Hi Bill McCarthy,
Friday, June 24, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Hello TB Beta List,
When I invoke a system shortcut to invoke Get New
Mail or Check New Mail for All, the CC still comes
up in the background.
No confirmation about this, I use the rightclick in TB's systray icon
Hi Bill McCarthy,
Friday, June 24, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Hello TB Beta List,
When I invoke a system shortcut to invoke Get New
Mail or Check New Mail for All, the CC still comes
up in the background.
I just tried it with Alt+F2 and got the CC in foreground also, so no
On 2005-06-24 (14:35), you wrote:
First things first.
Tell this to RITLABS ...
If IMAP and Exchange handling reach the quality level of POP, then by
all means start playing around with nntp.
In pronciples you are all right, but in facts. For example: customisable
interface is not
On 6/25/05, Charlene Ferrara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I invoke a system shortcut to invoke Get New
Mail or Check New Mail for All, the CC still comes
up in the background.
I just tried it with Alt+F2 and got the CC in foreground also, so no
confirmation. Sorry :)
Charlene, to see
Hello 9Val,
Friday, June 24, 2005, 6:51:28 PM, you wrote:
[-] IMAP : possibility to purge
I can't find it. Where it is hidden? ;)
--
Best regards,
Viliusmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.5.31
Hallo danger,
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:55:19 -0400GMT (24-6-2005, 22:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
D With a large message base I can not Stop the search on the message
D finder.
RO I can here. Searched my tbot folder (12000 msgs) pressed on stop when
D try with 157,565 e-mails
I
Het was op zaterdag 25 juni 2005 om 9:56 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'The
Bat! 3.5.0.31 is now available' :
Hallo Vilius,
[-] IMAP : possibility to purge
VŠ I can't find it. Where it is hidden? ;)
eh, Purged! I'm afraid. :grin:
--
regards,
Cees
Destroy the Borg? Upload Windows 95
Het was op zaterdag 25 juni 2005 om 9:00 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'The
Bat! 3.5.0.31 CC Still in Background' :
Hallo Charlene,
When I invoke a system shortcut to invoke Get New
Mail or Check New Mail for All, the CC still comes
up in the background.
CF I just tried it with Alt+F2 and
Hi Avi Yashar,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Charlene, to see this bug, you must go to OptionsPreferencesSystem
Hot Keys and set up a hotkey for Check Mail for ALL Accounts and
Check Mail for Current Account.
At first I did not use my own shortcut but the old
Hi Cees,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
F confirmation. Sorry :)
yes and no
when I try it with alt+F2 is comes up in the foreground.
But I also have ctrl+alt+F12 to check all mail; and THEN it remains in the
background.
As i wrote to Avi, the single
--On Friday, June 24, 2005 7:48 pm -0500 Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... and you're right on that. Mulberry's main problem is it's lack of
multi-threading.
Could that be the key to it's efficiency?
Nope. But your method of solving the problem only creates new ones and
I'm sure
--On Saturday, June 25, 2005 10:56 am +0300
=?windows-1257?Q?Vilius_=D0umskas?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't find it. Where it is hidden? ;)
CTRL+C
--
Tony
iMac
Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Avi,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 2:37:28, you wrote:
I don't know if this needs a new bug report.
That would be helpful!
Either way, I cannot log
in to bt account - and I cannot reactivate it, because the site is too
automated. It sends information about a URL to fix the problem to an
old
Hello Tbbeta,
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI and the
download page?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta is 3.5.31 | 'Using TBBETA'
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 4:17:34 AM [GMT -0500], Tony Boom wrote:
Could that be the key to it's efficiency?
No. ThunderBird worked and it had no such lack of multi-threading.
I'm not a programmer, I don't know how these things are done, I can only
tell it the way I see it. All I know is
Hi Allie,
AM Interesting what you do there. Isn't the laptop connectable to the
AM Internet? Why don't you connect to the server and do the
AM synchronisation?
Of course it is. But until a week ago I was using ISDN dial-up and had
no intention of transfering the same data twice. Now though I'm
Hi Paul Van Noord,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
CF Hm... if a customised Alt+F2 does open CC in background and an
CF untouched native Alt+F2 opens CC in foreground, Rit really should
CF take a second look at the code.
If the provided [Alt]+[F2] has worked for
Hi Avi Yashar,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Thanks to Bill McCarthy for first pointing this out. Bill and Charlene
and anyone else who has comments on the weirdness of this, please
enter your notes on the above report.
Done. :)
--
kind regards
Charlene
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 2:02:14 AM [GMT -0500], Krzysztof Kudlacik
wrote:
In pronciples you are all right, but in facts. For example:
customisable interface is not connected with POP/IMAP/Exchange, but it
took over 6 months of RITs time.
Interestingly, it's this customisable interface
On 6/25/05, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if this needs a new bug report.
That would be helpful!
Done.
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4830
Thanks to Bill McCarthy for first pointing this out. Bill and Charlene
and anyone else who has comments on the
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 5:31:36 AM [GMT -0500], Paul Van Noord
wrote:
If the provided [Alt]+[F2] has worked for years, why does one see the
need to change it?
To something other than Alt-F2?
Furthermore, setting a custom hotkey to the same as a provided hotkey
is illogical. Other
On 6/25/05, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI and the
download page?
IMHO, at this point in time, there is no choice. You have already
released 3.5.25, 3.5.26, and 3.5.30. Releasing 3.5.0.31 suggests that
this is an
Hi all,
I mentioned this problem in an exchange with Tony. However, just to make
sure it's seen by the developers, I'll dedicate a message to it.
I'm a FastMail user and TB! has been working quite well except for this
commonly occurring. In fact, whenever, I login to my account and read
new
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 12:43 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
I don't keep a complete archive either, but the starting message was
posted by me on the 3rd of June at 2144 bearing the subject of
Deficiencies in v3.5.
Hmmm, so its nothing new. One personal
Hi,
ASK Please point me to the starting message on gmane or mailarchive,
ASK I haven't seen the topic in the past 1 1/2 weeks and I've been
ASK away was unsubscribed before.
I don't keep a complete archive either, but the starting message was
posted by me on the 3rd of June at 2144 bearing the
On 6/25/05, Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 2:37:28, you wrote:
I don't know if this needs a new bug report.
That would be helpful!
Will do.
Either way, I cannot log
in to bt account - and I cannot reactivate it, because the site is too
automated. It
MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI
MM and the download page?
N.
Before you dont fix this bug, DO NOT RELEASE IT. I sent into the
TBBETA list yesterday ( it is a MAJOR bug):
3.5.31 cannot send/receive mails to/from MS Exchange server.
Part of
6/25/2005 6:26 AM
Hi Charlene,
On 6/25/2005 Charlene Ferrara wrote:
CF Hi Avi Yashar,
CF Saturday, June 25, 2005
CF you let us know -at least in parts- :
Charlene, to see this bug, you must go to OptionsPreferencesSystem
Hot Keys and set up a hotkey for Check Mail for ALL Accounts and
Hi Maxim Masiutin,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Hello Tbbeta,
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI and the
download page?
Not bad at all so far. No serious bug in POP to be found, starts and
ends fine. Would be a good idea to
On 6/25/05, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Hello Tbbeta,
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI and the
download page?
Sorry, Maxim, I misunderstood the question. It seems like you and 9Val
have different numbering systems. So, yes, 3.5.31 does seem to be
generally better
Hi list
Recent beta version didn't solve old bugs:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4635
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4676
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
--
Best regards,
Martin
TheBat! 3.5.0.31 Pro on Windows 98 4 10 A
pgpdcYKaHPsvW.pgp
Description: PGP
6/25/2005 6:56 AM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AM IMO, you shouldn't be using IMAP.
AS I have to, for these reasons:
AS - I want seperate folders with the ability of server-side filtering by
AS my provider.
AS - I want to be able to use both a mail client and my provider's
Hi Martin Schoch,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Recent beta version didn't solve old bugs:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4635
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4676
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
Confirmed for 0004676: Right-click
Hello Maxim!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 5:29 AM, you wrote:
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? ,,,
Yes, for me, it is--using POP3, with OTFE not installed, and not
using any anti-spam plug-in.
Should we update the MSI and the download page?
Yes, if you are receiving reports that
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 6:29:34 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI
MM and the download page?
For me, I'd definitely have to say yes. I haven't had the
cascading AVs that I had with 3.5.30.
--
Mike
Using The Bat!
Hi Roelof,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:14:57 AM. I believe you wrote:
RO I can't, I've got no more than 105833 messages in my account.
RO However, I selected all folders, used a two key search, after TB had
RO found 6 hits I
Hi Alex,
ASK Hmmm, so its nothing new.
Yes, TheBat behaves like this since the earliest version I have seen -
1.53, I believe.
ASK One personal preference against the
ASK other, and the proclamation of partly self-raised standards
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 2:13:20 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Avi,
AY Charlene, to see this bug, you must go to OptionsPreferencesSystem
AY Hot Keys and set up a hotkey for Check Mail for ALL Accounts and
AY Check Mail for Current Account. Then when you use that hotkey you
AY will see
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 16:00 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
ASK One personal preference against the other, and the proclamation of
ASK partly self-raised standards
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of editors
were doing it all wrong and
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 4:34:03 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Charlene,
CF At first I did not use my own shortcut but the old known Alt+F2
CF keystroke. This one works and opens CC in foreground as it should. When
CF I create my own customised shortcuts (I was lazy and took Alt+F2 as
On 6/25/05, Michael Acklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I doing this right? Is this the same thing you are getting, Avi?
Yes, Michael, you are doing it right. And, yes, it is the same thing
that I am getting. That is why I identified this problem largely in
relation to the system hotkeys.
One
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 5:59:29 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Avi,
AY https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4830
AY Thanks to Bill McCarthy for first pointing this out. Bill and Charlene
AY and anyone else who has comments on the weirdness of this, please
AY enter your notes on
6/25/2005 10:36 AM
Hi Michael,
On 6/25/2005 Michael Acklin wrote:
MA Saturday, June 25, 2005, 4:34:03 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
MA Hello Charlene,
CF At first I did not use my own shortcut but the old known Alt+F2
CF keystroke. This one works and opens CC in foreground as it should.
6/25/2005 10:28 AM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of editors
AS were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
bold enough to go outside
Hi Alex,
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
ASK No, thats not what I meant.
I understood you perfectly well. However, in this case precocious
remarks are not going to change anything: Thousands of
Hello once more,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 16:16 I (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
What you're saying would mean that the majority of TB users backs up your
wish. Is that the case? :-)
Uh... the Windows editor *removes* the LFs (that autoformat inserted)
before sending? Is that WOD? In the editor prefs
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 16:50 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that the thousands are wrong and everyone
speaking up against the weird system the lone one is using are intolerant
boneheads?
No, but TB isn't wrong either, and there is
Hi Paul,
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
AS editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
PVN Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing
PVN to be bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say
PVN the other
Hello Alto!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:50 AM, you wrote:
ASK What you're saying would mean that the majority of TB users
ASK backs up your wish. Is that the case? :-)
Apparently it is. On this list are very few people who have reported
that they explicitly like RIT's way, many who don't
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:05 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
Killer argument. Thousands of lemmings can't be wrong! :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Success is
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 10:03 AM, you wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that the thousands are wrong and
everyone speaking up against the weird system the lone one is using
are intolerant boneheads?
No, but TB isn't wrong either, and there is NO such thing as an
Hi Max,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI
MM and the download page?
I would say this is a rather odd question. It's good to be involved
with the product but Ritlabs should know whether the
Hello Charlene,
A reminder of what Charlene Ferrara typed on:
June 25, 2005 at 08:52:15 GMT +0200
Hello TB Beta List,
When I invoke a system shortcut to invoke Get New
Mail or Check New Mail for All, the CC still comes
up in the background.
CF No confirmation about this, I use the
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
GF Hi Max,
GF In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI
MM and the download page?
GF I would say this is a rather odd question. It's good to be involved
GF with the
Hi Stuart Cuddy,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
I believe he means when you have a system hotkey set to download all
messages. You find them in Options/Preferences/System Hotkeys. And I
can confirm that it opens in the background.
Yes, meanwhile we all know a
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 9:54:33 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Uh... the Windows editor *removes* the LFs (that autoformat inserted)
before sending? Is that WOD? In the editor prefs wrapping at column 75 is
set, and it appears on-screen, but is gone when I send... ?!? puzzled
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:12 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
I prefer MicroEd for writing e-mails, and I would very much like to
see it remain as my easy choice for using it.
Thanks for the support, Mary.
I'm not against adding _optional_ functionality to MicroEd for those
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36:04 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Paul,
PVN Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
PVN bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say the other
PVN editors are correct and the TB is wrong. The reverse is also true.
Hello Allie Martin everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:25 you (Allie Martin) wrote:
Uh... the Windows editor *removes* the LFs (that autoformat inserted)
before sending? Is that WOD? In the editor prefs wrapping at column 75 is
set, and it appears on-screen, but is gone when I send... ?!?
Hello Maxim,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:29:34 PM, among other things, you wrote:
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI and the
download page?
Yes, but there are of course still things to sort out!
Don't forget to put in BayesIt again.
--
Hello Paul!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36 AM, you wrote:
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
AS editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
bold enough to go outside the
Hi,
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
ASK Killer argument. Thousands of lemmings can't be wrong! :-)
How many computers are running Windows, how many OS/2?
We can like it or not like it at our own personal disretion, but there
are facts.
--
MfG,
Alto
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 10:27 AM, you wrote:
I prefer MicroEd for writing e-mails, and I would very much like to
see it remain as my easy choice for using it.
Thanks for the support, Mary.
My pleasure. Nice to be on the same page with you, here.
I'm not against adding
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 10:05:31 AM [GMT -0500], Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
Windows is the standard. It's the standard against with other OS's
should be judged. Afterall, it's what the majority uses so it's
architecture and approach
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 10:33:00 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Really?
I thought if I set TB to wrap at column 75, it would do that on sending,
and not only on-screen, and remove the formatting when sending. It means I
compose a message on-screen and it will not look the way
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
See attachment
--
/\/ Using The Bat! 3.5.0.31 Professional
/ \ / \ / Windows XP (5.1.2600 Service Pack 1)
/\/ e t \/ i c i o u s Plugins: BayesIt! 0.8.1 and miniRelayPlug 0.05.50
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 11:13:22 AM [GMT -0500], Netvicious wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Not blank here.
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat!™ v3.5.0.31
System Specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
I used to have a handle on life, then it broke.
Hi all,
I see that if you select the Folder pop-up menu or the Message viewer
popup menu in the Customiser, there are are items at the top which are
related to message navigation and which don't actually appear in the
popup menu. In this way, I can define shortcuts for items that aren't
really
Hello NetVicious!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 11:13 AM, you wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Confirmed. One blank item here, too.
That's in the Specials menu on TB!'s main window, not the Specials
menu in the View Folder window.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.5.0.31 on
On 6/25/05, NetVicious [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Perhaps it is the theme you have chosen. Or maybe something to do with
SP1 instead of SP2. I don't get the blank item. I see Watch Replies
In.
--
Avi Yashar
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro (No
Windows is the standard. It's the standard against with other OS's
should be judged. Afterall, it's what the majority uses so it's
architecture and approach must be right and any lone deviation should be
considered wrong and not in the interest of the user.
Alto was talking about the GUI of
On Sat 25-Jun-05 1:52am -0500, Charlene Ferrara wrote:
Hi Bill McCarthy,
Friday, June 24, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
Hello TB Beta List,
When I invoke a system shortcut to invoke Get New
Mail or Check New Mail for All, the CC still comes
up in the background.
No
Hello Allie,
A reminder of what Allie Martin typed on:
June 25, 2005 at 11:22:16 GMT -0500
AM Is there a way to add a new item to a toolbar or menu and yet make it
AM not appear in the menu. The idea behind this is that I wish to define
AM shortcuts for actions that are triggered when the
On Sat 25-Jun-05 11:13am -0500, NetVicious wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
See attachment
Yes, I noticed that also. I thought it was an
admission that Watch Replies In was still not working
properly ;-)
--
Best regards,
Bill
The Wounded Bat 3.5.0.31 Pro BayesIt!
Hello Goncalo,
On Saturday, 25 June 2005 at 17:15 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote:
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI
and the download page?
I would say this is a rather odd question. It's good to be involved
with the product but Ritlabs should know
On Sat 25-Jun-05 10:26am -0500, Roger Phillips wrote:
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:29:34 PM, among other things, you wrote:
MM Hello Tbbeta,
MM Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30?
MM Should we update the MSI and the download page?
Yes, but there are of course still things to sort out!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 11:25:39 AM [GMT -0500], Lars Sölter
wrote:
Alto was talking about the GUI of what ever operating system.
That's what *you're* talking about and not what Alto's talking about.
He's saying that once the majority uses a particular approach, then that
must say
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 11:34:16 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
Try creating a new menu bar, add the items to that menu, setup your
shortcuts and then hide the menu bar.
Would the menu bar shortcuts be active no matter which pane I have in
focus?
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat!™
Im not sure I speak for everyone, but I know Im not alone.
There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should
feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked.
The bugs database doesnt seem to be used to perform the functions it
should, since version
Hello Manuel!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 11:31 AM, you wrote:
Is 3.5.31 generally better than 3.5.30? Should we update the MSI
and the download page?
I would say this is a rather odd question. It's good to be involved
with the product but Ritlabs should know whether the product has
Hello Liz,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 19:45:27, you wrote:
There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should
feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked.
Which of the presistent bugs are trivial to fix, could you please specify?
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Hi Bill McCarthy and all others,
Saturday, June 25, 2005
you let us know -at least in parts- :
I see that Avi has set up a new BT report and that you
and Michael Acklin have added valuable comments to it.
That's great!
Please take this as an encouragement and be as TB-Co-user-friendly. Do
Hi Maxim,
In the message mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] which was
apparently written on Saturday, June 25, 2005, 6:07:15 PM. I believe you wrote:
There are a big number of persistant bugs that any developer should
feel are trivial to fix, but, that seem to be constantly overlooked.
MM Which of the
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 11:22:15 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Mary,
MB Confirmed. One blank item here, too.
MB That's in the Specials menu on TB!'s main window, not the Specials
MB menu in the View Folder window.
Not blank on either Folder View or Main Window. I am using the Office
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Confirmed. One blank item here, too.
That's in the Specials menu on TB!'s main window, not the Specials
menu in the View Folder window.
That blank item also appears in 3.5.30.
Vili
Hello Mary,
On Saturday, 25 June 2005 at 18:56 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
I think Maxim means to be speaking in connection with the specific
changes listed when 9Val made the announcement of the current (.31)
beta, when he [Maxim] writes the words generally better.
Okay, makes it a bit clearer,
Hello Allie,
A reminder of what Allie Martin typed on:
June 25, 2005 at 11:36:51 GMT -0500
AM wrote:
Try creating a new menu bar, add the items to that menu, setup your
shortcuts and then hide the menu bar.
AM Would the menu bar shortcuts be active no matter which pane I have in
AM
Hello Michael!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:17 PM, you wrote:
MB Confirmed. One blank item here, too.
MB That's in the Specials menu on TB!'s main window, not the Specials
MB menu in the View Folder window.
Not blank on either Folder View or Main Window. I am using the Office
2003 Theme.
Hello NetVicious everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 18:13 you (NetVicious) wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Not here, tried both the main window folder view. It does not disappear
when I change the theme, either.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ
Hello Manuel!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:26 PM, you wrote:
I think Maxim means to be speaking in connection with the specific
changes listed when 9Val made the announcement of the current (.31)
beta, when he [Maxim] writes the words generally better.
Okay, makes it a bit clearer, but
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:45 PM, you wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Not here, tried both the main window folder view. It does not disappear
when I change the theme, either.
Hmm. What if you change the theme to Default and then Restart TB!? (If
you
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 12:30:29 PM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy
wrote:
I'm sorry, I can't answer this. It may require some testing.
Unfortunately, this is an area that was introduced with some omissions
and inconsistencies.
I tested it. Once you give a toolbar button a shortcut, the
Hello Allie Martin everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:52 you (Allie Martin) wrote:
But TB removes linefeeds from messages created with the Windows editor.
Look at the source of the message I sent with Windows editor. It does not
contain LFs but only very long lines. Thats not what I had on
Hello NetVicious,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 5:13:22 PM, you wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Confirmed. Using Office 2003 theme.
Before the latest set of beta's I did move the 'Mark as Junk' up to the top
of this menu.
--
Best regards,
David
Hello NetVicious,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 5:13:22 PM, you wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Confirmed. Using Office 2003 theme.
Before the latest set of beta's I did move the 'Mark as Junk' up to the top
of this menu.
--
Best regards,
David
Hello Mary!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 12:58 PM, you wrote:
No, no. 3.26 and 3.30 were fixes to 3.5, and 3.5.25 was a fix to 3.5,
Aaargh! Typos of my own, again! Should have written 3.5.26 and
3.5.30.
Sorry. :woe:
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.5.0.31 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
6/25/2005 1:27 PM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Hi Alex,
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
ASK No, thats not what I meant.
AS I understood you perfectly well. However, in this case
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 20:00 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
I have one blank item in the Specials menu.
Not here, tried both the main window folder view. It does not disappear
when I change the theme, either.
Hmm. What if you change the theme to Default and then Restart
Mary Bull [MB] wrote,
Okay. So seems to be theme-related. I am using the Default theme.
I have been using Office 2003 theme for quite some time and do not
see this bug using it. I changed themes to Windows (default) and still
don't see it.
--
Regards,
Ron Secord
Using TB! 3.5.0.31
I don't know if this has been brought up before, but I just
noticed, the macro menu is basically nonfunctional when creating
templates - at least from the address book. Maybe there's a bug
already filed for it, but I thought it was worth mentioning.
--
Mike
Using The Bat!
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
