On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 12:00:55 -0500, rtartar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some type of email mining where they send to a dictionary of names and
combos to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the best way to combat this?
Thanks
Don't allow catchall accounts on your servers. They are far more
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:59:52 -0700, Kelly Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to everyone who is replying here. Additional replies/comments
always appreciated.
What started me thinking about this is this non-intuitive but
mathematically valid paradox that Bookworm and others have noticed:
If
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:55:37 -0500, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:41:50PM -0500, Jason Frisvold wrote:
With respect to bayes_tok though, can that be trimmed at all with
minimal impact? 3GB is a tad large for the database, though I guess
that depends on
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:15:16 -0900, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 22:04, Bob Proulx wrote:
But in this case it is an example of poor form for the forward and
reverse dns not to match. If you are running a mail server this is
one of the things that should
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:43:12 +0200, Cristi Tudose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all .
I have some problem with subject rewriting.
I use qmail+vpopmail+clamav+spamassassin+qmail-scanner
This is my local.cf
## local.cf ###
# Add *SPAM* to the
Hi All,
After a fair bit of discussion on and off list,and a fair bit of
thought I've decided to change tack a little with stock spam.
As of this morning (GMT) I'm reporting all stock spam to the SEC (they
have a semi-dedicated address for it). I figure they'll either tell me
to quit, block me
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 11:16:30 -0600, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 10:59 am, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
After a fair bit of discussion on and off list,and a fair bit of
thought I've decided to change tack a little with stock spam.
As of this morning (GMT) I'm
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:03:54 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Wasn't there a stock image spam with TORA.TORA or something?
|
| AH HA! It is not a url, its a stock symbol!
|
| http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TORA.OB
Trading up 4.5%!
Geez...
At a rough guess that would be 'salt' money.
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:09:21 +0100, Giampaolo Tomassoni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evan Platt wrote:
At 07:44 AM 11/17/2006, you wrote:
I'm getting a bunch of spams this morning that have
TORA.08 spelled out with numbers like this.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:35:33 -0500, Peter H. Lemieux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Should be something like this in 50_scores.cf:
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 1.332 0 1.558
Just add score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.0 in your local.cf.
That said, I would NOT advise raising the
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 10:49:11 +0100, Cedric BUSCHINI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello List,
I d just like to have a confirmation about how to use sa-learn.
1 - create a directory containing spams (mails tagged as spam and mails not
tagged as spam but which are real spams)
2 - create a
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:43:12 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i new here..
can anyone know after i adding new domain for whitelist, how can i me it
active immediately with out stop and start the service.
because when restart , some spam mail already pass throught...
what is the differet
On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 12:36:08 +0100, Federico Giannici
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Anders Norrbring wrote:
I have a slight problem.. I thought I'd finally start using sa-learn
to train the Bayes, the catch is that I have Cyrus and its mailboxes
on another server.. I
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:28:18 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
wrote:
Nigel Frankcom writes:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:47:31 -0500, Dylan Bouterse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 80_additional.cf file I have a list of TVD* rules that are not
explained on the http://spamassassin.apache.org
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:31:26 +, Markus Braun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like also to report the spams, but i dont wont get so much spams as
i can see there.
This is probably because you have an unconditional
warn message = X-Spam-Report: $spam_report
in your Exim configuration -
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:03:14 -0500, Debbie D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last week I made some changes to my rules and I performed
-- lint
which showed no errors..
Yesterday AM there was a HUGE influx of spam and I SSH'd in when I saw the
loads jumping up.
The first thing I did after verifying I
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:53:38 +0530, Dhawal Doshy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 12:03:14 -0500, Debbie D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last week I made some changes to my rules and I performed
-- lint
which showed no errors..
Yesterday AM there was a HUGE
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 12:00:50 -0700, Philip Prindeville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I'm running FC3 on an AMD64 platform for my mail server,
and I had last installed SpamAssassin 3.1.5. Well, I grabbed the
tarball for 3.1.7, and did a rpmbuild -tb ... of the tarball.
Worked fine.
Then I tried
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:56:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dobrý den,
24. ríjna 2006, 8:05:06, napsal jste:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list:
So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain?
I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users.
