Re: [Talk-it] Curve di livello

2018-11-06 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
Ciao Michele, per risponderti, credo ci sia bisogno di qualche informazioni in più, in primis: dove la vuoi avere (su carta, su navigatore) e in che formato (raster, vettoriale)? Se ti accontenti di una mappa raster, hai provato dal portale OSM a selezionare il livello [1] "mappa ciclabile"?

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
ich habe nicht den Eindruck dass hier noch neues gesagt wurde in den letzten Mails, und habe weder meine Ansichten geändert noch bin ich zum Eindruck gelangt dass Du überzeugt hättest werden können. Nachdem mittlerweile mehrere andere Mapper wie Frederik, Simon und Mark ebenfalls

Re: [Talk-it] Attivazione Copernicus EMS per emergenza nelle montagne del Veneto, Trentino, Friuli-Venezia Giulia?

2018-11-06 Per discussione Alessandro Sarretta
Un mio piccolo aggiornamento sul tema: https://ilsarrett.wordpress.com/2018/11/07/copernicusems-and-flood-emergency-in-veneto-a-quick-contribution-and-feedback/ Copernicus EMS sta seguendo lo stream su Twitter (https://twitter.com/alesarrett/status/1060054126556577792) e vediamo se ci sono

[Talk-it] Curve di livello

2018-11-06 Per discussione Michele Malfatti
Ciao a tutti volevo sapere come posso avere una mappa Osm con le curve di livello. Io ora esporto la mappa nel formato desiderato dal sito e poi la modifico con Inkscape ma mi piacerebbe avere sotto le curve di livello. Grazie Sent from my iPhone ___

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione sepp1974
Moin, berechtigtes Interesse - "Berechtigt ist das wahrgenommene Interesse, wenn seine Schutzwürdigkeit von der Rechtsordnung anerkannt ist. Unerheblich ist, ob das Interesse öffentlicher oder privater, immaterieller oder vermögensrechtlicher Natur ist." eine von vielen in etwa

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
+1 Per evitare il panico iniziale basta disabilitare i menu e moduli più "spaventosi" :-) Il mar 6 nov 2018, 23:12 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 6. Nov 2018, at 13:04, Alfredo Gattai > wrote: > > > > Se hai a disposizione un gruppo di persone preparate alle

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Vivek Bansal
I told you Californians loved attention! I picked 6 Californias because I thought it was the nicest way to divide up the state into equally sized shapes with some reference to political boundaries. I also "detest" the politics of breaking up California but I like the geospatial organization. I

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Tod Fitch
> On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:58 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea > wrote: > > Taken "straight across the state" (west to east), following the political > boundaries of "the northern edges of three counties" (admin_level=6) to break > up a state (admin_level=4), it's both easy (technically, simply "10

Re: [talk-au] PSMA Administrative Boundaries

2018-11-06 Per discussione Joel H.
How are we with our import plan on the wiki, Do we have any blockers stopping the PSMA import? I think we should start setting dates state-by-state for import. ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Mark Obrembalski
Am 06.11.18 um 17:31 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de: Das berechtigte Interesse eines Verantwortlichen oder Dritten wird schwierig zu begründen. Nein. OSM hat das Ziel, eine allgemein benutzbare und hilfreiche Geodatenbank aufzubauen. Das _ist_ aber sowas von einem berechtigtem Interesse. Das

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Mark Obrembalski
Am 06.11.18 um 22:00 schrieb Hartwig Alpers: On 06.11.18 21:37, Mark Obrembalski wrote: Am 06.11.18 um 17:51 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de: Selbst wenn nach Art. 6 [1] e od. f eine legitime Möglichkeit gefunden werden würde, scheiterts doch ganz sicher an der Verpflichtung zur Information

Re: [Talk-us] Review named junction nodes

2018-11-06 Per discussione Harald Kliems
Yeah, this seems to be a PA Turnpike thing. The first Maproulette task I got was this https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xaK6JK7CzFYTEfkAp_kwtQ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/345383389 Harald. On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:39 PM Martijn van Exel wrote: > I found a case[0] where the name is

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 6. Nov 2018, at 15:40, Simon Poole wrote: > > Leute, die DSGVO hat viele Regelungen, gerade wenn es um die Begründung > von legitimen Interessen geht (Art 6.1(f)(, die verlangen das eine > Abwägung der Interessen (die eigenen Interessen gegen die des > Datensubjektes)

