Craig wrote:
Is there some way to get Java to work with SeaMonkey?
After reading the Release Notes, I can answer my own question:
Linux:
The Java 7 plugin does not work with SeaMonkey (bug 754622).
Craig
___
support-seamonkey mailing
On 08/15/2012 02:26 PM, Craig wrote:
Craig wrote:
Is there some way to get Java to work with SeaMonkey?
After reading the Release Notes, I can answer my own question:
Linux:
The Java 7 plugin does not work with SeaMonkey (bug 754622).
Craig
Yep. However it *does
-javaplugin.so only, whereas SeaMonkey (not the distro version)
does not requires the system java also to be java-6-openjdk.
For example if I set my system jre to 1.7.0_04:
$ java -version
java version 1.7.0_04
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_04-b20)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
version)
does not requires the system java also to be java-6-openjdk.
For example if I set my system jre to 1.7.0_04:
$ java -version
java version 1.7.0_04
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_04-b20)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 23.0-b21, mixed mode, sharing)
And set my mozilla
Craig wrote:
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_22
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
(rhel-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b11, mixed mode)
Which is really odd, since
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Craig wrote:
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_22
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
(rhel-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b11, mixed mode)
Which
On 06/07/2012 12:16 AM, Jens Hatlak wrote:
Craig wrote:
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_22
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6)
(rhel-1.25.1.10.6.el5_8-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build
Jens Hatlak wrote:
chicagofan wrote:
Jens, while you're on the subject of Java... is there any way a [Win7]
SM user to whom all of this is greek, get Java to work on SM 2.8 or
any subsequent version? :)
Java *is* working for *me*, and I'm on Win7 x64, SM 2.10b3 (which is 99.9%
equal to SM
Seeing that Seamonkey 2.10 had been released, I downloaded it and
Firefox 13.0. After I installed both, I started Seamonkey and went to
the page http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/.
At that page, I found my Java was out of date.
I downloaded the new version (jre-7u4-linux-i586.rpm
On 06/06/2012 09:15 PM, Craig wrote:
Seeing that Seamonkey 2.10 had been released, I downloaded it and
Firefox 13.0. After I installed both, I started Seamonkey and went to
the page http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/.
At that page, I found my Java was out of date.
I downloaded
NoOp wrote:
Use openjdk; SeaMonkey doesn't work with java 1.7.x:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622
([linux] Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 does not work in SeaMonkey)
OK. But it seems odd that Firefox does work with java 1.7.x and
Seamonkey does not.
I'll look for openjdk
NoOp wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754622
([linux] Sun Java jre1.7.0_04 does not work in SeaMonkey)
I read the bug, saw the command
$ java -version
so I tried it. My results are,
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_22
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.10.6
NoOp wrote:
On 05/12/2012 10:55 AM, NoOp wrote:
...
Given that it does work with SeaMonkey in Windows (XP and 7), I suspect
that the linux builds may still have a paramater that blocklists Java 7.
Maybe related to the older Mozilla blocklist?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blocked/p85
Hartmut Figge wrote:
David H. Durgee:
I just noticed after reading this thread that somewhere between 2.7.2
and this release that my Java plugin disappeared. I am running on Linux
Mint Katya 11 x64 with the x64 build of 2.9.1 and my installed Java is:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot
GerardJan:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot/ja120513.png (61 KB)
Gentoo, x86_64, SM 2.12a1. But i have java disabled because sometimes it
freezes my SM.
try seamonkey 2.12a1
Hm? I do not understand. We are both using SM 2.12a1. ;)
Hartmut
Hartmut Figge wrote:
David H. Durgee:
I just noticed after reading this thread that somewhere between 2.7.2
and this release that my Java plugin disappeared. I am running on Linux
Mint Katya 11 x64 with the x64 build of 2.9.1 and my installed Java is:
http://www.triffids.de/pub/screenshot
GerardJan:
everything works fine for me with Java version 7, JRE, Beans, and JDK
I am waiting until it is stable on Gentoo.
I am on Fedora 6 semonkey latest version (nighly built)
Latest version... now, that the Build-ID is no longer in the header, it
is difficult to see. *g*
Unless you
On 05/13/2012 06:30 AM, Jim Taylor wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 05/12/2012 10:55 AM, NoOp wrote:
...
Given that it does work with SeaMonkey in Windows (XP and 7), I suspect
that the linux builds may still have a paramater that blocklists Java 7.
