[us...@httpd] apache 2.2 mod rewrite/htaccess on windows 7

2010-11-11 Thread Sam Sherlock
I have set up php, mysql and apache 2.2 but I can't seem to get mod_rewrites to work things that worked fine on xp and also linux just don't work on windows 7 wordpress and cakephp rewrites but have also tried a simple test as follows RewriteEngine on RewriteRule bob.html alice.html I have a

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 mod rewrite/htaccess on windows 7

2010-11-11 Thread Joost de Heer
On 11/11/2010 05:48 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote: I have set up php, mysql and apache 2.2 but I can't seem to get mod_rewrites to work would greatly appreciate any ideas to resolve this RewriteLog and RewriteLogLevel are your friends. RewriteEngine on RewriteRule bob.html alice.html If this

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 mod rewrite/htaccess on windows 7

2010-11-11 Thread Sam Sherlock
Thanks Joost I had it working before reading you reply minor change to the rule and removing some stuff from conf - Options All seemed to help cakephp wordpress are also now rewriting I will be reading up on rewritelog and rewriteloglevel its useful to have friendly tools to assist when things

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 mod rewrite/htaccess on windows 7

2010-11-11 Thread Eric Covener
RewriteEngine on RewriteRule bob.html alice.html If this is in the main config, then this will never get matched, since the main config will use full pathnames (i.e. /bob.html if the URL is http://localhost/bob.html). it would still match since it's not anchored, but it would normally

[us...@httpd] apache 2.2 mod_status - Total Accesses is successfully served throughput?

2010-10-14 Thread Aaron Sonntag
I have Apache 2.2.14 with mod_status running as a proxy for an application server. Ultimately I would like to measure the actual number of requests successfully served by Apache (successful meaning an entry in the access log is written, be it 404, 200, 500, etc). One way to do this is to count

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2.x with Virtual IPs

2010-10-05 Thread Pravesh Rai
Hi All, Observed that Apache 2.2.6 ( .15) throws exception inconsistently, at different places, when the setup (Windows 2003 x86, with 4-12 GB RAM) is configured with many Virtual IPs. This behavior differs on different setups. On some setup, it fails even with 10-15 VIPs, but on the other, it

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2.x with Virtual IPs

2010-10-05 Thread Craig Huffstetler
Do anybody has any clue on this ? Can you show us an error log and/or the exceptions given? Also, what are the different setups? I would start to guess at problems given your configuration, but would love to see what errors are actually being produced. Thanks, Craig

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2.x with Virtual IPs

2010-10-05 Thread Pravesh Rai
Openssl Apache (all modules) has been recompiled. Thanks. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Craig Huffstetler craig.huffstet...@gmail.com wrote: Attached is the error log. Have you recompiled mod_ssl and updated OpenSSL? Craig

Fwd: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 slow transfers on Windows Server 2003

2010-05-14 Thread Antonio Vidal Ferrer
Have you verified that you don't have the dns resolution turned on? Check config files for HostnameLookups, it should be off (it is by default but better to check) Hope you find the solution soon Best, Antonio Vidal El 13/05/2010 19:41, Cameron Altenhof-Long escribió: We're having a

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 slow transfers on Windows Server 2003

2010-05-14 Thread Cameron Altenhof-Long
Thanks for the suggestion. I checked config files for HostnameLookups but didn't find anything. To further validate my observations, I set up a new Windows 2003 instance on Amazon, loaded WAMP (Apache 2.2.11), enabled IIS and also loaded the Abyss Web Server. Apache was significantly slower

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 slow transfers on Windows Server 2003

2010-05-14 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Cameron Altenhof-Long came...@metagear.com wrote: Thanks for the suggestion. I checked config files for HostnameLookups but didn't find anything. To further validate my observations, I set up a new Windows 2003 instance on Amazon, loaded WAMP (Apache 2.2.11),

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 slow transfers on Windows Server 2003

2010-05-13 Thread Cameron Altenhof-Long
We're having a performance problem with Apache running on Windows Server 2003 and have not been able to resolve it using any of the previously mentioned suggestions. The server runs Windows Server 2003 SP2 and Apache 2.2.13. We have also tested Apache 2.2.15 on Windows Server 2008 through an

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 downloading file instead of displaying

2010-04-23 Thread Igor Cicimov
It looks like the Content-Disposition header is set to attachment for your .php and .html files and I don't know why. You can try putting following in your apache config file: FilesMatch \.html$ ForceType text/html /FilesMatch and see if it works. Igor On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM,

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 downloading file instead of displaying

