On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:59:30AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Thanks for the response. I couldn't actually find the struct you
> > mentioned in 2.6.18-rc3 (I even grepped through the whole tree and
> > didn't find it - I am using Jason's patched but I don't think it
> > removed this).
Hi!
> Thanks for the response. I couldn't actually find the struct you
> mentioned in 2.6.18-rc3 (I even grepped through the whole tree and
> didn't find it - I am using Jason's patched but I don't think it
> removed this). Is in the -mm2 code? I don't think it matters too
> much because using
Hi Pavel,
Thanks for the response. I couldn't actually find the struct you
mentioned in 2.6.18-rc3 (I even grepped through the whole tree and
didn't find it - I am using Jason's patched but I don't think it
removed this). Is in the -mm2 code? I don't think it matters too
much because using s2ra
Hi!
> >>I also notice that when I suspend to ram if I stare at the screen from
> >>different angles I can still see some faint characters in the
> >>background which makes me think that at some level the screen is not
> >>completley off.
> >
> >Backlight off but screen is not. Yep,
Hi!
> So, might this general IDE fix solve my problem? I compiled
> 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 and tried 's2ram -f' but it just crashed while
> suspending so I couldn't test this. Will this patch eventually get
> merged into the next release (i.e. 2.6.19)? Jason if you want this
> tested more I can try it
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 11:55:09AM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> piix9092 0 [permanent]
> ide_core 115900 3 ide_cd,piix,ide_disk
>
> Your patch was at the more general level of the ide drivers so do you
> have any idea why it didn't work on this particular drive
On Friday 11 August 2006 12:12, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:34:23AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > There have not been any comments except for the Pavel's one, so I gather
> > I can put this into the CVS?
>
> Yes. We can still fine-tune it later, if somebody should
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:34:23AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> There have not been any comments except for the Pavel's one, so I gather
> I can put this into the CVS?
Yes. We can still fine-tune it later, if somebody should find problems.
Now that i am running a pretty recent kernel, i will
On Monday 31 July 2006 08:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have invented an installation procedure for SUSE 10.1 that allows the user
> to
> integrate s2disk (s2both) with powersaved and put the resume binary into the
> initramfs image created by mkinitrd.
>
> The instruction is appended
ICH4-M I think? 'lspci' says
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801DBM (ICH4-M) IDE
Controller (rev 03)
While 'dmesg' also claims:
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx
ICH4: IDE controller at
> AFAICT, the situation with drivers/ide is that it happens to work (by
> luck) well enough for most people that it's been ignored until now. And
> when it doesn't work, the result is a hard, difficult-to-debug hang on
> resume that is rarely diagnosed because the standard
> try-it-with-all-module
Hi Pavel (and others),
On 8/9/06, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I also notice that when I suspend to ram if I stare at the screen from
> >different angles I can still see some faint characters in the
> >background which makes me think that at some level the screen is not
>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:54:19AM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> Is this a similar problem to what you were having on your laptop
> before the patch? Would you expect your patch to work for me or do
> you think its an unrelated problem? Whatever it is I definately have
> an issue with the disk t
Sorry to say that it doesn't seem to help much on my laptop. I
installed 2.6.18-rc3 with your patch (I even checked the code to see
that the patch got implemented) and tried s2ram from the console and
suspend still took noticably long. Moreover, when I got back a prompt
I tried and 'ls' and the m
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 22:38, Jason Lunz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:12:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
]--snip--[
>
> I think Benjamin's may be describing my hardware. My current patch is
> calling hwif->tuneproc(), which resets both controller and drives
> afaict. I plan on co
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 10:12:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> AFAIK, the AHCI suspend to RAM support is on its way, but does anyone know
> about the other SATA/PATA drivers?
AFAICT, the situation with drivers/ide is that it happens to work (by
luck) well enough for most people that it's bee
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 15:15, Jason Lunz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The fix was for AMD/NVidia IDE, but Alan vetoed it on the basis that it
> > should
> > be done at the general level. Everyone agreed, but I don't know if anyone
> > took c
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 18:27, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> So, might this general IDE fix solve my problem? I compiled
> 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 and tried 's2ram -f' but it just crashed while
> suspending so I couldn't test this.
There is a general suspend failure related to the block IO in -rc3-mm2.
I'm
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:27:13PM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> So, might this general IDE fix solve my problem? I compiled
> 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 and tried 's2ram -f' but it just crashed while
> suspending so I couldn't test this.
Maybe. Which ide driver are you using? There's plenty of other stuff
So, might this general IDE fix solve my problem? I compiled
2.6.18-rc3-mm2 and tried 's2ram -f' but it just crashed while
suspending so I couldn't test this. Will this patch eventually get
merged into the next release (i.e. 2.6.19)? Jason if you want this
tested more I can try it but the -mm2 is
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The fix was for AMD/NVidia IDE, but Alan vetoed it on the basis that it should
> be done at the general level. Everyone agreed, but I don't know if anyone
> took care of that. Jason?
