+1. Atleast in the spirit of getting this going for now to enable people to
get on with the r Trunk rightaway as one piece than having to first deal
with its composition. Thanks.
- Venkat
On 3/28/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here's the vote on this I said [1] I'd start to get clo
Hi,
I whole-heartedly admit to the comfort of being able to run and debug within
IDE. Its really very useful to get a grasp of how the runtime works. For
example, if one were to understand the role of loaders, builders, the wire
service and the invocation pattern, running a sample test or an i
+1.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
auth
Hi,
When promoting a component reference to the composite level, the specs says
that if an interface is specified in the composite reference it must be a
superset of what is specified for the component reference that is being
promoted. To do this I reused the CheckCompatibility method in the
'Wi
Hi Jim,
Thanks for sharing this information - its really useful.
- Venkat
On 3/22/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
We just finished the ServerSide demo and I figured I send a mail to
the list outlining how it went...
We had the slot following the opening keynote and were up aga
Hi,
For this to happen, mustn't reference211 first be promoted to its composite
level i.e. as a reference of Composite2. For a component reference that is
not wired, I did not find the specs (from whatever I read and understood) as
saying it will be automatically promoted to the composite level.
Hi Jeremy,
As part of this discussion and vote could we also summarize the technical
reasons for each of us to be going one way or the other. Since this is a
major decision point it would be good for everybody to know why we as a
community are taking a specific direction and helps us to get back
Hi,
My view is that, if the design that Sebastien is proposing is a step forward
in our modularization goals then its good to get it into the trunk. I like
the design and here is my +1 to move this into the trunk. IMO, moving to
the trunk does not mean the kernel will have to be immediately in
ing, then this lookup call will be delegate to the
underlying ComponentType. Opinions ?
Since these changes affect the core, far and wide I am about taking sometime
to ensure that I don't break consistencies.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 3/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[sn
Hi,
I also see that all our loaders use string literals to load attributes from
the SCDL for e.g. the name of a component or property and so on. I am
wondering if it would be good to define these as constants somewhere - for
example attributes related to Property element could be defined in the
w in the
kernel unless you see some issues.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 3/13/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> comments inline
>
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to bring the SPI model and t
Hi,
I am trying to bring the SPI model and the Loaders in sync with the current
level of the specs as available on OSOA site. I am currently looking at
'references' - as and how they are defined in ComponentType,
ComponentDefinition and Composite and have the following questions: -
With respec
+1 Yes, I too felt that's just about lying there. Thanks for doing this.
- Venkat
On 3/9/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The sca-api-r0.95 module does not seem to be used anymore. If there is
no objection I'll remove it from the integration branch tomorrow morning.
--
of a wire are Components and
there is data transformation that is going to happen on the wire I wonder if
it is valid to assume that any transformed data will not contain any
reference to the original data - and is as good as a copy.
Thoughts ?
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 3/7/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EM
+1
- Venkat
On 3/4/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/t
Hi,
Yes, we did agree on this. I don't think this check is in place in the
WirePostProcessor. Will take a look and fix that.
Also, in general, I think we intended to skip this copying if there has been
a data transformation performed ahead, in the wire. So, is it safe to
simply check if the s
Hi,
Its really good if we can have sampleapps out - to have another bigbank in
it is quite confusing, for me. With respect to the naming conventions, yes,
it would be good to have them all uniform, and I prefer something as
loanAppConversation_ws as against loanappconversationws which is quite
p
Hi,
Thanks. I like this sort of naming and really helps in identifying scdls
better.
- Venkat
On 2/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Dan Murphy wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> On the move SCDL files... where were you planning to move them to
> (META-INF/scdl, or up f
Hi Jeremy,
I'll take care of this, when I sync up the trunk for complex and multivalued
properties later down this week.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 2/26/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> The xml type for a property can be from the intros
setting the
value factory to a PropertyValue instance we have to choose between one of
these two based on whether the property supports 'many' values or not.
- Venkat
On 2/21/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
>
+1 and thanks Jeremy.