2010-04-22 Thread Duane A. Garner
I installed Apache 2.2 and PHP 5, I got it all working and all of a sudden I try to open WordPress index.php and it wants to download the file instead of display it, then Apache crashes. I restarted, still doing so, then I uninstalled and even restored PC and it still wants to download the

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread Geoff Millikan
Here's three things I wish I had read about Apache optimization that are not commonly discussed (we found out by years of trial and error). These three settings are worth more than all the other optimization we've done (e.g. SendBufferSize, AcceptFilter http data, EnableMMAP On, EnableSendfile

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread Geoff Millikan
if your server averages 300 simulatious connections, you need to start with 300 servers, and you never want it to drop below that number. Your experience might show otherwise however based on our experience - if we averaged 300 new customers/min at once (not 300 requests/sec) a MinSpareServers

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/22/2010 5:08 AM, Geoff Millikan wrote: if your server averages 300 simulatious connections, you need to start with 300 servers, and you never want it to drop below that number. Your experience might show otherwise however based on our experience - if we averaged 300 new customers/min

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread Nick Kew
On 22 Mar 2010, at 08:34, Geoff Millikan wrote: Here's three things I wish I had read about Apache optimization that are not commonly discussed (we found out by years of trial and error). Thanks for sharing! 1. Set your KeepAliveTimeout to 3 seconds or less. +1. Isn't that documented?

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread Geoff Millikan
Fair enough, but if your testing was of ~30 requests, and we are believing that the typical browser is making 6 simultaneous connections, then it sounds like the real magic was 6 * fudge factor of 5 ;-P LOL, yes, I totally agree and I kept thinking that no optimization guide has

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Geoff Millikan gmilli...@t1shopper.com wrote: Fair enough, but if your testing was of ~30 requests, and we are believing that the typical browser is making 6 simultaneous connections, then it sounds like the real magic was 6 * fudge factor of 5 ;-P LOL, yes,

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 optimization - Three tips

2010-03-22 Thread Geoff Millikan
+1. Isn't that documented? I'm surprised! Suppose so, as a n00b though, I thought maybe cutting the default time of 15 in half would do it. It didn't. With many people on fast Internet connections now, even 1 or 2 second KeepAliveTimeout's seem to work good. Interesting! Do you have any

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-20 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 21:39, inas inassen mezgh...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi these are my config files in httpd.conf add [...] Thank you! Following these instructions, reading here and there and putting it all together, I managed to get it to work. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-15 Thread inas inassen
. /Engine that's it From: mezgh...@hotmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org; f...@one2team.com Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:40:21 + Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented? English message follows Salut Francis Le

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
Hello everyone, For a production platform, we have plans to migrate to Apache 2.2, using mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer instead of mod_jk. Unfortunately, while the single Tomcat below case works with no problem, the balancer does not work at all... Here is the relevant part of the

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread Philip Wigg
2010/1/14 Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com: Hello everyone, For a production platform, we have plans to migrate to Apache 2.2, using mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy_balancer instead of mod_jk. Unfortunately, while the single Tomcat below case works with no problem, the balancer does not work

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
Hi Francis, I use mod_proxy_ajp to proxy Pentaho, also a Tomcat application. I think what you are looking for is ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain so the cookies are set for the right domain. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreversecookiedomain Let me know if you want me

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:34, Devraj Mukherjee dev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Francis, I use mod_proxy_ajp to proxy Pentaho, also a Tomcat application. I think what you are looking for is ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain so the cookies are set for the right domain.

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:33, Philip Wigg p...@philipwigg.co.uk wrote: ProxySet is only available in Apache 2.2 and later. Are you sure you're running the 'httpd -S' from the right version of Apache? Yes, this is Apache 2.2. 2.2.3 to be precise (the one bundled with rhel5). -- Francis

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread Francis GALIEGUE
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:42, Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:34, Devraj Mukherjee dev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Francis, I use mod_proxy_ajp to proxy Pentaho, also a Tomcat application. I think what you are looking for is ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain so the

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented?

