On 6/23/24 10:26 PM, Larry Nedry via users wrote:
On 7/21/23 9:10 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Hi,
phishstats[.]info domain has recently moved to a parking domain, if you are using
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing plugin with data downloaded from PhishStats[.]info
it would be better
On 7/21/23 9:10 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Hi,
phishstats[.]info domain has recently moved to a parking domain, if
you are using Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing plugin with data
downloaded from PhishStats[.]info it would be better to comment
"phishing_phishstats_feed" configur
no rules set in default sa-update
its unclear from perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::FromNameSpoof how
to make a local config to use it
could it be added one example config ?
i like to catch when ReplyTo is same as From:addr users should stop add
ReplyTo when not needed
Thanks, Matus, I'd just realized all that. :(
On 26/10/2023 4:03 pm, Bill Cole wrote:
Your SA installation is broken.
Well, I'd guessed that.
WelcomeListSubject is a new module in v4, replacing WhiteListSubject.
This is 3.4, so it should be referencing the old whitelist module.
If you have anything referencing it in a 3.4.6
3.4.6 on Perl version
5.32.1 on Debian Bullseye. Result of --lint is...
Oct 26 14:39:02.888 [121778] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin
(from @INC): Can't locate
Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/WelcomeListSubject.pm in @INC (you may need
to install the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WelcomeListSubject
3.4.6 on Perl version 5.32.1 on
Debian Bullseye. Result of --lint is...
Oct 26 14:39:02.888 [121778] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin
(from @INC): Can't locate
Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/WelcomeListSubject.pm in @INC (you may need
to install the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WelcomeListSubject
: failed to parse plugin (from
@INC): Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/WelcomeListSubject.pm in
@INC (you may need to install the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WelcomeListSubject module) (@INC contains:
/usr/share/perl5 /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.32.1
/usr/local/share/perl
Hi,
phishstats[.]info domain has recently moved to a parking domain, if you are using
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing plugin with data downloaded from PhishStats[.]info
it would be better to comment "phishing_phishstats_feed" configuration line.
If PhishStats[.]info will not
On 11 Jun 2020, PGNet Dev outgrape:
> for anyone interested, it appears the config, as advised, is a bit of a mess
>
> using _explicit_ config of
>
>./configure \
>--with-installroot=/ \
> --mandir=/usr/local/man \
> --bindir=/usr/local/bin \
>
--disable-dccifd
with
local.cf
...
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
use_dcc1
dcc_home /var/lib/dcc
dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc
endif
...
fixes the issue.
ough; tho, on spamd restart, I see in logs,
Jun 11 08:06:49 mx spamd[10742]: util: refusing to untaint suspicious
path: "${exec_prefix}/lib"
commenting out,
v310.pre
- loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
+ loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassi
On 25.04.19 08:05, Brent Clark wrote:
I was going through https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy
Just wanted to ask, anyone out there using
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
So the idea is I declare "good languages"
ok_languages en af
(I declare af, cause I a
Good day Guys
I was going through https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy
Just wanted to ask, anyone out there using
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
So the idea is I declare "good languages"
ok_languages en af
(I declare af, cause I am in South Africa)
Th
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:43:13 +0200
Brent Clark wrote:
> Good day Guys
>
> Just would like to double check something with the community.
>
> Is the plugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing still relevant in
> this day and age?
>
> I have a daily cron entry that wg
Il 16 gennaio 2019 09:43:13 CET, Brent Clark ha
scritto:
>Good day Guys
>
>Just would like to double check something with the community.
>
>Is the plugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing still relevant in
>this day and age?
>
>I have a daily cron entry that wg
Good day Guys
Just would like to double check something with the community.
Is the plugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing still relevant in
this day and age?
I have a daily cron entry that wgets the following feed(s):
https://openphish.com/feed.txt
http://data.phishtank.com/data/online
:
Subject: Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm:
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: Permission denied
Update: the cd /home/rd solves the problem!
