On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Arquivos wrote:
> i need to forward all the requests going out by the port 53 (DNS) to a
> single external DNS server, in dispite off the DNS configured in the
> clients. Can someone help me in that?
What you want is a NAT Port Forward entry on your LAN interface
I'm trying to build a dialup router on an HP t5710. It has 512 MB of
flash and a single serial port, which I intend to use for an external
modem. I'm wondering if a generic install of 1.2.3 or 2.0 will fit on
the 512 MB of flash, or can I do an embedded install and disable the
console so that the s
Happy Birthday, eh. (Canadian)
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/1107
>
> Fixing that broke PPPoE entirely on AMD64, doubt if that gets fixed for 2.0.
Can you please clarify? Are you saying that folks who use PPPoE on the
WAN should not update to the newer 2.0 snaps unt
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> ps: how ofter do nanobsd images are updated ? there is just this from July
> 4th and no more available.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,38687.0.html
db
-
To unsu
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> I'll probably kick myself when I figure this one out
And the answer is...
traffic shaper. I'm so embarrassed. ::Off to kick self::
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Try to tune these sysctl:
> net.isr.numthreads: 1
> net.isr.bindthreads: 0
> net.isr.direct: 1
> net.isr.direct_force: 1
I tried those in System: Advanced: System Tunables. Throughput is
still 17.4 Mbps between vlan240 and any other. Does pfs
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> Are you passing the VLAN tags all the way into the pfSense VM on a single
> vNIC, or are you splitting the VLANs at the vSwitch level and passing them
> into multiple vNICs on the pfSense VM?
Adam,
Thanks for the info. In fact, pfsense is
2.0-RC3 (amd64)
built on Tue Jul 12 21:23:55 EDT 2011
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:52 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> I hope that's not too confusing. To summarize, any two machines, real
> or virtual, get iperf results near wire speed when on the same L2
> network. Any two machine
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> Can anyone else confirm what appears to be either a bug in the logging with
> respect to the timestamps or a bug in the sorting of the log entries? (I
> don’t know which)
I've seen it here and I suspect the problem is with the timestamps,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 6:09 AM, Jostein Elvaker Haande
wrote:
> I have the same problem on one of my pfSense installations, with a
> Realtek 8112 chipset (onboard NIC). The card refuses to come up on
> every even numbered boot (which occurs quite often, seeing as it's
> being run with 2.0RCx). Th
I'll probably kick myself when I figure this one out, but here's a
riddle for you.
pfsense is 2.0RC3. Atom D510 (2x1.6GHz, GBE)
Clear DF bit: enabled
Scrub: disabled
I have a number of real and virtual hosts (single ESXi server with
vlans) connected to pfsense through a Netgear gigabit switch usi
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> Well, this is a little annoying. I have RC1 too, and I had checked only
> about a week ago, and there is no newer than RC1 on the servers
The images are labelled RC1, but if you install them they will show up
in your dashboard and console
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Steven Sherwood wrote:
> Hi there - I assume that you are using multiple modems? Should be possible
> to create VLANs and have multiple PPPoE sessions, one on each VLAN. You will
> need a VLAN capable switch upstream of you pfSense box for connecting the
> mo
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Roberto Nunnari
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just discovered that modifications to the firewall rules will not be
> active until the box is rebooted..
>
> Is it a known bug or a misconfiguration on my side?
Did you try this?
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Reset_States
d
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andreas Kaiser wrote:
>> That allows you to do any routing you want between interfaces / WAN and
>> gives you granular control of everything.
>
> *That* is exactly what I want ;-)
Have you turned off automatic outbound NAT and disabled or deleted all
the automat
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, A Mohan Rao wrote:
> not able to do client side open vpn setup properly any body can help for
> which open vpn client i have to download and install run properly i have to
> do server side setup which is i have to attached video.
>
>
> Awaiting for positive respons
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote:
>>
>> Alix running pf 20 RC1 nano. Trying to change from default 192.168.1.x
>> network to 192.168.100.x on the LAN interface - nothing fancy.
>>
>> WHAT I DID
>> With DHCP enabled and servin
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Shibashish wrote:
> My pfSense box says
>
> real memory = 12884901888 (12288 MB)
> avail memory = 2567946240 (2448 MB)
>
> How can i ask pfSense to use more memory?
Use the 64-bit version.
> I tried the 64-bit version
> but it kept crashing, hence reverted back
Was down briefly here, but up now.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:25 PM, - Dickie Bradford -
wrote:
> Is it possible to do backup on a 1.2.3 machine and reload it with a fresh2.0
> and reload the backup?
