May be an image of 5 people and text that says
more deletions to follow
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 23:52
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouT
happy | The Great Reset | Klaus Schwab
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IzwiH40JOc
-- Original Message -- From: "Lennart Thornros"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 20
Sep, 21 At 23:19 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction
to Cold Fusion
Sep, 21 At 23:19
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
Just så the Said in germany in the 1930is. Government can do as they
want. The government wants our best.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 13:09 Jed Rothwell <mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.c
Just så the Said in germany in the 1930is. Government can do as they want.
The government wants our best.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 13:09 Jed Rothwell wrote:
> ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
>
>
>> >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice
>>
>
> Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never
I disagree, it is fascism when corporations and government are in
partnership.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 18:09
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
> >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice
>
Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never allowed to interfere with
my freedom of speech, or Facebook's, or the U.S. government's freedom of
speech. The voters are not allowed to overrule the Constitution. The
I see they don't mention using deuterium, (heavy hydrogen,) and micro-cluster
palladium as a source, which is the easiest and most cost effective.
On Monday, September 20, 2021, 08:29:46 AM PDT, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
government and big tech working together is
ishers for the benefit of
the public since colonial times.<<
myth
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:29
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
R
Emails
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGvRzwdnnM0
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
government and
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
government and big tech working together is fascism -> the electorate
> didn't vote for that
>
No vote is needed. The government and big tech both have the right of free
speech, and the right to do whatever they like as long as it is legal. The
electorate cannot take away
is that free?
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> >
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
they hooked me
>
Poor you! Maybe there is some kind YouTube addiction withdrawal support
network.
ate until kill it
https://awareity.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/temp_frogs.png
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:51
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion"
they hooked me
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:56
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com>
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
more things have to pay for all adds up
>
Okay, so if the ads annoy you and you don't want to pay $12 a month, don't
watch YouTube. No one is forcing you to watch it. I do not understand what
you are complaining about.
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with
> big tech to censor -->
>
The government and big tech have every right to work together.
> The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech “…to
> flag ‘problematic’ posts
more things have to pay for all adds up
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:40
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to get
> people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them.
>
$12 a month does not seem like fleecing to me. It is more than I would be
willing to pay, but a lot less than cable TV, or YouTube
g/wiki/YouTube
so is a platform, NOT publisher
trouble is -> it got criticized for what it shows -> so now starts
censoring
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:21
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief I
H LV wrote:
Platform, or Publisher?
> If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then
> they need to get out of the censorship business.
>
If they are trying to shield themselves claiming "platform" rights under
Code 230, that's unfair. I don't know what the story is. In
:46
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:
It is not their constitutional right to censor.
It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post cannot
be
Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to
get people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 14:50
Subject: Re: [
CB Sites wrote:
Yeah, the monetization of youtube sucks. They do have to find a way to pay
> for it so I just sit through a 30sec ad or two and skip the 2-15 minute
> ones. But annoying as heck, I agree with.
>
It turns out you can get YouTube Premium for $12 a month. That eliminates
the ads.
Platform, or Publisher?
If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then they
need to get out of the censorship business.
Adam CandeubMark Epstein
May 7, 2018
https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html
quote <>
Harry
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:56
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
It is not their constitutional right to censor.
>
It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post cannot be
forced to publish an editorial they disagree with. They can censor any
opinion or letter they want. If the government were to force them to
publish
OGER ANDERTON"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
> YouTube ads
>
> As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with
> big tech to cen
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 19:14
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership
with big tech to censor -->
not allowed to censor and big tech allowed
to censor is nonsense, when government and big tech are the same thing.
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 18:51
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction
It is not their constitutional right to censor.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
AM ROGER ANDERTON <m
AM ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
> shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech
>
Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post, FOX
News or the Scientific American can restrict
t;dangerous" -> as per Manhattan project -> parts of physics is
deemed "dangerous" and has to be censored.
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 02:03
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief In
te-all-proven-correct.html
etc.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 01:47
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was not
> censored, can you/we expect them not to eventually censor
>
YouTube never said it would not be censored. They said from the start they
would not allow pornography, revenge or dangerous vids.