I did not realize that the reportspam-line.sh is just called once and I have
to restart it
try "mkdir -m 000 lib&
e complete debug output here:
>
> http://paste.debian.net/1021089/
>
> Maybe somebody sees something suspicious...
>
> I am really wondering why perl is missing the prefix, e.g. here
>
> Apr 19 20:40:14.161 [23757] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from
> @
/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/
Plugin/SpamCop.pm: Permission denied at (eval 31) line 1.
Thanks
Rainer
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2018, 10:08:24 CEST schrieb Jesse Norell:
> Somewhat of a guess, but try adding "cd /home/rd/" at the top of your
> script. I've had a similar
t; > Are you running both commands as the same user?
> >
> > Reio
> >
> > On 18.04.2018 23:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > >
> > > That was also my first guess, but it seems not the be the case
> > > here alll
> > > dirs are 755 and the file 644
s like
Apr 18 18:44:40.902 [5112] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC):
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/
Plugin/SpamCop.pm: Permission denied at (eval 31) line 1.
I have seen similar commands when ./lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm
direc
unning both commands as the same user?
>
> Reio
>
> On 18.04.2018 23:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > That was also my first guess, but it seems not the be the case here alll
> > dirs are 755 and the file 644:
> >
> > rd@netcup:~$ locate SpamCop.pm
> > /usr/share/pe
Are you running both commands as the same user?
Reio
On 18.04.2018 23:00, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
That was also my first guess, but it seems not the be the case here alll dirs
are 755 and the file 644:
rd@netcup:~$ locate SpamCop.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm
rd@netcup
That was also my first guess, but it seems not the be the case here alll dirs
are 755 and the file 644:
rd@netcup:~$ locate SpamCop.pm
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm
rd@netcup:~$ ls -l /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8578 Feb 7
t;
> while read line
> do
> echo "$line"
> spamassassin -rD < /home/rd/Maildir/.SPAM-learned/cur/$line
> done < "${1:-/dev/stdin}"
> rd@netcup:~$
>
> Then spamassassin report errors like
>
> Apr 18 18:44:40.902 [5112] warn: plugin
n: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC):
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SpamCop.pm: lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/
Plugin/SpamCop.pm: Permission denied at (eval 31) line 1.
Apr 18 18:44:40.902 [5112] dbg: plugin: loading
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold from @INC
Apr 18 18:44:4
On 11/29/2017 11:55 AM, Paul Stead wrote:
Similar plugin I wrote last year – does detect a few other variants as well
https://github.com/fmbla/spamassassin-olemacro/ (
Sorry I missed this last year! As I just wrote, I do a lot of this in
MIMEDefang and will definitely take a look. You
Similar plugin I wrote last year – does detect a few other variants as well
https://github.com/fmbla/spamassassin-olemacro/ (
On 29/11/2017, 16:51, "Giovanni Bechis" <giova...@paclan.it> wrote:
Hi,
if anybody is interested I recently wrote a SpamAssassin plugin to det
Hi,
if anybody is interested I recently wrote a SpamAssassin plugin to detect OLE2
Macros in Office documents.
Source code and more info on Github:
https://github.com/bigio/spamassassin-vba-macro
Cheers
Giovanni
Thanks.
From: Kevin Golding <k...@caomhin.org>
Sent: 27 July 2017 14:41
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::EmailBL??
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:28:06 +0100, hospice admin <hospice...@outlook.com>
wrote:
> t
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:28:06 +0100, hospice admin
wrote:
the above plugin doesn't seem to be distributed with the version of
SpamAssassin I'm running:
spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0
running on Perl version 5.16.3
Also, I can't find mention of
Hi,
the above plugin doesn't seem to be distributed with the version of
SpamAssassin I'm running:
spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0
running on Perl version 5.16.3
Also, I can't find mention of a download location anywhere.
Am I right in thinking this was an experiment
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 10:05 AM, apache.org+spamassas...@daniel-rudolf.de wrote:
>
> As you can see, SA will increase the score by 0.5 when the From: and
> Return-Path: headers don't match ("ne" for "not equal").
This particular rule will FP for most mailing list emails... including this
one.
