Hi web2py community.
My users complained that emails (sent through mail.send)
arrive dated by Jan 1st, 1970.
Quick investigation showed that it is due to localized date:
Date: пт, 14 окт 2011 13:16:56 +
I fixed it by dropping hand-made line and using one from email.utils
instead (there
Hi.
I managed to crash SQLFORM(db.table).accepts(request.vars,session) call
by adding a 'delete_this_record=on' to the list of request variables.
Proposed fix:
--- sqlhtml.bak.py 2010-10-13 09:52:01.202884906 +0400
+++ sqlhtml.py 2010-10-13 09:52:06.662884519 +0400
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@
Hello.
Recently I had to setup web2py on a shared hosting. However that hosting has
wsgi support.
Also that was not a new site but rather an old site, ported to web2py
I didn't find any good documentation on how to setup web2py in this case so
had to google and experiment.
So,
1) The problem:
, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
I think this should be considered a bug and I agree with the change.
Anybody opposed?
Massimo
On Sep 7, 11:46 pm, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I think that I found some inconsistency in the topic.
When you do, say,
auth.add_permission
Sure
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:11 AM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
No, it does not. It must be done in two queries. Can you send me the
patch by email? thanks.
On Sep 8, 8:44 pm, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Updated version of the patch then. Includes case where
Hi. I think that I found some inconsistency in the topic.
When you do, say,
auth.add_permission(group_id) - it assumes the permission name 'any', table
name empty and record_id 0.
Which in turn feels like full admin rights - any action on any table on
any record.
In fact, that gives no permissions
These times fans don't need to be around the place where the site located.
More than this - it says that it runs on AppEngine :)
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:23 AM, hcvst hcv...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
http://www.domain-name-registration.co.za powered by w2p,
South African (co.za) domain name
I use web2py's DAL in my project (daemon).
I modified db.py so that all calls to create_table happen with migrate=False
(because I reuse the same db as in web app).
So all I need from DAL is .select, .update, .delete and .insert. Also I take
care to
call these functions only from single thread.
Yes, once I used it to print an 'enhanced stack backtrace'. Each time the
site engine was crashing (not web2py, long ago) the stack trace was emailed
to me along with all variables values that existed at all levels of the
trace.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:53 AM, GoldenTiger goldenboy...@gmail.com
The question is not THAT clear, but I guess you can use external library to
connect to barcode reader.
However there is at least one problem - using the barcode reader is not a
browser operation.
So you will need either an ajax app that will poll the server for the
presence of an active barcode
Hi.
While writting an application bumped into partial translation of russian
language.
Updated file attached. It is from welcome.py application, no my app specific
strings present.
Regards
Alexey
# coding: utf8
{
'update is an optional expression like field1=\'newvalue\'. You cannot update or
I think your version of python must at least match version on Google's
server. Did you check that?
Regards
Alexey
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:48 PM, mat -- mat...@gmail.com wrote:
After clicking the `compile` button in appadmin, my web2py app no longer
runs on GAE.
Is this expected behavior?
You are free to write it the way you want. You don't you do that?
{{=DIV(HR(),H1('README'),UL(LI(T('blah'}}
I think, though, that using wrappers gives lower perfomance so you'll be
consuming more CPU.
Otherwise - no objections to your method.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Stef Mientki
Hi.
I've come across another subtle problem with web2py's DAL running over IBM
DB2 database.
DB2 requires the left table to immidiatedly preceed the 'left outer join'
keyword.
IOW:
select * from a, b left outer join c on c.a_id=a.id
is incorrect. Correct form is:
select * from b, a left outer join
Hello. There is a bug in these lines:
if [key for key in attributes if not key
in valid_attributes]:
raise SyntaxError, 'invalid select attribute: %s' % key
At the moment of raise the 'key' variable holds last ispected value which is
not neccessarily incorrect.
of Field('somename','date')?
On Apr 20, 12:37 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, well.
May be that's an Oracle bug then. I use my custom 'console.py' script
here,
but output should be clear enough:
BTW - time_start column was created by web2py with this line:
Field
,NULL,2010-04-22
4,ddd,NULL,2010-04-23
(Pdb) print db(db.mytable.mydt2'2010-04-22').select()
mytable.id,mytable.myfield,mytable.mydt,mytable.mydt2
4,ddd,NULL,2010-04-23
(Pdb)
Regards
Alexey
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure.