I redid the patch at the general IDE level.
Hi,
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 13:23, Pavel Machek wrote:
]--snip--[
>
> Yes, so it is definitely harddrive. You probably should add all
> details to bugzilla.kernel.org, and then ask the IDE maintainers.
>
> Ouch and I think there were patches fixing that, not yet in
> mainline...
Well, I'm n
Hi!
> I think you're right Stefan, this is very possibly a hard disk timeout
> issue because even after suspend wakes up I can run a few commands,
> even accessing the hard disk, but then after another few seconds if I
> try to access the hard-disk the command will block (the machine does
> not fr
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 12:31, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Should the patch you gave me work against a normal 2.6.18-rc3 tree?
> The patch command is telling me it can't find the file to patch at
> input line 9 (which does not seem to point to a file). Sorry if I'm
> being dense bu
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:40:19PM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think you're right Stefan, this is very possibly a hard disk timeout
> issue because even after suspend wakes up I can run a few commands,
> even accessing the hard disk, but then after another few seconds if I
> try to ac
Hi,
I think you're right Stefan, this is very possibly a hard disk timeout
issue because even after suspend wakes up I can run a few commands,
even accessing the hard disk, but then after another few seconds if I
try to access the hard-disk the command will block (the machine does
not freeze, just
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 11:30:50AM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Again, thanks for all the input. Stefan my machine is new. I bought it less
> than two years ago and it was a very expensive laptop ;-> Its a Sony A190
> (the ones with the giant screens that are completely unportable
Hi Rafael,
Should the patch you gave me work against a normal 2.6.18-rc3 tree?
The patch command is telling me it can't find the file to patch at
input line 9 (which does not seem to point to a file). Sorry if I'm
being dense but I don't know the expected syntax of the patch file. I
ran 'patch -
Hi!
Please no html posts.
>I don't really know how powersave is setup but I presume if I just
>call s2ram manually from the console that this does not run any
>scripts or anything on resume right? But when I try s2ram manually it
>still takes ~30 seconds to get me back to X windo
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 11:30, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Again, thanks for all the input. Stefan my machine is new. I bought it less
> than two years ago and it was a very expensive laptop ;-> Its a Sony A190
> (the ones with the giant screens that are completely unportable) and i
Hi Guys,Again, thanks for all the input. Stefan my machine is new. I bought it less than two years ago and it was a very expensive laptop ;-> Its a Sony A190 (the ones with the giant screens that are completely unportable) and in Windows resume is pretty fast (its been a while since i tested it b
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:47:18AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2006-08-09 08:50:07, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > I think this highly depends on the specific machine's BIOS.
> > I have machines here that resume in less than 2 seconds and others that
> > take 20 seconds and more.
>
> Whi
On Wed 2006-08-09 08:50:07, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:07:49PM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
>
> > to work at all (which I'll try to debug). I even used the new version of
> > suspend downloaded from sourceforge (which doesn't go through powersave) and
> > it stil
Hi!
>Thanks for the response. Does it matter that its 2.6.18-rc4 and not
>2.6.18-rc3? I compiled rc3 a while ago and just tried it out and
>didn't get a significant improvment. Specifically, suspending to ram
>using powersave still takes about 30 seconds to resume and suspending
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:07:49PM +0200, Sheer El-Showk wrote:
> to work at all (which I'll try to debug). I even used the new version of
> suspend downloaded from sourceforge (which doesn't go through powersave) and
> it still takes ~30 seconds to come back to life. Should I be expecting
Hi Pavel,Thanks for the response. Does it matter that its 2.6.18-rc4 and not 2.6.18-rc3? I compiled rc3 a while ago and just tried it out and didn't get a significant improvment. Specifically, suspending to ram using powersave still takes about 30 seconds to resume and suspending to disk doesn't
Hi!
>I'm using the stock suspend with SLED 10 (which seems to be almost the
>same RPM as in Suse 10.1 - suspend-20060406-9.8).
>S2RAM reports the following on my machine:
>This machine can be identified by:
>sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation"
>sys_product = "VGN-A19
Hi,I'm using the stock suspend with SLED 10 (which seems to be almost the same RPM as in Suse 10.1 - suspend-20060406-9.8). S2RAM reports the following on my machine:This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation" sys_product = "VGN-A190(UC)" sys_version = "C0003EL
Hi!
> I have invented an installation procedure for SUSE 10.1 that allows the user
> to
> integrate s2disk (s2both) with powersaved and put the resume binary into the
> initramfs image created by mkinitrd.
>
> The instruction is appended and the scritpt and patches referred to in it are
> attach
Hi,
I have invented an installation procedure for SUSE 10.1 that allows the user to
integrate s2disk (s2both) with powersaved and put the resume binary into the
initramfs image created by mkinitrd.
The instruction is appended and the scritpt and patches referred to in it are
attached. Some file
40 matches
Mail list logo