: headers:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HeadersEqual
[/path/to/HeadersEqual.pm]
header SENDER_MISMATCH eval:headers_equal("ne", "From:addr",
"Return-Path:addr")
score SENDER_MISMATCH 0.5
As you can see, SA will increase the score by 0.5 when the F
>> [snip]
>> body HAS_VBS_FILES eval:attachmentpresent_file_count('vbs')
>> describe HAS_VBS_FILES The e-mail has attached vbs files (or inside
>> archives)
>> score HAS_VBS_FILES 2.5
>
> This looks very interesting. The scores you've specified seem to be
> quite high, however. I'd probably make
listed functions, without the ability to use
mimedefang?
Not that I know of, though you could write a SpamAssassin plugin, I suppose.
Our algorithm simply searches for those strings in an Office documents if
macros were detected. The newer docx, xlsx, etc. variants are simply
zip files in disgui
ains those listed functions, without the ability to use
> mimedefang?
Not that I know of, though you could write a SpamAssassin plugin, I suppose.
Our algorithm simply searches for those strings in an Office documents if
macros were detected. The newer docx, xlsx, etc. variants are simply
zip file
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:12:36 -0500 (CDT)
> David B Funk wrote:
>
>> What is 'acceptable' to you? Unless you find some magical prescient
>> anti-virus that can accurately predict all
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:12:36 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk wrote:
> What is 'acceptable' to you? Unless you find some magical prescient
> anti-virus that can accurately predict all possible macro viruses
> with out FPs I don't know what else can be done.
Almost all of
Am 06.09.2016 um 23:27 schrieb Alex:
Is there any ability to determine if a particular attachment has a
Word macro enclosed in addition to just having a Word document?
that's the hob of clamav and the sa-plugin for it
"OLE2BlockMacros yes" in case of a scored SA plugin won't block but add
Hi,
Is there any ability to determine if a particular attachment has a
Word macro enclosed in addition to just having a Word document?
>>>
>>>
>>> that's the hob of clamav and the sa-plugin for it
>>>
>>> "OLE2BlockMacros yes" in case of a scored SA plugin won't block but add
>>> the
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Is there any ability to determine if a particular attachment has a
Word macro enclosed in addition to just having a Word document?
that's the hob of clamav and the sa-plugin for it
"OLE2BlockMacros yes" in case of a scored SA plugin won't block but add
Am 06.09.2016 um 22:40 schrieb Alex:
Is there any ability to determine if a particular attachment has a
Word macro enclosed in addition to just having a Word document?
that's the hob of clamav and the sa-plugin for it
"OLE2BlockMacros yes" in case of a scored SA plugin won't block but add
Hi,
>> Is there any ability to determine if a particular attachment has a
>> Word macro enclosed in addition to just having a Word document?
>
> that's the hob of clamav and the sa-plugin for it
>
> "OLE2BlockMacros yes" in case of a scored SA plugin won't block but add the
> score of that
Am 06.09.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Alex:
Is there any ability to determine if a particular attachment has a
Word macro enclosed in addition to just having a Word document?
that's the hob of clamav and the sa-plugin for it
"OLE2BlockMacros yes" in case of a scored SA plugin won't block but add
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg
wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I decided to publish a SA Plugin we use over here.
> The Plugin will check if attachments with a certain file extension are
> present in the mail. This can be either directly attached or
://metacpan.org/release/Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-AttachmentPresent)
and ofcource feedback is welcome.
Cheers,
Merijn
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 18:30:18 Mark Martinec wrote:
If not in v320.pre then it must be in some other .pre file.
As Benny Pedersen noted your log shows that this plugin is enabled.
Perhaps in /etc/spamassassin/sa-compile.pre .
The Rule2XSBody plugin is loaded on ubuntu in sa-compile.pre.
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 20:17:57 Mark Martinec wrote:
It may be worth trying with the current trunk version from SVN
(a would-be-3.4.1), as Kevin suggested, so that we'd be on the same
page.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DevelopmentStuff :
The code itself is maintained in a
On 21. jan. 2015 22.57.37 mls m...@xlist.pw wrote:
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 18:30:18 Mark Martinec wrote:
If not in v320.pre then it must be in some other .pre file.
