On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:43 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John,
Let's think about the magnetic field analysis first since that is
relatively easy to visualize. First, I think that we are in agreement that
a magnetic field generated as a consequence of the motion of a charged
for localizing
electrons, quantum mechanic is or better...quantum electrodynamics.
Use the proper tool for the proper job. This Mills like discussion is not
productive just like the results of this type of thinking. Use tennis
balls...
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:26 PM, John Berry berry.joh
of time to
discuss other issues as they arise out of a common understanding.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 19, 2014 5:26 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model of Coulomb's law
On Thu, Feb
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:25 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Eric is right about the constancy of c being a *postulate* from which
time-dilation and length contraction are derived.
However, that doesn't discount your thought experiments as a way of
probing the coherence of
that the electrons moving in the
wire should see the protons (net positive relative moving charge) in the
other wire as moving past them, and hence making a magnetic field that they
should feel an attractive force from?
And if not, then why not?
John
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry
and walks back to his
friend
so that they can compare the time on their watches. Which watch is ahead?
Using the principles of SR I can come up with contradictory answers.
harry
Harry
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:45 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4
identical) is if each one interacts with a photon that occurs only
in their reference frame.
But this idea has problems as a photon could be avoided, or 'met' twice (or
more) with changes in velocity.
John
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:15 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20
Axil, who are you asking?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Intense EMF will breakdown the vacuum, electric fields produce
electron/positron particle pairs that do not immediately self-annihilate;
intense magnetic fields produce mesons out of the vacuum.
But Terry, but are these epo's moving?
Do they occur with a random velocity relative to light speed?
If so they could be anywhere from stationary to 99.% of the
speed of light, with the latter being about as likely as the former.
But the evidence seems to point to them being largely
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:51 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The muon experiments show time dilation in operation. Once I calculated
the equivalent velocity of the muon assuming that time dilation did not
exist. I obtained a velocity of IIRC about 10 times the speed of light.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:42 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
Why not first consider the speed of electromagnetic wave propagation as
either being constant or not regardless of the motion of the reference
Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 19, 2014 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model of Coulomb's law
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:38 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
OK, I can use tennis balls just
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Ok, so time dilation must have occurred for the muon, it moved through
the reference frame of the lab and lasted longer because of it.
But the Muon was not conscious, carried no instrumentation and surely had
no
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Like you I have harbored the idea of an ether that is local. I just can
not find a reason to assume any ether at all.
There are many reasons, there is quite a lot of evidence actually, actually
a lot especially if you
discussing your ideas.
I'll have a look, thanks.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 19, 2014 11:42 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Time Dilation impossibility
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, David Roberson dlrober
5:42 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I am not sure that this will get anywhere but I can answer the question
according to what I would expect.
So if you were moving with the electrons/neg-balls, would you see a
magnetic field from the protons/pos-balls in the other wire/pipe?
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:51 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I figured that you were attempting to set some sort of trap. :-) Take the
time to figure out what I have described and you will understand that every
observer has a valid viewpoint that depends upon his relative motion.
The second phi is the same as the 3rd symbol font phi in chrome.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:20 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
The one that is giving me trouble is phi a circle with a line though it.
This is what Greek has:
φ Φ
They are not quite right. Here it is in symbol
font.
electron.
This is similar to us looking at two electrons that are in motion within
an accelerator.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Feb 17, 2014 3:13 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model
of the other electron.
This is similar to us looking at two electrons that are in motion within
an accelerator.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Feb 17, 2014 3:13 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent
Originally the aether was thought to exist, but it was hoped the earth
would move though it rather than entrain it, maybe as a continued departure
from earth centric thinking, or more likely because a static aether was far
more simple than trying to understand an aether that was entrained to some
?
John
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:21 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Originally the aether was thought to exist, but it was hoped the earth
would move though it rather than entrain it, maybe as a continued departure
from earth centric thinking, or more likely because a static
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:27 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
John, you make a lot of interesting arguments, but special relativity
always seems to come through with the right answers.
Mostly true, but it gives the same answers as an entrained aether.
Remember that SR is largely
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Also, I would genuinely like to know if anyone disagrees with my
arguments, or fails to understand them.
I had a hard time following your
to their instruments while all
the other observers in motion relative to them measure otherwise.
It is a fun exercise trying to prove special relativity is wrong, but
you will eventually come to the realization that it is correct.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 7:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model of Coulomb's law
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:14 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
Harry,
I see your objection and I
where it has failed and these cases are
consistent with an entrained aether, apparently GPS satellite systems show
such issues.*
Can you say more about GPS satellite systems an their issues with the
aether or provide a reference.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:35 AM, John Berry berry.joh
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok, let's keep it really simple.
