From: Václav Řehák [mailto:rehak...@gmail.com]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Blocked applications at tile server
Is there anything that can be done to unblock fixed applications?
And if there is no will to change the situation, can you recommend me
another Android app for displaying OSM tiles and
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Moderating / Quality checking OSM contributions
I thought this was foolish at the time, and it still is.
highway=* should match the classification given by the government or
roading authority, and should
From: Martijn van Exel [mailto:m...@rtijn.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [osmosis-dev] Osmosis replication fails
Another thing - can you just change over from using minutely to hourly
replication files without re-initializing? I tried that and now it does
not seem to pick up any replication
From: Frans Thamura [mailto:fr...@meruvian.org]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Knowing the Access vs TIle Management
hi all
my server is only 1TB space, and we know full map can achive 91 TB, i
read from here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tile_Disk_Usage
so we know the space usage, and
[mailto:k...@maploser.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:18 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: openstreetmap; nicolas chavent
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] odbl non-agreement and humanitarian exceptions.
This is going to require some analysis, but I believe all of the
decliners were tracing from satellite
I have started daily coastline shapefile generation on my home server. The
data is pulled from my jxapi database and processed, starting at 1 AM PST (9
AM UTC) and takes 3-5 hours to generate and upload, depending on my internet
connection.
The files will be available at
I believe it is available on Ian's github at
https://github.com/iandees/osm-deep-history
I don't believe he's put a license on it, likely since no one has asked.
https://github.com/iandees/osm-deep-history
From: Andrew Harvey [mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com]
Subject: [OSM-talk] deep diff tool
I know the stylesheet maintainers are backed up, but is there a ticket
indicating what additions to the stylesheet are desired in trac? The only
mapnik ticket I can find relating to public transport is
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2798
Do any of the general purpose styles (e.g.
In my car I still use a printed map book, which I'd like to replace with one
using OSM data and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions.
The features I consider requirements are
- Tiled pages with an index map at the front of the book
- Arrows on each page indicating the number of the
the PDFs from the command line?
From: Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 1:08 AM
To: Steve Bennett
Cc: Paul Norman; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
Hi,
The two 'townguide' ones are mine, but the demonstration web
to
look in that direction
- An index page at the front
- The ability to skip maps
From: Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 2:50 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: Steve Bennett; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: RE: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
.
It's good to hear that it works for someone else.
From: Graham Jones [mailto:grahamjones...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:38 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: Steve Bennett; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: RE: [OSM-talk] Printed map books
Hi Paul,
This is very good. I had
I'd like to announce the release of version 0.01 of mapbook, a PDF map book
creator for mapnik generated maps. This is very much a development release
and is missing what I view to be important features.
mapbook can be found at https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook
Features:
It uses Mapnik's
Removing a limited set of objects was proposed by rweait in
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2012-March/004589.html.
What was actually removed went beyond what was discussed. I proposed rolling
them back in
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2012-March/004599.html but
I have completed an overhaul to my mapbook program, making it easier to
extend and adding new features.
This program, available at https://github.com/pnorman/mapbook, will create a
PDF with a title page, an index map showing the coverage of the book and
what page covers what area, then
From: Stefan de Konink [mailto:ste...@konink.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] GSOC2012 Video Based Speed Limit Detector
Hi,
On 21-03-12 21:04, Emanuela Boroș wrote:
My name is Emanuela Boros and I am a second year Software Engineering
master's student at the Al. Ioan Cuza University of
-Original Message-
From: AJ Ashton [mailto:aj.ash...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] automated abbreviation changes?!
Its much easier for tools to automatically abbreviate words than the
other way around. (We've done automatic abbreviations for the latest
MapBox map [1].) I
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the
latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I switched it over to filter out
data that WTFE reports as dirty. This is somewhat more aggressive than the
rebuild will be, but the results are worrisome.