In short: everything works
. Any counterindication?
On Apr 19, 12:32 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Sometimes I have to execute this line prior to making a query:
oradb.executesql(ALTER SESSION set NLS_DATE_FORMAT = '-MM-DD
HH24:MI:SS';)
That is because Oracle by default uses different
timestamp does.
On Apr 19, 11:19 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I'm all for it. Actually it sounds more like bugfix since atm web2py
can't make datetime queries on Oracle.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:16 PM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu
wrote:
There is no hook
Ah, one more little comment though. In two cases select yielded an empty
list - that is intentional.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, well.
May be that's an Oracle bug then. I use my custom 'console.py' script here,
but output should be clear
Hi.
Sometimes I have to execute this line prior to making a query:
oradb.executesql(ALTER SESSION set NLS_DATE_FORMAT = '-MM-DD
HH24:MI:SS';)
That is because Oracle by default uses different date format that causes my
queries to fail.
The problem is that doing that in model is incorrect -
db(db.TEST.id0). select(TEST.ALL,
b.id.count(),left=b.on(b.top_id==TEST.id))
I agree this is not completely equivalent to your query.
Massimo
On Apr 15, 3:07 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I bumped into same problem again.
But this time I actually DO use same table
a bug in
there.
Can you explain the fix below? Oracle does not understand AS? Is there
documentation about this somewhere I can reference as a comment to the
fix?
Massimo
On Apr 16, 1:11 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, Massimo, actually I was wrong here again. Sorry
Ok, I bumped into same problem again.
But this time I actually DO use same table twice.
So, the task: there is a table that MAY refer to itself.
In my application monitors network tree for disconnections (is just pings
hosts). Some alerts 'come out of the blue' and some are caused by these -
i.e.
Question not clear.
What does mean 'map' here?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Leandro - ProfessionalIT
lsever...@gmail.com wrote:
Friends,
I have a situation where I can have a dog that I don't know your
father and mother. How to resolve this ? for example, a dog that I buy
in a shop.
Hmm. Model looks ok. Why?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Leandro - ProfessionalIT
lsever...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexey,
sorry, map = define table in models.py.
-- Leandro.
--
To unsubscribe, reply using remove me as the subject.
Problem:
(Pdb) print db2db.executesql(call webxdsl.abonsearch (123, 'port_id',
'41110', '1', ?, ?);)
*** Error: ('07001', '[07001] [IBM][CLI Driver] CLI0100E Wrong number of
parameters. SQLSTATE=07001 (-9) (SQLExecDirectW)')
(Pdb) print db2db._execute(call webxdsl.abonsearch (?),(1,2))
***
)
-- Regards
Alexey Nezhdanov
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Hello.
I'm trying to use 'exists' keyword from the DB2 database. I know that web2py
doesn't support that natively so I tried to pass the additional condition in
as a string.
However I struck a problem that the same table used in the same query 3
times (query greatly simplified here but it still
as floating number - days.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:14 PM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
can you provide an example of usage?
On Feb 11, 12:48 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Sorry, didn't check if that bug still exists in latest version.
Here is the problem
Hi.
Sorry, didn't check if that bug still exists in latest version.
Here is the problem: in Oracle substracting one datetime column from the
other gives the floating number (days).
However the web2py considers the result to be another datetime, so this Set
produces invalid condition string:
(Pdb)
I_can_test_with_Oracle_if_new_DAL_supports_@(connector)_and_.(schema)_in_tablenames,
I_had_to_modify_old_DAL_for_this.
Sorry_for_underscores._Space_looks_broken.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:14 PM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
I encourage eveybody running from source to try the new
a patch (just
like before).
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not know actually as I am not the Oracle expert (or even regular
user). Will find out tomorrow.
Suppose - I can't - can you give any clue how to make an alias in web2py?
The ideal would
',length=16),
migrate=False
)
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:47 PM, mdipierro mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu wrote:
No. . and @ are not allowed in table names. Can you alias in
Orcale?
