On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Martin Chalifoux via Talk-ca <
talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> What cities allow cycling on sidewalks anyway, seriously ? This sounds so
> inadequate. That it is tolerated is one thing, but outright legal or
> encouraged ? Makes no sense to me.
>
In the US
I just learned that US-based bike advocacy organization People for Bikes is
going to expand their "Bicycle Network Analysis" (BNA) to the following
Canadian cities: Toronto, Calgary, Winnipeg, Vancouver, Ottawa, Halifax,
Saskatoon, Edmonton, Montreal, Hamilton, Mississauga, Brampton.
What is the
Hi Martijn:
I just tried the challenge, and all of the first four tasks that came up
produce an "area too big" error in JOSM (long highways in very rural
areas). Is there any way to fix this? Or maybe warn people to not use JOSM
for this challenge?
Harald.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:37 AM Martijn
To me this is a clear case of something that doesn't belong in OSM. It
sounds like the boundaries aren't verifiable on the ground and may change
frequently. Therefore any data in OSM would go stale quickly and the only
verification of accuracy would be to go back to the source.
Yes, we have
See also:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:50 PM James wrote:
> http://saultstemarie.ca/
>
> thats how its written. even on signs to there
>
> On Feb 16, 2018 3:47 PM, "OSM Volunteer stevea"
I agree with your interpretation of the meaning of the lcn tag. I suspect
this may be a case of mapping for the renderer, where people want bike
lanes or other infrastructure to visibly show up on OpenCycleMap or
elsewhere.
Harald.
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 1:41 PM Mike Boos
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:56 PM john whelan wrote:
> Perhaps what we need is a way to tag cycle friendly streets. Typically
> I'll use a mixture of minor side streets and paths when using the trike.
>
> So I'd prefer a routing that used these as much as possible rather
There is a Montreal-specific listserv:
Harald (who no longer lives in Montreal)
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:38 AM James wrote:
> I think Pierre is a good contact for the local Montreal group.
>
> On Oct 24, 2017 11:02 PM, "Tim Elrick, Dr."
My question would be how the different levels of ferry are defined. What
makes a ferry a "trunk ferry" versus a "primary ferry"? Its speed?
Capacity? Not allowing pedestrians and bikes? My suspicion is that the
classification in the end comes down to which types of roads the ferry
connects, which
Hi Manohar:
It is my understanding that including destinations in the name is an
artifact of people tagging for the renderer (and/or tagging destinations at
a time before there was an established tagging scheme). If you search
through the talk-ca archives, you should be able to find some
A few things I can think of:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:13 PM Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
* Are there any Canada-specific mapping and tagging conventions?
- There seems to be a strong consensus that what elsewhere would be
highway=unclassified is highway=residential, no matter if the
A while ago I was also looking for a tag for this type of amenity but
couldn't find anything appropriate. I guess in a way they're a type of
leisure=playground -- so maybe tag them as that, plus some additional tag
(playground=...?) for the fact that they're a water-playground? Or maybe
coming up
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
It's commonly called a splash pad, but tag usage seems scattered.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=splash_pad#values
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splash_pad
If you look at the discussion page of the wikipedia
It sure is -- as long as the postal code is coming from an appropriate
source, e.g. a store receipt, a business's homepage, or your local
knowledge. Maybe a note about that fact could be added to the instructions.
Harald.
