garym wrote:
> Unlikely to find much help on the z553 here on this forum. Might have
> better luck at the logitech forum:
> https://support.logi.com/hc/en-us/community/topics thanks for the link. Bernd
wartburgritter's Pr
wartburgritter wrote:
> thanks for the fast help.The problem os not related to the squeezebox
> touch at all.
>
> Years ago I bought a set of a squeeze box touch and the speaker system
> logitech z553. All the years I have been thinking the speaker belong to
> the squeezebox. Just realized I j
thanks for the fast help.The problem os not related to the squeezebox
touch at all.
Years ago I bought a set of a squeeze box touch and the speaker system
logitech z553. All the years I have been thinking the speaker belong to
the squeezebox. Just realized I just boight them together.
OK offto
You can adjust balance using the Inguz EQ/DRC plugin, but your issue
sounds like a problem with amp and/or speakers. What do you mean "big
bass speaker"? Are you talking about a subwoofer? Most subs have a
volume control on the rear panel.
wartburgritter wrote:
> I own a Squeeze Touch. The balance has a problem. One speaker is much
> more loud than the other. If I change the cable on the bass speakeron
> the box the balance is switched. Means the two small speaker work well
> and the wrong balance comes out of the big bass speaker
I own a Squeeze Touch. The balance has a problem. One speaker is much
more loud than the other. If I change on the box the loudness is
switched. Means the wrong balance comes out of the big bass speaker. Two
possibilities ... it is somehow adjusted or something is broken. But it
seams I can not c
chaug wrote:
> The only problem is that 'inguz requires at least a 2 GHz processor'
> (http://inguzaudio.com/installation/debian/) my LMS is on a NAS with
> less than that (a 1.8 GHz Atom single core, to be precise). In addition,
> the NAS runs on Debian Etch and I'm not sure whether that is supp
adamdea wrote:
> If you can manage to get the LMS inguz plugin working you can have all
> this and much more besides eg inter channel time delay, various stereo
> controls and even DRC; good luck.
The only problem is that 'inguz requires at least a 2 GHz processor'
(http://inguzaudio.com/install
chaug wrote:
> I'm also one of those wondering about balance control on the touch...
> Or should we give up on this?
If you can manage to get the LMS inguz plugin working you can have all
this and much more besides eg inter channel time delay, various stereo
controls and even DRC; good luck.
-
SlimChances wrote:
> Perhaps mentioned already, I haven't read all 7 pages of posts, but
> don't the older SB1 and SB2 have a balance control option? Seems to me
> there were also options for treble and base unless that has all gone
> away with firmware updates. It has been awhile since I used th
Perhaps mentioned already, I haven't read all 7 pages of posts, but
don't the older SB1 and SB2 have a balance control option? Seems to me
there were also options for treble and base unless that has all gone
away with firmware updates. It has been awhile since I used those but if
balance is really
I'm also one of those wondering about balance control on the touch...
Or should we give up on this?
chaug's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=47641
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/sho
Hi Steve,
nope I haven't released anything yet, been totally swamped time wise.
After the current projects go out the door I'll see if I can take a
week off work and get caught up on a few things. That is if my boss
will let me take some time off.
John S.
--
JohnSwenson
--
John:
I have been searching the forums for a L/R balance solution for the SB
Touch and found this post. Any progress on a solution? Maybe I missed
it somewhere in the forums, but I can not find any posted solutions.
Any useable implementation would be great.
Thanks,
Steve
--
sledwards
John
(Me too) It's certainly a wish rather than a need for me.
It would be nice to avoid having to buy an additional amp to split the
L + R channels.
--
onimod
onimod's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?us
JohnSwenson;583790 Wrote:
> I haven't touched it in several months. The balance part is working
> fine, the problem is getting the graphical elements to display properly
> in the window.
>
> I can probably throw together something quickly that just has a number
> readout and right and left butt
guidof;583603 Wrote:
> John:
>
> I for one would be very grateful for balance control, no matter how
> quick and dirty the implementation.
>
> Guido F.
I haven't touched it in several months. The balance part is working
fine, the problem is getting the graphical elements to display properly
in
JohnSwenson;540344 Wrote:
> I'm working on a quick and dirty implementation of a balance control
> right now. .
John:
I for one would be very grateful for balance control, no matter how
quick and dirty the implementation.
Guido F.
