Re: [talk-ph] Proposed OpenStreetMap Philippines Logo

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Eugene Alvin Villar
Hi guys, Here's another version incorporating the three stars and a sun elements of the Philippine flag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSMPH_Logo_test.png So which one do you prefer? Comments and suggestions area welcome. :-) Eugene (aka: seav) On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Eugene

Re: [talk-ph] Proposed OpenStreetMap Philippines Logo

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Mark Cupitt
suggestion, wrapping the philippine flag around the magnifying glass handle? On Feb 11, 2013 8:16 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Here's another version incorporating the three stars and a sun elements of the Philippine flag:

Re: [talk-ph] Proposed OpenStreetMap Philippines Logo

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden maning sambale
I like them both! Although I prefer the first version (PH map only). One personal request is to remove the star (Manila country capital), never been a fan of Manila as much more important than the rest of the country. :) Can we run a like campaign on facebook? Great work Eugene (as always)! On

[OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jo
This is about the translation of a wiki page to Dutch as a result of our gathering in Lier yesterday. So the rest of the text is in Dutch. We hebben heel wat kunnen bespreken op de bijeenkomst gisteren in Lier. Eén van de pijnpunten is het moeilijk terugvinden van *pertinente *informatie op de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Ben Laenen
On Sunday 10 February 2013 10:19:58 Jo wrote: We hebben heel wat kunnen bespreken op de bijeenkomst gisteren in Lier. Eén van de pijnpunten is het moeilijk terugvinden van *pertinente *informatie op de wiki. Je had misschien toch een herinnering moeten sturen naar de mailing list want ik was

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jo
Op 10 februari 2013 12:55 schreef Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com het volgende: On Sunday 10 February 2013 10:19:58 Jo wrote: We hebben heel wat kunnen bespreken op de bijeenkomst gisteren in Lier. Eén van de pijnpunten is het moeilijk terugvinden van *pertinente *informatie op de wiki.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-02-10 10:19, Jo wrote : This is about the translation of a wiki page to Dutch as a result of our gathering in Lier yesterday. So the rest of the text is in Dutch. J'ai jeté un coup d'œil à la page en français et je constate qu'elle concerne

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jo
There are of course some minor differences between The Netherlands and Belgium, but they are not big enough to warrant 2 separate wiki pages. Thus the NL page is the translation in Dutch of the German page. Where there are differences for specific tags/sections of the page, this can be added in

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden A.Pirard.Papou
What I mean is that if anything is specific to one country, I suggest to add a picture or sign containing the two letters of that country in front of that anything.  Dutch is read by more than BE and NL. Making the same page in English would help

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jo
2013/2/10 A.Pirard.Papou a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com What I mean is that if anything is specific to one country, I suggest to add a picture or sign containing the two letters of that country in front of that anything. Dutch is read by more than BE and NL. Making the same page in English

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Glenn Plas
I don't mind taking a throw at translating anything from English to Dutch. I've been americanised enough by work that I probably write better English than Dutch by now. That being said, someone better prepare him/herself to edit my work so it doesn't sound like a techie wrote it and the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Ivo De Broeck
Ik denk dat we verkeerd bezig zijn: Deze pagina is GEEN vertaling van de orginele How-to-map_a (engelstalig). Ik vrees ook dat de pagina te groot is. PS: heb het hulp-scherm aangepast (verwees constant naar DE) Op 10 februari 2013 20:06 schreef Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com het volgende: On

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Ivo De Broeck
Deze pagina is GEEN vertaling van de orginele How-to-map_a (engelstalig). Dit lijkt mij in te gaan tegen de regels van de wiki. Dat de pagina (te) groot is, is een ander probleem. Op 10 februari 2013 20:38 schreef Jo winfi...@gmail.com het volgende: Ik kreeg die errors ook als ik de hele pagina

Re: [OSM-talk-be] wiki how_to_map_a

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Guy Vanvuchelen
Of het nu een vertaling is van de Duitse, de Engelse of de Chinese versie is, wat heeft dat voor belang. Als het maar duidelijk is voor de (beginnende) gebruiker. Dat was toch het doel van onze beslissing in Lier. Het zou spijtig zijn als deze eindeloze discussie er toe leidt dat er niets gedaan

