Re: struts-config and xslt

2003-08-05 Thread Rob Leland
t certainly couldn't/shouldn't be the module name. -Rob Steve -----Original Message- From: Rob Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 4, 2003 6:26 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: struts-config and xslt Jonas Björnerstedt wrote: Hello, Having to evaluate an

Re: struts-config and xslt

2003-08-04 Thread Rob Leland
es. instead of: Descriptions should be available at all levels. Jonas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/configActionConfig.java

2003-08-04 Thread Rob Leland
looked these. Thanks ! -- - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life. -Confucius. - To

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/configActionConfig.java

2003-08-03 Thread Rob Leland
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life. -Confucius.

Re: Addition of two new actions

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Leland
vor of the simpler classes. - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life. -Confucius. --

Re: Addition of two new actions

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Leland
e, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life. -Confucius.

Re: Addition of two new actions

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: --- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: David Graham wrote: --- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ted Husted wrote: I use many utilities Actions like these, and the result is that fewer *custom* Actions are nee

Re: Addition of two new actions

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: --- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ted Husted wrote: I use many utilities Actions like these, and the result is that fewer *custom* Actions are needed. I think increasing the number of standard Actions in the distribution is a very good idea. It

Re: Addition of two new actions

2003-08-01 Thread Rob Leland
would have a package structure o.a.s.tools.(util, actions, ) -- - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life. -Confucius

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

2003-07-31 Thread Rob Leland
Steve: Be sure to fill out the doc/volunteers.xml when you have a chance. - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life. -Confucius

Re: Refactoring RequestUtils

2003-07-31 Thread Rob Leland
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Rob Leland (703-525-3580) Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day of your life.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/htmlJavascriptValidatorTag.java

2003-07-28 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: I think we should only place @since tags on methods in the public API (public and protected). agreed, 1+ -- Rob Leland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [validator - ValidWhen ] Bug or unneeded variable.

2003-07-28 Thread Rob Leland
an someone who has a *live* site using the code. ;-) Then how do we handle *maintaining* generated code ? a) manually fix any bugs. b) wait for antlr bug fixes then recreate the files. Rob James -Original Message----- From: Rob Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003

Re: [validator - ValidWhen ] Bug or unneeded variable.

2003-07-27 Thread Rob Leland
James Turner wrote: It's auto-generated code, so you can talk to the ANTLR folks if you want :-) Did you check in the files to CVS that were used to generate the .java files, or could you ? -Rob James -Original Message- From: Rob Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: S

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/test/test/org/apache/struts/taglib/htmlTestFrameTag1.jsp TestFrameTag3.jsp TestFrameTag5.jsp TestFrameTag7.jsp TestImgTag1a.jspTestImgTag3a.jsp TestImgTag5a.jsp TestImgTag7a.jsp TestLinkTag1.jsp TestLinkTag3.jspTestLinkTag4.jsp TestLinkTag5.jsp TestLinkTag6.jsp TestLinkTag7.jsp TestLinkTag8.jsp

2003-07-27 Thread Rob Leland
- "> + "> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ - "> + "> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ - "> + "> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ - "> + "> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ - ">

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.properties.sample

2003-07-26 Thread Rob Leland
e is talk of scrapping the ant build anyway... I just happen to be in a rare spirt mode. -- Rob Leland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[validator - ValidWhen ] Bug or unneeded variable.

2003-07-26 Thread Rob Leland
& _token==null && _ttype!=Token.SKIP ) { } so the if statement will never be executed. -- Rob Leland - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ActionServlet init parameters [WAS] Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actionActionServlet.java

2003-07-26 Thread Rob Leland
so the ModuleConfigImpl or some other class under impl class registered the DTD for the struts-config.xml it needs. -Rob David Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rob Leland

Re: [Vote] Don Brown as committer

2003-07-23 Thread Rob Leland
) are/is .. Don, I wasn't familar with your name but after searching Google, I see that you developed stxx, Struts & Cocoon adaptor, BFS scripting for struts, Action pattern matching, it also looks like you are familar with JetSpeed (Not sure) ... -- R