Maybe related to the older Mozilla blocklist?
https
On 05/13/2012 04:50 AM, David H. Durgee wrote:
I just noticed after reading this thread that somewhere between 2.7.2
and this release that my Java plugin disappeared. I am running on Linux
Mint Katya 11 x64 with the x64 build of 2.9.1 and my installed Java is:
java -version
java version
NoOp wrote:
Snip.
I have added comment 2 to the bug to show that jave 7_04 does work
with SeaMonkey 2.9.1 on Windows so it's not a universal problem across
all platforms.
Jim
This thread, and the bug report stated that: 1) the bug is linux only
(Windows SM 2.9.1 versions + Java 7_4
On 05/13/2012 12:35 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
This thread, and the bug report stated that: 1) the bug is linux only
(Windows SM 2.9.1 versions + Java 7_4: WinXP Win7 all work fine.,
and 2) Platform: x86 Linux. But thanks for checking anyway :-)
Sorry I missed where you said
On 05/12/2012 05:24 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 05/08/2012 06:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko
sun java jre1.7.0_04 installed and
set as the default java? Again, in Firefox it works fine, in SeaMonkey
(even with a clean test profile) it does not. *And* with the default
profile prefbar 6.1 installed, prefbar declares No Java Plugin
found!. I suspect it may be a path problem as the same
On 05/08/2012 06:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Mozilla/5.0 (X11
NoOp wrote:
On 05/08/2012 06:55 PM, NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Mozilla/5.0
NoOp wrote:
On 05/08/2012 07:17 PM, GerardJan wrote:
GerardJan wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
...
Anyone else experiencing the same
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox
NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko
GerardJan wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686
On 05/08/2012 07:17 PM, GerardJan wrote:
GerardJan wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java
1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on
the same systems with:
...
Anyone else experiencing the same/similar
http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?jre_version=1.7.0_04vendor=Oracle+Corporationos=Windows+7os_version=6.1
--
Cl Rumania 26
03503 Benidorm (ALC)
Spain
http://ciudadpatricia.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
GerardJan wrote:
http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?jre_version=1.7.0_04vendor=Oracle+Corporationos=Windows+7os_version=6.1
Ich habe es nie gewusst... hahaha
--
~Vink
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
he Java plugins (Deployment Tool Kit Platform) for version 60.290.11 have been
disabled due to security issues and version 60.310.5 has has been installed.
Plugins for 60.290.11 still show when viewing Tools/Add-ons Manager and are
shown as 'Disabled'.
What is the process for deleting the old
On 4/6/2012 1:39 PM David E. Ross submitted the following:
On 4/6/12 8:28 AM, W3BNR wrote:
he Java plugins (Deployment Tool Kit Platform) for version 60.290.11 have
been
disabled due to security issues and version 60.310.5 has has been installed.
Plugins for 60.290.11 still show when
:
http://community.f-secure.com/t5/Protection/Question-about-OS-X-Flashback-K-trojan/m-p/10815#M2205
...
Gotta love it... Apple is just now getting around to updating java to
release 31:
https://support.apple.com/kb/HT5228
quote
Description: Multiple vulnerabilities exist in Java 1.6.0_29
Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible (it
was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31. Things seem
to work properly.
T His morning, when I started my system (XP Professional), I got this
message:
Additional plugins are required to display all
flyguy wrote:
Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible
(it was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31.
Things seem to work properly.
T His morning, when I started my system (XP Professional), I got this
message:
Additional plugins are required
On 4/4/2012 9:27 AM, Jim Taylor wrote:
flyguy wrote:
Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible
(it was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31.
Things seem to work properly.
T His morning, when I started my system (XP Professional), I got this
message
flyguy wrote:
SM did not show Java installed, even though add/remove programs did.
The URL is
http://rldtowercam.viewnetcam.com:5/CgiStart?page=SingleLanguage=0
It's not offering to install a plugin now that I've reinstalled ver 31,
and my add-on manager now shows the plugins you have
flyguy wrote:
On 4/4/2012 9:27 AM, Jim Taylor wrote:
flyguy wrote:
Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible
(it was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31.
Things seem to work properly.
T His morning, when I started my system (XP Professional), I
On 4/4/2012 11:37 AM, Jim Taylor wrote:
flyguy wrote:
On 4/4/2012 9:27 AM, Jim Taylor wrote:
flyguy wrote:
Two or three days ago, SM 2.8 said my Java plugin was not compatible
(it was version 16 or so from last year), so I installed ver 31.