A PNG showing the OSM
-Original Message-
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:42 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server
-Original Message-
From: David Groom [mailto:revi...@pacific-rim.net]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
- Original Message -
From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
I have been running
-Original Message-
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:21 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
Paul Norman writes:
It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted
From: ThomasB [mailto:toba0...@yahoo.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines
just fyithe generation of the processedc_p failed. It say it has 46
Byte.
coastlinec_p seems to be okay
My jxapi instance is lagged behind - it lost its state.txt file in a crash
and fell a couple
I have completed another coastline generation and it has uploaded. This
version respects odbl=clean.
The shapefiles are in their normal place at
http://pnorman.dev.openstreetmap.org/coastlines/
Included is a .osm file with all the error points.
An overview can be found at
Toby wrote:
Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually
from 12:30 AM CST last night when I started the jxapi query before
going to bed.
Also, it looks like http://www.wightpaths.co.uk/coast/CT-only.php
has
been updated with your new files since you sent
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:01 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:31:53 Clifford Snow wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Paul Norman
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Komuna e Malishevës, Serbia ?
Mike Dupont wrote:
2012/4/1 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk
Altin Ukshini wrote:
Does anyone care about these reports ?
I said it
of their locations
-Original Message-
From: ThomasB [mailto:toba0...@yahoo.de]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:01 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update
Hi Paul,
do you plan another update?
Regards
Thomas
Paul Norman wrote
I have completed another
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] server migration update / license change
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de wrote:
Thanks a lot for the Update, Richard. It is much appreciated that the
information flow works.
I have a
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] server migration update / license change
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
If the tiles are not regenerated then they will contain elements that
are licensed as cc by-sa only.
Old
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Terentiev [mailto:djterent...@yandex.ru]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2012 12:16 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Detecting unwanted edits and vandalism
Adam,
Very often newbie to OSM start their contribution with moving object
From: Ruogu Ding [mailto:ruogu.d...@kaust.edu.sa]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Download all OSM GPS traces
Hi,
I find a planet.gpx is being offered but with only GPS points. I
understand that this is helpful, and appreciate the efforts in
generating this file. However, many people (like me) need
will be
automatically added to map with respective tags after synchronizing with
gps tracks.
I would request if anyone has such images/videos along with gpx file to
share here as these will be helpful while developing the plugin.
--
Nikhil Upadhye
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Paul Norman
I'd suggest a digital camera with an intervalometer to capture images every
few seconds. Canon PowerShots with CHDK work for this.
The mounts look useful but you can get similar mounts separately (e.g.
http://delkin.com/c-147099-mounts-mini-mount.html)
From: Colin Smale
robust once the base is properly build.
Any other suggestions regarding the idea are welcome!
--
Nikhil
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The road signs, max speeds and bus stops don't take long to tag. Take
the bus stop in IMG_3429.JPG as an example
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change
Hi,
On 04/13/2012 08:14 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
I downloaded all natural=coastline ways from my jxapi. Then I split
the world into 4 parts to make them small enough
Through editor errors or other mistakes there are a number of relations in
OSM which have no members. I propose a mechanical edit to delete these where
they are not members of some other way. My proposed procedure, documented at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/pnorman_imports
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change
Hi,
On 04/13/12 11:00, Paul Norman wrote:
This technique works well for smaller areas, but when I tried running
the license check plugin on a 5 GB .osm file
.
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Subject: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical edit: Empty Relations
Through editor errors or other mistakes there are a number of relations
in OSM which have no members. I propose a mechanical edit to delete
these where they are not members of some
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] handheld gps unit
What about a camera with built-in GPS? That way you can make photo
documentation of the progress at each site with a timestamp and
geostamp[1]. Many cameras also record audio, so you
If I saw one of these locally I would verify that it corresponds to nothing
on the ground and then delete it.
-Original Message-
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:28 PM
To: Open Street Map mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing
The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page with the details of the
proposed upload, as well as contact info (i.e. main account).