Re: [Talk-es] Importación de datos de los portales de Arganda (Madrid)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Santiago Crespo
Hola Pablo, Después de leer la licencia ODC-BY, entiendo que únicamente hace falta que el Ayuntamiento confirme oficialmente que les parece suficiente atribución el aparecer en la página de contribuidores [1] Tendrás que añadir una sección en esta página con un texto similar a: "Contiene

Re: [Talk-us] Review named junction nodes

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
I found a case[0] where the name is definitely legitimate, so I added a warning to double check with available street level imagery, plus an example to the challenge instructions. Martijn [0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33991781 , and see

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Like I said, I will leave it to the local mappers to figure out what is best. I did refine the instructions for the U.S. challenge a little more, since there are definitely legitimate uses of the `name` tag on junction nodes. I included an example. Have a look if you’re interested:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Aeroports

2018-11-06 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=13=44.3690=2.0270 Pourquoi pas mais : - ici ce n'est pas un aéroport mais un aérodrome. - il est affiché (la piste) - dans le coin c'est plus le nom de la ville qui manque - au zoom 15 c'est le nom de la piste qui apparaît. Les aéroports internationaux

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 6. Nov 2018, at 13:04, Alfredo Gattai wrote: > > Se hai a disposizione un gruppo di persone preparate alle quale puoi fare un > training intensivo ovviamente scegli un'editor potente, rapido e con pochi > controlli automatici che ovviamente non sara' particolarmente

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Je ne suis pas favorable à lancer une action MapRoulette. Cela ressemblerait à une opération pour imposer un schema OSM particulier, voire pour mieux contrôler le rendu sur la carte. J'ai modifié au cours des dernières années ces objets et les noms y sont revenus. Peut-être vaut-il mieux

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
Simon Poole wrote: > I think the question is less where N vs S California is but more if > there is a regional split of California that would make sense from a > processing pov. Is for example somebody likely to do something with a > North-CA extract, or if you would want to do something on a

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Joseph Eisenberg
Counties in California are very different in size and population. A few in the mountains have under 20,000 people and a rather small area. But Los Angeles county has 10 million people and covers a huge area. If 2 files become too big in a few years, it would be most useful to break up the states

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Simon Poole
Jumping in here slightly unwarranted, but what the heck :-). I think the question is less where N vs S California is but more if there is a regional split of California that would make sense from a processing pov. Is for example somebody likely to do something with a North-CA extract, or if you

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione sepp1974
Ganz richtig! Hinzu kommt, dass im Falle eines möglichen und berechtigten Widerspruches niemand ausschließen kann, dass der Datensatz nicht in Zukunft erneut erstellt werden kann. Zum einen fehlen hierfür die techn. Voraussetzungen, das zu unterbinden, zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das

[Talk-de] Kandidatur für den OSMF-Vorstand

2018-11-06 Per discussione Tobias Knerr
Hallo zusammen, ich habe dieses Wochenende erfahren, dass Peda (Peter Barth) aus dem Vorstand der OSMF ausscheiden und nicht erneut kandidieren wird. Peda hat aus meiner Sicht einiges erreicht, was das reibungslose Funktionieren unseres Projekts, die Transparenz der Arbeit des Boards (z.B. durch

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione sepp1974
Mark, es geht um den Datensatz des Betreibers/Opperators, nicht um den Firmennamen oder Namen bspw. der Praxis - das ist soweit geklärt denke ich, selbst wenn der (Prixis-)Name, den Namen des Arztes enthält. "Augenarztpraxis Dr. Sommer" ist kein personenbezogener Datensatz sondern Eigenname

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Francesco Pelullo
Il giorno lun 5 nov 2018, 23:21 Luca Delucchi ha scritto: > > > Riguardo al formato voto per lo Shapefile, abbastanza comodo per essere > importato con il plugin Open Data. > > per ora dello shapefile non ce n'è bisogno visto che le tracce non > hanno informazioni alfanumeriche, comunque puoi

[OSM-talk-fr] Aeroports

2018-11-06 Per discussione denis .
Bonsoir, je demande avec un grand sourire que le rendu des aéroports soient complété. notamment en z13 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321002405#map=13/44.3690/2.0270 mais absent sur osm-fr Merci. Bonne soirée / journée.. ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Hartwig Alpers
On 06.11.18 21:37, Mark Obrembalski wrote: Am 06.11.18 um 17:51 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de: Selbst wenn nach Art. 6 [1] e od. f eine legitime Möglichkeit gefunden werden würde, scheiterts doch ganz sicher an der Verpflichtung zur Information nach Art. 14. Diese Verpflichtung besteht ja

