Well the error messages kind of gives it away, doesn't it?
But to explain further: setDefaultFormProcessing(false) doesn't mean the
button can be placed outside a a form. It means that the default
validation and submit behavior of the form is not executed when pressing
the button. Why do you want
I don't think there's anything wrong with serving resources from the
webapp-folder, and making the webapp container (e.g. jetty) responsible
for serving them instead of Wicket. Most webapp containers will serve
static resources much more efficiently than any servlet-based (including
Wicket's) appro
a new one if the CSS has been generated is
> before the last modification of the Less file(s)
Please note that LessSource.URLSource is not threadsafe, your
CacheManager seems to assume that. I went the same route as you, caching
LessSource, but made my own threadsafe LessSource implementation for
that (
ket has a CachingResourceStreamLocator that caches the resource streams.
> >
> > here's my wicket less implementation, could be helpful too:
> > https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/tree/master/bootstrap-less
> >
> >
> > Am 26.03.2013 um 01:01
, Michael Haitz wrote:
> Wicket has a CachingResourceStreamLocator that caches the resource
> streams.
>
> here's my wicket less implementation, could be helpful too:
> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/tree/master/bootstrap-less
>
>
> Am 26.03.2013 u
probably better at caching than a Java solution could
> ever
> be.
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
>
> > I have implemented a LessCssResource (it generates a CSS resource from
> > Less source files) + LessCssResourceReference. Since computing th
I have implemented a LessCssResource (it generates a CSS resource from
Less source files) + LessCssResourceReference. Since computing the CSS
is expensive, I would like to cache the generated CSS on the server,
once generated. It is unclear to me whether Wicket has mechanisms to do
this. I expected
Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013, at 14:07, Thomas Götz wrote:
> Please have a look at FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy.
>
>-Tom
>
>
> On 22.03.2013, at 14:01, Pointbreak
> wrote:
>
> > When rendering the header items for packeded resource reference
When rendering the header items for packeded resource references, wicket
appends a suffix like "-ver-1363953702887" to the name of the resource.
Can somebody point me add the place in the code where this suffix is
generated and/or document if/how this could be disabled (preferably on a
case by case
his is not possible.
> is just a convenience. The full power is in the Java based
> header contributors.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way (in Wicket 6) to prioritize items in wicket:head/head
> > elements to get th
Is there a way (in Wicket 6) to prioritize items in wicket:head/head
elements to get them inside the head of the final page before all code
contributed header items? I.e. something like PriorityHeaderItem, but
applied to the markup of an item in the wicket:head of a template?
Thanks!
Why don't you just keep the session alive as long as the user has an
ajax page open? You can easily do this by letting the page do a timed
ajax call to the server every x minutes, where x is slightly less than
your session timeout.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013, at 17:56, sthomps wrote:
> I'm currently in
With that code the javascript should be added to the markup (which is
easy to check if you view the source form your browser). Your problem is
that the generated javascript is incorrect: you have no closing [']
after the url. That would have shown up if you opened the page in
Firebug with Scripts e
[X] Other suggestion: don't have a class on the span, or even better,
don't have the span element at all inside the list-item
For any customisations beyound this, just create your own FeedbackPanel,
it's easy and gives complete control.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012, at 17:03, Sebastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
[X] I use Shiro
Because it's simple in use and simple to integrate with Wicket or other
frameworks, but still powerful enough for most security related tasks.
And because I liked it more than Spring Security three years or so ago.
I think Spring Security is more feature complete out of the box tho
ne it for many
projects so far). That's obviously very subjective. It looks like an
impressive library nonetheless!
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012, at 15:30, Sébastien Gautrin wrote:
> Hi Pointbreak,
>
> At least for wicket-jquery-ui, it offers also pure behaviours
> integration for jque
It's a very long time ago that I looked at the API's, so it's likely
things have changed since that time. But the problem I had with both
products is that they are mostly component based API's (meaning they
offer an Accordion component, Autocomplete component, etc.). Imho, a
much more flexible appr
If your panel depends on jquery, you should render the reference to
jquery also in your panel.
