Hi all,
I'm glad the Ready for the switch to git? email spawned a lively
discussion, and that a lot of people tried to actually use git. Below
are replies to different people, bundled together to prevent me from
repeating myself:
Zarel wrote:
2009/3/13 Stephen Swaney sswa...@centurytel.net
We had something akin to what is described to the git way of doing
version control in the Berlios days. Each developer wanting to do
something was given his own branch, and then someone would somehow
merge stuff for a release. It was a disaster. We need an official
repository that everyone work up
Hi all
My impression is that git is good, and probably the future, but still
a rather immature tool. Or maybe I and the other sceptics are the
immature ones that just need more time to wrap our brains around it.
Either way, I would like us to ask google for hosting for now.
- Per
+1
As
2009/3/14 Elio Gubser elio.o...@gmail.com:
As far as i understand the 'git-way' needs a person who merges every
developers commits togheter. Well I fear, with our current development
activity and team size, this would produce a lot of overhead and
bureaucracy for no big advantage.
This.
(By
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 13:51:33 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
We need an official
repository that everyone work up against, directly or indirectly, and
unless I am mistaken, even the linux kernel has this.
They used a shared repository? Do you have some docs on how they propose to
deal with
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 13:51:33 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
We need an official
repository that everyone work up against, directly or indirectly, and
unless I am mistaken, even the linux kernel has this.
They used a
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 16:55:03 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 13:51:33 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
We need an official
repository that everyone work up against, directly or indirectly, and
On Saturday, 14 March 2009 at 20:22, Dennis Schridde wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 16:55:03 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 13:51:33 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
We need an official
Hi all,
+1 on sticking with SVN.
Regards, Freddie.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Dear Git users!
Am Freitag, 13. März 2009 11:16:30 schrieb Gerard Krol:
Please test if cloning the repository works for you. If you like, you
can clone the mainline repository on Gitorious (one click+entering a
name)
For those who do not immediately figure it out:
hi all
what should we do with the 'originals'?
regards
elio
Am Freitag, den 13.03.2009, 11:49 +0100 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
Dear Git users!
Am Freitag, 13. März 2009 11:16:30 schrieb Gerard Krol:
Please test if cloning the repository works for you. If you like, you
can clone the
Let's all test the new git repositories a bit before moving the
official repository to it.
Personally I am scared by things like this:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Devurandom has convinced me that a shared repository (with multiple
people pushing
Freddie Witherden wrote:
+1 on sticking with SVN.
Could you tell us your reasons for wanting to stick with svn?
- Gerard
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Am Freitag, 13. März 2009 11:53:57 schrieb Elio Gubser:
what should we do with the 'originals'?
Er, yes... I told you that they will be lost in git-svn.
Use an extra repos maybe?
--DevU
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
Personally I am scared by things like this:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Devurandom has convinced me that a shared repository (with multiple
people pushing to) does not work well with git.
The wording is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Schridde wrote:
We could rotate the job. ;)
Whoever has the time is assigned to do it for a month and then it is passed
to
the next in the active-chain.
IMHO this would add lots of management overhead as you would have to find out
a) Who
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
Let's all test the new git repositories a bit before moving the
official repository to it.
Personally I am scared by things like this:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Devurandom
2009/3/13 Stephen Swaney sswa...@centurytel.net
Perhaps I'm becoming a neo-Luddite or perhaps I've been in this
business too long, but I find the lack of a single shared repository
disturbing. I do know a software development effort lives and dies on
the basis of its source code management.
On 3/13/09, Zarel zare...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/13 Stephen Swaney sswa...@centurytel.net
Perhaps I'm becoming a neo-Luddite or perhaps I've been in this
business too long, but I find the lack of a single shared repository
disturbing. I do know a software development effort lives and
Am Freitag, 13. März 2009 23:12:58 schrieb bugs buggy:
On 3/13/09, Zarel zare...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/13 Stephen Swaney sswa...@centurytel.net
Perhaps I'm becoming a neo-Luddite or perhaps I've been in this
business too long, but I find the lack of a single shared repository
2009/3/13 Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net:
1) Have a someone maintain the mainline repository on Gitorious and prepare
releases from there.
Or my favourite:
2) Assign a release maintainer (practically we already did that for 2.0 and
2.1), and he will fetch all the loose ends from the dev
Hi all
First I'm sorry that i've been absent during your discussions about git
I'd like to stick with svn. The only _really_ issue is buggy's
connection problems. We should only tackle this problem and not create
new ones with introducing a completely different vcs.
At least I am very happy with
On 3/13/09, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Freitag, 13. März 2009 23:12:58 schrieb bugs buggy:
This is a good point. If we don't have a centralized repo, then I am
not sure how we can 'control' (for the lack of a better word) what the
distros ship out.
IMO there is a
On 3/13/09, Zarel zare...@gmail.com wrote:
I again suggest Google Code (SVN). The last time I suggested it, the
only objection was that EvilGuru disliked that even though Google
would near certainly accept the request, they have the choice to
reject the request. Which is a rather silly
Hi Buggy!
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 01:30:39 schrieb bugs buggy:
Sounds ok, I am just not sure how we can shift the load around, since
we don't really have enough people to shift the load, and the same
people end up doing it all the time, and when those people are away,
then we are sorta
On 3/13/09, Dennis Schridde devuran...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Buggy!
Am Samstag, 14. März 2009 01:30:39 schrieb bugs buggy:
now, how do we work with the files, since they are still in the main
directory.
I am not exactly sure what you are explaining here...
I mean, I know how git
26 matches
Mail list logo
