On 02/06/10 21:10, Steve Romanow wrote:
> On 6/2/2010 3:00 PM, u2-users-requ...@listserver.u2ug.org wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 06:45:43 -0700
>> From: "Boydell, Stuart"
>> To: U2 Users List
>> Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ PA Compare
>> Message-ID:
>> <7ee7790a950e094399b01520071826a20106b48d6...@
Actually, it predates the PC product. It was written (iirc) for
50-series INFORMATION, and that was the version we first had.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stu Glancy
Sent: 11 May 2004 14:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Does !SETPTR (or !SET.PTR - can't remember) do what you want?
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Leckie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2007 09:55
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Getting current SETPTR values
Is there a way to get the values reported
Quite likely - it's "Patch Tuesday", the second Tuesday of the month,
when MS releases a month's worth of security patches in one hit.
So that'll include XP, W2K if it's still supported, Office, and
everything else. There might not actually be a lot of Vista-specific
stuff in there...
Cheers,
Wol
The OP was worried about a Unix directory not being able to handle the
thousands of jpegs he had.
I can't offer help as to how to store binary in a hashed file (other
than what some other person suggested - convert it to ascii somehow eg
uuencode or whatsit64), but I think you may well be able to
What OS? How much RAM does your server have? Etc etc.
What's the likelihood that the data was on disk when you first ran the query,
and was pulled into the OS cache as a result? Second time round, the OS didn't
bother to access the disk because it was all in cache ...
Especially if your query i
If you can find the IBM Bedfont Lakes website, I'm sure it lists hotels.
And if the hotel is within lurching distance of Heathrow Airport, last I knew
there was a courtesy bus that ran from the Airport (and from the local BR rail
station) approximately every half hour. But the airport itself is
Is it possible your work server is subscribed and you're on the internal
distribution list?
See if you can look at the email header to find out if it's been forwarded from
somewhere.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of doug chan
If you did that, in that order, then the answer's simple. You need to update
the cache AFTER updating HS_FILE_INFO. Can't remember the name of the command,
but it's something like you need to run HS.UPDATE in the same account as
HS_FILE_INFO in order to publish the changes.
Cheers,
Wol
-Or
And an easy way to block that is to remove write access to the dictionary.
Iirc, you can't compile an EVAL if you can't compile an i-type. I believe that
was done for security reasons, but it may simply be that the easy way to code
it was to write a temporary item to the dictionary. Either way,
Just DON'T start a few flame wars over this :-)
I'd actually vehemently disagree with the original suggestion, for several
reasons. The two biggest are:
It introduces an extra variable. Any poor maintenance guy coming along has to
worry about whether it's used elsewhere. This sort of behaviour
Overflowed groups take longer to read, so you want to reduce the number of such
groups. Is the size of this file roughly constant, or does it just slowly grow?
If it's roughly constant, try setting a MINIMUM.MODULO at around 900,000. It'll
hopefully break up a lot of your badly overflowed groups
I must admit I prefer multiple exit points, but I'll throw a third variant into
the mix ...
OK = TRUE
IF OK THEN
Various statements that set OK to false if there's an error
END
IF OK THEN
More statements that set OK to false if there's an error
END
Rinse and repeat
RETURN
Cheers,
Wol
--
I think part of the problem is, because it says MINIMUM.MODULUS, we think of it
as analogous to the modulus of a hashed file. It isn't.
It's more of a hint to the system about how big the file is likely to be, and
how to avoid wasting effort.
So if you're creating a file and intend to load it w
e batches that has been taking up to two hours to complete finished
the other night in under 10 minutes.
Thanks a ton.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:22 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2u
A second, far bigger adjustment (which will account for a lot of the
underestimate), is to divide by 1600, not 2000 or 2048.
A split factor of 80 means that your groups will, at maximum, be 80% full. 80%
of 2048 is 1640 (near enough).
That will give a second-cut (and rather more accurate) estim
Replying again ...
