Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 27.10.17 00:49, Dave F wrote: [...] I think you'd be hard pressed to find any area of trees which hasn't been managed in one way or another by humans; especially in the Western world. [...] There is a theory nowadays that woods should be left alone to natural cycles which may last

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

>Io sarei per tenerli, secondo me sono mappati in modo chiarissimo. Anch'io sono per tenerli. Andreas Lattmann -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

>Andreas, i waypoint non sono dati variabili che cambiano col meteo :) Grazie. Ora lo so. È quello che avevo capito dal wiki. Andreas Lattmann -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità. ___ Talk-it mailing list

[OSM-talk-fr] Re : Rapprochement Bano

Le jeudi 26 octobre 2017 à 10:45 +0200, Christian Quest a écrit : > Les applis qui ont besoin d'adresses peuvent utiliser celles d'OSM et > compléter avec d'autres sources (BANO en est une). [...] > On va aussi pouvoir bien mieux exploiter les données du cadastre dans > un avenir très proche, vu

[Talk-ko] Telegram (was: Re: Romanisation: a solution)

I agree on this assessment of Telegram as a platform. However, it is very useful as a low-entry barrier place for casual discussion, quick question and dialogue type conversation that are harder in email, that requires a style that resembles more a letter exchange. The mailinglist is the

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Mills wrote: > The tree cover issue is precisely why many states that have seasons have a > recurrent leaf-off (sometimes even in IR) imaging program. > > Arkansas has their imagery, along with a raft of other open data, available > on

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

You had me all excited to see Washington in your list, turns out it's DC. I am impressed with the quality of work the locals are doing. Very few ways in your extract. Do you have your process document anywhere so we can reproduce the results for other areas? Clifford -- @osm_seattle

[OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

(Split to a separate thread) The woods/forest problem is one of the worst tagging cock-ups in OSM. It's bad enough when alternate values are used to differentiate what is actually the same object, but in this case it's also the key! I think you'd be hard pressed to find any area of trees

[OSM-talk] Woods Vs Forests (Was Topology rules)

Started a new thread as it's gone of subject. DaveF. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

Washington State just completed a aerial imagery program this spring, a leaf-off program. It was funded by individual sources so the rasters aren't available. Fortunately, many of the counties have open data with road centerlines. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Il 26 ott 2017 11:10 PM, "David Paleino" ha scritto: Andreas, i waypoint non sono dati variabili che cambiano col meteo :) Ciao e bentornato, Io sarei per tenerli, secondo me sono mappati in modo chiarissimo. Ciao /niubii/ ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Topology rules

W dniu 26.10.2017 o 23:36, Warin pisze: While natural=wood renders, I also tag them as landcover=trees as that is more truthful of what is there. So these tree areas get two tags from me until such time as landcover is rendered then I will remove the natural tag. If you mean standard tile

Re: [OSM-talk] Topology rules

On 27-Oct-17 12:00 AM, Joseph Reeves wrote: A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones that are used for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that tag is used for any land that is covered with trees. So formally, landuse=forest shouldn't overlap with

Re: [Talk-es] Ediciones realizadas como función de un puesto de trabajo

Buenas, partiendo de la base que OSM está creciendo en número de usuarios y cada vez habrá más ediciones comunitarias o guiadas, hace poco se estuvo haciendo una encuesta sobre cómo deberían ser las directrices para este tipo de ediciones. Se contemplaron tanto los casos de grupos de edición

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

The tree cover issue is precisely why many states that have seasons have a recurrent leaf-off (sometimes even in IR) imaging program. Arkansas has their imagery, along with a raft of other open data, available on Geostor as a WMS service that should be usable in JOSM and also as downloadable

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Andreas, i waypoint non sono dati variabili che cambiano col meteo :) Il 26 Ott 2017 10:45 PM, "Andreas Lattmann" ha scritto: > Dai David, non fare così... i motivi sul perché non vengono mappate è > spiegato sul wiki. Purtroppo ci sono molte, troppe variabili che

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Dai David, non fare così... i motivi sul perché non vengono mappate è spiegato sul wiki. Purtroppo ci sono molte, troppe variabili che fanno mutare questi dati, anche giornalmente: "Similarly, don’t upload your flight path traces, or draw air routes on the map: routes vary because of weather,

Re: [Talk-it] Incontro di co-design a Bologna

Il 24 ott 2017 20:18, "Volker Schmidt" ha scritto: Sono ingeressato. Volker (Padova) Ciao Volker, ci vediamo lì allora. Ciao. Lorenzo 2017-10-24 18:54 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Perone : > Ciao, > scusate il cross-posting, mi hanno invitato ad un