Afterall, if you
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:58:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It? possible on perl version 5.8.1 install the Net::DNS?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CPAN is the usual way to do it, tho iirc that has caused some problems
(it did here). I got round it by installing through yum (yum
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:56:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dobrý den,
24. ríjna 2006, 8:05:06, napsal jste:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list:
So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain?
I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users.
Afterall, if you
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 01:47:31 -0500, Dylan Bouterse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the 80_additional.cf file I have a list of TVD* rules that are not
explained on the http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_1_x.html page
(I'm running SA 3.1.7 and up to date with sa-update). Are these new
rules added to
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:19:40 +0100, Fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I have a small site with some users and a sendmail mailing lists that contain
all users. This mailing list is used almost exclusively by internal users,
sending mail to all other users.
Unfortunately, I receive a lot of spam
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:33:54 -0400, Shaun T. Erickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/29/06, Leander Koornneef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are using spamassassin 3.1, you can use sa-update to get the SARE
rulesets from the channel provided by http://saupdates.openprotect.com/.
This negates
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:25:37 -0700, Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do these guys all get on the same kick at the same time?
Or is it really ONE spammer who just got fired?
Do they hold meetings about what topics to use next month
or what?
I'd lay odds that it is either one
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:25:37 -0700, Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where do these guys all get on the same kick at the same time?
Or is it really ONE spammer who just got fired?
Do they hold meetings about what topics to use next month
or what?
I'd lay odds that it is either one
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:42:58 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
wrote:
Hey --
just to turn the tables for a bit ;), I've recently been considering a
problem and a possible solution, and could do with SpamAssassin users'
advice.
These days, I've been forced to use SBL/XBL as an upfront
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:24:55 +1000, Christopher Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be great to be able to
present some metrics on total mail statistics and then compare what
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 11:13:31 -0400, Chris Santerre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:41 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Psst!
Chris Santerre wrote:
Just curious,
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:18:18 -0700, Jo Rhett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I've stated several times before, spamassassin *DOES* run.
Always. It's just whether or not it's doing anything useful. When it
can't talk to the sockets, it's dead in the water.
Frank Bures wrote:
.
Nigel.
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:46:31 -0700, Jo Rhett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:18:18 -0700, Jo Rhett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I've stated several times before, spamassassin *DOES* run.
Always. It's just whether or not it's doing anything
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:18:27 -0700, Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Any suggestion to spread a spamtrap e-mail address?
Subscribe it to some mailing lists. Make a few posts, preferably using
the address in your signature. Unsubscribe it. Then wait for spammers
to
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:13:53 +1300, Jason Haar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a small continual number of Asian spam coming in with
message sizes in the 400-500Kbyte range.
Obviously the default 250K size in spamc is too small and these drop
through the defenses.
Upping it to 600K
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:32:07 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
back a few years, some mail servers (e.g. qmail) disabled the verify command
to avoid address probing - and as a consequence would send bounces.
Nowadays, the majority of mail servers (apart from aol :) rejects unknown
users with a 5xx
Hi,
I got this error today...
***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin/70_sare_stocks.cf
/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/70_sare_stocks.cf.2; mv -f
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:07:22 +0200, Matthias Haegele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom schrieb:
Hi,
I got this error today...
***WARNING***: spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollback command is: mv -f /etc/mail/spamassassin
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:11:58 +0200, Noc Phibee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i want change my mail server, actually, i use SpamAssassin 3.0.4
I want put the latest version
Can i export from old server the bayes database and import it into the new ?
Thanks bye
You should be able to do a MySQL
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:11:09 +0200, Matthias Haegele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Accidently (or foolishly) i didnt deactivitate wrong rules in config
of RulesDuJour [1]. from site: rulesemporium [2].
Now i have some rules in my /etc/spamassassin/ not for my SA-Version [3]
namely: the
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:36:17 -0700 (PDT), John D. Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote:
I would like to add headers X-Spam-Status, X-Spam-Level, X-Spam-Flag to
every e-mail tested
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:18:55 -0700 (PDT), e2rd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
report_safe 0 doesn't help.
I have also:
always_add_headers 1
spam_level_stars 1
always_add_report 1
Do you have any other idea?
Best regards,
e2rd
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote:
I would
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:13:28 -0400, David Cary Hart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:28:14 -0800, John Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opined:
The Register is running an article saying spam is back up to 81% of
all email traffic due to newer versions of the Mocbot worm.