Things seem to work properly.
T His morning, when I
On 04/04/2012 11:19 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
flyguy wrote:
SM did not show Java installed, even though add/remove programs did.
The URL is
http://rldtowercam.viewnetcam.com:5/CgiStart?page=SingleLanguage=0
It's not offering to install a plugin now that I've reinstalled ver 31
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:30:49 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
So let me get this correct: you ask in the other post So do I or don't
I have Java enabled?, I provide you with information to verify: 1)
that you have java enabled (or not), and 2) which version of Java you
have
On 2/24/12 8:41 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I just wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Seems your Java is a bit out of date. Even linux has:
Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_31
File: /opt/java/32/jre1.6.0_31/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
Version:
As out of date goes, the difference between 1.6.0_30 and 1.6.0_31
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/24/12 8:41 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I just wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Seems your Java is a bit out of date. Even linux has:
Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_31
File: /opt/java/32/jre1.6.0_31/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
Version:
As out of date goes, the difference between 1.6.0_30
On 02/24/2012 08:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 02/24/2012 05:09 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Tom Stoudt wrote:
This is the clock page that uses Java:
http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java
When Java is turned off it lets you know.
The other one listed above
NoOp wrote:
So let me get this correct: you ask in the other post So do I or don't
I have Java enabled?, I provide you with information to verify: 1)
that you have java enabled (or not), and 2) which version of Java you
have enabled. You then come back with dick swinging 'BFD' remark (were
you
On Thu 23 Feb 2012 01:33:41pm EDT, /WLS/ said in
mozilla.support.seamonkey:
On 02/23/2012 01:20 PM, Not@home wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Not@home wrote:
My security program (F-Secure) issues a newsletter and
in the latest edition they recommend that we delete Java
if we
Tom Stoudt wrote:
This is the clock page that uses Java:
http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java
When Java is turned off it lets you know.
The other one listed above is only a time snapshot.
OK, here's the error I get:
Java Plug-in 1.6.0_30
Using JRE version 1.6.0_30-b12 Java
On 02/24/2012 05:09 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Tom Stoudt wrote:
This is the clock page that uses Java:
http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java
When Java is turned off it lets you know.
The other one listed above is only a time snapshot.
OK, here's the error I get:
Java
NoOp wrote:
On 02/24/2012 05:09 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Tom Stoudt wrote:
This is the clock page that uses Java:
http://www.time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5/java
When Java is turned off it lets you know.
The other one listed above is only a time snapshot.
OK, here's the error I get
I just wrote:
NoOp wrote:
Seems your Java is a bit out of date. Even linux has:
Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_31
File: /opt/java/32/jre1.6.0_31/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
Version:
As out of date goes, the difference between 1.6.0_30 and 1.6.0_31 is
pretty minor. What am I, a week behind? My Java console
My security program (F-Secure) issues a newsletter and in the latest
edition they recommend that we delete Java if we don't need it, because
is seems to be most vulnerable to every new exploitation. see
http://safeandsavvy.f-secure.com/2012/01/14/why-you-should-get-rid-of-java-now/?ecid
Not@home wrote:
My security program (F-Secure) issues a newsletter and in the latest
edition they recommend that we delete Java if we don't need it, because
is seems to be most vulnerable to every new exploitation. see
http://safeandsavvy.f-secure.com/2012/01/14/why-you-should-get-rid
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Not@home wrote:
My security program (F-Secure) issues a newsletter and in the latest
edition they recommend that we delete Java if we don't need it, because
is seems to be most vulnerable to every new exploitation. see
http://safeandsavvy.f-secure.com/2012/01
On 02/23/2012 01:20 PM, Not@home wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Not@home wrote:
My security program (F-Secure) issues a newsletter and in the latest
edition they recommend that we delete Java if we don't need it, because
is seems to be most vulnerable to every new exploitation
Not@home wrote:
You can see a safe Java applet here. If your Java is enabled, the time
display will tick-tock away; otherwise it's a static display:
http://time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5
I have Java installed, and SM confirms in about:plugins, and so does the
Java Control Panel, which
On 02/23/2012 02:20 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Not@home wrote:
You can see a safe Java applet here. If your Java is enabled, the time