As Benny Pedersen noted your log shows that this plugin is enabled.
Perhaps in /etc/spamassassin/sa-compile.pre .
The
mls wrote:
The Rule2XSBody plugin is loaded on ubuntu in sa-compile.pre.
After commenting it out the issue no longer happened.
Great, that is an important finding!
Benny Pedersen wrote:
warn dont use cpan direct in ubuntu, you will break dependice, and
later ask why does it not work
if you
On 21. jan. 2015 22.58.32 mls m...@xlist.pw wrote:
On Tuesday 20 January 2015 20:17:57 Mark Martinec wrote:
It may be worth trying with the current trunk version from SVN
(a would-be-3.4.1), as Kevin suggested, so that we'd be on the same
page.
mls skrev den 2015-01-20 08:52:
http://paste2.org/HzINJUwL
My mailserver runs on ubuntu 14.04 and Rule2XSBody is commented out by
default
in /etc/spamassassin/v320.pre
see line 88 in the above url ?
and you miss running local nameserver as you are URIBL_BLOCKED
plugin,
i.e. by commenting-out a line:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in one of the .pre config files (probably in v320.pre) ?
My mailserver runs on ubuntu 14.04 and Rule2XSBody is commented out by
default
in /etc/spamassassin/v320.pre
If not in v320.pre then it must
chosen.
[...]
Jan 20 08:16:11.068 [18848] dbg: plugin:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval=HASH(0xae42840)
implements 'check_start', priority 0
Jan 20 08:16:11.081 [18848] warn: plugin: eval failed: Insecure
dependency in sprintf
while running with -T switch at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail
the Rule2XSBody plugin,
i.e. by commenting-out a line:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in one of the .pre config files (probably in v320.pre) ?
Mark
check here:
http://paste2.org/HzINJUwL
Does the problem go away if you disable the Rule2XSBody plugin,
i.e. by commenting-out a line:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody
in one of the .pre config files (probably in v320.pre) ?
My mailserver runs on ubuntu 14.04 and Rule2XSBody
On Sunday 18 January 2015 08:46:47 Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Based on a quick search, this page leads me to believe it's fixed in a
newer version of SA:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141695
Regards,
KAM
Thanks. I am running SA verion 3.4.0. According to the
Klaus wrote:
Thanks. I am running SA version 3.4.0.
Jan 17 08:00:12.091 [2891] warn: rules: failed to compile
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check::_head_tests_0_1, skipping:
Jan 17 08:00:12.091 [2891] warn: (Insecure dependency in require
while running with -T switch at (eval 1037) line 9
On Monday 19 January 2015 18:42:54 Mark Martinec wrote:
In Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Check.pm near line 453 (version 3.4.0)
(i.e. in sub flush_evalstr) there is a commented-out debug line:
# dbg(rules: eval code(2): %s, $self-{evalstr});
Try uncommenting it and enable debugging (option
On 1/18/2015 7:18 AM, mls wrote:
I am seeing more and more emails that cause the following PERL warnings when
scanned with spamassassin
Based on a quick search, this page leads me to believe it's fixed in a
newer version of SA:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141695
Regards,
KAM
Hi,
I am seeing more and more emails that cause the following PERL warnings when
scanned with spamassassin
Jan 17 08:00:12.091 [2891] warn: rules: failed to compile
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check::_head_tests_0_1, skipping:
Jan 17 08:00:12.091 [2891] warn: (Insecure dependency in require
://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/failed-to-compile-Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-Check-body-tests-tp105674p105697.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 07/09/2013 09:59 AM, tony wrote:
sa-compile.txt
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/file/n105697/sa-compile.txt
I've uploaded sa-compile.txt which is the output I got when I ran:
/usr/bin/sa-compile --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin
--updatedir=/etc/mail/spamassassin
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/failed-to-compile-Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-Check-body-tests-tp105674p105699.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/9/2013 3:59 AM, tony wrote:
sa-compile.txt
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/file/n105697/sa-compile.txt
I've uploaded sa-compile.txt which is the output I got when I ran:
/usr/bin/sa-compile --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin
--updatedir=/etc/mail/spamassassin
Run sa-update
-SpamAssassin-Plugin-Check-body-tests-tp105674p105704.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2013-07-08 16:57:
On 7/6/2013 5:15 AM, tony wrote:
I'm running a centos 5.9 server with spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5, when
I do an
'#su defang' check on a test spam I'm getting:
*warn: rules: failed to compile
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check::_body_tests_0_3, skipping
tony skrev den 2013-07-08 22:08:
thanks for your response. I went into v320.pre and *loadplugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody* is already commented ie: it
has a
'#' at the beginning on the line. Did you mean uncomment?