- Venkat
On 2/20/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In prep for release, I plan to update the project-wide parent pom to
reflect project-wide settings. Attached is the delta I plan to make
compared to M2 but in brief the changes are:
* change the version to 2-i
type and
hence might require just one factory instance to create them all. So my
suggestion is that these factories return a list of instances. In the
single valued case this list just contains one value while in other cases it
contains multiple instances.
Thoughts / Suggestions ?
Thanks.
- Venk
Hi,
I have just looked at 'many valued properties' in the recent Assembly Model
specs and have some questions. Could somebody please help me with
clarifications.
There are two samples on multivalued properties. One where the property is
of simple type ..
EURO
Yen
Hi Raymond,
Thanks for pointing this out. Will take care of this.
- Venkat
On 2/13/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It seems that the property has a different attribute name in the assembly
model than the java C&I spec.
Assembly: noDefault="true"
Java C&I: @Property(required
Hi,
I am fixing this in the SCA-Java-Int branch now and will move over to do the
same in the Trunk as well very soon.
- Venkat
On 2/13/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:11 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
> Agreed, however, it is not apparent from that test what is reall
and PassByValueInterceptor question
> Hi, Venkat.
>
> I think it's reasonable to add an attribute "allowsPassByReference" to
the
> Operation model. We already have "remotable" in the ServiceContract. The
> java introspection can set the attribute.
>
> Than
Sebastien, Thanks.
- Venkat
On 2/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Venkat,
Some answers inline.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just took a look at the latest assembly model specs and find a
> couple of
> things that I don't understand.
Hi Jim,
The PassByValueWirePostProcessor sure needs an update in the sense that it
only looks for allowsPassByReference at the interface level. It needs to do
this at the operation level as well.
My imagination is to have this information as part of 'Operation' which
presently has things like i
s Confluence backed up regularly?
>>
>> Does it make sense to leave the website skeleton as is and move all
>> documents to confluence WIKI? For example FAQ, design docs, release
>> information and downloads, etc.
>>
>> It took us a while to get the website look and fe
Hi,
Heres my opinion from the perspective of some items that I have owned up to
do quite a while back - support for complex properties and multivalued
properties. I'd see them as some fundamental things that a user might
expect to see out of our next milestone and am happy that they are a part o
Hi,
I just took a look at the latest assembly model specs and find a couple of
things that I don't understand. Could somebody help me out with
clarifications.
i) There are two different illustrations for the schema for a property
element...
*
default-property-value?
*
Hi,
I just took a look at the latest assembly model specs and find a couple of
things that I don't understand. Could somebody help me out with
clarifications.
i) There are two different illustrations for the schema for a property
element...
*
default-property-value?
*
Hi,
With respect to the Java2WSDL tool I wish to trim quite of bit of it as most
of what we need has now been incorporated into the Axis2 tool over which
ours has just been a wrapper providing only the missing things. So AFAICT,
the only thing that our Java2WSDL wrapper could add over the curren
Hi Kelvin,
In my perception, we are moving over to the Confluence wiki - CWIKI. Infact
some of the recent updates such as things we aspire to do for SCA M3, some
documentation on SCA Deployment and FAQs have already found place there.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 2/6/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Jeremy, Jim, Meeraj,
I assume that runtime/standalone/assembly is going to be the way a SCA
Runtime will be started. Is this right?
Is there any test or sample in the trunk that can be used to understand how
to program a sca client for example things like how to get hold of a
ComponentContex
Hi,
Is the SCATestcase way of launching the runtime and testing out things OUT.
Could somebody please help me out on how I can run a sample from within the
IDE and be able to debug the core. For example I am trying to run the
Calculator sample's testcase from within the IDE with the intention of
Hi,
Thanks for doing this and is really very useful. This really gives me a
good picture of how our implementation stands against the specs. We can be
doubly sure that beside bringing in lots of added value we do fundamentally
cover the specs. Secondly, your point on new comers or may be even
Hi,
The build is going through with r502344. Thanks.
- Venkat
*
*
On 2/2/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
Thank you so much for staying late to fix the problem.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
d we merge it into the core where we already
have transformers dealing with XML parsing technologies.