Re: Nightly build is generating empty binary distribution file

2003-07-21 Thread Rob Leland
uires 1.3 or before to compile :-(. In the top level build.properties file set jdk.version=1.4 and you'll be able to build. -Rob Thanks Steve Craig - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rob Leland

Re: Error with "release-notes-1.0.xml" in build

2003-07-19 Thread Rob Leland
rrent\target\document ation\userGuide\printer\installation-oas.html I am useing Xerces 1.4.4 and Xalan 2.5 -Rob I didn't find anything like this in the archives. Any idea what this might be? -- Rob Leland - To unsubscri

Re: DynaActionForm.getMap() change

2003-07-16 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: DynaActionForm.getMap() returns the Map that the properties are stored in without copying it to a new Map instance or wrapping it in an unmodifiable Map. IMO, we should treat that method with much more care and return an unmodifiable view of the Map considering it's mainly to

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actionActionServlet.java

2003-07-14 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: --- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wanted to pull this over to the 1_1_BRANCH but can't find what property file 'configWebXml' is defined in. Shouldn't it be in the LocalString.properties file or ActionResource.properties file ?

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actionActionServlet.java

2003-07-14 Thread Rob Leland
I wanted to pull this over to the 1_1_BRANCH but can't find what property file 'configWebXml' is defined in. Shouldn't it be in the LocalString.properties file or ActionResource.properties file ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dgraham 2003/07/02 21:44:13 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Steve Raeburn as a Struts Committer

2003-07-08 Thread Rob Leland
Steve Raeburn wrote: I'm getting the long delay just using Putty interactively. But as you've mentioned Eclipse seems to authenticate at least twice during a checkout. Also, I've never had problems using anonymous CVS so it does seem to be SSH related. I'll try Craig's suggestion and take a look a

Struts 1.1 branch

2003-07-02 Thread Rob Leland
Were we going to maintain a struts 1.1 branch, or just go forward like ant and other projects. I know we had talked about doing away with beta's/RC's and just releasing 1.1.x, 1.2.x Thoughts? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modular Struts Examples

2003-07-01 Thread Rob Leland
Ted Husted wrote: I'd like to propose that we gather together the struts-documentation, struts-example (MailReader), struts-exercise-taglib, struts-upload, struts-validator, and tiles-documentation I am curretly -0 on this. I don't like smashing --all-- the examples into one example simply becau

Re: Validwhen returns, need some pixie dust on the nightly buildmachine

2003-07-01 Thread Rob Leland
James Turner wrote: Ummm, ok... Where does it live? James -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Cooper Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Validwhen returns, need some pixie dust on the nightly build machine J

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release

2003-06-26 Thread Rob Leland
-- Vote: Struts 1.1 Final Release Plan [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release [ ] -1

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

2003-06-26 Thread Rob Leland
The Gump build is going to fail again, tomorrow morning, I have been babysitting the different gump machines. I'd appreciate it if someone that has the time could see what I am missing. I have been tweaking the struts build.xml and it looks like it should really work. The only funny thing is th

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

2003-06-24 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2003 01:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rleland 2003/06/23 22:45:13 Modified:.build.xml Log: Change version by adding '-post' to verify that gump is indeed using an old struts build.xml file not the current one. Revision ChangesPa

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

2003-06-23 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: On Monday 23 June 2003 11:43, Martin Cooper wrote: On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, James Mitchell wrote: On Monday 23 June 2003 11:18, Christopher Lenz wrote: I don't think the Gump builds have anything todo with the nightly builds of Struts. The Gump descriptors are in t

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

2003-06-23 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: On Monday 23 June 2003 11:43, Martin Cooper wrote: On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, James Mitchell wrote: On Monday 23 June 2003 11:18, Christopher Lenz wrote: I don't think the Gump builds have anything todo with the nightly builds of Struts. The Gump descriptors are in t

