinet wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:24 AM, mabshoff
Hi Johan,
> > Can you give a little more detail? By sheer accident it was just
>
> Well, this is exactly what I've done:
> 0) ssh to the server as a normal user.
> 1) do
On May 1, 12:06 pm, nickname wrote:
Hi,
> I wonder if the new binary of sage-3.4.1 OSX10.4 for MAC G4 is
> correct. or if I am doing something wrong.
I have not verified it to work, but I assume it has been well tested
by the packager. His builds have worked in the past.
> The sage folder
On May 1, 12:12 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> > No that I have a clue how to debug this, so I will poke RobertWB - I
> > am sure he has nothing better to do that to dive into this problem and
> > will be happy to debug this ;)
>
> Yep, I bet coercion is leaking rings. I'll look at this during
On May 1, 2:02 am, John Cremona wrote:
Hi John,
> The actual cardinality is computed using the pari library (since the
> field is a prime field and p<10**18). I the leak is in libsingular it
> must come from constructing the curve, not from computing the
> cardinality. So it would be worth
On Apr 30, 4:38 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Jurgis Pralgauskis
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > just trying to follow examples ofhttp://www.sagemath.org/library/crypto.pdf
> > Exercise 8.5 solution: page nr 124 (or 127 for file) has suspicious
> > code
>
> >
On Apr 30, 4:58 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Apr 30, 2009, at 12:08 , Michael Welsh wrote:
>
>
>
> > You've got an Intel computer, not a PPC. You should be downloading
> > this DMG instead:
>
> >http://www.sagemath.org/bin/apple_osx/intel/sage-3.4.1-OSX10.5-Intel-...
>
> Shouldn't Rosetta
On Apr 28, 6:24 am, Johan Oudinet wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Johan,
> I saw in trac that the ticket about my problem to start Sage in a
> Debian Lenny 64bit is closed since GAP was downgraded.
We closed it since the problem was seemingly related to the new GAP.
> I thought Sage-3.4.1 should now works
On Apr 30, 2:05 pm, "Dr. R" wrote:
> Thanks, I didn't see the Intel vs PowerPC links when I first did the
> download.
Well, I guess we should add a check to the startup script analog to
what we have for SSE instructions on Linux. This is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5950
C
On Apr 30, 9:15 am, opti wrote:
> Michael,
Hi Iram,
> Thanks for your reply.
> I did the exact same thing under magma, and it consumes 14 meg.
Hehe, you know how to get us going :)
> Have you found anything new?
I did find the cause, but I have not found a fix yet. What seems to
happens is
On Apr 30, 10:53 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Iwan Lappo-Danilewski
>
> wrote:
>
> > Have to report a similar problem on ubuntu 9.04..
> > While version 3.2.3 is running as fine as the "sagemath" ubuntu
> > package (3.0.5) the newest version won't start telling
On Apr 29, 11:11 am, opti wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I am using sage 3.4
> I have written a simple sage script to evalute the cardinal of Brent-
> Suyama elliptic curves s=11
> for primes < 2^27.
>
> Memory usage increases till program (or machine) crashes.
>
> The script is the following:
>
> p=3
On Apr 29, 4:46 am, David Joyner wrote:
> Hi:
>
> sage -help says:
>
> ...
> -optional -- list all optional packages that can be downloaded
> ...
>
> But then I get this
>
> w...@hera:~/texfiles/quotes$ sage -optional
> Using SAGE
> Serverhttp://www.sagemath.org//packageshttp://www.sagem
On Apr 27, 12:31 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 11:46 , rvaug...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have successfully installed the latest sage on a Fedora Core 9
> > machine
> > (name of machine: strings358). It seems to work fine.
>
> > One of my users wishes to access this re
On Apr 26, 9:10 pm, Alex Raichev wrote:
> Hi all:
Hi Alex,
> It looks like there's a tiny bug in subs_expr(): it hangs when given
> the empty dictionary.
>
> Alex
>
> --
> | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11
On Apr 26, 11:05 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Apr 26, 1:36 am, mabshoff
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > I do not see how that rules out clisp 2.47 - or am I just not getting
> > what you are driving at :)
>
> I meant if I can recreate the problem from 3.4 source as
On Apr 25, 10:42 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Apr 25, 7:02 pm, mabshoff
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > > What should I do until Sage 4.0? Is there a way to tweak my 3.4.1 to
> > > use clisp 2.47?
