uimaj-tools has in src/main/resources in
org/apache/uima/tools/util/gui/ a file "about.txt, with the content:
Apache UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) SDK
Version ${version}-incubating
http://incubator.apache.org/uima
Copyright 2006, 2007 The Apache Software Foundation
D etc.) in org.apache.uima.tools.util.gui.AboutDialog. Please do not
remove ;-)
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
uimaj-tools has in src/main/resources in
org/apache/uima/tools/util/gui/ a file "about.txt, with the content:
Apache UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) SDK
Version ${version}-
Please review and fix / augment as needed :-) Wiki is:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2007
-Marshall
I poked around in the code for TypeSystemImpl a bit and concluded:
1) Re: The Array of arbitrary FSs mechanism, which is implemented to
allow adding additional arrays of specific FS types after the type
system has been committed. The call which actually adds a type is
ts.getArrayType(componen
There was a (in)famous incident where the implementation for rerunning
the Semantic Index Builder did the same thing - it (formerly) erased all
the files in the target directory.
What happened was a senior level manager (Dave Ferrucci) was just trying
out this code, he was busy and didn't read
ceIt.get());
currentLen = 0;
for (tokenIt.moveToFirst(); tokenIt.isValid(); tokenIt.moveToNext()) {
++currentLen;
}
maxLen = ((maxLen < currentLen) ? currentLen : maxLen);
}
System.out.println("Longest sentence contains " + maxLen + " tokens.
tty sure I've documented this before. I don't know
where that text went. Maybe I dreamed it.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo - is this "fixable" - so it just works as users expect?
-Marshall
Original Message
Subject: Re: Iterators: problem
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Is it just me, or is the following from section 1.1 of the Tutorial and Guide
out of context:
Note
In Eclipse 3.1, if you highlight a UIMA class or method defined in the UIMA SDK
JavaDocs, you can
conveniently have Eclipse open the corresponding JavaDoc for that class or
m
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/12/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's unclear about this method?
You can get a Type object that represents a typed-array, but there is
no way to create an instance of such an array. What good is it then
to get the Type o
I'm going to try and make a test case to see if I can duplicate Greg's
slowdowns. If anyone has beaten me to it, please let me know right away ;-)
-Marshall
add to
the vm args something like -Xmx384m)). If it works for you, please see
if you can isolate what's different in your failing case verses this
artificial test.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm going to try and make a test case to see if I can duplicate Greg's
slowdowns.
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to use LGPL icons in the Cas Editor ?
I don't think so. This is because downloaders of things from Apache
expect to be free of "obligations" when they
do things with what they downloaded.
See http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html. This lists
Those arguments sound convincing to me. I guess I would only prefer the
docs were less mysterious,
and in addition to saying "not to mix the two styles", they would
state the reasons, as you have here :-)
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
It seems to m
Michael Baessler wrote:
As far as I know is System.nanoTime() a Java 5 feature and is not
available in Java 1.4.
So do we still want to be Java 1.4 compatible?
I think we want the framework to be 1.4 compatible. It's probably less
a requirement for the
test cases :-), but I take your point -
In addition to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-500 which
reduces lock contention,
there are some other changes needed.
TypeSystemImpl is not thread safe, but is used by many threads.
Because it has the property that it is "updated" by one thread, and then
is read-only by all threads,
Michael Baessler wrote:
What do you mean by
"we can add a remoteAE if and only if, the AE is already deployed
on the remote machine"
do you use the ComponentDescriptorEditor (CDE) plugin to do that?
In this case, the CDE has to retrieve the meta data of the deployed AE
to get for example
+1 I don't know of any use of the 2nd way, but I may be just
un-informed ;-) Lev Kozakov may know something about this.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
When looking at the InstallationController code I see some old method,
where I think they are never used.
The InstallationController
Good points - I'll keep both versions from now on. I was trying to
clean up Jira
a bit to see if we had any remaining issues that needed attention in
this release.
There are some which I didn't know anything about - so I left as affects
2.1 (only).
