Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

Rossi said: Andrea Rossi June 16th, 2015 at 7:31 PM Paul: Looking at the derivatives I would answer more like popcorns, looking at the integral I would say piece of charcoal. Warm Regards, Sibilla Cumana In this post, Rossi is speaking as the oracle Sibilla Cumana. The title

[Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

Strong local magnetic fields may be established by SPP entities at appropriate temperatures. The combination of correct temperature (phonic lattice vibrations) and magnetic field may create the necessary resonances (NMR and lattice vibrations) to allow new coherent system configuration with l

[Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

Strong local magnetic fields may be established by SPP entities at appropriate temperatures. The combination of correct temperature (phonic lattice vibrations) and magnetic field may create the necessary resonances (NMR and lattice vibrations) to allow new coherent system configuration with l

Re: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

The nice feature of an high performance infrared sensor with a fast resolution time of a few microseconds is that you can see LENR explosive bursts with good resolution. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > I think these thermal bursts that destroys some of the experiments sh

Re: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

The real disadvantage of the thermal imagers and spot sensors is that they cannot "reach in" and see the temperature of the core or a spot related to core temperature. In the Parkhomov experiments, there is a measure of insulation between the core and the visibly accessible outside of the experime

Re: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

I think these thermal bursts that destroys some of the experiments should be analyzed with a priority.

Re: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

Axil Axil wrote: I recomended this high temperaure sensor for a LENR experiment. > > > http://www.micro-epsilon.com/temperature-sensors/thermoMETER_CT_Video/thermoMETER_CT_VideoM3/index.html > > IMHO, its great. > That's an infrared sensor. I agree those things are nifty, but I think that in add

Re: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

I recomended this high temperaure sensor for a LENR experiment. http://www.micro-epsilon.com/temperature-sensors/thermoMETER_CT_Video/thermoMETER_CT_VideoM3/index.html IMHO, its great. See http://www.micro-epsilon.com/download/products/cat--thermoMETER-Infrared--en-us.pdf On Fri, Jun 19, 201

RE: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

http://www.omega.com/googlebase/product.html?pn=BARE-20-K-12 &gclid=CICB3p-FncYCFQqFfgod4owAaA Omega is a good supplier. Not cheap but good. From: MarkI-ZeroPoint Thought I'd ask the

RE: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

One comment on: ... "For instance, Dennis Cravens did not use a changing field in his sphere system which appears to work at very low temperatures. Why is he able to demonstrate apparent LENR at less than 100 C when all of the recent experiments require 1000 C and even then are difficult to prove?

Re: [Vo]:"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

Lennart Thornros wrote: > That works in large organizations. Solindra for example is of course poor > allocating of funds. > You are missing the point. Yes, Solyndra was a poor allocation, but most of the money invested by the DoE Loan Programs Office was in excellent allocations. Overall, the

Re: [Vo]:"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

Jed, I disagree with your conclusions. I agree with your examples they are without any doubt correct and we could show many more - small and big. I do not think congress demands accountability. Like all people in the frontline they only have one interest themselves. Therefore the going way is the C

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:54:43 -0700: Hi, Yes, that's basically what I had in mind. Note however that in order for net energy to be released a nuclear reaction of some kind has to occur. Perhaps Rossi's theoretician is correct, and Li needs to be stimulated to a highe

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5699.pdf The P and A mesons in strong abelian magnetic field in SU(2) lattice gauge theory. http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf QCD in strong magnetic field On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Axil-- > > Do you have a refe

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5699.pdf The P and A mesons in strong abelian magnetic field in SU(2) lattice gauge theory. http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf QCD in strong magnetic field On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Axil-- > > Do you have a refe

Re: [Vo]:"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

Lennart Thornros wrote: > The problem is all those analysis about why it went wrong and that big > money was misused. > The government is providing grants as they see fit. > The government means a bunch of bureaucrats. They cannot spell risk. > Therefore we will end up with more rules and restri

Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:03:32 -0400: Hi, In the past there have been some LENR experiments that implied that movement of gas through the metal was important. Such movement could be driven by temperature shifts. Another possibility is that shifting magnetic doma