It is
Well it has been free initially, next expectation -> initially it was
not censored, can you/we expect them not to eventually censor
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Saturday, 18 Sep, 21 At 21:29
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "
I revised the Video Introduction page to embed the video, and I told the
reader there are no subtitles in the downloadable version but the scripts
are below.
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1618
ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
Not really new, its the same old trick everytime; its like how illegal
> drugs are pushed -> the dealer gives you them free until you are hooked
> then you have to pay; Youtube were giving a free service, now they are
> looking for getting money from it.
>
Well, you can't
nch ->
there always turns out to be a catch. When it looks too good to be true
then it was too good to be true.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Sent: Saturday, 18 Sep, 21 At 19:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion&q
Oh. You learn something new every day. I see you can pay them to delete the
ads for $12 a month, with YouTube Premium. This I did not know, because I
am out of it. Far, far out of it. Light years away from it.
- Jed
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 7:12 PM ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> Youtube has started
17 Sep, 21 At 19:12
Subject: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
Around July of this year, the number of people viewing my video fell.
Recently I watched the video and discovered that YouTube is stuffing
advertisements in front of it. I guess that is
Around July of this year, the number of people viewing my video fell.
Recently I watched the video and discovered that YouTube is stuffing
advertisements in front of it. I guess that is why fewer people are
watching it. There does not seem to be a way to override this. The
"monetization" option is
This is off topic, but there is a new book introducing AI for the general
reader. It is short. Not detailed, but technically accurate. It is also
hilarious, with cute illustrations.
You Look Like a Thing and I Love You: How Artificial Intelligence Works and
Why It's Making the World a Weirder
The other day, the total number of views of the video exceeded 100,000.
The number of files downloaded from LENR-CANR.org has been decreasing. That
is discouraging. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213
Wow that's a lot of info to digest, but we like practical magic here.
Here is a quick question. Since you are interested in the spin-orbit
magic number 6 and carbon... do the magic numbers explain why carbon can
become magnetic?
Irradiated graphite is known to turn magnetic. A few
Jess
I believe that you would enjoy my book "Energy Cold Fusion and Antigravity"
its at Amazon and Barns and Noble. The book describes the atomic shell
structure as an effect of a condition where:
The velocity of the sound in the Nucleus = The velocity of sound in the atom
Frank
with the details.Anyway, the above is the introduction to my recent work. I'm very interested in table-top nuclear reactor potential, and particularly in the spin-orbit magic number 6, which would indicate carbon. Carbon is heavily utilized in stellar nucleosynthesis in stars more massive than our sun
I added subtitles in Japanese. It is a piece of cake to add subtitles to a
YouTube video. Tedious, but easy.
Press CC to see the subtitles.
Jean-Paul is supposed to send me a translation into French, which I will
add.
- Jed
I uploaded this video to YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjvL4zNLOGw
BLURB:
A six-minute introduction to cold fusion (the Fleischmann-Pons effect).
This video explains why we know that cold fusion is a real effect, why it
is not yet a practical source of energy, and why it will have
Just get MFMP to replicate Parkhomov. That'll go viral instantly. I
find it unlikely it will happen. I'm sure if it could be replicated
someone would have already done so by now.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been thinking about a YouTube
I think what people don't get is that there are probably dozens if not at
least a 100 or so labs trying to replicate lugano. It's likely some % of
those labs are going to make make measurement errors.And some % of that
are going to report without proper review.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:29
I have been thinking about a YouTube video 3 to 6 minutes long to introduce
cold fusion. The goal would be to increase interest in the field. Ideally,
it would be great to provoke a viral reaction attracting thousands of
viewers. Possibly even millions. I personally am not capable of making
Dear Friends,
This publication:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/lenr-needs-actionable-parameters.html
was written:
a) as weekend lecture for you;
b) as a request to you to tell many important things about LENR and its
parameters that I have forgotten or didn't know
Thank you,
Peter
--
*In my opinion regarding the needed actionable design parameters, the Ni/H
reactor design is built on the proper design and production of the micron
sized micro particles that are currently in use in the current designs of
the Ni/H reactors.*
*Since LENR is based on the geometry of
To make the link to the reference work in the first post above, first go to
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-15-11-6576
Then go to the PDF link in that page.