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:00 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > Thank you, Tod. Yes, I MIGHT find a VERY SELECT SUBSET of these data > SOMEWHAT useful, as minor amounts of them seem to be accurate and > more-up-to-date enough to introduce into OSM. But certainly not

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Mi ero perso la "on-the-ground-rule". Resto dell'idea fossero buoni dati, ma potete pure revertare. Mi cospargo il capo di cenere e torno alla mia vita. Ciao, David Il 26 Ott 2017 9:42 PM, "David Paleino" ha scritto: > Secondo quale logica, allora, in passato ho mappato

Re: [Talk-it] Nominatim ed abbreviazioni

sent from a phone > On 26. Oct 2017, at 20:34, Davide Sandona' wrote: > > (al momento sembra che si occupi del progetto solamente l'utente Lonvia), si, da anni che Sarah Hoffmann contribuisce quasi da sola: https://github.com/openstreetmap/Nominatim/commits/master

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Le 26 octobre 2017 à 11:16, marc marc a écrit : > > Pour les numéros de bâtiments il y a 5 méthodes : > Partant de ce principe, c'est déjà mal parti pour avoir un consensus. Comme Christian l'a à nouveau rappelé, adresse et bâtiment sont deux notions différentes.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Le 26 octobre 2017 à 10:40, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit : > > Je fais en général attention à bien marquer local_survey comme source de > ceux que j'ai vérifié sur place. > Juste la valeur "local_survey" n'est pas documentée dans le wiki. Il s'agit de "survey" tout simplement.

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

On the weekend, people might be more available(work and school might prevent people) On Oct 26, 2017 3:52 PM, "Tracey P. Lauriault" wrote: > Once you have a date let me know and I can check in on space. THe ateium > is grand, food is a monopoly situation, but if during the

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

Once you have a date let me know and I can check in on space. THe ateium is grand, food is a monopoly situation, but if during the weekend we can work around stuff. On Thursday, October 26, 2017, James wrote: > Setting a time would also be in order, but I imagine this has

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Secondo quale logica, allora, in passato ho mappato i gasdotti sotterranei? Oppure le partita IVA dei negozi? O ancora, perché mappiamo i lampioni? Gli alberi? Sono davvero utili nell'orienteering? I dati sono dati, se nel rendering non vuoi mostrare gli aeroway=waypoint -- che ben venga! -- ma

Re: [Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Un waypoint mappabile può essere qualsiasi oggetto fisico usato come riferimento per la navigazione, al quale potresti aggiungere aeroway=waypoint. IMHO i waypoint che hai mappato dovrebbero invece essere tolti, come i nodi senza tag o way. Il 26/ott/2017 20:51, "David Paleino"

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:00 AM, OSM Volunteer stevea < stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: > Thank you, Tod. Yes, I MIGHT find a VERY SELECT SUBSET of these data > SOMEWHAT useful, as minor amounts of them seem to be accurate and > more-up-to-date enough to introduce into OSM. But certainly not

[Talk-it] Mappatura di oggetti "virtuali"

Buonasera a tutti, (ben ritrovati!) Vi segnalo http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9603572 . Dal mio passato di mappatore non vedo problemi in quel mio changeset; è cambiato qualcosa nell'approccio ai dati inseribili? Ora, siccome non ho né il tempo, né la voglia di controbattere ancora a

Re: [Talk-it] Nominatim ed abbreviazioni

tempo fa notai anch'io questa cosa. Secondo me, essendo il team che si occupa di Nominatim numericamente esiguo (al momento sembra che si occupi del progetto solamente l'utente Lonvia), è assai difficile implementare tutte le cose che vengono aggiunte in quella pagina wiki e soprattutto testarle

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] fin d'une route secondaire ou tertiaire vers un hameau

Le 12. 10. 17 à 22:43, Stéphane Péneau a écrit : > De mon point de vue, ce ne sont pas des _link. comment les taguerais-tu ? en sachant que même sans link, osmose rapporte une anomalie si une tertiaire s'arrête sans connexion vers une route de classe semblable ou supérieur. > Le 12/10/2017 à

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

Thank you, Tod. Yes, I MIGHT find a VERY SELECT SUBSET of these data SOMEWHAT useful, as minor amounts of them seem to be accurate and more-up-to-date enough to introduce into OSM. But certainly not using any sort of automated method. Essentially, every single datum would need to be

