Hello Ira,
Tuesday, April 19, 2022, 9:14:18 AM, you wrote:
>> Using %CURSOR now, no difference. Why?
> I noticed in my instance that 2 different accounts replies worked different,
> one had $Cursor and was broken, and the other had $CURSOR and worked.
> Changing the mixed case one to upper case
Hi
On Tuesday 14 April 2020 at 10:37:58 AM, in
,
ml-respo...@treadstone79.de wrote:-
> Hi,
> is there a way to manually move a message to the spam
> folder using a
> quick button?
You could do something with Deletion and Alternative Deletion settings
in Account Properties.
Hi,
is there a way to manually move a message to the spam folder using a
quick button?
I can only think of either manually dragging the message from inbox to
spam folder or using the "move to folder" button, but the former is
difficult if you have a larger folder list and the latte
11/28/2016 1:56 PM
Hi Arkadiusz,
On 11/28/2016 Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote:
AG> Hello Jack,
AG> On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 5:35:21 PM, you wrote in subject of "Best
spam filter for TB!":
JSL>> Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what
this
Hello Jack,
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 5:35:21 PM, you wrote in subject of "Best spam
filter for TB!":
JSL> Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what this
group
JSL> thinks is a good spam filter for TB! today. We are both running v6.xx and
JSL
Hello TBUDL'ers,
My wife is getting annoyed at the amount of spam (advertisements) she is getting
and wants me to do something about it. Years ago I was using K9 which seemed to
work just fine but then I discovered it also seemed to be preventing large
emails from getting through, so
Hello Paul,
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 you wrote:
PB> You might try http://www.snapfiles.com/get/revouninstaller.html
Thanks Paul. Been using REVO Uninstaller for years.
--
Regards,
Jack
Using TB! ver 6.0.12 with Windows 7
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus s
ade, tears were shed. I'll go back and take another look
Feli but
JSL> for those 30 days I don't think I even saw any spam. I'm assuming if
A.S.S. had trapped
JSL> any spam I would have been given the option to handle it so maybe I just
didn't
JSL> get any spam dur
r this excellent work.
Well, before I started getting nag messages telling me my 30 day trial was up, I
thought I *was* using the free version.
Mistakes were made, tears were shed. I'll go back and take another look Feli but
for those 30 days I don't think I even saw any spam. I'm assum
Hello Jack,
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:54:56 -0500GMT Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
JSL> Ok, now that I've tried A.S.S. and don't wish to purchase it at this time
(maybe
JSL> later), anybody know how to remove it so I don't have to keep seeing those
nag
JSL> boxes every time I start TB!?
If you are happy
x27;t have to keep seeing those
>> nag
>> boxes every time I start TB!?
S> Options/Preferences/Plug Ins/Anti-Spam and Delete. (blushing_shy)
Thank you Stuart. Worked perfectly.
--
Regards,
Jack
Using TB! ver 6.0.12 with Windows 7
---
This email has been checked for viru
s/Preferences/Plug Ins/Anti-Spam and Delete. (blushing_shy)
--
Best regards,
Stuartmailto:skcu...@fastmail.fm
Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello TBUDL'ers,
Ok, now that I've tried A.S.S. and don't wish to purchase it at this time (maybe
later), anybody know how to remove it so I don't have to keep seeing those nag
boxes every time I start TB!?
--
TIA,
Jack LaRosa
:usflag: :alabamaflag: Central Alabama
Using TB! 6.0.12
OS: Safely
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013, 10:12:21 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com)
wrote:
> Antispam SNIPER? If that is the case open it up from the toolbar, go
> to options and clear the database and let it start learning again
So I did that. Two new e-mail messages from the same list about which
LSB> The other day I wrote that Anti-spam Spider seemed to be stricter. It
LSB> has gotten worse. Several e-mail nottes from another list were junked,
LSB> even though I had put the sender into my address book.
LSB> Any ideas?
LSB> Thanks.
Antispam SNIPER? If that is the case
The other day I wrote that Anti-spam Spider seemed to be stricter. It
has gotten worse. Several e-mail nottes from another list were junked,
even though I had put the sender into my address book.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Using The Bat! v5.2.2 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601
Has Anti-spam spider become stricter. I am finding an increase of the
number of e-mail notes that end up in the junk folder, many from
regular correspondents of mine. This morning, I found seven (7) e-mail
messages from this list in the junk folder.
Thanks.
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Using The
hey send me daily spam reports. A Basian
filtering system allows for training, if there should be any
false-positives or false-negatives (hardly ever happens).
Company email: The email provider we contract this out to uses some
kind of spam filter, but we get a lot of false-negatives and a few
fals
Hi
On Sunday 29 September 2013 at 2:25:37 PM, in
, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> It's been done server-side over here.
Just out of interest, do you run your own server or is your incoming
email censored by your service provider?
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:expires2...@yma
Hello David,
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:47:52 +0100 GMT (27-Sep-13, 21:47 +0700 GMT),
David Elliott wrote:
> What do you all use to catch SPAM?
It's been done server-side over here.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/
Message reply created with The
9/27/2013 10:56 AM
Hi jb,
On 9/27/2013 jb_lists...@trink.co.uk wrote:
jtcu> Hello David Elliott,
jtcu> On Friday, September 27, 2013, 3:47:52 PM, David Elliott wrote:
>> What do you all use to catch SPAM?
jtcu> AntiSpamSniper - http://www.antispamsniper.com
jtcu> I have
Hello David Elliott,
On Friday, September 27, 2013, 3:47:52 PM, David Elliott wrote:
> What do you all use to catch SPAM?
AntiSpamSniper - http://www.antispamsniper.com
I have been using it for years.
--
Julian
Using The Bat! v5.4.8 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7
Hello Tbudl,
What do you all use to catch SPAM?
--
Best regards,
David mailto:da...@elliott.uk.com
Current version is 5.2.2 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Jeff,
If the TB4 plug-ins are compatible with TB5, you might want
to take a look at the Regula Anti-spam plug-in. I've been
using it ever since my mail server went to STARTLS (which
broke POPfile) about six months ago. After a bit of training
Regula seems to be doing a good job of catchin
JG> What do people use/recommend in its place? It's useful to be able to
JG> identify SPAM and have it moved to a junk folder.
Years ago a similar question was asked and the suggestion at
that time was K9 from KEIR.NET which I have used ever since
with great success. It's a Bayes
Hello Group
I've been away from Windows for a while but I'm now back home with XP
x64 and TheBat v 5.0.34.
I see we no longer have the BayesIT (? spelling) plug in for a variety
of reasons.
What do people use/recommend in its place? It's useful to be able to
identify SPAM an
On Thursday, August 25, 2011, 4:55:33 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> I don't know whether AntiSpamSniper is the best but it is working here
> quite sufficiently. You can get it from
> http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html
Thanks.
Leonard
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Using The
On Thursday, August 25, 2011, 4:56:57 PM, you (tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com) wrote:
> I use it too
> http://antispamsniper.com/index.html
Thanks.
Leonard
--
Leonard S. Berkowitz
Using The Bat! v5.0.20.1 on Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
Hello Leonard,
Thursday, August 25, 2011, 10:31:16 PM, you wrote:
> I'd like to know whether AntiSpam Spider is still the
> latest and greatest anti-spam utility for theBat on a Windows 7/64 bit
> machine, and, if so, how do I get it. If something else has superseded
> it, what?
> A few years back, I installed an anti-spam add-on, AntiSpam Sniper
> from Good Vein Software. I have installed theBat on a new computer and
> restored the backup there. The anti-spam utility does not appear in my
> anti-spam preferences, so I guess I need to reinstall it or install
A few years back, I installed an anti-spam add-on, AntiSpam Sniper
from Good Vein Software. I have installed theBat on a new computer and
restored the backup there. The anti-spam utility does not appear in my
anti-spam preferences, so I guess I need to reinstall it or install
something else. I&#
Hello All
Just wondering if there is a "Report SPAM" plugin that works with
Gmail? I've notice a SPAM starting to come through and would like a
way to report it in The Bat!
Cheers
--
Scott Sims
Email: sc...@aceblue.com
Sunday, May 23, 2010, 12:45:34 AM, you wrote:
> And, presumably, no way to rescue messages falsely categorised as
> spam.
