[users] Re: Why is OO my default?

2011-03-15 Thread James Wilde
Lisa, that's a Mac thing rather than an OOo thing. In Finder, mark a document of the type you want to open in something else, and right click on Get info. I'm going to assume you want to open, say .doc files in MS Word. So click on a .doc file in Finder and select Get info. You will see a

[users] Re: Why is OO my default?

2011-03-15 Thread Barbara Duprey
On 3/15/2011 7:37 AM, Lisa Dee wrote: I have installed OpenOffice on my MacBook Pro as a favor to my employer. Now every document, regardless of file extension, is automatically launched through OpenOffice. How do I change OO so that it is NOT my default app? Lisa Dee You'll need to change

[users] Re: Why is OO my default?

2011-03-15 Thread Larry Gusaas
Hi, I'm sending a copy of this to Lisa since I don't think she is subscribed to the list. The header for unsubscribed posters is now (if I'm correct) X-Sympa-To: users@openoffice.org On 2011/03/15 2:40 PM James Wilde wrote: Lisa, that's a Mac thing rather than an OOo thing. In Finder, mark a

[users] Re: Why is OO my default?

2011-03-15 Thread James Wilde
Thanks Larry. I did a quick search for the word moderate but didn't see it. Didn't know it had been changed. //J On Mar 15, 2011, at 23:40 , Larry Gusaas wrote: Hi, I'm sending a copy of this to Lisa since I don't think she is subscribed to the list. The header for unsubscribed

[users] Re: Why is OO my default?

2011-03-15 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2011/03/15 4:44 PM James Wilde wrote: Thanks Larry. I did a quick search for the word moderate but didn't see it. Didn't know it had been changed. One of the many changes due to the migration. I found it because I post through gmane and everything I sent started going through the

[users] Re: Why is OO my default?

2011-03-15 Thread Barbara Duprey
On 3/15/2011 6:01 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2011/03/15 4:44 PM James Wilde wrote: Thanks Larry. I did a quick search for the word moderate but didn't see it. Didn't know it had been changed. One of the many changes due to the migration. I found it because I post through gmane and

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-11 Thread NoOp
On 08/11/2010 06:39 PM, Paul wrote: ... I realise that some people's language on this list can be colourful, but I'm sure we have all seen worse. I'm not going to prevent moderation just due to language. On ocassions I'll caution people as I approve the message but these are rare. Let me

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-11 Thread Paul
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:37 PM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: On 08/11/2010 06:39 PM, Paul wrote: ... I realise that some people's language on this list can be colourful, but I'm sure we have all seen worse. I'm not going to prevent moderation just due to language. On ocassions I'll

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-10 Thread Bernd Eilers
Hi there! [...snip...] Sorry, but that doesn't excuse Michelle for posting this way. How about we all start posting with unsub profanity as well? Perhaps Paul should just drop the posts. There is a maybe better alternative available. Each of the OpenOffice.orgs mailingllists has an

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-10 Thread Barbara Duprey
Bernd Eilers wrote: Hi there! [...snip...] Sorry, but that doesn't excuse Michelle for posting this way. How about we all start posting with unsub profanity as well? Perhaps Paul should just drop the posts. There is a maybe better alternative available. Each of the OpenOffice.orgs

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-10 Thread John Kaufmann
Bernd, this is astonishing: In a message dated 2010.08.10 05:12 -0500, Bernd Eilers wrote: ... Each of the OpenOffice.orgs mailingllists has an allowed-posters list which can contain email addresses of people who can post to the list without being subscribed and without being moderated.

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-09 Thread Barbara Duprey
Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2010/08/06 12:49 PM Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello John Kaufmann, Why do you send the mail to the LIST (I read it), to my private accound and to my business cellphone? --- end quote --- He probably sent it to you because the headers of your message include:

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-09 Thread NoOp
On 08/09/2010 05:45 AM, Barbara Duprey wrote: Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2010/08/06 12:49 PM Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello John Kaufmann, Why do you send the mail to the LIST (I read it), to my private accound and to my business cellphone? --- end quote --- He probably sent it to you