On Tue Dec 23 2014 at 10:01:50 AM Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com
On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 8:05:08 AM Adam Martin s.adam.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
It all depends on what you think the line that makes up the road itself on
the map represents. If it represents a type of land use tag, then the first
case makes sense as the land is residential in general, except for
Just delete and recreate. There have been several discussions on this list
about the data quality of the landuse data and if it should've been
imported in the first place (no data vs. bad data). Working with gigantic
multipolygons is indeed a pain and I don't think there is any value to
preserving
to some data)
or I guess (no data to PIA data? :-)
Andrew
aka CanvecImports.
aka I guess, one of the offenders :-)
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 09:25 -0500, Harald Kliems wrote:
Just delete and recreate. There have been several discussions on this
list about the data quality of the landuse data
Just to add to that: The question of coastline versus riverbank is not just
a mapping/geographical question, but also a technical one. Because of the
length and complexity of the coastline and the requirement to render it at
low zoom levels, there is special pre-processing for converting the
Hi Bernie,
I believe I looked into this a while ago and came to the conclusion that no
routing engine currently supports conditional access. It's possible that
this has changed in the meantime. But as there is an approved proposal you
should go ahead and add the proper tags, maybe in addition to
Since this phenomenon is not specific to Canada (see for example
http://www.messynessychic.com/2013/01/29/the-fake-townhouses-hiding-mystery-underground-portals/)
it might be a good idea to ask on the general tagging list. I quickly
looked up the examples mentioned in the article and didn't see
Hi Charles,
did you see the elevation profile feature on the Lonvia map? It only works
for properly defined trails that have exactly one start and one end point,
but in those cases it seems to do what you want it to. See for example here
Hi Charles,
last summer I messed around a bit with trying to get contour lines into my
homemade maps for my Garmin GPSr, using SRTM2OSM. Unfortunately, I
eventually gave up, as I wasn't proficient enough to in the end combine all
the data with mkgmap into one map. There are pretty good tutorials
I am happy to report that all of Canada should now be free of this issue! I
just fixed the last one all the way west in Saint John's. Yay!
Harald.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
Some updates on this issue:
I contacted Martijn a while ago
Hi everyone,
while working on the oneway issue on motorway junctions I noticed that
there are a lot of exits that lack a number (ref) and destination
(exit_to). You can roughly see the extent of the problem here:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/27T
Does anyone know of a source for this information
the
progress on the Overpass map.
Cheers,
Harald.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
So before contacting Martijn I want to be sure that we can properly
identify the potentially problematic ways. What we are looking for are ways
that match the following query
First the was the Overpass API, a powerful usable only by a few; then there
was Overpass Turbo, usable also by folks like me. And now there is a wizard
for Overpass Turbo, which should make the tool accessible to an even wider
audience: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/tyr_asd/diary/20548
Happy
I reverted the changeset and recreated the POI, hopefully at its proper
location. Probably not worth contacting the person, but maybe we should
keep an eye on him.
Harald.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19598209
Bonjour Diane,
there recently was a discussion of this topic on the OSM-legal list:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-About-CC-4-0-and-ODbl-td5779531.html
As per usual, the bottom line is maybe, or maybe not.
Harald.
2013/12/17 Diane Mercier diane.merc...@gmail.com
Bonjour,
Oops, this should have gone to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Bing
To: Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com
Oh no! I haven't seen any announcements and couldn't find anything
Yeah, I've been looking into that. I'm no Overpass pro either, though, but
should be able to come up with something. Bug me again in a couple days if
I don't :-)
Harald.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Connors, Bernie (SNB) bernie.conn...@snb.ca
wrote:
Richard,
What I would like
Okay, so I've done some digging. Unfortunately, the Overpass API does not
have a function to identify intersecting ways with a shared node. The only
way to find those would be do do an Overpass query for all the bridges and
then use javascript to identify the ways that share nodes. I lack the
:
The example I provided yesterday was not fixed. Most the exits having a
similar look along the trans-Canada Highway in Quebec are the same. I have
also found examples in Alberta and In BC.
Daniel
*From:* Harald Kliems [mailto:kli...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* November-26-13 10:04
*To:* Daniel Begin
Adam,
has this been a persistent error? I've also spent a while finding the
source of the disconnect and couldn't track it down. There seems to be a
random boundary somewhere on Cape Breton Island, but all the highways seem
to be connected. So I'm wondering if maybe the problem was a temporary one
Daniel,
if you look at the motorway_link page in the wiki (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Motorway_link) you'll see that by
default it implies oneway=yes. That would explain the behavior you
described.
