Edgar P Dollin wrote:
1) It is fine that the basic tags in struts don't emit non-standard html,
but why do struts tags have to 'police' the emission of non-html. For many
intranet style projects, non standard html is important to achieve specific
required functionality. To deny the need for such
to see a more detailed description of what you're thinking
about to know whether it would fit in, but I assume you're talking about
something more than the "disabled" and "readonly" attributes that
already exist?
Edgar
Craig
-Original Message-
In the beginning, there was no Jakarta Taglibs, or inkling of something
like JSTL. So, Craig bravely put together a useful implementation of
some custom tags that did two things. First, they exposed the internals
of the Struts Controller framework. Second, they provided some basic
functionality
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
> --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Of course if I really want that I should probably just use
Velocity, huh? ;)
+1. I do =:)
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields
k to
support. Ted has mentioned something similar to this before.
David
>
> Edgar
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Edi
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> > However, at this time, we have a Struts-el tag
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Gastin wrote:
> > As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
> > beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
> > political topic in the Struts community.
>
> There was a time when we were encourag
> From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:07 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> David Graham wrote:
> > There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhancements:
> > 1. Fun
David Graham wrote:
There are 3 things that earn my -1 on tag enhancements:
1. Functionality already provided by the JSTL.
Just as an aside, I believe by -1 David means that he won't volunteer
his own time to the issue. As a volunteer, this is his absolute right.
But, since the Struts minimum pl
Chris Gastin wrote:
> As I can tell from the list I have opened topic that is pretty well
> beaten. Let me first apologize. I did not realize this was such a
> political topic in the Struts community.
There was a time when we were encouraging people to use the JSTL, and
there was a political bent
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Graham wrote:
>
> >--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
> >>find
> >>it.
> >>
> >>How about two simple changes:
> >>1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes()
ham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
> Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> >
> > --- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > &
Chris Gastin wrote:
Rob:
I am not an contributer, but I am a young developer. I am willing to step up
and support these abilities in the struts tags
Great !
I have come to believe that young/single developers & older/grown
kids/empty nesters developers are better
situated to be Open Source dev
nt: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> David Graham wrote:
>
> >--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and could
David Graham wrote:
--- Sgarlata Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, here's another idea. I searched the archives for it and couldn't
find
it.
How about two simple changes:
1) Add a new renderExtraAttributes() method that gives people the chance
to
throw non-standard HTML into their tags that
Sounds good. I'll put some thought into it.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static T
ut loose from struts and a
> > > different group of committers were responsible for them. I wouldn't,
> > > nor
> > > would I expect anyone else interested in the tags to make any time
> > > commitment with the current 'RULES' placed on the tags, i.e. ONLY emit
&
m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
> --- Edgar P Dollin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it is more than a 'prefere
rs
functionality not provided by the JSTL; however, if other tags need
refactoring I'm willing to work on those as well.
Does this sound reasonable?
David
>
> Niall
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts
advance if this has been discussed before. ([OT] I
> really
> wish there was an easier way to search the archives. I have resorted to
> googling them, but it's still a pain.)
>
> Matt
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to
googling them, but it's still a pain.)
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
to
googling them, but it's still a pain.)
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:39 PM
Subject: RE: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> Whenever tag extendability enhancements are discussed, we always hear
> complaints from a vocal minority but
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> >
> >
> > It's only a "political football" in the sense that most of
> > the curr
lanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:23 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> It's only a "political football" in the sense that most of
> the current
> committers would prefer
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend
without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not
come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the
tags are such a political football on this list.
Edgar
Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the tags were structured differently so they were easier to extend
without breaking when new releases of struts come out these issues might not
come up. Of course, I myself have resigned myself to this issue since the
tags are such a political football on this list.
Edgar
David Graham wrote:
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
> and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts
> tags.
>
> I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
> though other committers might not.
>
> The
D]>
> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> > Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
> > and probably has been implem
Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Has anyone ever discussed adding a general-purpose "attributes" attribute to
the tag library to support non-standard HTML like this? For example,
Yes, it was vetoed by several committers. Search the archives.
--
nal Message-
> From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:23 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
>
>
> Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3
> years, and probably h
t...
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Editable Fields V/S Static Text
> Yes, This has been brought up many times o
Yes, This has been brought up many times over the last 3 years,
and probably has been implemented several times extending the Struts tags.
I am not opposed to such a feature, and would support it,
though other committers might not.
The key argument against it is that it would transform the html tag
You could use a JSP expression to output the readonly='true' attribute of
the html:text or use the html-el library and use jstl to evaluate the
attribute.
Edgar
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Gastin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL
37 matches
Mail list logo