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-09 Thread John Kaufmann
In a message dated 2010.08.09 08:45 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote: Michelle has a very unusual method of following the list -- not subscribing to the list or its digest for fear of spam, and not using Gmane, or nabble, or This means, of course, that all her messages go to Paul for moderation

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello John Kaufmann, Why do you send the mail to the LIST (I read it), to my private accound and to my business cellphone? Am 2010-08-06 00:11:05, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: Hi Michelle, In a message dated 2010.08.05 02:34 -0500, Michelle Konzack wrote: Oo is more worse then any other

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hallo Jean-Baptiste Faure, Am 2010-08-05 22:23:33, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: Bonjour Michelle, Avant d'affirmer des contre-vérités à propos d'un logiciel, il serait préférable d'apprendre à l'utiliser car OpenOffice.org n'est pas un clone du logiciel dont vous avez l'habitude.

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello NoOp, Am 2010-08-05 12:51:08, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: I wonder if this unsubscribed 'consultant' will remove OOo, Mozilla, and Pidgin from his web site (Workstations section): I am realy thin king on this since some time already!

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Johnny Rosenberg, Am 2010-08-05 23:28:06, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: What about if you insert a new section and insert the table there instead? Or if you insert the table in a frame? I don't know, since I never use OpenOffice.org Writer, but… well… Hell! -- I use LaTeX! -- and I

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Clayton, Am 2010-08-05 22:12:05, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: On 08/05/2010 08:34 AM, Michelle Konzack wrote: Oo is more worse then any other programs... Hi Michele. Cheer up :-) OOo can be frustrating... especially when you're fighting it instead of working with it. Every time

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2010/08/06 11:58 AM Michelle Konzack wrote: http://consultants.debian.tamay-dogan.net/?what=index and eventually fix the 160 Errors, 45 warning(s) in it (according to the W3C Markup Validation Service). :-D No time, I have to work!:-D --- end quote --- I hope the number of

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Hagar de l'Est
Hallo Jean-Baptiste Faure, Hmmm, warum antwortest Du eigentlich auf französische, wenn ich englisch schreibe? Hmm, vieleicht sollte ich türkisch oder farsi schreiben. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Because he has seen your address in your signature of course.

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2010/08/06 12:49 PM Michelle Konzack wrote: Hello John Kaufmann, Why do you send the mail to the LIST (I read it), to my private accound and to my business cellphone? --- end quote --- He probably sent it to you because the headers of your message include: Delivered-To: moderator for

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2010/8/6 Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net: Hallo Jean-Baptiste Faure, Am 2010-08-05 22:23:33, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:  Bonjour Michelle, Avant d'affirmer des contre-vérités à propos d'un logiciel, il serait préférable d'apprendre à l'utiliser car OpenOffice.org n'est

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-08 Thread John Kaufmann
In a message dated 2010.08.06 14:49 -0500, Michelle Konzack wrote: Why do you send the mail to the LIST (I read it), to my private accound and to my business cellphone? As a courtesy. The email address from which you posted linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net is not subscribed. [See header

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-06 Thread Michael
Michelle Konzack wrote: Oo is more worse then any other programs... Even MS Office (with limited capacities) is better working in WINE. Problem 1: OOo under Linux enforce every time page format A4 with 2,5cm border on all sides even if i setup this crapy program to

[users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-05 Thread NoOp
On 08/04/2010 11:34 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: Oo is more worse then any other programs... ... I HATE this OPEN OFFICE crap and I HATE peoples (french government) FORCING me to use this CRAP. OPENOFFICE, FIREFOX and PIDGIN are to most non-productive programs which the Open Source

Re: [users] Re: Why does owriter enforce tables of side width?

2010-08-05 Thread James Wilde
On Aug 5, 2010, at 21:51 , NoOp wrote: I wonder if this unsubscribed 'consultant' will remove OOo, Mozilla, and Pidgin from his web site (Workstations section): cough _her_ web site. ;) //J - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[users] Re: Why register Db?

2010-07-30 Thread NoOp
On 07/30/2010 10:11 AM, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: The default Ubuntu install doesn't include Base. (That's what you should have looked for in Synaptic). However, the Ubuntu install ALSO has a huge bug that doesn't allow external Addressbook sources to be used as registered databases. (See

Re: [users] Re: Why and how the OpenDocument format can save you a lot of time!