[OSM-talk] SOTM-FR online registration open

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Christian Quest
Online registration for the upcoming State Of The Map France are now open on eventbrite: http://sotmfr2013.eventbrite.fr/ It will take place in Lyon on 23rd and 24th of february (that's in 2 weeks). For more details about this event, please have a look at the wiki pages:

[OSM-talk] mapping bridges - some ideas

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Robin Paulson
i've been thinking about this for a while and it's bugging me, so i'd like to hear what the rest of you think. the way we map bridges at the moment is by adding tags to the road/railway/footpath/etc., something like this: bridge = yes layer = 1 which seems a bit clumsy, and doesn't reflect

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping bridges - some ideas

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Cartinus
On 02/10/2013 11:50 PM, Robin Paulson wrote: comments, suggestions, revisions, problems, etc. please? Please don't start another discussion on the same subject in yet another place, but join the existing ones. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dbridge and the two

Re: [Talk-br] Palestra Técnica do CISL: Apresentando o OpenStreetMap

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Arlindo Pereira
Pessoal, subi o vídeo no YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1wJajkzWe4 Apesar do vídeo estar disponibilizado no site do CISL/Serpro (inclusive num codec livre, o OGG) acho que o YouTube é um bom canal para quem esteja procurando por OSM nele. Lembrando, os slides estão disponíveis em

Re: [Talk-br] Palestra Técnica do CISL: Apresentando o OpenStreetMap

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Arlete Meneguette
Arlindo Postei ambos os links na nossa FanPage de Geocolaboração em https://www.facebook.com/Geocolaboracao Arlete Em 10 de fevereiro de 2013 15:46, Arlindo Pereira openstreet...@arlindopereira.com escreveu: Pessoal, subi o vídeo no YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1wJajkzWe4

Re: [Talk-de] Tags für die grüne Welle

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Timo Schaal
Hallo, ich bin skeptisch. Das ist ja nochmals komplizierter als ÖPNV Relationen und die versteht doch schon kaum einer. Außerdem frage ich mich, wie man an solche Informationen ran kommen soll? Beim ÖPNV kann ich einfach eine Linie abfahren und kenne damit die Relation. Zusätzlich gibt es

Re: [Talk-de] Tags für die grüne Welle

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Alexander Lehner
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Timo Schaal wrote: Hallo, ich bin skeptisch. Das ist ja nochmals komplizierter als ÖPNV Relationen und die versteht doch schon kaum einer. Außerdem frage ich mich, wie man an solche Informationen ran kommen soll? Beim ÖPNV kann ich einfach eine Linie abfahren und

Re: [Talk-de] Tags für die grüne Welle

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden gmbo
Am 10.02.2013 13:12, schrieb Alexander Lehner: On Sun, 10 Feb 2013, Timo Schaal wrote: Hallo, ich bin skeptisch. Das ist ja nochmals komplizierter als ÖPNV Relationen und die versteht doch schon kaum einer. Außerdem frage ich mich, wie man an solche Informationen ran kommen soll? Beim

Re: [Talk-de] Tags für die grüne Welle

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jörg Frings-Fürst
Am Sonntag, den 10.02.2013, 12:54 +0100 schrieb Timo Schaal: Hallo, ich bin skeptisch. Das ist ja nochmals komplizierter als ÖPNV Relationen und die versteht doch schon kaum einer. Außerdem frage ich mich, wie man an solche Informationen ran kommen soll? Beim ÖPNV kann ich einfach eine

Re: [Talk-it] modus operandi ?

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Alexander Roalter
On 08.02.2013 20:27, David Paleino wrote: On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 02:28:41 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2013/2/7 Mario Pichetti mario.piche...@gmail.com: Il 05/02/2013 22:40, David Paleino ha scritto: Un numero di telefono certamente non deve contenere spazi. personalmente preferisco

Re: [Talk-it] modus operandi ?

