[Talk-it] Terminiamo la traduzione del Tasking Manager 3

Buongiorno, iniziamo con la buona notizia: il buon Paolo "Geofrizz" potrebbe riuscire a mettere in piedi in tempi ragionevoli il Tasking Manager aggiornato alla versione 3. Ha avuto accesso al vecchio server esportando il DB e forse si riuscirà anche a migrare sul nuovo senza perdere lo

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] mappa cartacea con dati OSM

On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 08:02, Maurizio Napolitano wrote: > È un po' borderline ma possibile > Unico dubbio è se prende uno "strato" di dati (esempio le fontanelle > dell'acqua) oppure se mescola e/o corregge > In questo ultimo caso credo che debba rilasciare le modifiche > concordo, se i layer

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Hello, Merci pour vos retours. Dans l'idée de préciser un cemerery=sector on peut en effet utiliser sector=military. Cela me parait compatible et cumulable avec religion=* si besoin, qui est le tag que j'utiliserai pour un carré musulman/juif ... Le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 à 21:47, OSMDoudou <

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] mappa cartacea con dati OSM

È un po' borderline ma possibile Unico dubbio è se prende uno "strato" di dati (esempio le fontanelle dell'acqua) oppure se mescola e/o corregge In questo ultimo caso credo che debba rilasciare le modifiche Io chiederei di scrivere tutte le fonti e cosa prendono In ogni caso una email al LWG di

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] mappa cartacea con dati OSM

Non ha importanza il nome della ditta. Dario Zontini Il giorno gio 24 gen 2019, 21:41 Michele Malfatti < michele.malfa...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > 4land o kompass? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 24 Jan 2019, at 21:37, Dario Zontini Gmail > wrote: > > > > Una nota ditta per cartine

Re: [talk-au] Announcing: OpenStreetCam competition

Hi all! Let me give you a status update on the OpenStreetCam competition. We have about a week to go before the $100 prize and two $25 prizes will be awarded to the most prolific OpenStreetCammers. If you have the app, you can pull up the leaderboard and get some idea of where you stand. The

Re: [talk-au] Our work in last two weeks

It sounds like one of those things where opinions are going to vary. Personally I would split them, but I don’t think it’s a big deal to do it one way or the other, and it doesn’t affect the map either way. Mapping to make some random QA tool happy doesn’t sound tenable to me. Horea (my

[OSM-talk-ie] Belfast meetup

We are delighted to announce, as part of our mission to bring OSM to the whole island, we will be having a mapping session in the QGIS department of Queens University Belfast. The event will happen on the 16th of Feb from 11 am to 3 pm. Just two hours on the motorway from Dublin! Hope to see some

Re: [Talk-it] il gatto che si morde la coda

Claudio, se capisco bene il tuo problema, penso che la risposta ai tuoi dubbi sia qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane In soldoni si tratta di mappare i parcheggi a bordo strada non come entità a se stanti, ma come attributi della strada. Ciao, Sergio On 2019-01-24

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Voir cette discussion récente sur les carrés confessionnels: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2018-December/091336.html.___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it-trentino] mappa cartacea con dati OSM

4land o kompass? Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Jan 2019, at 21:37, Dario Zontini Gmail wrote: > > Una nota ditta per cartine escursionistiche mi ha contattato per chiedere > collaborazione nel controllare la correttezza dei dati dei sentieri SAT della > mia sezione. Premetto che il risultato

[Talk-it] il gatto che si morde la coda

Salve ho un problema curioso Uso osmose per controllare quello che faccio e mi trovo in questa situazione Come mappare i parcheggi bordo strada? Se li mappo separati dalla strada osmose mi da errore Via di accesso al parcheggio mancante se ho un lato in comune mi dice che ho una sovapposizione

[Talk-it-trentino] mappa cartacea con dati OSM

Una nota ditta per cartine escursionistiche mi ha contattato per chiedere collaborazione nel controllare la correttezza dei dati dei sentieri SAT della mia sezione. Premetto che il risultato è molto bello, e nella mappa ci sono sia dati OSM e dati probabilmente proprietari. Mi hanno assicurato

