On Saturday, January 08, 2000, 11:52:11 PM, Quin Selman wrote:
> Not quite right. As I reported before, both Opera 3.61 and IE 5 have
> no trouble with the site. On my system, Opera is faster than IE 5.
> Netscape Navigator 4.6 just shows a blank page.
Hmmm... the first time I tried it with IE 5
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
There have been several discussions here comparing TB to various
other email clients, including Pegasus, PMMail, Calypso, Eudora,
Poco, and others.
As far as I know, none of these, despite any good features they may
have, allows viewing by thread--am I correct
Hello, The Bat Users!
FW> I'm another new user of TheBat, and I have a question about the positioning
FW> of TheBat's windows. Specifically, the editing window.
FW> I do -not- run Bat in maximized window mode, preferring to have "medium"
FW> size windows open, so I can have access to other thin
Hello, The Bat Users!
T> I created a manual filter that will move read messages to my specified
T> folder. So when I get new mail, I read them all and then issue the
T> "Re-filter" command in the folder menu. When the re-filter window
T> pops up, "Incoming Mail" is selected by default but "manu
Hello, The Bat Users!
TF>>> - "Kill file". Right clicking on a message automatically sets
TF>>> up a filter moving messages by that author into a specified
TF>>> box.
>> You've already got that - hit Ctrl-Shift-F in the message list window
>> when you've marked the appropriate message and
Hi Allie,
On 09 January 2000 at 00:06:35 GMT -0500 (which was 05:06 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
>> Marck, I'm getting those E-Mails as well, but the Reply-To address,
>> when posting to this List, IS my own address... still getting the
>> Mailer Daemon letters
Hello TBUDL,
This may simply be a RTFineM, but when I click on a URL in a mail, De
Bat! always opens it in my most recent IE (5) browser window. I'd
really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
force this? is there a key-combo? or is it beyond the bat!s control (a
M$ 'enhance
Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:09:15 PM, Derek wrote:
> Faster than Pocomail, and all the MS products...So you can have
> features without dragging the program down to MS or Netscape type
> bloat.
Not as fast as some that I've seen. Too bad it also doesn't have a decent
interface. That alone r
Friday, January 07, 2000, 6:10:38 PM, Januk wrote:
> It would appear to me that people are not seeing the obvious. There
> is a way to fill both needs, and that's through the appropriate use of
> plug ins.
Plug-ins are not the end-all, be-all answer, trust me.
> When implemented correctly,
Friday, January 07, 2000, 7:19:35 PM, John wrote:
> I hope they read Microsoft's documents on good Object Model design,
> and the value of automation. And, unlike Microsoft, follow that
> advice.
I hope they neither read nor follow anything from Microsoft. MS has not
built anything decent, e
Friday, January 07, 2000, 7:21:36 PM, Allie wrote:
> IOW, if user X, in the spirit of being human, fails to fill in the subject
> and messes up a thread, many innocents will suffer for it.
Noone suffered from it. People who replied could have just as easily
changed topics as well.
> This is
Friday, January 07, 2000, 7:58:37 PM, Douglas wrote:
> By incorporating an optional accounts column, all you're doing is changing
> the visualization of the message. The message IS linked to an account.
Uhm, no, it isn't. When I move a message from the inbox in
morpheus@rpglink to slamb3@cor
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 1:20:45 AM, Quin wrote:
> True. But that's the purpose of the pop-up: to verify if that's your
> intention.
Right. If it is blank, that is my intention. I don't want the computer
to question me. It is dumb, I am not. I don't need it verifying and approval
stamp
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 1:33:54 AM, Douglas wrote:
> But
> "show kludges" is not the same as:
> "show headers."
But the kludges it is showing *are* the headers as defined by RFC822. In
short, TB! had taken a common term and mangled it. This is bad, especially
for people in the suppor
Hallo Keith,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 00:50:01 -0700 GMT (09.01.2000, 15:50 +0800 GMT),
Keith Russell wrote:
>> Seems that what I and you experience is somewhat the same, only for *me*
>> the Encoding item in the main menu is always set to ISO-8859-1 (why??? I
>> don't use this encoding...), and for
Hallo Douglas,
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 15:01:52 -0600 GMT (09.01.2000, 05:01 +0800 GMT),
Douglas Hinds wrote:
>>> When you subscribe to things nowadays, sometimes you're given a
>>> choice of HTML of plain text but most of the time not at all, you
>>> get HTML. Email and HTML have to mix nowadays.