2010-01-14 Thread inas inassen
this parameter. Now, I am at home, when I'll get to the office tomorrow I'll send to you my config. Inas Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:28:37 +0100 From: f...@one2team.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2: mod_proxy_balancer does not work as documented? Hello everyone

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-11 Thread Eric Covener
can you elaborate on the solution you alluded to in the bugzilla? I am guessing LDAPConnectionTimeout should be configuring a different option keyword? What did you change, and where did you change it? - The official

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-09 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi Eric and other Guys I just want to clarify one more. Fail over cases Case 1) If ldap1 server is unreachable (in case of ISP down or internet link down) Case 2) If ldap1 server is up and accessible and running but ldap service is not running only. I can check thoroughly, Apache failover

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-09 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eric and other Guys I just want to clarify one more. Fail over cases Case 1) If ldap1 server is unreachable (in case of ISP down or internet link down) Case 2) If ldap1 server is up and accessible and

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-09 Thread Muzammel Asghar
HI Eric I can close browser and access url again but this time no error comes in error log file in debugging mode, but my request url is currently still in processing and apache is trying to seek ldap1. Muzi On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.comwrote: Hi

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-09 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi Eric Below comes in apache debug logs when primary ldap1 is unreachable or down. [Sat Jan 09 20:05:58 2010] [debug] proxy_util.c(1806): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 22152 for worker proxy:reverse [Sat Jan 09 20:05:58 2010] [debug] proxy_util.c(1825): proxy: worker proxy:reverse

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi All Any more discussion and suggestions regarding this thread can some one use two ldap hosts and successfully test the ldap fail over auth with apache ? My apache conf which i mentioned is ok or not ? Please suggest. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Muzammel Asghar

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All Any more discussion and suggestions regarding this thread can some one use two ldap hosts and successfully test the ldap fail over auth with apache ? Works for me. I couldn't understand any of your

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi Thanks Erics, now i mention the conf section which i configure for ldap fail over auth, you can please check and tell its ok or not, becuase its not currently working with ldap fail over. I can setup this file in my -- /etc/httpd/conf.d/ldaptest.config I define only here below the ldap

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Thanks Erics, now i mention the conf section which i configure for ldap fail over auth, you can please check and tell its ok or not, becuase its not currently working with ldap fail over. That is all handled

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi Thanks Eric, currently ldap is running fine, i can use ssh and ftp auth with ldap also, its working f9 and also with ldap fail over auth. Now in apache case, its also working f9 with ldap1 but when ldap1 goes down, its not forward request to ldap2, this problem is for apache only, other ldap

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi Eric Kindly send ur sample apache conf for ldap fail over auth so i can compare my values with it. or please suggest how to make it effective. Thanks On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Thanks Eric, currently ldap is running fine, i can use

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-08 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Guys if any one successfully implement ldap fail over auth with apache then please give suggestions, as i think its the right mailling list from where i can put questions and need feedbacks. Thanks On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Eric Kindly

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-07 Thread Muzammel Asghar
hi Guys I am using apache version Apache/2.2.13 (Unix) on Fedora -11 , and using ldap as url authentications. I setup my conf in -- /etc/httpd/conf.d/mydomain.conf with below values I define only here below the ldap related entries only. LDAPTrustedMode TLS LDAPConnectionTimeout 7 Directory

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-07 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Muzammel Asghar muzammel.li...@gmail.com wrote: So please kindly give suggestions , what i need extra to make ldap fail over effective. What LDAP client is Apache linked with, and how does an ldapsearch client behave linked to the same one? What's the LogLevel

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 not working with LDAP Fail Over Auth

2010-01-07 Thread Muzammel Asghar
Hi Eric LDAP Client = apache try to linked with ldap2 if ldap1 fails i submited the conf in which i use ldap auth for apache LDAPTrustedMode TLS LDAPConnectionTimeout 4 Directory /var/www/html/test AuthName Testing Ldap fail over AuthType Basic # The LDAP server(s) AuthLDAPURL

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2

2009-12-05 Thread Jos Chrispijn
Just migrated to apache-2.2.13 and already ran into this problem: myserver# apachectl fullstatus Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server. Even getting the same error when logged on as 'root' Can you tell me what is causing this? Thanks. Jos

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2

2009-12-05 Thread Rich Bowen
On Dec 5, 2009, at 08:18 , Jos Chrispijn wrote: Just migrated to apache-2.2.13 and already ran into this problem: myserver# apachectl fullstatus Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server. Even getting the same error when logged on as 'root' Can you

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2

2009-12-05 Thread Daniel Reinhardt
Just migrated to apache-2.2.13 and already ran into this problem: myserver# apachectl fullstatus Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /server-status on this server. Even getting the same error when logged on as 'root' Can you tell me what is causing this? Thanks. Jos Check

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2

2009-12-05 Thread Jos Chrispijn
Rich Bowen wrote: Being logged on as root makes no difference, because this is a HTTP request to the server. What does the error log say? You're probably lacking an allow from directive somewhere. See: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/ClientDeniedByServerConfiguration and Just found out (reading