Some great experimental pictures of parabolic nano-pillars are found there.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Axil
An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UykmjObuELhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UykmjObuELg
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Your view of history is completely distorted.
The first person whose home blazed with electric light was J.P. Morgan,
the man who really ran America.
As far as I know, the first person who home blazed with electric light was
Thomas Edison, when his living
Let me add that Axil is confused about Christensen's claim. Christensen
does not say that small companies use disruptive technology to challenge
large ones. He says nothing about the size or political power of the
challenger. Sometimes small companies take business from large ones;
sometime large
Mason, check this map out.
http://www.mindmeister.com/64849892/tabletop-fusion-discovered
Ruby
On 8/30/13 2:08 PM, Mason Ainsworth wrote:
QUESTIONS
1. Which Players are impacted and How are they impacted?
2. What are the reasonable possible responses to LENR for each Player (or
category of
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*A development approach that may be more compatible with the way things are
today are to orient the reactor design to the needs of the grid and the
various utility companies.*
This strategy makes no sense to me. None at all! Plus it would not work
because
I became a LENR believer on June 6th after reading Mark Gibb's 5/20/13
article about E-Cat 3rd Party Testing.
Not a very rational way to start a discussion. Belief has its place,
but only in a limited way.
What's needed is a way to close the credibility gap between LENR and LENR+.
That
Your view of history is completely distorted.
The first person whose home blazed with electric light was J.P. Morgan, the
man who really ran America.. The financier also owned the first business
lit with incandescent bulbs. In the latter case, Thomas Edison himself was
on hand to flip the switch.
Good Day to All.
I became a LENR believer on June 6th after reading Mark Gibb's 5/20/13 article
about E-Cat 3rd Party Testing. I then googled LENR for more reading. The core
of my understanding is encompassed by LENRProof.com; I have followed 90-95% of
LENRPRoof's links. As a result, I set
sorry jed to quote you, just in case you forget old discussion.
to imagine the future Jed booklet :
Cold fusion and the future is an interesting start, not only for the
vision, but for the methods
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcoldfusiona.pdf
this discussion is also full of experience
*I first must disclaim this opinion as I having no business sense or
experience to back it up, outside of some nuclear reactor design thinking,
but here it goes anyway.*
**
*Both current successful developers of the Ni/H reactor are good people
having solid humanitarian, egalitarian, and
Recently, Steven Krivit of New Energy Times was
interviewed by a representative of IARPA, a U.S.
government agency, reported by Krivit at
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/Intel/Krivit-LENR-Interview-IARPA.shtml
In that interview, Krivit refers to his prior study of SRI experiment M4:
You have put more effort into this analysis than Krivit merits.
- Jed
Abd Lomax has rendered valuable service by clearly putting this lucid
exposition of the M4 data into the focus of debate about evidence for
CF:
Krivit: ...In 2004, McKubre, Hagelstein, David J. Nagel, Talbot
Chubb, Randy Hekman, Graham Hubler and Michael Melich proposed that
the Department of
Yes! I have personal experience as a channel, and have studied Jane
Roberts' Seth books since 1973, and Jesus' A Course In Miracles since
1977.
Your introduction is spot on, truthful, complete, and helpful.
Lively Communion -- invoking mutual meditative exploration: Rich
Murray 1993 April
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes! I have personal experience as a channel, and have studied Jane
Roberts' Seth books since 1973, and Jesus' A Course In Miracles since
1977.
attachment: palmslap.jpg
Greeting people,
let me introduce myself, I'm new on this list. My name is Haiko Lietz, I
am a science, political, media journalist from Cologne, Germany.
I'm writing a series about cold fusion for a German online magazine
(Telepolis). I've also recently written about an (antigravity) field
Welcome Haiko!
Steve
70 matches
Mail list logo