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Badita Florin wrote: ... > Did not had time to look at each individual state, but i will share the > insight for Arizona : > Feel free to look at the other states. > And please, if you want me to run this on any public dataset, just tell >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] corrections Osmose et rues sans nom

Dans ces cas là, il faut ouvrir les tickets pour les apps sinon le problème va se reproduire J'ai ouvert un ticket osmose https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/239 et un pour StreetComplete https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/663 Le 19. 10. 17 à 22:42, Jérôme

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

In the area I now live in California, my first impression looking at this is that the data is garbage. It looks to me that blindly importing would re-introduce TIGER errors that have been successfully removed. Looking at a tiny area in Arizona where my family still has a house, it is not much

Re: [Talk-cz] Fotky v mapě

Ahoj, za mne vyfotím, nahraju na Wikimedia Commons a na daný objekt přidám tag: image=File:soubo-na-commons.jpg , případně wikimedia_commons=Category:kategorie-objektu-v-commons . Je to i tak doporučováno na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image Rozcestníky nahrávám na osm.cz a

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Bonjour, (Excusez-moi, si cette question n’apparait pas au bonne endroit - c'est mon 1èr message sur cette liste.) J'ai une question par rapport aux données suivantes : > (Message de Christian Quest Mer 25 Oct 13:55:58 UTC 2017 :) > "Pour les points en violet, ce sont des adresses issues

Re: [Talk-us] Comparing Tiger 2017 dataset with OSM in a automatedway.

I don't know where all of this is going, and wanted to see for myself, so I downloaded the California file (the largest one of all) and zoomed in on where I live and am most familiar with, Santa Cruz County. Thank you for providing the ten states worth of translated data for us to take a look.

[Talk-cz] Fotky v mapě

Ahoj, koukal jsem na wiki a našel: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Photo_ linking Pokud pominu že je ta stránka celý jeden den stará a popisuje nesprávné použití některých tagů... Jaké metody používáte pro fotky? Nahráváte do Mapillary, OpenStreetView, Wikimedia Commons, ...? Jak je odkazujete

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

Setting a time would also be in order, but I imagine this has to be figured out based on availability of rooms On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Kent Jacobs wrote: > Thank you all for the responses! > > > > I would like to have this during OSM Geoweek, but that week is

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

Thank you all for the responses! I would like to have this during OSM Geoweek, but that week is approaching quickly. It would make sense to first designate a time and space to hold the Mapathon. I was thinking November 16th or 17th. This is after Nov. 14th event at the Royal Canadian

Re: [Talk-ko] Romanisation: a solution

Agree, data consumers should read the tag case insensitive, just in case, but for tagging we should follow one recommendation and that should be -Latn On 2017년 10월 26일 23:47, Lukas Sommer wrote: Makes sense! (I’m not sure about lowercase. I would rather opt for ko-Latn because also also

Re: [Talk-ko] Romanisation: a solution

Makes sense! (I’m not sure about lowercase. I would rather opt for ko-Latn because also also sr-Latn uses titlecase.) Lukas Sommer 2017-10-26 3:06 GMT+00:00 Maarten van den Hoven : > Dear OSM editors, > > > This email proposes a solution to the Korean and Japanese

[Talk-GB] Adding unmapped postcodes using FHRS data

Hi all, Using Robert Whittaker's excellent postcode stats (available in an interactive form here: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/stats/), I've created a list of the FHRS establishments that have a postcode which currently hasn't been assigned to any objects in OpenStreetMap. As part

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Bonjour, > De: "Philippe Verdy" > > En bref, BANO est un "aggrégateur" de données, dont les sources sont > OSM, la BAN, et d'autres bases ouvertes en OpenData des > collectivités locales ou de certaines entreprises. Non on ne peut pas dire que la BAN alimente BANO. Mais

[Talk-it] Nominatim ed abbreviazioni

Sono incappato nella pagina delle abbreviazioni [1] ed ho bisogno di chiarimenti, visto che l'argomento potrebbe risolvere alxune delle annose questioni degli addr. Perché in italiano la colonna "implemented" é vuota? Come seguire lo stato di questa implementazione? Perché le citate nuove colonne

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Standard Layer

I have, I think, reverted the offending changesets (which unfortunately required removing all the users work). I have messaged the project manager both via the HOT TM and OSM messages, and messaged DWG as well. Now to get back to adding stuff from my surveys in Northern Ireland (which is

Re: [Talk-de] Deutsche Namens-Tags in Polen

Am 26. Oktober 2017 um 14:56 schrieb Richard : > abgesehen von der poltisch-moralischen Dimension ist es Unfug irgendwelche > Namen einzutragen die > * dem Großteil der Nutzer und Einwohner nicht geläufig sind > * sich auf keiner Ortstafel uä finden. > > nach dieser

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Le 26 octobre 2017 à 11:56, Christian Quest a écrit : > Vu la diversité de modélisation des adresses dans OSM (pas qu'en France), > c'est là aussi que BANO est utile car ça remet tout ça sous une unique > forme simple et un réutilisateur ayant besoin d'adresses devrait

Re: [Talk-de] Deutsche Namens-Tags in Polen

On 26.10.2017 14:56, Richard wrote: Vielleicht mal als name:1939-1944 Nein, als old_name:-, jetzt auch ordentlich dokumentiert. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:old_name tom ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Topology rules

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:50:40PM +0300, Tomas Straupis wrote: > Hello > > For a long time I wanted to hear opinion on the topic of topology rules. > > By "topology rules" here I mean just simple rules such as: > * polygon X should not overlap polygon Y > * polygon X should always be

Re: [OSM-talk] Topology rules

A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones that are used for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that tag is used for any land that is covered with trees. So formally, landuse=forest shouldn't overlap with other zones, but practically, until a new tag (landcover=trees)

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

I am glad I provided the *How NOT to do* template ;) Let me know when it is on and if I am free I will join! On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:38 AM, John Marshall wrote: > I'm also available. > > John > > On Oct 26, 2017 06:17, "James" wrote: > >> Hey Kent, I'd

Re: [Talk-de] Deutsche Namens-Tags in Polen

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 03:19:04PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 25. Oct 2017, at 13:53, SteMo wrote: > > > > 2. In Polen findet man, mit wenigen Ausnahmen auf historischen > > Baudenkmälern oder in Geschichtsbüchern _keine_ Verwendung dieser

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Standard Layer

Thanks, Phil. I've commented on the changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5322 Regards, *Paul* On 26 October 2017 at 13:30, Philip Barnes wrote: > I see it too, also this strange large building http://osm.org/5322 > > > Missing maps rubbish... > >

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

I've added a note to those trails saying that it's been discussed twice now and linked this email chain with the mail archive: Name as been discussed twice. Although vulgar, seems to be accurate. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-October/008145.html On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at

Re: [OSM-talk] Topology rules

I like the idea of formalizing OSM topology! An example: power lines should share nodes with nothing except power towers, portals and buildings (substation buildings). A problem i find is with landuse=forest. Formally, those are zones that are used for growing trees. But practically in OSM, that

[Talk-it] R: Re: Alberi Monumentali Provincia di Pistoia

potresti inserire per ulteriori informazioni l'indirizzo della pro locolocale o dell'ufficio provinciale che ha editato l'elenco Messaggio originale Da: cascaf...@gmail.com Data: 26-ott-2017 13.48 A: "openstreetmap list - italiano" Ogg: Re:

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Standard Layer

I see it too, also this strange large building http://osm.org/5322 Missing maps rubbish... Phil (trigpoint) On 26 October 2017 13:12:02 BST, Paul Berry wrote: >Has there been a change to the colours on the Standard Layer or has >someone >inadvertently turned

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

I grew up in this municipality, but not near that area and I am not a mountain biker. I am not surprised by those names though... ugh they are horrible. Julia On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Denis Carriere wrote: > Unfortunately does names seem legit for that type of

[Talk-GB] OSM Standard Layer

Has there been a change to the colours on the Standard Layer or has someone inadvertently turned the UK into heath/farmland in the last 24 hours? Visible at zoom level 13 only, it seems. Regards, *Paul* ___ Talk-GB mailing list

Re: [Talk-it] Alberi Monumentali Provincia di Pistoia

Be'... sono 105 :-( faccio finta di non saperlo :-) Una cosa a proposito di privacy: nel dataset appaiono i link per ogni albero alla relativa scheda (pubblicata dalla Provincia di Pistoia) dove ci sono ulteriori dettagli, tra i quali accesso o meno al punto ed in questo caso nome, cognome e

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

I'm also available. John On Oct 26, 2017 06:17, "James" wrote: > Hey Kent, I'd be glad to help out :) > > On Oct 26, 2017 12:51 AM, "Kent Jacobs" wrote: > >> Hello all! >> >> >> >> I am a Masters of Science student in the Geography department at

