a legitimate theoretical speculation and possibly valid lines of
actual evidence are given by astrophysicist Robert Foot and a few
collaborators for about a decade for mirror matter, which interacts
fully with itself, but only about a part in a million with ordinary
matter for electromagnetic
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Can you read English?
Please show me where I was advocating one of those dubious breakthroughs!
I wasn’t advocating anything. How you got that notion from my posting is
a mystery to me!
**
in the
CF case we are likely dealing with quantum mechanical interactions, and this
could also be involved in the latter cases.
-mark
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2011 12:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kullander Nov. 23 lecture
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Mary wrote:
“If I call you to come see I can fly and I sit there and flap my arms, and I
do this or different people do this a hundred times, are you going to come
the hundredth and first? The example
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kullander Nov. 23 lecture slides (mostly in Swedish)
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Mary wrote:
If I call you to come see I can fly and I sit there and flap my arms, and
I do this or different people do
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3352744.ece/BINARY/Kullander_lecture_23nov.pdf
It was boring, that Kullander used sodium cooled fast reactor as an
example of 4th gen nuclear power, because it is probably inherently
failed concept. LFTR is way better concept, because there is required
much less manufacturing and reprocessing nuclear fuel.
Also he seem to be still out of
OH! I think there is a little bit of new information! Take a look at page
50! Data on 6 old experiments.
But, I didn't understand something. Eric Lerner never talked anything about
LENR, as far as I know, see page 58. In fact, Eric aims to work with fusion
7000x hotter than what is found in
Maybe there will be an English translation. In the meantime, can anyone
tell me if Kullander addresses the superb concerns and excellent
measurement methods proposed by Grabowski et al (US Naval Research
Laboratory) here?
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GrabowskiKrobustperf.pdf
I think everyone
That Melich, in the paper, is Rossi's friend, tested the ecats, in 2009, I
think, and it is an enemy of Krivit. Krivit hates that guy. Krivit, 1 day
after the first test in January, noticed that he was associated with Rossi,
and since that very moment, he showed a negative attitude towards Rossi.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
That Melich, in the paper, is Rossi's friend, tested the ecats, in 2009, I
think, and it is an enemy of Krivit. Krivit hates that guy. Krivit, 1 day
after the first test in January, noticed that he was associated with
I think Jed can answer better than I do. But the reason is Krivit doesn't
like that guy it is that he thinks Melich a cover agent of the US
government to suppress cold fusion. But they are very probably associated,
as you can see in the list of Rossi's list of advisors in his blog as well
as some
Am 24.11.2011 19:22, schrieb Mary Yugo:
I tried translating from the Swedish PDF to English with Google. It's
not entirely satisfactory but it does suggest that Kullander did
consider Grabowski's paper or the same concerns from theory. If I
understood him, Kullander concluded that Rossi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
Am 24.11.2011 19:22, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Did he not discuss the fact, that the electrical energy was not enough for
boiling?
It was barely enough for 60°, at this water flow rate.
I think this is evident and
Am 24.11.2011 19:48, schrieb Mary Yugo:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Peter Heckert
peter.heck...@arcor.de mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 24.11.2011 19:22, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Did he not discuss the fact, that the electrical energy was not
enough for boiling?
It
Am 24.11.2011 20:10, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Btw, it is interesting to see in figure 6 that the differential
steepness at 10:36 abruptly and exactly doubles.
It looks as if a second 300W heater was activated. This is enough for
some boiling.
If there was water overflow this would be
Am 24.11.2011 20:36, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 24.11.2011 20:10, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Btw, it is interesting to see in figure 6 that the differential
steepness at 10:36 abruptly and exactly doubles.
It looks as if a second 300W heater was activated. This is enough for
some boiling.
If
From: Peter Heckert [mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 11:11 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kullander Nov. 23 lecture slides (mostly in Swedish)
snip
Scientific experiments must be documented for eternity, not for a single
day.
This is something
Another possible problem with the paper at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EssenHexperiment.pdf is that they don't say
where and how they measured input power with their ammeter. Maybe they say
it elsewhere. Rossi has two heaters in the device -- a startup heater in
the middle and a safety (?!?!)
Am 24.11.2011 21:30, schrieb Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint:
Peter wrote:
Scientific experiments must be documented for eternity, not for a
single day.
This is something that Rossi seemingly not understands.
I can't believe these kinds of statements are still made!
What Peter doesn't understand,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
** Then, why does he invite scientists? Kullander and Essen are rather
high level scientists. For what does he need Levi?
Exactly. Not to mention his invitation a while back to Josephson.
Fire all scientists
Am 24.11.2011 21:34, schrieb Mary Yugo:
Another possible problem with the paper at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/EssenHexperiment.pdf is that they don't
say where and how they measured input power with their ammeter. Maybe
they say it
[snip]
My suspicion is that KE did it correctly with the
I did say I was not going to reply to you but your last statement is
just 100% BS. The reactor and the Blue Box sat on a table. There was ONE
power cord that was plugged into the wall. It went to the Blue Box (then
the RFG was inside the Blue Box) and then to the reactor. There were no
other
24, 2011 12:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kullander Nov. 23 lecture slides (mostly in Swedish)
snip
I can't agree with ignoring other bad science and technology fraud. The
average person in the street won't know that water cars (adding on board
generation of hydrogen
, November 24, 2011 12:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kullander Nov. 23 lecture slides (mostly in Swedish)
I did say I was not going to reply to you but your last statement is just
100% BS. The reactor and the Blue Box sat on a table. There was ONE power
cord that was plugged
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
It is SELDOM a black or white situation… just because past claims of
magnet motors and water cars have been shown to be mistaken or fraudulent,
doesn’t mean that ALL such claims can be concluded to be the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Agreed AG!
In fact, on several of the earlier tests, the reactor was lifted up off of
the table so one could see that there were no hidden wires or pipes
attached.
SO, there are only two possibilities
Am 24.11.2011 22:08, schrieb Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint:
No one is suggesting we ignore it!
And who's to say that one of those magnet motors or water cars doesn't
do what is claimed?
I must admit, I have never seen a magnet motor or water car.
Because I dont see these devices that where
Slide 45 is the one I adapted from New Energy Times it's in my steam
quality document! - Original Message -
See:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3352744.ece/BINARY/Kullander_lecture_23nov.pdf
You think Levi, Kullander, Essen, Leonardi, Focardi and Bianchini are
lying about the results or these people are idiots? What hidden wires?
The mains cord went to the Blue Box and then to the reactor. Everything
was visible. Look at the photos. What not checking for hidden wires? You
can see
Exactly.
AG
On 11/25/2011 7:42 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Agreed AG!
In fact, on several of the earlier tests, the reactor was lifted up off of
the table so one could see that there were no hidden wires or pipes
attached.
SO, there are only two possibilities here:
1) Mary is aware of
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
You think Levi, Kullander, Essen, Leonardi, Focardi and Bianchini are
lying about the results or these people are idiots?
They don't have to be idiots to be fooled. Scientists are more easily
fooled than most
, prime cow ribs, bourbon
sweet potatoes and fermented grapejuice!
-m
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 1:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Kullander Nov. 23 lecture slides (mostly in Swedish)
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:08
33 matches
Mail list logo
