Just was reviewing the captive portal implementation.
All the port forwards work great now but I don’t know
where the rules are being kept for the ip’s allowed section.
Checked out rules debug and they are not there???
Where do they live at the moment???
Regards
alan
Hello,
when trying to use the captive portal on 0.79 there is a strange thing.
Following ports work without authentication:
MySQL, smtp, ping, ssh, name. Others I didn´t check.
m0n0wall (1.2b9) doesn´t show this behaviour.
Is this a bug or a feature?
heres my configuration
212.x.x.x
Hi.. how i can disable captive portal in RC1?
sorry for my english.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To un
Hi !
I'm trying to use captive portal on ath0 interface...
WLAN-client gets dhcp-lease and everything bit cannot tonnect to any
network...
If i add the mac-adress to the captive portal it works wothout auth...
But i want auth for this client, so i remove the mac... but there does
not pop up any
Now that I plowed through the VLAN issue. I have
been presented with another config question.
Is there any way to have captive portal active on
multiple interfaces?
I dug through the mail lists and the forum, but it
seems that the answer is a resounding "no". So
naturally the next question is .
If I wanted to display a user's IP address AND MAC address on the
captive portal page, does anyone have a code snippet that would do that
on the pfSense captive portal page? Is this possible?
Basically, I want to make it really easy for someone to call us and have
us provision them for access,
Hi,
I'm running a few (6 at the moment) pfsense 1.2.3-RELEASE boxes on a
rather large scale wireless network, as border routers and firewalls
between the internet uplinks and the rest of the network. (network
background info: +600 subnets, +150 router nodes, 6 internet uplinks,
about 1000 uni
We are wondering if there is any information available that explains in detail
how the Captive Portal on pfsense works? We know it's function, but we are
wondering what is happening behind the scene?
Any documentation would be nice.
Thank you
Dwane
Can you plaese file a ticket?
On 7/11/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Allow ip addresses does not seem to be functioning on 0.68.10 in the captive
> portal
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Da
Hi pfSense,
I'm using m0n0wall and have recently found pfSense by googling and was
wondering if it suffered the same captive portal radius authentication
with per-user bandwidth issues ?
I would like to setup a captive portal with radius authentication, which
m0n0wall or pfSense can do but I
They are kept in pf tables. The table in question is captiveportal.
Try this command at a command prompt after you have some ppl auth'd:
pfctl -t captiveportal -T show
Scott
On 7/29/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Just was reviewing the captive portal implementation.
They are kept in pf tables. The table in question is captiveportal.
Try this command at a command prompt after you have some ppl auth'd:
pfctl -t captiveportal -T show
Scott
Ok the allowed ip addresses are in that table, but what I really wanted
Was the rule that was being applied to the c
On 7/29/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok the allowed ip addresses are in that table, but what I really wanted
> Was the rule that was being applied to the captive portal for allowed ip
> addresses and active clients.
# cat /tmp/rules.debug | grep captiveportal
no rdr on fxp2 proto
On 7/29/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok the allowed ip addresses are in that table, but what I really
wanted
> Was the rule that was being applied to the captive portal for allowed
ip
> addresses and active clients.
# cat /tmp/rules.debug | grep captiveportal
no rdr on fxp2 proto
On 7/29/05, alan walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok thanks it looks ok for allowed IP's, is the rule the same for captive
> portal clients that are being authenticated through the captive portal
> or are they authenticated on there mac address
Yes
Have a couple of rules to
allow access to our webservers in the captive portal.
But when I make a rule to
allow all to this ip address it just returns to the
captive portal
On 8/23/05, Tobias Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when trying to use the captive portal on 0.79 there is a strange thing.
> Following ports work without authentication:
> MySQL, smtp, ping, ssh, name. Others I didn´t check.
> m0n0wall (1.2b9) doesn´t show this behaviour.
> Is this a
I was looking at the setup screen, and it doesn't look like it will
let me pick the OPT1 interface (which is where my guest WLAN will
come in on...)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mai
I cannot reproduce this problem. Can anyone else test? Alan?
Scott
On 8/23/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Tobias Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > when trying to use the captive portal on 0.79 there is a strange thing.
> > Following ports work wit
I noticed this behaviour this morning. https didn't work, http sent
me to the login page, but ping worked (usually) and I could SSH
through the firewall. Oddly, last night after I setup CP, it worked
as intended.