if you uncomment you must aswell use sa-compile:
#update
tony skrev den 2013-07-09 09:59:
sa-compile.txt
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/file/n105697/sa-compile.txt
I've uploaded sa-compile.txt which is the output I got when I ran:
/usr/bin/sa-compile --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin
--updatedir=/etc/mail/spamassassin
try
tony skrev den 2013-07-09 12:48:
thankyou kevin you found the problem. I did have errors in local.cf
and when
I cleared these up I did '#su defang' again on a test spam and
this time
there were no errors and no warnings.
what the heck is su defang ?, is i spammassassin runnning on
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 01:36 -0700, tony wrote:
ok I've re-done the sa-compile and uploaded a new text file. The command I
used was:
/usr/bin/sa-compile --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin
--updatedir=/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003001/updates_spamassassin_org
The update dir is still wrong.
in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/failed-to-compile-Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-Check-body-tests-tp105674p105722.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
, so spamassassin
scores the mail and mimedefang acts on the score.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/failed-to-compile-Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-Check-body-tests-tp105674p105723.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/6/2013 5:15 AM, tony wrote:
I'm running a centos 5.9 server with spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5, when I do an
'#su defang' check on a test spam I'm getting:
*warn: rules: failed to compile
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check::_body_tests_0_3, skipping:*
I did a search on google but found nothing
thanks for your response. I went into v320.pre and *loadplugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody* is already commented ie: it has a
'#' at the beginning on the line. Did you mean uncomment?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/failed-to-compile-Mail
On 7/8/2013 4:08 PM, tony wrote:
thanks for your response. I went into v320.pre and *loadplugin
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody* is already commented ie: it has a
'#' at the beginning on the line. Did you mean uncomment?
No, I meant comment. That should be what uses compiled rules. Odd
I'm running a centos 5.9 server with spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5, when I do an
'#su defang' check on a test spam I'm getting:
*warn: rules: failed to compile
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check::_body_tests_0_3, skipping:*
I did a search on google but found nothing for this particular error. How do
I
I've noticed that this problem is ongoing, my upgrade to 3.3.2
notwithstanding.
To restate the question: My mailbox contains between 10-20 false positives
every morning. Before reporting them, I pass them through the spam
assassin filter again. About 20-25% are flagged as spam the second time
On 8/16/2012 1:01 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
I've noticed that this problem is ongoing, my upgrade to 3.3.2
notwithstanding.
To restate the question: My mailbox contains between 10-20 false
positives every morning. Before reporting them, I pass them through
the spam assassin filter again.
On 08/16/2012 07:01 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
I've noticed that this problem is ongoing, my upgrade to 3.3.2
notwithstanding.
To restate the question: My mailbox contains between 10-20 false positives
every morning. Before reporting them, I pass them through the spam
assassin filter again.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Jim Schueler wrote:
To restate the question: My mailbox contains between 10-20 false positives
every morning. Before reporting them, I pass them through the spam
assassin filter again. About 20-25% are flagged as spam the second time
through.