Can you explain how a moving 'train' could measure the velocity of the
same photon/s as a stationary observer
mistaken on all of this since I have largely ignored the
subject so I am sure i could be schooled on this point.
John
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:07 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
Dave, I think the simple answer is to recognize that a magnetic field
only exists due to motion
David, if the electrons do not see that in their world view, then the
second one is hardly exposed to something that does not exist for it.
Every electrically charged object has in other reference frames various
magnetic fields, the axis and direction of the magnetic field is decided by
the
And on Chrome.
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Nigel Dyer l...@thedyers.org.uk wrote:
I get greek: running thunderbird on windows 7
Nigel
On 16/02/2014 06:36, H Veeder wrote:
This is a test to see if the greek letters I have copied and pasted into
this message are preserved as they
I have long considered another quantum means of instantaneous communication.
Partial reflection (like oil film on water) depends on the thickness of the
partially reflective layer.
If the thickness increases a little the dominant reflected frequency shifts
and this occurs in cycles, with no
David, if I understand you, you are talking about if 2 co-moving electrons
should be attracted or repelled?
In a wire it seems that it would be correct to model the electromagnetic
field created by the 'stationary' protons which are moving from the
electrons POV.
This carries an additional
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:41 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the source of the magnetism?
Motion of the electrons through an electromagnetic reference frame in
violation of SR?
If only moving electrons are considered, and no static charges exist.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 16,
In his model the coloumb force between two like charges increases when the
charges are moving together and decreases when they are moving apart.
This would lead to a few interesting conclusions if true.
In a current carrying wire, stationary electrons in the wire would would
face increased
could compress in front and stretch
out the back.
But this would lead to induction opposite to the norm.
Can anyone explain how this force could have gone unobserved?
Are these arguments flawed?
John
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:59 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
In his model
It would make sense, a Doppler like effect is very reasonable with electric
fields.
Now if this is so, it is very possible that gravity could be explained this
way.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:09 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery and other vortex members,
Today I learned
Could the longitudinal displacement be instantaneous, while the transverse
is limited to C?
There reminds me of a conundrum that occurs with magnetic fields especially
if one does not consider vector analysis.
If a current is passed through a large hoop coil suddenly (current quickly
reaching a
The creation of charge? The creation of electrons?
Any FE device that does this is wasting energy by manifesting matter.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
did.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:49 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
The creation of charge? The creation of electrons?
Any FE device that does this is wasting energy by manifesting matter.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://peswiki.com
Hi, some of you may remember that I designed images that I claim effect the
background energy of space (aether, dark matter/energy, higgs field,
quantum foam) to the point of being felt by most people.
Some people have felt the energy and inquired about why they can feel
something hitting them
Slight improvement: http://imageshack.com/a/img191/665/0o55.png
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:15 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, some of you may remember that I designed images that I claim effect
the background energy of space (aether, dark matter/energy, higgs field,
quantum
://imageshack.com/a/img713/8647/megf.png
Place your palm to the right side of your monitor in-line with the long
string of methologies used in this one.
Alternately feel the front of the screen.
John
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:54 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Slight improvement: http
The energy it stirs up can persist for a while.
If these spots are where various parts of the image are, it is more likely
you are feeling a non-physical energy effected by the images.
John
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 6:10 AM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
Some areas feel warmer than
to run double blind controls over the internet. Why don't you?
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:15 AM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, some of you may remember that I designed images that I claim effect
the background energy of space (aether, dark matter/energy, higgs field,
quantum foam
analyze the data.
Better yet, outsiders can inspect the data and supply their own
interpretations.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:06 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so have 2 images, one active and one inactive.
See if people can establish which is which?
Good idea, I will mock
Except for when I have written it, I have never seen the words Magnetism
doesn't exist written.
But this confuses me because while the illusion of magnetism is pretty
convincing we can all agree the expected forces in any magnetic situation
are electric at each end (magnetic fields are created by
is an illusion created by electric
fields being unmasked by the distorting effects of motion is certainly not
saying motion is an illusion.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:42 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:25 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Except for when I
While looking at reviews for Caver A. Mead's book, I read a review that
said he made a mistake including voltage in a calculation for
superconductors.
Now I think that there must be voltage of a type in superconductors, there
are 2 types of voltage.
One is the voltage drop across a conductor.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
While looking at reviews for Caver A. Mead's book, I read a review that
said he made a mistake including voltage in a calculation for
superconductors.
Now I think that there must be voltage of a type in
in motion, if SR is correct then a magnetic field that occurs in one
reference frame does not occur in a co-moving frame.
Magnetic fields are a useful fiction, but hardly real.
John
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:03 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:58 PM, John Berry
John R. Huizenga, then Sven Kullander and now Emilio del Giudice.