--Bill
On 8/23/05, Tobias Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when tryi
Well, it doesn't seem to work at all. Here's what I'm seeing:
1. I'm allowed to pass whatever traffic I feel like before being
authenticated.
2. When I launch the browser, and see the default pfsense captive
portal page, typing an invalid user or password gives no indication
of an error.
Uhhh...duh, I had a rule on the CP interface that allowed all. That
test box is currently powered off, but I pretty much promise that was
the issue (at least for me). It's too late tonight, long day at work,
but I'll confirm this tomorrow after pulling down the latest firmware
which fixes the red
Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 => Any rule in I
had before. So... I removed it and now access is not allowed until I
go through the portal page. Stil
Yes, but it gives me an error when I do it. Did
someone try it?
--- Gertjan KROEB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Euuuh,
>
> How did you put it ON in the first place ?
> Use that to put it OFF.
>
> More serious: You'll find your answer on the main
> web page -> Services -> Captive Portal :: the fi
Hi,I running a test on pfSense. I've added a single machine to the lan port, connected it, and configured Captive Portal to a 120 minutes hard timeout. sure enough, the user was disconnected. The problem is that the aplication I left running continued to communicate. The application is bittorrent s
Sorry, the previous message was incomplete. Gmail usage inexperience :-(Hi,I running a test on pfSense. I've added a single machine to
the LAN port, and connected a user after configuring Captive Portal to a 120
minutes hard timeout. Sure enough, the user was disconnected after the timeout period.
I have setup 3 PFSense servers (P4-2.4GHZ, 512MB). All 3 run DHCP and give
themselves out as a gateway. We have a small userbase of around 400 broadband
connections. These 3 servers run the user base flawless now and only perform
NAT with no rules. We would like to use captive portal to authenti
On 3/3/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi !
I'm trying to use captive portal on ath0 interface...
WLAN-client gets dhcp-lease and everything bit cannot tonnect to any
network...
If i add the mac-adress to the captive portal it works wothout auth...
But i want auth for this client
Well, yes, it's wpa-2 aes :-)
Best work !!!
I'll check it !!!
Just tell me when, else I'll test it in 2 hours :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. März 2007 20:52
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense S
Just monitor the build dates. You need the next available build from now.
holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. März 2007 21:29
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Well, yes, it's wpa-
Just started monitoring :-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. März 2007 21:39
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Just monitor the build dates. You need the next available build from now.
holger
] Captive Portal
Just monitor the build dates. You need the next available build from now.
holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. März 2007 21:29
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Well, yes
On 3/4/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm, tried the latest snapshot... wpa2 does not seem to work with the captive
portal until now... site cannot be found... :(
Reinstall? The options are definitely back.
# pfsense requires for WPA
add 1100 set 1 pass layer2 mac-type 0x888e
Also, please install a working version and from the shell do a:
ipfw show
Then reinstall the non working version and from a shell do:
ipfw show
Scott
On 3/4/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/4/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm, tried the latest snapshot...
tt Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. März 2007 19:06
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Also, please install a working version and from the shell do a:
ipfw show
Then reinstall the non working version and from a shell do:
ipfw show
Scott
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What should it read on the fresh install ?
It's a productive system... it's hard to reinstall in between...
Right, but it must work, correct? :) If you could get a reading from
a box that works, it would be most helpful.
Scott
I'll try to get a fresh install on the same system as soon as possible...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März 2007 20:52
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin &l
layer2
65535 13855 8308510 allow ip from any to any
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März 2007 21:00
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
I'll try to get a fresh install on the same system as so
2007 21:35
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: AW: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Hi, Scott !
Fresh install shows the following, but does not work also :-(
00030 7882 4784874 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via fxp0 keep-state
00030 1445 1633539 skipto 5 ip from any to any in via fxp2
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Scott !
Fresh install shows the following, but does not work also :-(
[snip]
01100 0 0 allow ip from any to any layer2 mac-type 0x888e
I don't see the traffic counter increasing on this test. Did you
actually test login again
I found a potential issue. Please test a snapshot around two hours from now.
Scott
On 3/5/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Scott !
>
> Fresh install shows the following, but does not work also :-(
[snip]
> 01100 0
: Dienstag, 6. März 2007 01:17
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
I found a potential issue. Please test a snapshot around two hours from now.
