spelling for french (but i had never seen it before). Maybe we should change
> the tag and put it like that "name:fr=Kraainem" and "alt_name:fr= Crainhem" ?
>
> Le mar. 4 sept. 2018 à 20:43, Marc Gemis a écrit :
>>
>> I replied with the same names as per
Adams wrote:
>
> In the margin and without wishing to enter politics, allow me to insist
> we should name the village by its primary and original name "Kraainem".
>
>
> On 04/09/18 09:39, Marc Gemis wrote:
> > Here is the answer I gave on the note:
> >
>
Here is the answer I gave on the note:
As you can see on the map, the boundary between Woluwe-Saint-Pierre
and Crainhem runs slighty left of the Rue Longue.
Since the current implementation of Nominatim (the software that looks
up the addresses), always looks at the street and never at the POIs,
When you search for "blank" on Wikipedia, you will find some
disambiguation pages (a.o https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blank_space),
and finally end up on :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_(punctuation)
So space is correct.
m.
p.s. Do we need to ask people not to write in Dutch whenever they
is gebeurd.
Ik dacht dat ik dat een tijdje geleden al had aangepast, maar ik had
blijkbaar enkel de 2 andere tags vervangen door emergency=life_ring
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 2:17 PM Philippe Casteleyn
wrote:
>
> Ik zou
>
>
>
> weg laten.
>
> ___
>
isn't this just a variation on what3words [1] or Plus Codes from Google [2] ?
Why would you enforce an address string made from 26 strange
characters to people that might never have seen the English alphabet ?
m.
[1] https://what3words.com/
[2] https://plus.codes/
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:45
Microsoft gave talk on how they use OSM data in their Bing maps
product at SOTM 2018 the past weekend. See
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q602O9VGy3A (starts around minute 32)
They stressed a few times how great the Australian community is.
The video's will be cut in individual presentations
You asked the exact same question in April 2018 on the tagging mailing
list, not ?
I like the response Philip Barnes gave you back then:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-April/035662.html.
bleachers = open structures, without walls, grandstands with walls,
roofs and often
In case you didn't know, we still publish mapper of the month
interviews every month :-)
This time: Lionel Giard (Belgium).
en: http://www.osm.be/2018/07/13/en-motm-lionel_giard.html
fr: http://www.osm.be/2018/07/13/fr-motm-lionel_giard.html
nl:
> Compare that with the AND import of the Netherlands where the data was
> accurate and needed only minor fixing but where the bulk has just been
> untouched (except for adding metadata) and is still the base of the map
> in the Netherlands.
I hope you are not referring to the building import nor
dat is nochtans hoe het beschreven staat op de wiki :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:33 PM Wouter Hamelinck
wrote:
>
>
>> > Op zich is er geen reden om die weg te splitsen: die nodes met
>> > barrier=block zouden moeten volstaan voor
Volgens Richard Fairhurst worden blockades voorgesteld door nodes nu
wel ondersteund door OSRM and Graphhopper, zie commentaar van
"Richard" op mijn antwoord bij
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/64292/do-you-add-a-gate-by-node-on-a-way-or-by-adding-a-point-by-itself
De wereld staat dus
die tag is volgens mij enkele jaren geleden op deze mailing list besproken.
aangezien het zo goed als onmogelijk is om het archief te doorzoeken,
laat ik dat aan een ander over om die discussie terug te vinden. Omdat
er toen geen andere tags beschikbaar waren hebben we die tag
ingevoerd.
Tagging
int_ref only on way.
I think most motorways in Belgium where mapped correctly, before this change.
Perhaps a mistake of the user which selected ways and nodes before
adding/changing the int_ref ?
Feel free to reach out to the mapper that made the mistake.
regards
m.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 1:26
The Belgian community lives now mostly on Riot, we do have an IRC
bridge and different channels to discuss dev or landuse related stuff.
The main drawback is the lack of threads (ever tried to follow 2
discussions taking place at the same time, let alone read was said
during the day ?). The not
Both Andrew and the wiki say that you can only use ESRI World Imagery
(aka World Imagery map). You are not allowed to use anything else from
Esri.
m
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:38 AM, wrote:
> From: Andrew Harvey
> Sent: Monday, 4 June 2018 05:13
> To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re:
And of course you can use one of the mapcontrib "apps", e.g.
https://www.mapcontrib.xyz/t/8a9a5d-Eau_potable (or make your own)
regards
m
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
> The wiki page of amenity=drinking_water lists 2 apps:
> [1] https://play.google.com/st
The wiki page of amenity=drinking_water lists 2 apps:
[1] https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.bplaced.tapwater
[2] http://wetap.org/
I've never tried them.
m.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> I am looking for an application for Android displaying
>
This month we interviewed 2 Japanese mappers.
The first interview is can be found on the Belgian website [1]. The
Japanese version as a diary entry [2]. The second one will be publish
in the next couple of days.
I hope you enjoy reading it.
regards
m.
[1]
This month we interviewed 2 Japanese mappers.
The first interview is can be found on the Belgian website [1]. The
Japanese version as a diary entry [2]. The second one will be publish
in the next couple of days.
I hope you enjoy reading it.
regards
m.
[1]
Don't you think that Belgians like Jo and the rest of the Belgian
community know best what the default language is in a certain area ?
This can be a pretty sensitive topic, which is not always easy to
understand by outsiders. So please let the Belgian community decide
the default language without
https://www.mapcontrib.xyz/ has a number of dedicated "apps". Search
for bicycle on the home page.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> Is there anywhere an app for editing specifically bicycle infrastructure
> elements in OSM: bicycle paths, shared
e:
> W dniu 26.04.2018 o 14:49, Marc Gemis pisze:
>> The name for the country in the name tag is " België / Belgique / Belgien"
>> (*)
>> The name for any street in Brussels is either " - "
>> or " - " with the majority mapped with Fren
18 at 2:16 PM, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote:
> W dniu 26.04.2018 o 13:53, Marc Gemis pisze:
>> Do you now assume that names in region B outside city C have a
>> namehr;nameit in the name tag?
>
> Yes, unless stated otherwise for cities E, F and G.
>
> To be clear
I wonder why those arguments always pop up when we talk about separate
sidewalks and not when we talk about separate cycleways.
AFAIK it is common practice to map cycleways as separate ways in OSM
as soon as there is a kerb.
Don't we encounter the same problems in data processing for cycleways ?
FYI The unisex tag is also used as a shorthand for female=yes, male=yes on
shop=hairdresser [1] . Giving it another meaning on toilets might cause
extra confusion.
regards
m
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=hairdresser
Op di 24 apr. 2018 18:27 schreef Rory McCann
FYI The unisex tag is also used as a shorthand for female=yes, male=yes on
shop=hairdresser [1] . Giving it another meaning on toilets might cause
extra confusion.
regards
m
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=hairdresser
Op di 24 apr. 2018 18:27 schreef Rory McCann
2018-04-19 22:18 GMT+02:00 Jérôme Cornet :
> Bonjour à tous,
>
> en tant qu'ancien administrateur de liste de diffusion, je me permets de
> répondre sur la cause *probable* de ces problèmes.
>
> Le point commun c'est GMail (et d'autres fournisseurs d'emails similaires
> comme
the area used
>> for amenity=restaurant. maybe it should be the area for the dining room.
>> the wiki advice to put both tag to the same polygon look like wrong.
>>
>>
>> Le 18. 04. 18 à 11:56, Marc Gemis a écrit :
>> > o, I forgot, what about a restaurant that oc
o, I forgot, what about a restaurant that occupies multiple floors ?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The idea of using indoor mapping is good, and it's probably the future
> to solve all the problems you mention. (we had a similar discu
The idea of using indoor mapping is good, and it's probably the future
to solve all the problems you mention. (we had a similar discussion
last Friday on the Riot channel)
Some remarks:
- does it make sense for a "room" to have an house number and a street
? I would expect those on the building,
I guess this is the same person that started the thread
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62047 on the forum.
Andrew was so kind to give some feedback there. He invited the person
to join this mailing list.
regards
m
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Alex Sims
In dit geval zal het wel fout zijn, maar bij een rivierbedding die bv.
de helft van het jaar droog staat en dan als pad gebruikt wordt, denk
ik dat de combinatie wel kan.
m.
p.s. is er al iemand bezig met het terugdraaien + contacteren van de mapper ?
2018-04-12 1:06 GMT+02:00 Gerard
A lot of fuel stations can be use 24/7 with a bank card
-->
A lot of fuel stations can be used 24/7 with a bank card
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Hallo,
The more automated the conflation is done, the more strict the import
guidelines have to be followed.
There are a number of tools that come to my mind:
- JOSM with OpenData & Conflation plugins
- Glenn's tool for GRB building import might be adaptable for your use
- Ilya Zverik's
Je ne comprend pas quel lien vous utilisez:
https://www.openstreetmap.org, https://tiles.openstreetmap.org,
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org ?
Il y a 2 document qui donne des limites pour les serveurs d'
OpenStreetMap Foundation:
https://operations.osmfoundation.org/policies/tiles/ et
Did you contact the owner of the airfield to find out how they name it
? Did you find a sign along the street pointing to the airfield with a
name ? Is there a name sign at the entrance ? Is there an official
document from a government which mentions a name ?
If all of those questions return
I have confidence that the people behind the application know what
they do and I hope that a local chapter will be beneficial for
OpenStreetMap in Belgium.
regards
m.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:41 AM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> Martijn from the OpenStreetMap Foundation
Hallo,
es gibt auch http://unterkunftskarte.de/
m.
2018-03-27 8:07 GMT+02:00 lars lingner :
> Hallo,
>
> Ergänzend möchte ich auf die Overpass-API hinweisen. Ein Query für
> tourism=camp_site in Deutschland könnte so aussehen:
>
> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/xlQ
>
>
Feel free to take some slides of
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1IyyzXXyBWb6sO0U4Z5mROAmChKDPcaVCMa0ozG4h_q8/edit?usp=sharing
(I will try to make the presentation more consistent -- all black on white)
It might be hard to understand since I do not write notes under
slides, and avoid to
> Baby hatch sounds a horrible tag, sounds mechanical uncaring and impersonal.
> I assume it means a maternity ward?
It's called "vondelingenschuif" or "vondelingenluik" in Dutch, and the
exist nowadays: http://www.vondelingenluik.be/
It can be used by women that want to give away their babies
me ($COUNTRY), $THING is gendered for $GENDER",
> you basically have to just take their word for it, even if it doesn't make
> logical sense for you. So people can't really answer "Why?" It is because it
> is (in $COUNTRY).
>
> On 16/03/18 07:00, Marc Gemis wrote:
>>
Hallo,
I will not dispute the numbers in this article, but I do have some
questions on the data behind the numbers.
- Why is a bar considered a men-only place ? Can't it be a trendy
place for all kinds young people to enjoy a good night out ?
I have seen pubs mentioned in previous articles as
People use that to scan out-of-copyright maps and make them available
in editors.
Only useful for "old" things: such as historic boundaries, historic
buildings, etc.
The Irish community used that side to map all their historic boundaries.
regards
m
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Jakka
I know of at least 1 person that got banned from the tagging mailing
list for 2 weeks or so for using inappropriate language.
regards
m.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 20. Feb 2018, at 02:50, Kate Chapman
Is the R10 part of the LEZ ?
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:50 AM, joost schouppe wrote:
> Jo, that's right. The Antwerp one was supposed to be "everything within the
> ring road". But you need to put the infrastructure somewhere, and then the
> polygon needs to reflect that
The road properties are mapped on the road. The relation (also for
motorways) should not impose this. The E34-relation contains segments
with traffic signals, so it's not all freeway/motorway.
We should differentiate between fiets-o-strade-the-cycleway and
fiets-o-strade-the-route. The latter can
I would only map them if they are signposted. So if there are signs
indicating how you get from one dedicated fiets-o-strade section to
another via "regular" roads, no problem. If there are no signs, let
the router decide the route based on other tags.
As for the concrete that has to be placed on
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Rihards wrote:
> On 2018.01.31. 03:16, Albert Pundt wrote:
>> Yeah, that wasn't right of me... I've been using the other sources for a
>> bit now and it's really not as bad as I thought it was, plus there's
>> more of the old imagery still
One could use change:lanes to indicate that one cannot change lanes
over during those 200m.
Unfortunately no data consumer understands this tag yet.
As for the exact position of the split, there are several opinions, as
one can see from the comments on this [1] diary entry.
AFAIK, Belgium,The
I would try https://github.com/openstreetmap/Nominatim
Or contact lonvia directly
Recently she wrote a diary entry on upcoming changes in the handling
of postal codes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lonvia/diary/43143
regards
m.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:17 PM, SK53
possible tags:
lanes, lanes:forward, lanes:backward, change:lanes:forward,
change:lanes:backward
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/change
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:11 AM,
Lijkt op "BY-SA" , want "De bronvermelding moet gebeuren als volgt
‘Vlaamse Toeristische Organisaties’."
Dus moet je toelating zien te krijgen opdat vermelding op de OSM
website voldoende is.
m.
2018-01-22 19:38 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe :
> Hoi,
>
> Heeft iemand een
the last edit date of ways or relations are only updated when their
tags or the list of their members change. Not when the members in the
relation of way change location or tags.
So the error you describe is only 6 days old, and Vincent de Philly
wrote a changeset comment 5 days ago
> Unfortunately, the club tag still doesn't render, although it does at least
> display the name.
FYI Nominatim recognizes the club tag, so searching for clubs is possible
m
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
interpretations and findings from the ground lead to
> different tagging of R roads.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Gemis [mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 07:16
> To: OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re
I think
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways
gives the solution, there needs to be an F9 sign. If not, it is a
primary.
regards
m
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:24 AM, OSMDoudou
<19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you help
To answer how you have to map this, you first have to answer: what is
"Clintonpark" ?
- an area
- a collection of buildings ?
- a collection of identically named buildings ?
m.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Jakka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Every building with a different house
Oleksiy,
Is your planned tool similar to : http://tagfinder.herokuapp.com/ ?
m.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Oleksiy Muzalyev
wrote:
> I work on a tool to view a certain tag on the map for a non-programmer, for
> those who do not speak English (a language could
/$1515412099750267NwXZF:matrix.org
m.
2018-01-10 9:18 GMT+01:00 Jakka <vdmfrank...@gmail.com>:
> Vanaf waar kan ik deze herlezen in riot ?
> Ben aan scrollen geweest maar nie direct conversatie gevonden
>
>
>
> Op 9/01/2018 om 9:51 schreef Marc Gemis:
>>
>> (In Dutch as
(In Dutch as it is about the import of buildings in Flanders).
Gisteren was er een levendige discussie op het Matrix (aka Riot)
channel over de import.
Het ging hierbij om het volgende: momenteel zorgt de tool ervoor dat
je de gebouwen in JOSM krijgt met de building=house of de
building=shed tag.
Connaissez-vous https://www.mapcat.com ?
- OSM data
- clic gauche
- des noms en langue locale et Anglais.
m.
2018-01-02 23:32 GMT+01:00 marc marc :
> Bonsoir,
>
> Le 02. 01. 18 à 23:10, Cédric Frayssinet a écrit :
>> Quand on passe de GMaps à OpenStreetMap.org, je
It's listed on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
Just click on the "archive" link there to access it (read-only of
course) as a non OSMF member.
m.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Sérgio V. wrote:
> Of course I understand, and support, that sending emails
If you fill in "Coolidge Corner, Brookline, MA" on the nominatim
website, and run that query:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=Coolidge+Corner%2C+Brookline%2C+MA_geojson=1=
Then click details, you end on the page
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=498867
There
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Roads if you need
to contact some Wikidatians on adding roads.
m.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Jo wrote:
> If I understood correctly every single street name of the Netherlands is
> already in Wikidata.
>
> 2017-11-23
Hallo Nadia,
nice to hear that the fire department is using OSM.
As for the refs for the roads. There are a number of different systems
in place for reference numbers that you do not see.
In the UK they use official_ref or admin_ref [1]
In France they have e.g. ref:FR:FANTOIR
and there is also
to best do this yet. One solution would be to filter by challenge
> ‘centroids’ (simple), another would be to consider whatever challenge has at
> least one task within the current map bounds (harder). What would be your
> idea about this? Others with an opinion?
> --
> Martijn van
The possibility to work more locally. E.g. there is a project to add
missing roads in Belgium, I would really like to see only the "issues"
within let say 20km of my house (an arbitrary point I can set).
m.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hallo,
I'm escada, one of the people behind the "Mapper of the Month" interviews [1].
I've already tried to get an Australian mapper in the series, but the
people that I contacted preferred to stay anonymous, which is
perfectly fine for me.
So, if you want to participate or know someone with an
There was a proposal for this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/amenity%3Dreception_desk
but since people could not agree on amenity vs. tourism vs. office
during the voting process, it got rejected.
There is probably a lengthy discussion on the tagging mailing list
archive
> You can go to the overview of the challenge (what you call 'task', the
> collection of all wegenregister cases) by selecting the little 'cogs' on the
> top right and then click 'view challenge', then you get all the little task
> on one big map. This way you can select tasks in your area.
t's a driveway,
> but how's that different from what we've been doing all along based on
> imagery?
>
> If anyone else has questions, feel free! Also, don't map when you're not
> sure! It's better not to have data, compared to having bad useless data.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben
>
> On Tue, N
I've tried a couple of "tasks".
I found it pretty hard to fill in the proper road type without being
familiar with the local situation.
The fact that Wegenregister adds a name to each and every long drive
way is not going to help with the OSM data quality.
So I gave up and went back to processing
razed: moet demolished: zijn (zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:)
2017-11-13 7:58 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>:
> ik doe dat bij gebouwen, omdat er meer mensen zijn die zich daar mee bezig
> houden.
> Maar hoeveel mensen tekenen er nu power lin
enderd, maar de kans is 0 dat iemand ze opnieuw zou
> tekenen.
>
> Jo
>
> Op 13 november 2017 om 05:16 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>:
>
> Aangezien we enkel mappen wat nu zichtbaar is, zou ik opteren om alles te
>> verwijderen.
>> Er is dan wel een
Aangezien we enkel mappen wat nu zichtbaar is, zou ik opteren om alles te
verwijderen.
Er is dan wel een hele kleine kans dat iemand ze terug gaat intekenen aan
de hand van oude luchtfoto's.
m.
2017-11-12 17:52 GMT+01:00 Denis Verheyden :
> Dag iedereen,
>
>
> Een tijd
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02-Nov-17 08:58 PM, Tomas Straupis wrote:
>>
>> 2017-11-02 11:24 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis wrote:
>>>
>>> The current situation is not helping in producing useful maps. Too
>&g
The current situation is not helping in producing useful maps. Too
often I find myself in a residential area with large gardens and trees
when I expected to find a real forest based on what OSM is displaying.
So there is room for improvement.
I like the landcover=trees idea, but this does not
Please tell me where the wikipedia link is in e.g.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37344570 :-)
Wikidata does not have to be a bunch of links to wikipedia articles.
It has references to 2 external DBs (ODIS & Onroerend erfgoed), so it
should be considered notable.
I have no idea how many bad
AFAIK we hardly have any elevation data, i.e. building heights. OSM
does not store elevation data for landscape features (contour lines),
although we can put ele on mountain tops.
I've seen a few blog posts on using LiDAR for OSM, but can't remember
where. There was a presentation at a SOTM:
ds.
m.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> On 19/10/17 12:37, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> Then at least people know that they should not check with Nominatim.
>>
>> AFAIK, Nominatim does not try to generate an address you can put an
>
>
>
> On 2017-10-19 13:23, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> Maybe it is interesting to repeat how Nominatim resolves addresses,
> just in case someone wants to do a search after adding an address.
>
> - Nominatim starts from an address point (or building way with
> address). It
Maybe it is interesting to repeat how Nominatim resolves addresses,
just in case someone wants to do a search after adding an address.
- Nominatim starts from an address point (or building way with
address). It takes the house number from it and the street name.
- It tries to match the street
tip: iets ten westen en oosten van jouw staketsel, zijn er 2 meertjes in
een bos. Momenteel worden daar ook boompjes op getekend, omdat er geen
multi-polygoon gedefinieerd is voor het bos.
Heb je zin om dat te corrigeren ? Weet je hoe je een multi-polygoon moet
maken ? Vraag het anders maar, laat
A man_made=pier should be rendered on the default style, see e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22909776#map=18/51.08352/4.36580
Adding building is wrong. I don't know whether a pier mapped as an area
will show up though. Perhaps one could add area=yes.
Can you include a link to the Pier in
Hallo Pieter,
welkom op de mailing list.
Momenteel werkt Glenn Plas aan een tool (website), om het tekenen van
huizen met adres informatie te vereenvoudigen. De tool is grotendeels
klaar, maar omdat het hier gaat om het importeren van data uit een
andere databank, moet er een goedkeuring van de
I was thinking about possible changes to the tool that would make it a
useful tool for the community, and at the same time not violating any
policy.
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de> wrote:
> On Monday 16 October 2017, Marc Gemis wrote:
>> Wo
Would Yuri's tool be OK, if the proposed changes were limited to
objects that were created/last edited after survey to the person that
is using the tool ?
I was thinking of a scenario where people try to help with a
tag-renaming proposal.
Such a tool would be handy to help them locate all objects
I'm not sure whether it is a good idea to "copy" the address of a
house to another object, that does not really have that address.
As the original address information is "face 35-39 / tegenover 35-39",
the bicycle rental place should not have addr:housenumber=35-39 imho
m.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017
Wit respect to the "to-node", IMHO any node on the way that shows the
driving direction that is controlled is fine. So if the way to which
you want the add the enforcement relation is drawn from left to
right., any node right of the from node is fine. For a way drawn right
to left, any node to the
Does a tourist information sign indicates any access rights ? Is the
fact that a place is for rent indicates any access rights to the
driveway ? It can still be access=customers (or visitors, but we
don't have that).
m.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:58 AM, joost schouppe
> I think theoretically you could use QGIS and a stylesheet to make a pretty
> map from scratch, but haven't seen an example yet. And someone has been
> working for years on doing something similar in ArcGIS, and I don't think he
> released it yet.
If you mean Marc Boeringa, then no he hasn't
Do you know this
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~ligfietser/fiets/index.html?map=cycleways
map ? It shows a lot of cycleway tags, including surfaces, cycleway
routes and common mapping mistakes. There is nothing about shoulders,
but I'm pretty sure that you ask to include them (on the Dutch
? En de mensen van GR ook nog eens uitnodigen.
>
> Jo
>
> 2017-10-04 15:50 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Today I visited Tourism Pajottenland to explain OSM to them.
>>
>> Here's a brief summary of their plans. If you have contact wit
-- Doorgestuurd bericht --
Van: "Richard Fairhurst"
Datum: 4 okt. 2017 18:11
Onderwerp: [OSM-talk] Cycle network nodes and mountain passes
Aan:
Cc:
Hi all,
I've just added support for a couple more tags to cycle.travel's directions
Today I visited Tourism Pajottenland to explain OSM to them.
Here's a brief summary of their plans. If you have contact with
similar origanisations in your area, let me know. They will all have
to make the same inventory.
They have to make an inventory of all non-protected heritage items, be
it
> Wikipedia is based on secondary sources, it rejects original research.
> OSM is fundamentally different in that because it is based on
> verification by original research.
I'm trying to understand this.
If I noticed an inception date on a information sign next to a
building, is this original
> Another point is that if you have the outline for something that GNIS shows
> as a node, please conflate! I've done that with a lot of buildings and parks
> locally - just copy-and-paste the GNIS tags from the node to the polygon and
> then delete the node.
The utilsplugin2 [1] for JOSM and
I thought was always allowed to drive in the opposite direction under
Belgian law. What does not mean that a sign to remind car drivers is
welcome.
m.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 9:19 AM, marc marc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 29. 09. 17 à 22:42, eMerzh a écrit :
>>
cycleway=shared_lane
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Shared_cycle_lanes
note that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shared_lane
says nothing about any required legal status.
m.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:42 PM, eMerzh wrote:
> hi,
>
> i
101 - 200 of 1573 matches
Mail list logo