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Bonsoir, L'idée du tag sector est intéressante. D'ailleurs, comment sont tagués les carrés musulmans/juifs/... dans les cimetières ? Avec "sector=XXX", aussi ? Francescu Le jeu. 24 janv. 2019 à 18:19, althio a écrit : > Une idée, ce serait : > cemetary = military > mais ça n'existe pas encore.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Status GRB-import tool ?

dat is inderdaad een van de workarounds, maar voor de een of andere reden bleef JOSM bij mij toch nog die tags doorsturen. Ik zal wel iets verkeerd gedaan hebben. m. On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:33 PM Jo wrote: > > Ik voel me ook niet geroepen om die rol op me te nemen, maar ik heb wel een >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Status GRB-import tool ?

Als er zo'n Meetup georganiseerd wordt, zal ik alleszins wel proberen om erbij te zijn. Jo On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 8:13 PM Marc Gemis wrote: > Hallo Denis, > > Ik had gehoopt dat iemand die dichter betrokken is bij de ontwikkeling > tijd zou hebben om je te beantwoorden, maar ze hebben het

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Status GRB-import tool ?

Ik voel me ook niet geroepen om die rol op me te nemen, maar ik heb wel een suggestie voor tags die niet mogen worden doorgestuurd. JOSM heeft daar ondersteuning voor. Wat ik gewoonlijk doe is zulke tags created_by of odbl noemen, aangezien die al in de lijst staan. De andere mogelijkheid is

Re: [Talk-de] Radverkehrsinfrastruktur / Lübecker Modell

Hallo Flo, das "Problem" mit bicycle=designated/yes ist leider so eine Sache. Einen eindeutigen Tag "Dieser Radweg ist benutzungspflichtig" gibt es leider immer noch nicht. Stattdessen wird versucht dies mit der Unterscheidung zu bicycle=yes (imo unzuverlässig) zu erreichen. (Und von mir

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Status GRB-import tool ?

Hallo Denis, Ik had gehoopt dat iemand die dichter betrokken is bij de ontwikkeling tijd zou hebben om je te beantwoorden, maar ze hebben het misschien te druk momenteel. Ik zal dan maar proberen te de situatie te schetsen: - de import mailing list had niet echt bezwaren, dus die hindernis is

Re: [Talk-ca] Place Tagging

On Jan 24, 2019, at 11:03 AM, Danny McDonald wrote: > A place does not need to incorporated to be a place=town, city, village. > That is not how it works anywhere in OSM - there are many unincorporated > places with these tags, worldwide. The tagging in Ottawa is a good guide, > with e.g.

Re: [Talk-ca] Place Tagging

A place does not need to incorporated to be a place=town, city, village. That is not how it works anywhere in OSM - there are many unincorporated places with these tags, worldwide. The tagging in Ottawa is a good guide, with e.g. Richmond a village, but e.g. Centretown and Stittsville

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Place Reclassification needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

I know in Quebec the place=village tag has been adopted to tag the municipalities other than town, cities and suburb, regardless of population. I think, but don’t know for sure, the main reason for this is actually the rendering engine(s). The place=village tag get a nice rendering that allow

Re: [Talk-ca] Place Tagging

On Jan 24, 2019, at 7:50 AM, Danny McDonald wrote: > My understanding of place tagging is that place=city, place=town, and > place=village are for distinct urban settlements, whether or not they are > separate municipalities. Correct, in that these tags can be placed upon a node, way or

[Talk-ca] Ongoing Place Reclassification needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

Repeating this, since it seemed to get bumped by all the building import talk. Now with a catchier subject line. DannyMcD My understanding of place tagging is that place=city, place=town, and place=village are for distinct urban settlements, whether or not they are separate municipalities.