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

2003-06-18 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: On Wednesday 18 June 2003 23:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rleland 2003/06/18 20:30:46 Modified:.build.xml Log: Roll back changes so that inorder to build struts, a user must first go to the contrib.struts-legacy directory and do a seperate build. This

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

2003-06-18 Thread Rob Leland
I am sure this is occuring because the target is set to the base struts directory, and so there are no *.class files to generate a struts-legacy.jar though the .class files are probably still in the main struts.jar. I'll try creating two seperate projects under gump to see if this solves the pr

Re: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with FileUpload Beta2

2003-05-30 Thread Rob Leland
James Turner wrote: From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 I agree that deprecating methods does not require a new beta. We don't guarantee backwards compatibility between betas. James, can you act as release manager for RC2? Sounds like Martin won't have time to do it. David

Re: Where's RC1?

2003-02-21 Thread Rob Leland
After fixing the DTD reference in the struts-config.xml it appears that all tests passed, unlike the earlier email I sent you. Though I am not sure about the last test since it doesn't seem to report any failure count. [junit] Testcase: testMultiFactory took 2.003 sec [junit] Testcase

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Release Candidate 1 Release Plan

2003-02-15 Thread Rob Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: -- Vote: Struts 1.1-rc1 Release Plan [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the re

Re: IncludeTag

2003-02-15 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: Hmmm...no takers on this one eh? Here is a guess... It looks like to name an anchor point for items that are included when a hyperlink is generated, possably using JavaScript.. It was added May 09 2001 By Craig, In version 1.13 of the Tag. In that version the RequestUtils

Re: It's Valentine's Day, where are we?

2003-02-14 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: The ModuleConfig context attributes are all set up at startup time, under a key of Globals.APPLICATION_KEY plus the module prefix. The ModuleConfig for the currently executing module is stored as a request attribute (under Globals.APPLICATION_KEY). FYI the APPLICATI

Re: [Bugzilla #16603] Discussion Please

2003-02-08 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: However, at this point in time, I'm going to suggest that we resolve this one as LATER and put it into the "1.2 Family" camp. +1, We have a good product and have uncovered some inconsistent behaviour. The 1.2 relase time seems appropiate. -Rob -

Re: Cactus Test Failures?

2003-02-07 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Robert Leland wrote: Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 16:38:20 -0500 From: Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Cactus Test Failures? Robert Lela

Re: [VOTE] Declare Struts 1.1b3 as Struts 1.1 RC1

2003-01-18 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: +1 Didn't David add the cdata/comments to the Javascript Tag that he and Martin were talking about on Thursday. It seemed that there was still disagreement that was a good thing ? Would those end up in the RC1 from the head of the CVS tree or are we voting on the STRUTS_

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-24 Thread Rob Leland
On 23 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Vote: Struts 1.1b3 Release Plan > [X ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am > unable tohelp support it( On Vacation) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan

2002-12-21 Thread Rob Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: So, where are we on this exactly? I believe people are OK with this Saturday for the freeze / tag date. But if we're going for that, then I need to get a revised plan out soon, and I'd rather take everything into account at once than have a second version vetoed. If I change

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide installation.xml

2002-12-17 Thread Rob Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: I guess we could remove the commons-services.jar from the builds, +1 Do you have any thoughts on how best to salvage the code you're interested in? Need to give it some thought. I just discovered it when I was removing unused imports and cleaning up JavaDoc, for contr

[Short Term] Rob Leland

2002-12-17 Thread Rob Leland
FYI: I am finishing up the ModuleConfig renaming by putting in factory Methods in and changing over the tests to use the Factories and ModuleConfig interfaces. I to find time to get other more important items like bugs later this week. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide installation.xml

2002-12-17 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On 18 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Commons Services isn't yet released. AFAIK, we don't have any code in Struts 1.1 that uses this, and we've sort of replaced the original concept with plugins. Is anyone actually using it *because* it's included in t

Re: Avoid code reformating !

2002-12-16 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: 3. I disagree that we should stop formatting code. We have a standard that we should be following. If we need to change that standard then we can debate that. One thing the automatic code formatters do that isn't nice is to reorder methods. I believe this was one big g

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan

2002-12-12 Thread Rob Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: Just to let folks know, I would then suggest December 21 as the new Code Freeze / Tag Date. +1 I just realized that what I suggested went contrary to what Craig and other said that they wanted to do for new releases, go to an Ant style release numbering., which doesn't

Re: b3 minus 27? (or so)

2002-12-03 Thread Rob Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: Although I'm a committer on Validator, I'm kinda just the infrastructure guy, and don't feel qualified to vouch for the patch. -- Martin Cooper Ok, Thanks and I know the feeling. I need to learn JavaScript for some other work I doing and I am taking a little extra ti

Re: b3 minus 27? (or so)

2002-12-02 Thread Rob Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: Hmm, I'm just reading this on December 1st... ;-) I'm just about finished with a complete system rebuild on my PC, so I'm just about back in action. I'm not sure how much time I'll have this week, but I'll see what I can do. I'm doubtful on a b3 this week, but I agree with t

Re: Removing the Consultants Page

2002-11-26 Thread Rob Leland
+1, I get tired just watching you update it !!! David Graham wrote: I think Ted is in favor of dropping the Consultants page. I am as well and if you all agree then I think we should remove it. I'm personally tired of handling the requests for new links and policing the rules. -- To

Re: PlugIn, ApplicationConfig and Deprecated

2002-11-25 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Since we went to all the effort to change ApplicationConfig to ModuleConfig in the first place, we should complete the task and banish it from any non-deprecated APIs that we have. This whole change did make me pretty squeamish :-), but a half-completed change is

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc status.xml

2002-11-21 Thread Rob Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Website updated from CVS: 2002 NOV 17 by husted. +Website and Javadocs updated from CVS: 2002 NOV 21 by husted. Thanks !!! -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc status.xml

2002-11-18 Thread Rob Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Website updated from CVS: 2002 NOV 11 by husted. + Website updated from CVS: 2002 NOV 17 by husted. The Struts Websites JavaDocs aren't been updated. I recreated the UML diagrams back in October, however the dates on the UML are from June. -Rob -- To unsubscribe

Re: javadoc & Weird state of org/apache/struts/util/AppException.java

2002-11-08 Thread Rob Leland
;vi". I noticed David G. made some formatting changes in this file a couple of weeks ago. Apparently every other line was a blank line, for some reason? The blank lines appeared when Rob Leland made some minor changes about 7 weeks ago. In my copy, if I just replace the "^M"s (what sho

Re: Action.java & Globals.java questions.

2002-11-06 Thread Rob Leland
Ted Husted wrote: Do we have many more constants to add right now? How about if we stay the course though the 1.1 release, for consistency, +1 We should probably go ahead deprecate the Action statics that pass through references to Globals, so we can change it all over on the next run. Ab

Action.java & Globals.java questions.

2002-11-06 Thread Rob Leland
I know that the Globals were pulled out of Action.Java to prevent direct dependencies on Action.java Right now Action.java has duplicates KEYS fields from Globals.java. Some were for compatibility with 1.0, BUT some were added for Struts 1.1. Continuing to add new constants to BOTH creates dupli

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename "Application" componentsto "Module"

2002-11-02 Thread Rob Leland
The 3 methods are A) superclassing B) superclassing modified B) delegation. In thinking over superclassing vs delegation, I realized superclassing, if used in a modified form isn't so bad. However straight superclassing presents real design problems with inconsistent states between Modul

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/htmlImgTag.java

2002-11-01 Thread Rob Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dgraham 2002/11/01 16:28:12 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ImgTag.java Log: deprecated lowsrc attribute, removed todo to add support for IE specific events, ran code formatter. I would rather we hold off on reformatting the code righ

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename "Application" componentsto "Module"

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: So, this is a long-winded case of asking "why can't we do this"? * Move all the functionality of ApplicationConfig to ModuleConfig. * Make ApplicaitonConfig a subclass of ModuleConfig with no extra methods of its own. * Deprecate the ApplicationConfig class itself.

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14054] - Rename "Application" components

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Leland
Ted Husted wrote: 10/30/2002 1:29:38 PM, Robert Leland wrote: >>So, this is a long-winded case of asking "why can't we do this"? >The method public ApplicationConfig >ActionConfig.getApplicationConfig() >though this is only used 4 times in struts itself, it is public. >Which means we assume t

Re: Powered By Page

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Leland
David Graham wrote: I understand the criteria to be included on the powered by page to be that you either: 1. Put the powered by struts logo on a page or 2. include item 3 from the apache license on the page. I believe the criteria was not Struts specific. Just that they mention the Apache Fou

Re: Modules vs. Sub-Applications

2002-10-28 Thread Rob Leland
Ted Husted wrote: As these methods are really not part of the public API, could we not just change them now and be done with it? Some are Public, however I would also vote +1 to rename them now. I agree with David and say lets go one intermediate step and deprecate them for struts 1.1B3 but

Re: [struts-el] HTML taglib

2002-10-25 Thread Rob Leland
Eddie Bush wrote: Ok - this nearly *has* to be an issue with either Ant 1.4.1 or NB. Just for Reference to properly build Jakarta-Commons you'll need to use Ant 1.5.1. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide dev_validator.xml

2002-10-25 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: Speaking of David, I haven't heard from him in a while. What gives? Don't Know, last Email he sent to the list was in July, Sometimes life gets in the way. :-/ I emailed him today to ask if he wanted to donate the documentation from his web site to struts directly. We'll

Re: Now available: Validator 1.0 RC1

2002-10-22 Thread Rob Leland
Erik Hatcher wrote: Can this be dropped onto Struts 1.1b2 or do I need to use a nightly Struts build? There have been public methods added to some classes, but that is about it. I don't believe this causes a problem as it does with C++, but I could be wrong. Also, there have been a few Validato

Re: [VOTE] James Mitchell as Struts Committer

2002-10-22 Thread Rob Leland
James, +1 Use the force wisely ! -Rob Ted Husted wrote: James Mitchell has been a long-time contributor of good ideas as well as patches on the developer list. He is also generous with his help on the user list. I believe it's time that we nominated James as a Committer. After all, we can

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11950] - Missing

2002-10-20 Thread Rob Leland
James Holmes wrote: Are you sure this is all fixed now?? If you run the example app there is some spurious output from the JavaScript stuff I believe you are working on. "// End -->" shows up on the bottom of the page. Yes, It and the jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util PropertyMessageResources.java

2002-10-16 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: > Hi Rob, I don’t think those lines were doing what you thought. Without > them, there is no support for inherited messages. Since doIt was a local variable I don't see how that impacts inherited messages. When the code below the while loop is executed doIt is always true,

Re: [Policy on depreciation vs deleting new Struts 1.1 methods.]

2002-10-13 Thread Rob Leland
edgar wrote: > I disagree. > > The most useful method of timing releases for both developers and users > Is when the features reach critical mass. Edgar, I definately understand that upgrading is a pain. At work we are required to build all code from its sources, then we have to test etc. At t

[SHORT TERM PLAN]

2002-10-13 Thread Rob Leland
Validator - Rob Leland, JavaDoc - Any incorrect JavaDoc IntelliJ catches. Refactoring - When it makes sense, currently Integrating the ApplicationConfig access a little more into the framework. I.E. code for access the ApplicationConfig

Re: TODO sections

2002-10-13 Thread Rob Leland
Ted Husted wrote: > James Mitchell wrote: > >> Can anyone tell me who's doing which? For myself I am concentrating on the Validator code. Luckly James Turner a commons committer has been actively working towards a release. Any problems/questions I have with the commons-validator get addressed pr

[Policy on depreciation vs deleting new Struts 1.1 methods.]

2002-10-12 Thread Rob Leland
I same across a method in Action that didn't use one of its parameters, it was added in struts 1.1 the comment said. Since it was added in the 1.1 Time Frame do we: A) Immediately remove it or B) Depreciate the method and remove it later. My preference would be to remove it before the fin

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator ValidatorPlugIn.java

2002-10-12 Thread Rob Leland
I can get to it some time this weekend, though if Martin wishes to fix it that is great also... Which bring up another question...see [Policy on depreciation vs deleting] -Rob Eddie Bush wrote: > Yes. My goal was to not create a session just to get at the > ServletContext though. That's why I

Re: Need help figuring out how I broke Struts-EL unit tests

2002-10-12 Thread Rob Leland
David M. Karr wrote: >>"Ted" == Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ted> Are you using Ant 1.5? I know to build Commons I needed Ant 1.5.1 -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] New Struts Committer: Eddie Bush

2002-10-07 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > I'd like to propose Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer on the > Struts project. +1 [Vote/Patches/Granularity/Linux how do they do it/Alternate Release] [Vote] I believe this project can benefit from a more timely application of patches. (I am currently

Re: Help getting remote CVS set up

2002-09-20 Thread Rob Leland
David cygwin will fo all you need, here is the line I use : ssh -L 2401:localhost:2401 -l rleland -N cvs.apache.org which is in a bat file. in wincvs: CVSROOT : rleland@localhost:/home/cvs authentication: "passwd file" on local host. I use to use MindTerm until they became a full blown commerci

Re: How to extend AppException

2002-09-19 Thread Rob Leland
phpsurf wrote: > Hi > > when looking at the default ExceptionHandler implementation, I saw that > there was a special behaviour when handling > org.apache.struts.util.AppException. > ... > But the problem is that its properties are private instead of protected, so > it's quite difficult to add s

Re: [VOTE] David M. Karr as a Struts Committer

2002-09-19 Thread Rob Leland
+1 Rob Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > I'd like to propose David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer on -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/utilStrutsValidator.java

2002-08-25 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, James Turner wrote: > >>Thanks for the commit. One minor request? I've done significant amounts >>of hackage on that file now, and it's probably appropriate for me to be in >>the authors list at the top. >> > > > +1. James sorry, I wasn't a

Credit for StrutsValidator

2002-08-24 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, James Turner wrote: > >> Thanks for the commit. One minor request? I've done significant amounts >> of hackage on that file now, and it's probably appropriate for me to >> be in >> the authors list at the top. >> > > > +1. James sorry, I wa

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Rob Leland
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > >Are the other committers interested in working towards such a goal? > +1, I'll try to finish up the UML for classes. and put in place holders for the added package descriptions. Plus pitch in else where. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: multipart requests + forwarding = bug

2002-06-26 Thread Rob Leland
you are >referring to bug reports about the multipart requests and forwarding, there >are a couple in bugzilla already. > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8732 >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9760 (duplicate) > >Hal > >>-Original M

multipart requests + forwarding = bug

2002-06-25 Thread Rob Leland
I haven't experienced this bug but my office mate mentioned he experienced it, he is not here today. There also seems to been some discussion, and several different patches floating around to fix this. If this is still a problem could someone who has experienced this file a BUG report at http://n

Re: MessageResources

2002-06-20 Thread Rob Leland
James Mitchell wrote: > Struts gurus, this was in response to someone > (I doubt that I'm the only one) asking about having > the resource bundle loaded from xml file(s). I know this is a "commons question, but ... About a year ago March 2001 ? the same request was made. I am pretty sure the c

NestedNotEqualsTag doesn't implement NestedPropertySupport

2002-03-29 Thread Rob Leland
In doing the UML for the nested Logic tags I noticed that the NestedNotLogicEqual doesn't implement NestedPropertySupport public class NestedEqualTag extends EqualTag implements NestedPropertySupport, NestedNameSupport { public class NestedNotEqualTag extends NotEqualTag implements NestedNameS

(Ted) Struts UML Action Diagrams

2002-03-29 Thread Rob Leland
Ted, you sent me the URL of some nice interaction Diagrams. These might have a place in the JavaDoc or Users Guide, could you resent that URL ? -Rob -- Robert Leland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 804 N. Kenmore Street Arlington, VA 22201-2225 Voice: 703-525-3580 -- To

Re: NestedFormTag in cvs head

2002-03-19 Thread Rob Leland
David Winterfeldt wrote: > v1.3 of > src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html/NestedFormTag.java > won't compile for me. > David I bet you are using Tomcat 3.X, JSP 1.1 ? I believe it uses a JSP 1.2 construct. -Rob -- Robert Leland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 804 N. Kenmore Street Arlingt

Re: Unnecessary multiple URLEncoder.encode() in RequestUtils

2002-03-18 Thread Rob Leland
Patches are always welcome, follow the directions here: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/bugs.html To submit a bug report. I would recommend filling the bug report as opposed to posting a patch to the mailing list. Johannes Carlén wrote: > Hi, > I was running our application with JProbe and > d

[INTERm WORK] was: [Proposal] Doc addition for Struts 1.1

2002-03-14 Thread Rob Leland
Since there was no response to this can I assume then it was a +0 ? If so I'll begin checking in javadoc changes this weekend. > Proposal: > For Struts Release 1.1: > 1) Include UML diagrams directly in JavaDoc, > by using the doc-files directory. > 2) Have the JavaDoc and Programmer

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 1 Release Plan

2002-03-11 Thread Rob Leland
-- Vote:Struts 1.1b1 Release Plan [X] +1I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it [ ] -0I am not in favor of the release

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean CookieTag.java DefineTag.java HeaderTag.java PageTag.java ParameterTag.java SizeTag.java StrutsTag.java

2001-04-23 Thread Rob Leland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > craigmcc01/04/23 15:52:22 > > Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/bean CookieTag.java > DefineTag.java HeaderTag.java PageTag.java > ParameterTag.java SizeTag.java StrutsTag.java > Log: > Remove un

Re: Trouble with Struts nightly build distribution

2001-04-23 Thread Rob Leland
For me I get a sealing violation when trying to build with 'ant all' using the build.properties, this is a class path problem I can fix. Perhaps there should be a class path entry in build.properties. Note, I can still build the distribution with the build.bat file which isn't officialy supporte

Re: FOLLOWUP: struts-config_1_0.dtd location when not connected to internet

2001-04-09 Thread Rob Leland
That was the same fix that was made to struts about a month ago, it now has a copy of the DTD in the jar file. I am also using JBuilder4 and since this change it works ok for me. -Rob "Young, Wayne" wrote: > > I finally got back to working this issue. Recall, I was having the trouble > running

Re: package.html for action

2001-03-30 Thread Rob Leland
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > will become the User Guide for the controller framework. Sound OK? Sounds good, I'll do it this weekend. Along with a Credits.txt or some such to acknowledge the original authors. -Rob

Re: package.html for action

2001-03-30 Thread Rob Leland
agree. For example, the User's Guide for the o.a.s.action package could > also talk about things like subclassing ActionServlet to specialize its > behavior. > > On a slightly separate note, a piece of doc that would be incredibly > helpful here is a UML Sequence Diagram of the basi

Re: struts-config_1_0.dtd location when not connected to internet

2001-03-30 Thread Rob Leland
About 3 weeks ago, the DTD was included in the struts.jar to fix this problem. Try a recient nightly build. -Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I believe that if you place the dtd in a resources folder inside the > org.apache.struts folder and compile it should work correctly. > > >

Re: dropdown values gone after validation error

2001-03-29 Thread Rob Leland
"Young, Wayne" wrote: > > I have the following struts/JSP fragment that creates a dropdown with values > from the networkTypes attribute. > > > > > > The networkTypes attribute is created in the "getNetworkTypes" action that Is getNetworkTypes an Iterator, Vector, ArrayList. I have notic

  1   2   >