Scott
On 3/5/07, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Fuchs, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi,
1. Congratulation to developer that will release a new version of pfsense.
Nice jobs guys!
2. I'm using captive portal for authenticate my wireless user (right now
have about 700 users with approximately 100 cocurrent users), but when i
want to add user i take some memory and time to read
On 5/18/07, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that I plowed through the VLAN issue. I have
been presented with another config question.
Is there any way to have captive portal active on
multiple interfaces?
I dug through the mail lists and the forum, but it
seems that the answer is a
Hi all,
I'm using now pfsense for a few months (old user of monowall) and I wanted
today to activate captive portal.
So I'm using pfsense 1.2 - RC3 with squid, bandwithd, ntop, and all the other
usual ones :p
Problem I got, when wanted to activate captive portal, and seems doesn't work
at all
Hi,
A question about the captive portal. I'm looking for a way to disallow
concurrent user logins. However, most customers will use MAC address
for authentication, so if I disallw concurrent user logins, they can
still access the 'net from the MAC address and give their
username/password t
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
If I wanted to display a user’s IP address AND MAC address on the
captive portal page, does anyone have a code snippet that would do
that on the pfSense captive portal page? Is this possible?
I suggest opening a feature request ticket on cvstrac.pfsense.org,
and/or st
Client IP: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 6:41 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
>
> If I wanted to dis
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
If I made the modifications to display the mac/client IP on the
"default" captive portal page, would you commit it and make it the
default captive portal page? I would just throw a couple of lines right
beneath the login button that say:
Client MAC: xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
: Sunday, March 23, 2008 7:03 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
> If I made the modifications to display the mac/client IP on the
> "default" captive portal page, would you commit it and make it the
> default captive portal
I've been running CP on a 1.2 install for about 6
months now and we now are noticing that there is
no authentication happening.
Thing we've tried:
> Moving the CP to another interface (ie WLAN (WAP
connected ethernet)).
> Starting and restarting the CP service (fails
the webConfigurator when we r
--- Begin Message ---
Hello
Is possible to configure captive portal with ldap authentication?
I have a linksys wrtg54 in my LAN, acting as AP. Is possible to
configure this AP (with the default firmware or DD-wrt/openwrt) to
authenticate to captive portal of pfsense?
Thanks
--- End Messag
We have been running pfSense as a Captive Portal for quite sometime.
Lately, our flenses have had services that were locking up. You could
view items on the GUI, but could not execute a Captive Portal lookup or
a Halt System or Reboot System. And if you ssh'ed into the system, you
could not execu
Hi folks,
I've got a captive portal deployed on a simple LAN/WAN configured
current PFsense box.
All clients that I want to have transparent access to the internet
have a MAC bypass entry.
All other clients authenticate against the active portal.
The mac-bypass has over 300 entries in it.
I ge
Does anyone know where I can find a nice templated captive portal
page. Something with a simple header, ULA and Login. I know it sounds
so simple, but my web skillz are limited...
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
--
Hi,
i use pfsense 2.0 as a captive portal.
Everything works fine except the redirect after user authentication.
I set up captive portal to redirect connections to
http://www.google.it after authentication, but often after giving
username and password correctly the page of the authentication rema
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Hans Maes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a few (6 at the moment) pfsense 1.2.3-RELEASE boxes on a rather
> large scale wireless network, as border routers and firewalls between the
> internet uplinks and the rest of the network. (network background info: +600
> subne
Good afternoon.
I am trying to install pfSense-2.0-BETA4-20100915-0900.iso to just run a
captive portal. I am having issues even getting the captive portal to work.
When I initiate a web page, I should get something requesting authentication.
Instead, I get the web page requested if it is i
Hi Dwane,
in my oppinion, there's not much documentation on that topic available.
But it's working that way:
1. Receives an IP Packet
2. Blocks it until authenticated / Answers with HTML Website if Port 80
is talked to
3. Receives credentials from User
4. Authenticates with internal Databas
Hi,
I was wondering, if it would be possible to log all traffic from a captive
portal point of view ?
When handing out "captive portal" - access keys to users, it's use and
whereabouts should be logged in case of misuse !
Can I log per login on CaptivePortal level to some kind of database ??
Id
I am experiencing an issue again where the Captive Portal is not redirecting
automatically. WE can web into http://pfsense.domain.local:8000 and it will
redirect. However, if we just click on a browser and go to a homepage, it will
not redirect.
I have seen this before and thought I had the
Captive portal Allowed IP
I configured captive portal for not to ask for to password
when having access 1 determined ip address.
any > to > 200.xxx.yyy.zzz
But when I try to have access this address it show the
authentication page standard (that I placed in captive portal) so that
the us
On 7/28/05, James Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi pfSense,
>
> I'm using m0n0wall and have recently found pfSense by googling and was
> wondering if it suffered the same captive portal radius authentication
> with per-user bandwidth issues ?
We do not have this option.
> I would like t
Thanks for the quick reply Scott,
In the features section of the pfsense website it says that a freeradius
is available within pfsense and when looking at the screenshot of this
there are fields for entering a users upload and download bandwidth
limits and so would I be correct in assuming tha
On 7/29/05, James Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply Scott,
>
> In the features section of the pfsense website it says that a freeradius
> is available within pfsense and when looking at the screenshot of this
> there are fields for entering a users upload and download
Hi Scott,
So the bandwidth fields on the freeradius screenshot within the features
section of the website don't actualy work on the captive portal then ?
What I'm actualy after is the capability to have a user log in via the
captive portal and have there bandwidth set to a specific level, cou
On 7/29/05, James Mellor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> So the bandwidth fields on the freeradius screenshot within the features
> section of the website don't actualy work on the captive portal then ?
NO. Your freeradius package is out of date.
> What I'm actualy after is the capa
Thanks Scott,
I think I now have the full picture - captive portal works on pfsense
but doesn't support bandwidth restrictions due to the freeradius server
package being out of date, but it is possible to creat a script to
connect to pfsense via ssh and alter the pf table.
Looks like it's im
I'm not sure what's going on, but every time we enable the Captive Portal in
0.73.6 (and older versions we were trying yesterday), the WebGUI starts to
hang. Just after enabling it (with "Local User Manager" being the only
setting not at the default value), the WebGUI responds and states that the
The interface must be enabled and configured to show up.
Scott
On 8/24/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking at the setup screen, and it doesn't look like it will
> let me pick the OPT1 interface (which is where my guest WLAN will
> come in on...)
>
>
>
> --
At 07:10 PM 8/24/2005, Scott Ullrich wrote:
The interface must be enabled and configured to show up.
Aha, thanks. I was before, but I got bit by that bug you just fixed
in the vlan checking code. Haven't pulled down 0.80 yet. Thx...
Scott
On 8/24/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I have just commited a change for this. Please test on 0.80.4
On 8/25/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, it doesn't seem to work at all. Here's what I'm seeing:
>
> 1. I'm allowed to pass whatever traffic I feel like before being
> authenticated.
>
> 2. When I launc
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
> misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
> until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 => Any rule in I
> had before.
Not a misunderstanding, t
At 07:23 PM 8/26/2005, Chris Buechler wrote:
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
> misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block access
> until you authenticated, so I left the default OPT1 => Any rule i
On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:23 PM 8/26/2005, Chris Buechler wrote:
> >On 8/26/05, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Running latest 80.4. Part of my problem was a basic
> > > misunderstanding. I had assumed that the portal would block a
On 8/26/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, if that's the controls you want applied to authenticated
> clients. Sounds like that's a bug though. Scott or someone will have
> to comment there.
Chris is absolutely correct.
I'll drag all the equipment back out tomorrow and retest
i just try out captive portal.
it's ok when i try open, say, www.google.com
and it's redirected to login page.
but problems occur when i try to open, say, www.google.com/talk
or www.somedomain.com/whatever/after/dot/com
it will give me a 404 error not found.
imho, this will cause confuse for new
I'm having a problem with making changes to the captive portal webgui page. If I attempt to change the idle or hard timeout settings, then hit the save button, I then get a page cannot be displayed. I can disable/enable captive portal without getting that error. I don't see anything obvious in t
I was wondering how difficult it would be to
be able to enter an IP range in captive portal to bypass instead of specifying
IP by IP. Is there a command line way to do it? I have a large /16 block with
only a few hundred IPs located in it, but their scattered around and some cannot
be determ
That is very interesting as IPFW should have cut the conversation off.
