get(i)).getName() with say "DataGraphRoot"
//and if it matches use that type
}
Or otherwise, the client will be forced to use a new instance of
HelperContext each
time.
Am I missing something here?
Regards,
Amita
On 7/20/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&g
tch
//((Type)lst.get(i)).getName() with say "DataGraphRoot"
//and if it matches use that type
}
Or otherwise, the client will be forced to use a new instance of
HelperContext each
time.
Am I missing something here?
Regards,
Amita
On 7/20/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please vote to release the 1.0-incubating distribution of Tuscany SDO for
Java
The release candidate RC2 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution files
are posted at [1]
The release audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are posted at
[1] also
The maven repository artifacts are posted
Please review and vote to release the 1.0-incubating distribution of Tuscany
SDO for Java
The release candidate RC3 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution files
are posted at [1]
The release audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are posted at
[1] also
The maven repository artifacts
Hi Amita,
The serialization of the opposite property reference in the graph looks
like it is suffering from an issue that was reported in TUSCANY-1421 and is
now fixed in the trunk/1.0 release.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 26/07/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Current RDB DAS
e: [Java SDO, SCA and DAS] change of group id and artifact name
> for sdo api maven artifact
> To: kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> When would you like to apply this? How about later on today and I'll do
> the
> associated changes as well?
>
>...ant
>
sion}",
> commonj.sdo.helper;version="${specVersion},
> commonj.sdo.impl;version="${specVersion}"
>
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
> 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>
> 2.0
>
>
>
> package
> package
>
>
> > ${pom.name}
> > > ${pom.description}
> > > ${pom.organization.name}
> > > plugin
> > > commonj.sdo
> > >
> > > commonj.sdo;version="${specVersion}",
> > > commonj.sdo.helper;version="${specVersion},
> > > commonj.
he samples readme exists only on binary distribution,
> there is no samples readme on source distribution.Shouldn't the source
> distribution contain the samples readme?
>
> Regards,
> Adriano Crestani
>
> On 7/28/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
&
commonj.sdo.helper;version="${specVersion},
> commonj.sdo.impl;version="${specVersion}"
>
>
>
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-javadoc-plugin
> 2.3-SNAPSHOT
>
> 2.0
>
>
>
> package
> package
>
> jar
>
>
&g
Please review and vote to release the 1.0-incubating distribution of
Tuscany SDO for Java
The release candidate RC4 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution
files are posted at [1]
The release audit tool (rat) files and associated exceptions are
posted at [1] also
The maven repository artifacts a
I just fixed the permission in the sdo part of the maven snapshot
repo, as described in [1], so that all committers should be able to
publish snapshots. I also published a new snapshot.
Kelvin.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg20908.html
---
Amita,
I only just got to this, buried in a mountain of things I need to
catch up on. Here's the reference you were looking for I think.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200701.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Kelvin.
On 10/07/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H
Yes Pete, you are correct. The XML schema sequence concept fixes the
order of elements in that sequence. The SDO Sequence concept is there
to preserve the instance ordering of elements when the metadata does
not fix it.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 03/08/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A
I think you need the fix in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1408 that is part of the
1.0-incubating release which is currently being voted on.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 25/07/07, Upeka Bulumulle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tuscany SDO version: Tuscany SDO 1.0 beta1.
>
> I'm t
Adriano,
are you still seeing this. Could you attach a zip of the stack
traces please?
Regards, Kelvin.
On 03/08/07, Adriano Crestani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> java version "1.5.0_12"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build
Can anyone point me to the info for using GroboUtils in a maven
environment please? I've googled around and found a couple of change
notifications to very old poms that show use of GroboUtils, but they
lead me up blind alleys. I guess what I need is the artifactId,
groupId and hosting repository
sounds sensible to me, +1 to handling this within Axis2.
Kelvin.
On 09/08/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thats right, these are the Axis2 tools just with some patches on top to add
> support for SDOs and to fix bugs we've come across before we got the bugs
> fixed in the Axis2 code.
The vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating has completed
with 5 +1 votes being cast (3 IPMC binding) and no -1s (see the
tuscany-dev list vote thread [1] and the incubator-general vote
approval thread [2]). Thank you for reviewing and voting.
I will therefore proceed with the deploymen
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.0-incubating release
of the Java SDO project.
This project provides an implementation of the SDO 2.1 specification
[1] and this is our first release to provide full coverage of the
specification. In addition to completing the few remaining SDO
There are no plans in place yet for the next SDO release.
1.0-incubating would seem the obvious choice.
Kelvin.
On 28/08/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be my guess unless there's a newer SDO release by then but i've
> not seen any mention of that in the SDO emails.
>
> ...
Is this still an issue? It looks odd, because the stack trace
includes FactoryBase which is in the impl jar, where the SDOFactory
interface also resides.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 13/08/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From the stack trace below, this doesn't really sound like
Having released 1.0-incubating, what are the priorities for SDO Java now.
I'm just catching up on reading the lists having taken a break. The
major things I had in mind before going away were to
- rearrange the project structure to permit generation of java classes
during maven tests (TUSCANY-1
t; attention to the first two items you listed below - test generated static
> > SDO APIs and multi-threaded scenario more easily.
> >
> > I did some investigation on GroboUtils for multi-thread testing and still
> > couldn't find any remote repository hosting the tool
I agree with ant. I had an issue recently with SDO relying on a
back-level release that had been removed.So I think the thing to
do is to help new users avoid the trip hazard of inadvertently
downloading a back level release by structuring our web pages
helpfully.
Kelvin.
On 30/08/2007, ant
utting a branch and working on
> > a DAS release sometime this week. Please let me know if there is any
> > changes in plan.
> >
> > On 8/28/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There are no plans in place yet for the next SDO release.
> >
On 12/09/2007, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So how about trying to graduate Tuscany from the Incubator? :-)
+1
>
> We seem close though there are a few things to sort out so it will take a
> couple of months to get ready.
>
> There's a draft proposal at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluenc
I've been playing with the RC1a release candidate and came across a
problem particular to my environment which took me a while to figure
out. When trying to run a sample I was getting ...
C:\Release\apache-tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating\tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating\samples\calculator>ant
run
Buildfile:
I can run the calculator in 4 seconds, -- time until I see the "Run"
word on the screen approx 2 secs and then a further 2 before I see the
result output.
Kelvin.
On 17/09/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a local distro from the branch and the samples seem to take ages to
> ge
] 3 - 2=1.0
[java] 3 * 2=6.0
[java] 3 / 2=1.5
[java] Java Result: 1
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 8 minutes 4 seconds
Terminate batch job (Y/N)? y
On 17/09/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can run the calculator in 4 seconds, -- time until I see the &qu
I just checked the LICENSE file against the lib directory of RC1c.
I'm sure this process could be more automated given time, but for
reference here's what I did
cd lib
ls | sed "s/[0-9\.]*\.jar//" > libnoversion.txt
then I hand finessed the list to remove more complex version tags such
as beta1
a few, i checked in the changes about an hour ago.
Kelvin.
On 18/09/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I just checked the LICENSE file against the lib directory of RC1c.
>
I'm now seeing a couple of issues with the samples. One is that I
have to run "ant compile" before "ant run" in all cases I have tried
so far. The other is that I now see samples such as "calculator"
executing and completing, but taking 18 seconds to complete rather
than the 4 I reported yesterd
Windows XP
On 18/09/2007, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant run works fine with a few that I ran using RC2 bin distro.
> I am running on windows. What are you running on Kelvin?
>
> On 9/18/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > I&
>> > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 1:54 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: sample start up time?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Is that also going to help the shutdown hang problem?
> >> > >
> >> > > ...ant
> >> > >
> &
The source distro now has a reference to quote-xquery in the top level
pom, but the sample code is not included in the distro.
