Hello Jonathan,
On Monday, May 23, 2005 at 5:30:54 AM Jonathan [JA] wrote:
I want to be totally invisible and untraceable. If I'm browsing the web,
I'm using a
tunnel (proxy server 127.0.0.1:8080) that totally hides my identify (IP
address) ...
SMN ...are you really sure you are
Hallo Dougie,
On Sun, 22 May 2005 23:39:44 +0100GMT (23-5-2005, 0:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DC Cheers.
DC Dougie
Douglas Coull, Langbank, Scotland
Lat 55.92445 N Long 4.59753 W
DC www.doug-coull.co.uk
DC http://douglas-coull.fotopic.net
moderator
Note: This
Hello Claude,
Sunday, May 22, 2005, 1:21:29 PM, you wrote:
C What a good idea : I hope some of the moderators will read this and
C do the necessary ...
Do what??? TBUDP is a Wiki, that means that once you register there,
you're allowed to add content to it yourself. It's a community effort
to
Hi Folks,
This one's been bugging me for a while.
No matter what I've tried, when BAT starts up, it gives me the message
'.EML files are not associated with the BAT' and I then have to change the
association.
I'm sure it's a setting somewher that I've missed, or another
application keeps taking
Hi Roelof,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 11:22:18 AM, you wrote:
RO instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Dougie.
OK, thanks for the heads up, and I don't feel singled out :-)
Cheers.
Dougie
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL'
Hi Dougie,
on Mon, 23 May 2005 15:22:03 +0100GMT (23.05.2005, 16:22 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
DC This one's been bugging me for a while.
DC No matter what I've tried, when BAT starts up, it gives me the message
DC '.EML files are not associated with the BAT' and I then have to change the
DC
Hello TB List,
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
--
Ciao
Thomas
Using: TheBat! 3.5
System: Windows XP Build 2600 Service Pack 2
PGP:Key-ID: 0x70D9F03B
Visit: TheBat! World on
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 12:55 -0300 you wrote about PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is
another way, Allie
Hi Tony,
On 23/5/2005 4:59 PM +0100, you wrote:
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is
another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try
enabling email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems.
LOL!!!
I'd try the usual way
Hello Tony,
On 23 May 2005, 16:59 you wrote:
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there is
another way, Allie will shout at me for telling you this but try enabling
email proxy in PGP9. It works here with no problems.
Does this explain why your message ID is always
Hello Jonathan,
On 23 May 2005 at 22:30:54 GMT -0500 (which was 05:30:54 where I
live), Jonathan Angliss wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of Anonymous emails?:
Hi Peter Palmreuther,
On Sunday, May 22, 2005, you wrote:
Hello St,
On Sunday, May 22, 2005 at 5:40:50 PM St
Hello Dougie,
Any thoughts?
does you use a further installation of TB! whit parameter /reg: ?
I have this problem if I use the second installation of TheBat! at the
same time. Apparent the following reg values are changed automatically
by using TB!
Check .msg association
Check .eml
Hi Peter Palmreuther,
On Monday, May 23, 2005, you wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
On Monday, May 23, 2005 at 5:30:54 AM Jonathan [JA] wrote:
I want to be totally invisible and untraceable. If I'm
browsing the web, I'm using a
tunnel (proxy server 127.0.0.1:8080) that totally hides my identify (IP
Hi Martin,
On 23/5/2005 5:19 PM +0100, you wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP
address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a
message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g.
Hello Allie,
On 23 May 2005, 17:39 you wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]? Or is this the IP
address assigned by your router? Either way, TB! can't locate a
message with this type of ID. Same goes for Allie's messages, e.g.
Hello Martin Webster on tbudl everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 18:46 you (Martin Webster on tbudl) wrote:
.. and here I was liking it, since my domain name isn't included in the
message id. :(
Do these IP-based message IDs work with *cough* mU1b3rry?
:-)
Sorry to hijack this thread, I
Hello Thomas Fernandez everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 06:01 you (Thomas Fernandez) wrote:
V You should learn to live your life that you should be able to face
V yourself, whatever you do, or whatever mistakes you are doing during
V your life.
Generally true, as long as you live in a
Hello Steve Caine everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 05:01 you (Steve Caine) wrote:
Though not directly related to TB, a warning about Google Desktop since
many of you are using Opera as their browser: once you installed Google
Desktop search, you can't access the normal Google webpages thru
Hi Alexander,
-- 23.05.2005 18:53 +0200:
I just created an IMAP account in TB
Nice middle name. ;)
Threading seems okay.