On Dec 22, 12:15 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I've googled this group for my problem
/web2py/browse_thread/thread/3c27af05333b34b5/a121f8bbccfeeb7f?lnk=gstq=oracle+table+dot#a121f8bbccfeeb7f
--
Regards
Alexey Nezhdanov
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com
)
return s.getvalue()
--
Regards
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
You don't need the thread lock over the whole function:
try: return MemcacheClient.__mc_instance
else:
lock()
if not hasattr(MemcacheClient, '__mc_instance'):
MemcacheClient.__mc_instance = _MemcacheClient(*a, **b)
unlock()
return MemcacheClient.__mc_instance
On Sun, Sep
Never tried but you probably also can try %2c
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:57 AM, SergeyPo ser...@zarealye.com wrote:
Yes, in my application comma creates invalid request' error too. I
had to write a special javascript routine to ensure that there is no
commas in requests (they are produced by
Hello.
Massimo, I have a question regarding double form submission.
There is a phrase in the book (page 188):
=
Moreover, when multiple forms are present on the same page, the mechanism
for preventing double submission breaks...
=
That was a good reason for me to look into the
1. Yes, if you want to port your application to python then you definitely
have to learn the language.
2. Since this maillist is most 'web2py developer rich' place probably it is
safe to ask here if Massimo doesn't mind.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus prakash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
:
That line should have been corrected.
You cannot have two forms in the same page with the same _formname.
That is all.
On Aug 31, 2:34 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Massimo, I have a question regarding double form submission.
There is a phrase in the book (page 188
P.S. Some corrections have been proposed. I will implement those
corrections asap.
Oh, I've spotted several typos, but right now can recall just one :(
page 187, onvalidation. In model you declare field 'd' but in external
validator you set variable 'c'.
I'll make a list of any other ones
dump that is included under it.
You have to regenerate both.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
P.S. Some corrections have been proposed. I will implement those
corrections asap.
Oh, I've spotted several typos, but right now can recall just one :(
page
yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsubscr
])
This will of course break backward compatibility, but this is
a real
security vulnerability.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py-users group
distant
future, and then some perminent work if all plays out well. (The
contract work doesn't need to be in Finland. :D)
Best Regards,
Jason Brower
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
trunk
Massimo
On Jul 22, 3:09 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 17 July 2009 19:11:11 JohnMc wrote: BTW, this is perfect
example of helpless backtrace.
Consider how much better it would be if it look like this:
==
SyntaxError: invalid field name
over all 'raise'
statements and submit a patch that will add more useful info just like in
this example?
Just sayin'.
On Jul 17, 2:12 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, this is perfect example of helpless backtrace.
Consider how much better it would be if it look like
://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/8568a5ea5800908/be4e8cfefd4c5b12?lnk=gstq=alexey+nezhdanov#be4e8cfefd4c5b12
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py
,
Yannick P.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
know why though. You just need to have some content inserted into a site
template. static file will not do that.
Massimo - is it possible to have a controllerless static view which is still
have view {{insert}} capabilities ?
Thank you.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
opinions about this before changing it.
Pros? Cons?
Massimo
On Jun 14, 10:28 pm, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I didn't meant IE. I meant that since redirect page doesn't have
anybody
for a user AND it is not a 301/303 page - it actually rendered.
That is visible at least
On Jun 14, 10:28 pm, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I didn't meant IE. I meant that since redirect page doesn't have
anybody
for a user AND it is not a 301/303 page - it actually rendered.
That is visible at least in Firefox.
Also if I just add some random content
Ok, Massimo, do you still think this is a good idea?
Should I make this optional for auth module with default set to [SE-friendly]
401?
On Saturday 13 June 2009 20:08:36 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009 16:58:33 mdipierro wrote:
I will take this patch!
Here it is, attached
are being redirected' - site again). If
you think that it is a good idea - I'll do.
On Monday 15 June 2009 01:05:25 mdipierro wrote:
You can replace the page blanking by adding some content longer than
512 chars
On Jun 13, 11:08 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 13 June 2009
='auth',f='login')}
If this is a good idea - I'll write a patch.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post to this group, send email
and redrawn as opposed to 303
which just waits a bit, then instantly replaces page content.
I do not know if there is a way to suppress that page blanking.
Otherwise it seems to be working as intended.
On Jun 13, 6:19 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm writing unit tests for my app
1143, in __init__
new_fields = [ SQLField('id', 'id') ]
SyntaxError: SQLTable: table does not exist
This worked before until I updated just this evening to Version 1.64.1
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
this way. Some let me operate normally. (I
am properly logged in during these operations.)