C:\Release\SCA\1.0\RC3\src\tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating-src>mvn clean
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO] --
repository),
central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository),
apache.ws (http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository/)
On 19/09/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The sour
Hi ant,
I had a brief sweep through the build code for SCA to see if I could
fix the xquery source distro to see if I could supply a patch with the
JIRA, but I couldn't see that it was configurable; I guess either I
missed something this is a manual export step.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 19/09/2007,
.zone
+Apache WS Zone Repository
+http://ws.zones.apache.org/repository2
+
+true
+
+
+false
+
+
works for me.
Kelvin.
On 19/09/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
That's where mine now fails too.
On 19/09/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/19/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/19/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson &l
Works for me.
--
Kelvin.
On 19/09/2007, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > If I remove the xquery-quotes reference
> wrote:
> On 9/19/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/19/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That's where mine now fails too.
> > >
> > > On 19/09/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
I have just seen Simon Laws' earlier note about my first issue.
Kelvin.
On 19/09/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having a sequence of non-reproducible issues building from this tag
>
> f
lper:add-test-source {execution: add-test-source}]
> > [INFO] Test Source directory:
> > F:\Tag_1.0\modules\wsdl2java\target\sdo-source
> > added.
> > [INFO] [resources:resources]
> > [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
> > Downloading:
> > htt
ilt some
> webapp samples with the Ant scripts. It all seems to work. Anyone else say
> yes or no soon or shall i just call a vote on it?
>
>...ant
>
> On 9/19/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/19/07, Simon Laws <[EMA
> Congratulations and welcome Simon!
>
hear hear!!
Kelvin.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Kelvin.
On 19/09/2007, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please review and vote on the 1.0 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-RC3a/
>
> The artifacts are available for review
You are right, as far as I understand it's just history/legacy. If
there's a volunteer to help clean this up and make the jars more
friendly that would be really great; I don't have a detailed
understanding of what's best here.
Kelvin.
On 26/09/2007, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Comments inline ...
Kelvin.
On 02/10/2007, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Question in SDO -
> ChangeSummary changeSummary = root.getDataGraph().getChangeSummary();
> List changedDOs = commonj.sdo.ChangeSummary.getChangedDataObjects();
>
> is changedDOs an ordered list with o
On 27/09/2007, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> My pennyworth:
>
>
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
> that simplifies the development of service oriented applications and
> pro
On 27/09/2007, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote:
> >
> > Paul Fremantle wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> My pennyworth:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> a Project Management Committee c
I've been thinking about the CTS a bit lately; trying to take stock of
what we've got, and how we measure up. The CTS went through a period
of healthy growth a while back, but I didn't manage to get a good feel
for how well we were covering the API combined with the range of
possible inputs to it
I took a look at some code a week or so back, which provided for
adding the feature of notification of value changes to arbitrary
observers, designed for use in user interfaces in JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527. I made a copy of
SDO in my sandbox [1] and modified our SDO c
listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> > Apache Tuscany Project:
> >
> > Adriano Crestani > org>
> > Andrew Borley
> > Andy Grove
ApacheCon Europe is coming up, 7th to 11th of April 2008 [1], and the
deadline for submission of abstracts is coming up fast, on 26th of
this month.
What should we aim to do here?
The options seem to be
(60 minutes) Multi-person panel discussion
(60 minutes) Normal presentation
Intensive topica
Amita,
The detail of the nature of the merge you want to perform is not
completely clear, but you should be aware that inserting a DataObject
of a Type that has a ChangeSummary property into a data graph wrapped
in a DataGraph instance would violate the constraint that the scope of
monitoring of
11/10/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/9/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ApacheCon Europe is coming up, 7th to 11th of April 2008 [1], and the
> > deadline for submission of abstracts is coming up fast, on 26th
nd Geronimo.
> > Some of the interesting topics that are under discussion in Apache
> > Tuscany will be highlighted.
> >
> > The talk will be complemented with a demo to demonstrate how easy it is
> > to use Apache Tuscany to develop SOA solutions.