--
guidof
*Front End*: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso
JohnSwenson;540344 Wrote:
> I'm working on a quick and dirty implementation of a balance control
> right now. Its just going to be available from a Touch menu, no webUI,
> no dedicated buttons on the IR remote, but you should be able to use
> the arrow keys on the remote to navigate the menus and
May I add another use case for your consideration. I have a set of CDs
that consist of contra dance music played more slowly and simply than
normal so that musicians that play by ear and are not very proficient
can learn the tunes. The tunes have been recorded with the instruments
carrying the tun
... or hearing difficulties.
The use-case where it isn't "set & forget" has been exposed in this
thread already - sub-optimal recordings. In this use-case my opinion is
that the recording should be permanently fixed via editing, because then
it will be usuable on other players which may not have b
Mnyb;540374 Wrote:
>
> What I wonder here is. Is there any guideline or consensus for when a
> setting.
>
> 1. Should be local ?
>
> 2. Integrated with the squeezeboxserver ?
>
> 3. Integrated with squeezeboxserver and mysqueezebox.com ?
>
> 1 & 2 is possible for 3rd party devs to accompl
Daverz;540355 Wrote:
> This is an odd argument. Squeezeboxen are much more sophisticated and
> complicated than a typical dumb source device. Considering the
> complexity of the UI, a balance widget is pretty trivial.
That is what John S is cobbling together.
Buth others argue for a more comp
Daverz wrote:
> This is an odd argument. Squeezeboxen are much more sophisticated and
> complicated than a typical dumb source device. Considering the
> complexity of the UI, a balance widget is pretty trivial.
As I wrote in response to you earlier:
I don't really care, when they do it is fine
pfarrell;540327 Wrote:
> Daverz wrote:[color=blue]
> So the fact that your preamp is missing a feature that you desire
> makes
> you want it in your source devices?
>
This is an odd argument. Squeezeboxen are much more sophisticated and
complicated than a typical dumb source device. Consider
pfarrell;540327 Wrote:
>
> Nice Ad hominem attack.
>
An Ad hominem attack would be to call you a hater or buzzkill. I would
not consider the observation he made of your post an Ad hominem attack.
Just sayin'.
--
pounce
John,
Perhaps you can leverage one of the IR shortcuts that can be
programmed? e.g. Holding down the 4 or the 6 to move balance left or
right?
--
pounce
pounce's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12
I'm working on a quick and dirty implementation of a balance control
right now. Its just going to be available from a Touch menu, no webUI,
no dedicated buttons on the IR remote, but you should be able to use
the arrow keys on the remote to navigate the menus and virtually push
the buttons.
I do
Daverz wrote:
> I see your problem. You assume everyone else uses things the same way
> you do.
Nice Ad hominem attack.
> There is no balance control on my pre-amp, which is unfortunately typical
> for many "high
> end" pre-amps these days.
Correct, balance and tone controls have fallen o
pfarrell;540190 Wrote:
> Daverz wrote:[color=blue]
> This is the touch forum. Its hard to see how you need to adjust the
> balance much if you are close enough to use the touch screen.
>
I see your problem. You assume everyone else uses things the same way
you do. My Touch is in my equipment
Thanks. I appreciate everything below this line:
pippin;540295 Wrote:
>
> To begin with, let's answer your question (although for the 4th time)
--
pounce
pounce's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid
pippin;540295 Wrote:
>
> IR-Remotes are a bit in between. Actually I'm not sure whether they can
> directly act on the player part for the Touch (I think no but I'm not
> sure) but they can definitely act like a "mouse", just controlling the
> menu which means you can use them to activate any "l
pounce;540261 Wrote:
> Ok. Gotcha. If the server (running on another box) can control the Touch
> how is it doing this? What's the interface on the Touch that the Server
> would use to control aspects of the Touch?
Ok. Basics. Here's a 1x1 on how a Squeezebox works.
To begin with, let's answer y
Mnyb;540258 Wrote:
> The Controller can control the Touch if you have an external squeezebox
> server running, if you don't use the internal one.
> It's how most of use the Touch right now as a player without using the
> internal server option.
Ok. Gotcha. If the server (running on another box)
pounce;540253 Wrote:
> How does the IR code architecture work? When an IR command is captured
> by the hardware on the Touch what happens? Can I assume that there is
> some native library on the OS that captures that and somehow passed
> that to what you are calling the "server"?
>
> When I pre
How does the IR code architecture work? When an IR command is captured
by the hardware on the Touch what happens? Can I assume that there is
some native library on the OS that captures that and somehow passed
that to what you are calling the "server"?
When I press the ffw button the IR remote fo
Grahame;540214 Wrote:
> As an aside, I can't recall any LP Turntables or CD players that had
> built in balance controls. The touch is a 'source' component.