Having looked at the previous email, I notice that the if/else/endif was
originally #if/#else/#endif. Those #'s are important ... ignore my previous
solution and put the #s back.
Oh - and whether UCB is 1 or 0 - do "man setpgrp" and hopefully the answer will
be obvious ...
My C skills are rusty, but I think the two errors are
1) a misplaced curly brace - it's " procedure (args) { body } " so move the
first curly brace between the arguments and the variable declarations.
2) C doesn't have "endif" - get rid of it.
(Oh - and good programming practice - always put yo
It's not quite true that HP-GL/2 is in all HP laser printers...
Although it predates PCL/5, when that came out with the LaserJet III, it was
included as a subset.
So it's not found on LaserJet IIs or Is (anybody still got any?), and it should
also be found any recent laser (or inkjet) that clai
I think IBM's versions officially work on Red Hat. Somewhere along the line one
of the cpio arguments' official meanings has been reversed, and I think RH
hasn't changed.
You're probably right in saying it's the "c" option, which now in most non-RH
distros has exactly the *opposite* effect that
Setting the terminal to 132 chars wide ...
I did that at another site. There's an @(-nn) setting (which you'll probably
have to define yourself - I don't think it's set by default in the files
provided by IBM).
And the TERM command doesn't do anything with it. However, you get the source
for T
Thanks.
It's on UV, but we found the problem. The routine wasn't cataloged! What threw
me was that it worked sometimes, but I'm told that if you call a routine
locally it doesn't always need to be cataloged. So, obviously, sometimes the
call to load the subroutine looked in the right place and
The one problem with SAMPLE and SAMPLED is that, afaik, they are pseudo-random.
Unless your file is volatile, you are likely to get approximately the same
result set every time (or exactly the same result set, if your file hasn't
changed).
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
It's the classic "UV is supported on Red Hat" problem. The install script
doesn't understand the SuSE rc setup.
This all ought to be documented somewhere ... has somebody put a "how to
install on SuSE" FAQ on the u2ug wiki? If not, could someone put one there (I
did it so long ago, I've forgott
PRINT CHAR(7)
I think you can also do PRINT @BELL
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
Sent: 14 February 2008 15:32
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] [UB] Beep Error
How do I send a rudimentay ascii a
I'd use basic.
When I used it (yonks ago) I thought the manual was reasonably clear. The basic
command takes two arguments. The first is the index name, and if that's all you
supply it returns a list of the index values. The second is the index value,
and if you supply that as well it returns a
Ah...
If that's what you want, then in BASIC
SELECTINDEX "STOCK.ID" FROM F.REPAIR
Should have exactly the same effect (and save the overhead of an EXECUTE). The
only difference is the resulting select list may not be sorted (although I
think it is).
If you then want to find what records are t
Firstly, you should NEVER run AV software on a database server. It's known for
causing performance issues. By all means run a scan on the database from a
remote machine via a share ...
And you don't want it installed on the db server, because a lot of these things
have a nasty habit of self-act
And be very careful with 4GLs using named common, as I found out many years ago
with &PACE. It stored filepointers in named common, generating the common name
from the file name.
Fortunately we found the problem when the runtime complained of a redefinition
of common (one routine had the same n
Not that I know much about this error but ...
What version of UV are you running? I've set up ODBC on both 9.6 and 10.2, and
the later version seems to be a lot more robust ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac Bhyat
Sent:
t's a very old version of uv - maybye 9.5 or possibly even 9.4
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 25 Jun 2008 12:41
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] UVODBC Account Activation
N
CTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 25 Jun 2008 16:34
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] UVODBC Account Activation
Okay.
Firstly, do you need this file in your account? Oddly enough, most of my
"hard to fix" problems with ODBC
se they only use SQL Schemas. The
fact you think you're running a very old version also means it may be (probably
is) a fixed problem by now...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 26 June 2008 09:42
To:
I'm having a problem with ODBC ... I found a post about what looks like my
problem on gmane from 3 years ago but it wasn't very helpful ... it just said
"we upgraded our software and it went away" ...
