On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:43:42 -0400
Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> need to do
> something on a website that requires IE to work properly.
You don't need to run Microsoft Windows to do that:
http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Main_Page
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ h
bg wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 14:22, Charlie Seaman wrote:
I am not expecting ever to move to a new version of Windows unless
someone else pays for it, and only then if there is some other reason to
do so.
You do realize that MikeySquirt is going to do their level best
to see to it
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 14:22, Charlie Seaman wrote:
> I am not expecting ever to move to a new version of Windows unless
> someone else pays for it, and only then if there is some other reason to
> do so.
You do realize that MikeySquirt is going to do their level best
to see to it that when *the
Robin Laing wrote:
Charlie Seaman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 23:26:34 Charlie Seaman wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:19:46 -0400
Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I have to replace a system or MS
stops supporting MS2000 I'm
Charlie Seaman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 23:26:34 Charlie Seaman wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:19:46 -0400
Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I have to replace a system or MS
stops supporting MS2000 I'm sure I will be mig
from a previous upgrade.
Hopefully, MS will keep it up for a few more years.
- Original Message -
From: "Charlie Seaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: Please recommend some email clients to use
[EMAIL PROTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 23:26:34 Charlie Seaman wrote:
Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:19:46 -0400
Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I have to replace a system or MS
stops supporting MS2000 I'm sure I will be migrating to Linux.
John Meyer wrote:
Robin Laing wrote:
Charlie Seaman wrote:
Certainly not if you are in a position where you have to pay for it.
I have been using Thunderbird for two or three years now with no more
problems than I used to have with Outlook Express or Outlook.
Guess wrote:
We were moved t
Guy Voets wrote:
Hello,
Anyone else on Eudora?
I've been using Eudora on my Mac for zillions of years.
Hardly any problems, and I like all the possibilities it offers.
If I have problems, it's because my provider doesn't like images
pasted into messages and throws them away as spam.
I Eudora
Hello,
Anyone else on Eudora?
I've been using Eudora on my Mac for zillions of years.
Hardly any problems, and I like all the possibilities it offers.
If I have problems, it's because my provider doesn't like images
pasted into messages and throws them away as spam.
--
Guy
Dodoes can't afford to
On Sunday 21 October 2007 23:26:34 Charlie Seaman wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:19:46 -0400
> >
> > Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> If I have to replace a system or MS
> >> stops supporting MS2000 I'm sure I will be migrating to Linux.
> >
> > That shouldn't be
Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:19:46 -0400
Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I have to replace a system or MS
stops supporting MS2000 I'm sure I will be migrating to Linux.
That shouldn't be too long now:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/news
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:19:46 -0400
Charlie Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I have to replace a system or MS
> stops supporting MS2000 I'm sure I will be migrating to Linux.
That shouldn't be too long now:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/server/evaluation/news/bulletins/extendedsuppo
Like (probably) most people, I don't want to have to go through the
process of becoming accustomed to a new operating system until I have
to. Microsoft has not had much money from me recently since I use
Windows 2000 and will do so until forced to change. I also use Open
Office, Mozilla and Th
John wrote:
> client where you could set rules based on regular expressions and have a
> little more parsing power.
All I'd like is for procmail to be the macro language for mail
filtering/handling.
I haven't seen any email client that could do half of the things I can
do in procmail.
(Now tryin
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:17:16 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Friday 19 October 2007 14:29:44 Charlie Seaman wrote:
> > It looks like it's for linux. Does it work on Windows?
>
> I saw that it is being worked on but no it is not available on
> Windows yet. There are more Linux apps finding th
On Friday 19 October 2007 18:13:22 M Henri Day wrote:
> 2007/10/19, Fred A. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Charlie Seaman wrote:
> > > It looks like it's for linux. Does it work on Windows?
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:21:19 Guess wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
On Friday 19 October 2007 14:29:44 Charlie Seaman wrote:
> It looks like it's for linux. Does it work on Windows?
I saw that it is being worked on but no it is not available on
Windows yet. There are more Linux apps finding their way to the
Windows platform everyday. Eventually people will find
NoOp wrote:
[snip]
> Look: I've been using email client since Tymnet days, and at one point
> or another something can and will get screwed up. I've used Pine, Tymnet
> (disclaimer I used to work for Tymnet), MCI mail, Netscape, Mozilla (the
> original), Outlook, Evolution etc., etc. I happen to
On 10/19/2007 07:39 PM, NoOp wrote:
> Then you've never spent any time in mozilla.support.seamonkey - have
> you?
Correction:
Then you've never spent any time in mozilla.support.thunderbird - have
you?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On 10/19/2007 06:43 PM, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 10/19/2007 04:07 AM, James Knott wrote:
>>
>>> I spent some time supporting users running Outlook and saw a lot of such
>>> problems. While I haven't the same level of experience with
>>> Thunderbird, I've never seen it or Seamonke
NoOp wrote:
> On 10/19/2007 04:07 AM, James Knott wrote:
>
>> I spent some time supporting users running Outlook and saw a lot of such
>> problems. While I haven't the same level of experience with
>> Thunderbird, I've never seen it or Seamonkey lose any mail.
>
> Then you've not spent much time
Right now I'm on Thunderbird/Penelope, but I'd really like to get a
client where you could set rules based on regular expressions and have a
little more parsing power. For instance, I'd want to set up a rule
where if a message came with a read receipt, the client just ignored
it. If this can
On 10/19/2007 04:07 AM, James Knott wrote:
>
> I spent some time supporting users running Outlook and saw a lot of such
> problems. While I haven't the same level of experience with
> Thunderbird, I've never seen it or Seamonkey lose any mail.
Then you've not spent much time on the mozilla.supp
2007/10/19, Fred A. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Charlie Seaman wrote:
> > It looks like it's for linux. Does it work on Windows?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:21:19 Guess wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> You have no idea what you are talking about. You have never
Charlie Seaman wrote:
> It looks like it's for linux. Does it work on Windows?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:21:19 Guess wrote:
>>
>>> I would stick with MS Outlook
>>> it's the best so far compared to the rest
>>> and no, I don't work for MS
>>>
>>
>> You h
It looks like it's for linux. Does it work on Windows?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:21:19 Guess wrote:
I would stick with MS Outlook
it's the best so far compared to the rest
and no, I don't work for MS
You have no idea what you are talking about. You have n
Charlie Seaman wrote:
Certainly not if you are in a position where you have to pay for it. I
have been using Thunderbird for two or three years now with no more
problems than I used to have with Outlook Express or Outlook.
Guess wrote:
We were moved to exchange server with no imap or pop ac
Richard Detwiler wrote:
> James Knott wrote:
>> Guess wrote:
>>
>>> I would stick with MS Outlook
>>> it's the best so far compared to the rest
>>> and no, I don't work for MS
>>>
>>
>> How's the spam filtering in Outlook? Ever had a PST file corrupt,
>> losing lots of mail?
>>
>
> Not
On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:21:19 Guess wrote:
> I would stick with MS Outlook
> it's the best so far compared to the rest
> and no, I don't work for MS
You have no idea what you are talking about. You have never used
Kontact. Outlook doesn't even come close to Kontact.
Kontact has:
Summary
Certainly not if you are in a position where you have to pay for it. I
have been using Thunderbird for two or three years now with no more
problems than I used to have with Outlook Express or Outlook.
Guess wrote:
I would stick with MS Outlook
it's the best so far compared to the rest
and no,
James Knott wrote:
Guess wrote:
I would stick with MS Outlook
it's the best so far compared to the rest
and no, I don't work for MS
How's the spam filtering in Outlook? Ever had a PST file corrupt,
losing lots of mail?
Not that I'm recommending MS Outlook -- but I used it for
Guess wrote:
> I would stick with MS Outlook
> it's the best so far compared to the rest
> and no, I don't work for MS
>
How's the spam filtering in Outlook? Ever had a PST file corrupt,
losing lots of mail?
-
To unsubscribe,
I would stick with MS Outlook
it's the best so far compared to the rest
and no, I don't work for MS
"CSRote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I do not know anything about email clients other than MS Outlook. Please
> recommend what I could (should?) use.
>
>
>
> Than
34 matches
Mail list logo
