Hello Mica,
>> However - Knoppix 5.5.1 is not there.
> Sorry for making you busy for nothing
It wasn't for nothing and didn't take long.
> and confused,
Confused? Never!
> it was my typo, and even twice. I espied it but was too late. So,
> the 5.0.1 is most recent version, 5.5.1 doesn't exis
Hello Mica,
DH>> That's why I have my OS's and Applications in different partitions.
DH>> (Data too).
> This schema with three main partitions (OS | Programs | Data/Documents)
> is the best/safest way. Many professionals find it as best solution too.
> Often is done further division of the Data
MM>>> And when I tried a v. 3.85 MSI install, Windows told me it
MM>>> could not do that.
DH>> B Gates could be the devil.
> Well, the impulse to control/"rule" just everything and yet due to
> greediness is a demonic property, yes. Some call them "hungry spirits",
Insatiable and born and raise
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 12:54:16 PM, you wrote:
> Well, I recently updated to FF2.0 - and realised then that I should have
> removed the old 1.5 installation before. I did that afterwards, and now
> half of the FF2.0 installation is a mess (I think I have to install 2.0
>
Hello Mary, Mica, Alex and anyone else following this thread.
>>> You could try to make a full backup from within TB, uninstall the
>>> program completely, and then reinstall from the new MSI (and then
>>> restore the backup) to cure the problem once and for all.
>> Unless the problem is with m
Hello Mica,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 10:38:52 AM, you wrote:
>> And Winrar still says the file is corrupt.
> Give up the Winrar, it can't deal with .msi files.
Maybe the latest version does.
>>> Then you'll see thebat.exe inside, so you can just drag and drop
>>> it where you wish.
>> You
Hello Alexander et. al.,
Wednesday, December 6, 2006, 10:28:16 AM, you wrote:
>> I am using TB! Pro v. 3.51.10 on WinXP with no service packs and
>> when I double click on the file thebat_pro_3-85-03.msi the
>> computer enters a loop that requires me to reboot.
> Something may be corrupt with t
e the 3.51.10 thebat.exe with the
new one right?
If that's the case, why don't you just send the thebat.exe file for
the newest stable version to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
As for the tbot posts I owe you, due to their length and other
commitments I am going to have wait a bit before a
some updates were able to be realized by
replacing the principle .exe file only.
TIA,
--
Douglas Hinds
P.S.
Windows updates don't work for me either for some reason and
frankly, I not very keen in giving M$ greater access to my system
anyway.
__
Dave wrote:
>> ... I also don't find for the pop-server the possibility to set
>> "SSL"!
> In TB! it's called TLS. Does this screenshot help?
> http://www.dave31175.com/gmail.gif
That's all it took. Thanks.
--
Douglas
Current version is 3.8
n't that many) I added.
(Since this has nothing to do with TB!, you might want to answer off
tbudl or move it to tbot).
--
Douglas Hinds
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Mary and others following this thread,
In response to the message Mary Bull sent to Allie on 14/07/2004
regarding Changing the Subject Header (sent with a Subject Header
"Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v.
2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])"
Since the focus
Hello Mary and others following this thread,
In response to the message Mary Bull sent regarding "Time to Upgrade
(Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v. 2.11.02 [was Re:
Time to Upgrade?])"
Thanks for the note re the v. 2.12 release. As you'd said earlier,
it was about to be released
Hello Allie and others following this thread,
In response to the message Allie Martin sent on 13/07/2004 regarding
"Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v.
2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])"
AM>>> From there new matches are dynamically added as the real
AM>>> folders
Hello Mary and others following this thread,
In response to the message Mary Bull sent on 13/07/2004 regarding
"Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v.
2.11.02 [was Re: Time to Upgrade?])"
DH>> ... What *are* your needs and how does v. 2 do a better job of
DH>> meeting
Hello Allie, Andre, Mary and others following this thread,
Thanks to all those who've take the time to respond.
BTW, is *anyone+ else still using TB! v 1.x?
In response to the message Allie Martin sent on 13/07/2004 regarding
"Time to Upgrade (Was: One caveat about Folder View Settings in v.
Hello Mary, Mic Cullen, Roelof and others following this thread,
In response to the reply Mary Bull sent on 13/07/2004 to my request
regarding "Time to Upgrade?]"
DH>> Is TB! v 2.11.02 (the latest release version) stable?
MB> Yes. it is stable. I've been using it for several weeks now.
MB> Th
v1.62 recommended, or would it be better
to install v 2 to a separate directory?
If the latter's the case, what's the best procedure for preserving my
folders, filters and account data?
TIA
Douglas Hinds
Current version is 2.11.02
Hello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Saturday, January 10, 2004, you responded to my query:
>> I intend to manage a mailing list and downloaded BatPost, RitLabs
>> email server.
tb> I manage some lists with The Bat and ADR, Advanced Direct Remailer.
tb> I
ption compared to other alternatives?
What is the appropriate source of support for it?
How important is the platform?
Are there other issues of which I should be aware?
TIA.
Douglas Hinds
Mexico
I already sent this once to TBOT and it came back in a visible form
but was apparently not visib
e wheel utility for Windows
http://kickme.to/katmouse
http://eduard.hiti.bei.t-online.de/
--
Douglas Hinds
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello, Kitty, Simon & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Thursday, November 6, 2003, Simon said in response to your
saying:
K>> So, I must look at alternatives.
That would like moving to another planet, or as Thomas desires, to
another t me / space continuum.
S> I really think
Hello Lex & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Monday, November 3, 2003, Lex wrote:
LT> Douglas, thanks a lot, I now got it completely, exactly what I wanted!
One thing I forgot to include.
You don't have to download spam to add it to your spam string file.
You can copy that info
Hello Lex & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Monday, November 3, 2003, you wrote:
LT> I was trying to find out how to create a spam rule that would work for
LT> all accounts when I found an answer of Douglas Hinds in the archives saying
LT> this:
>>>
Hello Michael & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Saturday, November 1, 2003, Michael responded to Jonathan Angliss
thusly:
>> As a small note, your email appears to be missing a signature
>> delimiter, or cut mark. This mark (shown just above my name) is
>> in the format of [dash
Hello Jonathan & other TB! list members following this thread,
Yesterday, Saturday, November 1, 2003, you responded to my
mentioning that:
>> I'm having trouble connecting to the ritlabs ftp site. Do you still
>> have the 1.63 Beta 5 file? If so and you care to send it, I have
>> winrar installe
e one or two which I want.
ctrl+2 will toggle all of them, so you'll want them to be all the same.
GW> Is there any way of causing them all to be deselected in the Receive
GW> column as a default?
You could use your own email address as a string in the Selective
Download Filter-
--
Hello Michael & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, you wrote:
MSG> I just purchased v2 to get in under the October 31 deadline.
So did I.
MSG> I gave all my credit card information and clicked register. I got a sheet
MSG> to print out showing my order
Hello Paul & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, you wrote:
PC> I used 1.63 Beta 5 until the 2.0 betas came out. The reason I used that
PC> one was because it was the last of the stable betas BEFORE they
PC> introduced all the new features and bugs..
Hello Mark & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, you wrote:
MW> I use my mail15 account with TB all the time. No special configuration
MW> necessary - it worked from the first time I tried it.
Could you tell me exactly how you have your transport configu
Hello Melissa & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, you replied to my claim that:
>> Upgrades rarely cost the same as an original purchase.
IBM's Speech Recognition software is another opprobrious exception,
and they won't even provide a discount when purc
Hello Thomas & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, Thomas wrote:
TF> [Plugins]
TF>>> So far, all of them are free. However, the download sites seem to be
TF>>> all over the place, they are not centralised at Ritlabs, because they
TF>>> are all still in bet
Hello Thomas & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, Thomas wrote to say:
DH What kind of plugins?
TF>>> Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus.
DH>> These are plugins designed specifically for TB!?
TF> Yes. By TB users.
I see. By TB users using TB! for email w/
Hello Thomas & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003 you wrote:
MW>>> 1.63 allows for the use of plugins,
DH>> What kind of plugins?
TF> Anti-Spam and Anti-Virus.
These are plugins designed specifically for TB!? Or do v. 1.63 and
2.x use plugins made for M
Hello Mark & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, you explained:
MW> 1.63 allows for the use of plugins,
What kind of plugins?
MW> which you're not using anyway in
MW> 1.62.
Just the AVG plugin.
MW> That's about it, except for some SmartBat / scheduling
Hello Mark & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, Mark responded to my question:
DH>> Does this mean v. 2 can be installed without replacing (along side
DH>> of) v. 1.x?
MW> Yes. I've gone back and forth several times (and expect to do more of
MW> the same)
Thanks to all those that responded to my info request:
DH> October and the half price offer for current TB! users are coming to
DH> a close. Can anyone give a good reason why I should upgrade? And is
DH> the current version stable?
Including but not limited to MAU, Melissa, Peter Meyns, Neal
Lau
Hello Jim & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, you wrote:
DH>> October and the half price offer for current TB! users are coming to
DH>> a close. Can anyone give a good reason why I should upgrade? And is
DH>> the current version stable?
JD> Perhaps v
Hello Melissa & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, you wrote in answer to my query:
>> Can anyone give a good reason why I should upgrade? And is the
>> current version stable?
MR> I seem to remember you posting this same question yesterday, and you
MR>
Hello TB! listers,
October and the half price offer for current TB! users are coming to
a close. Can anyone give a good reason why I should upgrade? And is
the current version stable?
TIA,
Douglas
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" infor
Hello TB! listers,
October and the half price offer for current TB! users are coming to
a close. Can anyone give a good reason why I should upgrade? And is
the current version stable?
TIA,
Douglas
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" infor
Hello Allie & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Monday, September 22, 2003 Allie wrote the following post:
DH>> I use it to avoid viruses as well as a trigger for following up
DH>> on important mail. I don't want to be checking my high number
DH>> of mailbox directories and don't
Jurgen, I sent the following to TBUDL twice earlier and yet it
hasn't been posted. I wonder why. Two other posts I sent were
posted, so I'm not being blocked out. Maybe if you redirect it, it
will go through.
Douglas
Hello Jurgen & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Mond
Hello Jurgen & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Monday, September 22, 2003 Jurgen responded to my saying the
following:
>> I link all accounts to the same text file, which I continue to
>> lengthen whenever new Spam mongers are found. This is much easier
>> that adding strings to
Hello Allie & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Thursday, September 19, 2002 Allie wrote and said in response to
Marco:
M>> One of the really good features of The Bat is in my opinion the
M>> selective download. Especially when using a dial-up connection,
M>> you don't have to spe
Hello ken & other TB! list members following this thread,
On Sunday, September 21, 2003, you wrote:
kg> I guess I need to decide if I should switch all account to POP3
kg> or continue using IMAP and create a sorting rule that would
kg> delete unwanted messages from the server.
kg> Hmmm a
Hello TB! listers:
When the amount of mail left on the server on this account reached
six thousand plus, TB! quit downloading them. It would start counting
the messages, then cut out, repeatedly.
I had to install M$OE and use it to clear the server, which solved
the problem. I then imported the
Hello Steve and other TB! listers following this thread,
On Friday, July 18, 2003 at exactly 7:47:45 AM, Steve wrote about
"Trouble managing threads" and said the following:
SMS> I don't want to delete the entire folder, just all the messages in it.
SMS> If I mark all messages as read, can I t
Hello Matt and other TB! listers following this idiotic thread,
On Monday, July 21, 2003 at exactly 2:09:21 PM, Matt wrote about
Auke's multiple message titled "I've Asked Several Times" and said
the following:
MT> On Monday, July 21, 2003 @ 11:59:08 AM [-0700], Scrat wrote:
>> How many times i
Hello Omar and other TB! listers following this thread,
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at exactly 9:46:11 PM, Omar wrote about
"SMTP authentication problem" and said the following:
OC> I have two email accounts. One if of my ISP and the other from
OC> my webhost using my domain name. Both of them req
Hello Joseph,
Saturday, April 5, 2003 at 2:26 PM, you asked:
JN> Currently, when I dispatch mail on the server (POP), the 'receive'
JN> flag is always toggled on, i.e., the box is checked. I would like to
JN> set the default to leave that box unchecked. Is that possible? If so,
JN> how?
Once th
Hello Richard,
Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:46 AM, you continued this thread on
html, TB! & my suggestion:
>> That is not true. Here's how I do it (it's very simple):
>> 1).- The Mail Dispatcher will pull down as many lines as you set it
>> for (I download 25).
>> 2).- Selective Download wil
Hello Tim,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 5:15 PM, you too wrote regarding html mail:
T> Why not just view the plain text version if you don't like the HTML
T> version? The formatting junk at the beginning is annoying, but
T> bearable.
MB>> I greet it with a groan of dread. And I am not smiling.
Hello Richard,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:32 AM, you wrote in relation to the
new TB! html editor & html mail in general:
RW> I know people like it but I wish there was an option to strip all HTML
RW> mail instead of having to delete it manually. I know this has been
RW> discussed recently and
Hello Peter,
Sunday, January 5, 2003, 11:20:39 PM, you wrote:
PF> Douglas,
PF> On 05-01-2003 23:02, you [D] wrote in
PF> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
D>> Combine both and I can receive or not receive anything on the server,
D>> and I can revise anything programmed by Selective Dow
Hello Frank,
Sunday, January 5, 2003, you wrote about SpamPal:
JA>> I'm not sure how SpamPal works, but wouldn't it match on body as
JA>> well? As for just grabbing the headers, I think this might work:
JA>> Account - Properties - Mail Management
FL> SpamPal is essentially a read-only S
Hello Spyder,
Sunday, December 29, 2002, you wrote:
S> I use multiple email accounts (like 15 or so) with TheBat and would like some
S> better ways to manage them:
I too use a lot of accounts and have asked for global "Manager"
features for the ticker, columns, filters etc.
S> - make changes to
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, December 29, 2002 you asked:
>> I'm no expert on text editors, so I'd best ask. Can other editors:
>> Change text from All Caps to All Lower Case or First Letter Caps
>> with a 2 key keystroke combo?
TF> How do you do that? (Another feature I never knew of... ;-))
Saturday, December 28, Mark Evens wrote about "Model/view design for
text editor" and said:
ME> ... Some unix wizards love emacs because they have memorized all
ME> the magic keystrokes required to edit without touching a mouse.
ME> Most of us are not like that. We want our editors to do
ME> low-
Hello M.,
Saturday, December 14, 2002, 11:45:55 PM, you asked:
ME> After incoming mail is filtered it is moved. Let's say from Inbox to
ME> MyTopicFolder. Now I reply to a message in MyTopicFolder.
ME> The reply should be stored in MyTopicFolder, not in Sent Mail. How
ME> do I do that (for th
Victor asked:
VBG> I am writing a few reports on spam and would appreciate
VBG> anyones insight about how you can best battle it without
VBG> 3rd party plug-ins or applications and preferably with email
VBG> clients alone :)
I use the Selective Download filter combined with the Message
Dispatche
Hello Paul, Victor & other TB! users following this thread:
Paul recommended:
PC> ... you might try the Kerio firewall, it is a continuation of
PC> TPF ( Tiny personal firewall). It is free for personal use.
PC> www.kerio.com
The download url is:
http://www.kerio.com/dwn/kpf2-en-win.exe
--
Do
Hello David,
Monday, December 9, 2002, 5:42:30 PM, you responded to my comment:
DH>> I can't find a link on either Grisoft's or Ritlabs' websites for the
DH>> AVG Plugin for TB!
DE> try http://www.grisoft.com/html/us_avgbat.htm
That proved effective. I wonder why no link was displayed (or noted
Hello tbudlers,
I can't find a link on either Grisoft's or Ritlabs' websites for the
AVG Plugin for TB!
I could use the last AVG plugin for TB! downloaded (used with TB!
v161). Is there no longer a need for one? What's going on?
TIA
Douglas
--
__
Good morning Mary,
You asked Roelof:
JN As for your message files, if they are still on your hard drive, I
JN believe that there is a key combination which will force TB! to look
RO>> Try to search for lost folders
MB> I will do this. Thanks.
RO>> If your new account isn't installed
Hello Paul,
On Monday, October 28, 2002, 9:30:07 AM, you wrote:
PC> and a fourth- if you don't keep ANY anti-virus package up-to-date it is
PC> almost worthless. I have used many PCs where the virus definitions are
PC> over 1 year old. THEY think they are protected!
PC> and lets not for
Hello Simon, Allie, & others following this important thread.
It seems to me that Simon and Allie are basing their positions on
two different principles or givens, which are always correct by
definition. That's what produces a stalemate, in absolute terms. In
relative terms, each of us can decide
Yo Simon,
you wrote regarding:
DH>> Are attachments contained in the message body or in a separate
DH>> folder? If it's the latter, AVG will alert you and quarantine the
DH>> message but the infected file remains in the attach (or other)
DH>> folder...
S> I had always kept attachments in a sep
Hello Simon & others following this thread,
Simon wrote when Lourdes inquired:
LJ>> http://www.gfi.com/emailsecuritytest/ has a nice set of test emails
LJ>> I'm interested in knowing if the Anti-Virus plugins will catch the
LJ>> fragmented email (eicar.com attachment)
S> I was testing the A
Hello Tomas,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 1:12:14 PM, you wrote:
T> Bat! is great, yet if I could choose, it would probably be 50% Bat,
T> 40% Poco, 10% Eudora. In fact, it was because of that multiple accounts
T> "obstacle", that I evaluated and dropped Bat! 2 times in the past.
Have yo
Hello tracer,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 11:14:49 PM, you wrote:
T>>> having more dial-up accounts, each it`s own smtp server,
T>>> is there a way to setup one default smtp server for all
T>>> accounts, not only on per account basis?
t> I have an account with myrealbox.com and in the p
This issue is mostly OT was sent by Greg to TBUDL & the TBOT list.
I replied to the TBOT list but it hasn't come back, so pardon my
OT TBUDL post.
Hello Greg,
You asked about Win XP, multiple partitions and multiple OS's for
TB!:
I know of three sources for partitioning and multiple boot apps:
Some of us here use both TB! and the EccoPro PIM. Others on the Tom
Hoots Ecco list are looking for a way to Integrate EccoPro w/ an
email client. Naturally, I recommended TB!
As is, since TB! is my default MAPI agent, Ecco will call TB! for
generating email and fill in the address with the emai
Hello Alexis,
You wrote:
AH> As I know TB! works fine on WINE
That's good to know, because WINE is promoted by codeweavers as a
way to run M$Office 97 & 2K on Linux (and the "most popular Intel
Unixes") and you know what Office includes. IAC, there are other and
better Office Suites, which did
Hello Adam,
Your headers and signature indicate / suggest you are using TB! with
Linux. Is that correct? If so, what Linux and (I assume) win app
drivers or emulation are you using?
Thanks in advance.
Douglas Hinds
Current Ver: 1.61
Jan said:
JR> ... I think my problem is not so much one of data recovery but a
JR> utility that works with NTFS [not FAT32] which I could use to
JR> block the few bad sectors I have & fix the one file link which
JR> is what I think is affecting TB!. But to the best of my
JR> knowledge, I haven't
Hello again Jan,
As I suspected, www.ontrack.com is a little closer to your location
and http://www.ontrack.com/special/drquad1.asp is their Data
Recovery Center. I see that what they offer is XP compatible so it
shoukld work fine with NTFS,
Ontrack says it can recover your data or sell you Ont
Hello Jan,
About the problem you mentioned:
JR>>> Suddenly I can't delete msgs from any folder. If I click
JR>>> on the waste basket icon or , the result is the same,
JR>>> my system locks up for a few seconds.
Did you try rebooting the computer? Also, check your hard disk space
in that
Hello Marck,
you wrote:
MDP> If you get a spam that has this header:
MDP> X-Mailer: The Bat! (1.52f) Business
MDP> it, incongruously will also have an "X-MS-Priority" header. TB only
MDP> uses X-Priority.
Only six of the 21 spam messages lack X-MSMail-Priority and none of
them are hard core s
Hello Marck,
Marck wrote:
MDP> ... I've seen spam come through with "The Bat! (1.52f)
MDP> Business" as the X-Mailer and an X-MS-Priority header.
*Is* there a TB! "Business" version? I DO recall seeing that on the
spam I saw with TB! mentioned as the mailer in the header.
MDP> Advanced Mass S
Hello Carren,
On Sunday, July 21, 2002, 4:15:27 PM, you wrote:
CS> I have never received *any* spam from anyone using TB!
I have.
CS> and I can't imagine that anyone using it would use it for
CS> spamming purposes.
A better class of spammer, no doubt.
DH
_
umber of new ones, and the number downloaded. It
JBL> does not say how many were deleted by the Kill filter. On
JBL> Sunday, July 21, 2002, 7:21:29 PM, Douglas Hinds wrote:
In that case, you need to make your wish list known to the T
virus (please confirm).
DrWeb (Moscow) also has a TB plugin but is shareware and on finding
a virus will ask whether the user wants to shut down the computer or
lock the file, which allows one to continue downloading, after
taking note of the name and loca
Hello Jonathan,
JA> ... about a month after Klez started hitting hard, we got about
JA> 10 from the same reply-to address, I emailed, then ran through
JA> our customer database, and called that problem, and they
JA> acknowledged that they were infected, and that her PC had been
JA> taken away by
Hello Jonathan,
JA> ... about a month after Klez started hitting hard, we got about
JA> 10 from the same reply-to address, I emailed, then ran through
JA> our customer database, and called that problem, and they
JA> acknowledged that they were infected, and that her PC had been
JA> taken away by
Hello Thomas,
DH>> ... with an active
DH>> filter set the message DID show up on the mail dispatcher BUT - the
DH>> mail dispatcher had already configured the message to be deleted
DH>> without being downloaded, so all I had to do was hit F2.
TF> That's why it's called "selective download" and
Hello Thomas,
TF> I think to wait for a virus to come in from a particular
TF> Envelope-From, and to assume that your ISP has implemented a
TF> filter if it doesn't, is a vague test to say the least. ;-)
Not vague, just chancy. (It involves waiting for an iffy,
uncontrolled scenario). So I took
Jonathan asked in response to my stating:
>> ... I was getting several attachments daily containing virus from
>> the same source, although the "From" address, Subject &
>> attachment name would vary. What didn't vary was an address
>> contained in the headers which I Kill filtered on.
JA> Was
Jonathan asked in response to my stating:
>> ... I was getting several attachments daily containing virus from
>> the same source, although the "From" address, Subject &
>> attachment name would vary. What didn't vary was an address
>> contained in the headers which I Kill filtered on.
JA> Was
Jonathan Angliss reasoned in relation to my query:
>> When using "Selective Download" to kill selective messages on the
>> server:
>>
>> A).- Do the messages containing the selected string(s) appear in the
>> list of messages waiting to be downloaded when using the Mail
>> Dispatcher?
led on the server automatically and therefore
don't appear on the list of messages waiting to be downloaded?
Thanks in advance.
Douglas Hinds
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[
When using "Selective Download" to kill selective messages on the
server, do the messages containing the selected string(s) appear in
the list of messages waiting to be downloaded when using the Mail
Dispatcher?
Thanks in advance.
Dou
Hello tracer,
On Monday, June 10, 2002, 8:36:11 PM, you wrote:
t> So I found out the hard way that mail imported goes to the box which
t> happens to be selected
That is true. You have to import folder by folder. Otherwise,
combine your messages in one box and re-filter.
(I wrote the abov
I am running v. 1.60c. Please post the url for the latest upgrade,
as I don't see it in ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/ or
ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta/
Also, I assume that all I need to do to upgrade is change the main
.exe file. Is that correct?
Thanks in advance.
Douglas
DrWeb AntiVirus came out with a Bat! module (still in Beta).
http://www.dials.ru/english/inf/thebat.htm
Douglas
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbu
Hello David,
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 4:22:00 PM, you wrote:
DH>> I've tried to register The Bat! v.1.60c using my original The
DH>> Bat! v. 1.35 Registration Key and Key Checksum password but I'm
DH>> told that the Password doesn't coincide with the Key.
DH>> Will I have to fiddle with th
Hello Jan,
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 7:57:29 AM, you wrote:
Douglas>> [...] Due to a lack of disk space, I stopped
Douglas>> downloading email from some accounts. When I
Douglas>> finally did so, more than 8 thousand messages came
Douglas>> in at once. (A lot of spam was eliminated before
Do
is there a way to Re-register
TB! via the normal registration Procedure?
Douglas Hinds
--
Current Ver: 1.60k
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Modera
Hello Marcus,
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 12:20:53 PM, you replied to my saying to
Mike M's statement:
M>>> Another thing I like about Calypso (though more minor) is that the
M>>> message store is encrypted (albeit, not too strongly). I haven't
M>>> taken the time yet to see if TB! has a simila
xt few weeks (except for this mailing
M> list account, which has to stay in Calypso due to the single file
M> thing).
You won't be sorry for having switched.
M> I do like what I've seen in TB! during my eval period. And I hope
M> to discover more "good stuff" as
1 - 100 of 459 matches
Mail list logo