Anyways, the error I'm getting is
ODBC--call failed.
[IBM][UVODBC][1401032]Error ID: 46 Severi
327
SQL_SUCCESS
What's odd is it looks like it's the PC end getting the query wrong before it
sends it, but I've got two files sharing the same physical dictionary file and
one works while the other one doesn't ... which implies a data problem ... cue
headscra
avid
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 12:01 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] RE: ODBC problems
What's odd is it looks like it's the PC end getting the query
I notice you're on nix ...
Is the piece of code that writes invoked via an EXECUTE or PERFORM from the
code that did the original READU?
I wouldn't expect it to on doze, but on Unix that *might* change the execution
environment enough to cause a problem... (grasping at straws to see if it gives
Just be warned - rtf isn't as portable as it's supposed to be. I wrote rtf
files from UV and they would read perfectly okay in some word processors and
not in others.
Oh - and just doing a "read, save" in Word of a file created in UV increased
the file size horrendously ...
There might be some
One of my colleagues brought a speed problem to me - he has two queries which
produce the same result but one (the "proper" "modern" SQL) runs slowly, and
the other (deprecated SQL) runs much faster. He was running them in a web
engine, so I ran them at TCL with the EXPLAIN keyword and got an odd r
the right table.
An index on @ID in each of the tables may help.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Anthony Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org"
> Subject: [U2] Strange SQL query optimisation ...
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:34:
And if you've got to rebuild all the indices on the live server, you might want
to look at recreating them. Not sure what the keyword is, but if you recreate
them as relative indices, it will put the relative path in the file header and
you won't have this problem again ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Or
Thanks.
If I add the no.optimize keyword, it changes all joins to an "outer cartesian
join". So that's even worse ... (I haven't tried actually running it :-)
If a LEFT JOIN and LEFT OUTER JOIN are the same thing, that adds another
little oddity to the mix :-) Why is the optimiser using both t
Sounds like you might not have to do fnuxi at all ...
If your linux is running on x86, you will probably get away with just a copy
and that's that - fnuxi is required if you changed endian-ness on the
processor, not OS.
Why not just make the UV box export a SQL interface?
Point out the fact th
Look on PickWiki - there are several sort routines there.
Of course, I'd recommend the SHELL sort :-)
NB - which version of UV are you using - it's long fixed but there's a nasty
bug in the COMPARE function in 9.6.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
SSL direct from UV, or SSL direct from the UV server ...
If they're sending it to their internal mailserver, which is configured to
require SSL, or they don't have an internal mailserver and must use SSL to talk
out ...
I got the impression they wanted the CLIENT software to talk SSL, Postfix a
The obvious place is for a vendor to add a page to PickWiki, and then any other
vendors add themselves to that ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louie Bergsagel
Sent: 29 July 2008 00:36
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subje
What help exactly do you need? Make sure that the @ID is listed in @SELECT or
whereever (I try to always list it as the very first field). That way, you can
simply JOIN the single-value table to the ASSOCiated table.
And have you seen the article on PickWiki? It's a bit out-of-date but still
us
Man chroot
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Results
Sent: 04 August 2008 14:59
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Linux Psuedo Directory
All,
I'm going blank on this one, all help appreciated. I want to create
a
Don't know about UD, but on UV you can switch on logging that will list all the
commands passed to UV. Only problem is, to describe it as verbose is an
understatement ...
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: 04 Au
I've looked up the notes on our error and found the following
The object invoked has disconnected from its clients (-2147417848)
I don't know where that came from but it's the same error that you've got, and
I guess we found that somewhere in some documentation on OLE or whatever. So
what is ha
I'm trying to select a string that contains a single-quote, using the LIKE
operator. It works fine with EQ.
So if I do a " SELECT FILE WITH FIELD EQ "LLOYD'S" ", the select returns
exactly what I expect.