Re: [Talk-ca] Canada Building imports wiki page

John, I mentioned several times in the various email threads that I planned to make substantial changes to the wiki. If you think something I added is a value judgment, I encourage you to point it out, on the wiki itself ideally. I think I've mostly been restructuring the page (without

[Talk-ca] Canada Building Import wiki page

Hi all, I just want to let everyone know that I moved the OSM wiki page for the Canadian building import, much discussed of late on this list. My hope is that this name is easier to search and more clearly conveys what we are trying to do. All history for the page is preserved and a

Re: [Talk-ca] Canada Building imports wiki page

On Jan 24, 2019, at 9:29 AM, john whelan wrote: > You seem to have made rather large changes without consultation including > changing the title of the project. You have also added some value judgments. > A number of people were involved in the original and it might have been nice > to

Re: [Talk-ca] Canada Building imports wiki page

You seem to have made rather large changes without consultation including changing the title of the project. You have also added some value judgments. A number of people were involved in the original and it might have been nice to consult with them before making such drastic changes. The word

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Une idée, ce serait : cemetary = military mais ça n'existe pas encore. Il y a une tentative polonaise de : cemetery:usage = war/military/family mais c'est confidentiel. Pourquoi non plus : cemetary = sector sector = military (ou cemetary:sector = military) On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 17:49, Florian

[Talk-ca] Fwd: Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

We're over the 40 k limit again so I trimmed it. I get the impression that just adding the building outline or even an approximation of a building outline adds value to the map. My own house has a cantilever on the back so the upper story extends beyond the basement outline. It also has a porch

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Le 24.01.19 à 17:48, Florian LAINEZ a écrit : > un carré militaire dans un cimetière : > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665897392 > Pour l'instant je l'ai taggué landuse=military en première impression, je trouvais cela correct : cette partie du cimetière est une conséquence de l’existence

[Talk-ca] Canada Building imports wiki page

Hi all, Just a heads up that I've moved the page documenting the plan to import buildings across Canada, much discussed on this list of late. The idea is that the new title is more concise, easily searchable, and clearly explains what we're trying to do. All page history has been preserved

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

That is incorrect, some building parts could be bigger if they are surrounding the building as an overhang etc. You can't assume building will be bigger On Thu., Jan. 24, 2019, 11:51 a.m. Nate Wessel Is it sufficient to tag fragments as building:part without indicating > which part or how many

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

>>It looks like perhaps we might just have to find the largest part for the footprint (building=yes) and any intersecting smaller buildings (building:part=yes). Yes, that's what I usually do. I also sometimes delete non-important building parts that don't add anything valuable to the map but only

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

Data is currently stored in OSM by mappers this way, regardless of the source. I don't think a height or which part is needed to use the building part tags. It provides the basis for later additions should a mapper be so inclined to add it. --- Kevin Farrugia On Thu., Jan. 24, 2019, 11:51

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

Is it sufficient to tag fragments as building:part without indicating which part or how many stories? If the data is properly structured, this seems like something that could be handled in preprocessing by checking for overlapping polygons. It looks like perhaps we might just have to find the

[OSM-talk-fr] Cimetière militaire

Hello, J'aimerai indiquer un carré militaire dans un cimetière : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665897392 Pour l'instant je l'ai taggué landuse=military mais je n'en suis pas très fier :P Je cherche le tag adéquat et n'ai pas trouvé. JOSM propose un preset "cimetière militaire" et rajoute

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

>they can be brought in from another source with better documentation / attribute tagging. (i.e. City of Toronto?) I understand The City of Toronto Open Data License has been submitted to the OSM Legal Working Group some time ago.  The Federal Government 2.0 license and the City of Ottawa

Re: [Talk-dk] Sammendrag af Talk-dk, Vol 114, Udgave 3

Uhadada. Jeg prøvede bare (naivt?) at trække de ca 4600 stednavne, GEUS kender/anvender, over til supplement af de 10-15-stykker, der (i hånden?) allerede er oprettet på OSM. Jeg blev ret glad da jeg opdagede, at måske 90% af alle koordinater var ganske nøjagtige med mange decimaler. Resten

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part It's not in the import wiki though since whoever wrote it didn't know about it at the time. Here's what I mean by mapping 3D features in our case. Say there is a residential tower on a podium. In the StatsCan data usually you would

Re: [Talk-ca] Ongoing Canadian building import needs to be stopped, possibly reverted

Hi Yaro, I just had a chance to look at the documentation on the source data and I wasn't able to find anything about 3D features or parts of buildings being mapped separately. Are you guessing here, or is there documentation on this? If so can you point us to it? In any case, the big