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet du mois de novembre: gendarmerie/police

2018-11-06 Per discussione Cédric Frayssinet
Bonsoir, Comment sont gérées les épingles ? En effet, hier, j'ai rajouté de nombreuses gendarmeries dans ce secteur : https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=8191=500=3=11=44.3626=2.4478== ; et j'ai donc cliqué sur le bouton vert pour les faire disparaître. Aujourd'hui, ces épingles sont

[Talk-us] Proposed building import in Hamilton County, Ohio

2018-11-06 Per discussione Nate Wessel
Below is a link to a proposed import for building footprints (with some address tags, height info, etc.) in Hamilton County Ohio. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hamilton_County_Building_Import We've been planning this on the OSM Ohio slack channel, but I figured I should reach out here

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Volker Schmidt
Secondo delle discussioni in lista talk-it le mappe IGM 25000 da anni o addirutara da decenni non vengono più aggiornate. Vedi http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it del 2013 oggetto: [Talk-it] IGM su Josm (Non ho controllato personalmente) Volker On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 13:54, Max wrote:

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Mark Obrembalski
Am 06.11.18 um 17:51 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de: Selbst wenn nach Art. 6 [1] e od. f eine legitime Möglichkeit gefunden werden würde, scheiterts doch ganz sicher an der Verpflichtung zur Information nach Art. 14. Diese Verpflichtung besteht ja nach Art. 14 Abs. 5 Buchst. b) gerade nicht,

[Talk-us] Review named junction nodes

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Hi, I created a MapRoulette challenge to review named junction nodes. Since named junctions are very uncommon, most of these should probably be edited. There’s only a few hundred of them so we should be able to review these together pretty quickly.

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione L. David Baron
As another Californian (from the SF Bay Area) with some amount of opinion here, I suppose I'll chime in. The straight-ish line (northern boundaries of San Luis Obispo, Kern, and San Bernardino counties) seems largely reasonable to me as a possible North/South two-way split. (Other possible

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ajout d'aménagements cyclable avec StreetComplete

2018-11-06 Per discussione Antoine Riche
Le 05/11/2018 à 12:29, marc marc a écrit : Le 05. 11. 18 à 11:35, Axelos a écrit : identifier les doublons c'est bien cela le soucis. il faudrait un tag genre cycleway=separate qui indique que cet élément est déjà renseigné mais par un autre objet à la manière de sidewalk=separate

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables

2018-11-06 Per discussione Jo
Indeed, a mapper who wants to add this and who can't find the information on the internet or in a booklet, would have travel to the first stop, take note of all the departure times and then establish the deltas between all the stops of the itinerary. If that's the case, such a mapper would

Re: [Talk-es] Estilos de representación cartográfica para la revisión de edificios y direcciones

2018-11-06 Per discussione Jorge Sanz Sanfructuoso
El de los tipos de edificios no lo conocía. Muy útil. Lo único la url que has puesto de la traducción no me funciona. He usado esta otra https://josm.openstreetmap.de/josmfile?page=Es:Styles/Coloured_buildings Gracias por la información El dom., 4 nov. 2018 a las 18:19, Javier Sánchez Portero

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
I did create a MapRoulette challenge to review these named junction nodes for the United States just now. See https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3253/task/5881462 . If you find it useful I’d be happy to create one for Canada as well.

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Andrew Lester
I just cleaned up a handful of junctions in the western provinces where refs were in the name tag, destination was in the name on the junction in addition to the link way, etc. Running an Overpass query for all of Canada (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/DrL) now shows that there are almost 2000 of

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables

2018-11-06 Per discussione Jo
Yes, very hard to debug and we already established some change every few months. So after a change from the operator. One traveler will update one of those schedules, Another may do so for 3 stops down the line, in the mean time the stops in between and after are not updated yet. A maintenance

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OsmAnd, un navigateur routier un peu à part

2018-11-06 Per discussione gnrc
J'ai la version G-Play limitée à 7 téléchargements et cela fonctionne. Le dossier de rangement des cartes est parfois difficile à trouver sur le tel, car il peut être dans /android/dat/net.osmand/files ou ailleurs... mais on peux aussi personnaliser cet emplacement dans les préférences. -