The most obvious
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jim Schueler jschue...@eloquency.comwrote:
The attached contains two files:
spamtoday.msg came out of a filter in my mail stream
spamtoday.out is spamtoday.msg piped through 'spamassassin -t'
This problem occurs very intermittently. Out of 300 daily
On 8/14/2012 9:30 AM, Jim Schueler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jim Schueler
jschue...@eloquency.com mailto:jschue...@eloquency.com wrote:
The attached contains two files:
spamtoday.msg came out of a filter in my mail stream
spamtoday.out is spamtoday.msg piped
Hi,
Are these options still valid for
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop settings in the local.cf
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SpamCop.html
(from spamcop.net http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/331.html ).
*It is recommended the default settings
On 11/04/12 15:30, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
Hi,
Are these options still valid for
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop settings in the local.cf
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SpamCop.html
(from spamcop.net http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/331.html
Den 2012-04-11 15:37, Simon Loewenthal skrev:
Partially answered.
# spamassassin --lint
Apr 11 15:35:06.700 [24545] warn: config: failed to parse line,
skipping, in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf: auto_report_threshold 30
Was it replaced by something else, or simply superceded?
is spamcop plugin
by something else, or simply superceded?
is spamcop plugin even loaded ?
spamcop.pm is open source btw :)
# grep -i spamcop v310.pre
# SpamCop - perform SpamCop message reporting
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop
# -D --lint
Apr 12 01:26:54.403 [17560] dbg: plugin: loading
Mail
On Thursday 07 July 2011 16:46:42 Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Have you considered using Shortcircuit plugin?
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit
Partially I use it. I gave up for anything more than using it with
whitelist_from.
tests...
Does what I desire seem as what can be achieved? Or maybe I got
something wrong? Please let me know...
Have you considered using Shortcircuit plugin?
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Shortcircuit
IMHO it should be capable to deliver what you want.
--
[plen: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip
I wrote a plugin that tries to do some operation on the receiver mail
address before the message is delivered.
How can i retrieve such address?
$mailTo = $pms-get('EnvelopeTo:addr');
dbg(EvelopeTo-Addr read from mail $mailTo);
and i have this output on the log:
Tue Dec 14 22:45:54 2010 [2807]
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 22:51 +0100, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
I wrote a plugin that tries to do some operation on the receiver mail
address before the message is delivered.
Operation? You're not trying to change it, are you?
How can i retrieve such address?
$mailTo =
# I guess the actual header, if any, depends on your MTA and glue. The
# whitelist_to option in the Conf documentation has a list with likely
# candidates.
I use Postfix. What Conf do you talk about?
I have to compare it with a list in a database and with a custom
header but this is not
Fixicated the copy-n-paste blob to reply...
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 23:08 +0100, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
2010/12/14 Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de:
How can i retrieve such address?
$mailTo = $pms-get('EnvelopeTo:addr');
dbg(EvelopeTo-Addr read from mail $mailTo);
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:38 +0200, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
Hi all. I'm writing a simple spamassassin plugin that eval just
subject but it does not.
$self-register_eval_rule (check_header_token);
It's an eval() rule. So you also need to define a SA rule, that calls
the function. Please
:38 +0200, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
Hi all. I'm writing a simple spamassassin plugin that eval just
subject but it does not.
$self-register_eval_rule (check_header_token);
It's an eval() rule. So you also need to define a SA rule, that calls
the function. Please read the docs carefully
These might be starting to get dated a little but I think that if you look at
the Extending Apache SpamAssassin Using Plugin slides and notes from here:
http://people.apache.org/~parker/presentations/index.html
That will give you a good idea on what you need to accomplish for your plugin.
I read also the first part of that slides with the attached notes. I
did exacly the same steps except the configuration parsing (i thought
i don't need it, was i wrong?)
I logged 2 messages 1 in the new funcion and one in eval rule function:
It prints all mesages at spamd restart but not when i
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:38 +0200, Massimiliano Giovine wrote:
Thanks for the answer:
I also put 25_myplugin.cf where other plugin's confs are.
Don't. This will be lost on the next successful sa-update run. Instead,
use your site config dir for the custom cf file.
if loadplugin myplugin
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo