Re: per-user bayes

micah anderson wrote: Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes database, and most users will

Re: per-user bayes

hg user skrev den 2020-12-09 08:57: I believe that a SA plugin (like bayes) is able to know the envelope MAIL FROM and RCPT TO values... is it correct? If it is possible we "just" have to modify the bayes plugin provide this patch first and ask later :=) bayes does not fokus on specifik header

Re: per-user bayes

user identifier. > Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY > balloon the size of your Bayes database, and most users will idle below the > learning thresholds for quite a long time. > Can you give an idea of the size calculation? I'm want

Re: per-user bayes

On 2020-12-09 4:41 am, @lbutlr wrote: > On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > >> Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in > each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > Kris Deugau writes: >> There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields >> in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full >> per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY bal

Re: per-user bayes

t; > Kris Deugau writes: > > > >> There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the > >> fields > >> in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full > >> per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of

Re: per-user bayes

micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes

Re: per-user bayes

Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields > in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full > per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your > Bayes database, and most users will id

Re: per-user bayes

set the user to the local Unix username when called without -u). There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes database

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 08:36, Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic > many have pondered over. Forgot to fix the reply to on this list for some reason. Fixed now. > Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don'

Re: per-user bayes

Hi Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic many have pondered over. Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that 'bayes user' is being set on a per recipient base. On the email platform there is ONE config file for

Re: per-user bayes

Hi > This may help > > I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global' database on your mail platf

Re: per-user bayes

On 07 Dec 2020, at 13:56, micah anderson wrote: > A per-user setup would let each user do their own thing, but I don't see > how I can do that because our system doesn't have individual system > users and I don't see that there are options in the bayes sql > confi

per-user bayes

Hi all, I've got a site-wide bayes mysql setup. It keeps getting poisoned quickly, because the user patterns are far too divergent from each other. One person's spam is another person's ham, nobody is happy. A per-user setup would let each user do their own thing, but I don

Re: Per-user prefs and rules

Alex skrev den 2020-11-10 20:30: It also looks like there's "whitelist_from", but no "whitelist_auth"? Or "blacklist_from"? How much work would it be to add it to the database then configure SA to actually look for it? this can be done in sql spamassassin, read the docs in amavisd only whitel

Re: Per-user prefs and rules

> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UsingSQL > > create pr user rules, set the scores default to 0 > > in sql, then change scorees pr user, easy :=) > > and amavisd have sa_userprefs maps to sa_user, it's just not that easy to > make work as intended This is kind of what I

Re: Per-user prefs and rules

Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2020-11-09 14:43: no, amavis processes all mail under single user, usually "amavis". user prefs in sql is still supported in spamassassin even for system users in the host and amavisd have usermaps to sa_users, so its all supported but the gaviat is more th

Re: Per-user prefs and rules

Alex skrev den 2020-11-09 14:37: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UsingSQL create pr user rules, set the scores default to 0 in sql, then change scorees pr user, easy :=) and amavisd have sa_userprefs maps to sa_user, its just not that easy to make work as intended

Re: Per-user prefs and rules

On 09.11.20 08:37, Alex wrote: I'm aware of the ability to store user prefs in mysql, like whether to use bayes or razor, but is it possible to have rules on a per-user basis with SA 3.4.4 and amavis? no, amavis processes all mail under single user, usually "amavis". you prob

Per-user prefs and rules

Hi, I'm aware of the ability to store user prefs in mysql, like whether to use bayes or razor, but is it possible to have rules on a per-user basis with SA 3.4.4 and amavis? I realize I could write a meta rule that combines a rule with a recipient address, for example, but ideally I'

Re: bayes_toks per user and per site

On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:35:35 +0200 nobswolf wrote: > I use SA for quite a while and it worked very well until it stopped > auto-learning. I checked the configuration and found out I have the > files bayes_toks and bayes_seen at three locations: > > 1) /home/spamd/ > > 2) /home/nobs/   (my person

bayes_toks per user and per site

I use SA for quite a while and it worked very well until it stopped auto-learning. I checked the configuration and found out I have the files bayes_toks and bayes_seen at three locations: 1) /home/spamd/ 2) /home/nobs/   (my personal home) 3) /var/lib/spamassassin/ As it seems the postfix uses

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

On 2017-01-06 16:02, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 1/6/2017 7:07 AM, R wrote: OPTIONS="-u spamass-milter -x -e mydomain.com -i 127.0.0.1" Jan 6 11:23:39 mail spamd[18251]: spamd: using default config for spamass-milter: /var/vmail///.spamassassin/user_prefs Jan 6 11:23:39 mail spamd[18251]: spamd:

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:02:20 -0500 Bowie Bailey wrote: > I don't use spamass-milter, but I would guess that the -x option may > require some extra configuration. > According to the man page it uses sendmail -bv to perform the translation. It also has a "Recipient processing" debug flag.