I'll look into calling pfctl -k for the ip in question to make sure
that all of the states are removed.
Scott
On 10/20/06, Roberto Greiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, the previous message was incomplete. Gmail usage
Him
I was doing a small test with the captive portal, and noticed a minor
glitch with the setup pages. In the Services/Captive Portal/Allowed IP
Addresses, when clicking to add a new IP, if you simply click save
without adding anything, the error message appears out of place, thrown
to the right s
Hi, anyone has any information how to pass DNS request packet through
captive portal? The problem I faced was that the computers configured
with a DNS server IP address instead of obtaining DNS server IP
dynamically cannot invoke the captive portal.
Regards,
Kelvin
Hi !
I think it might be an error in captive portal:
When changing some entry and then save them, there appear two "apply"
buttons:
http://pfsense.trendchiller.com/pics/cp_apply_error.jpg
Regards, Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
On 5/3/07, Mohd Saidy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
1. Congratulation to developer that will release a new version of pfsense.
Nice jobs guys!
2. I'm using captive portal for authenticate my wireless user (right now
have about 700 users with approximately 100 cocurrent users), but when i
want t
Hi !
Anyone out there using Captive Portal with passthru MAC ?
Because it just does not work form e... when adding a MAC adress it seems as i
fit would be ignored.
When addind the IP it works again.
There does not come up any website asking for username and password... do I
have to add some rule
Hi gang.
I have two pfsense firewalls, fw1 and fw2, 10 VLAN interfaces and CARP
addresses in between. Everything works fine, untill I enable Captive
portal on one of interfaces.
First sign of trouble is, that all CARP interfaces on primary fw (fw1)
goes to backup mode and fw2 becomes master. T
Our campus is using PfSense to control wireless access to our network
via the Captive Portal and becoming very reliant on its operation. I do
not want to necessarily become a developer to have technical
troubleshooting skills. But I would like to have a document that
describes the basics of the C
Try clearing your state table and seeing if that fixes the issue.
Curtis
Just tried, and no changes :(
Yannick
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dimanche 20 janvier 2008 23:47
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal trouble
Try clearing your state table and seeing if that fixes the issue.
Curtis
Did you already try disabling your transparent proxy? What are you using
for your captive portal login page?
Curtis
rg/1999/xhtml";>
Untitled Document
Private Room
Regards
From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 21 janvier 2008 2:20
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal trouble
Did you already try disabling your tra
Hi,
I've seen that microtik has an option of using cookies to authenticate
users (captive portal). Is there something similar in pfsense? I'm
thinking about using the captive portal for auth of subscribers to a
WiFi service, but I'd rather not have them enter their credentials
everytime th
We are currently using 1.2 RC1 on a Dell Power Edge R200 and 1.2 Release
on a Dell Power Edge 860.
In the last couple of weeks, the devices has stopped working for those
who are NOT already connected. If you are connected, you maintain the
capability to gain access. Each time I have gone to t
My apologies that should say "our pfsenses" and not "our flenses"
From: Atkins, Dwane P [mailto:atki...@uthscsa.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:30 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Iss
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel wrote:
> 1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
> what I am seeing expected with 300 entries?
I'm sure someone will chime in with the precise ipfw limitation, but
this is mostly going to be dependent on your system's perform
I was going to ask what hardware you were running this on. We have a
rather large list of MAC addresses in our captive portal and it works
fine. Its a dual opteron/4 gigs of ram. Probably overkill, so it
wont help you know what you need, but if your running 128 ram or even
256, its bare bo
It's a P4 2.something, 40gb disk, 1gb ram.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> I was going to ask what hardware you were running this on. We have a rather
> large list of MAC addresses in our captive portal and it works fine. Its a
> dual opteron/4 gigs of ram. Probably
PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel wrote:
> 1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
> what I am seeing expected with 300 entries?
I'm sure someone will chime in with
, May 07, 2009 3:16 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Captive Portal Question
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel wrote:
>> 1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
>> what I am seeing expected with 300 en
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 22:06, Tim Dressel wrote:
> Finally, I'd appreciate any feedback out there on installs with counts
> on mac bypass entries topping a 1000 count. I am considering tying
> together several of my networks and would like to know what the upper
> end on the captive portal looks l
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