>
> If you want balance, have it as part of your post source -
> amplification / DSP / EQ etc.
>
> I regard the headphone out as a conveni
pounce;540239 Wrote:
> Not being as intimate with the inner working as much as you or many of
> the others...By Native I mean to add the functionality as core code and
> not in the form of an applet or otherwise.
>
That doesn't make any difference. Most functionality in the user
interface of the
pippin;540229 Wrote:
> What do you mean by "native"?
> The question is whether you implement this on the Touch (no remote
> control other than IR) like e.g. the diagnostics menu or in the server.
> The latter includes extensive UI work and probably settings sync with
> MySB and is less likely to
pounce;540213 Wrote:
> I was really suggesting something native.
What do you mean by "native"?
The question is whether you implement this on the Touch (no remote
control other than IR) like e.g. the diagnostics menu or in the server.
The latter includes extensive UI work and probably settings sy
pounce;540219 Wrote:
> In many cases, yes. I've found some good stuff on Archive.org. Perhaps I
> used the word bootleg wrong. ;)
>
>
>
> What are your thoughts about using the remote or a remote?
It's gonna be a lot harder to do that I'm afraid.
Personally, I'd DSP those "bootlegs"...
--
Phil Leigh;540216 Wrote:
> These "bootleg live concerts".. are they legal then :-)
>
In many cases, yes. I've found some good stuff on Archive.org. Perhaps
I used the word bootleg wrong. ;)
> It looks to be quite easy to implement...
What are your thoughts about using the remote or a remote?
pounce;540199 Wrote:
> When you are using the headphone out there isn't even a chance of other
> customer equipment between the Touch and the listener. This means that
> there is typically no way to put the issue of some form of balance
> control on the customer by using their receiver etc. This
As an aside, I can't recall any LP Turntables or CD players that had
built in balance controls. The touch is a 'source' component.
If you want balance, have it as part of your post source -
amplification / DSP / EQ etc.
I regard the headphone out as a convenience.
For serious headphone listenin
pippin;540212 Wrote:
> It would not work with the controller either without a plugin.
I was really suggesting something native.
--
pounce
pounce's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12645
View this
pounce;540195 Wrote:
> If this was really needed via remote I would imagine the two options
> would be using a Controller or using a universal remote. Implementing
> with a Controller would probably be the the most ideal since you would
> pick up a lot of functionality and would be dealing with S
pfarrell;540192 Wrote:
>
> > THE DEVICE HAS A HEADPHONE OUT ON IT. [/color]
>
> I completely don't follow this. Of course it has a headphone output,
> and
> if you use headphones, the one big argument that sometime you are not
> sitting in the sweet spot goes right out the window.
>
When you
If this was really needed via remote I would imagine the two options
would be using a Controller or using a universal remote. Implementing
with a Controller would probably be the the most ideal since you would
pick up a lot of functionality and would be dealing with SqueezeOS on
both devices, but
pounce wrote:
> I'm curious if you are challenging the need for some people at all or
> you are trying to get a sense of the importance of it to determine if
> you believe the feature is one that should be added.
I'm not Phil, but unless shown otherwise, I think its a feature of low
value for 99%
Daverz wrote:
> pfarrell;540023 Wrote:
>> And a more modern solution to this problem is to use an audio editor
>> on the data file, and adjust it once.
> Balance is very subjective and easiest done with a remote from the
> listening position. Not everyone is set up to do this conveniently
> with
pounce;540176 Wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. Your question:
>
>
>
> ..does come across a bit challenging, but forums are silent and we
> don't have any visual cues to know how we mean things. I think the
> 'really' in the question gave the tone.
Not really. It's merely a term of ampli
Well, the main point here is what Erland mentioned: It is probably very
easy to implement a balance control on the Touch itself, it's much more
challenging to make this remotely controllable.
The one thing I'm fearing here is that we are getting a lot of these
examples: Things you can do on the d
Thanks for the clarification. Your question:
>
> Do you really adjust balance a lot/often?
>
..does come across a bit challenging, but forums are silent and we
don't have any visual cues to know how we mean things. I think the
'really' in the question gave the tone.
--
pounce
-
pounce;540163 Wrote:
> Phil,
>
> I'm curious if you are challenging the need for some people at all or
> you are trying to get a sense of the importance of it to determine if
> you believe the feature is one that should be added.
>
> THE DEVICE HAS A HEADPHONE OUT ON IT.
>
> I don't think it'
pounce;540163 Wrote:
>
> I think it would be better for Logitech to be making this kind of
> statement unless we enjoy being totally negative and want to help give
> customers the impression (real or not) that development on this new
> product is poorly supported and that they should just return
Phil Leigh;540116 Wrote:
> Do you really adjust balance a lot/often?
Phil,
I'm curious if you are challenging the need for some people at all or
you are trying to get a sense of the importance of it to determine if
you believe the feature is one that should be added.
THE DEVICE HAS A HEADPHONE
Phil Leigh;540116 Wrote:
> Do you really adjust balance a lot/often?
Phil,
I'm curious if you are challenging the need for some people at all or
you are trying to get a sense of the importance of it to determine if
you believe the feature is one that should be added.
THE DEVICE HAS A HEADPHONE
Phil Leigh;540116 Wrote:
> Do you really adjust balance a lot/often?
I don't have a balance control on my pre-amp! I bought into the whole
audiophile purity thing, regrettably. No balance control, tone
controls, loudness, etc. I did have a balance control on my older gear
and did use it occasi
Daverz;540105 Wrote:
> Balance is very subjective and easiest done with a remote from the
> listening position. Not everyone is set up to do this conveniently
> with a DAW.
Do you really adjust balance a lot/often?
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl
pfarrell;540023 Wrote:
>
> And a more modern solution to this problem is to use an audio editor
> on
> the data file, and adjust it once.
>
Balance is very subjective and easiest done with a remote from the
listening position. Not everyone is set up to do this conveniently
with a DAW.
--
D
pounce wrote:
> Just sayin' that while it can sometimes seem like it's
> obvious to adjust the content the feature has some real purpose for some
> people.
I don't think anyone is arguing with you that for some people some of
the time, a balance control can be useful.
It might even be a useful
Don't forget that the humans sometimes in their older years or after
some damage in their youth lose some hearing and require adjustments
left and right. Just sayin' that while it can sometimes seem like it's
obvious to adjust the content the feature has some real purpose for some
people.
--
p
Daverz;54 Wrote:
> One use for a balance control is for those occasional recordings where
> the balance is off.
Move slightly left and right until the balance is not "off."
--
pski
real stereo doesn't wake neighbors (it enrages them)
.
---
Daverz wrote:
> One use for a balance control is for those occasional recordings where
> the balance is off.
And a more modern solution to this problem is to use an audio editor on
the data file, and adjust it once.
My main audiophile amp does not even have a balance control. I don't
think I've u
One use for a balance control is for those occasional recordings where
the balance is off.
--
Daverz
Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/s
I imagine for 99% of users this would be a "set & forget" setting...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 51
JohnSwenson;539662 Wrote:
> Yep it certainly looks doable. All it needs is a UI now! The problem is
> the now playing screen is already pretty full of stuff, it would either
> have to be redesigned or an additional screen be added, OR it put
> somewhere else. Then there is the question do you wan
Yep it certainly looks doable. All it needs is a UI now! The problem is
the now playing screen is already pretty full of stuff, it would either
have to be redesigned or an additional screen be added, OR it put
somewhere else. Then there is the question do you want it in the webUI,
and do you want
News
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77837
Peter searched for way to lock Volume.
But this proves that there are gainL and gainR variables in lua , so
maybe no C compiling needed ?
I wont know really I don't do code.
Btw If you want to have balance but say goodbye to your volume
Balance is something that theoretically can be done, but its probably
not trivial. My guess is that it will take modifying the C code that is
implementing the volume control so its not even something that can be
implemented as a patch. On top of that you need a GUI for specifying
it. It should als
very few 2 channel preamps come with balance controls anymore, including
mine. it is a feature that was built into the sonos, and one that i
found was very helpful.
--
ratso
Emerald Physics CS2.3's - Odyssey Stratos/Khartago amps (coming soon) -
Supratek Chardonnay Preamp - Slim Devices Touch
Daverz;539139 Wrote:
> I don't see a reason that a whole host of digital effects could not be
> offered in the interface. The needed software (e.g. sox) is there.
Would only work if you have a squeeseboxserver on a fairly powerfull
machine. not onboard the Touch itself.
It's must be much more
I don't see a reason that a whole host of digital effects could not be
offered in the interface. The needed software (e.g. sox) is there.
--
Daverz
Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
V
I don't see a reason that a whole host of digital effects could be
offered in the interface. The needed software (e.g. sox) is there.
--
Daverz
Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View
no, probably because that's usually a function of the preamp or
receiver, not the source.
--
aubuti
aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/sho
75 matches
Mail list logo