Yes. The only issues I've seen come up in the forum are from users who
have international characters in the config file. Delete those
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Luke Jaeger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have squid configured as transparent proxy on my network.
The point of transparent proxy is that it doesn't require any system
or browser proxy setting; it intercepts all http requests from the
user on the active interfaces. I su
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:02 AM, David Burgess wrote:
>>
>> But openconnect works, at least for me on Linux, and from what I
>> gather it's available for FreeBSD too. What are the chances of
>> installing ope
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> I have to transfer a config from one server to another. Looking at the backup
> I can replace the ifnames and correlate the vlans etc but I am wondering about
> the nat/filter pair id's or any other caveats?
I have moved a config back and
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 3:49 PM, k_o_l wrote:
> Since I installed 2.0-RC1 last Friday I’ve noticed RRD at least on two
> different occasion stopped collecting data see attached.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,33154.0.html
db
-
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> Does anyone else see why this is annoying?
I lost all understanding of this thread many posts back.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For addition
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Tollison wrote:
> That kills my theories. Must still be driver or kernel. Wonder if one of the
> panic fixes caused the issue I am seeing. Ermal did some voodoo that I
> didn't understand today. Worked better, but not completely fixed. Glad to
> see we have at
Client.
Sent from my phone.
On 2011 3 4 20:14, "Kevin Tollison" wrote:
> What about openVPN?
> --
> Kevin Tollison
>
> Sent from my Blackberry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Burgess
> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 20:12:21
> To:
> Reply-To: supp
On 2011 3 4 20:09, "Kevin Tollison" wrote:
>
> 2 B5 was good until a month or so ago. Are you using any vlans? I am
beginning to think it may be in vlans.
Yes. One of my onboards has 8 vlans and the other 5.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Kevin Tollison wrote:
> Sorry for the top post. (BlackBerry)
>
> I worked with Scott and Ermal a while today on an em issue. Ermal was able to
> improve the situation some, but it is still not resolved. I had to bail on
> him.
>
> Is anyone experiencing traffic to
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:12 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> If
> you want to spend a little more for that 'instant' feel, I can tell
> you that a Core i3 550 on the same connection feels pretty much
> instant
To clarify, I was referring to navigating the UI. All of the ha
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Eric Feldhusen
wrote:
> As part of a regional education service agency to multiple K-12 school
> districts, we're talking about using pfSense for our nat/firewalling for
> approximately 5000+ workstations on a 30-40 Mbps internet uplink. Any one
> on the list hav
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> Since the switch to the Yandex Intel drivers a couple days ago my VMs
> all constantly print watchdog timeouts on the console... It seems to
> operate OK, but it makes the console useless.
I, for one, welcome our new console-crapping overlords
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
> The current 2.0 snapshots have a different driver for the Intel gigabit
> cards. We switched to the Yandex drivers to debug driver issues with the
> Intel supplied ones.
I wondered. The difference on this system is positive and obvious.
> This h
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:21 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:44 AM, David Burgess wrote:
>
>> the NIC is sending and receiving a total of about 530
>> mbit x2 during the test.
>
> This gets worse I'm afraid.
Well, some good news. I have reinsta
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:44 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> the NIC is sending and receiving a total of about 530
> mbit x2 during the test.
This gets worse I'm afraid.
I recreated my setup, substituting a GS724T switch in for the GS108E,
hoping the switch might be the bottleneck. Aga
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
> I'm routing it from one interface to another although it's destination is
> also a VLAN on that other interface. Maybe that's where the issue lies.
It would be unfortunate if vlan-vlan traffic on a given interface has
its maximum throughput redu
2.0-RC1 (amd64)
built on Tue Mar 1 15:52:28 EST 2011
Core i3 550 3.2 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel GBE
I've just set this system up doing some crude throughput testing with
iperf. The most I can push through this box from LAN to WAN is a
steady 503-520 mbps, using the default mtu (higher mtu values produce
n
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Shali K.R. wrote:
> Dear db,
>
> i have tried this, but it showing a high bandwidth usage, is this a proper
> way??
I uninstalled the squid package about three months ago, unable to get
it to function properly. I will try it again when pfsense 2.0 is
stable, and p
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Shali K.R. wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am having 500 windows client machines connected through pfSense and squid,
> please suggest me a suitable method for handling updates.
You'll find the appropriate info here:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Squid_Package_Tuning
The 2.0 snapshots include a usb image. Installing 1.2.3 from usb will be a
bit of a trick, as you have learned.
db
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:25 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> I recently read a page in the pfsense docs (can't find it in the wiki or
> FAQ now), which I believe quoted the pfsense book (don't have it),
> where cmb states that pfsense is the best open source firewall, and
> one
An article popped up on /. today, and although it's a poorly written
article, some of the ensuing discussion did provoke some thought.
http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/02/01/181200/Firewalls-Make-DDoS-Attacks-Worse
I think the article is mostly just scare marketing, but it raises the
question of h
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> After an upgrade to this morning’s snap, I received the following after the
> upgrade/reboot (it’s what’s on my PuTTY atm):
This looks a lot like what's being discussed here, although I don't
see the em driver implicated in your output:
ht
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> pfSense 2.0, most recent builds
>
>
>
> When I go to status/traffic graph, the graph is correct but the list of
> hosts is not. I don’t know if there’s something I’m not doing, but here’s
> what I did to test it:
>
> Put a windows machine (m
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Shali K.R. wrote:
>
> sir ..
> In my pfsense traffic graphic shows WAN in 4 Mbps LAN out 1Mbps Why this
> differenceanything wrong with mypfsense?
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,31855.0.html
For pcap use tcpdump on the pfsense console.
bd
--
I'm familiar with the hardware sizing guide, and I've done a few
benchmarks myself, but I'm wondering if a MHz is a MHz when it comes
to pf performance, or do things like IPC and cache sizes matter? What
about RAM frequencies and latency?
Putting encryption and the various pfsense packages aside,
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Bruce B wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> I am facing a dilemma here. If I port forward 1-2 to my first
> Asterisk server which sets behind pfSense v1.2.3 then I have two way audio.
> If I remove it I don't have any audio but call establishes.
> Now, I have a second
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Shali K.R. wrote:
> Dear sir,
>
> How can i create rule for out going? i already created all allow rule for
> OPT1 in firewal-> Rules
When you create a firewall rule on an interface, that rule will govern
only packets arriving on that interface, not leaving it. S
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Shali K.R. wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have 2 WAN ( Static and another PPPOE )connections and a LAN connection
>
>
> i added PPPOE as WAN and static as OPT1 two connections are active and i
> added a firewall rule for OPT1 allow all to all then i check the
> connect
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
> Phase one applies the configuration.
>
> Phase two rolls it back if you don't confirm it. So if you did something
> that blocked you out of the device for example, it would auto roll back.
Ubiquiti's AirOS 5 has a "change" button which up
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Bruce B wrote:
> So, if I am on:
> 1 pfsense
> and do an upgrade, does the upgrade apply to "1 pfsense" or "2 pfsense" ?
If you booted from 1 then upgraded, it will overwrite the 2 slice.
> Also, rather using the Console Cable each time, can I change settings
> s
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Dimitri Rodis
wrote:
> if that
> doesn’t work, you can use the gui to boot off of the old slice. Very nice
> and easy.
Or if it /really/ doesn't work you can use the initial boot menu to
choose the other slice at boot time. You will see something like this:
1 pfs
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> I am trying to download a large iso from microsoft.com. At some point
> (different every time), the download stalls on the client.
Sorry, forgot to mention what I'm using.
2.0-BETA5 (amd64)
built on Tue Jan 4 02:47:18 EST
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Nicolas Roussi
wrote:
> Would this setup be sufficient?
Depends on the bandwidth limits you will put on your clients. I have
2.0 with squid running on an Atom D510 with 4GB RAM and a 40/4 mbps
mlppp connection and it has no trouble. This is servicing 6 clients
wit
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> The cheapest new hardware option I'm aware of that can do 6 or more
> NICs is a Soekris 5501 with a dual or quad port card, for 6-8 ports.
> About $375-400. That's the only very low power option I'm aware of,
> should draw under 10 wt.
I
I'm annoyed by the recurrence of posts like this:
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25224935-
I see the Linux myth is debunked in the FAQ, but is there something
substantial that I can link to that states or demonstrates that
pfsense is adequately administered from the UI for most non-dev users?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I understand double-nat thing and can certainly configure that,
> but the simpler the better, I'd prefer to have public IP (range) on pfSense
> box.
Best case scenario you get a public IP on pfsense, but worst case you
can turn off NAT i
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Or if you can answer more generally what is genereal pfSense set up if you
> get DSL line from ISP?
I'm not familiar with that Netgear or PPPoA. My DSL uses PPPoE, and I
have two options for handling that login:
1. modem in bridge mod
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Scott Benson wrote:
> [r...@host]/conf(17): mkdir blah
> mkdir: blah: Read-only file system
> [1.2.3-RELEASE]
> [r...@host]/conf(18):
/etc/rc.conf_mount_rw
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: suppor
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> Can somebody please tell me the cisco equivalent of a firewall rule
> that will keep state?
After some closer inspection I don`t think there is a Cisco firewall
on site at all, just a router and layer 3 switching. I talked to the
Cisco
Is there any public plan for a 2.0 book? I sure would like to pick one up.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support available - htt
Can somebody please tell me the cisco equivalent of a firewall rule
that will keep state? I have hosts (Windows and pfSense) on opposite
sides of a cisco firewall and router which I don't control. When I try
to reach pfSense from Windows, tcpdump shows that pfSense is receiving
the packet and respo
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM, k_o_l wrote:
> “There has been an error creating the graphs, please check
> your system logs”
>
> I would like to keep my RRD data is there a work around?
This has been discussed in the forum, and IIRC, the only solution that
was offered was to delete the graphing
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:21 AM, David Burgess wrote:
>> Is there a way to connect pfsense with an Anyconnect server?
>
> No, that's Cisco proprietary.
But openconnect works, at least for me on Linux, and from what I
g
Is there a way to connect pfsense with an Anyconnect server? Google
isn't turning up much for me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial supp
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I would suggest to tcpdump. This way you for sure will know where these
> packets are coming from.
Thanks for the hint. tcpdump confirms that these are coming from
pppoe0, so I'll be talking to my ISP.
db
--
My WAN is mlppp with a static public IP address. pfSense is 2.0 beta4.
Out of curiosity I disabled the check box on the WAN config page to
block private networks. I then created an alias for RFC1918 and
loopback addresses and manually created a logging reject rule at the
top of the WAN rules for t
pfsense is setup like this:
pfsense--WAN (public IP x)
--OPT1 (public IP y/30)
Connected to OPT1 is client's cisco firewall which is NATing for a
172.21.50/23 subnet. Their dhcp is handing out pfsense's OPT1 address
as DNS server, and pfsense is running DNS forwarder. This works well,
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
> I searched the pfsense forum and found someone with
> a similar issue. ermal suggested to disable the shaper on the wireless
> interface. This seems to fix the problem for me.
>
> Is this a known bug? Any better workaround than disabling the
On 2010-11-19 9:56 AM, "Richard Amerman" wrote:
> I do this all the time and using a separate nic is simpler and easier to
> manage than an alias. Unless I am missing something, a vlan for this case
is
> overkill.
I discussed this with the m0n0wall list back in '07 where cmb and others
essentiall
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:51 PM, fi...@7technw.com wrote:
> Another easy solution is to just add another nic.
Not an option in this case. The OP described a wireless network where
the client subnet and management subnet exist on the same physical
network. You can't change that in this case, so yo
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> I think the OP was referring to running two subnets concurrently on the
> same wire, something I often have to do for various reasons, sometimes to
> solve co-existence issues while renumbering a network. I have no idea how
> to accomplish t
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Fred Boiteux wrote:
> The different LAN subnets' trafic aren't VLAN tagged, and all traffic
> comes from one Ethernet port (from the nearest antenna), so I don't
> understand how VLAN could be used there ?
Most carrier-grade radios support tagging packets from t
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Яков Тенилин wrote:
> get this message:An HTTP_REFERER was detected
> other than what is defined in System -> Advanced. $_SERVER['HTTP_REFERER'] .
> .You can disable this check if needed in System -> Advanced -> Admin.
> In administrative settings, this feature of
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Neonicacid wrote:
> David,
>
> I don't have a single switch big enough to support all of the devices that I
> currently have on the network. The routers help with that by providing extra
> ports to connect devices with.
So the simplest way to accomplish this is to
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Neonicacid wrote:
> My main issue with how it is set up right now is that File and Printer
> Sharing does not jump across the subnets, so none of the computers can
> communicate.
>
> Does anyone have any advice or solutions for this problem?
>
If you want all you
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Gerald Waugh
wrote:
> We use bridging as the pfsense machine firewalls servers with public IP
> addresses. Clues on how to accomplish with routing appreciated.
You have a public subnet from your ISP, 1.1.1.0/24, for example.
You get a static IP from your ISP th
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> If you want to take advantage of Linux' TRIM support, you should be
> using NFS. TRIM support (AFAIK) requires underlying knowledge of the
> filesystem or at least the block allocation... iSCSI hides all of those
> details, as it merely exp
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
> iSCSI is relatively excellent - and as a block device, has great performance.
> I've had less than pleasing results with AOE in several different use-cases.
>
> If you want to share the cache across multiple firewalls, NFS is your only
After some contemplation I think I would like to run squid on my
pfsense box, but mount the squid cache directory (/var/squid) on an
external host. After some research, I believe the following options
would provide the best performance with the least overhead, in
descending order:
1. AoE http://
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, James Bensley wrote:
>can the pfSense box handle incoming balancing this
> way as well as out going?
Incoming load balancing in pfsense is different from outgoing load
balancing. It allows you to have more than one server on your internal
networks responding to i
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:33 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> Thanks guys for your responses, I will look into MLPPP but in the mean
> time, with regards to load balancing; Again, how does this work in
> pfSense?
For 1.2:
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/MultiWanVersion1.2
For 2.0:
http://forum.pfsen
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:53 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> Hello Everybody :)
>
> I would like to use the LAGG to bond multiple ADSL lines for a faster,
> more reliable internet access (using LACP).
LAGG acts by bonding multiple interfaces at layer 2. You're trying to
bond a pair of interfaces at la
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Christian Borchert wrote:
> I have tried this network card in another machine (HP Core 2 Quad) and it
> works perfectly under the same test conditions.
I have limited experience with Dell servers, but I have found some of
their newer laptops (Vostro and Latitude
Why is it that when I browse the list archives for this month (gmane
and marc), I only see 2 threads? Specifically I'm looking for a link
to the ongoing discussion started by Luke Jaeger on script-heavy
sites, and I don't see it there. Likewise, when I search the archive
for his name I get no hits.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> I just installed 2.0-BETA4, logged in as admin, and created a new user.
> I have not been able to find a logout link so I can try using that user.
> Is it there and I just don't see it or is it really not there?
> - Yehuda
Under the first menu
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:46 AM, belkhiria aymen
wrote:
> Hi,
> I need to configure siproxd as Sip proxy for external users.
I don't think siproxd is designed for this, nor is it necessary.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-u
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> -how to i break up the large block into smaller blocks
Like this?
http://www.vlsm-calc.net/
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional c
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> I did what i needed to do for the time being though. much appreciated.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call poaching the solution ;)
If this list ran on a points system I would get a flogging now.
db
-
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> wan rules
> proto source port dest
> port gw
> block * 216.127.61.72 * *
> * *
>
> lan rules
> block * *
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Ron Lemon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I have switched the rules but I am still unable to ping 10.0.1.100 from any
> machine in 10.0.0.0 / 24
Just to be sure, I have attached (I hope it makes it through) a
screenshot of the rule you should have on your LAN interface.
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Ron Lemon wrote:
> Action: Pass
> Interface: LAN
> Protocol: any (I assume this also include ICMP???)
> Source: Single Host (10.0.1.100)
> Destination: Network (10.0.0.0 / 24)
> Gateway: default
>
> To me this means that 10.0.1.100 can talk to any machine in
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Ron Lemon wrote:
> On LAN interface I created PASS on LAN for ANY protocol from 10.0.1.100 / 32
> (Single Host) on any port to network 10.0.0.0 / 24
>
> On LAN interface I created PASS on LAN for ANY protocol from 10.0.1.101 / 32
> (Single Host) on any port to n
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Michel Servaes wrote:
> Thanks for the explaining - don't know if this dane-elec has
> wear-levelling though (I'd suspect they would mention this, if it was)
My understanding with SSDs (no idea if CFs are the same way) is that
wear-levelling works with available
So will this benefit the FreeBSD crowd any time soon?
http://www.osnews.com/story/23786/BREAKING_BROADCOM_OPEN_SOURCES_WIRELESS_DRIVERS
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Bob Gustafson wrote:
> I don't know the significance of 'embedded' in the context of CF cards.
Sorry, I meant to say I was paraphrasing Beat, not Bob. The pfsense
embedded version, which is recommended for CF installs, mounts the
filesystem read-only, and remounts
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Michel Servaes wrote:
> I am a bit worried about the fact that the CF card should be set read-only.
If I may paraphrase Bob, I thought he was meaning that "because/if you
are using the embedded version, the problem you describe must be due
to some other contributi
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
wrote:
> Thanks... I see no dates at all.
>
> About 2.0, I see no documentation around. Is there a list where to ask for
> 2.0 features explained?
Generally speaking, the forum is where most discussion around 2.0
happens, from what I have se
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Bradley D. Thornton
wrote:
> I thought there was about a 2GByte file size limit on Ext2 File systems too.
Not according to wikipedia, however "There are also many userspace
programs that can't handle files larger than 2 GB."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext2#Fil
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