It would seem to be a bad time to be older and on either side of LENR.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Cold fusion has lost a good friend: professor
Emilio del Giudice (born 1940) has
It is likely that the exact value of the fine structure constant is not
significant as it appears to change based on energy (1/128 at 80 GEV) and
seems to vary over time.
So 137 might be a decent integer approximation of a value that changes
under varying circumstances.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
43%? Are you sure? I think it should be 51.8%. Then again, depending on
his grades at Yale, maybe only 47.53%. Just spitballing here . . . but I
don't see where you came up with 43%.
- Jed
While naturally some
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:12 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is enlightening to consider the structure of the universe and the many
wonders that it reveals to us. Keep asking the right questions and you
will find appropriate answers.
I have observed the behavior of
AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:36 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
There wasn't a law for the conservation of mass when the CoE was
proposed, but probably only because it would have seemed obvious.
Conservation of mass was proposed
Still Feynman obstructed Papp from operating a device that Feynman did not
understand.
By doing so he essentially became fully responsible for anything the
machine does due to the power being disconnected for too long.
It was only Feynman's cynicism that would not have him plug it back in
despite
David, you show a most annoying circular reasoning trap.
First you fail to recognize the obvious resistance to a product that will
put oil and energy companies out of business, one of the biggest there is.
Next you say that you would require an extraordinary level of evidence to
believe in it.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:31 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Sorry John. You are correct about what you say to a certain extent. How
much resistance do you think the general public would exhibit to owning a
vehicle that runs virtually for free?
Virtually zero, BUT that is the
the CoE was proposed,
but probably only because it would have seemed obvious.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:10 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:31 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
Sorry John. You are correct about what you say to a certain extent
that have billions of possible outcomes every
millisecond, this would split off universes in a perhaps more rapid way
than happens with natural phenomena. (or not?)
Hastening the quantum apocalypse!
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:36 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are some thoughts
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
Porn and Gambling are pretty much equivalent, moral wise.
Porn has good sides, both demystifying the human body and sexuality and
providing a source of sexual outlet when otherwise there might be few good
options.
Huh, the subject line sounds like a pun, it's even-even so it's a photon
fission. And it's nickel 62 by a neutron!
I didn't expect it to be serious.
All the dumb money in that race was on too hot to trot and donut daze
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
How is this a cycle though?
Unless grandma funds more research into the subject...
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
blazespinna...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?f=1174
That doesn't work for me.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A bibliography of the Electrically Exploded Conductor Phenomenon, Fourth
Edition
William G. Chace
Eleanor M. Watson
October 1967
I was using chrome, so I tried FF and then IE, and still it can't resolve
the domain.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't work for me.
Look carefully at your browser. It is probably saving
, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Works for me. There, I shortened it: http://tinyurl.com/lyxu8f9
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:53 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was using chrome, so I tried FF and then IE, and still it can't resolve
the domain
communications, or work product, related to personal
representation or services by attorneys, psychotherapists, or clergy, and
their assistants. Such communications and work product are private and
confidential. See User Agreement for details.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:27 AM, John Berry berry.joh
I believe the problem with fringe subjects is that the focus goes of the
end results and does not focus on the underlying physics.
If you just chase an effect that is not really understood thoroughly
enough, then what you end up getting looks more like magic than science.
Complete with
It is also possible the universe is just a dream, or a shared hallucination.
Maybe all our memories are manufactured and we have not been on this earth
and list for x number of years, we may only have implanted memories and
started 'fresh' this morning.
Many far out and improbable things can be
The aether, cold fusion, antigravity, free energy is all crazy talk.
But maybe reality is a simulation because some movies were made depicting
this, well that's totally sensible.
Since that isn't a threat to the status quo.
Of course the pre-pre-pre-pre matrix version of this were the Gnostics.
Paradox. That
is, where are the aliens? Perhaps there aren't any, because the simulator
can only really do earth and that's it.
It's like the star trek holodeck, you walk outside the deck and you vanish.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:06 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
The aether
in space.aether/higgs field
that allows different qualities for reality?
John
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:01 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
That is still ridiculous.
What evidence would you expect there to be for aliens that is absent,
except for totally open public exposure/disclosure
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Blaze, that kind of thing was one of the things I was alluding to.
The stuff that is now openly admitted to as 'Old News' is horrific.
It was not that horrific. Not like
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
It was not that horrific. Not like a war, or a thermonuclear bomb. Have
a sense of proportion!
In many ways it is worse.
No question the loss of life is less, but even
This is may seem kinda far out, but it claims that a nuclear false flag
attack was going to take place in Washington to start a war with Syria.
And the MP's were going to arrest Obama.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't just seem kinda far out. It IS far out. Far, far out.
Farther out than the Voyager 1 spacecraft.
Ok, but the problem here is that you have limits to what you will give
serious consideration.
While I know
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The scary part is that intelligent people would consider this claim even
plausible when the idea is obviously the hallucination of an insane mind.
Of course the government lies, of course it does bad things, of course
Jed, do you believe that if you were in countries that had insane
governments, and you were raised in that culture and had a normal degree of
faith in that government. Would you have seen them as insane?
Hindsight is 20/20, you would not fall for that would you?
And if it was 1962 and operation
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree, if you are twisted, and want the power of fear over people to
control them with more draconian measures and to start a war because you
want people to support
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, do you believe that if you were in countries that had insane
governments, and you were raised in that culture and had a normal degree of
faith in that government. Would
The most interesting and somewhat topic relevant portion of this discussion
is that of why belief systems that support trust in leadership, authority
and beliefs that support general social cohesion are likely to be strongly
selected in evolutionary terms.
If you are likely to go against the
.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:24 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.comwrote:
The most interesting and somewhat topic relevant portion of this
discussion is that of why belief systems that support trust in leadership
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ
Very funny.
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/09/urgent-false-flag-involving-israel-to.html
First I saw this, how attractive to think that maybe global warming isn't
happening...
http://www.naturalnews.com/041981_global_warming_computer_models_cooling.html
But that seemed like a fantasy, and I saw:
The difference surely is the motive?
Much of the money raised by Green Peace and WWF is donated by hard working
individuals altruistically to protect the earth ans all life forms on it.
Money donated by these groups is out of self interest to continue polluting
for profit.
If that seems the
As was I, or at least I meant to.
Gmail hides the quoted text and I was not careful enough to reply to the
right email.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
I was answering Alain.
2013/9/10 John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
The difference surely
Syria: Nobel Peace Laureate Tells Her Account of What She
Witnessed
http://tinyurl.com/ntqu9pa
7 min. video
Nobel Peace Prize laurete, Mairead Maguire visited Syria and
discovered that the U.S. is funding violent groups that do not
want peace in Syria.
Thousands fled from Syria because foreign
Shocking Story That Could Derail Attack on Syria
http://tinyurl.com/oj8g53t
11 min. video
Respected 20 year Middle Eastern reporter and Associated
Press, BBC and NPR correspondent Dale Gavrak was told by
Syrian rebels that they were responsible for last week's
chemical weapons incident in Ghouta.
The Germans wouldn't send a bunch or murders to Poland to attack Germany
either.
But then again they did
And even though it was obvious to anyone sensible and unbiased, world war
II still happened.
And even though everyone who had 2 brain cells to rub together knew that
the coalition of the
The thing that should be concerning is that a country as powerful as the US
(and spends so insanely much on toys for warfare) ever looks for, makes up,
provides chemical weapons as pretexts to get into war (which is hardly new).
Seriously if we were to think of this as a person it would be a nut
http://stormcloudsgathering.com/leaked-britam-defense-syrian-documents-download
This makes a strong case indeed for the attacks being a pretence for war.
464MB of emails and other documents obtained by a hacker from Britam
Defense.
John
Others claimed to be able to start fires from drops of water.
But this was tried with lots of water, and under cover to stop the wind
blowing out any flames or the sun drying out the water drops.
There was no success there either.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
I am not 100% sure, but I think an AC meter would read a current from such
fluctuating DC, I might be wrong, easy to test, but I am moving house soon
so my equipment is packed away, but some AC meters such as clamp meters
should still give an AC reading, as for an AC volt meter I am unsure,
maybe,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:04 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
When will they finally realize that Rossi may have something?
They always knew he might, but they are skeptics and will always oppose any
advancement or change until it is over one way or the other.
Who expects to
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
When will they finally realize that Rossi may have something?
They always knew he might . . .
I doubt that. I cannot read minds, but I get a sense that Shanahan, Nate
Question: If skeptics really do not believe that something is possible,
then why must they fight so hard to defend reality from such an ill
conceived notion?
Especially when something like cold fusion clearly could not be believed
for long if funded and embraced and it turned out to be entirely
It depends of the magnitude of the DC in relation to the AC.
If the DC bias was equal to the AC peak voltage, then the current would not
reverse.
And the peak voltage in the biased direction would have doubled.
Doubling the voltage quadruples the power, also the DC component could be
much
Ok, Maybe no one is ready, since I have had zero testers give results
positive or negative.
But I want to give this a fresh chance due to apparent technical
difficulties the first time, excuse my persistence.
http://img802.imageshack.us/img802/7185/xens.png
301 - 400 of 975 matches
Mail list logo
