Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread Bryan Anderson
@R P - It doesn't matter which phone we unplug to reduce to 7 phones, or which phone we delay the ringing. It still works with 7 or less phone, not with 8. @Michael - we have two numbers A and B. A goes to a hunt group with the 8 extensions assigned to line one of the phones, the extension

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread Tony Graziano
: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Sat Nov 20 13:50:31 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers @R P - It doesn't matter which phone we unplug to reduce

[sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread R P Herrold
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Bryan Anderson wrote: @R P - It doesn't matter which phone we unplug to reduce to 7 phones, or which phone we delay the ringing. It still works with 7 or less phone, not with 8. those pesky facts get in the way of a prefectly good theory every time ;) I suppose the

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread Tony Graziano
/ - Original Message - From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Sat Nov 20 13:50:31 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers @R P - It doesn't matter which

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread Todd Hodgen
the circumstances. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 11:05 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Create unique

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread Tony Graziano
@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Sat Nov 20 14:40:54 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers I can point to at least one installation that has a hunt group with 9 Polycom's on it that are all in a hunt group with their line 3. Each phone also has their own two extension so it. It works beautifully

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-20 Thread Dave Deutschman
...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 11:43 AM To: thod...@frontier.com; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Polycom says never put the same line on more than

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-19 Thread Michael Picher
What does the inbound ringing look like? Are you trying to ring all 8 phones at once? If so, how are you doing it? Hunt group or a separate user on each phone or a phantom user with forwarding to ring at the same time on a bunch of phones? Mike On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:40 PM, R P Herrold

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread Bryan Anderson
feasible for that office. Thanks Bryan -- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:18 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Separately, you are on an older version of sipx. What does

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread Bryan Anderson
feasible for that office. Thanks Bryan -- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:18 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Separately, you are on an older version of sipx. What does

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread Todd Hodgen
...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Bryan Anderson Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:52 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers uhm I discovered that not all 8 phones were connected

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread Bryan Anderson
...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Bryan Anderson *Sent:* Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:52 PM *To:* Discussion list for users of sipXecs software *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers uhm I discovered that not all 8 phones were connected. After plugging in the 8t phone

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread Tony Graziano
:33:09 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers It does make a difference. Unplugging phone number 8 calls start working again. If we deley one or more phones to ring if no answer, the calls also work. Bryan On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Todd Hodgen thod...@frontier.com wrote

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread Bryan Anderson
...@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: thod...@frontier.com thod...@frontier.com; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Thu Nov 18 16:33:09 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers It does make a difference. Unplugging phone

[sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-11-18 Thread R P Herrold
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Bryan Anderson wrote: All phones get their IP's from the DHCP server distributed on the SipXecs ISO. It is not unheard of for a MAC address, which is used to try to ensure uniqueness of IP assigmment to be duplicated by a hardware vendor [I have some specialty hardware

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Picher
. . -- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:02:38 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
:02:38 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/ On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Bryan Anderson

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Bryan Anderson
...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/ On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.comwrote: ok

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
the Base URL to that? if so, still no packages. . -- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:02:38 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Bryan Anderson
: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/ On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.com

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Bryan Anderson
...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/ On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.com wrote

[sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Bryan Anderson
I work for a small non profit and we have begun using sipX in an office in Everett,WA. We have 8, 2 line polycom soundpoint 331 phone. We use NexVortex as our service provider with 4 DID's. Just after moving to this system we noticed some calls would ring once and then disconnect. We

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
/ - Original Message - From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Wed Oct 27 13:50:35 2010 Subject: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers I work for a small non profit and we have begun

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
Message - From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Wed Oct 27 13:50:35 2010 Subject: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers I work for a small non profit and we have begun

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Bryan Anderson
: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Separately, you are on an older version of sipx. What does: cat /etc/redhat-release output say? It is likely you need a repo change and two inline updates in order to get current. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
for that office. Thanks Bryan -- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:18 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Separately, you are on an older version of sipx. What does: cat

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Josh M. Patten
: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers 2 things need to happen. 1. Rename the repo that is there as CentOS-Base.repo edit it and remove the sipx information at the bottom, that's hurting you right now, and save it. 2. get the 'intermediate 4.2 repo using cd /etc/yum.repos.d wget http

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 10/27/10 1:50 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: I have seen the same problem, and ONLY when calling from verizon cell phones. (and I am still on 4.2.0, since I am not convinced the update will not break things...) I assume you set hunt group by having a phantom user fwd to the hunt group?

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
Moving from 4.2.0 to the proper 4.2.1 is a two-step procedure. Maybe I will write an interim wiki page on that since it comes up a lot. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: On 10/27/10 1:50 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: I have seen the same

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 10/27/10 6:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: Moving from 4.2.0 to the proper 4.2.1 is a two-step procedure. Maybe I will write an interim wiki page on that since it comes up a lot. I am thinking of building a new centos64, doing a backup and then restore. That way if it breaks, I can go back.

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Matthew Kitchin (Public)
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
There was one reported issue where both a 32 and 64 bit java got installed, two yum commands fixed it, ultimately, but it was also a 4.0.4 install but not using a sipx ISO. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: On 10/27/10 6:37 PM, Tony

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuserV4r2/Upgrading+from+4.0.4+or+4.2.0+to+the+proper+4.2.1 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: On 10/27/10 6:37 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: Moving from 4.2.0 to the proper 4.2.1 is a two-step procedure.

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Matthew Kitchin (Public)
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs softwaresipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Tony Graziano
27 19:26:09 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Is there a known issue going from 4.0.4 straight to 4.2.1? That is what I have done. The only issue I had is my ACD was destroyed. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net Sender: sipx-users-boun

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Matthew Kitchin (Public)
Thanks. I haven't had it occur in 10 upgrades, so I wanted to make sure it wasn't a lingering problem that could pop up later. --Original Message-- From: Tony Graziano To: mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers Sent

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Bryan Anderson
I just set the DID 425XXX on the hunt group and that is were the calls go. On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: On 10/27/10 1:50 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: I have seen the same problem, and ONLY when calling from verizon cell phones.

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Bryan Anderson
and running the SIP trunk over it. A T1 is not available nor feasible for that office. Thanks Bryan -- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:22:18 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Bryan Anderson
Should I change the Base URL to that? if so, still no packages. . Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:02:38 -0400 From: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-27 Thread Bryan Anderson
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers By golly you might be right. Try this one: http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.2.1/CentOS_5/i386/ On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.comwrote: ok, so this is what i did: 1 ) I renamed the repo under