If anything,
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:25:40 -0700 (PDT), John D. Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, jdow wrote:
Hm, I have a suspicion that the spam is being targeted quite
differently then. Until the end of June I used to get about 250 to
300 spams a day. I am down to 90 to 150 per day now.
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 01:10:25 -0800, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:03, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:25:40 -0700 (PDT), John D. Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, jdow wrote:
Hm, I have a suspicion that the spam is being
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 04:22:07 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 01:10:25 -0800, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 03 September 2006 01:03, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:25:40 -0700 (PDT), John D. Hardin
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:28:14 -0800, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Register is running an article saying spam is back up to 81% of all
email traffic due to newer versions of the Mocbot worm.
If anything, my traffic has been less of late, and almost non-existant
since in installed
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 06:15:28 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 02:28:14 -0800, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Register is running an article saying spam is back up to 81% of all
email traffic due to newer versions
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:43:36 +0200, Anders Norrbring
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get IO::Socket::INET6 to install since I actually use
IPv6.. But so far no luck, and I haven't found any cure when Googling
around on the subject either.
Anyone on the list who can help out? The output
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:07:50 +0200, Jürgen Ladstätter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
x-virus header is now shown, but it doesnt drop the file. i think it would
be better, because outlook doesnt show any warning, header isnt rewritten,
file isnt dropped. so its still unsecure :-/
Mit freundlichen
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:07:50 +0200, Jürgen Ladstätter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
x-virus header is now shown, but it doesnt drop the file. i think it would
be better, because outlook doesnt show any warning, header isnt rewritten,
file isnt dropped. so its still unsecure :-/
Mit freundlichen
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:23:47 +0200, Jürgen Ladstätter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
it does the following when it finds a virus:
} elsif($code eq 'FOUND') {
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg(ClamAV: Detected virus: $virus);
$header = Yes ($virus);
$isspam = 1;
so it adds a flag for SA
Ahh
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:21:16 +0700, Beast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
From some (spam) mail which not caught by SA, it seems that bayes is
not applied to this mail.
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 1.7 SARE_SPEC_ROLEX Rolex watch spam
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:52:33 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Beast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
From: Beast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
From some (spam) mail which not caught by SA, it seems that bayes is
not applied to this mail.
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:28:21 +0700, Beast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I will turn on auto leaarn mostly because I need to feed more HAM to SA
(so far I only feed ham for any false positive which is very low daily
and i think that is not good enough for SA
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:49:16 +0300, Halid Faith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I use spamassassin3.1 with simscan1.2 on qmail.
I want my mailserver to deny some messages which are spam using sa-learn. So I
typed as below;
sa-learn --spam /path/badmails/
Learned tokens from 6 message(s) (6
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:04:06 -0400, Bill Horne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:29:36PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All-numeric domains are popular in China because they are easier for
people to deal with than alphabetic domains. For
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all!
Anyone happen to know the memory requirements of SpamAssassin? I
have
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:10:59 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nigel Frankcom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:52:58 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:46:05 -0700
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Lay [EMAIL
I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was possible
to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked that all
tables are the same type? MyISAM or Inno? If they are all the same,
I'd be inclined to pull it down, rebuild from the SA supplied SQL and
retrain.
Did you
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:02:04 +0100, Hamish Marson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was
possible to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked
that all tables
On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:08:52 +0100, Hamish Marson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I'm not sure what you've done there, I didn't realise it was
possible to mix collation types in the same table. Have you checked
that all tables
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 08:21:41 +0100, Duncan Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 August 2006 00:02, wrote:
| 2250 0733.com
Here are my numbers from last week:
5006 0451.com
3845 53.com
Not seeing anywhere near as high, but this is only on my personal server:
440733.com
I had similar problems on CentOS 32 64; I ended up installing the
Net::Ident with yum instead (off the dag repo), that worked ok...
yum install perl-Net-Ident.noarch
The INET6 can be installed the same way, though I don't think it's
critical to have it in.
HTH
Nigel
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:38:56 +0100, Ben Wylie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question for those of you who have large databases of spam and ham to
check, do genuine emails come from the domain 0451.com or whether it is
genuinely just spam?
I get a lot of spam claiming to be from emails on this
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:08:45 +0200, Arik Raffael Funke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
how to I get spamd/spamc to always add the spamassassin report headers?
I.e. also to ham messages...
I have the following in my local.cf and user_pref.cf but to no apparent use:
use_auto_whitelist 0
use_bayes
Hi All,
I ran sa-update across several Centos 64 32 bit machines here
yesterday and today and received the following error...
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue
anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering if I should be
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:06:31 -0400, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:19:44AM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
channel: attempt to rm channel pre file failed, attempting to continue
anyway at /usr/bin/sa-update line 694
--lint -D shows no errors, just wondering
I'll put on my flameproof underwear for this
There's been a huge amount of crossfire on these/this subject, but I
don't see how it has anything to do with SA; or am I missing the
point?
Different protocols, yet another level of policing, but nothing about
the fact that SA does a damned fine
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 05:37:32 -0700, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why not just eliminate the SMTP protocol for end users and keep SMTP as
a server to server protocol and have users send theit email to the
server by extending POP/IMAP to send email. It created an authenticated
connection
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 05:53:17 -0700, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 05:37:32 -0700, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why not just eliminate the SMTP protocol for end users and keep SMTP as
a server to server protocol and have users
I had a similar problem recently, after 5 years on the same static
Business IP it suddenly appeared in SORBS. In true Murphy's law
fashion the first I knew of it was about 8PM on a Saturday night, when
a message to this list bounced with reference to SORBS.
After a few days dickering with my ISP
Hi,
The sa-learn instruction trains the bayes database; without it bayes
will not tag any messages. You need to do the training with at least
200 spam and 200 ham. Be very careful that the messages in each are
correct, so no spam in the ham folder.
There are options to learn from the mbox format
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:25:23 +0100, Ben Wylie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am running SpamAssassin 3.1.2 on Windows 2003 Server.
I have written a meta rule and i want it to only hit if it hits the
first rule AND one of the three in brackets.
This syntax doesn't seem to work as it hits when it hits
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:12:14 +0100, Ben Wylie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.2 on Windows 2003 Server.
Is there any way for me to change the DNS timeout period?
Is there a way for me to increase debugging info on DNSBL tests?
When for some reason, if all DNS tests work,
They have a nice feedback link :-
http://www.accessintel.com/feedback.htm
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:00:52 -0800, John Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 21:42, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, John Andersen wrote:
On Friday 21 July 2006 18:03, John D. Hardin
Hi,
I'm looking at the feasibility of using all_spam_to for my local
abuse@ addresses.
Since abuse@ is intended as reporting mechanism about local abusers I
don't want mail sent to the local abuse addresses scanned/binned by
SA.
Am I opening myself up to problems?
Is there a better way to do
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:37:29 + (UTC), martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just wonder, how can make sa-learn/spamassassin to unlearn a message? thx
jdow jdow at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nigel Frankcom nigel at blue-canoe.net writes:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:37:29 + (UTC), martin
martinnitram at excite.com wrote
Do you have sql whitelist and user prefs enabled?
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:18:12 +0200, Martin Schiøtz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am using spamassassin-3.1.3 with bayes_pg.sql. Everything is working
fine but in maillog it looks like spamassassin is making the bayes
lookup 3 times for each
Previous message aside, either the user name is wrong or the db for
that user is empty
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:18:12 +0200, Martin Schiøtz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am using spamassassin-3.1.3 with bayes_pg.sql. Everything is working
fine but in maillog it looks like spamassassin is making
I'd have said the tools were the spammers and the image spams their
implements - but that'd just be semantics :-}
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:08:51 -0700, Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
marketing.. or should I expect a huge deluge of Image spam this weekend
Maybe. Who knows.
Image spam has
I think you'll need to take those info out of you smtp/MTA logs
We do similar here using an AWK script which goes on to tally ham/spam
and various other stats.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:38:22 -0700 (PDT), Pezhman Lali
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
in my /var/log/maillog, foreach spam checking, there
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:45:07 +1000, Leigh Sharpe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it looks like I have to reset my Bayes and re-train it. I want to do
it properly this time. I will be making sure I personally review every
message that our users put into the spam folder first, to make sure they
haven't
Hi,
Did you do:
'razor-admin -discover'
'razor-admin -register'
After installing razor?