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 4:58:38 AM, Allie wrote:
> This means that you'll see the delete confirmation whenever you wish to do a
> delete operation deemed 'dubious'. Still in contrast to a popup message that
> appears *only* when you fail to do the right thing. :)
However, in this case, yo
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 7:51:40 AM, Tim wrote:
> That's true, but they would have the same function as the other
> buttons - you wouldn't have to take your hand off the mouse.
Assumption is that the hands were on the mouse in the first place. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 10:40:12 AM, Jason wrote:
> However, isn't its purpose the same as tbbeta and tbudl? If your forum
> rose in popularity, it would mean that we have to look in two places to
> keep current with TB discussions: Our email and a web forum. And that
> means we can't exclusiv
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 11:12:57 AM, Moosebreath wrote:
> I used to be able to edit a message and save it where it sits,
> doesn't look like a way to do that.
To what purpose?
> I'd like to be able to set up multiple accounts (I have 4), and
> use 1 set of mailbox folders with the option
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 11:24:44 AM, Andrew wrote:
> How can I setup such a filtering system? AFAIS, I can specify only a
> particular folder to put messages in. No regexps are allowed in
> folder's name... Or is it not possible in the current version of TB?
I don't believe it is allowed
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 12:25:01 PM, Alexander wrote:
> You got it right. Just Steve is dreaming aloud, as it's characteristic for him;-)
Hey now, I thought it was characteristic of me to bash everything and
never say anything positive. At least that is what someone said about me
recentl
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 2:26:34 AM, Owen wrote:
> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
> force this? is there a key-combo? or is it beyond the bat!s control (a
> M$ 'enhancement'..?)
Yes, use something other than IE. In Opera it opens a new window.
> My second
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 2:57:57 AM, Thomas wrote:
> (which I hate myself), you will need to see it correctly. I like what
> TB does: you can toggle HTML Autoview off/on, but it will *not*
> connect you to web page or whatever. This prevents trojans or whatever
> to invade your system. I wouldn't
Bialystok/PL, 2000-01-09
Hello Owen,
OC> This may simply be a RTFineM, but when I click on a URL in a mail,
OC> De Bat! always opens it in my most recent IE (5) browser window.
OC> I'd really prefer it to
Just to clarify things for my tiny mind - if the auto-wrap option is
ticked within Options -> Editor Preferences, all incoming mail should
be wrapped regardless of window size? Does this option have any
connection with the character encoding as well?
I just wished I could get the darn
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:27:47 +0300, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
[..snip..]
AM>> b) Upon creation, the filter rule is added by default to the
AM>> bottom of the list of filter rules. Since the proper functioning
AM>> of the filter may depend on where it lies in the filter list, this
AM>> may create
In Reference to "Newbie Stuff" From Steve Lamb:
SL> Not that this helps for people, like me, who have to C&P off the HTML side
SL> (which TB! doesn't do) and it insists on showing the HTML side when I click
SL> over to the "text" version.
You'll love this Steve All of what you state abo
In Reference to "Wish item?" From Owen Carter:
OC> This may simply be a RTFineM, but when I click on a URL in a mail, De
OC> Bat! always opens it in my most recent IE (5) browser window. I'd
OC> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
OC> force this? is there a key-combo
Hallo Steve,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 04:06:32 -0800 GMT (09.01.2000, 20:06 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
>> force this? is there a key-combo? or is it beyond the bat!s control (a
>> M$ 'enhancement'..?)
SL> Yes, use something o
In Reference to "Wish list from a new user of The Bat" From Steve Lamb:
SL> I hope they neither read nor follow anything from Microsoft. MS has not
SL> built anything decent, ever.
They have built themselves one hell of a bottom line. ;-)
--
- Nick
Nick Danger's Complimentary Curse <(©¿
Hallo Steve,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 04:08:02 -0800 GMT (09.01.2000, 20:08 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> (which I hate myself), you will need to see it correctly. I like what
>> TB does: you can toggle HTML Autoview off/on, but it will *not*
>> connect you to web page or whatever. This prevents tr
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 09:48:10PM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> H. Here I can copy to clickboard from the HTML version of the
> email (and thus paste to somewhere else). I can click on the other tab
> on the bottom of the email and see only the text version.
Then you're lucky. I get
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 2:57:57 AM, you wrote:
TF> Hallo Douglas,
TF> On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 15:01:52 -0600 GMT (09.01.2000, 05:01 +0800 GMT),
TF> Douglas Hinds wrote:
When you subscribe to things nowadays, sometimes you're given a
choice of HTML of plain text but most o
Hello Alexander V. Kiselev,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:25:01 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 3:25:01 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Alexander> Hi there!
Alexander> On 8 Jan 00, at 22:24, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote
Alexander> about "Mailing Li
Hello Oliver Sturm,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 21:08:52 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 3:08:52 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Oliver Sturm wrote:
Oliver> --
Oliver> %make love
PLEASE donot post the rest of that manual (g)
Oliver> Make: Don't know how to make love. Stop.
Ol
Hello Allie Martin,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 20:17:56 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 8:17:56 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Allie> *pouting and frowning*
Allie> See you all soon... AFTER this gets fixed. Till then, everyone keep on
emailing cos I am
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:20:16 + GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 9:20:16 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> Hi Allie,
Marck> IOW I don't really know what to do about it until Syafril comes back
Marck> on site i
Hello Werner Arts,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:00:57 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 5:00:57 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Werner Arts wrote:
Werner> Hi MDaemon,
Werner> What's the hell is this?
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Message-
Sunday, January 09, 2000
Hello Bat-users,
A while ago someone had this problem and I had this problem today.
That Italian box I mentioned before found its way back to me..
Totally unstable and after I replaced the motherboard it was worse.
Considering I expected to be paid for an hours w
Hello Quin Selman,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 20:43:23 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 10:43:23 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Quin Selman wrote:
Quin> Hello tracer,
Quin> Saturday, January 08, 2000, 6:03:12 PM, you wrote:
t>> There is now an English New Year present for th
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:48:29 + GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 10:48:29 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck> More than that ... it was the cause IMHO! It looks to the server as if
Marck> the list was the sender of
Hello Andrew K. Lovetski,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:27:47 +0300 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 3:27:47 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
Andrew> Hello, The Bat Users!
TF - "Kill file". Right clicking on a message automatically sets
TF up a
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:25:51 -0800 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:25:51 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve> Friday, January 07, 2000, 7:19:35 PM, John wrote:
>> I hope they read Microsoft's documents on good Object Model design,
>> an
Hello Andrew,
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 12:22:37 PM, you wrote:
AKL> Hello, The Bat Users!
T>> I created a manual filter that will move read messages to my specified
T>> folder. So when I get new mail, I read them all and then issue the
T>> "Re-filter" command in the folder menu. When the r
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 2:26:34 AM, Owen wrote:
>> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
>> force this? is there a key-combo? or is it beyond the bat!s control (a
>> M$ 'enhancement'..?)
Steve replied:
> Yes, use something other than IE. In Opera it opens a n
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 08:43:49PM +0700, tracer wrote:
> No idea, I use one filter per mailing list and send them to folders
> in an account which will never dial out or in called mailing lists...
> As far as I can see you have no way of getting all mailing lists in
> one go and if you could it
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 07:55:45AM -0600, Nick Danger wrote:
> They have built themselves one hell of a bottom line. ;-)
So does a professional killer, doesn't mean either of them should be
emulated.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 09:41:09PM +0700, tracer wrote:
> The only thing which almost always works...
Never hardlocked your machine, I take it? Or had windows intercept it and
cheerily tell you you're waiting for Windows to display the right dialog...
yet have windows lock so it never will?
Hello Oliver,
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 12:08:52 PM, you wrote:
OS> Hi Douglas Hinds,
OS> On Samstag, 8. Januar 2000 at 20:54:38 you wrote:
OS> I've started to receive loads of this stuff again. I thought that
OS> problem had been solved?
>> What does this indicate? That something I se
Hello Michal,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 4:12:52 AM, you wrote:
MK>Bialystok/PL, 2000-01-09
MK> Hello Owen,
OC>> This may simply be a RTFineM, but when I click on a URL in a mail,
OC>> De Bat! always op
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 10:13:20 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
AM>> Whenever the server generates a Mailer Daemon message, a copy is
AM>> mailed to all subscribers. I doubt that you're the cause of them
AM>> however. I get them as well.
> Hmmm. I don't seem to get them :-/. I have had them, b
Hello Steve,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 4:06:32 AM, you wrote:
SL> Sunday, January 09, 2000, 2:26:34 AM, Owen wrote:
>> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
>> force this? is there a key-combo? or is it beyond the bat!s control (a
>> M$ 'enhancement'..?)
SL> Yes,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:48:42 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
> You also should put a sig delimiter, have the sig less than 5 lines,
> write in English, use proper spelling, quote properly, do not ramble on
> excessively, not flame someone, etc.
> I do not advocate the computer making
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:37:17 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Uhm, no, it isn't. When I move a message from the inbox in
> morpheus@rpglink to slamb3@corp the message is physically moved. It is not
> "linked" in any way to either account aside from its physical location.
What Alex and oth
Hallo Steve,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 06:00:58 -0800 GMT (09.01.2000, 22:00 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> H. Here I can copy to clickboard from the HTML version of the
>> email (and thus paste to somewhere else). I can click on the other tab
>> on the bottom of the email and see only the text v
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:34:32 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
SL>> Yes, use something other than IE. In Opera it opens a new window.
> In Netscape it uses the previously open window. So I open a new window
> first, go back to TB, and then click on the link. An option "open link
> i
Hello Allie,
Saturday, January 08, 2000, 4:58:38 AM, you wrote:
AM> On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 00:49:02 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> It's one thing to have a popup message appear only when you
>>> failed to do something rather than have it appear anytime you wish to
>>> do something. IOW compar
Hi tracer,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, at 21:41:09 [GMT +0700] you wrote:
Steve>> I hope they neither read nor follow anything from Microsoft. MS has not
Steve>> built anything decent, ever.
> They did: Control-Alt-Delete.
> The only thing which almost always works...
Nope. In my days of using
In Reference to "Wish list from a new user of The Bat" From Steve Lamb:
>> They have built themselves one hell of a bottom line. ;-)
SL> So does a professional killer, doesn't mean either of them should be
SL> emulated.
Ah, a paid assassin! Isn't that what Janet Reno is?
(oops, way OT now,
Hello dMb,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:47:10 AM, you wrote:
d> Sunday, January 09, 2000, 2:26:34 AM, Owen wrote:
>>> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
>>> force this? is there a key-combo? or is it beyond the bat!s control (a
>>> M$ 'enhancement'..?)
d> Steve r
Hello tracer,
t> what about making the server a list member???
I love it, then it could spam itself!
--
Thanks, John
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team
Hallo Allie,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 10:01:11 -0500 GMT (09.01.2000, 23:01 +0800 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> In Netscape it uses the previously open window. So I open a new window
>> first, go back to TB, and then click on the link. An option "open link
>> in new browser window" (upon right-clicking
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 1:55, Keith Russell wrote
about "The Bat! vs. Pegasus vs. PMMail":
> There have been several discussions here comparing TB to various
> other email clients, including Pegasus, PMMail, Calypso, Eudora,
> Poco, and others.
>
> As far as I know, none of th
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 3:24, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Wish list from a new user of Th":
> > It would appear to me that people are not seeing the obvious. There
> > is a way to fill both needs, and that's through the appropriate use of
> > plug ins.
>
> Plug-ins are not the end-al
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 21:34, Thomas Fernandez wrote
about "Re: Wish item?":
> SL> Yes, use something other than IE. In Opera it opens a new window.
>
> In Netscape it uses the previously open window. So I open a new window
> first, go back to TB, and then click on the link. An opti
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 21:33, tracer wrote
about "Re[2]: (OT) http://www.dials.ru/dsa":
> t>> There is now an English New Year present for those who couldnt get
> t>> Alex's Russian version to work...
> t>> http://www.dials.ru/dsav/english/2000/00_index.htm
>
> Quin> The links don't wor
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 0:50, Keith Russell wrote
about "Re: Default Translation settings?":
> > Seems that what I and you experience is somewhat the same, only for *me*
> > the Encoding item in the main menu is always set to ISO-8859-1 (why??? I
> > don't use this encoding...), and for
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 4:02, Steve Lamb wrote
about "Re: Mailing List filters":
> Saturday, January 08, 2000, 12:25:01 PM, Alexander wrote:
> > You got it right. Just Steve is dreaming aloud, as it's characteristic for him;-)
>
> Hey now, I thought it was characteristic of me to bas
FW>> And good luck solving the Mailer Daemon problem.
> Q: Those of you experiencing the problem - what Reply-To address are
> you *stating* for posting to the list? N.B. It should be your own
> address, not that of TBUDL.
My own - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Never, ever use repetitive redunda
Hello all, I've just verified the link. It's:
ftp://ftp.dials.ru/dsav/english/2000/
The program (Dr.Web) itself is:
ftp://ftp.dials.ru/dsav/english/2000/!drw32ey.exe
ADinf is:
ftp://ftp.dials.ru/dsav/english/2000/!ad32ey.exe
--
SY, Alex
(St.Petersburg, Russia)
http://mph.phys.spbu.ru/~akis
Steve wrote:
> Then you don't know regex, do you? Here's the perlized version to catch
> all lists off listar, majordomo and LSERV.
> if (($line =~ m/^X-List: (.*)/) ||
> ($line =~ m/^Sender: owner-(.*)@/) ||
> ($line =~ m/^Sender: (.*)-owner@/)){
> $filter_to = $account/Mailing L
Steve wrote:
> BTW, CNTL-ALT-DEL in NT is to login.
Grrr.
I thought that this was a joke when I first saw it.
But let's not even go there.
Derek, who still has a problem pressing those keys when logging on at
work.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -'95 Concours
DoD #1359 COG #2103 SR #772 AEE
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:35:39 AM, Allie wrote:
> BTW: Although the RFC was good information, it was a refute to a point I
> didn't make. I specifically said that the subject inclusion was not a must
> and that it was proper. Netiquette guidelines instruct you on what you
> should do, not what
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:53:34 AM, Allie wrote:
> What Alex and others have been getting at is that when you move the message
> and create a reply, it will use the parameters of the account and folder to
> which you moved it and not that of the account and folder which you moved it
> from.
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:54:34 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Where are the usernames you need to C&P? IMHO if they are in the
> message body, there should be difference from normal text.
There isn't.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 51073
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 8:39:11 AM, dMb wrote:
> Once you've filtered all your mailing list messages into a
> folder/account, do you then filter them again into separate
> subfolders, one for each list?
Yes. Mailing list, subfolder for each mailing list.
> I realize that each additional f
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 23:39:29 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
AM>> It is IE and Netscape that should provide you the ability to do
AM>> this and not TB!.
> When I right-click on a link in TB, you have an option "open this
> link". If I right-click a link in Netscape, I also have
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, January 08, 2000 you wrote:
>> Besides: it takes AGES for a page to load and makes it rather uncomfortable
>> to read the messages.
Exactly. That's why I hate all web based cr[censored] -- web email,
web forums, chats and so on.
>> The other thing is: I can't ac
Hello Andreas,
On Saturday, January 08, 2000 you wrote:
> Hello Marcel, Hamburg/GER, Saturday, January 08, 2000
> in your mail dated Saturday, January 08, 2000, 01:36,
> you whispered something about "(No Subject)":
MS>> take care
> I'll do! ;-)
Isn't this something to
Hello Steve,
SL> Which is personalities and does break the paradigm of TB!. Why people
SL> want to mungle everything together is utterly beyond me.
You keep referring to "Paradigm", which means model or pattern
(yes, I know you know the meaning), usually the original pattern
comes from the
Alexander wrote:
>> In Netscape it uses the previously open window. So I open a new window
>> first, go back to TB, and then click on the link. An option "open link
>> in new browser window" (upon right-clicking) would come in handy.
> In Netscape this behaviour is configurable via the prefs.js
Hallo Steve,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:50:32 -0800 GMT (10.01.2000, 00:50 +0800 GMT),
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Where are the usernames you need to C&P? IMHO if they are in the
>> message body, there should be difference from normal text.
SL> There isn't.
Right. As Ali's cookie says: Always proofre
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:50:15 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> What Alex and others have been getting at is that when you move the
>> message and create a reply, it will use the parameters of the account
>> and folder to which you moved it and not that of the account and folder
>> which you moved it fro
Hallo Christopher,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 22:48:18 +0100 GMT (09.01.2000, 05:48 +0800 GMT),
Christopher J. Trybowski wrote:
CJT> Isn't this something to be taken care of by the server? I mean that
CJT> when the massage is send to TBUDL.UNSUB address, it shouldn't be
CJT> sent to TBUDL/TBBE
On Sunday, January 09, 2000, 8:53:41 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Sunday, January 09, 2000, 8:39:11 AM, dMb wrote:
>> Once you've filtered all your mailing list messages into a
>> folder/account, do you then filter them again into separate
>> subfolders, one for each list?
> Yes. Mailing list,
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Michael,
R>> use "groupname "
R>> that should do the trick :-)
R>> (groupname is the 'handle' you gave the group in the adress-book)
R>>
Hello Allie,
Actually this makes me wonder -how- the browser is invoked? Is it via
a 'com' call or some other Windows jiggerypokery, or is it a
command-line style invocation?
I'm so out of touch with how Windows is doing this stuff nowadays
(Unix geek), but it seems to me that maybe it would be
On Sunday 9 January 2000 Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> On 9 Jan 00, at 3:24, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Plug-ins are not the end-all, be-all answer, trust me.
I agree here. After all, the logical extension of this is the null
application which does *nothing* other that to make calls to its
plug-ins
Hi there!
On 9 Jan 00, at 9:11, Moosebreath wrote
about "Re[2]: Pegasus vs. The Bat!":
> SL> Which is personalities and does break the paradigm of TB!. Why people
> SL> want to mungle everything together is utterly beyond me.
>
> You keep referring to "Paradigm", which means model or p
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 09:38:30 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>> Yes. Mailing list, subfolder for each mailing list.
> Steve, what is the theory/purpose behind filtering all Mailing List mail
> to one main Folder, and then re-filtering from there to your various other
> List-specific Folders... t
Hi Christopher,
On 08 January 2000 at 22:48:18 GMT +0100 (which was 21:48 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
MS>>> take care
>> I'll do! ;-)
CJT> Isn't this something to be taken care of by the server? I mean that
CJT> when the massage is send to TBUDL.UNS
On Sunday 9 January 2000 Owen Carter wrote:
> Actually this makes me wonder -how- the browser is invoked? Is it via
> a 'com' call or some other Windows jiggerypokery, or is it a
> command-line style invocation?
There are basically four ways to launch the browser. The first is
directly via the co
Hello Allie,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 9:27:08 AM, you wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:50:15 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> A good analog of what I'm talking about is the search facility.
If I understand you correctly, essentially you want to be able to
create folders which, when selected
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 22:06:32 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
> Just look what he says: he calls "virtual folders" idea "personalities paradigm".
> He doesn't even care to think it over! He never saw DOS navigator with its
> Temp panel, he never saw FAR that utilises the same idea
On Sunday, January 09, 2000, 11:10:50 AM, Allie Martin wrote:
> No, not a redundant step at all. It allows him to read all mailing
> list mail in one central location and then they are filtered to their
> respective subfolders.
Oh, I see. Alright, then the messages that would be re-filte
Hello TBUDL,
On Sunday, January 09, 2000, , Owen Carter wrote:
> This may simply be a RTFineM, but when I click on a URL in a mail, De
> Bat! always opens it in my most recent IE (5) browser window. I'd
> really prefer it to spawn a new window instead. Is there a way to
> force this? is there a
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:26:38 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, essentially you want to be able to
> create folders which, when selected, perform a predefined search on
> your message database, right? If that's all there is to it, I could
> see that having huge pot
Hello tracer,
Sunday, January 09, 2000, 6:34:56 AM, you wrote:
> what about making the server a list member???
I think it's to prevent external spam. At least I remember Syafril
mentioning something to that effect.
--
Thanks for writing
Januk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.38e
und
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:34:57 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
>> It's easier to just read messages from 1 folder instead of eight.
> Hmmm... perhaps... to some. Personally, I would find it confusing to start
> reading 500 messages from 8 different Mailing Lists in one folder.
Well, ce
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