Most motorway_link roads will be one way, and should be tagged
If you click on View Details you will get to this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28295454
I believe the problem is that the way is tagged as area=yes, despite not
being closed. And I guess in general it would make more sense to have the
city boundaries in a relation, not a way. I'm
Having biked across that border myself, I can attest that there are indeed
mean hills , but nothing quite as bad :-)
I suspect that OCM uses two different DEM sources for the US and Canada,
leading to wackiness neart the border.
Harald.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Daniel Begin
I think Daniel's email got cut off at the end :-)
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm not familiar with imports using Potlatch but importing it using JOSM is
quite easy - open the file, select the features, copy then in a new layer
and then upload the
there. Let's hope we have some locals to finish the work
there.
Alright, on to Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville.
Harald (who's currently in Toronto and marveling at OSM's data quality
downtown!)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
I've never done real Canvec imports
}}/!--this is auto-completed with the
current map view coordinates.--
/query
print mode=meta /
recurse type=down/
print mode=meta /
Pierre
--
*De :* Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com
*À :* Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com
*Cc :* talk-ca
Bruno,
thanks for this list! Something to do for me on those cold and rainy fall
days... Would it maybe make sense to make a cake with MapCraft to
coordinate the effort and avoid conflicts?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapCraft I've never set up a cake, only
used ones baked by others, but
Bruno,
in my experience the difference in offset is not the same everywhere in
Montreal. In my neighborhood (Pointe-Saint-Charles) it is only minimal, but
in other parts of the city I have noticed larger offsets -- though maybe
not as much as 17m, more in the 5m range. Which one is more accurate:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Larder Lake, Ontario completely missing
To: James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
I've quickly traced the basic street grid based on Bing and Geobase.
Improvements
Hi everyone,
I noticed that someone has damaged parts of the Lachine Canal in Montreal.
Between the Saint-Gabriel and the Rue des Seigneurs locks there is only the
waterway way and no longer the actual outline of the canal.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/45.4742/-73.5809
Unfortunately, I
Hi Guillaume,
my two cents: since this seems to be a feature that is pretty much unique
in Montreal, you'll probably have to come up with your own tagging. I would
not introduce a new tag on the service=* level, as these primarily still
appear to be alleys and a new tag on that level might break
Neat! Using only a rectangular bounding box probably wouldn't work
that well for Canada, though. Anybody know how to use a border
relation with Overpass in order to extract only data from Canada/a
province/a town?
Harald.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Colin McGregor colin.mc...@gmail.com
Side note: Looks like the Mapbox renderer uses an algorithm that
shortens common parts of street names, like Boulevard to Blvd or
Crescent to Cr. Which in Montreal leads to funny things like Rue
Cr and The Blvd...
Harald.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Fabian Rodriguez
magic...@member.fsf.org
OpenStreetBrowser offers routing and clickable POIs. Higher zoom levels
were experimentally implemented on a server by the French OSM community but
I think it is no longer online. I can't remember the URL, but you should be
able to find the related discussion in the archives of the general talk
You'll probably want one of those windshield suction mounts, something
like this
http://www.mountguys.com/Cup_Suction_Mount_for_Garmin_eTrex_Dakota_Oregon_p/mfx-wingn-11023.htm
(note that this is just a randomly googled one and I can't comment on
the quality). Because they need adjustability and
Looks very nice! But it's too bad that the bus lines/stops are not
displayed -- or do I just not see the option? And out of curiousity: is the
address search also OSM-powered? I'm assuming it isn't, as address data in
Montreal is rather incomplete in my experience.
Harald.
2013/6/20 Simon
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Fabian Rodriguez
magic...@member.fsf.org wrote:
It seems although the option is not visible, the default search for an
itinerary is for bus lines. *If you check metro/train* options, they
will be *added* in the itinerary calculation:
A lot of this was added and modified today by user ajk, who
unfortunately does not provide any comments on his/her changesets. So
maybe s/he deleted the highways in order to remap?