[Talk-ca] Place Tagging

My understanding of place tagging is that place=city, place=town, and place=village are for distinct urban settlements, whether or not they are separate municipalities. Place=suburb is for large parts of urban settlements (such as North York in Toronto, or Kanata in Ottawa). Whether to classify

Re: [Talk-dk] Sammendrag af Talk-dk, Vol 114, Udgave 3

Stednavne i Grønland er et både vanskeligt og følsomt emne. Der arbejdes på det i Grønland, af gode dygtigt folk i Oqaasileriffik og ditto hos Asiaq, så man skal være rigtigt meget sikker i sin sag for at second-guesse de officielle optegnelser. Bl.a. har en stor del af navneregisteret for

Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes

V tom případě to blbě je. Dalibor From: Marián Kyral [mailto:mky...@email.cz] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 2:01 PM To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Subject: Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes Jenže relace Praha není otagováná jako multipolygon (

[Diversity-talk] Fwd: Women Connect project launch!

Might be interesting to some On 17/01/2019 16:02, Rebecca Firth wrote: > [announcing new hot staff member] > This month we're also kicking off our Women Connect project! Whilst gender equality has been a focus for HOT over many years, this is our first explicit program working to include women

Re: [talk-cz] Hromadná editace/úkol pro všechny? Bylo: Seznam vodních ploch se špatnou kategoriií

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 13:18, Pavel Machek wrote: Ja porad nechapu co presne chcete menit. > > Co si pamatuju, tak rybnik nema mit natural=*, protoze neni tak uplne > prirodni, postavil ho clovek. > To ale (podle wiki

Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes

Jenže relace Praha není otagováná jako multipolygon ( https://www. openstreetmap.org/relation/439840 ). Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Dalibor Jelínek Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 24. 1. 2019 13:38:40 Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes "

Re: [Talk-GB] OS National Grid References

Thanks for your knowledgeable replies which reassure me that grid refs are not copyright, but the 1995 court case is still perplexing. My source was a news item from the Guardian and I can't find any accessible online source which has the legal argument and details of the case. Does anyone know

Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes

Neřekl bych. Relace multipolygon se na wiki bere jako plocha. Dalibor  Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Marián Kyral Date: 24/01/2019 13:15 (GMT+01:00) To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Subject: Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes Podle

Re: [talk-cz] Hromadná editace/úkol pro všechny? Bylo: Seznam vodních ploch se špatnou kategoriií

Ahoj! > K téhle záležitosti - nebylo by vhodné udělat hromadnou opravu, případně > nějakou akci přes task manager/poi importer? > > Možnosti: > >1. Tam, kde máme jak landuse=reservoir (vycházející z importu dibavod), >tak i natural=water, water=[pond,lake], jen vymazat

Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes

Podle wiki, by capital=yes mělo být buď na bodech nebo na plochách: https:// wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:capital Takže pokud je tento tag na relaci, tak je to špatně :-D Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: majka Komu: Jan Cibulka , OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 24.

Re: [Talk-it] pronto soccorso ospedali italiani

Ottimo lavoro Aury, attendo con ansia la pubblicazione  -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes

Ty chybějící capital=yes jsou na bodech. Takže podle mě to chce vzít rekurzí, tedy najít ty body , a pak najít hranici města okolo nich. Majka On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 10:34, Jan Cibulka ho...@datastory.cz wrote: Zdravím vespolek,

[talk-cz] Hlavni mesta - capital=yes

Zdravím vespolek, tušíte, zda je možný (pro účel exportu přes overpass) jednoznačně identifikovat hranice hlavního města? Jde mi to, že pokud se snažim vyexportovat hranice všech evropskejch hlavních měst [1] přes relation["capital"="yes"], tak dostanu např. Řím, Varšavu nebo Paříž, nikoli ale

Re: [Talk-de] Radverkehrsinfrastruktur / Lübecker Modell

Das ist ein langes Thema, mit dem auch ich mich rumschlage hier in Italien. Ich bastele schon eine Weile an einer Bicycle Wiki-Seite fuer Italien. Im Radbereich ist Europa noch fragmentierter als beim KFZ Verkehr. Hinzu kommt hier, dass die Rechtsgrundlage konfus ist und daher einfache Dinge wie