These are mostly things Thilo and Adam migh
Good point. I'm choosing to deferring this until after 2.2 is out to
avoid having to retest...
-Marshall
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513246 ]
Adam Lally commented
been fixed :-)
please update Jira.
Then, take a look at the test plan and see if you think we're ready to
vote
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Good points - I'll keep both versions from now on. I was trying to
clean up Jira
a bit to see if we had any remaining issues that need
ill help the eclipse platform to enforce that the plugin is is
run as we tested it.
Jörn
On Jul 17, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Sc
last post was not clear: I spoke about the Eclipse Plugin
specifically.
Benjamin
Marshall Schor
<[EMAIL P
ion? Something where
we can check what level of Eclipse the user has and issue an error if it's
too low? I think we've discussed this before, we could check for EMF at the
same time. That would be very helpful, both to us and our users.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
I think these TODOs came over from the original Velocity project.
+1 to delete. These are not TODOs for our use, I think.
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Do we need this file? Some TODOs seem out of date,
for the others we could maybe open Jira issues?
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
As you may have noticed, I tagged a first release candidate
earlier today. Subsequently, RAT found a number of issue.
These are the remaining ones. As soon as these are resolved,
I'll build another release candidate.
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
RAT complains about these:
Oops -
They're already *not* in SVN.
So they shouldn't be in our source distribution. If they are, we can
fix the assembly build step.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
[...]
These files all are "genera
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
[...]
These files all are "generated" by Docbook, so can't have a license.
!?
uimaj-2.2.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/titlepage/titlepage-html.xsl
!?
uimaj-2.2.0-incubating/ui
Schor wrote:
Oops -
They're already *not* in SVN.
So they shouldn't be in our source distribution. If they are, we can
fix the assembly build step.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
[...]
These files all are
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
I see Marshall has fixed the RAT issues reported by Thilo and the JIRA
bug tracking system says that we have no open issues to fix for uimaj
2.2.
So it seems that we are ready to build the hopefully latest release
candidate level.
+1
But what do we do with all
I'm no expert - but in the code fragment below - it looks like for
windows, the browser launcher is not a browser, but
rather just one of the command shell windows?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
when testing the annotation viewer some misconfiguration came up.
The annotation viewer
Some history: Debian (a Linux distributor) has a legal issue with
Mozilla (and Firefox), around
trademarks; google this or see http://lwn.net/Articles/118268/
The issues appear to involve firefox as well. Debian's browser is named
Iceweasel.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
when tes
Some useful leads:
http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2006/101106-portland-project.html describes
xdg-utils, and says Fedora, OpenSUSE, and Debian have already committed
to installing the utilities.
One utility enables visiting a Web page in the user's chosen browser.
On Debian, this capability is
Michael Baessler wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
When checking through the Resolved issues assigned to me I noticed
that one of them was the addition of jars containing our source code,
as part of our binary release. I must have missed that when it went
in.
The current uimaj-2.2.0-03 does not contain
] PEAR API
does not delete the PEAR ID subdirectory before the new content is
installed - ASF JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-307 : [#UIMA-307] Fix CVD
screenshots - ASF JIRA
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
I see Marshall has fixed the RAT issues
Thanks, Michael; nice job :-)
I'm going to update the documentation to describe in the same sections
(where you
took out info about how to attach the source) similar
sections on how to attach the javadocs which are included in the binary
distribution.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Mich
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/26/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So should be add the source jars to the source release?
I don't think that is the normal Apache thing to do. On
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html it defines
source release as "a simple export fr
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
I played around with the CasEditor and tried to add a cas processor,
but unfortunately without success. I was able to add the cas
processor (annotator) to my project and I found the place in the
context menu to run it, but I ever get ClassNotFound exceptions...
what is t
In our release notes, the last section is cut/pasted from the release
note generation done by Jira. We could replace that with a
link to the Jira system to (re)generate on demand the release notes.
The link would be, for instance for 2.2:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?ver
Except for needing to rerun the release note generation, I'm +1 ! for
doing the 2.2 release.
Thilo - if you agree, can you call for an official vote?
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
-1 to this change. What exactly is the concern here?
My main concern is what I originally said: "Don't some companies have
issues with their people downloading source code?"
Does that concern a large corporation that some of us work
for, or
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
On 7/30/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
How hard is it to create the source jars from the UIMA source distribution?
Not hard *if* you have our build env. set up (i.e., maven etc).
I'm sort
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/30/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
-1 to this change. What exactly is the concern here?
My main concern is what I originally said: "Don't some companies have
issues with their people downloading
Running org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest
testTree(org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest) Time elapsed:
0.16 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
at
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError.(AssertionFailedError.java:11)
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.
Adam Lally wrote:
Actually I was thinking of something perhaps even easier for the user.
What I meant was that the script would automatically add the source
files directly into the jar files in the UIMA binary distribution. So
no action would be necessary at all in Eclipse.
(To locate the bina
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
message bundles, etc.).
The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
this step. Just the source files need
to jdk.
-Marshall
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Running org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest
testTree(org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest) Time elapsed:
0.16 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
at
junit.f
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/1/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
we need to do?
OK with me to close it.
We should update the docume
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
attach javadocs, to now also mention
running those scripts to attach the source.
Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/3/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we're finally ready ;-) I cut RC3 this morning,
found a minor issue with RAT and did RC4. Next time I'll
run RAT before tagging the release...
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/6/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I built a new release candidate with Adam's and Marshall's fixes
in. It's available as usual at on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5. Let's try a new vote
later today or tomorro
Marshall Schor wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/6/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I built a new release candidate with Adam's and Marshall's fixes
in. It's available as usual at on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I built a new release candidate with Adam's and Marshall's fixes
in. It's available as usual at on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5. Let's try a new vote
later today or tomorrow.
+1 to doing a new vote :-) -Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Ok, here we go. This build passes our regression test
suite, as well as Adam's test scripts. Michael and I
also ran some manual sanity checks. RAT report looks
good, too.
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5
So pleas
Adam Lally wrote:
As I recall we had a couple of user requests for us to publish our
jars as Maven artifacts in the Apache incubator repository. And I
think I got our Maven metadata into shape during the 2.1.0 release
process after some comments from Dan Kulp on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
So s
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it's time to move to Java 1.5 after this
release. While there are still people out there who use
Java 1.4, their numbers are shrinking rapidly. I'm guessing
that by the time we do our next release, the need for
Java 1.4 compatibility will have gone.
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/7/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maven automatically generates "sources" jar files (check your local
Maven repository). Unfortunately these don't have the DISCLAIMER,
LICENSE, NOTICES. I will see if I can figure out how to get those to
be added.
I'v
In the uimaj project's pom, the element points to itself. Why
is this done, and
where is the documentation in Maven which describes what this means?
Also, there are two elements defining the javadoc plugin - is this
intentional, or should/can
these be merged?
If we are heading toward puttin
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the uimaj project's pom, the element points to itself.
I don't see any element in the uimaj project's pom.
right - my oops - I was looking at the uimaj-distr pom, not the uimaj pom.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
various release candidate tags under it. For 2.1.0, we
didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized. Anybody mind
if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
2.1 tags under it? It's not going to affect
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/8/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, that would be good. I'm currently building a new level, I'll
create the maven artifacts manually for this one.
I'm actually having some trouble at the moment... For one thing mvn
repository:bundle-create fails
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've found some places in Apache docs where it seems to be true that the
Maven artifacts themselves,
do need to be signed. One of these is the ref to releasing "Struts",
found here:
http://strut
I read through the info referenced in the note below from Incubator General.
[1] http://www.nabble.com/-POLL--Incubator-Maven-Repository-
tf3699415.html#a10344861
[2] http://www.nabble.com/Maven-2-repo-for-incubating-project-
releases--tf2008291.html#a5517073
Both of these raised questions
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
I read through the info referenced in the note below from Incubator
General.
[1] http://www.nabble.com/-POLL--Incubator-Maven-Repository-
tf3699415.html#a10344861
[2] http://www.nabble.com/Maven-2-repo-for-incubating-project-
releases
Adam Lally wrote:
Hm, it doesn't look like that's possible. Seems like a missing API
feature. If you need it, please open a JIRA issue.
I think it's possible only through the low-level TypeSystem API:
LowLevelTypeSystem lts = aTypeSystem.getLowLevelTypeSystem();
return lts.ll_g
Thilo Goetz wrote:
We've had a few days to do regression testing
on this level, and nothing new has come up.
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC8
So please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 Release RC8 as uimaj-2.2.0-incubating, it's ready
[ ] -1 D
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
We've had a few days to do regression testing
on this level, and nothing new has come up.
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC8
So please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 Release RC8 as uimaj-
oward redoing
the release (sorry!) if we want to keep the release notes "hard-coded"
in our
distribution.
But if everyone else feels this is just too trivial to re-do the
release, I'll go along :-)
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
We've had a fe
+1 to put this one out, then, from me . -Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't feel very strongly one way or another about this, but lean
toward redoing
the release (sorry!) if we want to keep the release notes "ha
1) Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray whose element type is Baz
Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray whose element type is NotBaz
(Should throw an exception?)
2) Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray, whose element type is Baz
Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray
I think this thread was never responded to - can we discuss now? or am I
mistaken?
-Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
I got a user request for an unambiguous, filtered iterator that
filters first, then applies the unambiguousness constraint. (An
unambiguous iterator is one where the next annotation
Michael Baessler wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
To support some advanced users of UIMA, we have been working on an
alternative general scalability mechanism for UIMA analytics. Our
goals were to provide a standards-based, much more flexible and
powerful capability than that offered by the UIMA coll
Range Type restriction, the other
doesn't specify.
I'm making this throw an exception, per the logic for #2 below in
Thilo's note.
-Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Type Foo, feature Bar - range type FSArray whose element typ
Michael Baessler wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
does the UIMA framework has a method to evaluate a feature path as
String value?
-- Michael
No response... does this mean, there is no such method or nobody have
read this?
I missed reading this message...
By feature path - do you mea
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi Marshall,
Marshall Schor wrote:
OK. Am implementing tests and then the fixes :-)
please don't commit anything to trunk until we're done
with this release. Else we might have to branch now,
and I'd like to avoid that if we can.
oops - sorry -
I think all the committers have voted +1... Can we declare the vote
closed and go to the incubator at this point?
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
We've had a few days to do regression testing
on this level, and nothing new has come up.
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home
Saw another post (may be outdated) that said Continuum didn't handle
"flat" Maven
structures, only the "nested" ones - and we're using the "flat" approach
I think.
-Marshall (hoping to get to continuous integration at some point :-)
Marshall Schor wr
ttp://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/uimaasdoc.html>
link (if you don't see it, please hit refresh in your browser).
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
To support some advanced users of UIMA, we have been working on an
alternative general scalability mechani
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi Marshall,
Marshall Schor wrote:
OK. Am implementing tests and then the fixes :-)
please don't commit anything to trunk until we're done
with this release. Else we might have to branc
2 down the page.
A quick look at Apache projects - I could only find one that was using
CI (Harmony).
Still don't have any definite opinions, myself...
-Marshall
Jörn
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
Saw another post (may be outdated) that said Continuum didn&#x
UIMA is currently not classified as 5D002 software
(a classification for software, requiring "notification" due to issues
around crypto).
To keep this status, we have to
a) avoid including any 5D002 software in any distribution we do, and
b) avoid using interfaces for 5D002 components (that
When I tried to add Mylin to my Eclipse (3.3), it presented me with a menu
of features including "connectors" for Bugzilla and for Trac, but I
didn't see one for Jira.
If there is one, where is it (url to update site)?