Cheers,
Harald.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:24 PM, ingalls nicholas.inga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey there,
I just
Much has already been said. A good tool to collect housenumbers on an
Android phone is keypadmapper:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/KeypadMapper
I've mostly mapped interpolation lines in my Montreal neighborhood.
The problem here is that each apartment has an individual housenumber,
meaning
Works fine for me on FF 20.0.1
Harald.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Stewart Russell scr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Fabian Rodriguez magic...@member.fsf.org
wrote:
First, thanks to Darryl and Richard for taking care of this!
I have one quick, easy (I assume), and probably non-controversial
suggestion: when I clicked on the link, I got a map of Europe, not
Canada. I know that this is only relevant for the first visit but
maybe it can be fixed anyway.
Best,
Pierre:
Isn't it exactly Richard's point that the fact that they're choosing
their own, non-standard licence means that we OSM contributors won't
be able to answer your question? We -- or at least most of us -- are
mappers, not IP lawyers. So maybe the licence is compatible, maybe
it's not.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Colin McGregor colin.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Broadcaster data is part of the public record, Industry Canada has
downloadable data here:
http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/smt-gst.nsf/eng/h_sf09484.html (at the
moment I don't have a machine that can deal with MapInfo
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Lastly, cadastral data is probably the least exciting type of data for OSM.
Other data like roads, addresses and even buildings is more useful.
Oh, I thought cadastral data would include building outlines? At least
that's the
Hey everyone,
I've just noticed that the Bing aerial imagery in my neighborhood has
changed. We used to have pretty good images but they were from 2007.
While doing some edits I noticed that the quality suddenly has gotten
much worse and looking at the tile info it now shows that the imagery
is
Oh, nevermind. This appears to depend on the zoom level. If you zoom
in further you still get the good 2006/2007 pictures. Nonetheless I
think the 2011 data must have been added fairly recently.
Harald.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I've
Maybe it would make sense to come up with a consensus of which tags
can be stripped. I know that for the US TIGER data JOSM automatically
removes the cruft when you edit a way, and we should have this for
Geobase/Canvec, too.
Harald.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of a filter in an editor, why not a osm-bot doing this job?
Well, actually it appears JOSM is already doing what I proposed:
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/7915
I'm not opposed to a bot but someone has to
Fabian,
maybe I'm misunderstanding what exactly you're looking for, but why
don't you use a service like http://www.GPSies.com to create the
routes and then embed the maps on the web page? GPSies offers several
OSM-based map layers (with MapQuest as the default).
If you already have gpx files for
-- désolé, en anglais seulement
I've recently started mapping bus stops and lines in my neighborhood.
After figuring out the not-that-easy public_transport schema, I've
encountered a problem: how to find out the name of a bus stop? Bus
stops in Montreal all have a unique, 5-digit number which is
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:48 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Look for a GTFS for Montreal file that will give you the numbers. Watch the
licensing though.
Ah, thanks, GTFS was they right keyword. But yeah, the license does
not appear to be compatible:
Personally I don't map sidewalks like that but I respect local
mappers' work and would not change this, as it isn't really wrong. I
don't think there's a strong consensus to map sidewalks merely as
attributes of the adjoining road, and there are a lot of problems with
that approach, too. E.g. how
Hi David:
May I ask why you think it's a good idea to add these to the OSM
database? I'm rather skeptical of imports of features that we have no
way of verifying on the ground (or otherwise). Yes, there are
exceptions to this rule, like municipal boundaries, but still. It's
great that Environment
Just saw this on the General discussion list:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Happy-New-Year-from-MapRoulette-tp5743713.html
After removing 7 routing problems in the US, Maproulette
connectivity error fixing has come to Canada!
Harald.
--
Please use encrypted communication whenever
I saw the coverage in the Gazette this morning and checked the border.