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012, at 13:40, Oscar Besga Arcauz wrote:
> Hi wickers !
>
> I've a problem with wicket and jquery resource rendering.
>
> My webpage has many panels wich uses jquery, and they have ja
I would use PackageTextTemplate to render the javascript, e.g. put your
javascript in MyPage.js along with the other templates, and use
${facebookId} for the id, then add this to your class:
@Override public void renderHead(IHeaderResponse response) {
super.renderHead(response);
PackageTex
You should at least escape your ':', i.e. something like: BODY
WICKET\:MESSAGE * { }
But I doubt it will work on any browser. If you really want to keep the
wicket:message tags (imho you're better of without them), you could wrap
them in another container (div/span) and use that conatiner as a cs
The tree node selections are fully handled by ajax requests, so they
will (obviously) never change the url of the page. Change the selection
of e.g. the dropdown for "Content", and you will see that the url
changes.
There are ways to have forms without version/id information in the URL.
Search thi
You probably have another webapp already mounted as root context (in
your webapps/ROOT). You obviously can't have two webapps under the
root...
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012, at 09:31, Satrix wrote:
> I changed the name of WAR file to ROOT.war but no luck now it's
> www.domain.com/ROOT/home :/
> From what
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 15:46, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:39 PM, heikki wrote:
> > What's the point in refreshing if it returns exactly the same page as
> > before ?
>
> it allows components such as datatables and others that pull data from
> the database to refresh, while
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 14:34, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:30, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:30, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:05, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:30, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:05, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 12:05, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 11:42, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 11:42, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 10:56, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 11:42, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 10:56, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 10:56, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 09:49, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, M
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 09:49, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 08:23, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012, at 08:23, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012, at 20:00, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> >> i think there is some confusion here. wicket 1.4 had page ids. it also
> >> had page versions. i
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012, at 20:00, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i think there is some confusion here. wicket 1.4 had page ids. it also
> had page versions. in 1.5 we simply merged page id and page version
> into the same variable - page id. this made things much simpler and
> also allowed some usecases that
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012, at 20:00, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i think there is some confusion here. wicket 1.4 had page ids. it also
> had page versions. in 1.5 we simply merged page id and page version
> into the same variable - page id. this made things much simpler and
> also allowed some usecases that
We have recently upgraded our application from Wicket 1.4 to Wicket 1.5.
One problem we encounter is with Ajax handlers we have that use
AbstractAjaxBehavior.getCallbackUrl to bind serverside code to actions
in the browser. I have been debugging this, and the problem seems to be
that the callback-u
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012, at 10:50, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012, at 10:40, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Pointbreak
> >> wrote:
> >> > Yes (sort
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012, at 10:40, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > Yes (sort of) except you don't need two users. Just bookmark a page with
> > a version/id e.g. ?5, close the sessions, open a new session, do some
> >
he mount if it
> > doesnt. jira please.
>
> This is already the case, no need of a ticket for this. If there is no
> ?5 then Wicket creates ?0 and shows it.
>
> The "problem" Pointbreak actually mean is that userA may have opened
> ?5 in his session, copy the url
rsionMount thanks to pointbreak
> > in my MainApplication. And It will be my template for future app. But
> > to do it, I needed to understood the problem, check on google, read a
> > lot of pages, without found a solution, so post the question here, and
> > after 3 post, got a
Create a class NoVersionMount:
/**
* Provides a mount strategy that drops the version number from
* stateful page urls.
*/
public class NoVersionMount extends MountedMapper {
public NoVersionMount(String path, Class pageClass) {
super(path, pageClass, new PageParametersEncoder());
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4425
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012, at 14:01, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Agree. Wicket should not do this in this case.
> File a ticket with a quickstart.
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Pointbreak
> wrote:
> > I
You will still need client initiated requests to get your
"non-stop-updates" from the page/component to the browser. Hence, just
separate the work (which you can do continuously in your thread) from
the page rendering (which will need to be initiated by a browser request
whatever you do). Will make
I have recently upgraded from Wicket 1.4.14 to 1.5.4. One issue that I
encountered is that tags in panel templates are rewritten by
Wicket, even when the