On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 22:41 +, Jon Burgess wrote:
I have switch the Mapnik layer over to use the new coastline shapefiles
for zooms 10-18. These files are generated by extracting all the OSM
ways with natural=coastline.
In most places these shapefiles are far better then what we had
- Original Message -
From: Keith Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] New Coastline in Mapnik - Glasgow cIty center issue
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 22:41 +, Jon Burgess wrote:
I have switch the Mapnik
The proposed tag waterway = river,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers , has
been at proposal stage for over 18 months, which seems far too long for a
tag which represents such an important feature.
The main problem area seems to be that some people do not
On Feb 8, 2008 11:09 AM, Artem Pavlenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can make osm2pgsql or coastline tools to create polygons, but why
not create them in the first place ?
Can someone enlighten me, please ?
If I wanted to draw the rivers as light blue* with dark blue
riverbanks, wouldn't
Hi,
I found the way term 'Multipolygon' is used in OSM context is
confusing.
True. What we had been looking for was a term for polygons with
holes; it seemed unreasonable to create a relation type=polygon as
plain polygons, without holes, don't require relations. But
multipolygon is
On 8 Feb 2008, at 11:27, David Earl wrote:
You could do it as a relation.
The river bank would be a set of ways (each of which shares its end
nodes with the ends of one of the others), and you could have a
role for the one or two ways which close the loop which says this
is
Artem Pavlenko wrote:
Sent: 08 February 2008 11:42 AM
To: talk Openstreetmap
Cc: OSM-Dev Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-dev] Polygons and Multipolygons
Hello,
I found the way term 'Multipolygon' is used in OSM context is confusing.
Here are ISO 19125-1 definitions :
1. Polygon
A Polygon is a
- Original Message -
From: Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in
Particular
On Feb 8, 2008 11:39 AM, David
On 8 Feb 2008, at 11:26, Andy Allan wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 11:09 AM, Artem Pavlenko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We can make osm2pgsql or coastline tools to create polygons, but why
not create them in the first place ?
Can someone enlighten me, please ?
If I wanted to draw the rivers as
On Feb 8, 2008 11:39 AM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem area seems to be that some people do not like the current
proposal whereby a river is divided up in to separate closed areas. The
reason being that the segment crossing the river to close the area marks a
boundary
On 8 Feb 2008, at 10:39, David Groom wrote:
The proposed tag waterway = river,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/
Large_rivers , has
been at proposal stage for over 18 months, which seems far too long
for a
tag which represents such an important feature.
The
David Groom wrote:
Sent: 08 February 2008 10:40 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in Particular
The proposed tag waterway = river,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Large_rivers ,
has
been at proposal stage for over
Hello all,
In case anyone else finds it useful...
I've knocked up a short webform that enables you to upload tracklogs
to OSM in other formats than GPX. It does the conversion for you,
then uploads the resulting GPX file. It might be useful if, say, you
have a NaviGPS and have copied the
On 08/02/2008 16:43, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
-- -- -- -- -- highway = service
Tree Tree Tree Tree amenity = park
err... leisure=park
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
On 08/02/2008 16:12, bvh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +, David Earl wrote:
On 08/02/2008 16:43, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
-- -- -- -- -- highway = service
Tree Tree Tree Tree amenity = park
err... leisure=park
err... is a line of trees a park?
A bigger question.
I
El Viernes, 8 de Febrero de 2008, wiseLYNX escribió:
bvh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +, David Earl wrote:
On 08/02/2008 16:43, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
-- -- -- -- -- highway = service
Tree Tree Tree Tree amenity = park
err... leisure=park
err... is a line
El Viernes, 8 de Febrero de 2008, wiseLYNX escribió:
-- -- -- -- --
Tree Tree Tree Tree
- -
- -
Tree Tree Tree Tree
-- -- -- -- --
Any suggestion about how to render all this? Even an example of an
already done similar object could be useful.
Make one way per
El Viernes, 8 de Febrero de 2008, wiseLYNX escribió:
can someone have a look at Corso Massimo d'Azeglio?
