http://www.totalizm.nazwa.pl/boiler.htm
This reference contains technical details of the boiler invented by Mr
Peter Daysh Davey which is the basis of the design discussed in this thread.
Cheers: Axil
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:39 PM, wrote:
> Courtesy of pesn.com -
>
> Steven Jones replica
I thought the article was incoherent enough that I'd be afraid to guess
what the author really thinks his own point is. Ymmv.
Jeff
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> Here is my exegesis of Sterling Allan's presentation of Steven Jones's
> recent research:
>
> 1. There is piez
Here is my exegesis of Sterling Allan's presentation of Steven Jones's
recent research:
1. There is piezonuclear fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery was
not this.
2. There is metal-assisted d-d fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery
was also not this.
3. There is anamalous xs heat, or
It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title:
Steven Jones replica: Pons & Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion
Then the author (Allen) goes on to quote Jones as follows:
"... there is a confirmed and published effect showing products of d-d
[deuterium-deuterium] fusion at low levels.
With about the same frequency that three large comets (2 long period and 1
short period) visit the inner solar system... Panstarrs visits once every
110,000 years. I hope the sun does not have a bad spell
The other thing that occurs approx once every 500 years as found in ice
cores is:
Ice core
Gad. What a jerk. Was, is, remains.
- Jed
Courtesy of pesn.com -
Steven Jones replica: Pons & Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion
Jones is experimenting with a bell electrode setup that strongly evidences
excess (xs) energy and has similarities to the cell presented by Pons and
Fleischmann. He says that there are at least two distinct ph
How often do Carrington-type solar storms occur?
"Occurrence rate of extreme magnetic storms"
http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4417
Possibility of transient room-temp superconductivity
"Superradiant Superconductivity"
http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4567
Nanoparticles may focus fields to arbitrarily high s
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:51:20 -0800:
Hi,
1. More energetic neutrinos react more strongly with matter.
2. A massive localized fusion reaction somewhere below the surface of the Sun
might take a day or so for the energy to reach the surface, and produce a CME.
3. Ne
The other thing to note is the particle is in a decaying Earth orbit, not
your silly ass Wolfram 1st grade example.
On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
> I'm sorry, that answer is only a little better than "Its in the library
> somewhere."
>
> You get an F.
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012
I thought the post was kind of funny. The complaints are the usual ones -- no
radiation, lack of reproducibility, not following the scientific method, etc. I
think the post is harmless.
Eric
On Nov 19, 2012, at 10:33, David L Babcock wrote:
> Anybody up for this? At least go read it...
>
>
I'm sorry, that answer is only a little better than "Its in the library
somewhere."
You get an F.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Read my blog
>
>
> On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
>
>> Pop quiz!
>>
>> Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivat
Read my blog
On Monday, November 19, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
> Pop quiz!
>
> Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and
> maxima of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum
> shape for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled
>
Pop quiz!
Kepler is famous for having solved calculus derivation of minima and maxima
of a curve when presented with the challenge of finding the optimum shape
for a barrel of dill pickles to go with the tasty char broiled hamburgers
that history now recognizes as the inspiration for flavour in ph
Here's a web site to get you through it:
http://deoxy.org/
You'll find it to be multi-dimensional and hence, better than the HHGttG.
Bring a towel.
If Armageddon were linked to Mideast violence we would all be long gone.
I think the technology is close.
With 3 comets in the inner solar system we might be dodging dark matter for
awhile. For the next year we will be living dangerously close to those
intersecting points on a Feynman particle d
With the middle east violence escalating on schedule to coincide with the end
of the Mayan calendar I gotta wonder when the proof of LENR will be released so
the aliens and illuminatti can finally reveal themselves, for myself I feel the
end of the Mayan calendar may only be a side effect of the
Notice Woflram does not show you the particle mass. Orbits depend on more
than just velocity. Also notice that the research does not place a lower
limit on mass:
"If the WIMP is heavy even with optimistic assumptions and large exposures
it will only be possible to place a lower limit on its mass
At Resilience.org (was Energy Bulletin), the article "Science's Evil
Twin" by Ugo Bardi. This piece of trash takes the 'toxic science' approach:
http://www.resilience.org/stories/2012-11-19/science-s-evil-twin
I have enormous respect for the many contributors at Resilience, but
this guy does
My, Goodness!
You'd better get over there to Wolfram's model of WIMP Orbiting Inside Earth
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/WIMPOrbitingInsideEarth/
And tell them to fix their units labeling. If one were a hamburger helper
physicist, one might be led to believe that the speed unit was m/s rath
In the early 1990's, physicist Ken Shoulders received five patents for his
discovery of the High Density Charge Cluster (HDCC), "a relatively
discrete, self-contained, negatively-charged, high-density state of matter
(a bundle of electrons that) appears to be produced by the application of a
high e
Stick to cooking hamburgers. You make much more sense in your field of
knowledge
local WIMP speed distribution is known (Maxwellian with vc=220 km/s)
http://conferences.fnal.gov/dmwksp/Talks/AGreen.pdf
fits great with my orbital model speed and mass of a massive collapsed
particle
I have suppli
Big brother
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles
On Monday, November 19, 2012, Jones Beene wrote:
> Hi - I’m confused by your references. These two citations appear to be
> incompatible. The Berkeley paper suggests neutrinos and dark matter are
> identical or else
iYes, of course! The weak interaction, which essentially disappears at a
distance of around 10^-17m, provides many orders of magnitude greater force
than does gravitation at scales of 10^3m. This is why a gremlin travelling
at speeds orders of magnitude above escape velocity, is able to avoid
esc
Hi - I'm confused by your references. These two citations appear to be
incompatible. The Berkeley paper suggests neutrinos and dark matter are
identical or else neutrinos are an energetic subset of dark matter. However,
neutrinos cannot "orbit" anything since they have no charge or magnetic
suscept
Yes, this is exactly the point. The solar neutrino rate does not vary
noticeably due to flares. Instead another kind of radiation precedes flares,
and is measureable on earth as accelerated decay rates.
This new kind of radiation could possibly correspond to what Storms
describes.
The rad
Jones,
I believe the Elliptical CMEs you see on the sun are made up of orbiting
dark matter around the nucleus of the sun, which is also dark matter. They
trigger beta decay in their surroundings, breaking up the hydrogen into
protons, electrons and creating neutrinos. The elliptical CME arc at
Jones, do you have an estimate of the actual per cent increase of the total
neutrino flux that occurs during a flare as compared to the normal flux? I
would expect the increase to be virtually un measurable unless there is
something interesting going on within the Sun's center where copious amo
This story from Purdue is of interest for several
unexplained energy phenomenon, including LENR and the recent disclosure of
Ed Storms. That disclosure is suggestive a hidden kind of radiation which
accelerates nuclear decay rates.
http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/re
29 matches
Mail list logo