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

Hey Kent, I'd be glad to help out :) On Oct 26, 2017 12:51 AM, "Kent Jacobs" wrote: > Hello all! > > > > I am a Masters of Science student in the Geography department at Carleton > University studying Quality Assessment of OSM data for my thesis. I am also > currently

Re: [Talk-it] Rilevazione IGN francese

Bello, certo che si potesse usare tutti un Trimble professionalecomunque non disperiamo, considerando che ormai Galileo e' operativo, che i chip cominciano ad essere a disposizione e che Samsung (con l'universita' di Austiin) ha un progetto attivo di miniaturizzazione del processore che

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Le 26 octobre 2017 à 11:16, marc marc a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Christian quand tu dis que Bano agrège différentes sources d'adresse > opendata dont osm, comment a l'inverse les outils utilisent bano ? > ça, c'est à chaque outil qu'il faut poser la question... >

Re: [Talk-de] Garmin gmapsupp.img funktioniert nicht mehr mit qlandkartegt / qmapshack

Hallo Andreas, kannst du mir die img files zukommen lassen, dann kann ich mal bei mir mit qmapshack schauen (1.9.1) ob's tut. Habe qmapshack zuletzt im Sommer mit Openmtb Karten genutzt. Alternativ könntest du dir img-Files von extract.bbbike.org runterladen. Ich habe es gerade mit dieser

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Bonjour, Christian quand tu dis que Bano agrège différentes sources d'adresse opendata dont osm, comment a l'inverse les outils utilisent bano ? est-ce que nominatim ou un app utilise bano ? ou cela reste une superbe base composite mais utilisée uniquement pour l'édition manuelle d'som ? Le 26.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Les applis qui ont besoin d'adresses peuvent utiliser celles d'OSM et compléter avec d'autres sources (BANO en est une). Je rappelle aussi que BANO contient aussi les adresses présentes dans OSM (mise à jour chaque nuit), ce qui simplifie la vie de ceux qui ont besoin d'adresses qui n'ont du coup

[Talk-it] Rilevazione IGN francese

Ciao a tutti, ieri sera stavo guardando "Des racines & des ailes" su TV5Monde e, a un certo punto, hanno fatto vedere come IGN (http://www.ign.fr/) fa le sue rilevazioni, iniziando dal Colle del Piccolo San Bernardo. L'ho trovato interessante. Il video è disponibile qui:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Par chez moi, je n'ajoute des numéros que si j'ai au préalable fait un repérage sur le terrain (photos, etc..) S'il me manque certains numéros, et que ceux que j'ai vérifiés correspondent bien avec Bano/Cadastre, alors je complète avec ces sources. Merci pour ces précisons. En ce qui me

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Le 26/10/2017 à 09:51, Nicolas Moyroud a écrit : Il serait plus que temps de se demander comment on procède et quelles recommandations on propose pour l'intégration des numéros d'adresses dans OSM Par chez moi, je n'ajoute des numéros que si j'ai au préalable fait un repérage sur le terrain

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

Bonjour, Mais quel est le plan pour les numéros ? Parce que même si ils sont dans la BANO, ça ne m'aide pas lorsque je cherche une adresse and Osmand, Maps.me ou autres. 100% d'accord avec ça. L'argument "oui mais c'est déjà dans BANO" n'est pas à mon avis pas valable sur une liste qui concerne

Re: [Talk-de] Deutsche Namens-Tags in Polen

sent from a phone On 26. Oct 2017, at 08:11, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> Ausländer haben in fremden Ländern keine Namen zu mappen! > > Wie viele der ca. 40 verschiedenen Namen für München sind wohl von dort > lebenden Personen eingetragen ;) > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rapprochement Bano

On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Christian Quest wrote: [...] > Pour les numéros, si on a envie de les intégrer on peut le faire, mais > ça prend beaucoup de temps et il semble bien plus utile dans un premier > temps d'avoir déjà toutes les rues nommées. Pour ceux qui de toute façon > ont besoin d'utiliser

Re: [Talk-de] Deutsche Namens-Tags in Polen

Hi, On 25.10.2017 18:44, Markus wrote: > Ausländer haben in fremden Ländern keine Namen zu mappen! Wie viele der ca. 40 verschiedenen Namen für München sind wohl von dort lebenden Personen eingetragen ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1700534808 Ist durchaus eine Diskussion, die man führen