2010-05-22 Thread M. Fioretti
On Fri, May 21, 2010 19:51:38 PM -0400, Twayne (twa...@twaynesdomain.com) wrote: I have to wonder what the purpose of the post really is? ... I respectfully suggest that you use better marketing techniques... I'm afraid I can't see the relevancy or any use for the information on this avenue.

Re: [users] Re: Why and how the OpenDocument format can save you a lot of time!

2010-05-22 Thread Sylvia Sánchez
I'd like the article. It's fine to me to post that stuff Sylvia On Fri, May 21, 2010 19:51:38 PM -0400, Twayne wrote: I have to wonder what the purpose of the post really is? ... I respectfully suggest that you use better marketing techniques... I'm afraid I can't see the relevancy

[users] Re: Why and how the OpenDocument format can save you a lot of time!

2010-05-21 Thread Twayne
In news:20100521205425.gm2...@nexaima.net, M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net typed: Greetings, here is the introduction to a series of quick and dirty recipes I'll publish on my tips tricks website: http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/why-and-how-opendocument-format-can-save-you-lot-time If

[users] Re: Why this happens?

2008-08-29 Thread NoOp
On 08/28/2008 11:03 AM, Pedro Izecksohn wrote: Roman numbers turn to Greek characters when converting from odt to doc. It is incredible, so I took screen shots: http://www.izecksohn.com/leonardo/ok.jpg http://www.izecksohn.com/leonardo/problem.jpg It happens on Windows Vista, on at

[users] Re: Why does OOo need /proc?

2008-05-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hi Joe, Am 2008-05-08 11:55:58, schrieb Joe Smith: open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3 Oops--sent a few seconds too soon. Since /proc/meminfo is just ascii text, you could at least try replacing it with a static text file copied from a machine with similar hardware specs. I

[users] Re: Why does OOo need /proc?

2008-05-08 Thread Joe Smith
Michelle Konzack wrote: ... Problem: OOo need it! Question: Why? Why? is hard to say; what? is much easier: $ strace -o log ooffice -help OpenOffice.org 2.4 680m12(Build:9286) ... $ grep '/proc' log open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3

[users] Re: Why does OOo need /proc?

2008-05-08 Thread Joe Smith
Joe Smith wrote: ... $ grep '/proc' log open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3 open(/proc/meminfo, O_RDONLY) = 3 Oops--sent a few seconds too soon. Since /proc/meminfo is just ascii text, you could at least try replacing it with a static

[users] Re: Why I am unsubscribing from this list.

2008-04-09 Thread Jim Allan
John Boyle wrote: To Users and Wade Smart: First of all, I keep a file on just about everything that the list has on it, and I have no record of the question being asked. There is nothing called “the list”. There are a number of OpenOffice.org mailing lists. See

[users] Re: Why I am unsubscribing from this list.

2008-04-09 Thread Larry Gusaas
On 2008/04/09 3:15 PM, John Boyle wrote: To web at work: Thank you for your answer. Lisi Reisz did say that the question was asked as to where the meeting was to held, which I never saw. I would like the list to be unpolitical as well, and can use the help it provides. So why was the politics

[users] Re: Why can I not view my pages in the color I choose to type in?

2008-02-11 Thread Bob Long
[CC:d to user] Lorraine Dort wrote: OK so this is my third message from you people about the same question. DO YoU NOT TALK TO EACH OTHER? We do. But as we are volunteers, people chose what they reply to, for whatever reason. Anyway, there was a response to you, which I'm including

[users] Re: WHY

2008-01-02 Thread Bob Long
[CC:d to user] Oscar wrote: Hi, i keep downloading the openoffice version 2.3.1 and for some What file name, exactly are you downloading? Have you checked its integrity with MD5SUM (http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/using_md5sums.html)? reason it wont work for me, i had the veron before

Re: [users] Re: Why does 2.3 have fewer fonts than 2.1?

2007-11-25 Thread Harold Fuchs
On 25/11/2007, NoOp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/23/2007 10:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:28:46 -0600 Barbara Cornick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded 2.3, thinking it would be a better deal, but it is missing many of the fonts I had in 2.1, at least one that I

[users] Re: Why does 2.3 have fewer fonts than 2.1?