Please provide documentation on all the points in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy#Document
From: Worst Fixer
/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
From: Worst Fixer [mailto:worstfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:31 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Edit review: building=levels=N
Hello.
2012/5/20 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
The mechanical edit policy calls for a wiki page
Select the nodes then use search within selection - or search for selected
source=something
From: john whelan [mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 9:27 AM
To: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
Subject: [OSM-talk] Selecting validation warnings in JOSM
Is there a way to
Could you post the code used to generate the changesets? That would be the
easiest way for some of us to review your proposed changes. It wouldn’t remove
the need to explain it to non-programmers, but it would be much easier for some
of us if we could look at the code.
That being said, a
.
2012/5/30 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
Could you post the code used to generate the changesets?
Ich may not. Some parts of it are not open source. I think of clean
rewrite.
The logic that you have created is what I'm interested in.
That would be the
easiest way for some
From: maning sambale [mailto:emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 6:38 PM
To: jaa...@helleranta.com
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] new bing hires updates not visible in JOSM?
I don't think this is the case because when I am using JOSM, the old
hires imagery is
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 1:47 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Licence redaction ready to begin
Test runs have shown that the bot is functioning as we want it to, but
we will of course be monitoring its progress. We are currently expecting
it
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are generated
with the coastcheck program[1] from my jxapi database starting at 5 AM
pacific time. They take 3-4 hours to generate and upload, depending on my
internet speed at the time.
The completed files are uploaded to
From: andrzej zaborowski [mailto:balr...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OT - Unusual Bing imagery
On 24 July 2012 03:48, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2012-07-23 16:02, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
The area in the screenshot seems to have a higher resolution than
though I know when my runs finish.
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:55 PM
To: 'osm-talk'
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed
I have resumed my daily generation of coastline files. These are
generated with the coastcheck program[1] from
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction finished already?
Jan Kučera wrote:
Ok so are imports allowed again?
Back in April I made this request:
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk@openstreetmap.org/msg42372.html
and I'd suggest that it
Now that the redaction bot has finished running, I want to propose what
should be a simple uncontroversial mechanical edit (hah).
I propose cleaning up two types of empty relations that are not members of
other relations.
- Those with no members and no tags
- Those with no members and
From: Werner Hoch [mailto:werner...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 6:33 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical import: Empty relations 1
Am Sonntag, den 29.07.2012, 02:06 -0700 schrieb Paul Norman:
Now that the redaction bot has
From: Mike N [mailto:nice...@att.net]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed mechanical import: Empty relations 1
On 7/29/2012 5:06 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
- Those with no members and no tags
- Those with no members and type=multipolygon as the only tag
Relations removed will be limited
Whoops - looks like I had disabled the cron job. Files should start
uploading at about 2-3 AM UTC.
-Original Message-
From: Simone Cortesi [mailto:sim...@cortesi.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:34 PM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation
I happened to notice the coastline for an entire island in South Sulawesi,
Indonesia is missing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-6.1219lon=120.4563zoom=14layers=M
There also seem to be a lot of primary roads and few lower classifications.
This actually may not be redaction related.
I'm
uploading
frequently is always a good idea.
Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 1:01 AM
To: osm-talk
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] DWG post-redaction bot cleanup
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:29 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
The Data Working Group is beginning to revert some copypaste
From: Stephan Knauss [mailto:o...@stephans-server.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] DWG post-redaction bot cleanup
Hello Norman,
On 26.08.2012 03:49, Paul Norman wrote:
The redactions are being done from
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pnorman%20redaction%20revert
can you give a rough
.
This does not mean that the license has changed. I am not in a position to
comment on any other tasks that need to be completed before a switch to
ODbL.
Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
Non-commercial only licenses discriminate against fields of endeavor and are
definitely not open. See 6 of http://opensource.org/docs/osd or 8 of
http://opendefinition.org/okd/. No derivative licenses are also not open -
you can't modify the data.
