May be an image of 5 people and text that says
more deletions to follow
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 23:52
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouT
#x27;ll be happy | The Great Reset | Klaus Schwab
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IzwiH40JOc
-- Original Message -- From: "Lennart Thornros"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 20
Sep, 21 At 23:19 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction
to C
onday, 20 Sep, 21 At 23:19
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
Just så the Said in germany in the 1930is. Government can do as they
want. The government wants our best.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 13:09 Jed Rothwell <mailto:jedrothw.
Just så the Said in germany in the 1930is. Government can do as they want.
The government wants our best.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 13:09 Jed Rothwell wrote:
> ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
>
>
>> >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice
>>
>
> Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never allow
I disagree, it is fascism when corporations and government are in
partnership.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 18:09
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
> >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice
>
Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never allowed to interfere with
my freedom of speech, or Facebook's, or the U.S. government's freedom of
speech. The voters are not allowed to overrule the Constitution. The
ele
I see they don't mention using deuterium, (heavy hydrogen,) and micro-cluster
palladium as a source, which is the easiest and most cost effective.
On Monday, September 20, 2021, 08:29:46 AM PDT, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
government and big tech working together is f
ishers for the benefit of
the public since colonial times.<<
myth
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:29
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
R
Emails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGvRzwdnnM0
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
government and big tech
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
government and big tech working together is fascism -> the electorate
> didn't vote for that
>
No vote is needed. The government and big tech both have the right of free
speech, and the right to do whatever they like as long as it is legal. The
electorate cannot take away t
is that free?
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> >
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
they hooked me
>
Poor you! Maybe there is some kind YouTube addiction withdrawal support
network.
tolerate until kill it
https://awareity.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/temp_frogs.png
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:51
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion
they hooked me
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:56
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> >
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
more things have to pay for all adds up
>
Okay, so if the ads annoy you and you don't want to pay $12 a month, don't
watch YouTube. No one is forcing you to watch it. I do not understand what
you are complaining about.
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with
> big tech to censor -->
>
The government and big tech have every right to work together.
> The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech “…to
> flag ‘problematic’ posts “th
more things have to pay for all adds up
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:40
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to get
> people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them.
>
$12 a month does not seem like fleecing to me. It is more than I would be
willing to pay, but a lot less than cable TV, or YouTube T
i/YouTube
so is a platform, NOT publisher
trouble is -> it got criticized for what it shows -> so now starts
censoring
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:21
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief I
H LV wrote:
Platform, or Publisher?
> If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then
> they need to get out of the censorship business.
>
If they are trying to shield themselves claiming "platform" rights under
Code 230, that's unfair. I don't know what the story is. In m
21 At 14:46
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:
It is not their constitutional right to censor.
It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post
Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to
get people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 14:50
Subject: Re: [Vo]
CB Sites wrote:
Yeah, the monetization of youtube sucks. They do have to find a way to pay
> for it so I just sit through a 30sec ad or two and skip the 2-15 minute
> ones. But annoying as heck, I agree with.
>
It turns out you can get YouTube Premium for $12 a month. That eliminates
the ads.
Platform, or Publisher?
If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then they
need to get out of the censorship business.
Adam CandeubMark Epstein
May 7, 2018
https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html
quote <>
Harry
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:56 AM
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
It is not their constitutional right to censor.
>
It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post cannot be
forced to publish an editorial they disagree with. They can censor any
opinion or letter they want. If the government were to force them to
publish
OGER ANDERTON"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
> YouTube ads
>
> As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with
> big tech to cen
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership
with big tech to censor -->
T
not allowed to censor and big tech allowed
to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing.
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction
It is not their constitutional right to censor.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
AM ROGER ANDERTON <m
AM ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
> shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech
>
Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX
News or the Scientific American can restrict you
s for "dangerous" -> as per Manhattan project -> parts of physics is
deemed "dangerous" and has to be censored.
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 02:03
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "
te-all-proven-correct.html
etc.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 01:47
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was not
> censored, can you/we expect them not to eventually censor
>
YouTube never said it would not be censored. They said from the start they
would not allow pornography, revenge or dangerous vids.
It is
Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was
not censored, can you/we expect them not to eventually censor
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Saturday, 18 Sep, 21 At 21:29
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "
I revised the Video Introduction page to embed the video, and I told the
reader there are no subtitles in the downloadable version but the scripts
are below.
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
Not really new, its the same old trick everytime; its like how illegal
> drugs are pushed -> the dealer gives you them free until you are hooked
> then you have to pay; Youtube were giving a free service, now they are
> looking for getting money from it.
>
Well, you can't e
there always turns out to be a catch. When it looks too good to be true
then it was too good to be true.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Saturday, 18 Sep, 21 At 19:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion&q
Oh. You learn something new every day. I see you can pay them to delete the
ads for $12 a month, with YouTube Premium. This I did not know, because I
am out of it. Far, far out of it. Light years away from it.
- Jed
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:12 PM ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> Youtube has started pu
17 Sep, 21 At 19:12
Subject: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
Around July of this year, the number of people viewing my video fell.
Recently I watched the video and discovered that YouTube is stuffing
advertisements in front of it. I guess that is why
Around July of this year, the number of people viewing my video fell.
Recently I watched the video and discovered that YouTube is stuffing
advertisements in front of it. I guess that is why fewer people are
watching it. There does not seem to be a way to override this. The
"monetization" option is
40 matches
Mail list logo