But if I do a " SELECT FILE WITH FIELD LIKE ..."LLOYD'S"... " it returns
pretty much the enti
Relational theory requires you to abstract the database to fit a (badly flawed)
prescriptive theory of what data *should* be like. MV simply models the
database to look like the real world.
Relational scatters the data about individual real-world items across multiple
tables. MV (properly desig
Rather than writing a simple program ...
SELECT PARTS WITH EVAL "DCOUNT(F1, '"') GT 0"
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Israel, John R.
Sent: 12 August 2008 21:59
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] RE: TCL literal
Ooops ...
COUNT, not DCOUNT
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: 13 August 2008 12:01
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: [U2] RE: TCL literal select
Rather than writing a simple program .
I think you're muddling dynamic and dimensioned arrays - a dynamic array can't
have an element 0 :-)
Sounds like somebody, when writing jBase, saw the "feature" of <-1> and thought
they'd be clever with <0>.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Going down the linux route ...
IBM support RedHat, so look at RHEL or CentOS.
My choice would be Slackware or gentoo - not because they're better or worse
distros, but because you learn a lot more dealing with their oddities. Slack is
very BSD-oriented (or was), but is also very minimalist in i
Yes, that would be nice BUT!
Ordinary members would be observers, and that's quite difficult to enforce on a
conference call.
What would be best if the call could be streamed so that anyone could listen
in, but (unless it's changed) the calls are courtesy of IBM on IBM's equipment,
and I don't
IBM are doing you a favour letting you have PE (yes, I know it's in their
interests too :-)
One of the conditions of letting you have it is that you stay bleeding edge.
The way they enforce that (and also keep track of who's using PE) is to
date-bomb the PE version. So re-installing won't work.
I looked at that SQL and thought "what's wrong with double quotes?" (but then I
don't know SQL that well). I thought quoting field names was mandatory if they
contained spaces and optional otherwise. Or should it be single quotes and
double is the problem?
I'm still having problems with the dou
ASSOC MY_SELECTED_TABLE
It does conform to SQL...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:14 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Crystal Reports and UniData
I looked
] Crystal Reports and UniData
Usually, the AS keyword is in use...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:18 AM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Crystal R
Which *ix? A philosophy (which I tend heartily to agree with) is "if it ain't
broke, don't fix it". Unfortunately, that also often leads to vendors saying
"it works for everyone else, why do you need it changed?".
Wonder what the limit is on RHEL? That's an *ux rather than an *ix so it
*should*
Closing a file apparently releases all the locks. There's an implied close in
read_prog, therefore the lock gets released.
To fix it, you need to remove the OPEN in read_prog, either by opening the file
in COMMON or passing the file pointer as an argument.
Yup, I agree that behaviour *might* be
Bear in mind that ODBC is relational is set-oriented. There is NO CONCEPT
WHATSOEVER of "order" in sets, therefore if stuff comes out correctly ordered
it *must* *be*, *by* *definition*, down to pure chance (or an accident of
implementation).
If you want to guarantee it, you need to add an extr
There is, unfortunately, a question of "market power" here.
If Access and SQL-Server talk to each other, even if they use a *broken*
version of SQL to do so, the market place will expect other databases and
clients to talk the same - BROKEN - dialect of SQL.
It's all very well a vendor (like IB
Point 6 ...
I know you think that c:\ibm is nasty, but be aware that (I think it's UV
itself) does NOT like spaces in pathnames. I always accept the defaults, I've
had some weird problems installing in Program Files, the space means various
services fail to start.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Me
Mind you, AS ALWAYS :-), they were only coping someone else!
Ever wondered why "\" is the path delimiter in Windows? Because when Gary
Kildall wrote CP/M he used "/" as a valid character in a file name... (Okay,
Unix wasn't so ubiquitous in those days.)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
F
But IF you can update VOC, you CAN bypass remote voc, which is what David said!
As part of your security you need to make sure that users CAN'T update VOC
(which is rather harder than it seems at first glance).
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
It's probably AIX that's doing the caching. If it's like linux, there's no way
to tell it - it will just aggressively cache everything until it runs out of
spare RAM.
Question is, why do you want these files in RAM? UV is very fast at retrieving
from disk so what's the reason?
And it sounds li
Owww
Firstly I doubt the trigger on one system will spot changes made by the other
system.
But, rather more seriously, we have had UV file corruption which was laid
pretty conclusively down to two systems accessing the same dynamic file - oh
and one of them, allegedly, only had read access
Unfortunately, it's obviously doing a numeric equality (which I believe is the
default if it can).
What happens if you add "AND F1 MATCHES 6N"?
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David A. Green
Sent: 04 November 2008 03:10
To: u
Is this the DIRECTORY keyword?
(Be careful, in PI this meant create a type 1 file, so it might be a bit
temperamental to get working.)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Dodds
Sent: 12 November 2008 16:07
To: u2-users@listse
Looking at this, a couple of ideas ...
Is UV supported on SuSE? Last I knew (probably out of date :-) it was only
supported on RHEL.
Catdir looks to be a type 1 file - can you change it to a type 19? What
are/were the permissions on the *client*SCRNHD directory? Do you only get this
problem wh
The other problem with counting backwards is if you've got a lot of fields.
BASIC has optimisations for scanning forward through a list. I don't think it
scans backwards very well. Go backwards and the result is not likely to be
pretty.
The only time I normally go backwards is when I have a hab
If you're going to do it that way, I wouldn't bother with putting the @VMs back
(or may the @SM's too, depending on what you're doing.
Get CUST.NUM and CUST.DESC from your modified IN.LINE as follows ...
CUST.NUM = FIELD( IN.LINE, CHAR(9), 1, 1)
CUST.DESC = FIELD( IN.LINE, CHAR(9), 1, 1)
Cheers
Several things look a bit wonky to me here.
Firstly I'd get rid of the first three lines with
CMD = "COUNT ":FILENAME
Then the routine as shown here leaves a hanging select list - NOT a good idea
when the next person comes along and doesn't realise it.
I've never used it, but isn't there a form
Which version of UV?
Triggers have only recently worked on UV files. They used to only work on
SQL-ized files.
If you're not using SQL and haven't upgraded recently you may be on a version
that's too old to support them. (And is HTTEST a type 1/19? No triggers on them
...)
Cheers,
Wol
-O
Does the common contain dimensioned arrays? Quite likely, I would have thought.
And that would be why you need OPTIONS PICK. Ideal-flavour UV uses PI-style
arrays which have an element (0). Pick-style arrays don't. I think there may
also be something to do with how many entries in the common tab
I asked IBM a similar question ...
The client tools are certified at the same level as the server, so if the
server is certified to run on Vista, so will the tools.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: 04 Decembe
Nothing since the twelfth of May!?!?
Mind you, it has been a bit quiet these last few days :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Richardson
Sent: 10 December 2008 12:48
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] test -
The 20-somethings probably do WORSE than us. For most of them, if they haven't
got a wizard to do it for them, they can't do it. They don't actually
UNDERSTAND what they're doing most of the time.
(I hope I'm not maligning them, but I often feel, when trying to help users,
that "tech support" i
If you're on Windows it *shouldn't* (famous last words) make any difference. I
never worry about correct case (though I do try and keep it the same as what
Windows says...).
Windows is "case insensitive but case preserving" so the case of the pathname
shouldn't make any difference whatsoever. I
You'll have to check the functions that return file information about a file
pointer. I'm sure there's some way of doing it.
It would be nice if IBM could fix that - it always used to work in INFOBASIC,
you would have thought that a logic test could at least return true/false
instead of crashin
The VOC doesn't need to be small (ever since my PI days, I've always had VOC as
dynamic when it's been up to me), but files don't hash very well if they have a
large standard deviation in record size. VOC contains a lot of very small
records, so if you add a lot of very large records (Paragraphs
There's an easier SELECT than that
SELECT VOC WITH TYPE EQ 'F'
TYPE is a predefined i-descriptor in DICT VOC.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jef Lee
Sent: 27 January 2009 07:48
To: u2-user
To authenticate linux against Active Directory, look into PAM (pluggable
authentication modules).
Just be careful - if you break PAM and don't have a backup, you then can't log
in to your linux box!
I can't give any advice about PAM, my only attempt to use it failed, but I know
that's how you'
If I indexed @ID, I would always include nulls in the index. Two reasons:
1) There should never be a null @ID
2) The reason you shouldn't index nulls is because you may have many records
with a null value, so you will end up with a huge record in your index. Bad...
But with @ID you'll only have
My idea would be to:
Create a field in the CLIENT file that contains a list of all users that can
see that client.
Create an i-descriptor in the file that you're reporting on that pulls that
field across.
Use a WHEN or WITH (can never remember which) to only pick records where that
user's id
And the docu says absolutely nothing about troubleshooting :(
I'm experimenting with replication - trying to set up a hot-standby scenario.
So I've gone to my primary, enabled replication, and published the account I'm
interested in. Fine, it comes up as everything (about 53 files) published.
Go
Everybody's been jumping in saying what the tool is. What they haven't said is
"do you need it" because it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with a port from AIX
to linux, and everything to do with the hardware.
I presume you're going from RS/6000 (or similar) to Intel? In that case you do
need the
Replication is giving me grief ...
I've found the programs in APP.PROGS (which seem so much more usable than
UvAdmin :) bit I'm getting nowhere. Looking at the files in the UV account it
seems okay but I'm not at all sure. I *think* it's all configured "about
right", but I'm getting "UDR initializ
inistrator Program "*vmadmsub": pc = 94a0,
Message[02]
This lot is in our errlog, *vmadmsub looks suspiciously like a system routine,
and message 02 is "Bad file descriptor"
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-u
Have William Hill dropped UniVerse now?
They used it as the back end to their on-line betting, I believe. If
they're still using it, they're a good site to quote as they are one of
the big UK bookmakers.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Charles Barouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Reynolds & Reynolds?
Look on the u2ug web site - you might find the story there. They spent
MILLIONS converting their product to SQL-Server, and the SQL version
floated about as well as a lead balloon. They ended up scrapping it.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Mark Eastwood [mailto
wIntegrate certainly has this.
We had a mix of Wyse50s, the odd PT250, and wIntegrate configured as a
PT250. As the user logged in, LOGIN printed "esc " to the screen
(at least, I think that's what it was) and read the response. That way,
we (usually) didn't have users asking us "is this a Wyse or
When you installed your previous version of wIntegrate, did someone
customise it for you?
I don't remember it as being able to handle a 80/132 switch - on our
system I had to code the switching escape sequences into pt250.wis
myself, and I also had to edit the PTERM code so it used those
sequences
I'm trying to get a working Gentoo at home. That's a game and a half :-)
When I succeed I'll likely try and create an ebuild to install UVPE. Be
nice to get that officially into portage :-)
(I want to get a WordPerfect 8 ebuild working, too :-)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Brutz
If it's a *nix box, just fire up a bash shell, and enter the command
"uv".
(That's for UniVerse, of course. YMMV for UD.)
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: Dave Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 May 2007 07:14
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] A couple of que
Well, when I read that comment about READNEXT having to return file as
well as key - actually it *already* returns a lot more than just key -
try doing a SELECT WHEN.
I guess partfiles would be easier - the problem with partfiles (and I
hit this in my last job) is that the database must be able to
I don't think you can just read the file sequentially ... you can't do
it in BASIC, therefore you can't do it with InterCall.
In BASIC you do a SELECT, then a READNEXT, then a READ. You should be
able to do exactly the same with InterCall.
Cheers,
Wol
-Original Message-
From: pam [mailto
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