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Alexander,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 6:53:05 PM, you wrote:
Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply somewhere
using
So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a client
instead...
--
Best regards,
Alexandermailto:[EMAIL
Hello Martin.
--On 23 May 2005 17:19 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by
my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you?
--
Hello Allie.
--On 23 May 2005 11:12 -0500 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it
worked. I did nothing else. shrug
Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law
abiding, looking after under
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:07 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by
my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you?
The
Hello Manuel Breitfeld everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:04 you (Manuel Breitfeld) wrote:
I just created an IMAP account in TB
Nice middle name. ;)
Just to keep them apart.
Threading seems okay.
Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that
the distant sound
Hi Alexander,
-- 23.05.2005 19:07 +0200:
and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that
the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-)
Long before Tony in trial period. ;)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Current
Hello Tony,
on Monday, 23. May 2005, at 16:59:55 [GMT +0100] you wrote regarding
PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I tried it as well and The Bat! won't work with PGP9. However there
Hello Alexander,
On 23 May 2005, 18:10 you wrote:
Does this explain why your message ID is always something like
No, that's nothing to do with PGP. That IP is the one issued to this PC by
my router... You don't want me to get rid of that as well do you?
To answer Tony's message first... I
Hello Tony,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 7:04:12 PM, you wrote:
However, for me, I had simply installed PGP9 and then opened TB! and it
worked. I did nothing else. shrug
TB Just exactly what have I done to deserve this?
TB I'm a good person,
OK...
TB law abiding,
Nice...
TB looking after under
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I'm a 11 customer just like Tony, and I just created an IMAP account in
TB to access my mails see if they thread or not
Like I said, they will. The Bat! doesn't yet handle IMAP the way it should
but
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 18:53 +0200 you wrote about Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Sorry to hijack this thread, I just had to place a reply somewhere using
the IMAP account I just created. I'm a 11 customer just like Tony, and I
just created an IMAP account in TB to access my mails see
Hello Manuel.
--On 23 May 2005 19:04 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Threading seems okay.
Your not listening to me are you?
--
Tony.
M.
Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 19:06 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
So... it threads just fine... using the same provider... but TB as a
client instead...
This one will thread OK as well, not with TB! as a client.
--
Tony.
M.
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 19:07 +0200 you wrote about Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that
the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-)
No, why would I need to do that? Your the one who's not playing the
Hi Tony,
-- 23.05.2005 18:52 +0100:
Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it
will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway.
Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at all.
Therefore it can't be threading in any way.
--
Hello Thomas.
--On 23 May 2005 14:24 -0300 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support
for PGP 9 in the future?
That's one for the developers.
Oh look, it threads :)
--
Tony.
M.
Hi Tony,
-- 23.05.2005 18:56 +0100:
Threading seems okay.
Your not listening to me are you?
I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question.
I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas
TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 19:52 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
Tell me Alex, does this one thread properly? If I'm right, I suspect it
will and I#ve not doctored the headers in anyway.
No threading at all.
Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 19:07 +0200 you wrote about Re[4]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Your message, too... and you're using Mulberry... u... (eh? was that
the distant sound of Tony banging his head onto a wall? ;-)
Why don't people listen? He uses Mulberry yes, he doesn't however use
Hallo Vili,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 13:39:28 +0200GMT (23-5-2005, 13:39 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TBS Dick is living, I guess, in the Netherlands. That should be considered
TBS democracy.
Don't know that for sure. I've heard things about a referendum, but
the final vote of Parliament is
Hallo Dougie,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 15:22:03 +0100GMT (23-5-2005, 16:22 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DC Any thoughts?
DC Cheers.
DC Dougie
DC
DC Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
moderator
Note: Though this moderator's
Hallo Dougie,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 15:17:51 +0100GMT (23-5-2005, 16:17 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Dougie.
DC OK, thanks for the heads up, and I don't feel singled out :-)
In stead of being funny, you could adjust your templates to
Hello Mark.
--On 23 May 2005 19:38 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
TB don't do sex much either.
Oh-Oh must be the lying that does it! :-)
OK, you got me. But only 4 or 5 times a week, nothing like when I was
younger.
I do have the odd glass of red wine or 3 every night as
Hello Manuel.
--On 23 May 2005 20:00 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Me is not Alex, but unfortunatelly your message has *no* references at
all. Therefore it can't be threading in any way.
Don't you start, I thought you was on my side :)
--
Tony.
M.
PGP.sig
Hello Martin.
--On 23 May 2005 18:33 +0100 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Also, will you try Mulberry with 11?
If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is
in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same
problems.
--
Tony.
M.
Hello Manuel.
--On 23 May 2005 20:03 +0200 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I am, Tony, I am. Just wanted to confirm Alex' question.
I know that Mulberry gets the wrong information from your server whereas
TB! doesn't fetch the information from the server and does everything on
Hello Alexander.
--On 23 May 2005 20:09 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
No threading at all.
After this post I promise my threading will be OK.
Well, the one thing I learn from this is... I'll keep my hands off of
IMAP. With all those different (buggy) server types that need
Hello Tony,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 12:38:13 PM, you wrote:
T OK, you got me. But only 4 or 5 times a week, nothing like when I
T was younger.
T I do have the odd glass of red wine or 3 every night as well... But
T I don't go down the Pub, honest!
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is
Hello Tony Boom everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 20:34 you (Tony Boom) wrote:
Also, will you try Mulberry with 11?
If he does try Mulberry with 1and1 IMAP then we must remember his server is
in Germany, mine is in England... They may not be affected by the same
problems.
Nah, I won't
Hello Leif.
--On 23 May 2005 12:44 -0600 you wrote about OT: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
Please don't feel singled out Tony.
You just got the hump 'cos I get my leg over more than you :)
--
Tony.
M.
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
Current
ON Monday, May 23, 2005, 7:04:12 PM, you wrote:
TB Just exactly what have I done to deserve this? I'm a good person, law
TB abiding, looking after under privileged children, don't do drugs, don't go
TB to pubs, don't do sex much either. I must have been really bad in a
TB previous life!
Hi
Hello Gerard.
--On 23 May 2005 21:08 +0200 you wrote about Re: PGP 9 ans TheBat!:
I don know but you are missing a lot of the fun things ;-)
Shhh, can't stop, kids are all in bed asleep. Must get on... If you'll
excuse the pun :)
And stop baiting me, I've already been trouted twice.
--
On Sunday, May 22, 2005, Steve Caine cleverly scripted:
I can confirm, though, that it works fine with Firefox 1.0.4. I'm
using that as my browser along with The Bat! 3.0.1.33 and Google
Desktop Search The Bat! Version: 1.0.0.7.
Greetings Steve and All, 14:34, Monday, May
Hello Gary Lucas everyone else,
on 23-Mai-2005 at 21:53 you (Gary Lucas) wrote:
I re-indexed four times before the count of mail messages appeared to
asymptote on the GDS status page, so the plugin still needs some
tweaking. However, the searches are quick once the indexes are in place.
Hi
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 at 2:22:07 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Danger
wrote:
You know, I kinda like something to separate the different accounts
Colour groups do the job nicely. See attached.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
A closed mouth gathers no foot
Hi Thomas,
On 23/5/2005 2:24 PM -0300, you wrote:
Hm, somebody knows if in there will be a plugin or an internal support
for PGP 9 in the future?
I had it working fine in TB! just before removing it for other reasons.
I think the current PGP support will tango with PGP9.
--
Allie Martin
On Monday, May 23, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz cleverly scripted:
I found it works best when you set it to index messages on exiting TB.
Greetings Alexander S. Kunz, 16:06, Monday, May 23, 2005
Yes, that's the way it is supposed to work, but it seems to need help
getting started.
Hello,
What is the file name where the quick template information is kept?
Would copying that file be a possible way to transfer a bunch of QT's
from one installation to another? (work to home)
Thanks,
--
t'hy'la,
ò¸ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: The Bat! v3.5]
[OS: Windows XP 5 1]
On Monday, May 23, 2005 at 10:55:35 AM [GMT -0500], Thomas Martin wrote:
Just installed PGP 9 and it seams that the internal support for PGP 9 is
not working. Any hints, or am i missing something.
I had initially had it working. This was when I had previously had PGP8
installed, and then ran
Hallo Nick,
On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:07:43 -0500GMT (23-5-2005, 23:07 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ND What is the file name where the quick template information is kept?
account.qtn
It's account specific, so when you've got multiple accounts, you can
have more account.qtn files.
ND Would
59 matches
Mail list logo