>
> > Do you mean clisp 2.46 since 3.4.1 ships with clisp 2.4
On Apr 25, 6:38 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Apr 25, 5:36 pm, mabshoff dortmund.de> wrote:
> > Not really, we switched from clisp 2.46 to 2.47 and if you look at
>
> > https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/753a8d2f3c052183
>
> > for some people who ha
On Apr 25, 2:17 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
Hi Chris,
> On Apr 25, 2:10 am, mabshoff
> Hmm. That is weird. I just compiled 3.4.1 from source and got the
> same error on the newer version too.
Ok.
> That seems to be the only delta between you guys and me so chances are
On Apr 25, 12:23 am, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
> Michael,
Hi Paul,
> > And Sage 3.4:
>
> > | Sage Version 3.4, Release Date: 2009-03-11 |
> > | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
> >
On Apr 24, 2:55 pm, mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
> Sage 3.4.1 which binaries I should post in the next couple hours has
> been build to use only SSE2, so that one should work for you.
Who would have thought, but it took longer than planned. Anyway, 32 as
well as 64 bit SSE2 only Centos binari
On Apr 24, 7:03 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
Hi,
> Notice first and second are very similar except for the cos() and exp
> ().
>
> Why first one ok but second bombs?
>
> sage: numerical_integral(sin(pi*cos(x/2)),0,2)[0]
> 0.85397903781471396
I guess you are using Sage 3.4?
Works for me in my
On Apr 24, 2:33 pm, Mikie wrote:
> Sage is trying to modify the file sage-flags.txt.
It should open it read only, but let me check.
> On Apr 24, 3:29 pm, Mikie wrote:
>
> > Version 3.4 for CentOS rel 5_2. Before I get the error below it says
> > "Warning; Sage was built on a machine that d
On Apr 24, 10:49 am, Mikie wrote:
Hi,
> Just installed Sage on CentOS 5.3 server. Local system. I am getting
> "sage-sage: line 197 6520 Illegal instruction sage-ipyth "$@" -i".
> Any help would be appreciated.
What Sage release precisely are you using, i.e. version, binary name,
etc? If i
On Apr 23, 5:41 pm, littlemathteacher wrote:
> Dear Michael,
Hi Markus,
> thanks.
>
> When I returned home this evening the process and the whole system
> seemed to be frozen as if by memory overload. I slowly tried to close
> some applications and among them accidentally was the bash in whic
On Apr 23, 4:28 pm, littlemathteacher wrote:
> Greetings from Franconia.
Hi,
> I tried to use the compiler to build Sage in my Zenwalk system
> (Zenwalk is based on Slackware Linux), but this time it did't work
> (might be due to the antique hardware I am using this time).
Could you elaborat
On Apr 22, 10:31 am, SG wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am a beginner trying to use Sage. I am running Sage 3.2.3 on a Win
> XP machine. I use the notebook instead of the command prompt. I found
> that if I run some of the demo programs like "a 3d plot", it crashed
> my IE window and I get a log file, b
o edit the tree and use
sage-native-execute
wherever we launch *anything* since the above problem is probably
lurking in a couple places.
> -M. Hampton
>
> On Apr 22, 2:53 am, mabshoff
> > #!/bin/sh
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=SAGE_ORIG_LD_LIBRARY_PATH; export LD_LIBRARY_PAT
On Apr 22, 12:46 am, Ajay Rawat wrote:
> Well i tried the command
> sage:octave_version()
> sage:3.0.0
> but when i tried octave_console
> it replied...
>
> octave:
> /usr/local/sage-3.2.3-Ubuntu8.04LTS-64bit-Intel-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/l\
> ibz.so.1: no version information ava
On Apr 21, 11:27 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Jason,
>
> Have a look at:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5371
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5459
>
> There are few other tickets about that are relevant, as well.
3.4.1 should have most of those (except the default change
On Apr 21, 9:45 pm, William Stein wrote:
> 2009/4/21 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> > On Apr 21, 3:55 pm, "Greg Grunberg" wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
>
> >> Attached as a .JPG file is the requested screenshot.
>
> >> Greg Grunberg
>
> &
On Apr 21, 3:55 pm, "Greg Grunberg" wrote:
Hi Greg,
> Attached as a .JPG file is the requested screenshot.
>
> Greg Grunberg
The screenshot reveals that your CPU is not advanced enough to run
this binary build of Sage, i.e. it is missing SSE3 instructions. You
can force it to run anyway (see t
On Apr 21, 4:49 pm, meanerelk wrote:
> Sure, here is the full output:http://www.sendspace.com/file/iulbgo
>
> Starting the notebook with various other arguments causes problems in
> other ways, too. For instance, if I start it with "notebook
> (address='', secure=True)" I get a modal dialog say
On Apr 21, 1:07 am, Nasser Abbasi wrote:
Hi,
> Simple question I hope. I see a number of interesting sage interaction
> code here:http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact
>
> Right now, to run any, I copy the code to my open notebook in the
> browser (I am on windows, so I am using VMWare and access
Hello folks,
now that 3.4.1 is more or less done the plan for 3.4.2 is emerging.
The main goal here is to get out a release quickly and mop up loads of
patches in trac which have been reviewed or are awaiting review. I
have moved every open patch from 3.4.2 to 4.0 to keep the 3.4.2
milestone clea
On Apr 20, 11:18 pm, meanerelk wrote:
Hi,
> Thanks for your help!
No problem.
> I can confirm that making 3.4.1.-rc4 worked just fine. Getting rid of
> clisp for 4 sounds good.
You don't even know how happy I will be once it is gone :)
> However, there is another niggling problem: I get a
On Apr 20, 3:56 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Apr 20, 3:46 pm, meanerelk wrote:
Hi
> > However, it has been out for months, so I am surprised no one else
> > seems to have had this problem.
>
> Well, clisp is quite buggy to say the least. We tell clisp at
> configure t
On Apr 20, 3:53 pm, bsdz wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Blair,
> Is anyone aware of an alternative to maxima's part function.
>
> http://maxima.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/en/maxima_6.html#IDX182
>
> It allows one to access any part of an algebraic expression using
> various indexes. A list of indexes uniqu
On Apr 20, 3:46 pm, meanerelk wrote:
Hi,
> Here is clisp's build.log and error.log:
>
> http://www.sendspace.com/file/fct6vuhttp://www.sendspace.com/file/gnroy3
>
> The only error is:
>
> "sspvw_sigsegv.d:94: error: too few arguments to function
> ‘sigsegv_leave_handler’"
>
> I have libsigseg
On Apr 20, 12:00 am, Kwankyu wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Kwankyu,
> After I modify some codes in a Sage library file, I can rebuild by the
> command "!sage -b" right in the running Sage. Then could I make the
> modified code be effective without exiting the running Sage? Or do I
> have to exit and rerun
Ooops, wrong group - if you want to follow up please do so in sage-
devel.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-support-unsubscr...@googlegroups
We are quite close to 3.4.1.rc4 and the remaining open tickets are at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&order=id&col=id&col=summary&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=component&col=reporter&milestone=sage-3.4.1
The situation in detail is curr
On Apr 18, 6:53 pm, William Stein wrote:
> 2009/4/18 Jorge E. ´Sanchez Sanchez :
> > So I went back, to install the previous version available in the download
> > page: sage-vmware-3.2.3, it worked for a while but very slowly all the time,
> > after that when I tried to run sage_vmx.vmx, the
On Apr 16, 10:33 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
Hi Chris,
> Which Sage tarball/package should I use for Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty
> beta) ??
>
> The Ubuntu 8.10 tarball doesn't work there. I get
>
> "9587 Illegal instruction"
Did you remove the sage-flags.txt after you got a warning? Then this
is a pr
On Apr 14, 4:44 pm, Alex Raichev wrote:
> Hi all:
Hi Alex,
> I want to sync my version of Sage 3.4 with the latest change sets. So
> in a notebook worksheet i typed
>
> hg_sage.pull()
>
> and got the error
>
> cd "/Applications/sage/devel/sage" && hg status
> cd "/Applications/sage/devel/sag
On Apr 13, 8:53 pm, Rado wrote:
Hi,
> Does that mean that also I cannot compile sage myself on a non-sse3
> machine (like my old amd64)? When I try I get "Illegal instructions"
> but not sure if its the cpu or something with the dependencies.
The problem is ATLAS build by Sage, it uses SSE3
On Apr 13, 4:40 pm, Rolando wrote:
Hi,
> Is it possible to make a contribution of code to Sage which has no
> license and no copyright?
No, it should be licensed in a GPL V2+ compatible way.
> The Sage Programming Guide seems to suggest that copyright should be
> given to yourself and Willi
On Apr 13, 10:13 am, Eric Kaufmann wrote:
> Binary did work before I copied it. A version of sage was already installed
> on the systems. When I copied it over the older version of sage was deleted
> first. This worked w/o any issues on the first test machine I did this on.
Well, what did you
On Apr 13, 10:06 am, Eric Kaufmann wrote:
> I didn't set the sage root variable.
Ok.
> I looked through the documentation. Didn't seem to find how to do this. So,
> how do you do you set the root variable?
>
> I haven't set up any other variables for Sage. As, far as the details I
> copied th
On Apr 13, 9:57 am, kaufma wrote:
Hi,
> I am updating sage on OSX 10.5 lab machines. I downloaded .dmg file
> then I copied the sage folder over to all of the workstations. I get
> the following message when I try to open Sage.
>
> You must compile sage first using the 'make' , in the sage ro
On Apr 12, 8:42 pm, pong wrote:
Hi,
> I wrote couple sage scripts and would like to compile them in Mac OS
> 10.5.
If you did write Sage code that is not Cython code you do not need any
compiler or am I misunderstanding you?
> Looks like I need GCC. How can I install one? A quick search on
On Apr 10, 5:21 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Incidentally, there *is* software which will do this and show step-by-
> step answers, including free software - I saw some demonstrated at the
> Joint Math Meetings, for instance seehttp://www.xyalgebra.org/index.html
> . This is for a completely differen
On Apr 8, 1:11 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:14 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> >> You probably don't have nearly enough RAM to support running several
> >> Sage processes. Perhaps your use of ulimit to limit resource
> >> consumption isn't setup very well. It's hard to give
On Apr 8, 1:50 am, mindbound wrote:
Hi,
> Hello, I have question which, although probably being trivial or
> irrelevant at all, still bothers me for some time. Namely, if I
> already have installed on my computer a significant part of Sage's
> constituent packages (ATLAS, BLAS, GAP, GSL, Scipy,
On Apr 7, 2:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Timothy Clemans
>
> > Are you trying to build from source or use a binary? You're on
> > Bluehost right trying to use Sage?
> > I don't think there's a binary for CentOS
>
> There are CentOS binaries:
>
> http://sagem
On Apr 4, 3:12 pm, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Apr 3, 10:14 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Actually, I just realized I could check this for myself, so I did... I
> don't see anything about the OOM killer, but there is a recurring,
> strange error message about "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s
On Mar 28, 1:48 pm, "Justin C. Walker" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't get to sage.math: ports 80 (http) and 22 (ssh) don't respond
> and attempts to connect time-out. 'ping' works, FWIW.
Must be a local problem, I can log in without problems. Things can be
a little slow via http, but that might b
On Mar 28, 4:52 am, Roger Mason wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Roger,
> I tried to post the above problem to sage-devel, as instructed by the
> failure report but my message was rejected.
You have to be subscribed.
> Here is the machine information:
> The last bit of the install log is attached.
Th
On Mar 26, 10:24 pm, Timothy Clemans
wrote:
> Instead of actually modifying Python to fix some annoyances Sage uses
> IPython to preparse the code. For example in Sage "4 ^ 6" is preparsed
> into "4 ** 6".
Yep.
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Greg Kuperberg
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi. I see tha
On Mar 19, 9:35 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Byungchul Cha wrote:
>
> > I must misunderstand something very trivial. I followed the steps
> > described at the release tour of Sage 3.3, except that I replaced 3.3
> > with 3.4, since I thought I was compiling sage-
On Mar 16, 5:53 am, Karthick wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Karthick,
> i am a newbie to sage. i tried to install sage in my Fedora Linux
> machine. I downloaded the binary files one for Fedora named sage-3.4-
> Fedora_release_9-i686-Linux.tar(1). As instructed i untar the file and
> rename the folder as "
On Mar 16, 11:18 am, william wrote:
Hi,
> Platform/OS: MAC OS X 10.5
> SAGE Version 3.0.2, Release Date: 2008-05-24
>
> Just after installing Sage, the startup time on my system increased
> significantly (it is now 2.5 minutes!).
Ok. Where did you install Sage? Does uninstalling Sage fix the
1 - 100 of 824 matches
Mail list logo