Coordinates?
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description:
- Original Message -
From: Artem Pavlenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED]; talk Openstreetmap
talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Large Rivers in general, mapnik rendering in
Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gervase Markham wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
| It's been proposed by me several times in the past. I think it's
| essential. I don't know of a similar major project that doesn't do some
| kind of
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +, David Earl wrote:
On 08/02/2008 16:43, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
-- -- -- -- -- highway = service
Tree Tree Tree Tree amenity = park
err... leisure=park
err... is a line of trees a park?
cu bart
___
Hi everybody,
my quest to map Torino continues, and yesterday I was gratified by
seeing the first update of the rendered map containing my work.
I have a question though. Torino is full of wonderful wide avenues, with
a central two way lane, and two one way lane on the sides. something
like this
On 8 Feb 2008, at 12:05, David Earl wrote:
On 08/02/2008 11:54, David Groom wrote:
You mean like
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Rivers,
which
would be my ideal,
Ah, yes.
I was suggesting putting in the connections across the river as well,
but there isn't
You could do it as a relation.
The river bank would be a set of ways (each of which shares its end
nodes with the ends of one of the others), and you could have a role for
the one or two ways which close the loop which says this is structural,
not really part of the river bank. The renderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gervase Markham wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
| It's been proposed by me several times in the past. I think it's
| essential. I don't know of a similar major project that doesn't do some
| kind of assignment. Wikipedia is the nearest, but
hoe wil je dit gaan sorteren.. b/r-tree ? geef eens een hint
ondertussen ga ik xpath eens pesten
Groeten
Rob
Op 07-02-08 heeft Steven te Brinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] het
volgende geschreven:
Hallo,
XPath is wel heel krachtig, maar niet heel snel. Ik denk dus dat het
gebruik van een gesorteerde
volgens mij moet er nog een
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=UTF-8/
in de pagina..
Op 08-02-08 heeft Martijn van Exel [EMAIL PROTECTED] het volgende
geschreven:
maar zie dat er
iets misgaat met de interpretatie van speciale karakters, zie voor een
voorbeeld
Coördinaten zijn niet makkelijk de sorteren, omdat ze 2-dimensionaal
zijn. Hiermee heb ik ook niet zo veel ervaring. maar ik heb eens
nagedacht wat volgens mij een aardig algoritme is. Ik zal beschrijven
hoe ik het zou implementeren:
Stel we hebben een aantal punten P die niet in OSM zitten.
dat ziet er veelbelovend uit !
eerste stap richting een door leken te bedienen webbased editor
Op 08-02-08 heeft Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] het volgende
geschreven:
Ik heb een beetje zitten spelen met een systeem was mensen zelf de
namen op zouden kunnen geven.
Martijn,
Wat gaaf!
Ik heb nu geen tijd om er uitgebreid naar te kijken, maar zie dat er
iets misgaat met de interpretatie van speciale karakters, zie voor een
voorbeeld http://www.mvexel.dds.nl/schaaltreinen/ZZ485A9319.jpg
Nogmaals, UITERMATE cool!!!
--
martijn van exel -+- [EMAIL
Ik heb een beetje zitten spelen met een systeem was mensen zelf de
namen op zouden kunnen geven.
http://tile.openstreetmap.nl/pois.html
Nog wat werk aan de winkel, maar het lijkt al ergens op...
Mvg,
2008/2/7 Joris Meijerink [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ik heb van http://www.plezierkapel.nl,
Ze zijn hun markt ook aan het vergroten.
http://life.tweakers.net/nieuws/51771/tele-atlas-introduceert-gps-kaarten-voor-voetgangers.html
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
Hallo,
das neue Worldfile steht wieder zum Download zur Verfügung.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/User:Computerteddy
--
Viele Gruesse
Computerteddy
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
Sollte ja mit cGPSmapper gehen. Die Version, die das kann, kostet
aber 2800 USD. Vielleicht kann man sich ja zusammen tun. Vielleicht
könnte die OSM Foundation eine Lizenz besorgen und die Karten dann
für Mitglieder anbieten? Andererseits fördert das natürlich nicht
gerade das Entstehen
Christoph Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Entweder soll Garmin die Docs 'rausrücken wie wir mit OSM-Daten
routingfähige Karten bauen können oder ich wechsle auf eine offenere
Plattform, für die wir eigene Software bauen können.