2007-11-24 Thread NoOp
On 11/23/2007 10:21 PM, Frank Cox wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:28:46 -0600 Barbara Cornick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downloaded 2.3, thinking it would be a better deal, but it is missing many of the fonts I had in 2.1, at least one that I use regularly (Helvetica). Why is 2.3 missing

[users] Re: WHY won't it save?

2007-08-14 Thread olin thompson
NoOp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 08/13/2007 06:10 AM, olin thompson wrote: I downloaded this OpenOffice.org because my publisher uses the program and doesn't like to shift between MSWord and his OO.o. So, I'm writing this book and it goes along fine. Your program saves every few minutes

Re: [users] Re: WHY won't it save?

2007-08-14 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
2007/8/14, olin thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoOp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 08/13/2007 06:10 AM, olin thompson wrote: I downloaded this OpenOffice.org because my publisher uses the program and doesn't like to shift between MSWord and his OO.o. So, I'm writing this book and it goes

[users] Re: WHY won't it save?

2007-08-14 Thread NoOp
On 08/13/2007 06:48 PM, olin thompson wrote: NoOp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On 08/13/2007 06:10 AM, olin thompson wrote: I downloaded this OpenOffice.org because my publisher uses the program and doesn't like to shift between MSWord and his OO.o. So, I'm writing this book and it goes

Re: [users] Re: WHY won't it save?

2007-08-14 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
Do you mean just to see if it works or for test purpose, or do you mean that he always always should be doing that? Because he clearly said that he only use OpenOffice.org because his publisher does, which means that he wants to save in the OpenDocument format, which he can't do in Word, right?

[users] Re: WHY won't it save?

2007-08-13 Thread NoOp
On 08/13/2007 06:10 AM, olin thompson wrote: I downloaded this OpenOffice.org because my publisher uses the program and doesn't like to shift between MSWord and his OO.o. So, I'm writing this book and it goes along fine. Your program saves every few minutes or so and I'm happy with that.

[users] Re: why is my email posted on the web

2007-07-29 Thread NoOp
On 07/29/2007 09:30 AM, M Henri Day wrote: I think Ken makes a valid point, with which we could easily deal by adding an explicit statement to the effect that those who post to this list thereby expose their email addresses to readers to the description of the Users Mail List above. The

[users] Re: Why does the Word import filter throw away template information

2007-05-06 Thread Joe Smith
Michael Soegtrop wrote: the help for the Writer word import states, that formating template information is thrown away on the inport and the template attributes become direct attributes. I wonder why this descision was made. ... I'm only guessing, but templates in Word and Writer are

[users] Re: Why we need something like Outlook

2007-04-12 Thread NoOp
On 04/12/2007 03:00 PM, PSC Inc wrote: Sorry hewnix: I do not know where you got your information, but you are incorrect. Outlook comes as part of even the most basic version of OFFICE, not the operating system. Again, MS OUTLOOK is part of OFFICE, not Windows. Umm... it's *not* included in

[users] Re: Why we need something like Outlook

2007-04-10 Thread PJH
Douglas Hinds keyed the following on 4/9/2007 2:21 PM: PJH wrote: The main reason Outlook is my choice is its integration of calendar, contacts, e-mails, documents, and tasks (to-dos). You can create a task and attach to it any relevant information including documents, e-mails, contact info

[users] Re: Why we need something like Outlook

2007-04-10 Thread NoOp
On 04/09/2007 04:56 PM, PJH wrote: I have heard all the arguments as to why no one needs Outlook, but last night, my niece, a very smart person (full scholarship to MIT, MSCompSci at Berkeley paid for by Bell Labs, etc.) gave me her reasons for using Outlook. [snip] Pre-Outlook, I

[users] Re: Why we need something like Outlook

2007-04-10 Thread NoOp
On 04/10/2007 10:56 AM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: On Tuesday 10 April 2007 13:17, my mailbox was graced by a missive from Chris Cioffi [EMAIL PROTECTED] who wrote: While not everyone needs all the languages, many people (especially in Europe) are multi-lingual and benefit from having

