highly recommend it. But again, not the low MX. You'd be playing
with fire there.
--
Jon Trulson | A828 C19D A087 F20B DFED
mailto:j...@radscan.com | 67C9 6F32 31AB E647 B345
What can be asserted without evidence, can also be dismissed
without evidence
-net vs. a 'lone wolf'?
--
I drank what? | Jon Trulson
-Socrates | mailto:j...@radscan.com
| A828 C19D A087 F20B DFED
| 67C9 6F32 31AB E647 B345
a year ago. They were only
hitting on SPAM emails and pushing them into the FN range.
I second that - habeas stopped being useful a long time ago (IMO of
course :). Just zero them out.
--
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel!| mailto:j
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Anthony Peacock wrote:
I zeroed the scores for all of these rules about a year ago. They were
only hitting on SPAM emails and pushing them into the FN range.
I second that - habeas
blacklist. You can use this host for your fake high numbered MX. (Not a low
numbered MX though)
Que the spamvertising...
mail.yourdomain.com 10
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com 20
--
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel!| mailto:[EMAIL
the count there.
Has anyone done anything like this?
Any suggestions on how to do it?
Any other way to get the count?
man mailstats
--
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel!| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brocolli, hostage. -Unknown| #include
love my spamassassins :)
--
Happy cheese in fear | Jon Trulson
against oppressor, rebel!| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brocolli, hostage. -Unknown| #include std/disclaimer.h
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Luis HernĂ¡n Otegui wrote:
2007/9/12, Jon Trulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:07 PM Marc Perkel wrote:
The details are a little to complex for this forum ...
OK - had quite a few trolls here who seem
.
Is there any chance we can get a moderator on this, please? This is clearly not
a SA topic and I'm weary of insults, flames, and advertisements from Marc.
FWIW, +1
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
that was the reason your messages started tagging as spam.
One such list I remember was ordb.org.
Yes, ordb. Knew it was something like that. It may be true that
they posted something to a list - unfortunately, I was not
subscribed.
Nonetheless, we won't do that again.
--
Jon Trulson
/fail on RBL's. They can be
wrong, or go away.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
. Works great.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
stock onslaught. Without hard data available at the moment,
I'd guess we are seeing a less than a third of what we were
getting 24hrs ago.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
catching every one for me. There may be something else
going wrong with your setup - no idea what offhand though,
sorry.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
I would second that definitely. I only upped the bayes 95 and
99 rules to the pre3.0 scores - didn't mess with the others.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
from where I sit.
At home, I've also seen an increase - approx 150 a
day from around 80-90 previously.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
Jon Trulson said:
Hehe, that is an old spammer trick... Our secondary MX is
pretty much 100% spam.
I implemented greylisting on the secondary which reduced spam
through it by about 99% :) The secondary does not do spam
scanning, it's
which reduced spam
through it by about 99% :) The secondary does not do spam
scanning, it's simply store and forward. Greylisting really
helps in these cases.
--
Jon Trulson
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://radscan.com/~jon
#include std/disclaimer.h
No Kill I -Horta
they are being trapped...
--
Jon Trulsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID: 1A9A2B09, FP: C23F328A721264E7 B6188192EC733962
PGP keys at http://radscan.com/~jon/PGPKeys.txt
#include std/disclaimer.h
I am Nomad. -Nomad
onslaught we've been seeing today :)
HTH
Nigel
On Sat, 14 May 2005 16:35:37 +0400, Valery V. Bobrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello!
I upgraded to SpamAssassin version 3.0.2 from 2.64 and I noticed the amount
of spam messages has been increased!
What sort of problem?
Yours faithfully,
Valery
--
Jon
rulesets with v3 currently. At least on my
system, the memory issues had nothing to do with a custom ruleset or 3.
The --max-children=1 flag to spamd has 'solved' the issue for
me... Average child size is around 19-20MB, until 'the event' happens, at
which point it jumps to around 320MB.
--
Jon
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The --max-children=1 flag to spamd has 'solved' the issue for me...
Sorry, that should be '--max-conn-per-child=1'.
--
Jon Trulsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID
through 2.6x are
generally (a) those that match BAYES_99, which by itself in the
default configuration is no longer a large enough score to make me
happy, or
True. Some spam we get is soley BAYES_99. I've bumped it back up
to 5.2 (like in 2.6x).
--
Jon Trulsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jon Trulson wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote:
FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there
until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do
use AWL
on a whitelist
or bayes database maintenance event of some sort.
Better question.
Of all the folks seeing memory issues, are you using ok_languages in
your config somewhere? If not, please speak up as well.
I am using 'ok_locales en'.
--
Jon Trulsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID: 1A9A2B09, FP
more beefy host.
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:09:50 -0500, Doug Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had this problem till I set the max per child option to = 1
This caused spamd to kill the process used to scan every msg once it's
done.
Not the best answer I know but it keeps it in check
--
Jon Trulson
finishing a message). We do
use AWL and bayes.
Michael
--
Jon Trulsonmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ID: 1A9A2B09, FP: C23F328A721264E7 B6188192EC733962
PGP keys at http://radscan.com/~jon/PGPKeys.txt
#include std/disclaimer.h
I am Nomad. -Nomad
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote:
FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there
until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do
use AWL and bayes.
Is it possible to try and find
777C BF3F
Listening to: The Courtship of Birdy Numnum - The
Parapalegic-Homoerotic Episode
--
Shane Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Network/System Consultant
GPG KeyID: 777CBF3F
Key fingerprint: 254F B2AC 9939 C715 278C DA95 4109 9F69 777C BF3F
Listening to: The Styrenes - Cold Meat
--
Jon Trulson
instead of as a daemon. The load time was never terribly
bad, and they certainly can't leak.
See my response in a previous thread on this problem. For kicks,
try --max-conn-per-child=1 to spamd see and see if your machine will last
longer :) Mine did...
--
Jon Trulsonmailto:[EMAIL
30 matches
Mail list logo