BTW, we also fix some checkstyle violations.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007
Hi Ant,
First thanks for doing this. Wherther or not for the other cases, I very
strongly feel we must merge the samples and sampleapps as its quite
confusing to new comers.
- Venkat
On 2/1/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we could still do more. For example how about any of:
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-925) Complex properties not
su
{
return null;
}
}
Thanks for helping all the way :)
- Venkat
On 1/29/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monda
Hi Raymond,
I looked up the current implementation and have some queries regarding your
suggestions. Please help me with some clarifications inline. Thanks
- Venkat
On 1/26/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
I think we should reorganize the code to match what we envis
Hi Raymond,
Thank you. I shall work on this refactoring.
- Venkat
On 1/26/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
I think we should reorganize the code to match what we envisioned before.
Here's the basic idea:
1) The property values are loaded as DOM objects by the runtime
Thanks Luciano.
On 1/24/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just done the svn update on the people machine.
On 1/23/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been able to add pages to the WIKI and have added some skeleton
&
during the day.
- Venkat
On 1/22/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right. So how do we go about this. I wanted to create a new page on
that WIKI but seems I have no permission. If somebody can help me about how
to do this, then I will create the page and post Geoffs q&a.
Hi Luciano,
I am just about sharing my experience in this without going too much into
what you are doing. Hope this helps. If you still have problems, let me
know and I will take a detailed look into this.
I assume you are trying to test an ImplementationLoader for its handling of
duplicate co
> > > does?
> > > No. It is not clear that this is a useful feature in a language
like
> C++
> > > so we have no plans
> > > to implement it.
> > >
> > > Thank you for your help.
> > >
> > > Regards,
>
Hi Geoff,
Since I have done this before I can help if you can simply provide the
udpated faq.xml. I shall take care of building it to html and then updating
the site. Let me know.
- Venkat
On 1/19/07, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Geoff,
Take a look at
http://svn.apache.org/
+1
- Venkat
On 1/17/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributin
Hi,
I think I figured out the problem. I should get the fix up over to the
website over tonight.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/23/06, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's a formatting problem with the new Web site (great work, Venkat!)
that shows up when viewing the site with IE 6.0. See
n implementation for the SCA specification
that
> is available on www.osoa.org"
>
It should be specifications not specification as there are a numnber of
them. How about "Tuscany Java SCA provides an implementation for
the SCA specifications that are available on www.osoa.org"?
Hi all,
Thanks for looking this up and giving in your feedback. I have taken in the
comments from each of you and have made the necessary changes. Please check
them out at http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/.
Unless I hear any significant change to be made, I plan to co
Hi All,
I have uploaded the proposed version of our site at
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/.
Please take a look and give your feed back on things that needs changes. At
the present moment here are somethings that yet need to be addressed: -
- The Release page for eac
Hi,
On the weekly IRC today we have decided to go ahead with the changes
proposed for our website. The proposed one can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/site-publish/.
To this it is planned that we do the following:
i) Sync up with the contents of the current website as there
Hi Jeremy,
There is a proposal for some changes to our website that is lying in
http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/site-publish/. I have had not
inputs from the community on whether I can go ahead and commit that. What
is your opinion on this?
I will be asking the community 'yet again' to
to the public Web
site
at the same time as we make SCA Java M2 available for download. This has
now been approved by the IPMC, so I'm hoping we can make it live for
download,
with the new Web pages, some time today or tomorrow.
Simon
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Tha
Hi,
This mail thread having got very long, here is a summary of where we stand
and where I seek help from the community.
1) PassByValue is enforced by the way of PassByValueInterceptor that is
added to the inbound chain of the producer / server component.
2) The PassByValueInterceptor copies th
Hi Simon,
Thanks. There was a 'Getting Started' that I put up in the changed website
that I proposed a while ago -
http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/site-publish/getting_started.html.
Maybe the one you have composed now is more current and detailed. But then
we still need to take a call o
HI,
I am making some attempts to understand the DataBinding fwk and so shall say
something here so that others will help me understand better. My apologies
if I have mentioned something outrageous as I am just about entering into
this discussion :)
- By employing the databinding interceptors we
ource type to a target type and then back to the source
type, returning a copy at the end of it all.
Thanks for reading this far and please let me know your thoughts on all of
this.
- Venkat
On 12/13/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Raymond,
Thanks. Am going ahead
ou can just add the copy(...) method to
"org.apache.tuscany.spi.DataBinding".
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:39 AM
Subject: Re: Pass-by-value support for remotable interfac
Hi Raymond,
Here is what I have thought about the databinding dependent copying: -
- Create an interface called 'DataCopier' that has 'copy' and
'getDataBinding' methods.
- Have various databindings implement this interface. For example
OMElementCopier, SDOCopier and so on.
- In the PassByValue
+1
- Venkat
On 12/9/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A vote to release the following artifacts as the incubator-M2
distribution of Tuscany SCA Java:
Artifacts for distribution:
http://people.apache.org/~jboynes/tuscany-M2/tuscany-sca-1.0-
incubator-M2-bin.tar.gz
http://people.apa
Hi,
I guess there is a variable "offline" that you must set to true when
running the launcher to run the samples. java -jar bin\launcher
offline=true I checked up with the code for the system.getProperty it
uses and I find 'offline' there as well. So hope this works for you.:)
- Venkat
Hi Jim,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/7/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Venkat,
Comments inline.
On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Raymond,
>
> Thanks. Will take a look at your comments and get some understanding.
+1 (and thanks for all the release work)
- Venkat
On 12/7/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has a dependency on the following artifacts that were uploaded
with SDO but were not actually part of that vote:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/osoa/sca-
api
have
this annotation. Is there a better way?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/7/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
I'll review the path. Please see my comments below.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
s also changing arg2 implicitly. Am I
making sense ?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 1:52 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way I can control the order in which the
> WirePostProcessors are
> loa
- Venkat
On 12/6/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way I can control the order in which the WirePostProcessors
are loaded. For example I would always want the PassByValue processor to be
called last so that I ensure that the PassByValue interceptor is at the he
Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI Jim,
Yes, the pass-by-value interceptor will come first exactly for the reasons
you have mentioned. I will get a testcase across soon.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:51
HI Jim,
Yes, the pass-by-value interceptor will come first exactly for the reasons
you have mentioned. I will get a testcase across soon.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:51 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thi
e InvokerInterceptor.
So.. I am moving forward for now. Thanks for the help.
- Venkat
On 12/5/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:34 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for helping :). Well, let me ask away very simply
>
>
w and probably testcase is the only
way out.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 12/5/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comments inline...
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Raymond,
>
> Yes, I am debugging to figure out quite a few things.
>
> I jus
be a bit
tricky to make sure the new interceptor is added to the correct position.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Pass-by-value support for remotable interfaces
>
Hi Yang,
Really not sure if you bulid SCA and DAS to get thro to SDO. There was a
mail from Jeremy were he put down the order in which these things should be
built will see if I can trace that. But I vividly remember having to
build SDO for SCA and not viceversa.
- Venkat
On 12/5/06, Yang
unteering. I opened a JIRA
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-969 and attached some
prototype
code there. Hopefully it can get you started.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Venkata Krishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 10:08 PM
S
Hi Raymond,
I'm interested in helping with this. It will give me a chance to work with
the service invocation paths of the core. Let me know if there is something
that I help with.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 11/30/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Mik
ECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 1, 2006, at 3:27 AM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking into Java2WSDL in Tuscany. The relationship
> between
> what we have in Tuscany to that in Axis2 is that the Tuscany one is a
> wrapper. We started doing this because during the
Hi,
If we admit what Simon has found in the first place is indeed an
inconsistency then I believe we must rectify that and if this patch goes
well that way then it should be committed. Furthermore, I guess Simon's
gone and spent some valuable time over this patch on our invitation to do
that. S
Hi,
I have been looking into Java2WSDL in Tuscany. The relationship between
what we have in Tuscany to that in Axis2 is that the Tuscany one is a
wrapper. We started doing this because during the M1 time there were a
couple of things that need to be fixed in Axis2. We did that under the
covers
Hi,
I did a clean build of the databinding stuff alone and it goes thro for me.
- Venkat
On 11/28/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I just tried and it works fine for me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, Nov
Hi,
My opinion is that 'we release what we have presently because IMO we should
not be pushing M2 any further. It would also be good if we can publish the
potential problem in our website and ask users to check back at the website
for patches. This way we just get done with M2 and move forward.
Hi,
This is not fixed in M2. But then you might want to try the current trunk
where this is fixed.
- Venkat
On 11/27/06, 胡昊 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I use the , the UnRecognizedElementException.will be
thrown. Can this problem be resolved when the M2 releases?
Hi,
There is NPL in the License.txt. I remember Jeremy mentioning that we don't
include this since we don't distribute Rhino.
- Venkat
On 11/23/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the src disb, cleaned up my maven repo and built. The cor
Hi,
I downloaded the src disb, cleaned up my maven repo and built. The core is
failing for PropertyHelperTestCase. I pulled this over to eclipse to figure
out the problem and tried running this testcase alone. It succeeded there.
Now I am not sure if I am missing something or there is somethin
Hi,
Thanks for showing interest in Tuscany. If you are looking for a sample
there is simple on that is available in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sca-java-M2/samples/standalone/calculator-combowhich
demonstrates the composite implementation.
All of our samples have
Hi,
Also, could we please take a call on what we want to do with what's in
http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/site-publish/ ? Do we set that
aside and continue with the one that is live today?
Thanks
- Venkat
On 11/21/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 21/11/06, Jean-
Jim / Mike... thank you very much.
- Venkat
On 11/21/06, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Venkat,
Yes, Jim describes things correctly - I can give you access to the
Issues list for the specs.
Yours, Mike.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been hearing about
Hi,
I have been hearing about 'issues #' with respect to the specs, on some
discussions. Could somebody help me understand how and where I can get hold
of these issues. I looked up the OSOA site for some links to this but did
not find any (could be I am missing it).
Thanks
- Venkat
On 11/17/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/16/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >> The C++ schema doesn't actually include the script attribute used
> >> above (preferring module instead) - script is supported in the
> >> implementation.
>
> Andy
Hi Jim
I have been looking into this under
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-921 and have posted a patch.
Could you please take a quick look and let me know your opinions. I am
eager to hear your views on what I have asked in that JIRA under comments.
Thanks.
- Venkat
Hi,
I have tried my best to explain... just in case something is not right in
this could somebody pitch in please.
Thanks.
- Venkat
On 11/14/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All
I have updated (Tuscany-904) with a new version of the DAS container.
This is based on the in
Hi Luciano,
Presently there are some unit tests in the JavaScript and Ruby containers.
You could probably get to do similar ones for DAS as well. Though you might
have to cover a little more I am sure you will get a good idea of how to go
about this on you take a look at them.
- Venkat
On 11
Hi Jim,
Please help me understand this... all of what I mention here is in the
context of explicit wire defintions.. i.e. wires defined in scdl by the
'wire' element.
As per the specs it seems like the source of a "wire" could be a composite's
service's reference. If this is the case can I have
Hi,
Is the Webinar going to go as part of next report ? Let me know and I can
add it to the wiki. Thanks.
- Venkat
On 11/11/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've posted the report based on feedback at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2006?action=show
If there is somethi
+1
- Venkat
On 11/9/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 09/11/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 11/9/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/9/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to nominate Geoff Winn to become
Jim / Raymond it was really very well done. Thanks for all the efforts.
- Venkat
On 11/9/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you all, it was very good...
Do we know the attendance numbers ?
- Luciano
On 11/8/06, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nicely done. Than
On 11/9/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:23 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From whatever little I understand I would imagine that the config.
> info is
> something that you will inject in as component properties. i.e. have a
Hi,
From whatever little I understand I would imagine that the config. info is
something that you will inject in as component properties. i.e. have a
property in the DAS ComponentType to inject the source of this config info
(could be a the config filename or a URL that you can open and read th
501 - 600 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