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
Between "out meta;" and "out meta qt;" there should be a >; but sometimes this gets mangled. Entre "out meta;" et "out meta qt;" il devrait y avoir un >; mais parfois cela est mutilé. So, I'm choosing to share an "OT share link:" Donc, je choisis de partager un "lien de partage OT:"

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
On Nov 6, 2018, at 8:08 AM, Pierre Béland wrote: > Petit test rapide avec Overpass. J'observe que les clés suivantes sont > utilisées > highway=service > service=emergency_access > access=no > exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19692719 > > La Requête Overpass ci-dessous avec paramètre

Re: [Talk-transit] [Tagging] Public Transport Timetables

2018-11-06 Per discussione Jo
If you have a single one for a stop/route pair, no problem. As soon as you have a few hundred and the information in them starts to conflict with other another timetable relation for the same route it will be extremely hard to figure out where it went wrong. Polyglot Op di 6 nov. 2018 om 17:08

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
Bradley White wrote: > I would suggest splitting into North & South along the northern edge > of the SLO/Kern/San Bernardino county lines as the first step; this > will at least split the LA and SF Bay areas into separate files, both > of which I assume account for a significant portion of CA's

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Joseph Eisenberg
Northern and Southern California would work; make the split along the county boundaries just north of Bakersfield, which conveniently follow one line of latitude. It would also be possible to split the State into Northern, Central and Southern regions, but this would be harder to define. Joseph

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione OSM Volunteer stevea
On Nov 6, 2018,at 12:38:05 AM PST, Frederik Ramm wrote: > ...on the Geofabrik download server, we usually split up countries into > sub-regions once their single .osm.pbf has gone over a certain size. The > aim is to make it easy for people to work with data just for their > region, even on

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OsmAnd, un navigateur routier un peu à part

2018-11-06 Per discussione Rpnpif
Le 5 novembre 2018, Christian Rogel a écrit : > Publication sur osm.fr ? Très volontiers, après correctifs éventuels. > Justement, j’ai compris, lors de ma recherche, qu’un mise à jour compte comme > une carte et est doncsusceptible d’être payante. > Quelqu’un peut-il confirmer ou infirmer ? >

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione sepp1974
Simon, ist alles nachvollziehbar. Es ist sogar davon auszugehen, dass der Firmeninhaber der OSM wahrscheinlich gar nicht bewußt kennt, positiv überrascht sein wird, dort eine für ihn kostenlose Wegbeschreibung zum eigenen Laden zu haben. Bis der erste Anwalt mit Abmahnung aufgrund fehlender

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OsmAnd, un navigateur routier un peu à part

2018-11-06 Per discussione Jean-Claude Repetto
Le 06/11/2018 à 16:45, g...@laposte.net a écrit : > Bonjour, > Savez vous que l'extracteur de carte https://extract.bbbike.org/ permet > d'extraire des portion de carte de planet.osm sous différents formats, > dont celui de OsmAnd (faire choix format : Android OsmAnd .OBF). > Il suffit de mettre

Re: [Talk-br] Cedência dos dados de cartografia da IPPUC de Curitiba / Importação de numeração predial

2018-11-06 Per discussione Fernando Trebien
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM santamariense wrote: > O reposicionamento do centroide > para junto dos logradouros será feito antes de se enviar ao OSM. Ah ok então. É bastante trabalho, mas de fato é o ideal. -- Fernando Trebien ___ Talk-br

Re: [Talk-it] Import civici Milano - regole di traduzione

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 6. Nov 2018, at 14:52, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:46 PM Paolo Monegato < >> gato.selvad...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Il 31/10/2018 15:49, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: Se incontriamo con la conflation dei civici già mappati ma soppressi, cosa

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione sepp1974
Das berechtigte Interesse eines Verantwortlichen oder Dritten wird schwierig zu begründen. Das setzt ja voraus, dass irgendetwas passiert ist, dass ein Interesse als solches im konkreten Fall besteht. (Art. 6 f) in dem Fall wäre OSM definitiv der falsche Ansprechpartner. Art. 6 [1] e, 2.

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Petit test rapide avec Overpass. J'observe que les clés suivantes sont utiliséeshighway=serviceservice=emergency_accessaccess=noexemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19692719 La Requête Overpass ci-dessous avec paramètre around, détecte les voies de service à proximité d'autoroutes sans clé

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
So apparently this is pretty common practice in Quebec. There are 755 junction nodes that have name tags. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Dr9. Other provinces don't have nearly that many. The user breakdown for latest edit on those nodes doesn't really surface one mapper who consistently

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OsmAnd, un navigateur routier un peu à part

2018-11-06 Per discussione gnrc
Bonjour, Savez vous que l'extracteur de carte https://extract.bbbike.org/ permet d'extraire des portion de carte de planet.osm sous différents formats, dont celui de OsmAnd (faire choix format : Android OsmAnd .OBF). Il suffit de mettre ce fichier dans le dossier Osmand de son smartphone pour

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Is there an Overpass or other query that could detect all these situations? I could make a MapRoulette challenge out of them so we can look at them together and remove the name on nodes where it's not appropriate / redundant. I'll ask on IRC as well.. I am not that much of an expert in

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OsmAnd, un navigateur routier un peu à part

2018-11-06 Per discussione rainerU
Am 06.11.18 um 07:48 schrieb Stéphane Péneau: > Je l'ai utilisé pour un cas précis il y a quelques mois, j'en parle un peu > ici : > http://www.stemani.fr/index.php?post/2018/02/25/Integrer-rapidement-les-parcelles-cadastrales-dans-OsmAnd J'avais utilisé MapCreator pour générer un fichier OBF

Re: [Talk-at] Gesprächskultur (war: Werde Teil der OpenStreeetMap Familie)

2018-11-06 Per discussione grubernd
On 06.11.18 15:46, emga wrote: > Es steht der Mailinglisten Administration frei den „Ban Hammer“ herauszuholen. aber geh, so eine Mailinglist verträgt das leicht, ein Trotzbua mehr oder weniger ist da doch egal. sage ich jetzt ganz salopp als gewöhnliches Mitglied dieser Ansammlung

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Greg Troxel
Luis Villa writes: >> My guess is the only split that the majority in the state would instantly >> recognize would be “Northern California” and “Southern California”. However >> exactly where that split occurs is likely to be contested. :) >> >> Were I to hazard a guess, I would start on the

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Mark Obrembalski
Am 06.11.18 um 07:19 schrieb sepp1...@posteo.de: Yep, der Text zur DS-GVO ist dort ziemlich eindeutig. OSM kann weder die Grundsätze nach Art. 5 umsetzen, noch bspw. die Informationspflichten gem. Art. 13, bzw. 14. Eine Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten erfolgt, sobald ich diese innerhalb

Re: [Talk-at] Gesprächskultur (war: Werde Teil der OpenStreeetMap Familie)

2018-11-06 Per discussione gppes_osm
Hallo grubernd, schoen von Dir zu hoeren, schreibst auch mal wieder was im befreundschafteten AT-Forum? ;-) Johann wird sich ins Faeustchen laecheln, wenn er sich anschaut, was er mit seinem gekonnt formulierten Zuendel-Email erreicht hat... Und zu Volki: Er diskutiert wie bei einem

Re: [Talk-at] Gesprächskultur (war: Werde Teil der OpenStreeetMap Familie)

2018-11-06 Per discussione emga
> Am 06.11.2018 um 15:24 schrieb grubernd : > > On 05.11.18 22:13, emga wrote: >> Und ich steh nicht darauf wenn man aus einer Diskussion dann privat herum >> schreibt, entweder öffentlich oder gar nicht. >> Wenn du mit meiner Arbeit nicht zufrieden bist oder etwas ändern möchtest >> kannst du

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Bradley White
> 3. what would be a sensible way to split California - in 58 counties, or > maybe just go with SoCal and NorCal for now? I would suggest splitting into North & South along the northern edge of the SLO/Kern/San Bernardino county lines as the first step; this will at least split the LA and SF Bay

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Simon Poole
Leute, die DSGVO hat viele Regelungen, gerade wenn es um die Begründung von legitimen Interessen geht (Art 6.1(f)(, die verlangen das eine Abwägung der Interessen (die eigenen Interessen gegen die des Datensubjektes) stattfinden.  Sprich es hängt halt am Schluss von diesen Abwägungen ab ob wir

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big :)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Brian M Hamlin
Hi OSM US List -   California native and current resident here -- while implementing California urban planning analysis a few years ago,  we used a grouping based on the transportation governance here. The grouping is shown graphically in a blog post [0]     CA Landuse is governed at the county

Re: [Talk-cz] Nefunkční taginfo

2018-11-06 Per discussione Tom Ka
Tak snad jo, prosim o otestovani jestli jsem na neco nezapomel. Diky út 6. 11. 2018 v 14:04 odesílatel Tom Ka napsal: > > út 6. 11. 2018 v 6:32 odesílatel Marián Kyral napsal: > > Tak hlásím, že opraveno, ale bude nějakou pár hodin trvat, než se > > zneplatní keše a změna se dostane opravdu

[Talk-at] Gesprächskultur (war: Werde Teil der OpenStreeetMap Familie)

2018-11-06 Per discussione grubernd
On 05.11.18 22:13, emga wrote: Und ich steh nicht darauf wenn man aus einer Diskussion dann privat herum schreibt, entweder öffentlich oder gar nicht. Wenn du mit meiner Arbeit nicht zufrieden bist oder etwas ändern möchtest kannst du es gerne öffentlich mitteilen bzw. auch selbst mitwirken,

Re: [Talk-at] Fwd: Werde Teil der OpenStreeetMap Familie

2018-11-06 Per discussione Friedrich Volkmann
On 06.11.2018 14:32, emga wrote: Am 06.11.2018 um 14:22 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann : Wie auch immer, dir ist mittlerweile hoffentlich klar, dass ein allgemeiner Informationspost nicht ins Österreich-Forum hineingehört. Sonst könnte der nächste einen Beitrag "rettet die Wale" hineinstellen,

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Luis Villa
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:59 AM Tod Fitch wrote: > > For background, I a 40 year resident of California and have lived, worked > and/or performed volunteer work in five of the “six Californias”. At > present I live in Orange County (part of the Six California’s “South > California” and perform

Re: [Talk-es] Fwd: Reconocimiento IGN en OSM

2018-11-06 Per discussione Miguel Sevilla-Callejo
Hola a todos de nuevo, Escribo para retomar el tema del reconocimiento de los datos del IGN en la página de OSM. Os comento que el tema centró buena parte de la reunión que tuvimos el pasado día 20 de octubre en la Geocamp [0] y a ver si vamos avanzando a pues falta de haber enviado un resumen

Re: [Talk-it] Import civici Milano - regole di traduzione

2018-11-06 Per discussione Paolo Monegato
Il 06/11/2018 14:52, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:46 PM Paolo Monegato mailto:gato.selvad...@gmail.com>> wrote: Il 31/10/2018 15:49, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: Se incontriamo con la conflation dei civici già mappati ma soppressi, cosa si fa?

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Tod Fitch
> On Nov 6, 2018, at 5:23 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Tod, > > generally, the Geofabrik OSM PBF extracts are available across the size > spectrum from continent to smallest extract, so the California OSM PBF > extract will not go away (sorry if I was unclear about that). > > But my

Re: [Talk-br] Cedência dos dados de cartografia da IPPUC de Curitiba / Importação de numeração predial

2018-11-06 Per discussione Peter Krauss
Oi gente, respondendo inline ao @santamariense e já imaginando como seria consolidar a atual discussão no Talk da Wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Curitiba/Importa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_IPPUC On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM santamariense wrote: > Obrigado pessoal pelo feedback. Fiz na

Re: [Talk-it] Import civici Milano - regole di traduzione

2018-11-06 Per discussione Andrea Musuruane
Ciao, On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 2:46 PM Paolo Monegato wrote: > Il 31/10/2018 15:49, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: > > Se incontriamo con la conflation dei civici già mappati ma soppressi, cosa >> si fa? >> > > Elimini i civici perché non esistono più. > > Non sarebbe più opportuno anteporre un

Re: [Talk-it] Import civici Milano - regole di traduzione

2018-11-06 Per discussione Paolo Monegato
Il 31/10/2018 15:49, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: Se incontriamo con la conflation dei civici già mappati ma soppressi, cosa si fa? Elimini i civici perché non esistono più. Non sarebbe più opportuno anteporre un lifecycle prefix (removed, ad esempio) per conservare la storia?

Re: [Talk-at] Fwd: Werde Teil der OpenStreeetMap Familie

2018-11-06 Per discussione emga
> Am 06.11.2018 um 14:22 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann : > > > Wie auch immer, dir ist mittlerweile hoffentlich klar, dass ein allgemeiner > Informationspost nicht ins Österreich-Forum hineingehört. Sonst könnte der > nächste einen Beitrag "rettet die Wale" hineinstellen, weil das ja ebenso ein

[Talk-br] OSM Foundation e comunidade latina

2018-11-06 Per discussione Wille
A próxima eleição para o board da OSM Foundation será em 15 de Dezembro. Quem deseja participar da votação, deve se registrar como membro da Fundação até o dia 15 de novembro: https://join.osmfoundation.org/ Consegui articular uma conversa entre membros do atual board da OSM Foundation e a

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Tod, generally, the Geofabrik OSM PBF extracts are available across the size spectrum from continent to smallest extract, so the California OSM PBF extract will not go away (sorry if I was unclear about that). But my assumption was that there might be a need for smaller files because the

[talk-latam] OSM Foundation y comunidad Latam

2018-11-06 Per discussione Wille
La próxima elección de la OSM Foundation será en 15 de Deciembre. Aquellos que deseen votar, deben registrarse como miembro de la OSM Foundation hasta el 15 Noviembre: https://join.osmfoundation.org/ En el próximo Martes, 13 de Noviembre, a las 12:00 (BsAs/Santiago) / 13:00 (Brasília),

Re: [Talk-cz] Nefunkční taginfo

2018-11-06 Per discussione Tom Ka
út 6. 11. 2018 v 6:32 odesílatel Marián Kyral napsal: > Tak hlásím, že opraveno, ale bude nějakou pár hodin trvat, než se > zneplatní keše a změna se dostane opravdu všude. > > Tak taginfo teď vede na openstreetmap.cz, což si nejsem jist, zda je dobře. S tim bych uz si mel byt schopen poradit,

Re: [OSM-talk] How to get an overview of multiple gpx on OSM map?

2018-11-06 Per discussione Dave F
Hi There are lots of sites giving advice on GPS usage, but one I tip I found useful was always keep a charged battery in your unit. Even though it's switched off it still receives the occasional signal from satellites to keep track of their locations. if it loses coordination with them it can

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Tod Fitch
I detested the “Six Californias” when it was being proposed as a ballot measure. Perhaps that is flavoring my response, but at one time or another I’ve generated topo maps for areas that lie within four of those six divisions so it would be a bit of a hassle for me to have that. If a split

Re: [Talk-us] California is too big ;)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 06.11.2018 11:53, Vivek Bansal wrote: > 2.  I would certainly love smaller more regularly updated extracts!  I'm > not sure how much my team would pay for it though. The downloads are free of charge. Maybe I should check with the Interline folks, I don't want to step on their toes with

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Max
Grazie per i consigli Alfredo, non avevo mai preso in considerazione il Protlach, lo proverò e sulla base dei feedback di quest'anno sceglierò l'editor più adatto per il corso del prossimo anno. Anche sul Locus si ha la possibilità di importare layer WMS, e quindi di usare carte tecniche

[Talk-ca] Stats Canada building outline import plan

2018-11-06 Per discussione john whelan
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Canada_Stats_Canada_Building_Outlines_Import/Plan I've formally submitted it to the imports mailing list for comments and comments are invited here for the next two weeks. After that the plan is to start the import process. Thanks John

Re: [Talk-br] Cedência dos dados de cartografia da IPPUC de Curitiba / Importação de numeração predial

2018-11-06 Per discussione santamariense
Obrigado pessoal pelo feedback. Fiz na calculadora de campo mesmo a formatação dos nomes e números, quanto a isso tá suave. Trebien, talvez não tinha explicado direito, mas de qualquer maneira acho que o Sérgio já deixou claro. O reposicionamento do centroide para junto dos logradouros será feito

[OSM-talk] Garmin GPS and OSM-based maps (was: Re: How to get an overview of multiple gpx on OSM map?)

2018-11-06 Per discussione Andy Townsend
Whilst it's great that Garmin are offering the convenience pre-installed OSM-based maps, it's worth bearing in mind that there are lots of free download options - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mkgmap for creating your own and

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione sepp1974
Am 06.11.2018 12:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > ... > > wenn Du das so siehst sind wir uns einig, weil in Operator tragen wir die > Firmennamen ein. Thema erledigt, oder? > > Gruß, > Martin > ___ > Talk-de mailing list > Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet du mois de novembre: gendarmerie/police

2018-11-06 Per discussione Donat ROBAUX
Merci Phyks pour le fichier. Je ne l'avais pas vu sur data.gouv. Je ne vois pas comment l'intégrer dans le Projet du mois vu la gueule du fichier (au passage, c'est un scandale de proposer ca dans le cadre de l'opendata), mais je pense qu'on pourra s'en servir a posteriori pour qualifier les

Re: [Talk-it] [OT] Confini Croazia

2018-11-06 Per discussione Daniele Forsi
Il giorno mar 6 nov 2018 alle ore 12:28 Sergio Manzi ha scritto: > penso che sarebbe opportuno avere anche un profilo del territorio definito > dalla linea di base, cosa che mi sembra capire oggi non ci sia penso che dovresti fare qualche ricerca nei dati per capire se c'è io non ne so POCO

Re: [Talk-it] tracciamo il futuro di OpenStreetMap in Italia?

2018-11-06 Per discussione Matteo Zaffonato
Il 05/11/2018 21:18, Cascafico Giovanni ha scritto: Il lun 5 nov 2018, 20:59 Aury88 > ha scritto: la mia domanda è perchè non proviamo ad aumentare  le voci con coordinate geografiche e/o riferimenti, all'interno delle voci, con un qualche

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Stefan Kaufmann
Am 06.11.18 um 09:41 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > Darf man ein Rathaus mappen, wenn man dadurch implizit auch mappt wo der > Bürgermeister sein Büro hat, sind das nicht Daten die personenbeziehbar sind? > Oder gibt es evtl Grenzen bei der „Personenbeziehbarkeit“? Alle Daten die > sich nicht

Re: [Talk-it] [OT] Confini Croazia

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Di., 6. Nov. 2018 um 12:56 Uhr schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > http://www.edizionieuropee.it/LAW/HTML/37/zn67_04_148.html > direi che dovrebbero prevalere le descrizioni, per esempio quando c'è scritto: "Da punto più orientale Isola Caprara (42° 08', 25 - 15° 31',

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Alfredo Gattai
Ce ne sono si e se qualcuno e' abituato con quelle continui pure. Io in fase di pianificazione uso molto Orxumap perche' ci carico sotto tutte le CTR della mia regione e vedo dove sono vecchi tracciati che ora sono invisibile. Georesq pero' ha il vantaggio che per l'attivita' escursionistica e per

Re: [Talk-it] Inserimento dati CAI

2018-11-06 Per discussione Alfredo Gattai
Non e' che non sono daccordo, ci mancherebbe, ma il problema e' sempre il solito, cercare di avvicinare persone che potrebbero non essere "smanettoni" ad OSM. Se presentiamo JOSM ad un utilizzatore medio lo facciamo scappare ed invece vogliamo esattamente il contrario. I corsi vanno un po' fatti a

Re: [Talk-cz] Národní archiv leteckých snímků

2018-11-06 Per discussione Jan Macura
On Tuesday, 6 November 2018, Marián Kyral wrote: >> b) protože "© ČÚZK" > Kolik že to je? 80 let po smrti autora? A kdo je vlastně autor? :-D Autorské právo platí 70 let od smrti autora. Nevsadil bych ale na to, že stejná doba se aplikuje i na "zvláštní právo pořizovatele databáze", nehledě na

Re: [Talk-cz] Národní archiv leteckých snímků

2018-11-06 Per discussione jozka
citace: Snímky z let 1936 až 2002 byly pořízeny Ministerstvem obrany České republiky, respektive jeho předchůdci. Od roku 2003 jsou snímky pořizovány ve spolupráci Českého úřadu zeměměřického a katastrálního a Ministerstva obrany České republiky. konec citace. Muzeme zacit flejm kdy ze to

Re: [Talk-it] [OT] Confini Croazia

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Di., 6. Nov. 2018 um 12:04 Uhr schrieb Sergio Manzi : > In realtà esistono delle differenze: un esempio (*ma ce ne sono altri*) è > che la legge penale di uno stato non si estende alle sue acque territoriali > quando il fatto avvenga/sia avvenuto su una nave battente bandiera > differente da

Re: [Talk-de] POIs - Details - Gerichtsurteil

2018-11-06 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Di., 6. Nov. 2018 um 12:03 Uhr schrieb : > es war Dein Beispiel, über den Betreibernamen einer Kneipe dessen > frühere Aktivitäten recherchieren zu können, um daraus Rückschlüsse über > die Qualität der angebotenen Dienstleistung zu konstruieren. Ich habe > das lediglich ins positive durch

  1   2   >