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Damjan Gerl
Anche io sono per i numeri telefonici con gli spazi. All'inizio lo mettevo solamente tra il prefisso nazionale ed il numero telefonico (il prefisso nazionale non è più un prefisso, ma fa parte integrante del numero), mentre gli ultimi tempi ho optato per usare lo spazio anche tra il prefisso

[Talk-it] Mappare la M5

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Michael Moroni
Da oggi la prima parte della metropolitana lilla di Milano è aperta. Qualcun* vuole mappare la nuova metro e farsi un giro sulla metro senza conducente? - MM -- Michael Moroni (+39)3313151159 @Airon90 Non stampare questa email se non necessario! Pensa all'ambiente! Ne presu ĉi tiun retpoŝton

Re: [Talk-it] Mappare la M5

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden emmexx
Il 02/10/2013 01:59 PM, Michael Moroni scrisse: Da oggi la prima parte della metropolitana lilla di Milano è aperta. Qualcun* vuole mappare la nuova metro e farsi un giro sulla metro senza conducente? Guarda che e' gia' mappata da un bel po'... :-)

Re: [Talk-it] modus operandi ?

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Mario Pichetti
Il 10/02/2013 13:48, Damjan Gerl ha scritto: +39 040 123123 fatto http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:How_to_map_a:-) Ciao Mario. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Reminder: Social this Thursday (7th Feb)

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Rob Nickerson
Hi Florian, All, On Thursday, Stuart showed us his example map page [1] which is a good starting point (although I still think some banner across the top like the log-in banner we saw on Thursday would be nice). Today I found a very useful blog that discusses how to create Mapbox/Tilemill

[Talk-es] Un juez se fía más de los datos de Google Earth que del catastro

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Cruz Enrique Borges Hernandez
http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/galicia/2013/02/08/fiscala-urbanismo-vigo-dice-fia-google-earth-catastro/0003_201302G8P12994.htm Tiene huevos que usen las fotos de Google Earth antes que PNOA o similares. Eso o que el periodista no se ha empapado de una (cosa harto probable...). De todas

Re: [Talk-es] Un juez se fía más de los datos de Google Earth que del catastro

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Noel David Torres Taño
On Domingo, 10 de febrero de 2013 12:21:26 Cruz Enrique Borges Hernandez wrote: http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/galicia/2013/02/08/fiscala-urbanismo-v igo-dice-fia-google-earth-catastro/0003_201302G8P12994.htm Tiene huevos que usen las fotos de Google Earth antes que PNOA o similares.

Re: [Talk-es] Un juez se fía más de los datos de Google Earth que del catastro

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Cruz Enrique Borges Hernandez
¿PNOA tiene registro histórico? Digo yo que si, por lo menos para un juez. Estas cosas se hacen de vez en cuando y no creo que se tiren al cubo de la basura. ___ Talk-es mailing list Talk-es@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ar] Reunión OSM-Geoinquietos en DOT 6/2

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Martin Andrés Gomez Gimenez
El sáb, 09-02-2013 a las 21:18 -0300, Fernando Toledo escribió: Para este caso es posible hacer a través de SoLAr - Software Libre Argentina (www.solar.org.ar), es una asociación civil sin fines de lucro constituida legalmente y seguro no van a tener problemas por poner a dispocición la

[Talk-at] LUGT/OSM-Stammtisch Innsbruck am 14. Feber 2013

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Simon Legner
Servus! Wir möchten zum nächsten gemeinsamen LUGT-/OSM-Stammtisch einladen/erinnern: am Donnerstag, 14. Feber 2013 um 19:00 Uhr im Restaurant Kastanie Innsbrucker Straße 4, 6176 Völs Wir freuen uns auf ein zahlreiches Erscheinen! Die Einladung ist wie immer auch im OSM-Wiki zu finden:

Re: [Talk-at] Changesests in Leonding revidieren

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Simon Legner
Hallo, ich habe die genannten Changesets revertiert: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14977120 Dazu habe ich das Reverter-Plugin in JOSM verwendet und die drei Changesets von der höchsten zur niedrigsten Nummer revertieren lassen. Grüße aus Tirol Simon On Sun, 2013-02-10 at

Re: [Talk-at] Changesests in Leonding revidieren

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden moema
Liebe Community, ich bin der oben angesprochene dumme und vorschnelle neue User! Ich bin - zwar im Glauben etwas positives zu tun- übers Ziel hinausgeschossen!! Ich danke auch @flaimo, dass er mich sofort angeschrieben hat und auf meine Fehler aufmerksam gemacht hat. Ich möchte diese Fehler