Wenn es die denn irgendwann mal tatsächlich geben sollte.
Das
Christoph Eckert schrieb:
Hi,
Das Problem ist, dass es nichts gibt, was die Akkulaufzeit und das
wasserdichte Gehäuse eines Garmin einerseits und die features einer offenen
Plattform andererseits hat.
sure. Wobei es mich wundert dass noch nie einer ein robustes, wetterfestes
Handy
Sven Geggus schrieb:
Nils Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sollte ja mit cGPSmapper gehen. Die Version, die das kann, kostet
aber 2800 USD.
A temporary description of the Data Routing Format is available here. This
is not the final version, but some important information can be found
Moin,
http://cgpsmapper.com/download/RFormat_temp.zip
da steht nur, wie man Daten bauen kann, die cgpsmapper dann in routingfähige
Garminkarten konvertiert. Dort steht nicht, wie das routingfähige Dateiformat
für Garmingeräte aussieht.
Unter
http://sourceforge.net/projects/garmin-img/
findet
Hi,
Das Problem ist, dass es nichts gibt, was die Akkulaufzeit und das
wasserdichte Gehäuse eines Garmin einerseits und die features einer offenen
Plattform andererseits hat.
sure. Wobei es mich wundert dass noch nie einer ein robustes, wetterfestes
Handy gebaut hat.
Nicht mal OpenMoko
Hi!
Laut heise online wird Tele Atlas demnächst (Oktober) spezielles
Kartenmaterial, das für Navigation für Fußgänger ausgelegt ist,
anbieten:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/103210
Naja, mal schauen wie weit wir im Oktober sind!
Nils
___
Christoph Eckert schrieb:
Entweder soll Garmin die Docs 'rausrücken wie wir mit OSM-Daten routingfähige
Karten bauen können oder ich wechsle auf eine offenere Plattform, für die wir
eigene Software bauen können. Nicht zahlen sollten wir für ein
Closed-Source-Tool, das dazuhilft den
Nils Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sollte ja mit cGPSmapper gehen. Die Version, die das kann, kostet
aber 2800 USD.
A temporary description of the Data Routing Format is available here. This
is not the final version, but some important information can be found here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juergen Buchner schrieb:
ups .. sorry für die leere Mail ;-)
Eigentlich finde ich diesen sofortigen Automatismus nicht so doll. Da
ich während der Arbeit öfters zwischenspeichere, werden dann sofort
Render-Requests ausgelöst. Gottseidank mit
Am Freitag 08 Februar 2008 schrieb Ulf Lamping:
Ich kann mir auch gut vorstellen, daß es sowas wie ein Nokia N800 (oder
auch einen PDA) auch mal in wasserfest geben wird. Die Integration des
GPS ist ja jetzt schon Realität.
naja, zumindest fuer einige pdas gibt's bereits verschiedene gehaeuse
Jiri Klement napsal(a):
Zdravim,
Napsal jsem xslt transformace pro prevod silnic v databance rsd do
osm. Nemam samozrejme v umyslu to importovat, je to spis mysleno jako
podklad pri kresleni silnic.
Je to ke stazeni tady:
http://home.zcu.cz/~jklement/osmrsd.zip
Vypada to moc pekne a
Arnaud, le centroïde d'une commune, notamment à la campagne, peut être
très loin de ce que les habitants considère comme étant le centre de
leur commune.
D'où l'utilisation de la mairie, de la place importante de la
ville/village, etc.
Renaud.
2008/2/8 Philippe Piquer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
moi
Personnellement je le place là où moi je considère qu'il s'agisse du centre
de la ville. Je prends une vue globale de la ville, je cherche à l'oeil le
centre, et je cherche ensuite un coin pas trop chargé où je pourrais y
mettre un node sans que ce soit le boxon.