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Sorry, Michael I use
Found this via google:
Eclipse artifacts for 3.3 are in this repository:
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/
See:
http://osdir.com/ml/ide.eclipse.equinox.devel/2006-12/msg00012.html
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
I can, but the eclipse 3.3 plugins are not in the central
Is there any reason why we don't factor some common POM elements to the
parent?
Some candidates:
(except for eclipse plugins which use the "period" separator
before "incubating")
-Marshall
I've succeeded in getting maven to build the eclipse update site. Here
are some particulars, in case anyone wants to suggest improvements
before I commit things.
First, I did two features. One is just the runtime plugin. This is for
those projects which want to package something as an RCP (
to the repository icon... and nothing works.
Thanks for any suggestions...
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
When I tried to add Mylin to my Eclipse (3.3), it presented me with a menu
of features including "connectors" for Bugzilla and for Trac, but I
didn't
.
-- Michael
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Maybe I don't know how to look, but although some 3.3
stuff is there, most things are missing. This is where
we get our 3.2 and 3.1 stuff from...
Marshall Schor wrote:
Found this via google:
Eclipse artifacts for 3.3 are in this repository:
http://
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
How should we go on with this issue?
Does anyone know if these packages will go into the maven repository
in the future?
Is there a place to request these changes, so that the packages are
added to the maven repository?
If not we have to change the build, so that we use
repository
- how to create an Eclipse RCP Target in maven
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
How should we go on with this issue?
Does anyone know if these packages will go into the maven repository
in the future?
Is there a place to request these changes, so that the
Marshall Schor wrote:
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
How should we go on with this issue?
Does anyone know if these packages will go into the maven repository
in the future?
Is there a place to request these changes, so that the packages are
added to the maven repository?
If not we have to change
I like this idea. I think there are some details to work out.
Most of these are maybe just things I need to learn :-) Here's a few:
1) Whatever approach we take for this - it would be nice to align with
existing Eclipse support for this kind of thing (I assume there is some,
but I
haven't explo
s available.
>>
>> -- Michael
>>
>> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>> Maybe I don't know how to look, but although some 3.3
>>> stuff is there, most things are missing. This is where
>>> we get our 3.2 and 3.1 stuff from...
>>>
>>> Mar
Hi Michael -
Just took a look. I like the idea of a quick-start.
It seems there are two themes in this article - maybe they would be
better if separated. One is more a "why UIMA" story,
and the other is how to install and get started.
My sense is that people prefer shorter, targeted pages, and
Oops, now I know why "deepEquals()" wasn't familiar... I didn't realize
it was a Java 5 thing...
This one's not critical - so I would lean toward putting it back to just
plain equals.
Opinions? -Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Author: schor
>> Date: Thu Aug 23 0
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> is it possible to define subtypes of lists and array types in uima ?
>>
>>
>
> You cannot create subtypes of arrays, but I believe you can create
> subtypes of lists.
>
hmmm, I think not. See setu
See below for some additions, hopefully helpful :-)
Eddie Epstein wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 8/22/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1) Do you have any experiences with the memory footprint when using UIMA
>> AS? It seems to me that when deploying a larger system with multipl
Adam Lally wrote:
> On 8/23/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Adam Lally wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/23/07, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>
>> I've succeeded in getting maven to build the eclipse update site. Here
>> are some particulars, in case anyone wants to suggest improvements
>> before I commit things.
>>
>> First, I did two features. One
>From the repository mailing list, there's some discussion on how to
deploy things to the (maven, but in this case, snapshot) repositories.
Especially around the "permissions" element - this might be useful to
compare against what we plan to do :-)
-Marshall
Original Message
Su
Jörn Kottmann (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525671
> ]
>
> Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-565:
>
>
> I have seen one tutorial which has de
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Unfortunately there is no such documentation.
Well, we do have general (but not sandbox specific) docs on how to do
this on our website, here:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.eclipse
-Marshall
1 - 100 of 3230 matches
Mail list logo
