What if you enabled DNS Forwarder and forwarded All DNS Request to PFsense.
Ryan Rodrigue
P.O. Box 4336
Chief Technical Manager
Houma, LA 70361
A A R Electronics, Inc
Phone (985) 876-4096
510 West Tunnel Blvd
Phone (800) 649-7346
Houma, LA 70360
Fax (985) 853-0134
radiote...@aaremail.com
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> There is a PFSense 2 book available for the Kindle or paperback - in
> Amazon Store - just search for PFSENSE
I recommended the 1.2 book because he said he was running 1.2
Get it, Read It. It will help a lot I think.
http://www.amazon.com/pfSense-Definitive-Christopher-M-Buechler/dp/097903428
0
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:aoz@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 9:36 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] how to add the wifi
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 08:31, Ryan Rodrigue wrote:
> There is not a 100% definite answer to this. What I do
ok..please help me. how to block the bit torrent in pfsense 1.2.3
Thank you,
There is not a 100% definite answer to this. What I do is open the ports I
need (80 for http, 25 for smtp, ect and then put a block all rule below
these. This usually works for 99% of the bit torrent traffic.
You probably need to login to the Linksys and take it out of router mode and
put it in AP mode. Or at least turn of DHCP on the Linksys and connect it to
the LAN port instead of the WAN port. If you don't have a wifi card, you
will not have any WiFi setting in PFsense.
Ryan Rodrigue
I'm installing onto a seagate 320GB 2.5" hard drive, from a CD, both
connected via sata. I boot from the CD and have attempted to install
directly (press I) and continue (press C) into the liveCD boot, do a minimal
configuration (1 lan & 1 wan) and install from there (option 99). I'm using
the non
From: Nick Upson [mailto:n...@telensa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:56 AM
To: support pfsense
Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: install headache (part 2)
On 2 August 2011 11:19, Nick Upson wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to be systamatic about trying the combinations of variables, so
far
From: Shibashish [mailto:shi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:02 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Diffrent Gateway Adress ( External )
2011/6/14 Koray AGAYA
Thank you for your information
I added 1:1 NAT section like bellow I tested same resu
->Original Message-
>From: Luke Jaeger [mailto:ad...@pvpa.org]
>Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 8:31 AM
>To: support@pfsense.com
>Subject: [pfSense Support] allow/deny users by MAC address?
>
>I run a school network where students and teachers sometimes bring in
personal laptops.
>
I>s there
>In addition to this, and to controlling DHCP, as another poster mentioned,
>there is an audit method that may take some time, but can be automated to some
>degree.
>
>It's an interesting use of TTLs I saw discussed on another list - you have to
>keep track of the TTLs by the hosts on your net
>In addition to this, and to controlling DHCP, as another poster mentioned,
>there is an audit method that may take some time, but can be automated to some
>degree.
>
>It's an interesting use of TTLs I saw discussed on another list - you have to
>keep track of the TTLs by the hosts on your net
-Original Message-
From: Raylund Lai [mailto:raylund@kankanwoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:14 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] can't block https://facebook.com via firefox
I think the best is to combine DNS and firewall rule.
Using something like
-Original Message-
From: Luke Jaeger [mailto:ad...@pvpa.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:59 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] can't block https://facebook.com via firefox
>
>Yes, I'm sure - facebook.com is explicitly blocked in my squid blacklist
and the sha
Could you use virtual IPs assigned to the wan interface? I use them now for
a different subnet and it works fine for me. I assign the virtual IP and
use 1:1 nat.
Ryan
Rodrigue
-Original Message-
From: Sean Cavanaugh [mailto:millenia2...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 6:27 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Firewall security compromised by auxillary
programs?
?-Original Message-
From: Mark Jones
Sent: Friday, Februa
2011/1/26 İhsan Doğan :
>>> I've bought recently a Shuttle XPC-35 and unfortunately this
>>> hardware does not run with FreeBSD 8.1, but it does with FreeBSD 8.2.
>>>
>>> Are there any plans to run pfSense 2.0 with FreeBSD 8.2?
>>
Not my first choice, but you could try to load some hypervisor
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:51 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] changing LAN to WAN
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Nick Upson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an existing pfsense setup with
they
got cleaver and changed their mac, that wouldn't work either. Just a
thought. Feel free to blast away.
