Boris Zentner wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag 19 Oktober 2004 00:15 schrieb Stas Bekman:
Ops, sorry.
hard to explain in english, here is a example:
perl -we 'sub have_lwp {} my $redir = have_lwp ? [qw(GET HEAD POST)] :
1;'
% perl -we 'sub have_lwp {}; my $redir = have_lwp ? [qw(GET HEAD POST)] :
1;' Search
it?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
://perl.apache.org/contribute/index.html
Thanks Boris.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http
David Wheeler wrote:
On Oct 19, 2004, at 5:22 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Is it because you can't really do redirects on real POST requests? The
body will get lost, isn't it?
No, we do them all the time in Bricolage.
In which case, can you please review Boris' patch and commit it if you
think it's
;
Apache::TestRequest::user_agent(reset = 1,
requests_redirectable = $redir);
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http
to
A-T after 1.14 release (since Apache-Test will care a higher version in
the mp2 package on release). Actually it's not true, while _ is in the
modperl version PAUSE won't index it, so I guess it's fine for now.
--
__
Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
unless mod_perl 1.99_17 is imminent I'd like to roll Apache-Test 1.14
- now
that Devel::Cover works with mod_perl, 1.14 will be the first Apache-Test
release that has the ability to take advantage of Devel::Cover without
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
it.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
+ save no-httpd one-process);
may be it's better to use _ instead of - in the option names, so one
doesn't need to quote them in the code. -no_httpd, -one_process. It's
especially nice for -one_process, since it's the same
)
: '';
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http
:)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http
.
+1
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http
:
Files=218, Tests=2512, 1032 wallclock secs (594.94 cusr + 431.33 csys =
1026.27 CPU)
+ After:
Files=218, Tests=2512, 246 wallclock secs (196.69 cusr + 33.55 csys =
230.24 CPU)
gozer++, +1
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH
breakages).
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 01:56:05PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So all the problems you have reported before are now resolved, William?
I knew you were going to ask me that g! It's not necessarily the case.
I did not do a complete test under Windows using my test suite; I just
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:17:37PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
You can download the release candidate from here:
http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.13-dev.tar.gz
If there are no problems reported Apache-Test 1.13 will be
released tomorrow.
It's working fine for me under
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:08:33AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
It's working fine for me under both Linux and Windows.
Thanks!
So all the problems you have reported before are now resolved, William?
I knew you were going to ask me that g! It's not necessarily the case.
I did
];
}
:)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:56:12AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Aha! Excellent, Geoff! Does it solve the problem by moving those
default_module calls after getting httpd config?
Moving the calls one line further on fixed it for me. OK to check in?
(BTW your patch had whitespace
for the
general case.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:17:04AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd rather see it moved two statements (it still works, doesn't it?) so
the eapi comes right after inherit_config. Otherwise, yes, please commit it.
Yes, great, done.
so are we all clean now? Any other problems
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
But things are getting more and more fragile and dependant on each
other
indeed. right now a fresh checkout will not even run for me because I
don't
have an ssl-enabled apache to run against. this is not a minor issue,
as I
suspect I'm in the majority
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
-trace=debug :)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
to know whether my recent changes in Apache-Test didn't break
things, when so many tests fail (they were failing before my changes).
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org
, but the configuration tests)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
mp2 had its t_cmp args adjusted, but not httpd-test. So we get this
confusing:
# expected: 500 Not a SCALAR reference
# received: 102400
any takers on swapping the args of t_cmp to comply with recent A-T changes?
--
__
Stas Bekman
all that
code from Apache-Test and move it into perl-framework/t/lib?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
warnings FATAL = qw(all);
+
+use Apache::Test;
+use Apache::TestUtil;
+
+sub handler {
+
+ plan shift, tests = 1;
+
+ ok t_cmp(1, 1, 'called Apache::Test::ok()');
+
+ 0;
ditto
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another
;
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
mean?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http
;
+}
+}
+
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http
as well :)
Thanks Geoff!
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
is recurrent) and have
a better way to handle requirements check+skip and only requirements
check. Ideas?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http
, or desire_foo, etc...
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 31, 2004, at 1:14 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
so, have_foo is intuitive to be used anywhere in the code, and plan
now will look like:
plan tests = 5, need_lwp, need_cgi, need_php;
I like this, but isn't it putting the onus of change on module owners
and introducing
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Stas Bekman wrote:
David?
Boris Zentner wrote:
We are all at the OSCon at the moment, so we hardly get a chance to
sleep. I suppose David will follow up soonish :)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl
?');
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
William McKee wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 11:19:02AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not sure, but you could run both with tracing on -trace=debug or
APACHE_TEST_TRACE_LEVEL=debug and then compare the logs. Could be that in
one case it finds a global httpd.conf but not in the other?
Hi Stas
from Lhttp://puffin.sourceforge.net/
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http
implementations were done.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
* it won't generate the bullets. I wanted the bullets so * is there.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
would want to install the module
you're testing. but maybe I'll come up with something anyway :)
:)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Stas Bekman wrote:
so we reverted the args to t_cmp() to comply with other Test modules
conventions, but why reverting the debug printout? I find it confusing:
# received: undef
# expected: foobar
Do the other test modules also print it reversed?
OK, as agreed over irc I've reversed those only
::MB-new(
module_name = 'Apache::Test::Skeleton',
)-create_build_script;
Regards,
David
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto
feeling about that.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
,
},
There is no Apache.pm in mp2. You probably wanted to say:
requires = { 'mod_perl' = 0,
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
There is no Apache.pm in mp2. You probably wanted to say:
requires = { 'mod_perl' = 0,
Right. In fact, it should probably be
requires = { 'mod_perl' = '1.0',
in the MP1 example, and
requires
oops, thanks for the subject :)
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I think we should try to be consistent with all TestM* frontends, no?
Yes.
I think we kept this message, in the same fashion to MakeMaker writing
what does it do. and it's good to tell the user
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 1:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
There is no Apache.pm in mp2. You probably wanted to say:
requires = { 'mod_perl' = 0,
Right. In fact, it should probably be
requires = { 'mod_perl' = '1.0
.
That would probably be Andreas and Autrijus.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ ... ]
What about requiring 'Apache' for mp1-related modules
(since 'Apache' doesn't exist within mp2), and for mp2
modules, requiring 'Apache2' (which doesn't exist within
mp1)?
It won't work since the version number
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 9, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I don't know how M::B does the version checking, but EU::MM does file
parsing, searching for the $VERSION line, so the version number must
be hardcoded there, unless you do something like:
$VERSION = do { require Apache2
Apache::Test::Skeleton::mod_perl(1|2) packages with versioning in those
tars and upload to CPAN?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
generate_script {
my $self = shift;
# If a file name has been passed in, use it. Otherwise, use the
Committed, should there be a log in Changes?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org
Thanks Andrew. But it's not a problem for us, since we don't run Apache-Test
under threads.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
file |
+-+
*** Error code 1
Stop in /home/alian/.cpanplus/5.8.4/build/Apache-Test-1.12 (line 831 of
Makefile).
error_log is missing.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just
not sure about the name choice. $(TEST_VERBOSE) and $(TEST_FILES) are the
same as other Test packages use. Do they have $TEST_EXTRA_ARGS too? Otherwise
we may better use some name specific to Apache-Test?
--
__
Stas Bekman
), and
TESTDB_SW.
so how about APACHE_TEST_EXTRA_ARGS? it's verbose but it shouldn't be too
bad and it beats making tons of extra targets.
+1
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org
...But I leave it up to you guys.
Added. We used to not do that manually, since modperl-2.0 automatically
generates MANIFEST. Not the case with A-T.
Geoff, just go ahead and release it with the new MANIFEST.
--
__
Stas Bekman
with 'cvs diff'
so that they can be applied easily, thanks :)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
in their projects.
ay, didn't realize the candidate is still out there and wasn't released. Sorry
about that. Though these changes should be harmless :)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches with
'cvs diff' so that they can be applied easily, thanks :)
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Ah, right, too many flags
.
Apparently it is still an issue.
Yup, but it was an issue with previous A-T releases as well, so it's not a
showstopper. Someone who can reproduce this problem ought to find a fix.
Commenting out code is not quite a fix.
--
__
Stas
]
t/TEST -run [tests]
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
.
Let's deal with that when the need arises.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http
Ken Williams wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 5:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
I figured. I like my style, too (mainly just cperl-mode style). ;-)
pretty much the same here, cperl-mode too :)
For HTML::Mason we found it helpful to add the following as the first
line of source files
www.apache.org/dev/
doesn't reveal much...
It's a well kept secret :) existing committers need to vote first, I'll keep
you posted as I get more information.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
know how to test it. Thanks David.
Cool, thanks. What do you need to be able to feel comfortable/ready to
release it?
As I mentioned I don't know how to test
-{opts}-{'no-httpd'};
$self-run_tests;
-$self-stop;
+$self-stop unless $self-{opts}-{'no-httpd'};
}
may be use -nohttpd, so that you don't need to quote the key string?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Absolutely. It's really just:
MyTest-new-run(@ARGV);
where MyTest is a subclass of Apache::TestRunPerl
I tried that, but it didn't work. I'm not sure why. The first problem
was this code:
$0 = File::Spec-rel2abs($0
you
could use the notice() func. Apache::TestTrace really mimicks the LogLevel
from Apache.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 2:44 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
It may be a fairly complex logic to add, though you could write
wrappers that simply push things into @ARGV, emulating the command line.
Though I'd rather have one way to do things. It's already a
non-trivial thing with all
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 13, 2004, at 2:13 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I suppose so. Check that A-t generates ServerRoot setting
pointing to the local dir.
It does. I don't know what else might be the problem...what command does
A-T use to start Apache? Could it be different somehow than what A-t
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 11, 2004, at 8:24 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm working on a module in another project that's still using the old
Apache::test (not the lc test).
Any reason why you wouldn't move to A-T?
Like I said, it's not my module, so it's not my call.
Neither I familiar with A-t
of time and not release numbers. So may be it's
better to say, let's give people some 3 months to move over and set a certain
date as a cutoff rather than a version number? Just an idea...
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
But it's quite possible that argument could be readonly while not a
string, a simple example is a return value of a function:
% perl -le 'a(b(), b); sub a {($_[0], $_[1]) = ($_[1], $_[0]);}; \
sub b { 5 }'
Modification
september and left it at that. committed, but feel
free to tweak it more if you like.
no, it's fine
thanks for the input :)
;)
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide
about the opposite case. You probably wanted something like:
$why .= $@ unless $@ =~ /^Can't locate/;
no?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http
with tracing on -trace=debug or
APACHE_TEST_TRACE_LEVEL=debug and then compare the logs. Could be that in one
case it finds a global httpd.conf but not in the other?
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoff, why did you make APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES prevent from
saving autoconfig?
however it's done, I want an option wereby absolutely nothing sticky is ever
generated or used. the don't touch my system option was my goal, which
really isn't
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:58:36AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, it was due to my recent change to remove the use of
revision 2 as a default.
I was able to reproduce it. Now fixed in cvs. Please confirm that it works
for you.
Hi Stas,
Actually I just pulled
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:00:36PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Make sure you don't have APACHE_TEST_NO_STICKY_PREFERENCES env var turned
on. That's exactly the problem I've raised in the other thread.
Yeah, I read some of that thread though didn't follow the exact details
can release a new A-T later, when William follow ups and we
figure out what the problem is, if at all.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Please show us the verbose trace:
t/TEST -trace=debug
including the part where you completed the interactive questions, and it
brought you back to interactive config again.
Got the latest version from CVS again
to
have a better granularity.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks William, what do you have inside:
/home/william/.apache-test/Apache/TestConfigData.pm
[...]
$Apache::TestConfigData::vars = {
'httpd' = '/usr/local/apache/bin/httpd',
So does this file exist and executable
William McKee wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:43:49PM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
So does this file exist and executable? /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd? any
symlinks involved? I fail to reproduce it on my machine.
Yes, it exists and is executable. I wonder if there is a permissions
problem
.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
/mod_perl/coverage/report.html
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http
101 - 200 of 647 matches
Mail list logo