Another explanation is
I saw this mentioned on IRC but I haven't seen it here, so I figured I'd
point out cquest's live edit viewer at:
http://osm7.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/live/
It zooms in and shows you various edits and where people are editing
worldwide. It unfortunately doesn't show you geometry.
OSMZmiany is
to revert some subsequent changesets first.
Paul Norman
For the DWG
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
If you want to add additional wording you could do so. Your wording must
make people aware that the data comes from OpenStreetMap and that it is
available under the ODbL.
Of course, you can only use the ODbL attribution after the new planet is
published and you reload your database.
If you
Yikes. I have some tools that will work on the very large changesets, I'll
get around to it tomorrow (heading to bed now).
Also, if there's legal problems it needs to be redacted, not just deleted.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Errington [mailto:erringt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday,
From: Malcolm Herring [mailto:malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Change to ODbL imminent
On 11/09/2012 17:16, Richard Weait wrote:
About thirty hours later, that newly-generated planet file will be
available
What news?
To quote TomH, a watched planet never dumps.
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 7:11 AM
To: Frederik Ramm
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines OSMF/DWG governance
2012/9/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Just to clarify this one point: The
Sending to imports@ and cc'ing talk@ as that's more widely read than the
wiki talk pages.
From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
Or, to make it even clearer, can I commit my change to the wiki without
starting an edit
From: Vincent de Chateau-Thierry [mailto:v...@laposte.net]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
Hi,
Le 19/09/2012 22:55, Richard Weait a écrit :
- Cadastre is not an import. Cadastre is an import. Could you do
the same thing if there were no Cadastre to import?
From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 7:41 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
On vendredi 21 septembre 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Hi again,
This is not about one rule. This is
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
who last edited an object! ). Where the import HAS nice unique object
identifiers things are a lot easier, but raw vector data like the French
import, and I think the Spanish data you
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 11:47 PM
To: 'OSM'
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
Paul Norman wrote:
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
My main machine is down at the moment so this isn't as detailed as I'd like, but I have a few thoughts.On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:11 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:A propos of the recent contretemps about Cadastre imports and separate accounts (excessive use of French in this
On Sep 25, 2012, at 01:00 PM, THEVENON Julien julien_theve...@yahoo.fr wrote: The need to keep these conditions open-ended is a weakness that lets detractors claim that they are arbitrary, but I'm guessing that this is necessary to prevent users gaming the rules with stupid technical loopholes...
From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:02 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Proposal for import guidelines
Tordanik wrote:
If you want to address changes performed by scripts/bots, then why
don't you just say so
From: Olivier Croquette [mailto:m...@ocroquette.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
This is not an example that you only find after a long search; it is a
typical cadastre import building.
From: Tony Morris [mailto:tonymor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 10:29 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Pre-delete-bot
Hello,
I am trying to get the OSM data prior to the running of the deletion
bot. I am able to access CC-BY-SA licenced data from
From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Conclusion:
A significant number of cadastre imported buildings consist of
multiple ways
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
2012/9/27 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
Just so there is no misunderstanding: even taking address tagged nodes
in to account, the addresses / houses ratio
sept. 2012 02:13 HAEC, Paul Norman a écrit :
Obviously buildings are part of it, but is there a list of what else?
Hi,
I don't think there is a list.
the information that you can find are highway references,street
names,city boundaries,cemetery boundaries,buildings,house
number
Le ven. 28 sept. 2012 08:00 HAEC, Paul Norman a écrit :
sorry this detailled here in section les differents calques
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cadastre_Français/Aspects_techni
ques_du_cadastre_en_ligne
and here qu est ce qui est reutilisable
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
From: THEVENON Julien [mailto:julien_theve...@yahoo.fr]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:26 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Réf.: Re: All you've ever wanted to know about the
french cadastre
to be allowed to use cadastre data we have to add a source key which is
long about 40 characters to
From: Toby Murray [mailto:toby.mur...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Réf.: Re: All you've ever wanted to know about the
french cadastre
I think the biggest cost for long tags that are heavily used is really
in the planet file size. A bigger planet takes longer to generate, longer
to
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
Am 30.09.2012 um 02:04 schrieb Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
in a city where the buildings are joined
From: Vladimir Vyskocil [mailto:vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french
cadastre
The larger part of cadastre data
is just dumped into the data base never to be touched again by any
mapper.