Re: [Talk-at] Changesests in Leonding revidieren

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Simon Legner
Hallo moema! Ich möchte diese Fehler gerne ausmerzen, aber ich bin leider wirklich zu schwach auf der Brust, um die obigen Chancesets selbst zu revidieren. Ich habe das heute vormittags bereits erledigt. Das dürfte auch die vielen Konflikte bei dir erklären. Erklärung: Du versuchst jetzt

Re: [Talk-at] Changesests in Leonding revidieren

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden DI (fh) Lukas Dorn-Fussenegger
Hat jemand die Emailadresse von dem neuen User aus Leonding? Wohne ja auch dort, und da wäre es interessant sich mal zusammen zu setzen Lg -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Simon Legner [mailto:simon.leg...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013 09:45 An:

Re: [Talk-at] Changesests in Leonding revidieren

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Norbert Wenzel
On 02/11/2013 08:38 AM, DI (fh) Lukas Dorn-Fussenegger wrote: Hat jemand die Emailadresse von dem neuen User aus Leonding? Wohne ja auch dort, und da wäre es interessant sich mal zusammen zu setzen Siehe http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2013-February/005447.html Der User

[OSM-Talk-ZA] Cleaning up an old import

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden David Schneider
Hi List! I searched an address in the eastern parts of Cape Town, and I was suprised that nomatim didn't report it as residential. I checked the data, and found that vast parts of Cape Town's residential areas are made up from unclassified roads instead of residential! From the metadata, this

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] Cleaning up an old import

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Marlon v/d Linde
This is an excellent idea. I didn't even notice this. THe bandwidth and storage perks of doing this across large areas could be tremendous. I hope this can be done, I would not have even suggested this in fear of it going nowhere. Think I am going to start looking for similiar problems in my

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] Cleaning up an old import

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Gerhardus Geldenhuis
Hi I would suggest downloading the section in JOSM if you don't already use it. You can then very easily apply a filter and then select all the objects and apply/change a preset where required. I would also suggested contacting the contributor privately first before mailing to public forums. There

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Extraction parcours cyclable

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Claude
Le 09/02/2013 10:53, Christian Quest a écrit : Ca c'est ce que t'affiche ton navigateur... mais le contenu complet que tu as reçu (en XML) contient toutes les data... il suffit de visualiser le source de la page. 2013/2/9 Claude claude.mar...@gmail.com: Le 09/02/2013 10:20, Christian Quest a

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mise en place d'un miroir OSM

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Pieren
2013/2/9 Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr: Ce système de proxy/cache c'est ce que nous avons mis en place sur 2 Je ne ferais pas la promotion de ce proxy/cache tant que le problème de la confidentialité des authentifications ne sera pas résolu. Pieren

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mise en place d'un miroir OSM

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Philippe Verdy
Une remarque au sujet de ces stats : l'utilisation des inodes à 30% dépasse largement l'utilisation du volume en terme d'espace (voisin de 8%), cela suggère que les tuiles stockées sont 4 fois trop petites et que le serveur de tuiles devrait soir retourner des tuiles 4 fois plus grandes en

[OSM-talk-fr] [forum-osm-fr] Ouverture des inscriptions en ligne pour SOTM-FR 2013

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden forum
Le message suivant de : ## Voilà, les inscriptions sont ouvertes sur eventbrite: http://sotmfr2013.eventbrite.fr/ Une participation aux frais d'organisation de 30 euros est demandée, elle inclu les petits-déjeuner et les pique-nique de samedi et dimanche, ainsi que les goodies. Pour

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mise en place d'un miroir OSM

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Christophe Merlet
A part le fait que tu es complètement hors sujet dans ce fil de discussion, je suppose que tu t'es monté ton propre serveur de tuiles pour tester. Tu peux nous dire les perfs que tu obtiens pour comparer ? Le dimanche 10 février 2013 à 12:49 +0100, Philippe Verdy a écrit : Une remarque au sujet

[OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Bonsoir, derrière l'objet un rien provocateur, se cache le besoin de connaître certaines infos sur l'asso. En particulier, les coordonnées du Trésorier et les références du compte bancaire. Comme ça les adhérents n'auront plus besoin de râler, pourront faire des virements et le Trésorier

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Etienne Trimaille
Et voila :) http://openstreetmap.fr/adherer Le 10 février 2013 20:37, Jean-Francois Nifenecker jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net a écrit : Bonsoir, derrière l'objet un rien provocateur, se cache le besoin de connaître certaines infos sur l'asso. En particulier, les coordonnées du

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Le 10/02/2013 20:47, Etienne Trimaille a écrit : Et voila :) http://openstreetmap.fr/adherer :-)) -- Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Le 10/02/2013 20:47, Etienne Trimaille a écrit : Et voila :) http://openstreetmap.fr/adherer ok, mais je ne trouve pas les coordonnées bancaires :-P Ce serait bien de pouvoir faire des virements. -- Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux ___ Talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Etienne Trimaille
Ne te réjouis pas trop vite, je viens de voir qu'il n'y avait pas le rib, mais que les coordonnées de Jeff ;-) 2013/2/10 Jean-Francois Nifenecker jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net Le 10/02/2013 20:47, Etienne Trimaille a écrit : Et voila :) http://openstreetmap.fr/**adherer

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Le 10/02/2013 20:56, Etienne Trimaille a écrit : Ne te réjouis pas trop vite, je viens de voir qu'il n'y avait pas le rib, mais que les coordonnées de Jeff ;-) hé hé... -- Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Etienne Trimaille
Comme j'ai donné une mauvaise réponse, je me dois de rectifier : http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2012-February/040851.html PDF en bas de la page :) Le 10 février 2013 20:58, Jean-Francois Nifenecker jean-francois.nifenec...@laposte.net a écrit : Le 10/02/2013 20:56, Etienne

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jean-Francois Nifenecker
Le 10/02/2013 21:05, Etienne Trimaille a écrit : Comme j'ai donné une mauvaise réponse, je me dois de rectifier : http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2012-February/040851.html PDF en bas de la page :) \o/ - sur le site ? -- Jean-Francois Nifenecker, Bordeaux

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Import SIG-AEV

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Vincent de Chateau-Thierry
Bonsoir, Le 09/02/2013 22:29, Christian Quest a écrit : Pas d'objection pour moi. J'ai les shapefiles d'origine pour regarde si ça vaut le coup et comment intégrer ça à l'existant... Le 9 février 2013 22:05, Vincent de Chateau-Thierry v...@laposte.net a écrit : J'ai reconstitué le jeu de

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Philippe Verdy
Avant de publier ce RIB, t'es-tu assuré que ce compte ne permettait pas les virements en sens inverse (depuis ce compte vers un tiers) ? Sinon c'est risqué de publier ce RIB comme ça sur Internet ! A voir avec le Crédit Coopératif, car ce genre de compte publié pour recevoir de l'argent devrait

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mise en place d'un miroir OSM

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Philippe Verdy
Le 10 février 2013 13:44, Christophe Merlet red...@redfoxcenter.org a écrit : A part le fait que tu es complètement hors sujet dans ce fil de discussion, je suppose que tu t'es monté ton propre serveur de tuiles pour tester. Tu peux nous dire les perfs que tu obtiens pour comparer ? Usage

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Mise en place d'un miroir OSM

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Philippe Verdy
En plus mon serveur local n'a pas de table d'inodes puisque son stockage est sous Windows. Le tuning est tout à fait différent, même si c'est du RAID (que j'ai monté en stripes de 64 Ko classiques). Je n'ai pas encore tenté d'augmenter la taille des tuiles stockées (cela demanderait une modif du

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso OSM-FR : Je VEUX payer ma cotise !

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Jean-François Gaffard
N'ayant jamais eu d'accès en ligne à la banque il est difficile pour moi de suivre les virements et d'actualiser Galette. c'est pour cela que je n'ai pas diffusé le RIB tant que je n'avais d'accès pour suivre les mouvements. Jeff Le dimanche 10 février 2013 à 20:55 +0100, Jean-Francois

[OSM-talk-fr] D'une usine a stub proposed

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Ista Pouss
Bonjour, Je vous parle à propos de http://osm.org/go/0ApGprud2--, l'endroit nommé La Cartonnerie. Voici comment cet endroit était lorsque la google car y est passe : http://goo.gl/maps/XYSid Et voici comment l'endroit est en réalité aujourd'hui : http://flic.kr/p/dTZ5M1 ! J'ai passé les

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] D'une usine a stub proposed

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Cedric Viou
Bonjour, Je te propose une solution plus simple: - Tu regroupes les polygones (Outils/Joindre les zones superposées (Maj-J). - Tu le nettoies un peu (nœuds inutiles, ajuster les bords, ...) - et tu supprimes ou ajoute les tags qui vont bien sur le polygone. Ou alors, tu supprimes ce qui

Re: [OSM-ja] Post Import Cleanup of KSJ2 data?

