Re: [sipx-users] Blank password and last update

Sorry, build 4.4.0. Nikolay Subbotkin Senior System Administrator Publishers "Prosveshchenye" tel: +7 495 789 30 40 ext. 4235 From: Kumaran [mailto:thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:52 AM To: Discussion list for users of

Re: [sipx-users] Blank password and last update

Hi Subbotkin, This behavior you seeing in 4.4 or 4.6 build? Regards, Kumaran T On 7/27/2012 12:03 PM, Subbotkin, Nikolay wrote: I have problem: I get last update SipXec two -- three days ago after update LDAP sync change rules. OK, I fixed this. But next time sync, script delete users ali

[sipx-users] Blank password and last update

I have problem: I get last update SipXec two - three days ago after update LDAP sync change rules. OK, I fixed this. But next time sync, script delete users alias (my alias is phone number and ID SAM-Account). Ok, I fix and this. Next I see iP phone not register in my SipXec. I open users setti

Re: [sipx-users] Karoo Bridge Core Library is now open source!

Nice to see you here Eric! Let's see where it leads. The most vital resource is time. loved the simplicity of OpenSBC web interface and I would love to see it back to life. Joegen On 07/27/2012 02:09 AM, Eric Hernaez wrote: > I am in favor of reviving OSBC :) > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12

Re: [sipx-users] Increase RTP port range

11000-12998 <- This value only allows you 500 channels. RTP proxy requires two ports for each leg. The main reason I could think of why it was changed is to make sure that media relay rtp port range does not conflict with freeswitch port range. On 07/27/2012 12:41 AM, Dave May wrote: Sor

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6.0

Ok, Thanks for the update on the Polycom, now I have something regarding updating DNS records/configuration. I had changed the "Domain Name" under system > domain. It updated /etc/named.conf with the new name including the name of the zone file (I went from domain.net, to sipx.domain.net), but di

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6.0

Let's keep an eye on it. It is harmless to run multiple times. Btw I have a fix for the import and polycom issue, just testing it.I'll respond later On Jul 26, 2012 5:17 PM, "Bryan Anderson" wrote: > I guess third time's the charm??? I setup a new vm and setup from the > same image. This time

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6.0

I guess third time's the charm??? I setup a new vm and setup from the same image. This time it only asked once. -Bryan Anderson On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: > >> Is the /usr/bin/sipxecs-setup supposed to run

Re: [sipx-users] Default password / pin policy

+1 I think the passwords should be random. I think there should be available settings for defaults: auto assign password email user their password or send me a password reset link to my email This way when creating multiple users the boxes will remain checked or unchecked as the need may be. Is

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6.0

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: > Is the /usr/bin/sipxecs-setup supposed to run the first *two* times you > log into the system? If sipxecs-setup is successful, it removes itself from /root/.bashrc which is called upon login. The code to remove itself is also in ~/.bashr

Re: [sipx-users] Feature request: Admission control

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/26/2012 09:47 AM, sipx-users-requ...@list.sipfoundry.org wrote: > These are all good points, but it doesn't help when you are not > using a gateway device with limited resources, or an ITSP who > blocks the nth call. What about when you have mult

Re: [sipx-users] Default password / pin policy

Great suggestion. You might consider putting the default password in the User Group too, we use groups in a kind of tenanted solution so it would be good if each customer (ie group) could have a seperate default password. On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:51 PM, George Niculae wrote: > I noticed lately

Re: [sipx-users] Default password / pin policy

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, George Niculae wrote: > I noticed lately that some changes were done in this area - AFAIU > passwords will be empty by default but when creating an user from admin > portal a button to generate random pass is available. While this address > some of the issues rai

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6.0

Is the /usr/bin/sipxecs-setup supposed to run the first *two* times you log into the system? -Bryan Anderson On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > Restore from 4.4 *should be* foolproof. you can restore from (almost) any > previous version, any domain, any ip address, any

Re: [sipx-users] Karoo Bridge Core Library is now open source!