I'll play around more tomorrow evening and see if I can see any rhyme
or reason for the rejections.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Friday 12 June 2009 20:49:28 mdipierro wrote:
I would go with bare web2py unless somebody wants to work on improving
and clening up the sysadmin appliance.
Umm... You propose to drop /admin/ from debian web2py package???
Thanks for your help
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
:( I had to read code closer. There are actually three different keys so three
different codes required. Modified patch attached.
On Thursday 11 June 2009 17:15:23 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
Hello.
It is more proper to use 401 status code than 400 for 'not authorized'
case.
http://www.w3.org
)
Massimo
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
EXTRA model to be included - I want to avoid loading
unnecessary models.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post to this group, send
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 12:40:44 AchipA wrote:
On Jun 10, 7:01 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
I get these results (best timing):
try-variant: 10.24s
regex: 9.58s
So on my laptop try:except: function loses about 5% to regex - probably
it depends on hardware/OS
interrupted somewhere (disk, app,
multitaskting, etc).
See http://docs.python.org/library/timeit.html , it's quite useful.
I was wondering during my previous testing if I should use only 'minimal'
time. Thank you for the link, will read.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
On Jun 10, 7:48 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 16:31:31 AchipA wrote:So on my laptop
try:except: function loses about 5% to regex -
probably it depends on hardware/OS.
Interesting, which python/platform are you using
at the trunk tomorrow morning.
Massimo
On Jun 10, 11:10 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok.
Basically I'd like you to:
1) apply 'inits2.diff' - it optimises SQLTable.__init__ and
SQLField.__init__ 2) remove is_integer altogether and replace it
everywhere with
str(id).isdigit
Ok. Now the confusion is resolved.
1) Speed improvements of 70% and up that I reported yesterday are
really exist. I just reproduced a 3.47 times model speedup and 2.15
overall speedup for my app (r875 vs r822+inits).
BUT this app is atypical. I have added some time measuring code there
so it
new testing:
SERVER KERNEL
--prints
r8750.04898
r822ini 0.03070 1.60x
--silent
r8750.04914
r822ini 0.03049 1.61x
So I get much more consistent results on this hardware.
While this is obviously not the best perfomance (my weaker box,
with less RAM, troubled with video output
help to have tests in a state that you can ask others to run them;
a dozen or so other random boxes will help you gain the confidence you
seek I think
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
new testing:
SERVER KERNEL
--prints
r875 0.04898
Wrote 'optimised inits v2' patch. Tested everything.
Once again I changed my testing pattern a bit.
1) I dumped my own timing tool in favor of much more standard
'ab' (apache benchmark).
2) I decidedly will publish all these results in two main.
I just finished first round of testing. Here are
Results of second set of test runs:
r87545.523ms
r88220.614ms
inits v.1 18.464ms
inits v.2 18.677ms
inits1+lazyT15.377ms
inits2+lazyT15.280ms
Observed noise was 0.502ms for slowest execution (90:1
signal-to-noise) and 0.889ms for fastest execution
Forgot about patches. Here they are.
'optimised inits v.2'
'lazy tables' (this one is modified to be applicable to trunk version of
sql.py)
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Results of second set of test runs:
r87545.523ms
r882
Wanted to attach test data as well but automatically clicked 'send' and
oops... it gone.
Here are couple of test runs:
1.63.544.572
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, I started migration (before I was just slapping sql.py, checked
out of the trunk
-to-noise).
full 'ab' output attached
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Wanted to attach test data as well but automatically clicked 'send' and
oops... it gone.
Here are couple of test runs:
1.63.544.572
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Alexey Nezhdanov
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 09:01:04 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
about 10k times faster than yours.
Ah... no. I never used timit module before. You get values of the same order.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
is_integer=re.compile('-?[\d]+).match
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com
profiling.
Please check out the latest trunk.
Massimo
P.S. Here is small fix to is_integer. We forgot about negative numbers:
Also this version is tiny bit faster
is_integer=re.compile('-?[\d]+).match
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
x_table.diff
, will finish in ~10minutes.
Preliminary results (10 sets:)
min 0.05579
avg 0.055944
max 0.05611
model time unknown
That is against revision 875.
Massimo
On Jun 8, 9:54 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2009 17:57:36 mdipierro wrote: Thanks Alexey, since
On Monday 08 June 2009 19:27:29 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
On Monday 08 June 2009 19:18:26 mdipierro wrote:
I understand what you say below but I think it is important to measure
the total speedup from the original/stable sql.py and the one in trunk
on the same machine and same complex model
on this.
A pity really that we didn't yet hit 100% barrier.
If you don't mind - I'll continue working on it.
And btw - I just realised that my 'optimised inits' patch is not optimal. I
can do it better. Stand by.
Massimo
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
plan. Probably we
won't hit 100% barrier :(
I'm sorry guys. So much excitement...
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post
On Sunday 07 June 2009 11:13:49 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
1) When initialising, SQLField uses dir() call to find any clashes
with reserved names.
I was a bit incorrect here. It checks for already defined fields too.
Anyways - I optimised it by commenting it out :-P
In practice I'd recommend
from __future__ import with_statement
and that WILL break python 2.4 compartibility once again.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group.
To post
On Sunday 07 June 2009 15:49:31 Iceberg wrote:
On Jun7, 6:35pm, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
2) is_integer is a fast call, but with 1.1k (!) calls ...
Replaced it with my own version:
integer_pat=re.compile('[0-9]+$')
is_integer=lambda x: integer_pat.match(x)
it's about
knew that I possible breaking other people's apps. But
these changes were too effective to not try.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework group
and then into sql.py.
You omitted the validators patch completely. Why?
W/o it all that testing is loss of time. :(
I need to go now. I'll provide backwards-compartible validators patch when I
return (something like 5 hours from now).
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
app (replace welcome.w2p with
any packed app). There are many bug fixes in the library and new
features that you would otherwise miss.
Massimo
On Jun 7, 7:33 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 07 June 2009 16:10:10 mdipierro wrote: BTW... why you did not
like the newer
too then. Or may be just wait a day or two until I do deeper profiling.
Please check out the latest trunk.
Massimo
P.S. Here is small fix to is_integer. We forgot about negative numbers:
Also this version is tiny bit faster
is_integer=re.compile('-?[\d]+).match
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey
takes 30% (!!!)
of time. That expense happens mostly in the kids, but the function itself
takes a good share too. Definitely worths looking closer.
5) another __init__, now the SQLTable's. Same strings attached as to (4).
Massimo
On Jun 6, 1:14 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote
June 2009 07:53:18 Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
ON Saturday 06 June 2009 00:25:47 mdipierro wrote:
One other trick you can try is replace
db.define_table('table',SQLField('field'),...)
db.table.field.requires=
with
db.define_table('table',SQLfield('field',requires=...),...)
and so
structures somewhere
around, probably pickled. May be it is still possible to use that approach to
some extent?
Or may be I am just completely missing the point. Please comment.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
has to
open the db every time.
Massimo
On Jun 5, 2:58 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again.
Recently I measured the perfomance of web2py regarding to 'milliseconds
per request'. Got some unexpected results. The most slow part of the
application is the model. It takes
for processor time anyways.
And actually the same goes about dedicated hosting too. If someone targets
only a few visitors per day - it's ok. But not if we want tens and hundreds
pageloads per second.
On Jun 5, 11:29 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 05 June 2009 17:07:55
if there is an equivalent
function somewhere in Web2py?
If not, is there a way to show a progress of an upload to the user
(without using Flash)?
Thanks!
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
.
in principle one just need to change 200 into 500 ino
check_error_route
Can you point me to any documentation that talks about the size of
text in the error page and IE, because I do not have a windows machine
handy to test it.
Massimo
On May 24, 10:41 am, Alexey Nezhdanov
machine handy to test it.
Massimo
On May 24, 10:41 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Please see the patch attached. Tested with IE6, I don't have any
others
under
the hand, but deciding on what I've found on the Net - it should
of wrapping some of web2py's internal procedures, but I'm not
sure if I can access session instance from there.
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
web2py Web Framework
and doesn't react properly to
the error. So here is the subject - since that's an internal error - shouldn't
it be HTTP(500) or at least HTTP(400) ?
--
Sincerely yours
Alexey Nezhdanov
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
on my box so I'll test it myself.
Massimo
On May 24, 2:17 am, Alexey Nezhdanov snak...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is my problem.
There is a javascript app that does asyncronous file upload.
It works nice with web2py when I test it on localhost, but when I
deliberately tried it over a slow link
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