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Satoshi IIDA
Hi, Thank you for mentioning, cleaning KSJ2 would be great as the other imports. Unfortunately, Bing coverage is not perfect at Japan. So it seems difficult to check all the waterlines. (rivers on mountain, culverts underground...) But we have permission to trace JP government data (Basic Map,

Re: [Talk-GB] Rights of way - LAs and OS

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 6 February 2013 21:43, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: In regards to public rights of way and the relationship between Local Authorities and Ordnance Survey, see my recent blog post: http://opendatauser.posterous.com/loacal-authorities-in-bed-with-the-ordnance-s I would be

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset 14828923 review

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Peter Dobratz
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:20 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote: ** ... Marsland Street (way 12700863) has many extraneous tags which are nonsense and can/should be removed: access, area, bridge, cutting, embankment, junction, oneway and tunnel, if not more. ... I believe the

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Kathleen Danielson
Out of curiosity, is asking someone to leave the project something that we have done before? I'm wondering what kind of precedents we've set for ourself. I am only vaguely familiar with the circumstances around this user being removed from the list, so I'm curious about the decision to ban someone

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Michal Migurski
I don't agree. NE2’s edits, most of all the route relations, are enormously valuable to OSM in the US. I'm not aware of any precedent for banning a user like this, and I'm not eager to see one set. -mike. --- michal migurski http://mike.teczno.com On Feb

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Richard Welty
On 2/10/13 8:56 AM, Michal Migurski wrote: I don't agree. NE2’s edits, most of all the route relations, are enormously valuable to OSM in the US. I'm not aware of any precedent for banning a user like this, and I'm not eager to see one set. i'm with mike. while i, like many, have butted heads

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Serge Wroclawski
This issue has come up before and the problem is that it falls through the cracks of OSM's governing bodies. The DWG often handles issues of vandalism or copyright violation, but NE2's edits are neither obvious vandalism, nor direct copyright violations as far as anyone can tell. But this type

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Serge Wroclawski
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Michal Migurski m...@teczno.com wrote: I don't agree. NE2’s edits, most of all the route relations, are enormously valuable to OSM in the US. I'm not aware of any precedent for banning a user like this, and I'm not eager to see one set. Mike, Your

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Michal Migurski
I'm familiar with his work and have run afoul of his views in the past, most recently when I performed a large scale edit to US route relation tags, some of which he did not agree with. I don't know if any were reverted. Nevertheless, I don't see the value in running him out on a rail without

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Randal Hale
+ 4 to what Mike said. What is the precedent from other bans? Is there a wiki page of bannination? Randy Randal Hale, GISP North River Geographic Systems, Inc http://www.northrivergeographic.com 423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com twitter:rjhale http://about.me/rjhale On 02/10/2013

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Anthony
I would suggest inviting him back on the mailing lists, with the knowledge that being banned from the mailing lists means being banned from OSM. This situation where he is allowed to edit, but he isn't allowed to join the mailing lists to discuss his edits, is an utter failure. On Sun, Feb 10,

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Russ Nelson
Michal Migurski writes: I'm familiar with his work and have run afoul of his views in the past, most recently when I performed a large scale edit to US route relation tags, some of which he did not agree with. I don't know if any were reverted. Nevertheless, I don't see the value in

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Serge Wroclawski
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: His malice is encapsulated in his inability to work with other people. Furthermore, he makes mass edits. There are not edits that one can accomplish simply by hand. He is doing many thousands of edits, and we have evidence

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Ian Dees
Hi all, This thread is getting unproductive and crossing into personal attacks. Please consider if talk-us is the best place to talk about one person behind essentially behind their back. If you feel there's a problem with a particular mapper please contact the mapper and the Data Working Group