Re: [Vo]:"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

Jed I think this is true and that is good. The problem is all those analysis about why it went wrong and that big money was misused. The government is providing grants as they see fit. The government means a bunch of bureaucrats. They cannot spell risk. Therefore we will end up with more rules and

[Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

Axil-- Do you have a reference paper for the creation of mesons from the vacuum magnetic energy? If what you suggest is possible then it may also be possible to create mesons in a strong magnetic field such as that created in transient SPP entities. I would agree that, if muons are formed,

[Vo]:"Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

Here are some papers about mistakes in medical research: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1196486/ This may make you feel better about all the mistakes in cold fusion, and all the crummy papers. Mistakes are endemic in science. They

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

There is a huge amount of EMF amplification involved in nanoparticle aggregation. The amplification is proportional to the size difference between a 10 micron particle and a 1 nanometer space between nanoparticles, That is a gain of 10,000. the microparticle act as a dipole antenna that receives he

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

By the way, the magnetic energy to muon conversion process does not violate any conservation laws. The production of electrons by the particle condinsation process is a drag on the COP of the reactor. On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/07/ross

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/07/rossi-on-electrostatic-force-from-the-e-cat/ Rossi on ‘Electrostatic’ Force from the E-Cat On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > My theory posits the production of mesons through the convertion of > magnetic energy from the vacume into sub atom

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

My theory posits the production of mesons through the convertion of magnetic energy from the vacume into sub atomic particles. The mesons decay into muons (via the Schwinger limit) and the fusion is muon catalized fusion. There is a repodt of electrostatic fields around the Cat. This could be due

[Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

Fran-- The new science currently at bay is the source of energy IMHO. I think it is small losses of mass to heat. Exchange of energy with the Dirac sea is another possibility. The evidence seems to me to indicate loss of mass is the source. Are there any theories that include an exchange

[Vo]:comments and news for June 19, 2015

Dear Friends, Believe me, I have tried but reality is stubborn stuff: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/trying-to-discover-good-lenr-news-for.html Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

Hi, See: http://www.lakeshore.com/products/Cryogenic-Temperature-Controllers/Model-335/Pages/Sensor-Temperature-Range.aspx Kind regards, Rob MarkI-ZeroPoint schreef op 19-6-2015 om 16:45: Thought I’d ask the Collective if they could point me at any info onsensors for very high temperatures

[Vo]:Request: info on very high (2000F) temp sensors

Thought I'd ask the Collective if they could point me at any info on sensors for very high temperatures (over 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit). Thanks in Advance, -Mark Iverson

RE: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

Jones, I was painting with a wide brush to underscore a common basis between even these distantly related anomalies. You are certainly correct that the microwaves are NOT an efficient linkage to the active geometries used for the E-cat generator but the EM drive works in reverse and we don't car

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion

Bob, I see a direct connection between the temperature of the inner nickel holder and the LENR activity in that test. When I follow the falling nickel box temperature I see that the LENR has the appearance of a relaxation oscillator that can not quite operate on its own bias. It also makes a f

Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

This post does imply that some extra difficulties are present when attempting a gas powered ECAT. I forgot this one small posting among many others that are of a positive nature. If we want to get to the facts, someone needs to ask Rossi on his blog whether or not he has made progress with the

RE: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

Fran, Cavity QED is worth pursuing, but you may be saddling the wrong horse. There is almost no chance that the E-Cat is powered by microwaves, given how easy they would be to observe if present. If Cavity QED is involved with the E-Cat, as it probably is - the wavelengths being suppressed are in

RE: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

For the record… This statement from Rossi confirms Dave’s original observation that AR never said that natural gas power does not work for triggering … quite the contrary. In fact the implication is that gas heat works but requires another input in addition to thermal… which is probably m

Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion

I maintain that Rossi's E- Cat and Shawyer's EM drive are both based on "Cavity QED". In Zofia Birula 1996 paper http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf she describes Rydberg atoms with modified spontaneous emissions by virtue of microwave cavity suppression. In the interim