display will tick-tock away; otherwise it's a static display:
http://time.gov/timezone.cgi?Eastern/d/-5
I have Java installed, and SM confirms
Interviewed by CNN on 23/02/2012 14:05, Beauregard T. Shagnasty told the
world:
So the answer is: unless you know of a specific web site(s) that actually
do use Java applets, you can safely remove it - or at least disable it,
possibly via the use of the PrefBar extension (also makes it easy
On 02/23/2012 01:00 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 23/02/2012 14:05, Beauregard T. Shagnasty told the
world:
So the answer is: unless you know of a specific web site(s) that actually
do use Java applets, you can safely remove it - or at least disable it,
possibly via the use
M wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
No. Neither Java nor JavaScript can be enabled for mail or news
messages. For feeds however, which can be handled by the Mail
Newsgroups component of the suite, the same preferences apply
Jens Hatlak wrote:
M wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
No. Neither Java nor JavaScript can be enabled for mail or news messages. For feeds
however, which can be handled by the Mail Newsgroups component of the suite,
the same
preferences
M wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
M wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
No. Neither Java nor JavaScript can be enabled for mail or news
messages. For feeds however, which can be handled by the Mail
Newsgroups component of the suite, the same
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
Margaret
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Interviewed by CNN on 07/02/2012 00:31, M told the world:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
What for? The whole concept of having an executable running directly
from an e-mail (without having to save it first or such) has long been
considered
M wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
Margaret
IIRC, java was banned in 2x editions of SM mail and NG.
Not coded for it.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
M wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
Do you mean Java ... or JavaScript? Those two things are completely
different except for the first four letters of their names.
(and I'd suggest you do not activate either of them for email
On 2/6/12 6:31 PM, M wrote:
SeaMonkey 2.7
Mac OS
Is there any way I can enable Java in Mail and Newsgroups.
Margaret
Enabling any executable in an E-mail message is how viruses and other
malware spread.
--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/.
Anyone who thinks government owns
I received 1 st a
href=http://goodfinance-blog.com/topics/credit-loans;credit loans/a when I
was 25 and it supported me very much. Nevertheless, I need the bank loan once
again.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
I am certain that I read on this list that w.e.f. from some
unknown version of Seamonkey, Java will be disabled (or
removed, or whatever). I can, unfortunately, find
no subject line with Java that refers. I would be
very grateful if someone could point me at the announcement,
and also advise
On 10/22/11 3:18 AM, Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I am certain that I read on this list that w.e.f. from some
unknown version of Seamonkey, Java will be disabled (or
removed, or whatever). I can, unfortunately, find
no subject line with Java that refers. I would be
very grateful
Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:54:57 -0400, /Stan/:
(Using 2.3.3).
When I use Tools/Add-ons Manager/Plugins and click on Check to see
if your plugins are up to date.
it tells me I have Java Script disabled. I have it enabled under
Preferences/Advanced/Scripts Plugins
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:54:57 -0400, /Stan/:
(Using 2.3.3).
When I use Tools/Add-ons Manager/Plugins and click on Check to see
if your plugins are up to date.
it tells me I have Java Script disabled. I have it enabled under
Preferences
(Using 2.3.3).
When I use Tools/Add-ons Manager/Plugins and click on Check to see if
your plugins are up to date. it
tells me I have Java Script disabled. I have it enabled under
Preferences/Advanced/Scripts Plugins.
Must be something else I can do
David E. Ross sent me the following::
On 8/11/11 3:59 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I notice after updating my Java install that it makes no difference in
SM 2.2 (XP SP3) whether Preferences - Advanced/Enable Java is ticked or
not. It's now always active.
This pref
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:45:55 -0700, in message
z6odnxp3yfkoatjtnz2dnuvz_qwdn...@mozilla.org
sean nathan bean wrote:
so where/how does one install java in seamonkey 2.2 on a linux box?
See these instructions
1) http://plugindoc.mozdev.org/linux.html#Java
2) http://kb.mozillazine.org/Java
cmcadams wrote:
I notice after updating my Java install that it makes no difference in
SM 2.2 (XP SP3) whether Preferences - Advanced/Enable Java is ticked or
not. It's now always active.
This pref has been removed from SM 2.3. Java is now solely controlled
from the Add-ons Manager.
HTH
Jens Hatlak wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I notice after updating my Java install that it makes no difference in
SM 2.2 (XP SP3) whether Preferences - Advanced/Enable Java is ticked or
not. It's now always active.
This pref has been removed from SM 2.3. Java is now solely controlled from the
Add-ons
On 8/11/11 3:59 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
cmcadams wrote:
I notice after updating my Java install that it makes no difference in
SM 2.2 (XP SP3) whether Preferences - Advanced/Enable Java is ticked or
not. It's now always active.
This pref has been removed from SM 2.3. Java
NoOp wrote:
On 07/20/2011 11:23 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I tracked it back to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506985
[Bug 506985 - remove java-specific preferences from Firefox UI, hidden
prefs ]
Looks like the option to disable/enable java was removed
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/20/11 4:54 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 07/20/2011 11:23 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I tracked it back to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506985
[Bug 506985 - remove java-specific preferences from Firefox UI, hidden
prefs ]
Looks like
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/19/11 3:18 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced
On 07/20/2011 10:15 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
...
See problem #672665 in Bugzilla.
Dick
Thanks. I added it to my watch list.
Problem #672665 has been marked Closed Duplicate because it duplicates
#512378. Apparently, some 2.x update of SM removed Java-specific
NoOp wrote:
On 07/20/2011 10:15 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
...
See problem #672665 in Bugzilla.
Dick
Thanks. I added it to my watch list.
Problem #672665 has been marked Closed Duplicate because it duplicates
#512378. Apparently, some 2.x update of SM removed Java
On 07/20/2011 11:23 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I tracked it back to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506985
[Bug 506985 - remove java-specific preferences from Firefox UI, hidden
prefs ]
Looks like the option to disable/enable java was removed in Firefox 3.6
On 7/20/11 4:54 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 07/20/2011 11:23 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
...
I tracked it back to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506985
[Bug 506985 - remove java-specific preferences from Firefox UI, hidden
prefs ]
Looks like the option to disable/enable
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point of the Preferences checkbox?
Dick
I can enable
On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal
On 7/19/11 3:18 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/19/11 10:10 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point of the Preferences checkbox?
Dick
___
support-seamonkey mailing
On 7/17/11 2:37 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
Running SM 2.2 on a Windows/XP SP3 system, I can't Enable/Disable Java
through the Preferences-Advanced checkbox but can through the Add-ons
Manager. Not a big deal but what's the point of the Preferences checkbox?
Dick
I can enable and disable Java
I get
message: You either do not have Java enabled or you have an
out-of-date version
of Java installed. Please install the latest version from Java.com
and try again.
It worked fine with SM2.0.14
Works without the Java message in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0)
Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0
either do not have Java enabled or you have an out-of-date version
of Java installed. Please install the latest version from Java.com and try
again.
It worked fine with SM2.0.14
Works without the Java message in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0)
Gecko/20110706 Firefox/5.0 SeaMonkey/2.2 with Java
current version of Java. It is puzzling that it
worked fine with 2.0.14 but not with recently installed 2.2.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/12/11 11:34 AM, William Greenwood wrote:
Thank you for your clear instructions, which I followed completely, but
I still cannot get the page to work. Can you
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/12/11 4:40 PM, William Greenwood wrote:
Yes, I am using a MAC and have confirmed through Software Update that I
am using the most current version of Java. It is puzzling that it
worked fine with 2.0.14 but not with recently installed 2.2.
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7
NoOp wrote:
On 07/12/2011 04:41 PM, William Greenwood wrote:
Following instructions for Mac users at java.com , I have confirmed
through Software Update that I am using the most current version of
Java. It is puzzling that it worked fine with 2.0.14 but not with
recently installed 2.2
NoOp wrote:
On 07/13/2011 07:10 AM, William Greenwood wrote:
...
I just discovered another mystery: when I go to javatester.org with
Seamonkey 2.2 to test my java version it says it is disabled on my
browser, even though all the Seamonkey preference settings indicate
otherwise. When I run
On 07/13/2011 03:11 PM, William Greenwood wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 07/13/2011 07:10 AM, William Greenwood wrote:
...
I just discovered another mystery: when I go to javatester.org with
Seamonkey 2.2 to test my java version it says it is disabled on my
browser, even though all the Seamonkey
On 7/13/11 4:22 PM, William Greenwood wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/13/11 5:33 AM, William Greenwood wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 7/12/11 4:40 PM, William Greenwood wrote:
Yes, I am using a MAC and have confirmed through Software Update that I
am using the most current version of Java
301 - 400 of 515 matches
Mail list logo