We indeed have border=disputed in the database, and it has been like
that for quite some time. Nominatim will return the island twice, one
with USA, one with Canada as the country.
Harald.
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 4:08 PM,
I'm normally car-less but will have a rental car over the holidays.
I'll try to take a detour across the new bridge then.
I also wanted to add more detailed tagging about the tolls but judging
from the wiki there doesn't appear to be an agreed upon system for
adding this information.
Another option to quickly find duplicate ways and routing errors is to
use the OSMInspector
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=routing_non_eulon=-75.82919lat=45.41720zoom=10
Harald.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote:
While uploading edits
From today's Gazette:
http://offislandgazette.com/news/story/2012/11/29/highway-30-will-open-dec-15/
We already have the route as highway=construction (
http://osm.org/go/cIo9hLV-- ) but maybe someone local with a car get a
GPS track soon after the opening and change the tags. I'm not quite
sure
Other things you could do: check if the Canvec data has been moved
after being imported. As I've said, Bing imagery can be improperly
aligned, but not everybody is aware of that. So it's possible that a
well-meaning mapper has moved the Canvec data to match the imagery.
Did you check your GPS
I've already said what I have to say about the issue at hand in
earlier discussion. A more lighthearted remark: whenever I feel
depressed about some Canvec-related issue I load up JOSM, pick a
random location in the US, and spend half an hour fixing TIGER data.
It's a very effective therapeutic...
I've run into similar issues. Street signs vary a lot, sometimes on the
same street, a good (and maybe extreme) example is Bord-du-Lac/Lakeshore on
the West Island. There are English-only signs: http://goo.gl/maps/Q4wQR ,
bilingual ones (that leave out the Drive in English)
Hi everyone,
I've done some OSMInspector debugging of areas around Montreal and
I've come across a number of newly imported natural=wetland areas,
sourced from Canvec 10. that are clearly wrong. This, for example,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.69514lon=-73.90455zoom=17layers=M
is a
Hi Pierre,
thanks for the response.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I dont know how you conclude that there is no wetlands around this area in
Laval. It is not sufficient to see houses around to conclude that there is
no wetland. These are often
http://www.montrealgazette.com/technology/all/Putting+North+Google+recruits+Northerners+help+with/7131985/story.html
(may be paywalled)
--
Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
Key-ID: 0x199DC50F
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Hi Paul,
did you ever get around to doing this? I was recently adding a bunch
of street names based on Geobase along the St. Lawrence between
Montreal and Quebec City and I noticed that there are still lots of
streets (and house number interpolations) with the double blanks. And
can somebody
That's indeed some nice imagery. In the area I looked at, the QC/NY
border south of Montreal, it doesn't extend all that far into Canada
but it's nice nonetheless. If you look at the list linked from the
wiki page ( http://cumulus.cr.usgs.gov/dispatches/PRODUCT_Orthos.html
) there don't seem to be
While browsing the map I noticed that the CFBs Borden and Meaford show
up on the standard Mapnik mak in very low zoom levels (z=6).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.28lon=-80.06zoom=6layers=M
The reason appears to be that they're tagged as place=city. According
to the wiki this tag should be
Yeah, I'm also not sure if I interpret the data correctly, but it
looks like nothing was deleted on the Montreal Island?? That would
seem rather suspicious to me -- or did I just miss a giant remapping
effort happening in the last few weeks (admittedly, I haven't been
doing much for OSM recently)?
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:13 AM, James Ewen ve6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Steve Roy st...@ssni.ca wrote:
What's the best way to be able to show there is a trail where the pipeline
is? Can I just add a highway/trail on top of the existing pipeline? Or?
Does the
On the talk-ca list there have been a few discussion about problems
with flooded areas in southern Quebec. The conclusion seems to be
that the problems are due to the rendering of the coastline which only
gets updated every once in a while. The two cases are:
*
Just to add to this:
in the Montreal area the alignment of the Bing imagery in my
experience is very good. It is nonetheless a good idea to always also
download the GPS tracks and make sure the images match those (and the
Canvec import data).