Description: Description: Description:
C:\Users\Ryan\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\AARElectronics3.gifRyan
Rodrigue
P.O. Box 4336
Systems Technician
Houma, LA 70361
A A R E
-Original Message-
From: Tim Dickson [mailto:tdick...@aubergeresorts.com]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 4:54 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Assign custom Gateway
> Is there a way in PF to have dhcp assign a custom gateway in the
> static dhcp setup.
Why
From: Ryan L. Rodrigue [mailto:radiote...@aaremail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 9:16 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Assign custom Gateway
Is there a way in PF to have dhcp assign a custom gateway in the static dhcp
setup.
A little info on what I am
rd is that?)
I am really just trying to keep things simple.
Thanks for any suggestions.
Ryan Rodrigue
P.O. Box 4336
Systems Technician
Houma, LA 70361
A A R Electronics, Inc
Phone (985) 876-4096
510 West Tunnel Blvd
Phone (800) 649-7346
Houma, LA 70360
Fax (985) 853-1034
radiote...@aa
, this will do nothing.
Ryan Rodrigue
P.O. Box 4336
Systems Technician
Houma, LA 70361
A A R Electronics, Inc
Phone (985) 876-4096
510 West Tunnel Blvd
Phone (800) 649-7346
Houma LA 70360
Fax (985) 853-1034
radiote...@aaremail.com
www.aarelectronics.com
> -Original Message-
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Ryan L. Rodrigue
> wrote:
>
> > 1. Broadvox is set to go out of a certain ISP that we have on
> > interface opt1. I don't see anywhere in the setting to
> specify this.
>
> Create a pass rule on the internal interfac
2. I assume I should put the broadvox settings in the gateways tab as a
new gateway. Am I correct in this?
3. Broadvox said they don't need a user name or password, just the
proper IP address. Is it ok to leave those fields blank?
Thanks for your help, Ryan
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 3:07 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFsense 2.0 CP auto authenticate
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Ryan wrote:
>
Is there a way in PFsense 2.0 to have captive portal auto authenticate all
IPs on a subnet. What I am wanting to do is limit all users to 1 Mbps each
(up and down) without needed them to authenticate.
This works well if I add an IP entry for each, but is there a way to do a
large group like a wh
>
> Anything that would show up in the top bar as an alert.
> Gateway failures aren't counted among those, however. Things
> like CARP changeovers would do that, and some other major things.
>
> I have some ideas for beefing that area up. I'm interesting
> in having an HDD space notification,
>
> If you have a DNS server for internal use in your org,
> consider putting zones on it that are authoritative for the
> sites you wish to block, then putting in a wildcard entry
> that points to 127.0.0.1
>
> I do that for all of the sites you mention, plus a few others.
>
I do this for
hat would be sent by these
notifications? Is there a place to adjust this. I mainly and looking for a
notice that a gateway id down. Thanks for the help.
Ryan
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5173 (20100604) __
The message was chec
Send the message a dozen more times. Maybe someone will respond. Ok I guess
by you repition that you set the states to 250 and it seems you still are
being limmited to 60mbps. When you installed it, what kernal did you select?
_
From: Cihan Saglamoz [mailto:cihan.sagla...@gm
> -Original Message-
> From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:m...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 9:36 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense Support] pfSense 1.2.3/2.0 doesn't boot on
> Axiomtek NA-820
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to install pfSense 1.2.3 on an Axiomt
> >
> Yeah, I missed that requirement on the first read-through.
> Didn't mean to give you a bum steer.
Thats OK. I've been running thes fail-over setup for a while and just now
thought of this senario. It worked when I tested it over a year ago because
i simply tested with ping. My wan
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:g...@s4f.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:24 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Multiwan and DNS forwarder
>
> Actually, the easier way to do this is to use policy routes.
> Create aliases called ISP1DN
>
> For such multi-WAN setups, I would recommend hard coding your
> DNS servers under System > General Setup and not allowing
> them to be overridden. Then add a static route for one of
> them so it always goes out your second WAN. Make sure the
> server you use will answer on the WAN for whi
First, this is the best routing product I have ever used. Ihad a box that was
up and running for over two years!!! It only rebooted because of a faiure in
my ups. I went ahead and updated to 1.2.3 seings as the system up time had
reset anyway. Thanks for the excellent work!!!
I have a Quest
ill perform faster than a home internet
connection. However a good gigabit switch with jumbo frame support will
allow you to transfer files quicker inside of your network. I guess the
answer to this depends on what you want to accomplish and how much you want
to spend.
I hope this helps
Just a stupid qestion, but can you setup a virtual IP for either your mail
server, your voip device or both?
Ryan Rodrigue
P.O. Box 4336
Systems Technician
Houma, LA 70361
A A R Electronics, Inc
Phone (985) 876-4096
510 West Tunnel Blvd
Phone (800) 649-7346
Houma LA 70360
Fax (985) 853-1034
> > Also I would like to ask. Can I block an iprange?
>
> The firewall lets you block CIDR networks. If your range
> doesn't fit neatly into a standard subnet then you have the
> choice of blocking the encapsulating subnet, or creating
> multiple rules to neatly cover the desired range.
>
> H
> Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:27:47PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> >> Check this one out. It should work just fine. Very inexpensive.
> >>
> >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101262
> >
I have actually looked at this. We use supermicro for some
> Hi Ryan,
>
> I'm just testing an atom wth re(4) but the NIC-Chip shouldn't
> be the problem.
> I started a thread in the Forum, so i don't want to crosspost here.
>
> http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,19808.0.html
>
> I just try to build a K
Does anyone make an atom board with intel onboard. I'd rather intel if i
had my choice. I have seen a couple of flexatx atom boards that look real
promising, but they don't have intel nics.
Ryan Rodrigue <http://www.aarelectronics.com/>
<http://www.aarelect
> -Original Message-
> From: Agi Subagio [mailto:a...@mbs.co.id]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:37 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense Support] package manager in 1.2.2
>
> just upgraded from 1.2-RELEASE to 1.2.2, but the package
> manager couldn't communicate wit
> I'm thinking about picking up a Supermicro Atom based system
> for use with pfSense:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015A-H.
> cfm?typ=H
>
> Any thoughts on potential issues with running pfSense on this
> hardware?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sterling Windmill
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:curtislamast...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:18 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Can captive portal
> authenticate based on windows login
>
> Barracuda bases logins 100% on IP add
a one set of credentials) is one thing, the
> captive portal's ability to automatically _receive_ (and
> authenticate) the credentials from the requesting
> client/browser is another. Unless I'm misunderstanding, Ryan
> wants to get rid of the username/password prompt fro
Ryan Rodrigue
Office: (985) 876-4096
Fax: (985) 853-0134
-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:dimit...@integritasystems.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 2:47 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Can captive portal authenticate based on
windows
>Without seeing the CP screen, automatically logging them in with Windows
credentials, no. You can authenticate them on.
>the CP screen with RADIUS using their Windows credentials to IAS on a
Windows Server DC (if you're using AD).
I kinda thought that was the case. Thank you for your help Chr
First. Thanks for making the best rouster software in the world.
Second. I'v searched, but i cant quite figure it out. I would like to
use captive portal. What I want is to have certain users based on
windows username and passwords automatically autenticate without seeing
the captive portal
Block the IP and wait to see who complains that they are disconnected.
Ryan Rodrigue
Office: (985) 876-4096
Fax: (985) 853-0134
-Original Message-
From: Juan Rivera [mailto:jriv...@americancableco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:55 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject
Yep. If you are wanting to use nat, use virtual IP to set up additional
Ip address and then use 1:1 nat to specify which internal IPs you would
like on which external IP addresses. I am not sure, but i think you
must enable advanced outbound nat as well. I hope this helps, Ryan
try to change it to the appropriate city/state. Try america/new york.
-Original Message-
From: k_o_l [mailto:k_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:00 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Clock incorrect
Ryan,
It is set for time Zone "ETC/
is your timezone set to GMT - x or set to a city/state? It should be
city/state. this was an issue a while back too. I don't know if it was
ever solved.
-Original Message-
From: k_o_l [mailto:k_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 9:45 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pf
Fail over works just fine. Just set it up in the loadbalancer pool as
failover, Just put them in the order you want first to last.
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 6:45 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Multi Wan Load
ginal Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 10:02 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PFsense on P4 Hyperthreading
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Ryan Rodrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Will PF sense work w
Will PF sense work with a P4 using hypthreading? I know I can disable it in
the BIOS, but i was just wondering if I could use it. If I can, in the
install, should I tell it I have a single CPU or a multi CPU setup? Thanks
for the help, Ryan
I know there was a thread similar to this, but I started a new message
because I don't feel it is the same.
Is there any way anyone knows of to get a list of who went were on PFsense?
I mainly would like to log traffic per user. If it did a resolution of the
websites name instead of IP, that woul
I have a board on order and will let you know how well it works with
pfsense.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Dick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:02 AM
To: support@pfsense.com; support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Review New Hardware Setup
On Fri, 1
Sorry to butt in to this question, but i think it kinda goes along. Has
anybody tried the new Inet atom based processors for something like this?
They have made a few ITX boards for a pretty cheap price. They even have
intel chipsets.
http://www.malabs.com/product.asp?product_sku=76171&item_no=MB
I use HP Procurve 2626 switches around 350 on ebay most days
From: Nelson Papel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:28 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Wanted: Tips for a VLAN capable switch (for home
use)
A Nortel Baystack 450-24, they are dirt cheap
did you set the nat forwarding?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Todorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 11:31 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] portforward
Hello can somebody help me with port forward with pfsense. I enable port
forward for wan and
great. I knew there was a simple way to do this. Thanks. >Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 5:09 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] System Time
Hey I know the answer to this one!
Go to Command m
uldnt figure out what time it thought
it was so I could figure out what time the logs were really talking about.
I fixed the time issue using NTP, but was just curious in case I ever saw
this in the future. Thanks for your help,
Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:29 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box
On 4/9/08, Ryan Rodrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the cost on these boxes? Does anyone know w
What are the cost on these boxes? Does anyone know where they can be
purchased? Thanks
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 7:38 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] More Ethernet ports on a pfsense box
Depends on how
e information, but I don't know what
> other questions are important. Thanks for your help, Ryan
>
What Curtis pointed you to should work, but you might prefer PPTP
because the client is built into Windows, and it's a heck of a lot
easier to configure. It's much less firewal
Thanks a bunch Curtis. I can test to see if it works , but i have no way of
testing more than a few connections. I at least have a good place to start
now. Thanks again, Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 1:24 PM
To
I think this is what I am looking for. Thanks for the information. Is there
any limitiation to the number of OPENVPN connections I can have in PFsense?
Oh. I changed my display name on my email address from Radio Tech to Ryan
Rodrigue. Sorry, I didn't realise it was setup that way..
and
I think this is what I am looking for. Thanks for the information. Is
there any limitiation to the number of OPENVPN connections I can have in
PFsense?
Oh. I changed my display name on my email address from Radio Tech to Ryan
Rodrigue. Sorry, I didn't realise it was setup tha
Return Receipt
Your Re: AW: [pfSense Support] IPSEC
document:
Return Receipt
Your Re: AW: [pfSense Support] IPSEC
document:
alright. Im stupid. What is FUD?
-Original Message-
From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:34 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2-RC2 beta1 -> 1.2-RC4 upgrade
Please stop spreading FUD (this is the second request).
My firware upgrade worked great. Been up 6 days and 14 hours. Not even
anything resembling a problem here. I haven't read too many problems with
the upgrade. Im sure if there was a real problem, many people would have
posted about it by now. Have faith in the PFsense team. Backup your image
f
Return Receipt
Your RE: [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection
document:
Return Receipt
Your RE: [pfSense Support] Dropped WAN connections
document:
RC4 released!
i did the firmware upgrade with the update, I don't see that it has been
upgraded? How can you see if the upgrade was successful?
Thanks
Sangye
On 17/01/2008, Jeroen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 AM, Ryan Rodrigue < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mai
alright. Im goofy. I guess i just got used to decompressing the image
before burning to cd. And the 7zip works fine for the ISO. thanks, Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:03 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re
At least its not just me. I think i'll get it from my house tonight. I
have cable there. um.. I was trying to get the update, not the full
install. Thanks for your help. Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:
using forefox. i will try IE
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:36 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: [pfSense-discussion] 1.2-RC4 released!
On Jan 16, 2008 5:34 PM, Ryan Rodrigue < [EM
Has anyne downloaded this successfully? I have, but i keep getting an
error. unexpected end of archive. Im using WinRar which has always worked
in the past. I even tried from different mirrors.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 1
Support] PPPOE with static IP
It appears you are on an older version of pfSense. Try upgrading to 1.2rc3
or wait till 1.2rc4 comes out within the next couple of weeks.
Curtis
On Jan 16, 2008 9:27 AM, Ryan Rodrigue < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the replys. First, i corrected the
se Support] PPPOE with static IP
Check out http://blog.pfsense.org. One of the latest posts I believe fixes
your problem.
Curtis
On Jan 15, 2008 3:33 PM, Ryan Rodrigue < <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have a dsl account with a pppoe connection and a stat
uch rather
not have this linksys router on my network. Thanks, Ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return Receipt
Your [pfSense Support] Making a VPN Connection
document:
I am not sure why the LAN has an ip address and is bridged. I am not sure
if this would really work. Are you trying to do nat and have some things
that do not nat? If you are, i would use another interface (if you have
that option). Also, alot of the stupid DSL routers still do filtering.
this
You are correct. My ISP is on crack and that is the problem. I can't fix
them so I was hoping for another soultion. I guess i will just have to
leave it in the mode it is in until i get a better sollution. Thanks
again, Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[
] AA$T PPPOE OUT? What's the world comming
to?
On 12/28/07, Ryan Rodrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright. I am definatly not an expert on this. I was just looking at the
> FreeBSD and found the have a version 5.0r2. I am just trying to help. I
> don't undestan
Alright. I am definatly not an expert on this. I was just looking at the
FreeBSD and found the have a version 5.0r2. I am just trying to help. I
don't undestand why windows would still work though. I figured id do
somethign, even if it was wrong. Thanks, Ryan
http://www.freebsd.or
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] AA$T PPPOE OUT? What's the world comming
to?
On 12/28/07, Ryan Rodrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a pfsence that has been working great for a year and a half. When
I
> got beck wendesday, my pppoe will not connect.
> I have my dslmodem i
pfsense to keep a real public ip address?
Thanks for your help, Ryan
Dec 28 16:36:04 mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP MD5
Dec 28 16:36:04 mpd: MAGICNUM 00ea7190
Dec 28 16:36:04 mpd: MRU 1500
Dec 28 16:36:04 mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP MD5
Dec 28 16:36:04 mpd: MRU 1492
Dec 28 16:36:04 mpd: MAGICNUM b778760b
Dec 28
mind when you are defining the destination address it should be the
PRIVATE IP not the PUBLIC one
If you are getting the correct address on whatismyip then the NAT mapping is
fine. it is firewall rules that are messing you up.
-Tim
From: Ryan Rodrigue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, Dec
I have it setup as Proxy ARP
I went to 1:1 NAT and firewall rules and specified the 73 and 72 as two
seperate entries using the /32 subnet mask
on the WAN interface it is setup as x.x.x.74 /29
I setup a wan rule to allow anything with the destination 192.168.1.10 and
same for 192.168.1.100
I c
entrance from the outside. But that was not the case
> because it is not installed.
>
> So I am in the same boat you are.
>
>
> James Kusler, Information Technology Manager
> PHONE| 509.624.1613 or 800.822.4456 FAX| 509.624.1604
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.sound-tele.com | www
ONE| 509.624.1613 or 800.822.4456 FAX| 509.624.1604
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.sound-tele.com | www.solaxis.com
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Rodrigue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:19 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Virtual Ips
I ha
I have a stupid question.. I am trying to set up 2 servers with a seperate
external IP adresses. My wan IP is x.x.x.74 I want to use x.x.x.73 for
server 1 and x.x.x.72 for server 2. Server 1 is 192.168.1.10 and server 2
is 192.168.1.11. I think i have to set this up in 1:1 nat, Firewall rules,
ule I need.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan L. Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:53 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion (non html)
Sorry about the HTML
From: Ryan L. Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about the HTML
From: Ryan L. Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:52 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Port forward nating confusion
I have what I thought is a simple setup, I am sure I am missing something
please help
WAN
rules) however I have been unable to nat the
address 69.28.70.70 to 192.168.19.3 (https) no matter what I do the connection
times out, is there a prior post dealing with this setup I could be pointed to.
If not I would value the groups assistance
.
Thank you
Ryan
I know this is unsupported however on my own I would like to build and test
this configuration specifically to test vlan support in the vr driver. Has
anyone successfully operated pfSense in this configuration before.
-
To unsub
e do
not support vlan configurations on hardware that isn't listed on the
vlan(4) man page.
--Bill
On 10/10/07, Ryan L. Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I am new to Freebsd in general and pfSense I am using 1.2RC2 embedded on a
> Soekris Net5501, the unit has 4 nics w
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