2008/2/8 serge karamazov [EMAIL
serge karamazov a écrit :
Arnaud, le centroïde d'une commune, notamment à la campagne, peut être
très loin de ce que les habitants considère comme étant le centre de
leur commune.
Il y a aussi des mairies complètement excentrée, voir presque en dehors
de la ville. (Je pense à un bled à côté
A ce moment là je place au centroide de l'agglomération principale, ou au
barycentre des différents hameaux suivant leur importance. Et oui, parfois
c'est en plein champs (surtout en Normandie, avec son habitat dispersé), mais
mon idée est que un logiciel ai le maximum de chances de trouver la
The large river problem is also related to the closed coastline one.
I don't like having to decide where I close coastlines at the end of a
large river.
Couldn't we tag riverbank with the same rules as coastline, and let them
both be processed by the same pre-processor ?
Using this method,
Arnaud CORBET a écrit :
Une petite question me vient: est-ce que quelqu'un a la liste
des zones couvertes par Yahoo en haute résolution?
Yahoo ne la fourni pas, et c'est une liste qui évolue.
Il y a une page sur le wiki d'OSM, mais sans aucune garantie
d'exhaustivité évidement :
Salut,
Suite à ton message je découvre que la ville de Vannes propose ce PLU en
pdf mais aucune mention légale n'y ait jointe. Qu'a t'on le droit de
faire avec ce petit pdf ? :)
Jérôme BLUM a écrit :
Certaines villes mettent à disposition leur PLU au format PDF sur leur
site Web. Il peut
Il y a aussi des mairies complètement excentrée,
Peut-être faudrait-il créer un thread séparé pour discuter des points restés
ouverts pendant la réunion IRC.
En attendant, merci à Jonathanmm pour son boulot.
A quand la prochaine réunion IRC et avec quel intervalle ? une fois par an ?
tous
Certaines villes mettent à disposition leur PLU au format PDF sur leur
site Web. Il peut s'agir d'une bonne source pour récupérer assez
précisément les limites communales.
Vous pouvez voir un exemple partiel pour la ville de Châtillon :
Pour délimiter ta ville, tu as utilisé les key boudary et left/right=Clamart
Question :
- n'aurais tu pas dû plutot utiliser left:city=Clamart ? (ça permet de
définir plus facilement plusieurs limites sur un même endroit... limite
de ville/département)
- ne serait il pas possible d'utiliser ces
Une première piste :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Yahoo%21_Aerial_Imagery/Coverage
Bien entendu très incomplet...
On Feb 8, 2008 5:17 PM, Arnaud CORBET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Une petite question me vient: est-ce que quelqu'un a la liste des zones
couvertes par Yahoo en haute
Callum Noble wrote:
Hi All,
I was speaking to someone involved with the Scout Network in Scotland,
which is an organisation for ex-Scouts aged 18-25.
He suggests a joint mapping weekend/party somewhere in Central Scotland
between the Scouts and some OSM contributers. With some of us to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Paley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being ignorant, I don't know what the capabilities and limitations of GPX
files are. Apart from tracks, will they take waypoints and routes ?
They can, yes. We only use tracks though.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL
Hi,
I see 'openstreetmap' already exists using 'funny' GPX files. For a couple
of years now I've been thinking about 'OpenMapSource' - Garmin's MapSource
type mapping but 'open' and created by Garmin users - or at least those who
can create and handle GDB files.
Being ignorant, I don't know what
Mike Paley wrote:
I see 'openstreetmap' already exists using 'funny' GPX files. For a
couple
of years now I've been thinking about 'OpenMapSource' - Garmin's
MapSource
type mapping but 'open' and created by Garmin users - or at least
those who
can create and handle GDB files.
Being
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 16:45 +, Callum Noble wrote:
Any Glasgow/Edinburgh/Central Scotland people interested in this?
As one of the longest term OSM people in Scotland (sorry about
boasting), I'd better go on the record saying that I wouldn't be there.
I have some major issues at the
61 matches
Mail list logo