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: Your information on NE2 is grossly inaccurate. NE2 makes very few positive edits, and many, many destructive ones, as well as previous threats to make more edits that conform with his (and only his) vision of the

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: His malice is encapsulated in his inability to work with other people. For example, I dislike a particular global modification to my work that he has made. I know that he has more spare time than me to pursue his ideas,

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Nathan Mills
On 2/10/2013 10:32 AM, Russ Nelson wrote: So I have resigned myself to allowing OSM to be a little bit worse because of him. How many other people have made the same decision? How much worse is OSM because of NE2? Does this outweigh his positive accomplishments? I don't think I'm the only

Re: [Talk-us] User pxptyrone's edits

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden andrzej zaborowski
Hi John, On 29 January 2013 03:21, the Old Topo Depot oldto...@novacell.com wrote: Message sent to user via osm messaging Have you had any success communicating with pxptyrone? If not then I think it makes sense to undelete the objects and tags that were removed by this user. Some of it was

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Richard Welty
NE2 asked me to share this diary entry with the list: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NE2/diary/18600 richard ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
So he's conveniently ignoring the left turn only arrow there preventing a straight-on movement? On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote: NE2 asked me to share this diary entry with the list:

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden James Mast
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 15:51:43 -0500 From: dygitulju...@gmail.com To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute At the risk of sounding like I'm defending NE2, one of Ian's points is that NE2 is banned from the list and that discussing this, here, does

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Mike N
On 2/10/2013 6:12 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: So he's conveniently ignoring the left turn only arrow there preventing a straight-on movement? I would just observe that the red line can be seen as a large version of the white left turn arrow above it.(Other than that, no opinion).

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Russ Nelson
Richard Welty writes: NE2 asked me to share this diary entry with the list: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/NE2/diary/18600 That's interesting, but I'll note three things: o the tire tracks with one exception turn left, and o the one set of tire tracks that goes

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
The question isn't whether or not it's popular. It's popular to drive the wrong way on one-way streets or left of the centerlines in Portland. But that doesn't make it legal. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:21 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.comwrote: Well, if you do look at the imagery, it

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Russ Nelson
I think that what he would say to the judge, when defending his traffic ticket in court, was that he *did* make a left ... and then a quick right. Since at no time did he move against the flow of traffic, he might prevail. There's a traffic light at that intersection, so it seems safe enough, if a

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
Looking through the making turns section of the Florida driver's manual, the maneuver NE2 proposes and the argument you're giving to explain it still doesn't work. You turn into the corresponding lane after a turn in Florida, no lane changes permitted in the intersection. You can only turn left

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
The same one. It also says to look at the diagram for examples, and shows turns into the nearest available lane. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: Heh, by the way, I just looked at the 2012 Florida Driver's Handbook (page 32). It explicitly says A left turn may

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Shawn K. Quinn
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 18:22 -0500, Russ Nelson wrote: The point behind turn restrictions is that a routing algorithm is going to be looking for them to create a route. And I think this is enough reason that the turn restriction should stay; I wouldn't want directions to include it and I doubt

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
Yes, because it also says not to change lanes. Also, it says you can only cross a solid lane line to avoid a hazard. I'm seeing more ways to interpret what's going on as not allowing the ramp-to-ramp movement than those allowing it to the point where you'd pretty much have to be making the

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Dale Puch
For the sake of the strength of the project, for the sake of due process, and for the sake of being able to defend any sort of ban or other action, NE2 must have his day in court. He (and those that may defend him) must be able to speak their minds. On the other hand, those the present situation

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Russ Nelson
Paul Johnson writes: Looking through the making turns section of the Florida driver's manual, the maneuver NE2 proposes and the argument you're giving to explain it still doesn't work. Mercy, Jesus, Mary, Mother of God!! I can't believe we're arguing the minutia of Florida traffic law here!

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Put the turn restriction back in. And NE2, if you're reading this? Leave it there. Done. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
Wait, what? It's clearly part of the same intersection. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Put the turn

[Talk-us] ref tags

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
Someone with local knowledge might want to look over the ref=* tags in Florida, a lot seem to be missing the context that let you know what network they're a part of. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute

2013-02-10 Diskussionsfäden Paul Johnson
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14989711 NE2 has ignored the discussion intentionally and reverted against consensus. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Put the turn