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-27 Thread Hendrik Schmieder
William A. Rowe Jr. schrieb: Peter Schober wrote: * Hendrik Schmiederhendrik.schmie...@jedox.com [2009-11-19 12:53]: Is mod_fcgid stable enough for production usage ? Yes agreed [1] [1] there is an issue handling large POST bodies in 2.3.4, you may wish to stay with 2.3.1 (not

[us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-19 Thread Hendrik Schmieder
Hello, can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ? tia Hendrik - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-19 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Hendrik Schmieder hendrik.schmie...@jedox.com wrote: Hello, can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ? mod_fcgid was maintained by a third party until relatively recently, and just recently being worked on inside of Apache as a

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-19 Thread Hendrik Schmieder
Eric Covener schrieb: On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Hendrik Schmieder hendrik.schmie...@jedox.com wrote: Hello, can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ? mod_fcgid was maintained by a third party until relatively recently, and just recently being worked on

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Schober
* Hendrik Schmieder hendrik.schmie...@jedox.com [2009-11-19 12:53]: Is mod_fcgid stable enough for production usage ? Yes -peter - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Hendrik Schmieder wrote: Hello, can somebody tell why mod_fcgid is not part of the apache distribution ? Mostly because it is evolving faster/out of sync with the httpd distribution, and applies to all of the 2.0, 2.2 and trunk distributions. Will it become part of the core once it is

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and mod_fcgid

2009-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Peter Schober wrote: * Hendrik Schmieder hendrik.schmie...@jedox.com [2009-11-19 12:53]: Is mod_fcgid stable enough for production usage ? Yes agreed [1] [1] there is an issue handling large POST bodies in 2.3.4, you may wish to stay with 2.3.1 (not recommended though), or grab from

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 coredumping on Solaris with Subversion 1.6

2009-11-05 Thread skrishnam...@bloomberg.com
Hi, I compiled subversion with apache 2.2 on solaris but when I hit the server with an svn request, it produces a core dump. Running a pstack on the core file produces: # /bin/pstack /bb/cores/core.httpd.5718.1257279721 core '/bb/cores/core.httpd.5718.1257279721' of 5718:

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 + Ldap

2009-09-24 Thread Luis Clemente
Hi all, Someone knows how I can setting the apache 2.2. server to authenticated in a Ldap server? Here is my httpd.conf Ldap configuration: Directory /var/www/html AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthType basic AuthLDAPURL ldap://ldapserver.com:389/o=domain.com?mail;

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 + Ldap

2009-09-24 Thread Tom Evans
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 05:55 -0700, Luis Clemente wrote: Hi all, Someone knows how I can setting the apache 2.2. server to authenticated in a Ldap server? Here is my httpd.conf Ldap configuration: Directory /var/www/html AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthType basic AuthLDAPURL

[us...@httpd] apache 2.2 / mod_proxy / parameters

2009-08-21 Thread Petteri Heinonen
Hello list users. I'm struggling with mod_proxy parameters related to amount of open connections to backend etc. Here is an excerpt of my configuration: ProxyPass /exchange/ https://exchange.company.com/exchange/ min=10 max=32 acquire=1 keepalive=on retry=5 timeout=15 ProxyPassReverse

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and ldap group authentication

2009-06-02 Thread Jeff Shearer
Thanks Peter for all of your suggestions. I have followed them all with the exception of your security recommendations. I have avoided this matter in an attempt to minimize the complexity of the problem so my small mind can see what is happening. As you suggested Peter, I have read logs,

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and ldap group authentication

2009-06-02 Thread Peter Schober
* Jeff Shearer j...@shearer-family.org [2009-06-02 16:32]: Over the last 3 days I have played with a number of configurations and executed numerous varieties of searchs. But to no good. If you look down to the caption My Best Result, It seems OpenLDAP has made it to the point where it is

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and ldap group authentication

2009-06-02 Thread Jeff Shearer
I have done what you suggested and was able to get what I thought Apache needed but that didn't seem to work once put into Apache. I do think you are right, this is the wrong group to ask. Peter Schober wrote: * Jeff Shearer j...@shearer-family.org [2009-06-02 16:32]: Over the last 3 days I

[us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and ldap group authentication

2009-05-27 Thread Jeff Shearer
I have been trying to implement group-based authentication using LDAP. But have yet to find the secret. I have been able to implement individual authentication using the “require ldap-user [username]” directive successfully. Some background information: I am using FreeBSD 7.2, Apache 2.2,

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and ldap group authentication

2009-05-27 Thread Peter Schober
* Jeff Shearer j...@shearer-family.org [2009-05-27 08:43]: dn: cn=SuperTeam,ou=groups,dc=my,dc=mydomain,dc=com ou: groups description: People who are employees of Super Team uniqueMember: uid=jeffshearer,dc=my,dc=mydomain,dc=com uniqueMember: uid=maeshearer,dc=my,dc=mydomain,dc=com

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and ldap group authentication

2009-05-27 Thread Peter Schober
* Peter Schober peter.scho...@univie.ac.at [2009-05-27 12:33]: I have tried a number of configurations for group authenticaiton, all without success. Following is the current iteration of my apache configuration for the superteam.docs directory: Directory /files/superteam.docs

[us...@httpd] [Apache 2.2] Issues with mod_autoindex

2009-05-19 Thread McGarr, J. Michael
I am new to Apache installations and administration and I have a new Apache httpd instance setup and I would like to setup autoindexing on a certain directory. I only get 404 errors from the directory. I checked to see if mod_autoindex is being loaded and I didn't see it in the httpd.conf

RE: [us...@httpd] [Apache 2.2] Issues with mod_autoindex

2009-05-19 Thread McGarr, J. Michael
Ok, so I just confirmed that the autoindex_module is loaded statically, so that is not the issue. From: McGarr, J. Michael [mailto:mike.mcg...@excella.com] Sent: Tue 5/19/2009 4:56 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [us...@httpd] [Apache 2.2] Issues

[us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and fastcgi 2.4.6

2009-04-21 Thread root
hello i have debian lenny 64bit lenny server with intel quadcore cpu and 4gb ram (fastcgi 2.4.6). i have about 1.4 tb traffic month on this server. my problem is the speed of fastcgi application. when i want the visit one website on my server somethimes i must wait about 4 seconds the view

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and fastcgi 2.4.6

2009-04-21 Thread Brian Mearns
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:14 PM, r...@menkisys.net wrote: hello  i have debian lenny 64bit lenny server with intel quadcore cpu and 4gb ram (fastcgi 2.4.6). i have about 1.4 tb traffic month on this server. my problem is the speed of fastcgi application. when i want the visit one website on

Re: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2 and fastcgi 2.4.6

2009-04-21 Thread André Warnier
r...@menkisys.net wrote: MaxKeepAliveRequests is 60 KeepAliveTimeout is 3 I don't know fastcgi at all, so I have no idea if something at that level explains your symptoms. But why don't you try to reduce MaxKeepAliveRequests to, for example, MaxKeepAliveRequests 5 or whatever number

RE: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 certificate directory

2009-04-07 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Prasanna Ram Venkatachalam Sent: April 6, 2009 17:00 As far as i remember there is no such thing as standard for putting certificates though i suggest not to put certificates anywhere in DocumentRoot(s) (just to avoid extrernal access). Apart from that any localsystem location should

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 certificate directory

2009-04-06 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
Hi All: I am in the process of upgrading our systems from RHEL3 to RMEL5 and this includes upgrading our web server from Apache 2.0.46 to 2.2.3. In review the my previous installation notes and the current docs it appears that the /etc/http/conf/ssl.crt and ssl.key directories are no long used.

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 certificate directory

2009-04-06 Thread Prasanna Ram Venkatachalam
As far as i remember there is no such thing as standard for putting certificates though i suggest not to put certificates anywhere in DocumentRoot(s) (just to avoid extrernal access). Apart from that any localsystem location should be fine. For finer understanding/convenience u can put it under

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 asks for client certificate when it shouldn't

2008-12-31 Thread Miguel Angel Tormo Alfaro
El Martes, 30 de Diciembre de 2008 17:53:42 krist.vanbes...@gmail.com escribió: On 12/30/08, Miguel Angel Tormo Alfaro mli...@edicom.eu wrote: I thought it could be a browser issue, however the same config in apache 2.0 doesn't behave this way. On the other hand I'm able to reproduce the

[us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 asks for client certificate when it shouldn't

2008-12-30 Thread Miguel Angel Tormo Alfaro
Hi all, I recently installed an apache web server using version 2.2.9, and I'm having strange issues with the SSL behaviour. I don't need client certificate validation so I didn't use the directive SSLVerifyClient. However, as apache asked for a client certificate, I changed the

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 2.2 asks for client certificate when it shouldn't

2008-12-30 Thread krist . vanbesien
On 12/30/08, Miguel Angel Tormo Alfaro mli...@edicom.eu wrote: I thought it could be a browser issue, however the same config in apache 2.0 doesn't behave this way. On the other hand I'm able to reproduce the problem with firefox 2, 3, seamonkey 1.1.7 and konqueror. I don't see anything