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

On 1/6/2017 11:06 AM, R wrote: thank you for highlighting that... I've always tried to fix this trying to make spamassassin "alias aware". I'll try instead to just pass the intended mailbox name to spamc. Excluding the spamassassin word from my online researches finally I've started finding p

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

On 01/06/2017 05:06 PM, R wrote: Perhaps I just need to remove/replace spamass-milter, If you're using Postfix I can recommend Fuglu (https://fuglu.org) in pre queue mode. lightweight, very well documented and has been rock solid. Axb

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

Hi Kevin, thank you for highlighting that... I've always tried to fix this trying to make spamassassin "alias aware". I'll try instead to just pass the intended mailbox name to spamc. Excluding the spamassassin word from my online researches finally I've started finding people with the same

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

On 1/6/2017 7:07 AM, R wrote: Hello all, I'm running a mail server with this setup: Debian based postfix + spamassassin (called using spamass-milter) and I have a config problem I cannot fix by myself... All the users are virtual users (using a sql database) and both delivery and per

Re: Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

On 1/6/2017 7:07 AM, R wrote: Hello all, I'm running a mail server with this setup: Debian based postfix + spamassassin (called using spamass-milter) and I have a config problem I cannot fix by myself... SpamAss-milter, known as the glue, is not an Apache SpamAssassin product. Someone here

Spamd per-user prefs with aliases

Hello all, I'm running a mail server with this setup: Debian based postfix + spamassassin (called using spamass-milter) and I have a config problem I cannot fix by myself... All the users are virtual users (using a sql database) and both delivery and per-user spamassassin prefs/bayes are wo

Re: AWL on per-user basis

Good day! You were completely right: after I added '-u debian-spamd' (this user was automatically created at the time of package installation) to the spamd start string in the /etc/default/spamassassin AWL started working right as expected. The database is now filled almost as expected: *

Re: AWL on per-user basis

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:07:36 +0300 ? wrote: > No, spamd is running as user "root", so I don't have the "-u" key > anywhere in the smapd configs. I'm sorry for not making this clear > enough. > > What I meant to say is that when I send or receive a message through > my Exim (on the r

Re: AWL on per-user basis

ith AWL, as username in the AWL table is set to "nobody". Looking forward to your reply, Boris On 14 January 2016 at 17:49, RW wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:21:44 +0300 > ? wrote: > > > I'm using Spamassassin 3.4.0 on Debian Jessie and trying to se

Re: AWL on per-user basis

On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:21:44 +0300 ? wrote: > I'm using Spamassassin 3.4.0 on Debian Jessie and trying to set up AWL > stored in SQL on a per-user basis. My setup is as follows: > > 1) Spamassassin is run as 'spamd' on behalf of user root, the options

AWL on per-user basis

I'm using Spamassassin 3.4.0 on Debian Jessie and trying to set up AWL stored in SQL on a per-user basis. My setup is as follows: 1) Spamassassin is run as 'spamd' on behalf of user root, the options string is as follows: OPTIONS="-D --create-prefs -x -q -Q --max-children 5

SQL Preferences and file-based per-user bayes

Is there any way to use both an SQL configuration for virtual user preferences, but at the same time use file-based bayes databases for virtual users? The spamd man page for the "-virtual-config-dir" option states: "Note that this requires that -x is used, and cannot be comb

Re: Global and per-user bayesian databases

Dnia 2012-04-27, pią o godzinie 13:08 +0100, RW pisze: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:57:33 +0200 > Robert Wysocki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Our old environment used per-user bayesian databases, but now we've > > decided to use one that is site-wide. > >

Re: Global and per-user bayesian databases

On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:57:33 +0200 Robert Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > Our old environment used per-user bayesian databases, but now we've > decided to use one that is site-wide. > > The thing is that some users managed to train their bayes filters > quite well and

Re: Global and per-user bayesian databases

Den 2012-04-27 12:57, Robert Wysocki skrev: Our old environment used per-user bayesian databases, but now we've decided to use one that is site-wide. ok The thing is that some users managed to train their bayes filters quite well and we don't want to loose it. hope thay have th

Global and per-user bayesian databases

Hi, Our old environment used per-user bayesian databases, but now we've decided to use one that is site-wide. The thing is that some users managed to train their bayes filters quite well and we don't want to loose it. So is it possible to configure spamassassin to use both global an

Re: Global and per-user bayes in sql

More data about my enviroment Spamassassin: 3.3.2 OS: CentOS 5 x86 How is SA invoqued: qmail-scanner 2.10 Any idea? Regards Maria - Original Message - From: Maria Arrea Sent: 02/02/12 10:04 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Global and per-user bayes in sql Hello

Global and per-user bayes in sql

Hello Is it posible to use global & per-user bayes in sql? The intented usage should be the following mail<--->spamassassin<--->generic_rules<--->per-user-rules-sql<--->global_bayes_sql<--->per_user_bayes Is this setup possible? I have been playing with

Re: Postfix, spamc per-user, with aliases?

Gerald Turner writes: > Looks like Postfix alias lookup is only handled by local(8) and not > something accessible to pipe(8). The only foreseeable option is to > duplicate the lookup in a shell script, which isn't pretty because I'm > using a combination of aliases db and LDAP. > > Anyone have

Postfix, spamc per-user, with aliases?

Hello, I'm using a Postfix after-queue configuration very close to what is documented on the SpamAssassin wiki[1]. Works great with mail where localpart matches a user, but doesn't work so great for aliases. I'm using the spamc -u argument so that each user has their own prefs, bayes, awl, etc.,

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: >>> Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the >>> aliases database? >> Positive. The mail is delivered to the right place, it just

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:24:18 -0500 David King wrote: > >> I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user > >> 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: > > Two obvious things to check: > > 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? > > Posit

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

>> I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user >> 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: > Two obvious things to check: > 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? Positive. The mail is delivered to the right place, it just doesn't get

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 00:39 -0500, David King wrote: > I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user > 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: > Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? 2) As there is more t

Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

rs to not be able to find the user 'alias1' (when it should be looking for the user 'user1'). This makes the suid fail which makes the per-user bayes database for 'user1' not useable when receiving mail sent to 'alias1'. The log lines look like:

RE: Tracking recipient counts on a per user basis

Thanks Mark and Benny! I will look into these solutions today. -Ryan -Original Message- Indeed, the recipients of a message are passed from MTA to MTA in the SMTP 'envelope' and not in the mail header section. The To and Cc mail header fields may or may not bear any relationship with the

Re: Tracking recipient counts on a per user basis

o into quarantine until an admin > releases it. Thing is, I'm not sure where to begin... > > Breaking this down into bite-size chunks I see the following ahead of me: > > 1. Track the number of recipients that are sent mail on a 24-hour per-user > basis. 2. If the number of

Re: Tracking recipient counts on a per user basis

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:54:08 -0400, "Wendel, Ryan" wrote: > I am trying to implement an anti-phishing strategy and was hoping some of > you could point me in the right direction. start with policyd v2 (http://www.policyd.org/) take virus later -- Benny Pedersen

Tracking recipient counts on a per user basis

admin releases it. Thing is, I'm not sure where to begin... Breaking this down into bite-size chunks I see the following ahead of me: 1. Track the number of recipients that are sent mail on a 24-hour per-user basis. 2. If the number of outgoing email transmissions for a user crosses

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

On 31.03.09 14:40, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: > Is there a user preference to disable SPF in SA for some users and enable > for others? why? requiring that is an indication of something being broken. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to recei

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

should be able to modify scores at a user level by enabling user >>> rules >>> in local.cf: >>> >>> allow_user_rules 1 >>> >>> By default it is turned off. >> >> You do NOT need that to adjust scores in per user user_prefs files. Yo

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

1 By default it is turned off. You do NOT need that to adjust scores in per user user_prefs files. You will need that only, if you want to allow users to define new rules. Any user always can set the score. Did not realize that. Just score all the SPF rules at zero.

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

gt; > By default it is turned off. You do NOT need that to adjust scores in per user user_prefs files. You will need that only, if you want to allow users to define new rules. Any user always can set the score. > > > Just score all the SPF rules at zero. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#item_allow_user_rules Ricardo - Original Message - From: "RW" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:26 PM Subject: Re: SPF plugin per-user? On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:40:45 -0700 "Ricardo Kleemann" wrote: Hi, Is there a user preference to disabl

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

On 31-Mar-2009, at 16:35, Ricardo Kleemann wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:40:45 -0700 "Ricardo Kleemann" wrote: Is there a user preference to disable SPF in SA for some users and enable for others? Just score all the SPF rules at zero. This can be done for a particular user? 1) don't to

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

This can be done for a particular user? Ricardo - Original Message - From: "RW" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:26 PM Subject: Re: SPF plugin per-user? On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:40:45 -0700 "Ricardo Kleemann" wrote: Hi, Is there a user preference to disabl

Re: SPF plugin per-user?

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:40:45 -0700 "Ricardo Kleemann" wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a user preference to disable SPF in SA for some users and > enable for others? Just score all the SPF rules at zero.

SPF plugin per-user?

Hi, Is there a user preference to disable SPF in SA for some users and enable for others? Thanks Ricardo

Re: Per-user preferences directory

Christian Gregoire wrote: > Hello, > > Is there any alternative to the %u, %l or %d options to the > virtual-config-dir option ? I have 12 000 mailboxes, that is, as many entries > in only one directory ... > SQL http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/branches/3.2/sql/README

Per-user preferences directory

Hello, Is there any alternative to the %u, %l or %d options to the virtual-config-dir option ? I have 12 000 mailboxes, that is, as many entries in only one directory ... Thanks. Christian

Re: Spamassassin per user blacklisting is not working

27;t touch that -- I'm not sure if it'll do per-user prefs or not. You may want to look for help on the qmail-scanner-general list or wait a few hours for someone here to help (or point you at that list). Agreed, however, the important point is: Spamd does not, and will not attempt

Re: Spamassassin per user blacklisting is not working

ot sure if it'll do per-user prefs or not. You may want to look for help on the qmail-scanner-general list or wait a few hours for someone here to help (or point you at that list). Daryl

Re: Spamassassin per user blacklisting is not working

this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-per-user-blacklisting-is-not-working-tp15752610p15752830.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Spamassassin per user blacklisting is not working

On 29/02/2008 12:52 AM, devi_sreem wrote: > Here it says username='qscand' I am not sure why spamd is not transferring > the email account as the username to variable _USERNAME_ Are you calling spamc with a "-u username" parameter? Daryl

Spamassassin per user blacklisting is not working

server Here it says username='qscand' I am not sure why spamd is not transferring the email account as the username to variable _USERNAME_ Please suggest me on this. Sincerely, Sreedevi. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-per-user-blacklisting-is-n

Multiple per user?

Hi, I am using SA from amavis-new, with postfix, in before-queue configuration, with per user scores (provided by amavis) I also want to implement per user bayes. But since SA takes only a single user name, amavis-new is not able to implement per-user bayes. Is it a good idea for SA to take

Re: Per-User required_score

On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:20:26 +0100 Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > > Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really > > do per-user configs. > > > > "spamc -u" will work, if there's o

Re: Per-User required_score

Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do > per-user configs. > > "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with > multiple users, such as when there are several recipients for a sing

Re: Per-User required_score

{recipient} If your concern is to have per-user SQL-based spam scores, but want to keep SpamAssassin at the MTA level, and since you are already using amavisd-new - why not let amavisd call SA directly, and provide its SQL (or LDAP) lookups functionality. This allows SpamAssassin to only be invoked o

Re: Per-User required_score

On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do per-user > configs. > > "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with multiple > users, such as when there are several

Re: Per-User required_score

Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do per-user configs. "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with multiple users, such as when there are several recipients for a single message, unless you can get the MTA to

Re: Per-User required_score

David.Sharpe wrote: > Within postfix/master.cf I have the following lines : > > smtp inet n - - - - smtpd > -o content_filter=spamassassin > > > This pushes mail through the following lines : > > spamassassin unix - n n - - p

Re: Per-User required_score

ef WHERE username >> = 'nobody' OR username = '$GLOBAL' OR username = CONCAT('%',NULL) >> ORDER BY username ASC / >> -------- > > how do you run spamassassin? > > > -

Re: Per-User required_score

David.Sharpe wrote: Hi, I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis. I have read the document http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and have the tests working OKAY. /executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref WHERE

Per-User required_score

uting SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref WHERE username = 'nobody' OR username = '$GLOBAL' OR username = CONCAT('%',NULL) ORDER BY username ASC -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Per-User-required_score-tp14664875p14664875.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Bayes per user

Hi, I have spamassasin version 3.2.3 running on Perl version 5.8.8 operating system FreeBSD, working with user on Vpopmail. I have to configure the database bayes to use a bank for each user and the bank is in the user's home in Vpopmail. Also need a script to run the sa-learn in the home of ea

Re: Bayes - one database per user or one for everybody?

icult because amavis doesn't extract or pass user information to SA in any case, and it would presumably mean running spamc in procmailrc... Is there any way of checking two dbs, one global and one per-user? A lot of questions, and any pointers or experience is appreciated. One further on

Re: how to turn off spamassassin entirely on a per-user basis

SpamAssassin can't do it, it has to be done where SA is called in the first place. It's in easy in some systems (procmail, maildrop), but maybe hard in some others (spamass-milter). Alex Aminoff wrote: > I have searched and searched and cannot find a configuration directive > that you can p

how to turn off spamassassin entirely on a per-user basis

I have searched and searched and cannot find a configuration directive that you can put in .spamassassin/user_prefs that simply turns off spamassassin entirely for that user - meaning that SA will immediately return with exit code 0. In the FAQ it says to whitelist the user, but I would prefe

Bayes - one database per user or one for everybody?

ion, which allows me to have one single database for all. I wonder if it's better to have a single database (which probably could be larger than the size of 8MB per user I allowed with DBM storage method) or keep per-user ones? So, what are the advantages of a single database? And d

Re: per user filtering

Ronan McGlue wrote: > I have succesfully enabled weprefs 0.6 from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/webuserprefs/ > for my domain. I had to write an ldap authenticator mind you but it is > trivial... > > Now i have a couple more questions. Is this to be used in conjuction > with the local.cf file o

per user filtering

I have succesfully enabled weprefs 0.6 from http://sourceforge.net/projects/webuserprefs/ for my domain. I had to write an ldap authenticator mind you but it is trivial... Now i have a couple more questions. Is this to be used in conjuction with the local.cf file on the spamassassin server or

Re: per-user rules from mysql

On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Parker wrote: Duane Hill wrote: header L_TO_ME ToCc =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ describe L_TO_ME Email addressed to me score L_TO_ME 0.010 You can't do rules with SQL user prefs, not even with allow_user_rules. Only non-admin config options are allowed. That'

Re: per-user rules from mysql

Duane Hill wrote: > > header L_TO_ME ToCc =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > describe L_TO_ME Email addressed to me > score L_TO_ME 0.010 > You can't do rules with SQL user prefs, not even with allow_user_rules. Only non-admin config options are allowed. Michael

per-user rules from mysql

I'm trying to get SA to read user rules from MySQL. I've exhausted all testing and have not found a way. I have spamd starting with the following parameters: --username=spamd --groupname=spamd --min-children=2 --max-children=8 --min-spare=4 --max-spare=6 --max-conn-per-child=120 --timeout

Re: Per User

gt; you should not reply.I need help if any one can. As Magnus asked u could perhaps provide some additional information, afaik (i dont use it on per user) it depends on e.g. are u using "shell accounts" or "virtual users" stored in a mysql-database? -- Greetings MH Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Per User

per user) it depends on e.g. are u using "shell accounts" or "virtual users" stored in a mysql-database? -- Greetings MH Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Per User

On Thursday 03 May 2007 12:50, Ali Hameed wrote: > I am using spamd on my linux system, I now want to give our users > choice that they want to use spamd or not, if yes they can write their own > rules, please help! This is a very general question. What MTA do you have and how do you call spamd f

Re: Per User

I didnt find any help on the specified link, did u? Also what prevents you from giving me some specific link?If u cant help then you should not reply.I need help if any one can. On 5/3/07, Matthias Haegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ali Hameed schrieb: > I am using spamd on my linux system, I

Re: Per User

Ali Hameed schrieb: I am using spamd on my linux system, I now want to give our users choice that they want to use spamd or not, if yes they can write their own rules, please help! What prevends you from reading:? http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ -- Grüsse/Greetings MH Dont send mai

Per User

I am using spamd on my linux system, I now want to give our users choice that they want to use spamd or not, if yes they can write their own rules, please help!

Re: Per User Settings?

On Sun, April 1, 2007 21:12, Davin Flatten wrote: > Please read http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL > We have done the same thing at our site and it works great. still have to wait here for amavisd-new and spamassassin do this, problem is that recipient user is not used, but only unix us

Re: Per User Settings?

Paul- Please read http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL We have done the same thing at our site and it works great. -Davin

per user scanning

I am now able to call spamassassin from exim with the users localpart of their email address from within exim. I have tested it and it is calling to spamd with the line user='whatever' however in both AWL and bayes i dont see the user appearing, now im aware that the bayes required a certain m

Re: Help with per-user sa-learn

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Fix the ALL_TRUSTED hit. I also don't see any network-rule hits, so > if you're not using those you should be. Also look at using > sa-update if you aren't. Thanks for pointing them out -- I'll look into them immediately. I have sa-update running v

Re: Help with per-user sa-learn

On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 10:09:54AM -0400, Joe Casadonte wrote: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_99, > DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_99, > FROM_EXCE

  1   2   3   >