KR
Nigel
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 10:58:53 +0200, numE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i installed spamassassin and razor2 via cpan.
but i get this message, when running spamassassin --lint
---
[729] dbg:
Hi,
Did you enable:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre file?
KR
Nigel
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 09:51:50 -0400, Screaming Eagle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I know I installed razor, because I just ran a razor-report.
razor-report -v
Razor
Hi,
We use a Win32 mail server that passes mail over to a nix SA box; one
thing that's been noted is that win can lock the file on occasion and
cause SA to fail. It seems windows file locks have much to answer for.
One possible culprit is the index server; this may or may not apply to
you.
For all my comments earlier, SA with Razor, Pyzor DCC work well,;
far better since the SA rig was moved to nix. I use CentOS FC3/4
here. The net results are most agreeable. I hit maybe 1 - 5 FP/FN a
week - which is pretty good on the local setup.
All things considered I'm most happy.
I've just
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:17:51 -0700, Harris, Jason \(DIS\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wanting to know many times per year do SA admins have to retrain ?
Our setup sends mail to SA client for a score, then depending on score
stores a backup of the mail in spam/ham mail folders for later
Hi All,
Prior to the recent update for the stocks rule on RDJ I hardly got any
stock spam through. Since the update it seems they all get through
now. Can we have the old rule back?
Kind regards
Nigel
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:23:23 -0400, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:07:26PM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
If you find way of load balancing the MySQL db's I'd be very
interested in hearing how.
I'm not a DBA, but doesn't MySQL support clustering which would
regards
Nigel
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:41:36 -0400, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
This may be a daft question, if so, apologies in advance; but, do you
train these spam into sa?
Nope, been down the Bayes road a few times and the load on the server
never justified the spam
Hi,
I've run in 3.1.2 on a test server before letting it loose live.
When running --lint -D I get the following output:
info: config: can not determine userstate dir
warn: config: could not find userprefs file
My SPAMDOPTIONS are set as:
SPAMDOPTIONS=-d -c -m5 -H -i0.0.0.0 -A192.168.2. -q -x
suggestions.
Kind regards
Nigel
On Wed, 31 May 2006 18:39:10 +0100, Nigel Frankcom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've run in 3.1.2 on a test server before letting it loose live.
When running --lint -D I get the following output:
info: config: can not determine userstate dir
warn: config: could
On the plus side the manual fix is pretty simple and now it's in the
lists it should make it a little easier for others to find a solution.
I wouldn't beat yourself up too much, if it was perfect every time
where would the entertainment value be? ;-)
KR
Nigel
On Wed, 31 May 2006 17:16:56
This perhaps?
http://www.willowstarcom.co.uk/index.php/p83_starscan_antivirus_and_spam_e_mail_detection.html
KR
Nigel
On Tue, 30 May 2006 00:01:31 -0700, Loren Wilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I happened to notice the following headers in a mail message I received:
X-StarScan-Version:
Considering the list in question, I'd have thought headers were a key
source of interest - I guess it's a Lookout user
On Thu, 25 May 2006 10:38:34 -0700, Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Jackson wrote:
It's odd... I think it's been 7 or 8 years since I used a mailing list
where
Probably need a couple of extra wives to explain it to you ;-D
On Thu, 18 May 2006 19:30:56 -0400, Rick Macdougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Evan Platt wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2006 4:25 pm, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Our LDS Family ?
Strange.
LDS = Latter Day Saints (Mormons).
Ja, I know
One gets the idea that many in this thread have had little experience
of litigation. I don't know about the US, but in the UK, you're
talking *many* months and much paperwork. That being said. I'm so up
for suing the SOB's ... hit em where it hurts.
A small addendum, once a private prosecution
On Fri, 12 May 2006 11:47:33 -0700, jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bret Miller wrote:
Seems spammers have taken up to doing what many of us have in posting
e-mail addresses, putting [dot] instead of the . in the URL and telling
people to replace it like this:
Just a mild - un-warlike comment, but - there are a few of us out here
that use win-based servers; I freely admit win have a skewed idea of
dates, but that doesn't change the problem.
Craig kindly wrote an awk that did the date conversion for my (squid)
logs so that I can get some sanity from my
201 - 300 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