That's also wrong, the french
From: Christian Quest [mailto:cqu...@openstreetmap.fr]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 12:58 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Semi-automated edits - postal code database
2012/10/4 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
And, btw, you should not use the associatedStreet
From: Jean-Marc Liotier [mailto:j...@liotier.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] Continued aggression against
French contributors (cadastre integration)
Of course, international collaboration requires a common ground and the
Internet has
From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:41 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Standard way across edits to tag changesets
Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 22:26:56, Marc a écrit :
Hi
Thanks for your proposal. I commented
Record a list of objects and monitor the minutely diffs for anything
touching them. Additionally, if interested in areas, watch for any nodes
created or moved into those areas.
Bonus points if you get it watching for deletes.
I have given thought to coding something like this - there are a
From: Frederik Ramm [mailto:frede...@remote.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 4:53 AM
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: [OSM-talk] Planning to retire OSMI's redaction view
Hi,
I'm planning to retire OSMI's redaction view at the end of the
month (unless I hear widespread protest).
The DWG periodically receives request to redact content from the database.
As the person generally responsible for running those redactions, I thought
I'd share some detail on what information I need to redact something. This
is not going to cover the legal reasons to redact something. Those are
From: d...@osmfoundation.org [mailto:d...@osmfoundation.org] On Behalf
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:43 AM
To: Paul Norman
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; d...@osmfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction requests - the information I need
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Paul
From: Pieren [mailto:pier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 2:45 AM
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap; d...@osmfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Redaction requests - the information I need
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Planet dumps only
From: Ed Loach [mailto:e...@loach.me.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] public_transport=platform not rendered
I'd rather deprecate platform for busses if anything.
One of the problems with the bus stop tag, and hoping I don't reopen old
arguments, is that due to a mistranslation in the wiki in
Aside from the automatically dropped tags there are:
tiger:cfcc
tiger:county
tiger:name_base
tiger:name_direction_suffix
tiger:name_direction_prefix
tiger:name_type
tiger:reviewed
tiger:zip_left
tiger:zip_right
My practice is to drop county if the county relation exists and is
From: bruno [mailto:br...@anche.no]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Role of the Wiki
On mer, 2012-12-05 at 05:49 +0100, Roland Olbricht wrote:
- use tags or tag keys that have been used quite often
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/
What if a new way of tagging something gets approved? The
From: Werner Hoch [mailto:werner...@gmx.de]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] House Numbers
That one looks strange to:
3490 OSMF Redaction Account
I don't think that the redaction bot actively mapped adresses.
I'd expect the redaction bot has mapped zero adresses.
In certain scenarios the
On 2013-01-06, at 7:50 PM, Nathan Mixter nmix...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if OSM could do the same thing. Could we buy as a group a
program like Feature Analyst, eCognition or Imagine Objective and add
buildings that way? We could combine the buildings with any existing address
From: Alex Barth [mailto:a...@mapbox.com]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] RFC - OSM contributor mark
My initial writeup could have been clearer: This RFC _does_ seek to
replace the currently recommended line (c) OpenStreetMap contributors
linking to http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright with a
From: Ilya Zverev [mailto:zve...@textual.ru]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Recent edits in the wiki / Trademark issue
Hi. Since no one has explained, I'd quote a part from OSMF Board Meeting
Minutes:
OSMF received C+D letter from someone who trademarked the word
“Geocode(TM)” and asks us to
1 - 100 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