Actually, there is. All marked messages are collected in the Junk folder, which
you can review either on the web interface or via IMAP.
Zoltan
smime.p7s
Descript
Hello tb...@thebat.,
Saturday, May 22, 2010, 1:14:42 PM, you wrote:
TH> Hello TBUL,
TH> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
TH> favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
TH> find anything that has worked that well with T
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:45:34 +0100 GMT (23/May/10, 5:45 AM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
>> Server-side is better anyway: No need to download all the spam
>> messages.
M> And, presumably, no way to rescue messages falsely categorised as
M> spam.
You presume wrong. I g
Hello Ian,
Saturday, May 22, 2010, 4:17:51 PM, you wrote:
> G'day MFPA,
> On Sunday, May 23, 2010, at 8:45:34 AM, you (MFPA) wrote:
>>> Server-side is better anyway: No need to download all
>>> the spam messages.
M>> And, presumably, no way to rescue
Hi
On Saturday 22 May 2010 at 5:16:23 PM, in
, Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
> Server-side is better anyway: No need to download all
> the spam messages.
And, presumably, no way to rescue messages falsely categorised as
spam.
--
Best regards
MFPAmailto:ex
>> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
>> favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
>> find anything that has worked that well with TB to control Spam.
>> Thanks in advance for your input!!!
SpamAssassin does
> Hello TBUL,
> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
> favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
> find anything that has worked that well with TB to control Spam.
> Thanks in advance for your input!!!
I use "Spa
Hello Hajdú,
On Sat, 22 May 2010 14:17:32 +0200 GMT (22/May/10, 19:17 PM +0700 GMT),
Hajdú Zoltán wrote:
>> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam?
HZ> I use Fastmail.fm and they do very good spam filtering on the
HZ> server.
Same here, except I don't use fastmail.f
Hello Tim,
Friday, May 21, 2010, 8:14:42 PM, you wrote:
Tim> Hello TBUL,
Tim> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
Tim> favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
Tim> find anything that has worked that well with TB to
Fellow list members,
Am I the only one still using K9?
--
TIA,
Jack LaRosa mailto:jlar...@charter.net
Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 4.0.38 for now.
Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3
Cu
Saturday, May 22, 2010, 5:14:42 AM, you wrote:
> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
> favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
> find anything that has worked that well with TB to control Spam.
> Thanks in advance for
Hi
On Saturday 22 May 2010 at 4:14:42 AM, in
, Tim Hamm wrote:
> Hello TBUL,
> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do
> you have a favorite spam filter that you use with TB.
> I haven't been able to find anything that has worked
> that well with TB to
Tim,
On 22-05-2010 05:14, you wrote in :
> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam?
Spam Assassin on the mail server. :-)
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
4.0.39.33 (BETA) Pro MyGate, AVG
12 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 1 POP3 MyGate, 300K+ msgs.
Window
On Fri, 21 May 2010 at 20:14:42 -0700,Tim wrote:
> Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
> favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
> find anything that has worked that well with TB to control Spam.
> Thanks in advance for
Hello TBUL,
Just curious but how do you all deal with Spam? Do you have a
favorite spam filter that you use with TB. I haven't been able to
find anything that has worked that well with TB to control Spam.
Thanks in advance for your input!!!
--
Best regards,
Hi
On Monday 27 July 2009 at 9:59:48 AM, in
, Simon wrote:
> I have absolutely no argument there. I completely agree
> that 'a workman is worthy of his hire', to steal from
> an old religious book. People are criminally
> undervalued, vastly overworked, and grossly underpaid,
> that's how capit
Hello Simon,
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:33:18 +0100 GMT (28/Jul/09, 6:33 AM +0700 GMT),
Simon wrote:
>> Hello <...snip long stuff...> free?
S> Just so there is no unnecessary hostility poking through here, whatever
S> position you are defending I am not on the other side of it threatening it
S> in
Roger Phillips:
> Monday, July 27, 2009, 7:05:25 PM, among other things, you wrote:
>
> L> Unfortunately, my version of the Sniper (3.2.1.1 free) hangs when I try to
> L> access the white list configuration.
...
> Did you start with 3.2.1.1 or did you upgrade from an earlier version?
I upgraded,
'Ello Thomas,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:44:29 +0700 (your time) you said:
> Hello <...snip long stuff...> free?
Just so there is no unnecessary hostility poking through here, whatever
position you are defending I am not on the other side of it threatening it
in any way, so you may want to relax on
Hello Luca,
Monday, July 27, 2009, 7:05:25 PM, among other things, you wrote:
L> Unfortunately, my version of the Sniper (3.2.1.1 free) hangs when I try to
L> access the white list configuration.
I still run version 3.2.0.6 as I see that a number of its features are now
only available in the P
Roger Phillips:
> Monday, July 27, 2009, 1:57:44 PM, among other things, you wrote:
>
> L> I get a large number of false
> L> positives, and I can't stop it from putting some particular messages in my
> L> junk folder (e.g., the monthly tbul subscription reminder). It simply won't
> L> understand
Hello Simon,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:40:42 +0100 GMT (27/Jul/09, 15:40 PM +0700 GMT),
Simon wrote:
S>>> "Let people..." is a curious turn of phrase. Interesting, capitalism
S>>> masquerading as an ideology.
>> It is the same philosophy with which people say that everything on the
>> internet shou
Hello Roger,
Monday, July 27, 2009, 16:55:02, you wrote:
>I have never had trouble with ASS throwing out TB messages.
Neither have I ;)
--
Regards,
Chrillemailto:numbe...@thebat.net
Using The Bat! 4.2.9.1
AntispamSniper Pro v 3.2.1.1
Windows XP 5.1 Build 260
Hello Luca,
Monday, July 27, 2009, 1:57:44 PM, among other things, you wrote:
L> I get a large number of false
L> positives, and I can't stop it from putting some particular messages in my
L> junk folder (e.g., the monthly tbul subscription reminder). It simply won't
L> understand.
Have you added
Robin Anson:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 at 15:22:48 +0100, Privateofcourse wrote:> Hello TBUDL,
> > I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of
> > so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do
> > a
Code 2:
> > AntispamSniper
> Agreed. After about 30,000 e-mail messages including 1,400 spam
> messages, my stats are showing 98.97% accuracy and only 0.08% false
> positives.
I use Antispamsniper, the free version. I guess there is no way to make it
work after the normal TB fi
'Ello MFPA,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:21:57 +0100 (your time) you said:
> The problem is the greedy capitalist [insert desired expletive] who
> pays people just enough to stop them from leaving instead of paying the
> value of their contribution.
I have absolutely no argument there. I complete
'Ello Thomas,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:41:05 +0700 (your time) you said:
S>> "Let people..." is a curious turn of phrase. Interesting, capitalism
S>> masquerading as an ideology.
> It is the same philosophy with which people say that everything on the
> internet should be free.
I don't see how th
Hi
On Sunday 26 July 2009 at 11:45:14 PM, in
, Simon wrote:
> I'll remember to tell the altruist that gives up their
> free time and money that they should desist with their
> beneficent activities because they should be paid for
> their troubles, because they are the rules, and
> fairness deman
Hello Simon,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:45:14 +0100 GMT (27/Jul/09, 5:45 AM +0700 GMT),
Simon wrote:
P>>> I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.
>> Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old tradition.
>> I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway.
S> "Let p
'Ello Thomas,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:49:21 +0700 (your time) you said:
P>> I think the emphasis though must be on free solutions.
> Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old tradition.
> I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway.
"Let people..." is a curious turn of p
> Yes, I agree. Let people work for free, this is a centuries-old
> tradition. I have no idea why I pay for services, anyway.
I pay for a spamcop.net account because reporting spammers may not
stop them, but it helps dry up their sending sources. I may be
shoveling against the tide but I feel that
Hello Privateofcourse,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:22:48 +0100 GMT (15/Jun/09, 21:22 +0700 GMT),
Privateofcourse wrote:
P> I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority
P> of so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't
P> reall
Hallo Carren,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:18:07 +1200GMT (26-7-2009, 9:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS> I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty
CS> well, but is there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my
other filters have run?
No there i
Hello Carren,
Sunday, July 26, 2009, 9:18:07 AM, among other things, you wrote:
CS> I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty well, but
CS> is there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my other
CS> filters have run?
I don't think so.
Hi
I'm using the built in BayesIT spam filter which works pretty well, but is
there some way of setting it to filter incoming mail AFTER my other filters
have run? In spite of me attempting to train it to recognise TBDUL mail as "not
junk" - much of my list mail is still ending
Sunday, July 19, 2009, 4:14:48 AM, you wrote:
> I am intrigued by the statement on
> the AntiSpam Sniper site that the plug-in can delete SPAM right on the
> server. That would save me a lot of needless download time.
I tried Antispam-Sniper recently but went back to Mailwasher (not a
Thanks for hyperlink and the recommendation. I'll look into AntiSpam
Sniper. I currently use PopFile 1.1.0 to eliminate or reduce SPAM. I
got forced into using some measure when the anti-spam filter used by
my ISP suddenly stopped working and I became inundated with SPAM.
PopFile works O
> Hello Jouni,
> Thursday, July 16, 2009, 01:18:14, you wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I would like to receive some recommendations, based on personal
>> experience, as to which Anti-Spam Plugin solution would be worthwhile.
>> I wouldn't mind paying somethi
Hello Jouni,
Thursday, July 16, 2009, 01:18:14, you wrote:
> Hi all,
> I would like to receive some recommendations, based on personal
> experience, as to which Anti-Spam Plugin solution would be worthwhile.
> I wouldn't mind paying something for a working solutio
Hello Jouni,
It was foretold that on 15/07/2009 @ 02:18:14 GMT+0300 (which was
20:18:14 where I live) Jouni Kukkonen would write:
> I've been using TB for some time now, in a very simple way, and would
> now like to add Anti-Spam capability to it, as not everyone of
Hi all,
I've been using TB for some time now, in a very simple way, and would
now like to add Anti-Spam capability to it, as not everyone of my
e-mail service providers does a good job filtering spam.
I would like to receive some recommendations, based on personal
experience,
s
> creating forwarders for every new contact, but then you
> can identify immediately where SPAM has come from...and
> inform whoever it is that has leaked the email address
> that they've got a problem. I also then delete the
> forwarder for them and give them a new, '
Hello Privateofcourse,
Monday, June 15, 2009, 4:22:48 PM, you wrote:
> I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of
> so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do
> anything other than allow you to manage
Hello tb...@thebat.,
Friday, June 19, 2009, 7:43:13 PM, you wrote:
P> Hello Paul,
...
P> My personal email does get occasional SPAM, and I keep having to update the
P> filters in cPanel. But I've just been reading about the free Comodo AntiSpam
P> software, which is a f
Hello Paul,
This is what you said on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:47:13 +1000 your time:
> I get nearly all spam, do not use an external filter yet.
> My ISP offers free spam filtering, so I use this. It stops the
> download of 60% to 70%.
> I use internal mail filters along these line
in your craw' that by buying a solution *you* have
ended up picking up the tab for dealing with SPAM? It rather seems to me
that we have a situation where the SPAMer is on the make, the solution
provider is on the make, and everyone else forms the big pocket that both
parties want to dip into. This m
Hello Raymond and Jens,
This is what you both said on Mon, 15 Jun 2009:
> AntispamSniper [...]
Thanks, I'll take a look myself first, and then assess whether saying
nothing would be better (for me) than suggesting it ;-)
--
Simon (Privateofcourse)
#23818. God Hews No Weir? ¶
TB! 4.2.4 W
Hello tb...@thebat.,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 12:22:48 AM, you wrote:
P> Hello TBUDL,
P> What do TB! users consider to be the
P> 1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
P> 2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?
...
I get nearly all
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 at 15:22:48 +0100, Privateofcourse wrote:> Hello TBUDL,
> I've done a bit of leg work, but it seems to me that the majority of
> so-called 'SPAM blocker/stopper' solutions don't and can't really do
> anything other than allow you to mana
>> What do TB! users consider to be the
>> 1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
> > 2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?
> AntispamSniper
Agreed. After about 30,000 e-mail messages including 1,400 spam
messages, my st
Hello Privateofcourse,
Monday, June 15, 2009, 16:22:48, you wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
> What do TB! users consider to be the
> 1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
> 2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?
> I think the emphasis th
Hello Privateofcourse,
Monday, June 15, 2009, 9:22:48 AM, you wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
> What do TB! users consider to be the
> 1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
> 2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?
> First, this isn't
Hello TBUDL,
What do TB! users consider to be the
1) the best external SPAM management solution for TB! users?
2) the best internal SPAM management solution for TB! users?
First, this isn't for me, as I manage SPAM via convoluted email practises
and via cPanel, and so for a lot of
Hi
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 at 11:50:34 PM, in
, Stuart Cuddy wrote:
> you can de-select the show this window automatically check box. This
> will cause TB to ignore HTML pictures and act like TB used to.
Brilliant. I saw this window rarely enough that it was only a minor
irritation. Now you
Hi
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 at 10:04:47 PM, in
, Dwight Corrin wrote:
> you can always just allow everything
How? (Just curious.)
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Yellow snow is not lemon flavoured
Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
__
Hi
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 at 4:28:04 AM, in
, Jens Franik wrote:
> Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 at 01:05, Lynn wrote:
>> I'm not seeing an earth icon. Perhaps I have an
>> alternate skin or toolbox option?
> More likely, that you have to view a HTML Mail to make
> it appear.
It only appea
Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 at 01:05, Lynn wrote:
> I'm not seeing an earth icon.
> Perhaps I have an alternate skin or toolbox option?
More likely, that you have to view a HTML Mail to make it appear.
The other way is to customize the Toolbar and set up the Icon
yourself.
It is in All_A
Hello Lynn,
Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 6:05:21 PM, you wrote:
L> I discovered this accidentally a few minutes after I answered the last
L> mail. At least I found the checkbox; I'm not seeing an earth icon.
L> Perhaps I have an alternate skin or toolbox option?
It only appears when you are viewing
1/27/2009
SC> If you are referring to the URL manager then you can disable it entirely or
call
SC> it up as needed.
I was, yes.
SC> To open it click on the earth icon on the header bar and select
Show URL
SC> Manager. There you can de-select the show this window automatically check
Hello Lynn,
Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:03:21 PM, you wrote:
L> If the thing can't be disabled altogether, is it at least possible to
L> tell it to block or permit domain names? This business of
L> allowing/blocking each individual gif or jpg is totally insane! They
L> change with every mailing o
1/27/2009
DC> you can always just allow everything
I am thinking that will have to be it, and I'm sure I won't have to wait
long before I see it again. I haven't even been able to find a
way to bring the wretched thing up independently! I didn't think I was
any stupider than usual, but I've real
On Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 3:56:27 PM, Lynn wrote:
> Many have several roots, as many as 5 on the worst. And it is evident
> that they change the content from mailing to mailing, so that one
> determination is not enough. EBay notices frequently have several; since
> various items/vendors are i
1/27/2009
RO> You're talking about the Download URL manager, that isn't a spam
RO> filter, but gives you the possibility to configure from what sites you
RO> want to see the pictures and from what sites not.
RO> Don't select the individual messages, but the
jpg is totally insane! They
L> change with every mailing on much of this stuff, and filtering on those
L> defeats the purpose entirely!
You're talking about the Download URL manager, that isn't a spam
filter, but gives you the possibility to configure from what sites you
want to
Hi -
Since I upgraded the last time, this spam device has driven me bonkers.
I have just scanned over 800 messages here, and haven't found a fix, and
can only hope I haven't missed it. Thanks be that Batters are so good
about subject lines!
If the thing can't be disabled altog
Hi
On Tuesday 1 July 2008 at 11:02:28 AM, in
, Tom wrote:
> For the second time I have now received a strange spam message into my
> Tbudl account - this time with an attachment of about 5.88 mb called
> Fractalsetp.
I have not received these.
I do not use any anti-spam software an
Hallo Tom,
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:02:28 +1000GMT (1-7-2008, 12:02 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
T> For the second time I have now received a strange spam message into my
T> Tbudl account - this time with an attachment of about 5.88 mb called
T> Fractalsetp.
Got something like that,
1 - 100 of 1638 matches
Mail list logo