Actualy we are using Karoo to connect all our remote user. We have architecture Sipx/Karoo, our platform is distributed in 4 countries (Argentina, USA, Uruguay y Colombia) and 3000 users. Thanks to Sipx and Karoo Team. Martin Rodriguez VoIP & Video Engineer AR: +54-11-4109-1700 ext 8249 US: +1 8

Re: [sipx-users] Karoo Bridge Core Library is now open source!

I am in favor of reviving OSBC :) On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Joegen Baclor wrote: > OSS Software Solutions released the OSS Core library for Karoo Bridge > under the L-GPL license today. This library is the B2BUA engine for > Karoo Bridge and can give way for other projects such as sipX

Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010

The biggest selling point of sipxecs is that it uses Open Standards. Lync does not. Audiocodes and the Siperator both have a claim to do Lync integration as a mediating server between a PBX and Lync. Probably a great place to start. Of course with Karoo now being open source, it might be a goo

[sipx-users] Default password / pin policy

I noticed lately that some changes were done in this area - AFAIU passwords will be empty by default but when creating an user from admin portal a button to generate random pass is available. While this address some of the issues raised by Todd I don't feel like the right way to implement it. That

Re: [sipx-users] Increase RTP port range

Sorry, there were approximately 800 inbound calls connected to 200 agents when the max-sessions limit was reached. Increasing max-sessions to 1500 allowed the number of incoming calls to increase to 900, but that resulted in a slew of the RTP errors listed below as well as reports of one-way audio

Re: [sipx-users] Increase RTP port range

You left out the most vital piece of information. How many calls do you have physically active in space time? Is it about a 1000? On 07/27/2012 12:19 AM, Dave May wrote: We ran out of available sessions on our sipXecs OpenACD server this morning, so we increased the max-sessions from 1000

[sipx-users] Increase RTP port range

We ran out of available sessions on our sipXecs OpenACD server this morning, so we increased the max-sessions from 1000 to 1500. Predictably (at least in hindsight, that is), we then ran out of RTP ports as the total number of channels in use went over 1000. 2012-07-26 08:25:02.389178 [CRIT] so

Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010

lync is lock in. their handsets totally their platforms running the backend. they only have certified gateways because they play so much less well than others. We used to have a saying here, noone ever got fired for buying microsoft. normally they just get their head axed for making really expensiv

Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010

You can integrate Lync via gateways with PBX's etc. They do have a certification program. It would be good if SipX could have this, and that is what I'm going to attempt via our Audiocodes Mediant 1000. I did have this working (without presence) a few years ago when I last played with it. I als

Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010

It is very clear to how microsoft markets Lync their aim is the same, for the enterprise and as the pbx via their other products. You can already qwasi integrate with other IM services via federation (meaning I can send an IM to my "alternate" IM account at my domain which is hosted elsewhere. I c

Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010

Couldn't agree more Tony. The cloud is the future, and SipX needs to support these services to keep relevant. Unified Communicaitons really means all your communications software/hardware working together. However it has only been that way if you use all MS\Cisco\etc pieces. If SipX were to bri

Re: [sipx-users] Feature request: Admission control

Cisco had done some work on this but I'm not sure it's current state in their routers ( http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/solutions_docs/voip_solutions/CAC .html#wp941119). There's also a RFC that's being worked on around this. http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc5865 Some day... some day... Todd

Re: [sipx-users] Feature request: Admission control

Ah, but that is why we have Mike. Those complicated systems need a top notch Engineer, Author and just all around fast driver to show them how to correctly engineer the goezinda' and goezoutta' of the network. What's that line - we don't need no stinkin' CAC, we got Mike to watch our BACK. I ag

Re: [sipx-users] 4.6.0 install - homer dependencies

Yeah. There are still some issues related to SQL not saving the correct port information. On 07/26/2012 02:07 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: I now see packets getting captured, just can't search. :) -Bryan Anderson On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Douglas Hubler > wrot

Re: [sipx-users] Feature request: Admission control

These are all good points, but it doesn't help when you are not using a gateway device with limited resources, or an ITSP who blocks the nth call. What about when you have multi site setup where you have handsets in the field? What about where you have a multi-site sipXecs deployment with a sipXe