Re: [users] Re: Why we need something like Outlook

2007-04-10 Thread William Case
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:14 -0700, NoOp wrote: On 04/09/2007 04:56 PM, PJH wrote: I have heard all the arguments as to why no one needs Outlook, but last night, my niece, a very smart person (full scholarship to MIT, MSCompSci at Berkeley paid for by Bell Labs, etc.) gave me her

Re: [users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-31 Thread Cameron Smith
The msg Title was OpenOffice.org announces Version 2.2 I'm not sure of the mgs number On 30/03/07, NoOp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 03/29/2007 06:03 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: On Thursday March 29 2007 7:51 pm, NoOp wrote: Just noticed the recent questions regarding install etc., for 2.2 this

Re: [users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-30 Thread Michael Adams
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:28:13 -0700 NoOp wrote: Haven't seen it just did a refresh and search on 2.2; can you give me a subject perhaps msg number? The announcement was made (reasonably enough) on the [ooo-announce] list. I don't think it was made on the [users] list.

[users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-30 Thread NoOp
On 03/30/2007 04:12 AM, Michael Adams wrote: You are just miffed as can be seen by your sarcasm, and why is that? Because you have a problem. When you ask for the same email to be posted to three lists you are increasing my overheads and making it my problem. Please don't make your problem

Re: [users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-30 Thread Manfred J. Krause
Hi *, NoOp wrote: [...] Michael Adams wrote: You are just miffed as can be seen by your sarcasm, and why is that? Because you have a problem. When you ask for the same email to be posted to three lists you are increasing my overheads and making it my problem. Please don't make your problem

[users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-29 Thread NoOp
On 03/29/2007 06:03 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: On Thursday March 29 2007 7:51 pm, NoOp wrote: Just noticed the recent questions regarding install etc., for 2.2 this afternoon; didn't see them this morning, nor did I see an announcement here or on OOo general or releases (other than the

Re: [users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-29 Thread John W. Kennedy
NoOp wrote: On 03/29/2007 06:03 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: On Thursday March 29 2007 7:51 pm, NoOp wrote: Just noticed the recent questions regarding install etc., for 2.2 this afternoon; didn't see them this morning, nor did I see an announcement here or on OOo general or releases (other than the

[users] Re: Why no OOo 2.2 announcement?

2007-03-29 Thread NoOp
On 03/29/2007 06:25 PM, John W. Kennedy wrote: NoOp wrote: On 03/29/2007 06:03 PM, Dan Lewis wrote: On Thursday March 29 2007 7:51 pm, NoOp wrote: Just noticed the recent questions regarding install etc., for 2.2 this afternoon; didn't see them this morning, nor did I see an announcement

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-02-20 Thread Harold Fuchs
Original Message Subject: Re:[users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) From: James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@openoffice.org, Harold Fuchs users@openoffice.org Date: Mon Jan 29 2007 01:49:14 GMT+ (GMT Standard

[users] Re: Why does Open Office open XLS files using Writer instead of Calc?

2007-02-18 Thread NoOp
On 02/18/2007 11:59 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi. Indeed you make a good point. I'm not sure what constitutes a correctly formatted XLS file but I suspect that this one is not since it is readable in a Linux text editor. Looks more like some form of XML or something more generic. I've

Re: [users] Re: Why does Open Office open XLS files using Writer instead of Calc?

2007-02-18 Thread Mark Knecht
On 2/18/07, NoOp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02/18/2007 11:59 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi. Indeed you make a good point. I'm not sure what constitutes a correctly formatted XLS file but I suspect that this one is not since it is readable in a Linux text editor. Looks more like some form of

[users] Re: Why does Open Office open XLS files using Writer instead of Calc?

2007-02-18 Thread NoOp
On 02/18/2007 12:32 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: On 2/18/07, NoOp wrote: The file is a proper xls and opens just fine (2.1 linux) for me in calc. Your problem is your OS file associations. OK, my Gnome associations don't seem to do that for me so I added a specific scalc association. Now at

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-29 Thread John Meyer
Larry Gusaas wrote: the following is from http://www.mozilla.org/support/thunderbird/edit Knowing where your profile folder is stored can be useful if, for example, you want to make a backup of your personal data. On Windows XP/2000, the path is usually

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-29 Thread James Mckenzie
10:08 AM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) James Mckenzie wrote: You cannot scroll within the All Headers window. There is an extension to Thunderbird that allows for scrolling all headers. Header

[users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread Russell Butler
Robert Smits wrote: On Saturday 27 January 2007 04:57, CPHennessy wrote: Hi all, I'd like to remind everyone of a few simple points which may help new users get the most out of our answers: indicate that they should be treated specially. The practical difficulty I see with this helpful

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread James Mckenzie
From: Russell Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 28, 2007 5:27 PM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) Robert Smits wrote: On Saturday 27 January 2007 04:57, CPHennessy wrote: Hi all, I'd like to remind

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread Harold Fuchs
On Monday, January 29, 2007 12:51 AM [GMT+1=CET], James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Russell: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn on the Delivered-to: lines, you have to look at the entire header area. With This is just flat out nonsense. In

[users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread Russell Butler
Harold Fuchs wrote: On Monday, January 29, 2007 12:51 AM [GMT+1=CET], James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Russell: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn on the Delivered-to: lines, you have to look at the entire header area. With This is just

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread John Meyer
Russell Butler wrote: Harold Fuchs wrote: On Monday, January 29, 2007 12:51 AM [GMT+1=CET], James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Russell: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn on the Delivered-to: lines, you have to look at the entire header area.

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread James Mckenzie
@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) On Monday, January 29, 2007 12:51 AM [GMT+1=CET], James Mckenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Russell: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread James Mckenzie
From: John Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 28, 2007 6:49 PM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) And by the by, here's what it looks like when you do view all the headers in Thunderbird (OpenSuse 10.2

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread John Meyer
James Mckenzie wrote: not very user friendly, in my estimation. My point exactly. You cannot scroll within the All Headers window. I think this should be brought up on the Thunderbird list, not here, however. James McKenzie If you happen to know the way, I'll be more than happy

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread Larry Gusaas
James Mckenzie wrote: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn on the Delivered-to: lines, you have to look at the entire header area. With Earthlink, this can be more than the header buffer in Thunderbird can show and there is no method of scrolling You can

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread James Mckenzie
From: Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 28, 2007 9:29 PM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) James Mckenzie wrote: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread John Meyer
Larry Gusaas wrote: James Mckenzie wrote: This is my point with headers in Thunderbird. You cannot just turn on the Delivered-to: lines, you have to look at the entire header area. With Earthlink, this can be more than the header buffer in Thunderbird can show and there is no method of

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread James Mckenzie
Larry: Strangely, this does not work with my Thunderbird installation. Maybe I'm doing something incorrectly. James McKenzie -Original Message- From: Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 28, 2007 7:29 PM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread James Mckenzie
McKenzie -Original Message- From: John Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 28, 2007 7:43 PM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) Larry Gusaas wrote: James Mckenzie wrote: This is my point

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread Larry Gusaas
John Meyer wrote: Might you fill me in as to where this chrome folder is or should be? I can't find it, and I'm viewing all the hidden files in my system the following is from http://www.mozilla.org/support/thunderbird/edit Knowing where your profile folder is stored can be useful if, for

Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread Larry Gusaas
James Mckenzie wrote: Larry: Strangely, this does not work with my Thunderbird installation. Maybe I'm doing something incorrectly. James McKenzie I've been using Thunderbird for less than a Month. Check out http://kb.mozillazine.org/UserChrome.css The information I used is in one of

[users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list)

2007-01-28 Thread NoOp
James Mckenzie wrote: From: John Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 28, 2007 6:49 PM To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] Re: Why do some users get CC:ed (or The best way to answer questions on this list) And by the by, here's what it looks like when you do view all the headers

[users] Re: Why PDF? Was: Lost...totally

2006-11-05 Thread Henrik Sundberg
2006/11/5, arnold huzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Why is it that every time a users asks this question that he is advised to create a PDF-document from the OO-document. OO is capable of sending a document in the corresponding MSFT-format. PDF is a standard. It is also documented and open. And the

Re: [users] Re: Why PDF? Was: Lost...totally

2006-11-05 Thread arnold huzen
But the OP's question is not to create a document that is readable next year or in ten years time. The question is how can he send a Word-document to his readers, when he is using OO.o to create the newsletter. Everytime this question comes up in its many varieties, sending the document as

Re: [users] Re: Why PDF? Was: Lost...totally

2006-11-05 Thread Fred Moore
On Sunday 05 November 2006 4:33 pm, arnold huzen wrote: But the OP's question is not to create a document that is readable next year or in ten years time. The question is how can he send a Word-document to his readers, when he is using OO.o to create the newsletter. Everytime this question

Re: [users] Re: Why don't I receive my own emails? (Newsgroup interface)

2006-02-01 Thread Dan Lewis
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 01:40 am, Kira wrote: Chuck wrote: I know a lot of people use the email interface to the list, but I find the newsgroup interface provided by news.gmane.org to be much more efficient. I just see the headers and only download the body for the messages I'm really

Re: [users] Re: Why don't I receive my own emails?

2006-02-01 Thread Kira
Chuck wrote: I know a lot of people use the email interface to the list, but I find the newsgroup interface provided by news.gmane.org to be much more efficient. I just see the headers and only download the body for the messages I'm really interested in. Okay, I want to try this out, but I

Re: [users] Re: Why don't I receive my own emails? (Newsgroup interface)

2006-02-01 Thread Kira
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: You had better check gmail to see if the messages are being junked or denied. They are certainly showing up on the list. BTW your message from this morning is only 6 hours old and we are a volunteer group and not a paid Customer service group. I suggest some

Re: [users] Re: Why don't I receive my own emails?

2006-02-01 Thread Kira
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:48 -0500, Kira wrote: Chuck wrote: I know a lot of people use the email interface to the list, but I find the newsgroup interface provided by news.gmane.org to be much more efficient. I just see the headers and only download the body for

Re: [users] Re: Why don't I receive my own emails? (Newsgroup interface)

2006-02-01 Thread Matthew L. Avizinis
Kira wrote: G. Roderick Singleton wrote: You had better check gmail to see if the messages are being junked or denied. They are certainly showing up on the list. BTW your message from this morning is only 6 hours old and we are a volunteer group and not a paid Customer service group. I suggest

Re: [users] Re: Why don't I receive my own emails? (Newsgroup interface)

2006-01-31 Thread Kira
Chuck wrote: I know a lot of people use the email interface to the list, but I find the newsgroup interface provided by news.gmane.org to be much more efficient. I just see the headers and only download the body for the messages I'm really interested in. Thanks for the tip, Chuck. I will have

[users] Re: Why are my posts being identified as SPAM?

2005-09-19 Thread David Chapman
You are not alone - I' get theseas well - it doesn't bother me - perhaps everyone get's these On 9/19/05, Steve Kopischke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a great question to pose to whoever manages your incoming mail server. That is the source of the [***SPAM***] markings. SJK on

Re: [users] Re: Why are my posts being identified as SPAM?

2005-09-19 Thread Paul Smith
On 9/19/05, David Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are not alone - I' get theseas well - it doesn't bother me - perhaps everyone get's these To be honest, David, I find these postmaster e-mails annoying. Paul - To

Re: [users] Re: Why only a top ruler?

2005-03-25 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 25 March 2005 00:58, Russell Butler wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings; OOo-1.1.4 and OOo-1.1.79, linux-x86. How can I turn on a ruler on the left or right edge of the work area in the text composer, like the one across the top? Preferably with the same margin setting buttons

[users] Re: Why only a top ruler?

2005-03-24 Thread Russell Butler
Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings; OOo-1.1.4 and OOo-1.1.79, linux-x86. How can I turn on a ruler on the left or right edge of the work area in the text composer, like the one across the top? Preferably with the same margin setting buttons available on the top ruler? Hi Gene Have a look in Help

Re: [users] Re: why text is now horizontal on drawing line object?

2005-01-17 Thread Hackmiester
If I get this, then you were typing along in draw and a bar lined itself up with the text. It won't just let you rotate it back? sounds like a bug Try rotating it back, and if it rotates itself again, try just making a text box right on top of the bar. Don't know a permanent fix though. On