> >
> >
Simon,
you are right, I haven't submitted the abstract, so please do,
and thanks for stepping in.
Kelvin.
On 18/10/2007, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/18/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
I'm looking through the mounting number of JIRAs in SDO Java and hope
to knock a few down. It would be good to get another release in plan.
What do people want in it? I'm going to be doing a full pass through
the open JIRAs in the near term and flag up my own priorities.
Regards, Kelvin.
--
> Also, I'd like to nominate Raymond to be release manager for this.
+1
>
>...ant
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael,
good to have you on board, Welcome!
Kelvin.
On 24/10/2007, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Michael to become a
> Tuscany committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
> I look forward to your continued excellent contributio
Welcome Mark!
--
Kelvin
On 01/11/2007, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Mark Combellack to become
> a Tuscany committer.
>
> Congratulations and welcome Mark!
>
>...ant
>
-
It looks fine from my perspective.
Kelvin.
On 09/11/2007, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have added couple more things there too... it would be great if
> others could review and update by EOD today, then I'd move this to the
> Incubator wiki at night.
>
> On Nov 9, 2007 4:56 AM,
Thanks,
I'm looking at your triple JIRA patch now (1812,30,32)
Kelvin.
On 13/11/2007, Ron Gavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take a look and get back to you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Ron
>
> - Original Message
> From: Kelvin Goodson (JIRA)
If you are discounting using XSD for the source of metadata to
describe the SDO types then there is the SDO API provided for dynamic
metadata creation. The sample at [1] gives an introduction to this.
The paper at [2] discusses the subject also, and the program
underlying the discussion in the pap
.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/tools-test/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sdo/test/GenPatternsTestCase.java?view=markup
On 17/11/2007, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > If you are discounting using XSD for the source of meta
, e.g. serialization, copying, and I'm sure lots more.
Kelvin.
On 17/11/2007, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > If you are discounting using XSD for the source of metadata to
> > describe the SDO types then there is the SDO API pr
What should we be concentrating our efforts on in SDO Java. I posted
a while back to suggest we think about the content of a next release.
We've had a few fixes go in recently, but I'd like to see more
consideration of release content before we crank the handle. It would
be great to see a balanc
rchitecture for
> SDO, I can take a look.
>
> The classloading hierarchy that is causing the problem in SDO is the same as
> the one we had with SCA, but unless I understand the classloading in SDO, I
> can't be sure if we can adopt a similar solution as the one used now in SCA.
&g
e.com/eclipse/forums/m92012651.html
On 21/11/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rajini,
> Many thanks for your offer of help here!. We don't have
> documentation on this, but I hope as a community we can develop it.
> I have created a page in the wiki to begin
Hi Amita,
thanks for this. I have just a couple of comments. I think we
should introduce a constant in the Tuscany API to represent UNBOUNDED,
rather than using -1. There's also the case of the cardinality of
global properties, which is said to be UNSPECIFIED, and returns -2
from our implemen
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kelvin,
>
> I have some free cycles, so I'd like to help knock some things off
> this list for you. I've gone ahead and contributed a patch for 1483.
> I'll address 1545 as well. I believe that 1384 is already done.
>
> On Nov 20, 20
er/field=components&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=updated&sorter/order=DESC
On 29/11/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David,
>thanks for the fixes. I'll apply them as soon as I can get to
> them. I've been away unwell for most of t
Hi Amita,
thanks for looking at this. I'm a bit surprised, on digging a little way
in, that the enumeration Property is isMany==false. I'll dig a bit
further, but I had expected to be able to find the Property named
enumeration and get a list of entries.
Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, Amita Vadhavk
Amita,
It feels like option 1 is the easy way to do things, and option 2 is the
right way given the introduction of instance properties on metadata provided
for this purpose (but doesn't currently work).
Here's the results of my digging around. Let's start with what I found last
since it might p
It occurred to me that there's a bit of a knack to debugging into EMF code,
so I just wrote an FAQ to describe how to do this. Comments are welcome on
its clarity or accuracy.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Amita,
>
> It fee
By the way, until the wiki has been used to update the websitre then the FAQ
can be seen at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Tuscany+SDO+Java+-+FAQ
Kelvin.
On 12/12/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It occurred to me that there's a bit of a k
eProperties() can remain unchanged.
>
> With the above change in DataObjectUtil.getMetaObjectInstanceProperty(),
> we
> can add a new method in SDOUtil -
>
> public static List getEnumerationFacet(Type type) {
>Property enumProperty = getInstanceProperty(type, "enu
e list in the new year after
> I
> take a more detailed look.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On 12/10/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd kind of hoped to be in a position to have a release before the end
>
that's a big gap. I guess its not so obvious because of the java reflection
that's used to get to the methods in question. If you could go some way to
fill in the gap that would be great.
Kelvin.
On 19/12/2007, David Adcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The unit test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo
Hi,
I have inspected the two svn version of the sdo files you reference,
and both are as I would expect; no inserted script tags etc. I have
created md5 sum CRC digests of the files. If you could repeat these checks
and verify you get the same answer then I think your virus checker is
repo
s wouldn't seem
to be the whole answer, since others of the files are under the "src"
hierarchy.
Kelvin.
On 20/12/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>I have inspected the two svn version of the sdo files you reference,
> and both are a
reUtil.createFromString
> ((EDataType)dataType,
> literal);
> and assumed that DataObjectUtil.getGlobalProperty() checks for enum and
> does
> SDOUtil.createOpenContentProperty() for Strings.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Regards,
> Amita
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 4:10 PM, kelvin goodso
e list in the new year after
> I
> take a more detailed look.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On 12/10/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd kind of hoped to be in a position to have a release before the en
est to apply the patch which enables SDO to run under
> Equinox without modifying EMF, and with Felix with modified EMF jars. If
> there is a wider interest in running SDO under Felix, an alternative may
> be
> needed. Redistributing EMF with SDO with different manifest entries
> do
r().getOpenContentProperty(uri, name);
> > if (property == null)
> > {
> > property = SDOUtil.createOpenContentProperty(hc, uri, name,
> > ((ModelFactoryImpl)ModelFactory.INSTANCE).getString());
> > }
> > }
> > return property;
Amita, that sounds great thanks. It would be good to have more people
understanding this stuff. I'm happy with javajet setup to help if you need
it. There's an FAQ in the SDO Java part of the website for getting started
that you may have already found.
Kelvin.
On 11/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <
e the dependency of EMF on the Eclipse runtime.
>
> You could apply the patch as is, and remove the code that modifies the
> manifest entries in the EMF jars when the issue is resolved.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On 1/9/08, kelvin goodson &
lvin.
On 20/11/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What should we be concentrating our efforts on in SDO Java. I posted
> a while back to suggest we think about the content of a next release.
> We've had a few fixes go in recently, but I'd like to see mor
namic tests as static tests
>
> Is anybody working on any from the above list? Also please take a look at
> the cwiki link above to see if any other JIRAs from
> there are of interest and can be made part of the release. Any other
> issues/features missed so far in above which can
On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and
> keeping
> ref. to the
> old mail thread -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg27168.html.
> I am starting a new thread now.
>
> Web Site documen
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
't think we would be doing a Web-app
distribution; instead there would be a web-app maven plugin to
package a war with a suitably configured war inside it. See 7) for that.
>> 6) Sample applications
>>Technology sample framework (subject of another mail)
>> BigBank application if ready
7) Tools
Web-app maven plugin 9/4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
Thanks for you thoughts, corrections and insights :-)
Robbie
--
* * * Charlie * * *
Check out some pics of little Charlie at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/
* * * Addresss * * *
1914 Overland Drive
Chapel Hill
NC 27517
* * * Number * * *
919-225-1553
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
administration steps yet to do here to give extended JIRA
privileges and the like?
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
ands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
bs.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Best Regards
Kelvin Goodson
101 - 200 of 1127 matches
Mail list logo