Harald (who has done a lot of aerial imagery-supported
Hi Andrew:
that's actually old flooding, visible only at certain zoom levels.
We've had a discussion about it a while ago
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2012-April/004674.html
Since the issue still persists I'll try and see if I can contact
anyone who will be able to fix it.
That's great news. Let's hope the accuracy of the new images will be
good. For checking the age of Bing imagery, see here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing#Age_of_the_aerial_pictures
No idea if this will work with the new images (and apparently it
wasn't all that accurate with the old ones
Hi Frank:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org wrote:
The triangle is probably caused by the shapefile which is used for rendering
the coastline at levels 9 and below. This shapefile isn't updated very
often. I believe it is a different one than the file used
In the link you sent it does render, but not at lower zoom levels.
I've manually set the tiles to dirty (see here
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slippy_Map#Mapnik_tile_rendering )
and that has fixed the issue (you might have to reload with Ctrl-F5 to
get rid of the cached image)
Best,
Harald.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Okay, so, u. Wow!
I've been looking around with the OSM Inspector to see how the license
clean up is progressing elsewhere.
I'm currently collecting some GPS data in preparation for fixing
Verdun which is the worst
2012/3/31 Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr:
Since I work more for developping tools, I am not as familliar as many of
you about re-mapping procedure.
I need clear ODBL Safe instructions on how to redraw areas like in Verdun
where large portions have to be redrawned. This morning, I was
Pierre:
Merci pour l'avis. I will retrace right away (just got back from a
ride along there).
Harald.
2012/3/31 Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr:
Avis aux cyclistes du Québec. À partir de minuit les chemins, nodes etc qui
ne sont pas sous la nouvelle licence ODBL disparaitront. Vérifiez
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:21 AM, James Ewen ve6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Gerald A geraldabli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a big supporter of imports, but if you are going to use them, you
should use and verify all of them, not just some bits. I'm not sure if there
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
highway=service with access=no or access=private then. Many service roads
aren't open to the public.
If the road is there and is a service road, it's mappable.
I'd like to add, though, that there is a problem with
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com wrote:
Access=no is rendered at lower zooms but when you look at the map for a trip
planning, you don't zoom that much!
I don't think that's an argument against tagging it with only
access=no. I do agree, however, that highways
Hi Daniel,
2012/2/25 Daniel Begin jfd...@hotmail.com:
Le problème est qu'il n'y a pas de construction sur la route. J'utilise ce
tag seulement lorsqu'il s'agit d'un vrai chantier...
For this reason, I still think that access=no is the cleanest
solution, no matter what mapnik renders. The only
We recently had a discussion on the talk-ca list about named railway
locations that had been tagged as railway=station (see this thread).
It was proposed to take the discussion to the tagging list in order to
come to a consensus that's consistent and in line with other
countries.
To quickly
From: James A. Treacy [tre...@debian.org], Monday, February 13, 2012 9:48 AM:
This begs the question: are there any reasons to merge areas like
wooded areas or lakes that are broken up?
I find the fine grid that shows up on Mapnik at lower zoom levels to be pretty
irritating (e.g.
Hi everyone,
I need help with a potential copyright infringement. I stumbled across this
user's edits today http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Gicl . S/he has primarily
added street names in St. Amable, but also adding a source=google. I've just
sent the user an email explaining the situation
It's a neat project. Does anybody know what the rules in regulations about this
are in Canada? Same as in the US? I know in Germany this would definitely not
fly (har har).
Best,
Harald.
From: Colin McGregor [colin.mc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
Okay, so the lanes=-1 is definitely wrong and I guess I'll just delete/correct
it whenever I come across the tag and hope over time it will get sorted out. I
guess aside from substitution with correct data, there's not much to be done
about the unpaved issue. Thank for the input.
Best,
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo